[HN Gopher] Discovery could extend battery life by replacing tap... ___________________________________________________________________ Discovery could extend battery life by replacing tape that causes self-discharge Author : giuliomagnifico Score : 74 points Date : 2023-01-31 17:47 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.dal.ca) (TXT) w3m dump (www.dal.ca) | joecool1029 wrote: | I wonder if they'll switch to polyacrylamide (kapton) tape. It's | already used on packs pretty frequently just not on the tabs. | Heat shouldn't damage this material. | andrewxdiamond wrote: | Kapton tape is also quite expensive and overqualified for this | task. I think the engineers will be able to squeeze out a lot | cost by using something more "barely-capable" | tuatoru wrote: | Cellulose tape? | astangl wrote: | I was actually just reading about Kapton yesterday, and | stumbled upon some info about its deterioration being hastened | by heat. See | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapton#Characteristics | lockhouse wrote: | Honest and tangentially related question...has anyone else | noticed that Apple devices hold their battery life in suspend | mode way better than Windows, Android, or Linux ones do? | | My kids mostly only use their Kindle Fire tablets on the weekends | and even if they get fully charged Sunday night, they're running | on fumes by Friday, even if they've been completely unused in the | interim. | | Meanwhile, I have an iPhone from my employer that I usually top | off once a week, but it's still well over 80% most of the time | during the same period. | | What magic is Apple using here? | dahfizz wrote: | My experience is the opposite. My company gave me an M1 mac | that I leave plugged while I work. It is at 100% when I shut it | down Friday afternoon, and its at around 40% when I boot it up | on Monday morning. | | I suspect the battery is defective, but like I said I leave it | docked when I work anyway so I don't really care. | GoToRO wrote: | The "magic" is no features. For example All day events can have | a notification at 9:00AM and that's it. You can't change it. | You can't have 100 events with different notification times. | The phone only has to wake up at 9:00, check the events and | that"s it. There are many, many examples like this on the | iPhone. | bradyd wrote: | That's just a stupid limitation of the UI on the iPhone. On a | Mac you can set a custom time, which triggers just fine on an | iPhone. | tshaddox wrote: | > For example All day events can have a notification at | 9:00AM and that's it. | | That's a bizarre limitation that they should fix, but I don't | think it implies anything about how iPhones work in standby. | Alarms, timers, reminders, push notifications, etc. seem to | work fine in standby (although I'm sure standby battery life | is affected by how often those are happening). | izacus wrote: | It's the magic of "not being allowed to run anything". | | If you kill -9 all your Linux processes then you'll be great at | idle use as well. | | Now hunting down all the processes that might be turning on | your radios, CPUs and I/O devices is the hard part on OSes | where you can actually run things in the background, since you | easily get into tragedy of the commons situations. | | For comparison, consider a Kindle (linux device, battery lasts | for weeks) or a Garmin watch (battery life is about 3-10x | better than Apple watch) to see how different can outcomes be | if you control what processes run. | Saturate7246 wrote: | I have quite an old samsung tablet that, when I keep wifi and | bluetooth turned off in LineageOS, has just this week surprised | me as I had fully charged it and hadn't used it in about a | month or so, it still had 70% battery life left. It may have | even been closer to two months, I can't be sure. | | But if I leave the wifi on, even with syncthing/etc not running | at all, it will last about as long as you'd expect an unused | android tablet to. | | I'm sure it's many tricks adding to one great feat, but I've | always guessed that many of these devices could probably be | better optimized for what is ironically their primary use case: | using low amounts of power in standby while still able to relay | important information as needed. | | But if that's any part of the apple magic, how does the trick | work, and why aren't more devices doing similar things? | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | For Android just leave battery saver permanently enabled at | 100% charge. You lose animations and haptic feedback but it | cuts down on radio usage and extends battery life. | LeifCarrotson wrote: | A couple things: | | 1. On Windows and Linux, devices have to handle a huge number | of hardware configurations. Not everything can go into the same | "deep sleep" mode with the same instructions, so developers | implement different "idle" states that may or may not discharge | the battery quickly. Too many sales efforts focus on making a | laptop 'boot' from idle in seconds, and too few focus on making | it usable after being off for days. Look up "S3 Deep Sleep", | "Modern Standby", and the bevy of options described at | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/k... | to learn more. Apple only supports a small list of hardware | platforms, and can make deep sleep work and resume quickly and | reliably on just that list. Even the Kindle Fire is not totally | vertically integrated between the MediaTek processor and | Android OS and Amazon UI, there's bound to have been a lot of | finger-pointing and little leadership pushing for microamp- | level sleep capabilities. | | 2. Android/Windows/Linux allow users to install applications | that do things that consume battery in the background - for | example, my Tile bluetooth locators and Garmin smartwatch work | great with my Android phones. They wake up a sleeping phone and | force it to use a little power to grab a location data point or | send my watch an updated weather forecast. Apple doesn't let | third-party developers do the same. | | I'd bet that if you pushed and held the power button on your | Kindle tablet on Sunday night for 3 seconds and chose a full | "Shut Down", and then held the button again Friday for 2 | seconds, it would have the same battery level as it had when | you turned it off. It's just because it's been checking for | system/app updates and otherwise running code while 'sleeping' | unused that the batteries are low, in spite of the fact that no | humans were using it. | Dalewyn wrote: | I always just shut down my Windows/Linux machines, sleep in | all its forms has never worked properly. It's far better for | my sanity to just turn it off knowing I can just turn it back | on. | | Especially in this day and age of blazing fast (read: several | gigabytes per second) SSDs, cold boot speed for most people | is a non-issue. | superjan wrote: | I set my laptops to hibernate when the lid closes. Entire | RAM written to disk, then a full powerdown. Do turn off | wake timers and wake on USB (sometimes disabled in true | hibernation but not always). | franl wrote: | Is it even possible to fully turn off a Kindle anymore? I | want to do exactly what you're saying to prevent the draining | of the battery, but the only options that appear after | holding the power button are "Cancel" "Restart" and "Screen | Off". Holding the power button longer just seems to restart | the device :/ | cma wrote: | I they need them always on so that they can gather up data | from Amazon smart TVs that were never connected to the | internet (project Sidewalk). | lern_too_spel wrote: | Previously discussed: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34582931 | hedora wrote: | The problem is that PET plastic leaches chemicals at sub-boiling | temperatures. | | PET plastic bottles are frequently used to hold food and | beverages, and considered "safe" by the industry, despite | research that suggests they leach endocrine disruptors into food. | tuatoru wrote: | PET containers are _so_ widely used that if there were an | actual problem with them, people would be dying--or at least | ill--in millions. | chrismeller wrote: | I think you're over-exaggerating the impact to dismiss the | premise. Endocrine disrupters don't generally lead to death, | they lead to developmental and hormone disorders, ADHD, etc. | All of these things are on the uptick. | TheSpiceIsLife wrote: | * * * | NickBusey wrote: | This sounds like a small tweak in the manufacturing process that | could lead to potentially very large gains down the road. | Fantastic work! | giuliomagnifico wrote: | Yes exactly why I posted it. A little improvement that can be | real in few time, instead of some groundbreaking researches | that will never be used in daily life (in the next few years). | kazinator wrote: | We shouldn't rush to the conclusion of large gains; this plugs | a tiny leak which affects equipment that is used sporadically | between long idle times, which is a specific use case. | | This could reduce the number of service visits to battery- | powered, low-current-draw remote sensing equipment and such. In | that sort of use case, it could be a big deal. | hex4def6 wrote: | Exactly. | | This is not going to make a meaningful difference in devices | that you charge on a daily / weekly basis (cell phones, | laptops, smart watches). | | Additionally, there's a significant portion of "self | discharge" of lithium packs that is actually the battery | protection circuitry (BMS). | | That's not to say this isn't a good catch; like you mention, | low power devices that you want to go months between charges | may benefit significantly. | abracadaniel wrote: | You weren't kidding. Just switching out the tape material is | all it takes? I wonder how frequently PET based tapes are used. | I'd assume any of the pouch type batteries could be impacted, | so phones/laptops/etc. Fascinating that it wasn't noticed until | now. | supernova87a wrote: | I have a personal anecdote that is maybe related? | | I store some spare car/boat batteries in my garage, and you would | think that batteries, in their plastic/insulated containers, | should be fairly inert or impervious to odd discharge effects. | | However, over years, I have noticed that if batteries are left on | the bare floor of a garage, they will discharge over time. | Something to do with gradual leakage via the plastic contacting | ground (and maybe plus humidity) -- there is some conduction | going on! | | So instead, you have to store them on well-insulating platforms, | say styrofoam or acrylic, and they will hold their charge far | longer. But this is on the timescale of months -- I wonder how | that relates to the timescale these researchers are investigating | (and for often used batteries, I would imagine it matters less). | | These little parasitic losses that are rarely studied... | Maursault wrote: | Either your batteries were old[1], or you're overlooking | something else that might have caused increased self-discharge, | such as high humidity. | | [1] https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/general-science-you- | asked/... | chrismeller wrote: | In my first job we had several UPSes for racks of equipment | that had been augmented with marine batteries for longer life | and all the batteries were on slats of wood to keep them off | the floor. | | I asked and got the same answer you did - they will last longer | - but I've never understood _why_. | slug wrote: | Another hypothesis: | | I think that the batteries on the floor will be colder, so are | prone to lose charge / fail faster (internal discharge through | plates). | | Being colder (due to being on the floor) could also bring water | vapor condensation on the battery surface, so that could be a | path of external discharge (between the battery terminals). | mmmwww wrote: | That's what I would have thought as well. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-31 23:00 UTC)