[HN Gopher] Job Hunting in 2022 ___________________________________________________________________ Job Hunting in 2022 Author : zeroonetwothree Score : 157 points Date : 2023-01-20 17:24 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (mhlakhani.com) (TXT) w3m dump (mhlakhani.com) | fnimick wrote: | This is just depressing. | | How is the technical interview process valuable _for companies_ | at this point when it seems to be evaluating how well you can | prepare for their specific leetcode interview, and how well you | practice the incantation of the system design problem (make sure | you follow the template and the pattern!) - do they really think | they're selecting the best candidates, and not the most practiced | interviewers? | abrahms wrote: | It's a selection for socio-economic status. Hiring people who | have enough excess time to do this grinding excludes people | like parents of young toddlers. So.. you'll probably get a | bunch of young single people w/ enough income to not need to | have multiple gigs. | ergonaught wrote: | They aren't putting much real thought into it. | | Beyond the barest basics, 99% of the time the only thing that's | genuinely relevant is whether or not the team wants to work | with the candidate. Almost nothing else that is relevant is | even knowable until after they're actually working. Exceptions | only prove the rule. | | It's a sham but I guess it makes someone feel like they've | contributed value somehow. | [deleted] | Sodman wrote: | I get that it's still a candidates market (especially for strong | candidates like OP who can get 11 offers from 13 full attempts), | but the spreadsheet of questions you should be asking a company | linked in TFA has some eyebrow raising notes and unreasonable | expectations imho. | | For example - there's a big pushback that any hiring manager | worried about a candidate who don't have required skills they | could learn in 6-12 months is "quibbling". Is this a generally | held belief? In the startup space in particular, most folks I | interview frequently have consistent < 2 year stints at _most_ if | not all of their prior companies. Expecting a 12 month ramp-up | time on a particular piece of technology _needed_ to do the job | would be an immediate no-hire from me. If I personally joined a | company and couldn 't meaningfully contribute for the first year, | I would consider that a complete failure and expect to be let go. | Do other people feel differently? Perhaps this expectation is | more applicable to larger companies than startups? | sbuccini wrote: | Thanks to the author for taking the time to write this up. I | think it is a fairly realistic description of what the process is | like for an engineer who has spent several years working in | Silicon Valley at a well-known company. | | The key takeaways, coming from someone with a similar background: | | * Rely heavily on your personal network to both identify | worthwhile opportunities and for referrals which, in the Before | Times, pretty much guaranteed an interview | | * It's worth thinking through what type of job would make you | happy _before_ you get an exploding offer | | * They had a _full_ pipeline, interviewing every day for three | weeks straight. It's a grind, but you definitely get "in the | zone". Additionally, setting this goal ensures that you are being | properly proactive/aggressive in pursuing opportunities. | | * You will probably see a design interview at any FAANG or hot | startup. The classic one I've seen like 5 times is "how would you | design a social media feed?" I still do not know the "correct" | answer to this question. | | I don't have hard evidence for this but it seems that the demand | is still very strong for experienced engineering managers. I am | curious to hear if the author interviewed for SWE positions or | engineering manager positions have they have filled both roles in | the past. | nvarsj wrote: | > They had a _full_ pipeline, interviewing every day for three | weeks straight. | | I honestly think I'd be physically incapable of doing this. I'm | on the HSP side and even a single set of interviews is enough | to drive me into an insomnia/anxiety cycle for weeks. I can't | even imagine what this would be like for me. Albeit I admit | it's the best way to get the job you want. Maybe I'm in the | wrong industry... | yamtaddle wrote: | Shit I'm brain-dead by about 3 hours into an interview or set | of interviews, even if it's not the leetcode type. It's | draining in a way that no actual work, even hair-on-fire | emergency work, is (except maybe sitting in very-tense | meetings--that's got a similar effect on me). Doing that more | than once or twice in a single week might make me consider | applying to clerk at a gas station instead. | grugagag wrote: | Haha, I feel the same. Luckily it's not everywhere like | that and you could do much better than a gas station clerk, | the biggest hurdle is to find the best place where you'd be | the best fit at, the interview would likely run well and | everything fall into place after that | yamtaddle wrote: | Yeah, I've had the bad kind that's long enough in a day | to totally wreck me, like... twice. Failed one of those | two hard, too, LOL. Rest of my experiences have been way | more chill in my ~23 years in the industry. I can't | imagine targeting a segment where such processes are the | norm--which is why, even if I have the talent to work | there (and, who knows, maybe I don't) I'd never even | _try_ to apply to FAANG and friends, since there 's a 0% | chance I'd make it through one of their about-a-whole-day | processes without bombing the entire back half, no matter | how much I prepped. | ojbyrne wrote: | Maybe it's just me, but when I have done that, the first one | or two are the hardest, then you get in a groove, and become | more aware that its just a numbers game. | nvarsj wrote: | I think we're all affected to different degrees. I've done | a few interview loops in the space of a couple weeks and it | never got easier. It just got worse as my insomnia got | worse. I feel it's a miracle I can pass interviews at all | since I'm operating at like 10%. | wikibob wrote: | Look into beta blockers. Also used by stage performers for | similar reasons. | | https://www.goodrx.com/conditions/generalized-anxiety- | disord... | philjohn wrote: | I feel you - last time I decided to move jobs, back in 2019, | I had a week where I had an onsite every day, and by the end | I was just done. | ketzo wrote: | The "just done" thing can be kinda dangerous too - I did | the same thing, and at the end of my hell week, I was | getting close to accepting an offer I knew was subpar, just | to be done interviewing. | | Hard to find the right balance. | nsxwolf wrote: | This is incredibly common. I hate running interviews - we do | the leetcode whiteboard pressure cooker crap - it's a policy | I have no say in unfortunately. I've had candidates with | strong backgrounds go to pieces right in front of me - it's | awful to watch and I hate that I had anything to do with | making someone experience that. | | More people than you might imagine take Xanax to get through | interviews. | mixmastamyk wrote: | Don't do it, unless you are also under surveillance? Say | yes and then run your block more humanely. | robryan wrote: | Or if there is some freedom around questions pick | something that can be worked through. The worst are | questions where if you don't know the algorithm or data | structure there is no way to work it out from first | principles. | gymbeaux wrote: | Hmm Xanny... that's not a bad idea. | nvarsj wrote: | > More people than you might imagine take Xanax to get | through interviews. | | You know, that's actually a great idea I never thought | about. I'll see if I can get a script next time I go | through interview loops. Might make the process less | hellish for me, I hope. | mhlakhani wrote: | author here - glad to see this post on HN, and glad you liked | it! | | re: your last question - I interviewed for both SWE and EM | positions, depending on what was available at any given | company. At companies that had both roles open, I talked to | folks to understand what they expected out of EMs vs engineers, | as it varied a lot - and then I picked whatever was more | appealing to me. In aggregate I went for 70% SWE / 30% EM roles | (roughly) | veqq wrote: | > what they expected out of EMs vs engineers, as it varied a | lot | | I'm curious about the rough models which exist. | theptip wrote: | Some models I've seen (I'm sure there are some other ones): | | Pure people manager - HR admin (compensation evaluation | etc), professional development, project management, team | resourcing, etc. Tend to see this less in very small | companies. | | TLM (Tech Lead / Manager) - Does all of the above, plus | also acts as a tech lead for the project - technical | design, mentoring, and possibly some coding. Tend to see | this less in very big companies. TLM are typically first- | line managers, I've not seen a TLM that manages managers | (i.e. Director level). | | Rarely, hybrid engineer/manager - Does all the above, plus | expected to contribute significantly to coding. Honestly | it's a red flag for me to see a team hiring for this | archetype, in my opinion it's a pragmatic stopgap you might | find yourself with as a small company, until you can hire | an engineer or manager to split the role; it's not | something you should explicitly hire for. | | Sometimes, product lead as "mini-CEO" - manages the | team/org and owns product direction. Typically will have a | tech lead on the team to own that side of things. This can | grow into a Director position, managing the team managers | and still owning the product function. | | Some archetyes for dedicated Staff engineers (typically the | equivalent IC-track level to a team manager): | https://staffeng.com/guides/staff-archetypes | mhlakhani wrote: | thanks for hitting the nail on the head - this is what I | saw. I was comfortable with TLM/pure people manager, but | not the hybrid (been there, done that - it was rough). | ketzo wrote: | One of the most basic is "do your managers write code?" | | My first company out of college actually banned it as a | practice - EMs were not allowed to be active contributors. | | I know at some companies, it's actually a _requirement_ , | or at least heavily encouraged, for a manager to spend at | least 20% time writing code. | | And then some places are a mixed bag. | | I can see both arguments! Just good to know that a company | has a coherent philosophy on the issue. | shagie wrote: | > The classic one I've seen like 5 times is "how would you | design a social media feed?" I still do not know the "correct" | answer to this question. | | There is no "correct" answer to it. It is an investigation into | how you break the problem down and approach it. When presented | with a challenge to it, how do you then look at it and consider | how to solve it. | | The Codeless Code - Case 83 Consequences | http://thecodelesscode.com/case/83?topic=interviews | angarg12 wrote: | > * They had a _full_ pipeline, interviewing every day for | three weeks straight. It's a grind, but you definitely get "in | the zone". Additionally, setting this goal ensures that you are | being properly proactive/aggressive in pursuing opportunities. | | As a married man nearing his 40s I can't imagine doing this. I | need to keep my full time job to support my family, so just | quit and focus 100% on prepping is not an option. Assuming a 5 | 1-hour round interview, I would need to take PTO or somehow | juggle my calendar to take interviews. I'm horrified at the | thought of taking one week off and doing interviews for 5 days | straight. I guess I'll cross that bridge when I get there. | tinyhouse wrote: | Thanks for sharing. Congrats to the author. 11 offers is amazing | I doubt one can get so many in today's market but the good thing | is you dont really need so many, 1 good one is enough. Ideally | you have 2 so that you can nagotiate more easily. | mhlakhani wrote: | thanks! I agree that you don't need this many offers - I took | the time to interview at more places since I wanted to explore | what was out there. Wouldn't recommend interviewing this | heavily. | zeroCalories wrote: | Those are some impressive numbers. While it seems clear that you | can get interviews applying through websites and recruiters, I'm | amazed by how effective networking is. Any suggestions on how I | should manage that? I add people on LinkedIn, but that's about | it. Don't really socialize or make friends with people at work. | wikibob wrote: | The answer is to socialize and make friends at work. | | People who try to "Network" artificially won't see great | success. | | People who are genuinely take an interest in what others are | doing, and are intentional about meeting once or twice a year | for coffee to catch up, are the ones who can call in a favor in | the way described in the blog post. | ghaff wrote: | And attend events, make an effort to work with people at | partner companies/clients/customers/etc. That's how I've | always landed new positions. I've never actually applied for | a position since grad school years ago. | gherkinnn wrote: | > Don't really socialize or make friends with people at work | | Well there you have it. No need to be besties, just spend time | with people you like. Be it at work or elsewhere. The rest | follows. | [deleted] | ssundarraj wrote: | > Focus on your physical self: make sure you've gotten enough | sleep, have food ready to go for lunch, and have breaks between | the interviews if possible. If the interviewer asks if you need a | minute at the start, and you do - please take it. | | This is great advice! I interviewed in 2022 and found that I | performed significantly better when well rested. I also found | that eating healthy helped during the post-lunch interviews. | | Thanks for sharing your experience. | asadlionpk wrote: | Sounds about expected even in current conditions. | | If you are fairly skilled programmer, somewhat senior. These | layoffs don't matter. | | I assure you that you won't die of hunger if you quit/are laid | off. Plenty of demand for non-coasters. | paxys wrote: | Anecdotally, a large number of experienced engineers I know at | big tech companies have been secretly hoping to be included in | an upcoming layoff round. | | So many people have mentally checked out of their current jobs | but are too lazy to grind leetcode and go through interview | loops. Unless you are in a financial crunch or have other | issues like visa sponsorship, getting paid for 6+ months to | fully focus on the next step of your career sounds like a | dream. | | Microsoft/Google/Meta/Amazon/Salesforce and the like are | spending many billions of dollars and unknowingly setting up | the largest startup incubators in the world right now (and | getting nothing out of it in return). | symlinkk wrote: | "Lazy" is the wrong word. People work for 8 hours a day and | then are expected to cook, clean, exercise, and maintain some | sort of social life. Adding in Leetcode on top of that is | going to cause something to give. There's only so many hours | in the day. | bradlys wrote: | As evident by my current habits - I'm far more willing to | walk in the cold wind and workout at the gym for two hours | than I am willing to do even one leetcode problem. | | I've been going to the gym 4-6x/week for the last couple | months. I cannot get myself to do almost any leetcode even | though I should be doing it. I've just accepted I'll not | work for a while longer and keep going to the gym anyway. | tester756 wrote: | Sorry, but in my opinion your logic is very weird. | | It's a fucking investment dude. | | You invest those hours to have higher salary / cooler job / | be better, etc. | | You don't want to put X hours of effort into something that | may make your 8h/day work better? | | Your social life probably ain't gonna disappear if you'll | spend a few hours a week for a month or two on learning | | I've been working + getting degree on weekends for 6 years, | so I kinda know something about lack of time. | | Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying everyone should be doing | LC. Just don't act as if there was some tremendous trade | off required to learn it | mythhouse wrote: | >unknowingly setting up | | Wondering why they are giving such big serverences. Surely | its not out of goodness of their hearts. 7 month severance at | google seems a bit over the top to me. | askafriend wrote: | Yeah if you're good and have the resume/experience to back it | up, you won't have any issues getting great offers even in this | market. Great candidates are not easy to find in any market. | bradlys wrote: | You're not getting roles at FAANG or most any place in SV | without doing leetcode. | avmich wrote: | This must be extremely subjective. Many times over I see very | well qualified candidates spending months in this market | looking for a position - when it took them weeks before. | asadlionpk wrote: | Well qualified != useful for the role. | notch656c wrote: | Exactly. I was fired from a tech job a decade ago and I found | plenty of food to eat in the dumpsters and it wasn't hard to | get enough day labor cleaning up puke that I was able to buy a | tarp to sleep under. | | Joking, but this also a true story. | all2 wrote: | I now want to hear the very detailed version if this story. | angarg12 wrote: | I know it's a very touchy subject, but it would be immensely | helpful if OP posted numbers about the offers he got. | | Personally, my compensation is underwater due to the recent stock | crash, and leadership has insinuated to expect zilch for 2023. | I'm not in the job market due to visa, but I feel the insane comp | bubble has burst, and I missed the train. I'm anxious to see how | the job market evolves over the next year, but I'm afraid we | won't see compensation packages nearly close to how they were the | last couple of years. | mhlakhani wrote: | I agree it's touchy unfortunately. I'm not comfortable sharing | in public due to $REASONS, but I have been sharing with | friends/family/folks who've been looking. | | I will say I got offers comparable to my pre-stock crash comp, | but I hit a comp cliff either way in 2022 (even without the | crash). | bubba_sparks wrote: | I'd rather be tortured by al qaeda than go through all that. I | wish someone would write an article on how to hack this process. | There's always a back door. Then again if there were I wouldn't | be sharing it here. | [deleted] | vsareto wrote: | That first impression (and how you tackled it) of system design | interviews makes me question their usefulness. Like, how good of | a signal can companies really be getting if it's too different | from real world systems? | | Feels like an artificial wall too - many companies don't approach | the scale where this stuff matters, so getting that experience is | hard. | mhlakhani wrote: | To be fair, these interviews provide a lot of valuable signal | in terms of how you approach tradeoffs and explore a problem | space. In that sense they're quite similar to the work I did at | $dayjob, just in a compressed timeframe (which makes it | challenging). As you said, the questions are similar to real | world systems _at these companies_ -- it 's just that you won't | have experience with these systems unless you've worked at | these companies before. It's a catch-22. | [deleted] | Hermitian909 wrote: | > Like, how good of a signal can companies really be getting if | it's too different from real world systems? | | There are "layers" to the signal you can get from system design | interviews: | | 1. Are they aware of "big concepts", indexing, sharding, | queues, scheduling, etc. | | 2. Are they comfortable actually using and manipulating these | abstractions in an academic sense? e.g. new college grads may | have never used an index, but can walk me through how we might | use one to solve a given problem. | | 3. Do they have experience operationalizing these concepts? | e.g. in DB design questions I love it when candidates are able | to walk through a zero downtime migration plan from before and | after we add a feature. | | 4. Related to 3, How do they weight tradeoffs in the system? Do | they drill down into product requirements to help inform these | tradeoffs? | | A system design interview often lets me say: "They're not | experienced enough at our scale for me to want to hire them at | level X, but I'd hire them at level X-1" | | All this said, I do think more companies should try to draw | design interview questions directly from their own company | experience e.g. imagine we didn't have feature X, how would you | add it to the product? | [deleted] | bcrosby95 wrote: | > imagine we didn't have feature X, how would you add it to | the product? | | I think pulling specific ideas from your actual system is | full of traps. These are probably problems you've thought of | - both actively and passively - for days, months, or even | years. | | The person you're interviewing has had no such benefit, and | it might be very hard for the interviewer to be able to | separate what they think is reasonable and what is actually | reasonable. | Hermitian909 wrote: | > I think pulling specific ideas from your actual system is | full of traps. These are probably problems you've thought | of - both actively and passively - for days, months, or | even years. | | The first time you give the interview certainly, but you | have time to formalize and tune the interview. Write down | what you're going to ask, what signals you're looking for, | the quality of a solution you expect. Socialize this with | engineers who weren't directly involved in the design of | the system, ask for their feedback. | | You can usually iron out a question in 10-20 interviews and | make it really stellar within a 100. I know that's a lot of | potentially wasted hours, but the ROI in terms of candidate | quality is worth way more. | nsxwolf wrote: | On my last job search I found that overloading myself with | interviews was very stressful. It's one of the reason I will no | longer continue with any process that has take home assignments - | at one point I had 4 different assignments with overlapping due | dates. Far too much stress (and I was ghosted on all of them). | | It's also not fun to be waiting to hear from the places you're | really interested in while you've multiple exploding offers. One | of the offers exploded before the date I was told it would. On | the plus side I was able to use the offers as leverage to speed | up the process at the job I finally did take. | | If I have to do it again I will set some sensible limits on | myself. | majormajor wrote: | I always thought the idea of a take-home sounded appealing, | especially when I first heard of them ~15 years ago. | | The first time I found a bug in a company's take home project | spec rather spoiled them for me. And sadly, that's not the only | time that happened! A candidate who puts more effort into it | than the person who created it gets rewarded by feeling | confused or like they're missing something because it doesn't | add up? Nope, not great. | | And now, 15 years further along, the idea of investing 4+ hours | of my own time _without even a human to ask questions of or | discuss things with_ just has no real appeal (I 've seen some | that expect 8+, even). | remote_phone wrote: | I felt exactly the opposite. | | Having so many interviews makes you feel more relaxed for every | interview because you become numb to it. You don't care if you | flunk your FAANG interview because you already have a good | chance with a mid-sized smaller company, which makes you even | better for the FAANG interview. | | I did over a dozen interview loops when I was looking last year | and I felt great and at the top of my game. | mikedelago wrote: | I don't blame you. Take home assignments are ridiculous, | anyway. My personal time is valuable to me and it's unrealistic | to expect me to do homework just for the privilege of an | interview. | | In my last job hunt, I flat out declined further interview if I | was requested to do a take home assignment. | dirtbag__dad wrote: | Would you prefer a take home or a live coding challenge? | | I have the total opposite experience. I have rarely done well | on a live code problem, I clam up. Tbh it's humiliating, not | representative of my actual skill set, and a waste of | everyone's time. | | The amount of time I'd need to study to be good at live | coding is less than doing a couple take homes for companies | I'm actually interested in. | nsxwolf wrote: | The idea of a take home originally appealed to me, but my | actual track record with them is very poor. They are | usually too open ended - sometimes they'll say to write | some service, that it shouldn't take more than an evening, | and then you're left questioning how much they're | expecting. Do they want a quick proof of concept? Do they | want unit tests? Acceptance tests? | | Then there's the follow up - often a rejection with no | comments on the code whatsoever. Or you get completely | ghosted. Or, and this is the real kicker - they finally ask | you to come in, where they have you do leetcode on a | whiteboard anyway. | | If the process was "Here's what we're expecting, turn it in | by X date, we'll have you do a review with the team, and | assuming all goes well, we'll talk about an offer at that | point" I would be a lot more open to them. But that's never | the process. | Nextgrid wrote: | The advantage of live coding challenges is that they | require the employer to put skin in the game by allocating | 1 hour of their own engineers' time. This encourages them | to filter candidates beforehand and discarding bad-fits | early rather than wasting every applicant's time even if | they have no chance to begin with. | dgunay wrote: | I personally prefer take home problems (I also have a bad | track record on "speedrun this Leetcode problem" | interviews). However I think it'd be great if applicants | could choose one or the other, without any bias in either | direction. | bitL wrote: | It could be worse; imagine you go through multiple | algorithmic rounds and a take-home task to get into TopTal, | then when finally there you still need to bid for jobs | against 1000s other developers with a TopTal matcher picking | the cheapest ones (imagine $30/h for ML gigs), and even if | you are picked by the matcher, you still need to pass client | interviews. | Ancalagon wrote: | Granted I've only attempted the Amazon interview of the FAANGs, | but good job to the OP for cracking the FAANG interviews with | only 60ish leetcode questions. I'm at 150 and have yet to crack | any. | mhlakhani wrote: | To be clear, I explicitly chose to _not_ interview at FAANGs | since I was previously at a FAANG and wanted to try my hand at | a different type of company. I 'd probably practice a bit more | for FAANGs | mixmastamyk wrote: | Can we just call it BigTech? Silly revolving acronym is | probably closer to MAMA now... why is Netflix even a member | other than to avoid a slur? | bradlys wrote: | Is the comp comparable to FAANG or is it a big step down? (At | least in terms of liquid compensation) | | This is partially why I haven't been interviewing. All the | big p(l)ayers have slowed down their hiring so much - why | bother taking a role that pays less than half. | [deleted] | gymbeaux wrote: | Cheat where possible using OpenGPT. | | Cheat where possible using OpenGPT. | | Cheat where possible using OpenGPT. | | We must prove to companies that leetcode is not the way. | paxys wrote: | You don't need OpenGPT (or whatever else) to "cheat" at | interviews. Simply copy pasting the prompt in Google is going | to get you much better results, most often the exact leetcode | page that the question was lifted from (with very useful | discussion and solutions). | | Of course most competent companies will ask a minor follow-up | which will stump candidates who are relying on such tools. | gymbeaux wrote: | "most competent companies" wouldn't rely so heavily on | leetcode in the first place. | jrockway wrote: | I asked ChatGPT one of my company's interview questions (which | involves designing a bloom filter). It got it very subtly | wrong; when asked to fix things, it made it worse. I would | definitely not use it to interview for jobs yet, but I do think | it would be good for training interviewers to detect BS and | suggest "hints" that lead things in the right direction. | Practice interview without wasting any human's time! | | Meanwhile, humans have not really struggled with this problem. | We tell you what a bloom filter is, you just have to write the | code to spec. (This is different than some interviews where you | need to know the answer to the trivia question; know what a | bloom filter is and how to implement one, or you fail. ChatGPT | was not capable of either.) | | Overall my take on the current state of AI-produced computer | programs is that the programmer is forced to take on the role | of code reviewer and detail checker, which I think is a more | difficult problem than just typing in code in a green-field | environment. The thing that's difficult about reviewing code is | that things can diverge away from your mental model so quickly, | that you don't know which details you should be checking up on. | When you're writing it from scratch, you don't lead yourself | astray in the same way. | | In a few years this could be completely different, of course. | gymbeaux wrote: | It's been working well for me all things considered. The | harder the leetcode problem, the more I have to ask it to fit | the answer it gives me, but I have always gotten it to arrive | at the correct (and most efficient) answer. I'm impressed. | You'll have a better time with it if you can tell it what's | wrong with the code, even if it's just "given this test case, | I expected X but this code gives me Y". | Der_Einzige wrote: | If you're good enough at prompting ChatGPT to get a working | leetcode hard solution in the time allowed, you're good enough | at writing complete and correct code for the job. | WoodenChair wrote: | I wrote a similar post but my search was in May instead of at the | end of the year: | | https://www.observationalhazard.com/2022/05/my-experience-wi... | avmich wrote: | I wonder, if somebody has not a happy story, but an ongoing | story of failures in job search - would he write such a story? | Or we hear only from those who succeeds? Or, assuming that | everybody eventually succeeds, those who take years to find a | position won't write about it, as they are too exhausted or | embarrassed? | ergonaught wrote: | 7 months deep, hundreds of applications, blah blah, so to | answer your question, for the most part people in this | particular situation don't write public stories about it. | | 1) It can feel like it will sabotage your chances even if it | raises awareness of your situation. Firstly because you | cannot help but "call out" some of the hiring | practices/people, and secondly because, well, must be | something wrong with you if no one is snapping you up, right? | Which leads into... | | 2) A lot of really obnoxious folks like to pounce on this and | "blame the victim", and then reference stuff like this post | to show how "it must be your fault", etc, and "ain't nobody | got time for that". It's hard enough to deal with impostor | syndrome kicking the brains in without inviting the mob to | kick as well. | | 3) It's depressing to think about it, much less to write all | that down where it becomes an objective thing that cannot be | ignored. Especially if you've tracked everything in detail (I | have). Much more pleasant to sell off your belongings and | pretend you're just embracing minimalism and forget about it. | | 4) Feels a lot like begging, and there are many complicated | reasons why people mostly don't like to do that. | bradlys wrote: | People write them - they just don't gain traction. You also | don't tend to write them with your name attached because that | literally throws your own name down the drain. | | People are also not interested in hearing troubling stories | because everyone has a troubling story. They want to hear how | you succeeded because they want to emulate that success. They | want to learn the "one small trick" that will lead them to | finally getting the job of their dreams. | mhlakhani wrote: | I've heard / read stories from people who tried really hard | and failed to find jobs (both within tech, but unfortunately | more common outside of tech). Unfortunately they don't get as | much traction as people prefer to hear stories with a happy | ending | blobbers wrote: | [flagged] | yamazakiwi wrote: | If you would be very successful in that role... but the company | says no... that is a poor fit and is a reflection of their | ability to hire qualified candidates to meet their real needs. | | I'm confused why this is funny ha ha to you...Care to expound? | dnissley wrote: | Sounds like sour grapes / cope, presumably. I didn't get that | vibe reading it though. | mhlakhani wrote: | I was genuinely glad I didn't get those offers as it would | be awkward turning them down. As an example, in one of the | cases they were looking for someone who could do a lot more | frontend/product work (something I don't have much | experience in) so even if I did join, I wouldn't do well. | That would suck both for me and the company. | | (yes, it is a bit of cope - but hey, it's only through | interviewing/learning more that you find bad fits) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-20 23:00 UTC)