[HN Gopher] A new scan to detect and cure the commonest cause of... ___________________________________________________________________ A new scan to detect and cure the commonest cause of high blood pressure Author : gmays Score : 124 points Date : 2023-01-17 19:15 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.qmul.ac.uk) (TXT) w3m dump (www.qmul.ac.uk) | yjftsjthsd-h wrote: | Hilariously, I think the HN anti-clickbait filter made this title | _more_ clickbaity: The original title was "Ten-minute scan | enables detection and cure of the commonest cause of high blood | pressure", which HN _helpfully_ removed the number from... | leading to "Minute scan detects and cures of most common cause | of high blood pressure". And a _one_ minute scan would be even | more impressive, but that 's not what it is... | dang wrote: | Yes, that happens sometimes. | | I've changed it to clearer language from the first paragraph. | QuercusMax wrote: | The current title is also wrong: it's _not_ a CT scan, but | rather a PET /CT scan (with the emphasis on the PET, which | requires injection with a radiotracer). | dang wrote: | Ok, maybe it's safest to just drop the CT. Thanks! | LinuxBender wrote: | They should still have some time to edit the description. If | that time is exceeded they could email dang and ask to edit. | The filter only happens on submission but not on edit. | ipqk wrote: | I interpreted it as a minute scan (i.e. very small, of small | importance). But it's a CT-scan which very much is not a minute | scan. | hinkley wrote: | I was picturing someone with an electron microscope, scanning | the most minute of things... | | But the rest of the shortened title is straight-up hashbrowns. | You are fixing a common problem with a scan? That's not how | medicine works. | VLM wrote: | 1 in 20 is "most"? What about the other 19 in 20? | | I was under the impression that the most common cause was being | fat. | sp332 wrote: | "Most common cause", singular. | joshenders wrote: | Was looking for this comment, thank you. | [deleted] | kashunstva wrote: | The vast majority of arterial hypertension is "essential | hypertension," meaning no identifiable cause. I assume this is | (misleadingly) saying that of the secondary (non-essential) | hypertension cases, the condition that this scan detects is the | most common. | CoastalCoder wrote: | Interesting. I thought "idiopathic" was the only medical term | for "I don't know why." | r00fus wrote: | From TFA: | | " The scan found that in two thirds of patients with elevated | aldosterone secretion, this is coming from a benign nodule in | just one of the adrenal glands, which can then be safely | removed." | | So it seems that 2/3 of the cause of HBP is elevated | aldosterone, but 1/20 of cases this can be fixed with a not-so- | invasive procedure. | 1024core wrote: | Nature article: | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-02114-5 | aantix wrote: | I had my left adrenal gland taken out in September. | | TL;DR - If you know someone that takes a lot of blood pressure | medications and has for many years, have them see an | endocrinologist and get them screened for hyperaldosteronism ( | aka Conn's syndrome ). | | Kind of a crazy story. | | I've had blood pressure (BP) issues since my senior year of high | school. 1996. Started taking my first medication then. | | Since then, I've had one hospital stay, 3 ER visits, yearly | checkups, all because my blood pressure is really hard to | control. | | I've seen 3 cardiologists and two nephrologists over these past | 25 years to help me manage my BP. | | I figured the high BP was because I was fat. | | I think my highest bp reading ever was 210/130. I'd commonly see | 170/110. Not good. | | These past couple of years, my blood pressure had gotten and | stayed really, really high. To the point where I was waking up | with headaches. I even had a few headaches where I thought I was | going to have a stroke. | | Fast forward to my most recent blood pressure related ER visit ( | in March ) - the cardiologist raises the dose on yet another | medication. I'm like "WTF is going here? This is craziness. I | can't keep taking all of these medications." | | Really frustrated, I do my own research. I stumble upon a couple | of studies citing Pheochromocytomas, a tumor on the adrenal that | secretes excessive hormones which causes an elevation in blood | pressure. | | Then I read a Washington Post article talking about a guy on "a | bucketload of blood pressure medications" that actually ends up | having a tumor on his adrenal gland. | | The general condition is called Hyperaldosteronism. This is the | condition discussed in the parent article. | | It's pretty rare - like 1/1000. You basically have an adrenal | glad that secretes too much Aldosterone which drives the bodily | retention of salt and water. Which in turn, chronically elevates | blood pressure while abnormally dumping potassium. | | At my next cardiologist appt, the Dr. basically tells me "I have | nothing else for you". He wanted to increase my four blood | pressure medications, again. He thought I should go back to see | the nephrologist. | | Given my research, I asked him for a referral to the | endocrinologist. For which he annoyingly shrugs, "sure, why not. | But they're usually booked way out." I get a call from the | endocrinologist the following Monday. I get in right away. I | mention Hyperaldosteronism. Tell them my long history with | resistant hypertension. They totally agree. They setup an | appointment for a blood screening. | | Sure enough, the tests come back with really elevated levels of | aldosterone, really low levels of renin, and really low potassium | levels. All signatures of hyperaldosteronism. | | They then do an AVS, a vascular sampling of the blood coming out | of each adrenal. It showed overwhelmingly my left adrenal | produces high volumes of aldosterone with low levels of renin. | The left adrenal's Aldosterone/renin ratio demonstrated that it | was the dominant one. | | Which is actually good, because then I could have my left adrenal | taken out, and still live very normally with the right adrenal | taking over. | | So that's how my surgery came about. My overactive adrenal has | probably been a huge contributor of my elevated blood pressure, | for many, many years. | | The pathology report came back and they did find a nodule in my | left adrenal gland, that was not visible from the initial CT | scan. | | https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/04/23/high-blood-... | | P.S. The Facebook group for Conn's Syndrome is a wealth of a | knowledge and has a few really amazing members that can guide you | on how to navigate getting tested (a lot of doctor's aren't | necessarily aware of the condition). | https://www.facebook.com/groups/652067311558303 | xiande04 wrote: | Glad you got it figured out and solved! I hate it when doctors | refuse to listen to you. | aantix wrote: | It's strange how much difference a year can make. | | I went from taking four BP medications, feeling like I would | have a stroke in the next year and would probably die. | | To now - I'm on a single BP medication (lisinipril), I've | lost 40 pounds (Mounjaro), and am optimistic about my long | term health. | secondcoming wrote: | And what happened? Did your blood pressure return to normal? | Did the years of medication have any permanent side effects? | aantix wrote: | I still take one BP medication - 40mg of Lisinopril. My blood | pressure numbers are much more "normal" - usually around | 135/85. | | I seem to be caffeine sensitive in general. On days where I | drink caffeine, my BP is ~15 points higher on the systolic | side. It lasts the entire day. I may be a slow metabolizer. | | I've had a ton of anxiety over the years that seems to have | vanished with the adrenalectomy. I was always on edge - like | I could jump out of my skin. And after the operation, that | has vanished. | | When I had the hyperaldosteronism, I started to experience | these "thunderclap headaches" - where I would suddenly get a | super-intense headache on the verge of a stroke. They were | awful. | | Those have gone away as well. | another_story wrote: | With the anxiety did you also have palpitations or | arrhythmia? I'm having a similar problem. | aantix wrote: | Yes, lots of palpitations. To the point where I wore a | monitor for a few days so that my cardiologist could | evaluate. | | With hyperaldosteronism, because your body retains elevated | levels of sodium, it dumps potassium. This is probably the | main cause of the palpitations. | | Low potassium is a marker for hyperaldosteronism. | dr_dshiv wrote: | I hope they make a lot of money. That's a pretty fantastic | system. | lol768 wrote: | The work was funded by the NIHR (i.e. the UK taxpayer); the | primary purpose is patient benefit to users of the NHS, not | profit. If they're making a disproportionate "lot of money", | there should be a signed revenue-sharing agreement in place | given the benefit of the public funds provided. | harveywi wrote: | For those who may not have access to this treatment, an | alternative is to add the following to /etc/hosts: | 127.0.0.1 facebook.com 127.0.0.1 www.facebook.com | 127.0.0.1 twitter.com 127.0.0.1 www.twitter.com | zamadatix wrote: | Better to use 0.0.0.0 and have it immediately return an error | than try to connect to localhost. | tootie wrote: | Bad joke. Social media can not cause chronic hypertension. It's | physiological. | jessriedel wrote: | Tangent: "Commonest" is listed in the dictionary as an acceptable | alternative to "most common", but I can't recall ever hearing it | before. According to Ngram the latter is 20 times more common (or | commoner, heh) but I would still have expected to remembering | hearing it. Is this a UK vs. US thing? | harveywi wrote: | It seems you have identified the second commonest cause of high | blood pressure. | mouse_ wrote: | good post | jessriedel wrote: | Journal article: Wu et al., "11C-metomidate PET CT versus Adrenal | Vein Sampling for diagnosing surgically curable primary | aldosteronism: prospective test validation, and impact of somatic | genotype and ethnicity on outcomes" | | https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1179128/v1_covere... | | Metomidate is a molecule (C_13 H_14 N_2 O_2) that naturally | collects in the adrenal glands, and 11C-metomidate is a version | where some of the carbon atoms are carbon-11, a radioactive | version that will show up on PET-CT scans. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metomidate | | For reference, a PET-CT scan costs $1k-$10k in the US. Not sure | how much the radioactive tracer adds. | pfdietz wrote: | That tracer has to be made on site, since 11C has a halflife of | 20 minutes. So there has to be a particle accelerator to make | the 11C and a chemistry lab to quickly get the 11C into the | drug. | akomtu wrote: | Looks like the cure is surgery, and with the sorry state of the | US healthcare, that's hardly a solution. | Traubenfuchs wrote: | I completely agree. Running the numbers in my head that would | be up to 10 million patients this surgery would be relevant for | in the US. | vjk800 wrote: | Can someone who knows more about the field to comment on whether | this is as revolutionary as it sounds? | Traubenfuchs wrote: | - this only concerns 5 - 10% of all hypertension patients | | - ~50% of adult Americans have hypertension | | - scanning all medication-non-responders (= people suffering | from "resistant hypertension") and operating on all of them to | remove the causative nodules sounds like quite the tall order | | - doctors won't just suddenly start sending all the resistant | hypertension patients to CTs to diagnose this cause, instead | they will continue to escalate their patients anti-hypertensive | medication, i.e. adding an aldosterone antagonist to the three | other maximum dosage blood pressure lowering medications the | patient already takes. | | - this might become an option for people suffering from | resistant hypertension that are receiving expensive, excellent | state of the art treatment | ClumsyPilot wrote: | isn't a single CT scan and surgery cheaper than 40 years of | medication? | Traubenfuchs wrote: | That small question is so complex, it could probably be | elucidated in a complete high quality bachelor thesis. | | Many of those patients will continue to have high blood | pressure for other reasons (obesity, fat intake, renal | impairment, god knows what else) and will need to continue | their medication, maybe they will downgrade (upgrade? (-; ) | from treatment resistant hypertension to normal | hypertension. A significant amount of the patients | receiving surgery will suffer from mild to severe bacterial | infections that also need treatment. | | At the top of my head I would still say yes, it would be | cheaper. | | ALSO and BUT: Please do not expect a treatment that is both | cheaper and better for the quality of life of the patient | to be chosen by default. Hospitals and doctors don't work | that way. | trynewideas wrote: | The article/headline is confusing; the real comparison is | between a non-invasive PET-CT scan using metomidate as an | imaging medium, and invasive and specialized adrenal vein | sampling (AVS), both as diagnostic tools. | | AVS is correlated using a non-metomidate adrenal CT scan | anyway, so a CT-only option would be less expensive and | could be performed in more facilities, making it more | accessible: | | > Until now, 99% are never diagnosed because of the | difficulty and unavailability of tests. | | And since AVS has such a low predictive success rate (63% | per the study), the CT-scan-only alternative doesn't even | have to be _good_ , it just has to be _about as bad_ as | AVS. | | The results of either could very well be "keep taking meds | for 40 years" or "surgery helps immensely", but the real | cost savings are in avoiding AVS and also potentially | diagnosing and treating more people sooner. | | (Also mind that the study's done in the UK, where CT scans | cost patients about PS800/US$1,000 even when done | privately, and in Scotland/Wales/N. Ireland the meds are | free to the patient. In the US, a CT scan averages about | $5,000, $12,000 isn't unheard of, and the meds cost | $7,000-$20,000 for 40 years.) | Rebelgecko wrote: | Probably not. The sticker price of my blood pressure | medicine comes out to like $60/yr. The scan alone would | probably cost more than 40 years of medication (and the #s | are potentially much worse if you consider time value of | money and all that) | golem14 wrote: | Cost to you, or combined cost for you / insurer ? Honest | question. | mikeyouse wrote: | Most blood pressure medication is dirt cheap, effective | pills have been generic for decades now -- you can get a | 3-month supply of the largest dose of lisinopril for | under $10 cash (no insurance). | | https://costplusdrugs.com/medications/lisinopril-2_5mg- | table... | jabroni_salad wrote: | It really depends on the surgery. Heart surgery isn't | exactly minor and doctors do tend to prefer non-invasive | treatment. | | I like to minimize on my needed medications though. I would | probably opt for this if it were available. | golem14 wrote: | Isn't the described remedial procedure to take a | radioactive substance that will burn out the nodules ?) | That's not that expensive or invasive. | | I understand something similar is done for Morbus Basedow | / Grave's disease with the thyroid gland. | Traubenfuchs wrote: | The linked article references "surgically curable primary | aldosteronism". | | You are probably referencing "radioiodine therapy" which | is highly specific to thyroid issues. | themantalope wrote: | Radiologist. | | It's cool, it's a nice study. The article definitely over hypes | the "common cause of hypertension". These lesions are rare. | Most people with high blood pressure have it because of | metabolic disease/chronic stress/lifestyle, and it can be | managed with changes to diet exercise and meds. | | It is true that doing adrenal vein sampling is hard and not | always successful. Having a protocol that can non-invasively | detect these lesions may save some people a procedure. | fareed79 wrote: | This is not a CT but a PET scan, it records passive radiation | from a molecule injected into the body, and therefore a 10 min | long scan. Then it is based on radioactive carbon (C-11), which | is pretty uncommon and needs quick use after production, so not | every PET(CT) can do that, it needs be in the vicinity of a | production facility (i.e. close to a university/research | hospital). This is the sense of the last sentence: it needs a | replacement the carbon with another radioactive isotope (fluor | for instance) to be doable at every PET/CT place. I don't blame | the title here, because the article itself is very strangely | written, it says as well "CT scan" but this is no "CT scan", this | is a PET scan. | selimthegrim wrote: | I wonder if US healthcare with its profusion of CT scanners can | drive down long term patient treatment costs faster with their | greater installed base. | SoftTalker wrote: | I don't know about that. I currently need an MRI and the | earliest appointment I could get was 4 weeks out, and that's | not at the closest facility (they are nearly two months out). | Maybe CT scans are faster. | themantalope wrote: | Radiologist. | | Depending on the protocol, CT scans usually take anywhere | from 5 seconds to 10 minutes (in the longer scans most of | that is waiting after contrast injection). | | MRI studies take a long time to acquire data, usually at | least 20 minutes for very short/limited studies. More | involved protocols can take hours. Patient throughput is | slower. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-17 23:00 UTC)