[HN Gopher] Amazon Is Selling Its 29-Acre Bay Area Property as R... ___________________________________________________________________ Amazon Is Selling Its 29-Acre Bay Area Property as Return to Office Stalls Author : A4ET8a8uTh0 Score : 104 points Date : 2023-01-30 21:22 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.msn.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.msn.com) | narrator wrote: | >Amazon Is Selling Its 29-Acre Bay Area Property as Return to | Office Stalls | | So you're telling me Amazon is trying to sell us on a new office | concept where we work in stalls like we're horses? | | /didn't read the article | GaryNumanVevo wrote: | I thought I was crazy when _my_ office started handing out feed | bags to go around our necks | cheriot wrote: | Sadly building offices in places that prohibit new housing will | not make sense. Your staff will have a hellish commute and/or | extremely high housing prices. The hardest possible sell to | employees accustom to WFH. | | Love the Bay Area, but we've plucked the golden goose. | muzz wrote: | The title now says "as Sales Growth Cools" instead of "as Return | to Office Stalls" | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote: | It is my bad. Please see the source below[1]: | | [1]https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/amazon-milpitas- | propert... | rootusrootus wrote: | I'm so torn on RTO. I really miss working with my team. I don't | miss commuting. I enjoy the flexibility WFH adds to my day. | space_fountain wrote: | Yeah, these people who are so all in on remote work are a bit | foreign to me. Before trying it I too thought it would be | great, but I can see what it's done to company culture and my | engagement with work. I'm sure there are people it's better | for, but there are definite downsides especially if you aren't | 40 with partner and kids | rootusrootus wrote: | As someone in my 40s with kids, I'll say for sure that the | only reason I've survived this WFH experience is because of | that. The very few times I tried remote work when I was in my | 20s, living alone, it made me stir crazy in a matter of days. | | But surviving is all I can say for it. I worked with people | that I would call friends, who I haven't seen now in a couple | years. I don't want someone to tell me they weren't really | friends, either. They were. | oldstrangers wrote: | For every company forcing a return to the office they'll always | be the smaller company that can't pay as well offering fully | remote roles. I'll gladly take a pay cut to never be confined to | an office again. | charlie0 wrote: | This. If I really care about purchasing power, I'll take the | lower salary and move to a lower cost area or country. I'm not | going back to an office unless it's my dream job. | mvc wrote: | As someone who lives in a "lower-cost area", consider that | the grass may not be greener on the other side. My sister | just bought a place in the city. Tiny compared to mine up | north. And almost as much. But if the next 10 years are like | the last 10, she could likely sell hers and buy my whole | street. | eYrKEC2 wrote: | So, live in a shoebox in the city and then what? Completely | sever all contact with your in-person social network and | start from scratch in a place where you can live like a | king? I know that's a choice some folks make, but it seems | odd to me. | btbuildem wrote: | That's a bit of reassuring news, it's nice to see a tech giant | forced by circumstances to pump the brakes / perhaps even | reconsider the whole RTO thing. | at-fates-hands wrote: | I work for a huge health care company. Throughout the early | 2000's they were busy buying up multiple large commercial | buildings to house all of their employees. | | Then Covid hit and we went through several iterations trying to | get people back into the office. | | The company spent tens of millions renovating the majority of | their buildings to open office concepts less than 18 months | before Covid hit and was still in the middle of finishing several | of the buildings when C19 hit - thus having people back in the | office was a huge risk without cubes and people using "hoteling" | and they immediately went to assigned areas and desks to try and | get people to come back in. | | First it was in two week shifts of A and B with assigned seating. | Clean, rotate, repeat. Then it was VP's who wanted everybody back | in the office and wanted badge reports so they could go after the | people not coming in. They got a metric TON of pushback from | managers who were telling their people not to come in if they | didn't feel safe. In the end, the executives relented and | approved full-time telecommuting to a majority of the employees. | | The company has already sold off four of its buildings to out- | state real estate companies and over the last year have been | consolidating everybody down to one or two of the larger | buildings. | | I've been about half and half. Its a good break to just to get | out of the house once in a while and have lunch with the other | devs who are essentially doing the same thing. | jahewson wrote: | Looks like Bloomberg has invented a new reason why Amazon is | selling this property. It's not RTO after all! who knew!? The | title is now "Amazon to Sell Bay Area Office Complex as Sales | Growth Cools". | gweinberg wrote: | Did anyone else parse "Stalls" as a plural noun rather than a | verb at first? | barbazoo wrote: | I did and just assumed that that's how they make people work | there now. I think that's what comes after open concept offices | or whatever they call it. | diggernet wrote: | Yes. Amazon is returning to office stalls. Which I interpret as | workplaces that look like this: | | https://i1.wp.com/stablestyle.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04... | | Edit: On second thought, that pic is way too nice. It'd be an | upgrade from my current cube. I was really imagining something | more like this: | | https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/24/64/1b/24641b4dbede7e32232ebdab... | dpcx wrote: | Near the beginning of the pandemic (May/June '20) I interviewed | with AWS, specifically in the Lambda space. Before even speaking | with the hiring manager, I made it clear that I wasn't interested | in relocation, but they pushed for it anyway. After I reiterated | my statement, I was told that WFH wasn't an option, and they | moved on to other candidates. | | I'm glad to hear they're coming to their senses. | paxys wrote: | > Amazon in October 2021 paid $123 million for the 29-acre | property in Milpitas, California | | Talk about buying at the exact peak of the market. | | The cat is out of the proverbial bag for all these large tech | employers. Doesn't matter if you are Amazon or Google or whoever | else. Once people got a taste of WFH life they were never going | back to the hour plus commutes, weird social structures and power | dynamics, noisy environment, lack of privacy. | ojbyrne wrote: | I think "As Return to Office Stalls" is a bit of wishful | thinking. 18000 employees gone, probably more to go, trimming | real estate is just another cost cutting measure. | chrsig wrote: | I'd been reading this as returning to Office Stalls, | comparing the open office to a barn. Or bathroom. | | Took me a moment to parse it properly that returning to the | office is stalling. | k__ wrote: | Good point on the weird social structures. | | I always found dating in the workplace kinda alarming, | especially when people would date their subordinates. | mshake2 wrote: | How about the CEO and director of HR are married, and your | department head is married to the head of a department that | your team supports, and the heads of finance are married to | each other. All in one company! Strange power dynamics | everywhere in those nepotistic little fiefdoms. | jacquesm wrote: | That's a reason to ask for immediate relocation within the | company to ensure your love interest isn't in your chain of | command/review and vv. Many companies have pretty explicit | rules around this. | | https://www.entrepreneur.com/growing-a-business/how- | google-f... | | Just a couple of things you might open the company (and | yourself) up to (from the POV of the person in the supervisor | role): | | - a sexual harassment lawsuit in case things end on a bad | note | | - colleagues complaining (possibly rightfully so) about | favoritism | | - inability to set policy because you yourself violate policy | | - a potentially very toxic situation in case the relationship | ends and you have to continue to work together | | It doesn't really matter whether the person in the supervisor | role is a male or a female, either way it looks bad and will | likely lead to trouble. | | And for an encore: between founders the risks (but also some | of the potential rewards) are even higher. I've seen a start- | up that was doing fantastically well end up in shreds because | the co-founders got romantically involved, got married, had | kids and then divorced, the divorce pretty much killed the | company. | arcticbull wrote: | About 22% of US married couples met at work, and that number | is increasing. Of course, dating subordinates is a clear no- | no. | grujicd wrote: | I get that power imbalance can be abused, and even if not - | things can get complicated. But on the other hand, love | does not know about org chart and if you meet your soulmate | that way, why should potential long-life happiness of two | people be less important than what HR says? Disclaimer: met | my wife on the job 22 years ago, although we were both | developers in same positions, not subordinate situation. | arcticbull wrote: | I completely agree, and IMO, if you find yourself in that | position and you genuinely want to pursue the romantic | relationship - it's time to end the subordinate | relationship. | itsoktocry wrote: | Sure, but is it a "good thing"? Or is it that people spend | so much time at work it's the only chance they have of | meeting anyone? | eddsh1994 wrote: | It is if the divorce rates are lower than the average, it | isn't if it's higher (indicating less-optimal marriages | due to lack of social life) | chrsig wrote: | No, it's really a terrible thing -- both for what you | noted, and the fact that if a relationship sours it could | impact coworkers. | | Any given relationship sprouting from coworking isn't | terrible, but in aggregate, I think it warrants a decent | amount of frowning. | 1123581321 wrote: | It's a good way to meet people with shared interests. | Everyone with more free time, not everyone wants to | attend meetups outside of work. Not saying meeting at | work has no downsides. | [deleted] | philwelch wrote: | It's probably better than relying on Tinder. | raz32dust wrote: | Given we spend a significant portion of lives at work, I | think it's a good thing that people find life partners at | work and a loss from remote work | MuffinFlavored wrote: | > Once people got a taste of WFH life they were never going | back to the hour plus commutes, weird social structures and | power dynamics, noisy environment, lack of privacy. | | Unless managers/directors/VPs/SVPs/C-suite executives get even | more strict and companies around the country band together to | not offer remote work closing any/all openings, forcing people | back to work. | | 3 options: | | 1. get lucky enough to find a job that allows work from home | | 2. be unemployed | | 3. suck it up and work for a company that demands you work in | the office unless you can find an alternative (aka a remote | job) | | if you can't find a remote job, you're out of luck. | | whether this breaks down in reality (aka... what % of open jobs | right now after all of these layoffs are in person vs hybrid vs | full remote) | | is it a fairytale dream that there's a ton of remote jobs out | there? especially with microsoft + google + apple + amazon | being relatively against remote work. | scifibestfi wrote: | This also shows how the overhead of unions aren't needed in | tech. Employees already have the leverage they need. | jjtheblunt wrote: | mostly agree, but for some work at a workplace was more | coherent and peaceful than working from home | barbazoo wrote: | Just a couple of hours ago I was kicking off a build that would | take about 20 minutes. It's a slow sprint so I went and put the | laundry in the dryer and then had a quick coffee with my | partner before going back to work just in time for the build to | finish. It's heaven. This is the best work life balance I've | ever had in my career and I love it. I can't think of anything | right now that would get me back into an office in the city. | ttul wrote: | How about a $10K pay cut? | lsaferite wrote: | You could easily spend 10k on commuting. That's only about | $40/day. Between fuel, maint, tolls, and maybe food, you | can easily bust $40/day in the Bay Area. That's not even | considering the _time_ spent commuting. | barbazoo wrote: | Absolute numbers are kind of meaningless but I for sure | would take a 10% lower pay at a company that did 100% WFH. | Thow in another couple percentage points for a 4 day work | week. | | I feel for all the folks that work at a place that | implemented a hybrid model because I don't see that working | ever if some people are in the office and some are | permanently remote. I bet collaboration and feeling of | togetherness suffers. When everyone's remote, you have to | adjust your processes and ceremonies to account for that. | ok_dad wrote: | I'm saving money that would normally be used for office | space; if anything I expect a pay raise. A cut would cause | me to seek other opportunities. | makeitdouble wrote: | Depends on how much 10k represents to you, many have | explicitely chosen to be paid less to get a better life | balance. | meindnoch wrote: | No thanks. How about a 10k pay _raise_ you would otherwise | spend on office space? | toomuchtodo wrote: | Sounds like providing 10% less effort and picking up more | income on the side. How much is it going to cost to replace | them when they eventually leave? Usually runs at least | $10k-$30k per req/role. | | Alas, no one else said management made good decisions. | Marissa Meyer ended remote work and then drove Yahoo into | the ground like a 737 Max. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | sounds like you need to run your build on a m2 max! | nostrademons wrote: | Edifice complex: | | http://www.ipglossary.com/glossary/edifice-complex/#.Y9hFf-w... | | As I was visiting the new space-age buildings at Meta, Google, | and Apple in 2021 (and reading about Amazon's new HQ), I was | thinking "Wow, all 4 are building new headquarters. I wonder if | this means we're at the high point of Big Tech." Seems like | that was prescient. | wildrhythms wrote: | _Unpaid_ commute... I know lots of folks in the Bay area | spending hours per day commuting (and NOVA /DC area, if you | live there you know). I'm not sure why it isn't considered | stolen wages. | chaostheory wrote: | It's probably more accurate to say wasted hours. Aren't we | all salaried and not hourly? | skyyler wrote: | I wish we were all salary. | | I drive 85 minutes one direction to work a $25/hr helpdesk | job right now. | | Barely making ends meet. Gas + car maintenance is killing | me slowly. | notyourwork wrote: | Generalizing an entire population, not everyone is salary | in the world. | webdood90 wrote: | consider the audience of HN | notyourwork wrote: | Not only are there non-salaried workers on HN, that is | also a narrow view of the world. | smeeth wrote: | Just because you can theoretically perform your job from the | location of your choice doesn't mean you have a right to | restitution for doing it somewhere else. | | Your employer has a right to set their terms of employment | and you have a right to tell them to pound sand if you don't | want to abide by them. | ok_dad wrote: | A massive power imbalance to be sure. I have a right to my | time, and an employer located in a place with zero | affordable housing closer than an hour or two away should | definitely be responsible for providing restitution for | that time. An employer doesn't have the right to my time, | but they currently have the power to force me to accept | terms via the "wouldn't it suck if you and your family | lived on the street" tactics. | raincom wrote: | Maybe, tech companies should build company towns and rent out | cheap apartments. | pixl97 wrote: | Yes, good idea, and they can pay with scrip that you use at | the company store. And then we can sell our soul to the | company store like it's 1850. | nojs wrote: | Aren't the FAANG SF - south bay shuttles paid time? | sokoloff wrote: | If your employer dictated where you worked AND where you | lived, the time traveling between the two would logically be | their responsibility. Since they've only dictated at most one | of those two things, I don't see it as reasonable for them to | pay you to move between a place they didn't pick and one they | did. | | My office used to be just outside of Boston. Could I move to | Utica, NY and claim that my 8 hour round-trip was the | entirety of my work obligation and that I was, by definition, | "meeting expectations" merely by driving back and forth every | workday? | sneak wrote: | Stealing implies unilateral and without consent. | | People opt-in to jobs and the associated commutes completely | voluntarily and consensually. | itake wrote: | Also, your commute time is your commute time. Your employer | does not control how you go to your work nor what you do | while traveling. Your employer also doesn't choose your | housing. | bcrosby95 wrote: | > Also, your commute time is your commute time. Your | employer does not control how you go to your work nor | what you do while traveling. | | Not necessarily true. Some employers offer company buses | to/from certain cities, with wifi, and they count that as | working hours. | uberduper wrote: | Hasn't the last couple years demonstrated that employers | do exactly that? - You can work remote, but you must live | within X miles of an office. - You can work remote, but | you must live in one of these states / countries. - You | can work remote N times per week. - You can work flexible | hours! Choose any 10 consecutive hours from this list of | 13 hours! - You can work from any one of our N offices. - | We're closing this office. You can continue with your | duties if you relocate to one of our other locations. - | Here's a laptop and travel bag. Give us your cell # so | you can work from anywhere at any time we need you. | | edit: I can't be bothered to fix the formatting of this | message. | Teever wrote: | I bet that if employers were legally mandated to pay | their workers for the time they commute that those | employers would suddenly appreciate the importance of | effective public transit and increased urban density. | JoshTriplett wrote: | "wage theft" in general includes things like forcing | employees to clock out before the end of their work or | clock in after the start of their work (e.g. "first clock | out, then do this long procedure, then you can leave"). | People "opt into" those jobs too, but that doesn't mean | they shouldn't get paid for all of their work. It's not | unreasonable to draw a parallel to commuting, and when the | alternative is work-from-home, expecting to get paid for | commuting seems perfectly reasonable. | bestcoder69 wrote: | Makes sense - kinda like taxes. | wing-_-nuts wrote: | Sure, just like how coal miners used to spend their | paychecks at the company store, and came home to pay rent | at the company town. | | In society, we recognize that one cannot always have a | fully 'consensual' agreement between parties of wildly | different levels of power. The only reason this hasn't been | extended to corporations is because our political system | serves _them_ , not the common man. | aetherson wrote: | Software engineers in historically well-comped roles in | the 21st Century: "My commute is _exactly like_ being a | 19th Century coal miner in a company town. " | wing-_-nuts wrote: | No of course not. I just took issue with the idea | presented that an agreement between a corporation and | worker is always 'consensual and voluntary'. | | It's not. It never has been. If I disagree with the terms | of my employment, me being unemployed is a far higher | burden than the company not having one extra worker. To | act like the employee and employer are equals in | negotiation is laughable. | wwweston wrote: | It's good to appreciate the privileges that come with | being a well-paid 21st Century knowledge worker. | | It's also good to appreciate what even a well-paid 21st C | knowledge worker has in common with other labor, | including coal miners. Solidarity helps achieve goals. | cardamomo wrote: | This doesn't really ring true in large urban areas, where | many people cannot afford to live near their workplace--the | rent is too damn high. | mvc wrote: | Companies choose to do business in a certain state and yet | I hear many "pro-business" types claim that all taxation is | theft. | hangonhn wrote: | Sure but both parties can be wrong. Saying taxation is | not theft and commute expenses for salaried workers is | not wage theft seems non-contradictory to me. | notyourwork wrote: | > hour plus commutes | | Commuting is my biggest complaint with forcefully going back to | office. If I have a bus or train that requires no brain power | for me to get to office, I am more tolerable to it. | | Perhaps this will be a kick in the improve US public | transportation for the masses? It is the only silver lining I | can think of here. | monksy wrote: | Just wait till you get a mayor who has decided to kill public | transit. Trains/buses don't show up, they're packed with | homeless using it as a bed and a toliet, and gangsters who | smoke it up. On top of that they're not running the schedule, | but "keeping the schedule intact". That's what's been | happening in Chicago. (Thanks Lori "we're a car city" | Lightfoot) | jacoblambda wrote: | This is really the kicker. I would have no problem commuting | 1+ hours into the city for work if I could actually make use | of my time. | | I can't do anything while driving beyond listen to music. An | audiobook is either going to get my full attention and I'll | be distracted while driving or I'm going to miss 30-40% of | the book trying to stay alert on the road. At that point I | might as well just not listen to the audio book at all if I | care about the contents. | | However if I could just take trains/buses into the city, | provided they actually run regularly (i.e. they don't turn a | 40 minute drive into 6 hours), I'd have 1-4 hours a day I | could allocate to reading, listening to an audio book, | watching TV, playing a game, working on personal projects, or | continuing my education. | | Sure it might be a long commute but I could do the things | that I'd otherwise barely have time for so it's not really | lost time. Doubly so if I could actually do work on a company | device while I commute (no surprise team meetings if you | aren't actually on site yet meaning work would actually get | done). | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote: | I would like to be as optimistic as you are, but CEOs are | clearly bent on returning to the old ways[1]( the gist of the | article is:"it is not your decision to make"). | | [1]https://fortune.com/2023/01/20/work-from-home-remote-work- | mo... | pklausler wrote: | "it is not your decision to make" | | I think that it is, actually. | TillE wrote: | The long-term financial benefits of remote work are likely to | outweigh the emotional / speculative resistance from certain | leaders. | jensensbutton wrote: | Agree. I worry that many companies will maintain notional | "support" for remote roles, but it will revert to a two | tiered system where in-office workers have better career | growth. | Swizec wrote: | > "it is not your decision to make" | | Sure it is! Free market competition was made for exactly this | sort of scenario. As long as _some_ employers offer WFH, | workers can make the choice. If we put a $$ figure on WFH and | this makes salaries cheaper for employers that offer WFH, | they may eventually win out the market. | | Saying "employees can't choose to WFH" may eventually be seen | as silly of a decision as saying "we only buy inputs from | countries with the highest import tariffs". | | Let the market decide. It's going to either way. | | Say I'm a company saving $50,000,000/year on office leases. | That's a lot of room for higher salaries and nicer bonuses | for my employees (including execs). And I still get to keep a | huge chunk as extra profit. | | Long-term what sounds better to the board: A CEO who says "I | saved us 50mil" or a CEO that says "I lost 30% of our | workforce but we got them all back to the office! Btw I need | another 50mil for the office" | grapescheesee wrote: | More so, I cut and saved 50,000,000. What salary increase | allotments should go to increase in pay? I'll just say we | saved n roles with the move. | perfecthjrjth wrote: | Property Address: 1001 S Milpitas Blvd, Milpitas, California | https://www.google.com/maps/place/1001+S+Milpitas+Blvd,+Milp... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-30 23:00 UTC)