[HN Gopher] Databricks cofounders weren't interested in starting... ___________________________________________________________________ Databricks cofounders weren't interested in starting a business Author : hbarka Score : 57 points Date : 2023-01-20 19:53 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.forbes.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.forbes.com) | pmdulaney wrote: | Go Bears! | toomanyrichies wrote: | https://archive.ph/XTV5g | chevman wrote: | Some weird stuff surrounding Databricks. | | I know multiple AE level folks who have left big cloud companies | (ie Google, Amazon, SFDC, etc) for literal 7 figure pay packages | at Databricks and then vaporized sometime there after. | | Lots of NDAs involved! | hackitup7 wrote: | The most interesting part of this article to me (from mid-2021) | is the view of the world's most valuable startups: | | - ByteDance $140b - Stripe $95b - SpaceX $74b - Didi $62b - | Instacart $39b - Klarna $31b - Epic Games $28.7b - Databricks | $28b - Rivian $27.6b - Nubank $25b | | Times change... | thundergolfer wrote: | That's missing Canva, which at the time was $40B, putting it | 5th on that list. Canva is now in the $20-24B range. | myroon5 wrote: | Is this mostly just a story about Databricks? | | PayPal mafia refers to how many other companies they founded | after PayPal, not the fact that they founded PayPal: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PayPal_Mafia | hbarka wrote: | + Spark | | + Ray | | + Anyscale | | "How Ray, a Distributed AI Framework, Helps Power ChatGPT" | https://thenewstack.io/how-ray-a-distributed-ai-framework-he... | | New frameworks to new companies. | [deleted] | dang wrote: | Submitted title from "There was PayPal mafia. Meet the Berkeley | mafia". That broke the site guidelines (" _Please use the | original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don 't | editorialize._") | | Since the article's own title is also linkbait, I've replaced | it with a representative phrase from the main text. | julianeon wrote: | True, but think of it this way: | | If 1 of these 7 Berkeley CS Ph.D.'s decides to leave to found | his own company, now that they all have exec experience - what | VC would turn them down? | | Every single one of them will have top tier startup experience, | having been part of the founding team of a huge success story, | AND the most technical of their first 10 hires at the same | time. | eddsh1994 wrote: | But will it be successful? The PayPal Mafia were _successful_ | in their other pursuits. And not just successful, but all | founded their own companies valued > than databricks (I | think, based on rough memory of their valuations). | adventured wrote: | It's a mixture, most have not been anywhere near as highly | valued as Databricks. | | Databricks $28 billion | | SpaceX & Tesla (~$120 billion & $421 billion) | | LinkedIn sold for $26.5 billion | | Yelp $2 billion | | YouTube sold for $1.65 billion | | Those are the major companies. Most of the PayPal mafia | went on to do angel investing or work for VC firms. | lazyasciiart wrote: | At least two of them _already_ had that background, though. | They weren't blank slates: "billionaire startup alumni founds | second billionaire startup with new colleagues" would be a | perfectly accurate title. | | > Stoica was an exec at $300 million video streaming startup | Conviva, while Shenker had been the first CEO at Nicira, a | networking firm sold in 2012 to VMware for about $1.3 billion | jefftk wrote: | _> billionaire startup alumni_ | | Only Stoica, Ghodsi, and Zaharia are listed on | https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires and I don't | think any of them were billionaires before Databricks? Exec | at a $300M company or CEO overseeing a $1.3B exit means | rich, yes, but not billionaire rich. | pedalpete wrote: | I was hoping the article would dive into some deeper insight as | to why they started the business if they weren't interested. | | I'm not "interested in starting a business" either. But I seem to | keep doing it. I was wondering why the other day. | | My core interest isn't business, but I did enjoy my time as a | software engineer and I like technology. I also have a background | in design, and love that part. I've worked in marketing and PR, | and enjoy that. Finance I'm a bit meh on, but I know how to put | together a forecast, worked in accounting for a bit, so I can do | the job. I've never worked in HR, but I've managed a few teams. | | Anybody else in a similar boat? What got you to start your | business? Or why do you stick with it? | geodel wrote: | So it is about single private company by founders of Apache | Spark. Not sure I'd call it mafia. Further I see that a high | performance distributed data processing system implemented in | Rust is building up around Apache Arrow. So Databricks lead and | hence valuations will be quite difficult to maintain. | itisit wrote: | This reads like a pre-IPO puff piece, nothing more. Without | getting into how obnoxious the term is, there's no "mafia" | here. And I'm not buying the altruism so vainly on display. | Goes to show how modern tech journalism is basically | commissioned. | mistrial9 wrote: | you mean this guy? | | https://www2.cs.uic.edu/~brents/cs494-cdcs/papers/pywren.pdf | toomanyrichies wrote: | > Down the line, $100 billion is not out of the question, Ghodsi | says--and even that could be a conservative figure. It's simple | math: Enterprise AI is already a trillion-dollar market, and it's | certain to grow much larger. If the category leader grabs just | 10% of the market, Ghodsi says, that's revenues of "many, many | hundred billions." | | Um... isn't that the same fallacy they trotted out before the | dot-com bubble of 2001? [1][2] | | 1. https://www.inc.com/erik-sherman/the-1-percent-fallacy- | that-... | | 2. | https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-1-10-billion-100-million-... | AnimalMuppet wrote: | > Enterprise AI is already a trillion-dollar market... | | It is? Source? Evidence? | | > ... and it's certain to grow much larger. | | Same questions, with at least as much skepticism. | adventured wrote: | Naturally. They're trying to keep a deflating tire inflated. | | It's one of the worst con sales pitches you can ever see as an | investor. | mikestew wrote: | Upvote for the metaphor. Because how do you keep a deflating | tire inflated? Pump, and pump, and pump some more. | | (Apologies if I'm overstating what might be obvious to | everyone else.) | lazyasciiart wrote: | > "We would tell them, 'Just take the software for free,' and | they would say 'No, we have to give you $1 million.' " | | I'd bet that they actually said "no, we will have to spend | $1million to get it ready for us to use" | prvc wrote: | >Accidental Billionaires: How Seven Academics Who Didn't Want To | Make A Cent Are Now Worth Billions | | We'll see for how long. | [deleted] | sam_lowry_ wrote: | I worked for a competitor. This business is built on ignorance | and exhuberance and is durable as egg shells. | hahaxdxd123 wrote: | Can you elaborate? I don't use Databricks, but it seems to me | a like a bread and butter SaaS infrastructure offering. | 988747 wrote: | Most use cases currently served by Apache Spark clusters | would run 10x faster on a laptop with fast SSD (Macbook | perhaps), and an ad hoc cat/grep/sed pipeline /s | dwater wrote: | As a data scientist, the greatest thing about Databricks is | their marketing and sales departments. Not that they have a | bad product, but they're not selling anything brilliantly | unique. | moneywoes wrote: | Anything they do so well? What's their moat | Kon-Peki wrote: | We use Databricks on a data processing pipeline. I don't | know of anyone in love with it. It is by far the number 1 | source of problems on that pipeline. Just in the last week: | | * It deleted hundreds of log files without warning | | * We had a failure starting a cluster; the web UI listed | the cluster, but in fact it no longer existed - we had to | recreate it. | | * Log files that it didn't delete show that it is having | problems pulling some internal metadata from an AWS IP | address (we are on Azure). | | If the directive from on high came down that we are to rip | it out and replace it with something else, nobody would be | surprised, or care. | legerdemain wrote: | > a best-of-breed piece of future predicting code called Spark | | You read it here first, folks: Apache Spark is software that | predicts the future, not just a distributed job runner for in- | memory datasets. | bsaul wrote: | Damn, thanks for that comment. I was actually wondering if they | were talking about the same "spark" i already knew. | [deleted] | geodel wrote: | Yeah, lets see if it predicts Databricks future. | mythhouse wrote: | Yes it does and its bleak. I don't understand the valuation | based on assumption that even the smallest startup will need | to write some fancy map-reduce spark jobs to do analytics and | AI. Most companies are best served by a warehouse like | snowflake and a realtime layer for analytics. I don't | understand the value add of databricks. | fdgsdfogijq wrote: | My bet is that databricks will end up like MapR. | based_karen wrote: | [flagged] | [deleted] | Avshalom wrote: | right as if _oops_ they just _accidentally /on a whim_ filed | all the paper work and hired HR and accountants... woke one day | with a billion dollar company | lazyasciiart wrote: | Boy wasn't it fortunate that some of them had done all this | paperwork and exec-ing before in successful tech startups! | They might have really struggled without a shit-ton of | business background! | Avshalom wrote: | Such a whacky coincidence! ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-20 23:00 UTC)