[HN Gopher] Clark Foam's demise, 10 years later (2015) ___________________________________________________________________ Clark Foam's demise, 10 years later (2015) Author : nl Score : 73 points Date : 2023-02-09 08:48 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.surfer.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.surfer.com) | JTbane wrote: | A lot of libertarian-types might say "IT'S THE GOVERNMENT'S | FAULT", but seems like this guy had a ton of potentially | hazardous chemicals lying around to make foam. Those regulations | exist for a reason, resins are very nasty. | JohnFen wrote: | What a fantastic example of how costly monopolies actually are. | gamblor956 wrote: | This article is (and when published, was) a highly revisionist | take on Clark's impact on the surfing industry, and on the | portion of surfboards made and sold by individual shapers. | | Board shops in SoCal were already selling mass-produced | surfboards in 2005 using cheap mass-produced (non-Clark) foam | blanks. I learned to surf on one of those boards. | | Clark's customers (mom-and-pop board shops) asked him to make | improvements to his blanks and his process so they could compete | with the mass-produced boards and he refused. He started losing | business to cheaper, better competitors and decided to just break | all his toys and go off into the woods instead of changing how he | did things. | | This caused a relatively small disruption to the supply of | surfboards, because cheap mass-produced boards were already | available in many stores and high-end boards never used his foam | to begin with. This really just affected the middle-tier mom-and- | pop shops that had based their supply chain around his foams. | Luckily for them, the market for boards is highly seasonal (even | in SoCal), so they were able to find replacement blanks by the | time the 2006 surf season began. | serf wrote: | foam companies have an incredibly shady history in California -- | my dad was the customer of one in the 80s, the owner had hired an | incompetent forklift worker and a huge chemical spill proceeded. | | I remember my dad getting a phone call in the middle of the night | from the owner 20+ years ago : " X, you've always been a great | customer of mine, if you want or need anything I have at the shop | then you're free to come get it _tonight_. " | | We got in the car and got sheet after sheet of urethane foams, we | were using it for aerospace and bicycle stuff at the time, as | well as some small hand tools and miscellaneous stuff that he | offered us. | | The facility was chained and barred that next morning | | A week later the entire facility burned down | | A month later people from the EPA started contacting the owners' | business partners and larger contracts; turns out that after the | fire there was some extensive soil testing, and the owner and | anyone involved was nowhere to be found to be asked to pay for | the extensive environment rehabilitation to deal with (among | other things, i'm sure) the huge chemical spill. | | We never heard from the owner again. I don't know whether or not | the fire was an accident , but even as a kid I just presumed it | was a failed fraudulent cover-up attempt or insurance grab; but I | guess we'll never properly know. | | It wouldn't surprise me in the least bit if Clark Foams shut down | as a preventative measure to avoid a huge EPA hassle for the | owner; making foam is a nasty business, and it's expensive to do | it by-the-book. | beamgirl wrote: | The previous owners of my house are, from what I hear around | town, in hiding from the EPA for kinda similar reasons. All | kinds of interesting mail comes for them, only to be returned | to sender. | AussieWog93 wrote: | To anyone from Australia reading this headline, no relationship | to Clark's Rubber. | klodolph wrote: | There's a weird repetition in the article. | | > This was a strangely ill-conceived mic drop. A gigantic, | misdirected middle finger to the surf world who'd done nothing | but happily line up to purchase Clark Foam's product. | | This appears in the article twice. | bonestamp2 wrote: | I noticed that too. Since the article is from 7 years ago, I | suspected that the site's CSS has changed and that the second | one, since it was all by itself, used to be a pull quote (an | important quotation that is emphasized with large stylized text | as a graphic design element and to draw in readers who are | scrolling the page without reading). | | I looked at the page source, and yes, that second instance has | a CSS style applied to it called "feature-quote". I guess that | style is no longer in their stylesheet, so now it just looks | like a mistaken repetition rather than a pull quote. | projektfu wrote: | I don't like pull-quotes in web articles. Their purpose is to | get you to stop flipping pages in a magazine, where they | serve a real purpose. On a web page they just give you a | spoiler. | mulmen wrote: | Hah, thanks for digging in. I hadn't considered a CSS bug and | figured it was just lazy editing. Bits do rot. | mlyle wrote: | Easy to do when editing. You write a couple impactful sentences | and consider putting them somewhere else, but accidentally | duplicate. | mulmen wrote: | > It's telling that Clark used a fax to announce his closure, in | the year 2005, considering that email had supplanted the fax long | before then. The closure of Clark dragged the American surfboard | industry from the mid-20th century to the late 20th century, and | set the stage for the leaps forward we've made to the 21st. | | Tangent but the first commercial tax service opened in 1865, 11 | years before the telephone was invented. Lindy's law suggests the | fax will outlast email, and surfboards. | zardo wrote: | Afaik the surfboard was invented in pre-european contact | Hawaii, sometime between ~1100-1700. | squokko wrote: | Love reading about these random things. | kurthr wrote: | Ummm (2015)? | | And its about something 10 years before that. Original title: | "Clark Foam's Demise, 10 Years Later" | | It's kinda interesting, but it was 17 going on 18 years ago. | dang wrote: | We've added the year and reverted the title. Thanks! | | (submitted title was "The unexpected shutdown of Clark Foams") | nathanielherman wrote: | I was a kid who started shaping surfboards as a hobby shortly | before this happened. The hectic-ness was real -- it was almost | impossible to find a foam blank afterwards, they were more | expensive, and they felt noticeably lower quality. I thought my | hobby was going to see a quick end. Glad it's turned around over | the years for the better! | jweir wrote: | Clark Foam was a feature of my childhood - we would drive by it | on the way to beach - and my dad would say with some pride that | it is where most of the surfboard foam came from. | | The factory was on Crown Valley at Forbes. The site may have | become a preschool - but it is all gone now and a giant condo | complex is there. | | https://www.ocregister.com/2012/09/27/preschool-approved-for... | | https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5578181,-117.6767446,3a,75y,... | paradygm wrote: | You and I may have crossed paths a few times (grew up around | there in the mid 80s-90s)--Salt Creek beach was our go-to. I | had no idea what Clark Foam did until I was much older (I | wasn't that into surfing), but the 'Clark Foam' name on the | brick wall on the corner is one of those indelible childhood | memories. | keizo wrote: | Surprised to see this here! But awesome. I'm in a parallel, but | much smaller industry of canoe building. I've made a few boards | for fun and I'm honestly so impressed with anyone that makes a | living building boards. It's a skilled craft, super dependent on | builder skill, and yet requires decent volume to make a business | out of it. Hard dirty work. Some is automated, but not to the | extent possible. I have probably the most advanced private | composites shop in Hawaii, sometimes think about making boards, | as there may be room to on shore some production. And who | wouldn't want to make surfboards. But also can't imagine not | loosing money and canoe building already does that well. | m-ee wrote: | An oddity of the market that surprised me when I got into it is | the relatively low price of a hand shaped board. They're | described in the article as high end, and they can be, but odds | are a local shaper can make you something custom for around the | same price or less than mass manufactured boards like FireWire, | Lost etc. Only issue is you'll have to wait for it to be made. | keizo wrote: | Yeah exactly, I don't know how people do it. Other than doing | it has a hobby or 2nd job, very hard to make a business out | of it. | elbigbad wrote: | This was a strangely ill-conceived mic drop. | jeffrallen wrote: | You can say that again. | orf wrote: | https://bendmagazine.com/foam-on-the-range/ | | Looks like Clark is doing ok! | mlyle wrote: | Reading the article, I thought Clark's actions were completely | unjustified, etc. | | But it really seems he did quit because of a protracted dispute | with local fire and air quality district personnel that was | escalated to the EPA. The threat of massive fines was looming | bigger and bigger, and the letter he writes just exudes | desperation that he didn't feel he could reach compliance. | JohnFen wrote: | As the article says, nobody really took issue with him | quitting. They took issue with him pulling a scorched-earth | approach on his way out. | mlyle wrote: | His letter explains that he wasn't selling tooling because | he feared downstream liability. | jessaustin wrote: | The shapers who bought the blanks and their customers in | turn share his responsibility for whatever environmental | damage his manufacturing caused. Any inconvenience they | suffered was deserved. Polluters love to run this "won't | somebody think of the customers?!" bullshit to defend the | indefensible. | retcond wrote: | I'm much more in in why nobody is apparently interested in | the history of anti competitive business practices | including product dumping and downstream supply chain | hostage taking, that this article almost implies have been | accepted eccentricities of Clark for reasons unspecified | but implied to have something of a cult worship element | involved. | Overtonwindow wrote: | This headline needs (2015) added to it. | Nzen wrote: | and use the original headline (assuming no A/B testing) "Clark | Foam's Demise, 10 Years Later" | mlsu wrote: | For those unfamiliar with surfboard construction: | | A surfboard is made from a foam core, with a stiff polyurethane | coated fiberglass wrapped around the foam. This is what makes | surfboards lightweight but fairly strong. To make a surfboard, | you first shape the foam by cutting and sanding it into the | desired shape (shaping). Then you lay several layers of | fiberglass cloth over the shaped foam and pour the resin over the | cloth (glassing). | | It's something of a craft -- the quality of shapers and glassers | varies a lot. And there is no scientific "best" shape for a | board, so it's completely up to the shaper to make a board that | works. Nowadays many boards are CNC shaped, then finished off by | hand, rather than being entirely hand-shaped. | | Clark Foam manufactured the foam core, a.k.a. the "blank," which | is a pre-cut piece of stiff foam that is shaped down into the | final board. | smackeyacky wrote: | Do they still have wooden "stringers" and whatnot in them? It's | been a while since I looked at one. | tjknoth wrote: | yeah usually, there are some stringerless constructions but | they aren't super popular ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-02-10 23:00 UTC)