[HN Gopher] Has Earth's inner core stopped its strange spin? ___________________________________________________________________ Has Earth's inner core stopped its strange spin? Author : headalgorithm Score : 39 points Date : 2023-01-23 21:29 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.nature.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com) | forgotpwd16 wrote: | Topic reminds of film The Core in which the core has stopped | rotating initiating a series of apocalyptic phenomena. (And in a | Hollywoodian fashion the solution is to release a few nukes in it | to restart it.) | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote: | Naturally, the only way to get to The Core is with a vehicle | made from a metal[0] which gets sturdier (rather than... melt) | as it gets hotter. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unobtainium | amelius wrote: | That was a really bad movie. | ChuckMcM wrote: | Yes, but I know a group of geologists that made a drinking | game out of everything the movie got wrong about geology. | They are always quite drunk by the end! | pchristensen wrote: | Sounds dangerous! | wilg wrote: | It's absolutely amazing though. | dylan604 wrote: | absolutely amazingly bad though. | | i recently (within a few weeks) watched this from beginning | to end, and holy cow was i not impressed. to have so many | actors of high report to end up such a horrible movie. | amelius wrote: | They wanted to make a disaster movie, and the movie | indeed turned out to be a disaster :) | chungy wrote: | Sometimes all it takes is a film to be entertaining enough, | regardless of how dumb it may be. | bob1029 wrote: | Really bad, but I absolutely love trash like this for some | reason. I can watch movies like The Core over and over. | telman17 wrote: | Same, my wife is a geologist and one of my favorite things | is to make her watch cheesy disaster movies with me. The | commentary is hilarious. | belthesar wrote: | I wish my wife appreciated my commentary whenever there's | an obligatory hacking/software related bit on TV, haha. | greenbit wrote: | What are you talking about, that movie is a National | Treasure. | rapnie wrote: | It made a Deep Impact on me. | 867-5309 wrote: | Sandworms gotta live somewhere | tablespoon wrote: | > Topic reminds of film The Core in which the core has stopped | rotating initiating a series of apocalyptic phenomena. (And in | a Hollywoodian fashion the solution is to release a few nukes | in it to restart it.) | | They should use it in public schools to teach earth science. | sophacles wrote: | We took out all the oil, and the dynamo ground to a halt. Neat. | puffoflogic wrote: | I think something is being poorly explained, because that's a lot | - a very big lot - of angular momentum that's got to go somewhere | or come from somewhere. | mcdonje wrote: | So, I think the headline is a little misleading. The article | talks about the core spinning in relationship to the earth's | spin. So, the disputed claim is that it has been spinning | faster than the earth, and it's going to be spinning slower | than the earth. It's not stopping or reversing. | | As for what would cause it to slow down or speed up with | relationship to the speed of the planet's spin, they just say | "magnetic and gravitational forces", whatever that means. | someweirdperson wrote: | Maybe earth is a cat. They can flip themselves around while in | the air without exchanging momentum with anything. | sliken wrote: | Well keep in mind that it's not the rotation that's stopping, | or reversing. | | So far there's debate, but the data supports the core is | spinning 0.1 degrees per year faster or slower. Other | researchers think it's changes in the surface of the core (not | the rotation). What we do know is that earthquakes show waves | that travel slightly faster or slower than we'd expect if the | core's rotational speed was constant with the rest of the | planet. | | But overall it's nearly in the noise compared to the other | energies involved. The flows involved are turbulent and move | like fluids, but at the pressures and viscosties involved they | change rather slowly. Some models show it switching from | slightly faster (0.1 degrees per year) to slightly slower ever | 35 years or so. | [deleted] | [deleted] | aerophilic wrote: | Question: Is anyone familiar/aware of the possible implications | to the global magnetic field? | | I know magnetic north has been slowly shifting... but as I | understand it, this currently involves changing the values on | runways (the number on a runway is the degrees per magnetic | north)... but that is pretty much it. | | What happens if magnetic north becomes magnetic south? | | Is there anything beyond the obvious (compasses and things that | rely on compasses) that would be impacted? | david927 wrote: | Well, it had been slowly shifting around northern Canada for | the hundreds of years we have records. Lately, though, it's | been moving quite quickly towards Siberia: | | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Ma... | | I wonder if these two things are related. | greenbit wrote: | From what I've heard, the problem is that the reversal can take | a few years, during which there may be almost no field | strength. That, and there's no guarantee about exactly where | the new poles will develop, apart from them appearing at | relatively high latitudes. | xattt wrote: | * * * | someweirdperson wrote: | > The only way out of the morass is to wait for more earthquakes | to happen. | | Modern sensors might be sensitive enough that a nuke could | provide sufficient stimulation? | version_five wrote: | "I keep thinking we're on the verge of figuring this out," says | John Vidale, a seismologist at the University of Southern | California in Los Angeles. "But I'm not sure." | | I wish we saw a lot more of this and less of the "science tells | us" stuff that seems to dominate reporting now | munchler wrote: | > less of the "science tells us" stuff | | Such as? Seems to me that good science does tell us stuff, and | also admits when it doesn't know. | XorNot wrote: | The OP is complaining about mainstream science reporting, in | comments on an article being posted by _Nature_ - which is | literally the absolute top of peer-reviewed journals. | | Which is to say, it suffers from the same fallacy as when | people complain about Hacker News' collective opinion as | though a collective anything with voluntary participation is | going to be in anyway consistent. | escapecharacter wrote: | With coordination, I believe several high-level Hamon users could | undo this problem. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-23 23:00 UTC)