[HN Gopher] Ghost boat with GPS leads father-son duo to man over... ___________________________________________________________________ Ghost boat with GPS leads father-son duo to man overboard Author : hnburnsy Score : 326 points Date : 2023-02-05 15:47 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.garmin.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.garmin.com) | djmips wrote: | Good job tricking me into reading a Readers Digest -Drama in real | life / Garmin advertisement... | gscott wrote: | The moral of the story is to pee in a cup | johtso wrote: | getting used to peeing in bottles might just save your life | one day | cm2187 wrote: | Or at least to stop the engine while you pee | benatkin wrote: | Or at least put your life jacket and lanyard back on. | killjoywashere wrote: | The young rescuer, Jack, is a Math major at the Naval Academy! | ruph123 wrote: | I am no boat person at all but would it not make sense to have | keys that only allow you to drive the boat if you are close by | like in modern cars? And when you fall off, it just stops a few | meters away from you. I know these small boats are probably more | simple and the transponders would need to be water proof, etc. | but the benefit could be huge. | googlryas wrote: | They have wireless lanyards to do just that. But, currents and | wind pressure are just as likely to push the boat away from you | faster than you can swim if you're overboard. | Gracana wrote: | Could be a good idea for small boats in some cases. Jet skis do | tend to have kill switch tethers. | bjyule wrote: | Boats small enough to be operated by a single person are | required by law (I believe) to be fitted with a kill switch | that is supposed to be clipped onto the operator. In the event | they go overboard, the engine shuts off. | | Of course in practice almost nobody actually uses these. | pancrufty wrote: | > Of course in practice almost nobody actually uses these. | | The damn government can't tell me what to do. | | Sigh, I see plenty of people driving with the seatbelt behind | them, which means they make the choice to ignore the advice. | Imagine _having to take action_ without being constantly told | to. | | As other comments have mentioned, we're dumb. | ryandrake wrote: | Some deliberately do it out of principle, despite knowing | it's dumb. I have a family member who refuses to wear his | seat belt simply _because the government shouldn 't tell | him what to do_. He knows it's safer, and knows that he'll | get a ticket if he's pulled over, but won't do it, purely | out of this weird, dogmatic anti-authority. | | In the field of aviation, they study aeronautical decision | making (ADM), and hazardous attitudes that prevent good | decision making. The FAA identified the so-called 5 | Hazardous Attitudes[1], and number one on the list is | "Anti-authority". I wouldn't be surprised if this attitude | is causal of accidents and negligence in other activities | like boating and driving. | | 1: https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all- | news/1999/september/... | userbinator wrote: | Given how the country was essentially founded by "anti- | authority" and still somewhat values freedom highly, it's | not so surprising. IMHO it's not a bad thing as long as | it's done in moderation. | [deleted] | lstodd wrote: | That's basically useless if there's any significant wind. | | You won't be able to catch up to a drifting boat and board it | (the latter is quite a challenge in itself). | | edit: just not go alone. | aerodog wrote: | "To me, that's divine intervention," Andrew said. | | https://quran.com/17/67 | | "When you are touched with hardship at sea, you [?]totally[?] | forget all [?]the gods[?] you [?]normally[?] invoke, except Him. | But when He delivers you [?]safely[?] to shore, you turn away. | Humankind is ever ungrateful." | interfixus wrote: | If [?]He[?] will consider not letting all the grim stuff happen | in the first place, I will get cracking on my gratitude | project. | jollofricepeas wrote: | This is such a great quote to describe the human condition. | | Tarantino should have used this for Pulp Fiction instead of | Ezekiel 25:17. It would have said so much more about the | character of Jules. | andylynch wrote: | This is a great story and endorsement of both Garmins's gear and | the people involved. The related article referenced at the end is | worthwhile too, not least for their theory about how the board | turned, a lot of things went right that day. | hansthehorse wrote: | I remember reading that 70% of the male bodies the coast guard | recovers have their zipper down. I frequently fish offshore alone | here in SE Florida and when I have to go I pee in an aft corner | and wash it down with the raw water hose. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | doesn't Home Depot or west marine sell a 5 gallon bucket sized | toilet? That might keep your boat cleaner especially if you get | hit by a rouge wave like right before you can rinse. | eschneider wrote: | Buckets are a thing. | glitcher wrote: | In my experience female passengers especially appreciate a | bucket with a privacy towel. | [deleted] | blamazon wrote: | If you think about it, a boat is basically a bucket. | selimthegrim wrote: | Even Noah's ark was a waterproof round wicker basket | (coracle). Although good point, I never thought about what | they did with all the animal waste. | DonHopkins wrote: | An imaginary waterproof round wicker basket, therefore | quite light and permeable. | blamazon wrote: | In modern times, livestock is regularly shipped en masse | from places with surplus arable land, like Australia, to | places with a dearth of arable land, like Saudi Arabia, | although I don't know what happens to the animal waste. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_export | | Interesting tangent from reading that page, the 'Seagoing | Cowboys': | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seagoing_cowboys | Symbiote wrote: | I think the animal waste is washed into the sea. | Presumably there are sumps on the deck and someone hoses | the deck (and animals!) with seawater. | | > Using the table below, and assuming one million head of | cattle a year, 20 kilograms (44 pounds) of excrement per | head per day, an average voyage time of 10 days and | vessel loading and unloading times of five days, | something in the order of 300,000 tons of excrement is | pumped into the sea during these voyages each year. A | similar calculation for sheep, voyaging more typically | for 20 days, would add a further 85,000 tons. | | > The excrement has a high water content and is | considered benign. It is treated like sewage under Marpol | Annex IV and doesn't need to be treated before dumping | far from shore. | | https://maritime-executive.com/features/live-export- | followin... | pancrufty wrote: | Are you saying I should pee into the boat? | Laaas wrote: | A bucket can also be a boat. | kzrdude wrote: | It sounds like an offhand factoid (i.e a myth), just such a | typical thing that happily spreads. | chad_strategic wrote: | Say what you will... | | Since I knew it was coming from garmin, I knew the mess I was | getting in. | | Regardless of the mindless hype, the story is compelling as a | short story. | | Everyone once in a while it's nice to read a mindless self | promotional piece in which humanity is on display. Sure beats a | personal insurance plan from some science denier quarterback? | netsharc wrote: | I didn't notice the domain, it only got me when I got to the | end of the sentence: | | > The boat had a Garmin GPS marine system, and while Andrew | said he hadn't been familiar with Garmin units prior to that, | it was easy to use, allowing him to figure it out quickly. | raldi wrote: | Imagine being stuck overboard like this and then, after two and a | half hours, seeing _your own boat coming back to pick you up._ | pksebben wrote: | ... or finish you off. It's become sentient! _swims away | furiously_ | qup wrote: | Since I know how it left me, this would have me feeling a bit | uneasy. | zaroth wrote: | My first thought is a great safety feature would be a remote | engine cutoff you could wear when you are single-handed. | Something like what jet skis have but maybe Bluetooth? | (downthread: wireless lanyard) | | Must have been absolutely terrifying watching the boat motor | away. | | What a way to go, taking a piss off the side. I do it all the | time, but not 40 miles off shore! | | If I'm sailing that far offshore the rule is you can't leave the | cockpit without a lifeline, if it's night and in daytime if | someone else isn't above deck watching you. | newsclues wrote: | I've been sailing on a lake in a dinghy and a wind shift caused | the boom to knock me out of the boat, it was a terrible | feeling. | | Lots of boats you have a safety line to keep you attached, but | the problem is that people tend not to use them. | SnowHill9902 wrote: | So what did you do? Evidently you didn't drown. | mynameisvlad wrote: | They were sailing so the dinghy presumably didn't promptly | drive away like in this story. | malandrew wrote: | Most sailing dinghys should have weather helm and will turn | up into the wind, causing the boat to end up in irons | (mainsail luffing and depowered) | malandrew wrote: | I know with sailing you want your boat to have weather helm so | it turns up into the wind and eventually ends up in irons, but | if you have autopilot engaged, you can't forget that. Do you | know if any of the newer autopilot systems will head up into | the wind if they lose contact with the remote that singlehanded | sailors will attach to their vest? | | I've seen lots of videos of singlehanded sailors where they | aren't wearing tethers in nicer weather. | zaroth wrote: | My ancient autopilot certainly doesn't support it. Nor the | engine panel. | | I've never worn a tether except at night in "blue water". | It's a bit of a stupid risk, but it's absolutely true the | most likely moment to go over is when standing right up on | the edge so you don't hit the boat when you relieve yourself! | | In hindsight you're definitely gonna be wishing you just got | a little piss on the hull. | jzwinck wrote: | The main reason you want your boat to have a bit of | weatherhelm is because it makes the boat go faster upwind. | And just because you have slight weatherhelm at optimal | upwind trim does not mean the boat will fall into irons if | the helmsman goes away. | | There are devices to shut off the autopilot for a MOB alarm, | but that won't stop the boat. And even if they did put the | boat head to wind or heave to, you can't swim fast enough to | catch even a drifting sailboat because it has so much more | windage than you. | StianOvrevage wrote: | I have this https://www.amazon.com/FELL-Marine-Wireless-Switch- | Basepack/... on my 23 foot day cruiser and I'm very happy with | it. | | Sometimes cuts when I'm on the dock untying etc but could | probably be improved by adjusting the antennae orientation. | zaroth wrote: | Cutting off your control authority at the worst possible time | would definitely be the risk trade-off! | StianOvrevage wrote: | I agree that in general that would be something to avoid. | But in my case the probability * consequence math for the | usual scenarios is still fairly low. | | When untying it only cuts once in a while when doing the | bow lines and I'm still attached at the stern, so no risk | there. | | When preparing to dock it's only if I need to find and | prepare extra rope from some of the most aft compartments, | which I do well ahead of when I need them and not during | "critical phases of operation". | | If I expect to be running around a lot during docking I | take the FOB off and place it on the dashboard. I don't | leave the helm unless the gear is in neutral, and if I fall | in the water I'm usually within 20 meters of land which I'm | fairly certain I'd be able to reach :) | sandworm101 wrote: | >> Sascha had gone to the side to relieve himself and simply fell | overboard. He'd reached for the railing to grab it on the way | down, but he missed. And that was it -- his boat sped away | without him, nearly 40 miles away from shore. | | There is an old story told about how most drowning victims are | found with their fly open... drunk people peeing into the water | slip and fall into that water. I don't know anything about this | particular incident, but peeing off a dock or over the edge of a | boat is always dangerous. You are doing something very routine at | the point where land meets water. Even without alcohol/drugs, | overconfidence with a routine task quickly leads to big mistakes. | (I saw similar incidents with people who decided pee over the | edge of cliffs. Don't do that.) | DonHopkins wrote: | Also true of the tourist corpses fished out of the icy canals | of Amsterdam in winter. | [deleted] | mozman wrote: | ... where should you pee? | blamazon wrote: | If you're alone and can't stop and don't have anything the | other commenters mentioned and your boat is fiberglass and in | good condition? Just pee inboard on the deck in a place with | good drainage and wash it off. Can't be much worse than the | droppings that birds provide. | | But, personally in general I like the humble pee bottle. At | Walmart in the RV section they have the blue chemicals used | in portable toilets and plane lavatories and the like. You | can get it in a little tide pod format. Cuts the smell and | keeps things sterile. Drop that into any container | (preferably non-translucent and 2+ liters) add a little water | and you've got your own miniature portable toilet. | | You can also buy a real portable toilet, they are quite nice | these days, but can be bulky. The keyword to find them is | "cartridge toilet" because typically the waste volume is a | container that is detached and carried to the dump point. I | once hiked 3 miles holding one of these portable toilets just | so I could take a dramatically scenic (and civilized) poop | and it was absolutely worth it. | jimnotgym wrote: | I think a bucket is more traditional... | sandworm101 wrote: | Or at least pee from behind a railing of some sort so that | when you slip you won't fall outside the boat. | yafbum wrote: | Bucket | | Gatorade bottle (the dude even had his own supply according | to TFA) | | Worst case, on deck near the drain holes, then wash it off | dzhiurgis wrote: | Cut a piece of plastic bottle to make a portable urinal | oh_my_goodness wrote: | Who is downvoting this? This is very literally the key life- | and-death question. | | Too bad if there's some humor in it. You have to live with | that sometimes. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _where should you pee?_ | | The head. If there isn't one, give a buddy a heads up. | jacurtis wrote: | In this case there was no buddy either. | | Really if you ever need to go the edge of the boat you | should be tied in. This is especially true with sailboats | since you often work at the edge of the boat doing things | like pulling lines or other actions where you can easily | lose balance or the boat can quickly shift. | | If you are sailing in open water like this, miles from | shore, especially solo, you should be tying yourself | whenever you go to the edge of the boat. This is standard | equipment on most boats, a full-body harness (often | intergrated with an CO2 inflated life vest and water | activated beacon). There is a big industrial caribiner | style clip you clip onto the railing or similar with so | that if you fall overboard you can pull yourself back. The | rig is similar to what you would wear while roofing a | house. | | This applies to all offshore boating, but if you are ever | boating solo, even more precaution should be taken to do | this. | wyldfire wrote: | Deactivate the propulsion before peeing. Maybe even drop | anchor? If you fall overboard you could probably get back | onboard. | sandworm101 wrote: | Anchors are only a thing very very close to land. Few boats | carry a thousand-foot anchor rope. | rationalist wrote: | Anchors do not need to touch the bottom of the ocean for | them to slow the watercraft down or reduce its drift. | Anchors are very much a thing far away from shore. | wiml wrote: | You should clip on. If you're moving around anywhere you | could possibly fall over, and you're alone or the water isn't | calm or you're far from shore or basically any other risk | factor, you clip yourself to the jacklines first. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _doing something very routine at the point where land meets | water_ | | Men are also doing something that typically requires two hands | on an unstable platform with limited visual cues for the | horizon. | hinkley wrote: | More serious answer. The drunk man's lean is a tale as old as | time. Get your zipper down, get situated, and your left arm | goes against the wall to stop the world from moving out from | under you. You should only need both hands for a moment. Less | if you've practiced. | | Don't some boats have a tether to the power key, like | treadmills? | Mixtape wrote: | If my memory serves, every boat I've ever been on has had | one. In my experience though, it rarely gets used, | especially if the individual driving is also fishing. The | article states that Scheller was trolling at the time, so | he likely wanted to be able to leave the console and grab | his rod at a moment's notice. Reckless as it may be, | driving with the power key attached to the console in some | way rather than yourself makes that process faster and much | easier. It's a trade-off between convenience and safety | that, unfortunately, leads many to favor convenience a | majority of the time. | matthewdgreen wrote: | Seems like there should be some inexpensive way to | buy/built a BTLE "kill switch" that hooks onto your belt. | (And indeed a simple search turns up such a product for | about $200.) | sandworm101 wrote: | Killing the power can help in some situations, but | nowhere near all of them. A small boat moves very | differently than a person treading water. It drifts in | the wind. A swimmer doesn't. Even with the engine off, | there is a good chance that he wouldn't get back on. And | a one-foot wave isn't so small when your eyes are only a | couple inches above the water. You need a positive | connection between you and boat. | patja wrote: | The tethered dead man's cutoff is a norm on small | outboards. I seem to recall it is even a legal requirement | to use it in some jurisdictions (including clipping it to | the skipper's body). But on anything out in the ocean like | this with a larger outboard with a separate steering | station it is not something that is normal at all. There | are products that achieve the same outcome including | wearable beacons that will shut the motor off if you get | separated, but they are not common and a little expensive. | LarryMullins wrote: | > _requires two hands_ | | That's quite a humble brag! | mhb wrote: | Two guys are relieving themselves into a river. | | First guy: Boy, that water is cold. | | Second guy: And deep, too! | mmaunder wrote: | Usually told at the the start of a trip as the "harnesses | always on when solo on deck or at night" policy is explained to | crew. | beardog wrote: | >"We got done and they were like, 'OK, roger that, Captain,' and | I was waiting for them to say to go find them, but of course they | can't tell you to do that, so we were just like, 'OK. We'll go | find him.'" | | Why can't the coast guard tell the first responder to try to find | them? As a layperson I thought civilian ships were often | coordinated with to help those in distress. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | Because if you tell some boating noob, they might not proceed | carefully enough to see a victim or they might multiply the | number of victims by making careless mistakes trying to be | heroes. | patja wrote: | It does seem a bit at odds with my experience monitoring VHF 16 | while sailing. When someone is in distress or there is a report | of an unmanned kayak (extremely common!), the Coast Guard will | almost always put out a call for any mariners in the vicinity | to check it out, report back, and provide aid. | Zircom wrote: | As most weird things along those lines in America, I can almost | guarantee it's some sort of liability policy. They don't wanna | be held responsible if a civilian gets themselves | hurt/lost/killed trying to rescue someone, or does the same to | the person they're trying to rescue, having being asked to or | "ordered" by someone in a perceived position of authority like | a coast guard officer. | beardog wrote: | I was thinking it was comparable to CPR/first aid | instructions from 911 calls however seafaring is inherently | more risky... | netsharc wrote: | Makes me wonder if, in this age of Covid, 911 operators | would ask callers to perform CPR. Even a "Do you know how | to perform CPR" might be interpreted as an instruction to | do so. | ghaff wrote: | It makes a lot of sense to me in this case. As you suggest, | even a "if you don't mind" from the Coast Guard could very | reasonably be taken as a polite order which they may not have | the authority to do in this case. | | >They don't wanna be held responsible if a civilian gets | themselves hurt/lost/killed trying to rescue someone, | | That seems like a not unreasonable concern even if there was | probably no material danger in this case. | philip1209 wrote: | This video about the "algorithm" the Coast Guard uses to search | for missing mariners in moving water is pretty fascinating: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoXJfuPaFF8 | yafbum wrote: | It's a great story but kind of gross the way Garmin slides in an | ad for its products being supposedly easy to use even for people | who haven't used them before | mvkel wrote: | It's on their own website. Can you blame them for promoting | their own product? Marketing isn't journalism. | yafbum wrote: | Here's a header that fixes it: "We at Garmin believe it's | essential for our products to be easy to use, and can be | lifesaving. Here's a story that illustrates it." Not hard to | add instead of starting it like your just going to tell a | story. | killjoywashere wrote: | What?! If you invented something that saved a life, you bet | your ass you'd be putting that on your company blog! Your post | is not in the spirit of HN. | lostlogin wrote: | Anti advertising, anti big corporate and a negative slant on | a feel good-story? It's completely HN. It just lacks a more | efficient search pattern recommendation and a blockchain | reference. Turns our the guy treading water also used a very | calorie inefficient leg stroke too. | renewiltord wrote: | Have we considered discussing what would happen on this | page if Javascript were to be disabled? | TheRealPomax wrote: | It's... on their site? Not sure I'd object to the company | publishing the story advertising for themselves. If NYT or WaPo | can go "nope, you've read enough, buy a subscription", Garmin | can unobtrusively go "hey thanks for reading, consider buying | something we make" =D | sitzkrieg wrote: | yea this was quite the heartstrings pulling ... advertisement | qup wrote: | When your easy-to-use interface saves a man's life, I think you | get a pass for one story. | mynameisvlad wrote: | Realistically, any GPS system would have done the same, | whether you have to touch a screen or push buttons. | | Wayfinding is like one of the most basic of features on these | units. | alar44 wrote: | How dare a company advertise their features with an | interesting story! Get a grip. | mynameisvlad wrote: | Making the claim that somehow the magical interface of | the Garmin saved this man is preposterous. | | It's a GPS unit. It's not some magical device that | pinpointed the person's exact position overboard and led | them right to it. They would have been able to do the | exact same thing on literally any other unit out there. | | As I said in another comment, Garmin is certainly | entitled to post it but people are equally entitled to | point out the ridiculous and hamfisted advertising. | sitkack wrote: | With one touch delete of GPS history, these two would be | heros sealed his fate while stumbling through our hierarchy | of menus. | | Upon returning to civilization and entering their story in | the corporate bug tracker, their feature request was | denied, as better history retention is in the +Pro model. | mynameisvlad wrote: | Anybody that has dealt with a marine GPS units can handle | all of them. These aren't sophisticated interfaces and | the features they offer for the most part is | standardized. It's not like it controls a spaceship or | something, it's _just_ a GPS unit. | | Would a random passerby potentially fuck things up? | Maybe, but realistically probably not. Would the guy that | just _jumped from moving boat to moving boat_? No, they | have obviously seen and used one of these before. | | > Upon returning to civilization and entering their story | in the corporate bug tracker, their feature request was | denied, as better history retention is in the +Pro model. | | Garmin, like practically every company out there, is well | known to hide features behind premium models. Not sure | exactly what point it is you're trying to make but Garmin | isn't a magical snowflake who doesn't partake in this | practice. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | Good luck trying to figure out how to do this on garmin's | handheld devices in a hurry! | gist wrote: | > but kind of gross the way Garmin slides in an ad for its | products | | Gross? So we have a company that is in business to make money | and employs people and spends money at other companies (that | employ and give people jobs). And they can't do obvious | marketing. And take advantage of a good opportunity to plug | their product? Everybody and every company just has to be for | the common good? Be humble no bragging and the world will be a | path to your door? | mynameisvlad wrote: | They certainly can. And people are certainly able to comment | on how hamfisted the marketing is. Freedom of speech and all | that. | brewdad wrote: | It's a corporate blog. What do you expect them to write? | | "The features of our GPS allowed a passerby to save an | overboard boater. Really any generic GPS unit from Walmart | would have done the same though." | mynameisvlad wrote: | As I said, they're certainly free to say whatever they | want to say. But people are free to criticize what they | chose to write. | | A less hamfisted approach would, for instance, remove the | quotes from the guy which were clearly prompted by the PR | folks at Garmin. | beefman wrote: | A little tacky, but bad UI does have consequences. Garmin UIs | have always been fantastic in my experience. | gamblor956 wrote: | But apparently it's okay when Apple convinces millions of | unprepared people that their iphone will save them if they get | lost or in trouble in the wilderness? | | The Apple "safety" features have cost more lives than they've | saved due to first responders wasting time on fake iAlerts that | keep them away from real emergencies. | asmor wrote: | The car crash detection, maybe. The fall detection seemed to | have been a success though. | mvkel wrote: | A woman used the SOS feature recently to get rescued, so .. | yes? | loloquwowndueo wrote: | Who said it's okay? All the media coverage I have seen point | to this iPhone feature being a pain in the ass for first | responders (skiers generating an inordinate amount of fake | calls). | | Also, please point to hard data and all the lives this has | actually cost. | ghaff wrote: | The ski falling story has been making the rounds. And I can | certainly see skiing as a fertile source for false fall | detection alerts. I would (try to remember to) disable it | if I were downhill skiing if I otherwise had it active-- | which I don't. (And really haven't decided if I should or | shouldn't.) But I also haven't actually seen data that this | is a genuine problem much less one that is overwhelming | emergency services and causing widespread carnage. | | As for the satellite SOS, actual search and rescue people | I've talked to have been of the opinion that they'd rather | someone who is in trouble or thinks they're in trouble | reach out for help sooner rather than later. It doesn't | mean a full-scale rescue needs to be mounted. Someone can | often be talked through what their problem is. It's also | not like people didn't already have this capability so long | as they were in cell phone coverage. | 10x_contrarian wrote: | > had the Garmin technology been less intuitive for an | unfamiliar boater in a stressful situation -- this story | could've ended so much differently | | This line made me look at the URL and realize I was reading an | advertisement. | iso1631 wrote: | > The boat had a Garmin GPS marine system, and while Andrew | said he hadn't been familiar with Garmin units prior to that, | it was easy to use, allowing him to figure it out quickly. | | Got me | jacurtis wrote: | The article ended with: | | > Andrew Sherman has since upgraded his tech on his own | boat. | | > "I bought a Garmin unit because I was so impressed with | Sascha's," he said. | | Definitely written to remind us all that Garmin GPS are | easy to use. Oh yeah, someone's life was saved, but don't | lose track on the shiny touchscreen GPS haha. | [deleted] | userbinator wrote: | I saw the URL before reading the article, and was basically | expecting the product placement as a punchline. | [deleted] | tobyjsullivan wrote: | It's not smooth but not terrible considering this is corporate | blog content, not journalism. | | At least they link to the original article which, after a quick | scan, seems much better written. | | https://www.readersdigest.co.uk/inspire/life/how-a-fisherman... | victor9000 wrote: | Much better link, thanks! | KennyBlanken wrote: | Reader's Digest is not "journalism." They take a fairly | simple and straightforward event and embellish the hell out | of it to make into some grand tale, keeping it at about a 5th | grade reading level. | | Compare and contrast the story to the local TV station | writeup: | | https://www.wistv.com/2021/07/07/father-son-rescue- | missing-b... | | Two fishermen see a boat with nobody piloting it, alert the | coast guard, follow the breadcrumb trail on the GPS unit, and | find the boat's owner. Owner is OK. | | This story is why you wear the safety disconnect cord, or | purchase a cable-less shutoff system that uses an radio- | beacon fob you wear. Or, you don't go deep-water solo... | tobyjsullivan wrote: | Perhaps journalism wasn't the word I should have used | there. What would you call writing about factual events in | a way that makes them interesting to read? | | That said, I don't think captivating writing is outside the | bounds of true journalism. Some might argue that's what | journalism is supposed to be. I.e., "here's an interesting | event and here's why it's interesting." | snemvalts wrote: | Learned from the best | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOHj5kGU4fY | kylehotchkiss wrote: | Garmin has a rep for difficult to use devices so if they worked | hard enough on this one that it could be used to save a guys | life (which it was! The track was mission critical for this | save), they get to brag a little about their role. This kind of | story might even ingrain better UI as a priority inside their | org which would be good for all their future customers | duxup wrote: | The story is on garmin.com ... call me crazy but I don't find | this the least bit "gross". | yafbum wrote: | It would be much better to own up the pitch upfront. Like, | start with a line at the top saying something like "We at | Garmin believe it's essential for our products to be easy to | use, and can be lifesaving. Here's a story that shows what we | mean... " Instead the content _reads_ like a story about | someone about to lose their life at sea. It's not a big lift | but would likely make a big change to the perception I (and | apparently others) have of this piece. | renewiltord wrote: | I'm with you. All this cringe culture stuff is really too | much. It's been really annoying lately. Some sort of weird | Puritan outbreak. | asmor wrote: | My next thought was "are Garmin and Gatorade associated?". | chrisdalke wrote: | Amazing story and the pilot of that boat is lucky to be alive. I | think larger center consoles should ship standard with a wireless | safety lanyard instead of a wired one, because very few people | seem to actually use the wired lanyard because it's inconvenient. | this is the exact situation where that would help. | duxup wrote: | This is one of those things that I always wondered about. | | The risks are really apparent though for anyone out on a boat | and it just doesn't seem to be the standard operating procedure | for most folks. | Aeolun wrote: | This is not something I ever considered until I played | Stormworks, and my boat kept running away from me every half | hour. | blamazon wrote: | Wireless lanyard, today I learned! Looks like a complete setup | from 'FELL Marine' can be had for less than 300 bucks. That is | very little money for peace of mind. | StianOvrevage wrote: | I installed the Fell Marine Mob+ myself on my 23 foot day | cruiser a year ago and it works very well. | | The only problem I've had is false positive cut-offs when I'm | on the dock untying or when I prepare to dock and I use the | arm with the wireless FOB on in the rear compartments of the | boat. | | I could probably fix it by angling the antennae so that it | was upright instead of pointing out horizontally behind the | base unit, but TBH it's such a infrequent issue and only | happens at no/low speed anyway that I haven't bothered. | | On the plus side at least I know that it does cut the engine | and probably would in a real situation as well. | pifm_guy wrote: | False negatives are more worrying. On a small speedboat, a | common cause of death is that the captain falls overboard | while the boat is doing a sharp turn at speed. The boat | then does a 360 circle and within 10 seconds runs over the | captain before anyone else in the boat can intervene. | | Will these wireless keyfobs reliably cut out within 10 | seconds when the boat never goes more than say 60 feet from | the captain? I suspect not. | burnished wrote: | Would a wired one that went unused prevent that? That | would seem to be the core problem in your scenario - the | existing technology that would not have a false negative | here is going unused. | | Also, can you cite any sources for that event being | common (relatively at least)? Not that I doubt you | specifically, the scenario is just so horrifying that I | am generally having trouble accepting it. | brk wrote: | Go out with a buddy sometime on a day with a light wind. | Put your boat at a slow cruise and then jump off | (carefully). See if you can actually get back to your boat | before you're exhausted (and need your buddy to pull around | and pick you up). | | In a light wind or current an average boat is still going | to be moving faster than most people can swim. | | The wireless kill switch is good. But pair it with an | inflatable PFD. | blamazon wrote: | It's a tough engineering challenge but it be cool if | there was some kind of collapsible 'foot flippers' (is | there a more technical term?) one could pull out of like | a tube attached to a PFD. | | I was watching the video of that boat that rolled at the | Columbia river outlet in Oregon and the USCG rescue | swimmer was astoundingly fast with the fins on. | StianOvrevage wrote: | That's a very good suggestion actually. It's probably a | very helpful, and I expect humbling, exercise. | | (Have to remember to teach the buddy how to override the | MOB-system so that he can actually start the engine after | I go in the water though, lest it become a real | situation) | chrisdalke wrote: | I use a fanny-pack style autoinflating PFD which actually | comes with a ring to connect the lanyard to. Definitely | agreed you need both. | lazyant wrote: | 60% 1 star ratings on Amazon (failing device), still no peace | of mind but better than nothing :-( | RockRobotRock wrote: | https://xkcd.com/937/ | bsder wrote: | Anyone who buys a _safety system_ from Amazon is completely | out of their gourd. | blamazon wrote: | I was not able to reproduce this result. Can you link? | ghaff wrote: | I assume this. https://www.amazon.com/product- | reviews/B075MMHYMK/ | | Overall the rating is pretty good but definitely a number | of one stars. | | The challenge with a lot of safety and backup systems is | that you might never need them, but if you do need them | they absolutely _have to_ work. | Aeolun wrote: | All the failure modes seem to have to do with the engines | not starting when someone needs them, which sounds ok to | me. | | Or maybe that's survivorship bias, and the ones where the | engines do not properly cut out are never in a position | to review. | blamazon wrote: | For what it's worth I flipped through the 1 star, 2 star, | and 3 star reviews and found one that indicated a false | negative, the rest seemed to indicate false positive. | With it being a predominantly self-installed electrical | system I question if every reviewer's install was done | correctly. | lazyant wrote: | https://www.amazon.ca/product- | reviews/B075MMHYMK/ref=acr_dp_... top result in Canada | blamazon wrote: | That listing has two total ratings, one is 5 star and one | is 1 star, with no textual reviews. Doesn't feel like | useful data to me. | andrewem wrote: | The guy who fell in the water talks about that here: | "Specifically, he wants people to know there are wireless | killswitches available that can attach to passengers as well as | the captain." | | https://www.wwaytv3.com/i-was-going-to-die-man-goes-overboar... | analog31 wrote: | Moreover, the lanyard should include a panic button that sends | out a SOS from the boat's radio. | wil421 wrote: | There's some fishing guys on YouTube I watch and some of them | have an app on their phone to shut the motor off. If they fall | overboard the motor shuts off when the phone isn't close | enough. Some also wear automatically inflated life jackets but | as a kayaker I don't trust them. | malandrew wrote: | IMHO aUrooj inflated life jackets generally make no sense for | kayaking. It's too easy to end up in the drink casually and | it's like $60+ per re-arming kit. | | Are those fishing kayaks so stable that they have very little | expectation of going overboard comparable to being on a | powerboat or sail boat? I use touring and whitewater kayaks | myself. | | I kayak and sail so I have life jackets for both use cases | (two type V rescue jackets for kayaking and 4 type V | inflatables for sailing to accommodate friends and better the | much safer European spinlock deckvests, which are not USCG | approved, so I keep USCG approved inflatables on board too) | sitkack wrote: | > an app on their phone to shut the motor off. | | The failure risk here is the phone doesn't go with you and it | keeps chugging along. | Mixtape wrote: | This is doubled by the fact that lots of boaters will try | to keep their phone as far from the water as possible for | safety's sake. In practice, using your phone is better than | using nothing at all, but a dedicated waterproof device | that you can clip onto your clothes and forget about is by | far the better option. | markdown wrote: | > Some also wear automatically inflated life jackets but as a | kayaker I don't trust them. | | Do you trust them as an adult? Or in some other context? What | about kayaking makes you distrust them? Should I, a non- | kayaker, trust them? | wlll wrote: | I'm a sailor (yachts, not dinghys), not a kayaker. | | > Do you trust them as an adult? | | Yes. The alternative (ignoring the solid foam type of life | jacket that you see kids wear) is a manually inflating one. | They use the same CO2 cylinder with a bladder, but you have | to pull a cord to inflate them. You can buy the exact same | model of life jacket as auto or manual inflating. The auto | inflating ones also have a cord you can pull if you need | to. | | There is some debate in the sailing community as to whether | the auto or manual jackets are a better idea. With the | manual ones you can manoeuvre better in the water if you | don't inflate the jacket so you have a chance to swim to | safety, perhaps climbing back on your boat, but if you get | knocked unconscious or you're in shock (or the boats still | sailing) then that's going to be harder/impossible to do. | | Personally me and my immediate family have auto inflating | ones, this model specifically: | https://crewsaver.com/uk/products/16708/ErgoFit190N. We | have some more basic models for guests. I figure I'm | unlikely to be sailing single handed and the best chance of | survival offshore is getting picked up by the crew of the | boat you were just in. Plus, I'm in NW UK, cold water shock | is a real thing. Staying afloat in the middle of the sea is | going to be the main thing you're going to want to be | concentrating on. | | > Or in some other context? What about kayaking makes you | distrust them? | | I wouldn't wear an auto-inflating jacket anywhere that I'm | likely to get dunked in the water as a matter of course. | You'll just inflate the jacket when you don't want to, it | will be completely in the way and you will have to deflate | it and it's then mostly useless until it's repacked with a | new gas cylinder. Plus, you're unlikely to be in the big | seas that would make an auto-inflater safer. | | That said, it can get wet enough on a sailing yacht that | jackets can get wet enough to be inflated, but that's very | uncommon. Pretty funny though :) | | > Should I, a non-kayaker, trust them? | | It depends what you're doing. Sailing, going out on a | pleasure boat, day trips, weeks at sea, then sure. Stick | one on each of your family and guests, show them the pull | cord and tell them not to pull it unless they need to, and | you can pretty much rest assured that if they fall in | they're going to float until you can get to them. You can | also get beacons you can add to them, I've added them to | mine. | brewdad wrote: | Shouldn't a kayaker already be wearing a PFD? In my state | they are mandatory. They make PFDs that work specifically | with kayaks and their lowered seating. | jdminhbg wrote: | In many states it's mandatory to have one at all times but | not mandatory to be actually worn at all times. | andrewflnr wrote: | Specifically for kayak-related reasons? | Kon-Peki wrote: | Most likely. They are not supposed to trigger when getting | wet, even very wet, but _are_ supposed to trigger when you | go into the water. | | You really shouldn't wear an auto-inflating PFD in a | situation where going into the water isn't 100% a bad | thing. Kayaking seems to be one of those activities where | you wouldn't want it. Even dinghy sailing/racing seems like | a poor use case. | | In case anyone is unfamiliar with them, though, they all | have a manual pull handle that is supposed to trigger the | CO2 canister, and as a 3rd backup they even have a tube you | can pull up to your face and a one-way valve so you can | blow them up with your mouth. | thrill wrote: | 'Jack, a math major at the Naval Academy, has run the numbers | again and again, and it just doesn't make sense. "At some points | I think we were within even half a mile of him," Andrew said, | "but it wasn't until the end that we came onto him.' | | Come on man ... you quit looking once you found him - that's why | it's called 'the end' - no special math required. | umvi wrote: | "The end" could also be the point where they call it quits | regardless of if they found him. | myself248 wrote: | Isn't it weird how things are always in the last place you | look? | squishy47 wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3NTtagBmKY | leeoniya wrote: | the actual saying is "last place you _think_ to look " or | "last place you expect" (because it's so obvious / | uninteresting). but that doesnt make a joke. | brookst wrote: | You can fix this by continuing to look after you've found | something. "Phew, glad my keys were in the first place I | looked, and not the next ten" | moffkalast wrote: | Just in case you find any extra keys to unlock those bonus | rooms, it's just good completionist practice. | wlll wrote: | The Fallout 3 "I'm going to find every last tin can in | this creepy abandoned building" method. | Waterluvian wrote: | It's important not to end the experiment prematurely in | order to obtain a proper set of data. Otherwise we end up | with conclusions like, "it's always in the last place you | look." | lisper wrote: | You never know, there could be more keys. Confirmation | bias is a powerful thing. | scintill76 wrote: | I always do my searches in constant time, to foil timing | attacks. | jahewson wrote: | I like to start with a failing unit test by deliberately | looking for the keys somewhere I know they're not. | wlll wrote: | It's important you do this to defeat timing based attacks | that might try to determine where you usually put your keys | based on the time taken to cut short the search. | dan-robertson wrote: | I find they're often in the first place you look but that you | miss the on the first cursory look. | scruple wrote: | A lot like getting the USB plug right the first time but | not realizing it. Happens every time. | oxfeed65261 wrote: | It's almost always in the Eureka Zone. | | https://nevalalee.wordpress.com/2014/04/19/the-eureka-zone/ | Hendrikto wrote: | > had the Garmin technology been less intuitive for an unfamiliar | boater in a stressful situation -- this story could've ended so | much differently. | | Absolutely shameless... | JumpCrisscross wrote: | Isn't this what we want marketing to be? Informative, empirical | and helpful? | marstall wrote: | tight writing, Garmin.com! | pauldprice wrote: | If I were an SEO manager, Garmin would be the dream job. They get | so much excellent content with real, meaningful stories to tell. | This article is pure SEO gold. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | The inreach rescues always sound like they'd make for good | movie plots! | NegativeLatency wrote: | Nice story but after the whole hacking thing and my own | experiences with their acquisition of delorme I'd steer clear of | Garmin if possible. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23926289 | | https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/4/21353842/garmin-ransomware... | EB-Barrington wrote: | [dead] | akiselev wrote: | Do you plan on avoiding airlines your entire life? Cause Garmin | makes some of the most important avionics. | NegativeLatency wrote: | That's not exactly consumer level gear though is it, my in | reach is not subject to FAA regulations | [deleted] | pibechorro wrote: | Great story, but honestly Garmin is not any better than most | other major brands. They buy out their competition, that's their | "greatness". Navionics is a better chart plotter (which they | bought up) and some of the best features (active captain) where | community sourced info they also bought up. | puterich123 wrote: | The takeaway here is not "Divine intervention" but: A lot of | people fall off boats and die while taking a leak. | benatkin wrote: | Is the author from the UK? "Pile of weed" sounds like marijuana. | I would say "pile of weeds". Like "some weed" vs "some weeds". | Plus https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/another-word- | for/relieve_o... | ajjenkins wrote: | When describing how the boat owner fell off his boat, the author | said it could've happened to anyone, but it sounds like he was | peeing off the side of his boat while the engine was running. | | I don't know, but that sounds pretty dumb to me. | blackoil wrote: | Anyone who travelled on old Indian railway can tell you one | hand to hold the rod and other to hold a rod. | evan_ wrote: | ...And everyone does dumb things once in a while. | spicybright wrote: | Being alone, not being at the controls while you're driving, | dangling near the edge, not wearing a life jacket. | | Just not doing one of those things would have prevented or | drastically improved things. | | He was even a lifeguard and served in the coast guard. It's | easy to get complacent! | akiselev wrote: | It's one of the leading causes of death in boating. | | The leading causes of death in general aviation are the weather | and running out of fuel. | | Humans are pretty dumb. | ghaff wrote: | It's a not unheard of cause of death in the Grand Canyon as | well. Someone gets up to take a pee at night (you're supposed | to pee in the river), maybe they're a bit drunk, and they | fall in and get swept downriver. | hackernewds wrote: | They fall from the grand canyon into the river? that's a | gigantic fall | ghaff wrote: | On river trips when camping at night. | | Though people have also died pretending to fall from the | rim and then they actually do. (You don't normally fall | all the way--the walls aren't that shear--but you fall | far enough.) | bradfitz wrote: | > The story was simple, really, and one that could happen to | almost any boater on any given day. Sascha had gone to the side | to relieve himself and simply fell overboard. | | Almost any boater! | puterich123 wrote: | The takeaway here is not "Divine intervention" it's either: A lot | of people fall off boats and die while taking a leak, or there | are so many people on the ocean, that if you go in a straight | line, you're probably going to meet someone. | tobyjsullivan wrote: | That's not the takeaway _if_ either of those things are true. | I'm not sure there's much evidence supporting either of those | statements. The ocean is huge. | | I'm not a religious person so I'd say this is a happy | coincidence. And coincidences involving rescues make great | stories. | curiousgal wrote: | Is it just me or is the title extremely confusing? Why do writers | do this? | 10x_contrarian wrote: | It's written by the Garmin PR team - their headlines are as | intuitive as their device UIs! | | This article is much better: | https://www.readersdigest.co.uk/inspire/life/how-a-fisherman... | renewiltord wrote: | I understood it first time. What was confusing to you? | | Ghost Boat - Either the craft didn't exist or it has no pilot | | With Garmin GPS - okay, it's the no pilot case | | Leads - Okay, they followed it to a waypoint or they discovered | it motoring aimlessly | | Father-Son Duo - these two were the rescuers, cool | | To Man overboard - okay, pilot fell off the boat | | Definitely clear to me on first read and enough for me to click | through. | lazyant wrote: | as a non-native English speaker, it initially read as | (something boat) causes (father/son) to (go overboard) | 10x_contrarian wrote: | I'm a native english speaker but don't really have a marine | background. I also read it as the father/son somehow going | overboard. | renewiltord wrote: | Fair enough. I can see how you could have reached that | conclusion. I suppose it's written for a native speaker. | | For what it's worth, ChatGPT "comprehends" it correctly so | perhaps one day we can have a headline auto-expander. | sakopov wrote: | I'm not a native speaker either and I think what threw me | off was the "Man Overboard" bit, which is usually used as a | "maritime call" so to speak. So in other words, it wasn't | clear to me who was overboard, the father-son duo or | somebody else. What I think the title should have been is | "Ghost Boat with Garmin GPS Leads Father-Son Duo to a Man | Overboard", notice "a man overboard" to clearly indicate | that they were led to someone who was overboard. | robocat wrote: | It's not your fault: the title is very confusing to me | and my mother tongue is English. Perhaps finding it | confusing is a sign that your English is very good. | myself248 wrote: | Made perfect sense to me, but I think if I didn't already know | "Man-overboard" as a single term made up of two words, I | might've assumed "overboard" modified something else like | "leads" or "duo", and then it would've been quite confusing. | blamazon wrote: | For me it's kinda like those visual illusions that look like a | dog or a duck but never both. When I first saw this title I was | like "the heck is that word salad?" but now after reading the | article I can toggle it from making sense to not making sense. | Duck to dog and back again. | | Postulating as to why writers do this generally - Imagine you | work in Garmin PR and you've been looking at this story, | thinking about this story, sending and receiving emails about | this story, having meetings about this story, etc, for way too | long. It suffuses into the tissue of your brain. The title now | makes perfect sense to you and you're so entrenched that you | can't see it that other way. | | Finally, it's Friday. 4pm. Before a long weekend. You're going | on an amazing trip to the mountains and you're excited to not | think about marine GPS systems for ~72 hours. You've got the | post scheduled. Anton, your coworker, pings you and says "hey, | should we set up some time to talk about potentially reworking | this title? I showed the piece to a friend and they didn't | 'get' the title." You sigh, but dutifully pull up Anton's | calendar and start scrolling, only to realize he's taking all | of next week off and the week after you're going to a | conference to extoll the virtues of marine GPS systems and the | week after that he's going to a conference to extoll the | virtues of marine GPS systems and you're just tired of all | this, so you click the 'thumbs up' emoji, close your laptop, | and the whole thing just vanishes from everyone's mind. It's | the weekend, baby! | dlgeek wrote: | I mean, I get that it's a Garmin press release, but did anyone | else find the inserts about the GPS to be tacky? | lancefisher wrote: | I usually would, but I actually didn't find it tacky in this | article up until the end where the article mentioned they were | so impressed that they upgraded their own boat. That was just a | little bit tacky, but not terrible given it was a press | release. The rest is how I would talk about it while sailing. I | often say "the Garmin" instead of "the chart plotter". | anonymousiam wrote: | If the story is true, why not use it for advertising? | | Here's a link to a similar page for a completely different | product: https://www.valentine1.com/v1-moments/ | eschneider wrote: | Nah. Good PR is where you find it. | myself248 wrote: | Not at all. It's necessary detail for the story to make sense, | and of course Garmin is quite proud that their device played a | role in saving a life. | | I know what they mean about ease of use, too. In the early | 2000's I had a Garmin eTrex GPS receiver, the little | translucent green one. Did a lot of hiking and geocaching with | it, hooked it to my laptop for wardriving, etc. And everything | I ever asked it to do was so easy -- there was no touchscreen | and the click-stick only had five "buttons", but the UI was | just profoundly intuitive. | | I said at the time that if Garmin ever made a cellphone (this | was pre-smartphone and every phone reinvented its own | craptastic UI), I'd buy one in a heartbeat. Of course they did | release some Garmin-branded phones later, well into the Android | era, and the UI is generic Android. So much for that, and | more's the pity. | | But I believe their marine instruments retain some of that old- | fashioned intuition, so anyone could just walk up and figure | out the interface. And that plays a role in the story, so it's | absolutely relevant to mention. | nanidin wrote: | The nuvifone was based on embedded Linux and the UI was | implemented in a mix of Qt and possibly Tcl/Tk. I'm not sure | how much Android played into things, but there was definitely | inspiration from the iPhone. It was the first phone Garmin | put out. | TheRealPomax wrote: | Man, if you can figure out a Garmin just by walking up to one | and figuring out the interface, you have several more degrees | than most people. If you know one, you know most of the | others, but if you know none, and you don't have the manual, | those things are confusing af. | akiselev wrote: | There's UX spillover from their avionics division, which has | indirect funding via NTSB recommending/mandating improvements | after accidents | goldenchrome wrote: | If you made a tool and you found out that someone used your | tool to save someone's life, wouldn't you be proud of yourself | for your good work? What's the harm in sharing the good news? | sudhirj wrote: | A little bit, but hey, they're not hiding anything. Everyone is | allowed to toot their own horn. I'd more pissed if this was | some paid PR piece hidden in a newspaper. | koolba wrote: | To be fair, if the waypoints weren't logged in the Garmin they | would never have found the overboard man. | snozolli wrote: | The waypoints could have been logged in _anything_. Any GPS, | or even a Google location history on a phone they found. | | The heroes of the story are the two men. | | It would be like if someone were about to sucker punch a | woman and you happened to be standing in the way. You're not | a hero, you just happened to be present. | | It's also a type of scare mongering. "You might fall | overboard while peeing, and our product could save your life, | just look at this phenomenally unlikely scenario!" The much | smarter solution is to use a wireless lanyard or just pee | inside the boat, as commented elsewhere here. | neilv wrote: | This was a nice story -- of smart and prepared people, dropping | what they were doing to do the right thing against the odds, with | some luck/divine help, to save someone -- and I think I'm going | to stop online stuff on a high note for this Sunday. :) | almog wrote: | On a tangent -- if you were to find a lost Garmin InReach device, | Garmin won't let you notify its owner: | https://support.garmin.com/en-US/?faq=gpi2lWn8aE0dPyEfx6wQ78 | | Assuming the device has been lost for a while, it's likely that | its subscription is over, thus you cannot use it to contact any | of the previous owner contacts, which makes sense from privacy | perspective, yet I see no reason why Garmin will deliberately not | have any process of notifying the owner once your possession of | the device has been established | californical wrote: | I think that makes sense, many people don't want their contact | info given out to someone who happened to find their lost | device. If they wanted that, they could always just add a | keychain tag with their name and phone number to the device | almog wrote: | I agree and pointed to the fact that it makes sense they | wouldn't let you contact the owner directly and added that | one solution could have been to have Garmin notify the owner | that someone found their device. | | When I lost my PLB (an emergency only type device) I | contacted NOAA to notify them of it so that in case it | accidentally gets activated, COSPAS SARSAT won't send an SAR | team to the midi pyrenees. Not only did they respond within | minutes but they told me that in case someone will find it | and contact them, they can share my details (to which I | happily agreed). | bagels wrote: | Simple solution is for Garmin to accept and reship the device | since they already know the owner? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-02-05 23:00 UTC)