[HN Gopher] Roman church decorated with 4k skeletons ___________________________________________________________________ Roman church decorated with 4k skeletons Author : samizdis Score : 137 points Date : 2023-02-10 13:42 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com) | DoingIsLearning wrote: | There are plenty of chapels and crypts filled with bone/skull | walls throughout catholic Europe, the author makes it look like | this is quite unique and limited to three locations which is not | entirely true. | jdthedisciple wrote: | Excuse me sir, but now you're making it look like they are | ubiquitous. | | Pretty sure that's not the case either. | | So I appreciate this post, first time I hear of this. | jansan wrote: | If you want to see one of these places, I can recommend | Sedlec Ossuary in Kutna Hora / Czech Republic. I contains | about 50,000 skeletons, which basically make up all the | interior decoration. It is interesting how you get used to | being surrounded by skeletons. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedlec_Ossuary | | Edit: They also have a very nice gothic cathedral, a modern | art museum and a silver mine that was turned into a museum in | that city. | wazoox wrote: | Kutna Hora is incredible. There are 2 large gothic | cathedrals there, 1 km from each other. The first one (next | to the ossuary) has many martyrs skeletons clothed in gold | and jewels, offered to the church by the Pope back in the | 1500s (these are supposedly dead Romans from late Empire; | their martyrdom is probably questionable). | | The other cathedral has the most bizarre roof, one third | roof, one third domes, one third bell tower, and a | wonderful organ well worth the visit, and many beautiful | frescoes depicting the work that made this place so rich : | silver mining. | owlninja wrote: | The first time I ever visited Prague we took an unplanned | (no research) day trip to Kutna Hora just to see the bone | church. The other cathedral down the street was amazing | as well, but then to just be stumbling through the town | and coming upon St. Barbara's Church was truly an | experience. It got me hooked to continue travelling | outside the US. | xorcist wrote: | That chandelier is really something extra! | 988747 wrote: | Found one in Poland as well: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_Chapel | | EDIT: and in Portugal https://www.ancient- | origins.net/ancient-places-europe/story-... | | And in Czech Republic: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedlec_Ossuary | | And in Peru: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basilica_and_Conve | nt_of_San_Fr... | | And another list with 40 entries: | https://www.atlasobscura.com/lists/definitive-guide-to- | ossua... | hef19898 wrote: | The crypts under Stefans Dom in Vienna are well worth a | visit. To cite a kid during my visit: "Is grand pa looking | like thatvas well now?" | | Also, there are the Parus catacombs. | tinglymintyfrsh wrote: | Paris, I hope. | | There's a bag at the exit for visitors to return | "souvenirs" if they change their mind. | ginko wrote: | If you're in Vienna you could also check out the | Michaelergruft. | LawnGnome wrote: | I've been to the Portugese Chapel of Bones in Evora. The | two things that really struck me were the sheer size of it | -- I expected a tiny room, and instead it was a decently | sized chapel -- and how every skull essentially looked the | same. A stark reminder of how similar we all are in the | end. | [deleted] | Wojtkie wrote: | I've actually visited this place! It was a very informative visit | and had a great museum attached. I found a lot of it beautiful | glasss wrote: | Oh man I thought it was 4K as in resolution and I was confused | and intrigued. | karaterobot wrote: | Same here. I thought "wow, 4K skeletons? That's pretty hi- | death." | shadowgovt wrote: | I was really tired of putting up with those standard | definition skeletons. | stewx wrote: | And here I am with 1080 skeletons in my house. | ndr wrote: | Milan has its own: | | > In 1210, when an adjacent cemetery ran out of space, a room was | built to hold bones. A church was attached in 1269. Renovated in | 1679, it was destroyed by a fire in 1712. A new bigger church was | then attached to the older one and dedicated to Saint Bernardino | of Siena. | | Some pictures here: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Bernardino_alle_Ossa | cloudify wrote: | On a similar vein, if you visit Milan, go see "San Bernardino | alle ossa", little known but quite worth a visit! | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Bernardino_alle_Ossa#/medi... | martyvis wrote: | A former primary school colleague (we met 50 years ago next | year!) and his daughter wrote a pretty decent book on death | anxiety - "Mortals: How the Fear of Death Shaped Human Society" | https://good-grief.com.au/mortals-with-ross-and-rachel-menzi... | racl101 wrote: | I would not sleep in that room. | Earw0rm wrote: | So many metal album covers in this. | [deleted] | milleramp wrote: | I wonder how they mount them to the wall and ceiling? | ubermonkey wrote: | The previous skeletons, which were rendered in traditional HD, | have been moved to a less expensive media market. | dylan604 wrote: | James Cameron would be proud as they're even in 3D | CharlesW wrote: | Related tip for submitters: When HN's title processing | inadvertently adds ambiguity, you can edit it immediately after | to improve it. | | (Original title is, "Decorated With 4,000 Skeletons, This Roman | Church Will Have You Pondering Your Own Mortality", too long | for HN) | martin-adams wrote: | Let's hope there's no ghosting though | VadimPR wrote: | Beautiful place. The crypt includes a quote that really resonates | with you - translated to English - "you are what we were; you | will be what we are" | soco wrote: | "Wherever you go, death follows, as a body's shadow." (in the | Paris catacombs) | parabyl wrote: | Truly beautiful place, and one of the more interesting museums | I visited in Rome in terms of artifacts and such on display. | [deleted] | peter422 wrote: | "Look alive, see these bones | | What you are now, we were once | | But just like we are, you'll be dust | | And just like we are, permanent" | | -Nada Surf "See These Bones" | beezlebroxxxxxx wrote: | Reminds me of some lines in the final stanza of Tennyson's | _Ulysses_ : | | Tho' much is taken, much abides; and tho' / We are not now that | strength which in old days / Moved earth and heaven, that which | we are, we are; | pastor_bob wrote: | Interesting thing about this place is that's it's illegal to | decorate with Human Remains in Italy now, so if a bone falls off | the wall, they legally can't put it back! | smegsicle wrote: | though there is a convenient loophole known as the 'five second | rule' | bmj wrote: | "You will become what I am." (https://death-to-the- | world.myshopify.com/products/you-will-b...) | boredemployee wrote: | these photos make me anxious for unknown reasons | fishtacos wrote: | You know why. | boredemployee wrote: | do I | busyant wrote: | My wife and I visited this place about 20 years ago. | | I remember a woman from Wisconsin laughing and proclaiming, _" We | Lutherans would never do anything like this!"_ | parabyl wrote: | Similar story, when I visited there was a school group from | Northern Ireland talking about "The catholics were brutal | weren't they!" | inglor_cz wrote: | A very similar place: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedlec_Ossuary | | The bones belong to about 40 thousand people. Realizing that this | enormous boneyard is, by size, equivalent to 0,6 per cent of the | Holocaust, is extremely sobering. | photochemsyn wrote: | A great many people are incredibly uncomfortable with the idea of | death, and installations like this, and similar works of art, are | a great antidote. Accepting death as the price of life might be a | bit difficult for people raised in a culture that worships | perpetual youth and which dreams of immortality, perhaps in the | form of a digital silicon upload, but it's really a sign of | maturity. | | Taking a minute or so out of every day to meditate upon the | inevitablity of your own death is good for one's mental health - | and can be motivating. If there's something you want to do, do it | now - tomorrow is not guaranteed! | mc32 wrote: | There are some cultures that believe the remains of their | ancestors are sacred. How would you encourage them to accept | your POV? | NoZebra120vClip wrote: | Roman Catholic culture is one of those by far. What better | way to attest to the sacredness of human remains but to | incorporate them into the most sacred architecture we have? | | Human remains of Catholics are buried until their cause for | canonization calls for exhumation and examination of the | relics. By the time of canonization, division of the relics | has begun and they are distributed for veneration to various | communities and places. This is how we treat sacred remains: | by making them accessible to all the faithful for viewing, | veneration, and inspiration. | | What was your question again? | timeon wrote: | > Human remains of Catholics are buried until | | Until your family stops paying for the grave. Then someone | else will get the place. | mc32 wrote: | And for those who aren't Catholic, or any religion or | spirituality that doesn't have this interpretation? | photochemsyn wrote: | Do you mean, for example: | | https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2018/11/01/respect- | for... | | > "Respect for dead bodies manifests itself in diverse | ways in different cultures around the world.In Islamic | law and Muslim cultures, burying the dead in the ground | is the correct way to respect dead bodies. Cremation is | prohibited under Islamic law because, unlike in some | cultures, it is considered a violation of the dignity of | the human body." | | People from different cultures have to learn to respect | one another's traditions if they're to live together in | democratic societies, that's certainly true. Some people | would instead destroy anything that offends their own | particular views, unfortunately. | akomtu wrote: | A stable society stands on a set of shared principles, | not on blind respect of each other traditions, no matter | what those are. | | That no-cremation rule was made for a good reason, but | that reason can't be explained to masses, hence the "just | do what the sacred book tells you!" A dead body isn't | completely dead, so it's better (more respectful, indeed) | to keep it for two months, and then it can be burnt. But | you can't keep the rotting corpse for so long due to | diseases, so it's better to bury it, and once it's there | it's silly to dig it out and burn. To skip these endless | arguments, and the futile attemps to reason with common | folk, the instructions are put into a sacred book. | vintermann wrote: | I don't think that's how it happened. You can make | arguments for all sorts of burial practices. | | It was a classic argument, recounted by Herodotus: | | _When Darius was king, he summoned the Greeks who were | with him and asked them what price would persuade them to | eat their fathers' dead bodies. They answered that there | was no price for which they would do it. Then he summoned | those Indians who are called Callatiae, who eat their | parents, and asked them (the Greeks being present and | understanding by interpretation what was said) what would | make them willing to burn their fathers at death. The | Indians cried aloud, that he should not speak of so | horrid an act._ | | Herodotus used this anecdote, rather dubiously I think, | it as an argument that everyone should stick to their own | customs and not think too much about what other people | do. But I think Darius himself, if it actually happened, | used it more as an argument for tolerance, agnosticism - | and cruelty. | | Because it's a bit cruel to shock the poor Greeks and | Callatiae like that, isn't it? And rulers of most large | (and thus multicultural) empires always seemed to be a | bit on the cruel side to me. | | What do you do, when you encounter people, for whom | everything you consider important, sacred, _meaningful_ , | just doesn't register at all, and they care about | completely different things? Do you shut it out? Or do | you allow yourself to drift towards indifference and | nihilism, that maybe none of that stuff matters at all? | | As I recall, Popper called it "the strain of | civilization", how it gnaws on people to have to deal | with so many people who don't share their basic values of | what's important in life. And how they can resort to | isolationism and cruelty to cope with it. | | The Christian church's innovation was to seek a tight | core of meaningful beliefs, with divine justifications of | course, but be fairly tolerant of more secondary sources | of meaning, those coming from custom and culture. Like | Paul, who insisted that no food was forbidden to eat, | even food that had been served up to idols, but that he'd | nonetheless respect the dietary customs of the people he | ate with because it was important to them ("Therefore, if | what I eat causes my brother to stumble, I will never eat | meat again, so that I will not cause him to fall.") | | It was really the first truly multicultural faith, since | up to then, faith, customs and culture had been one and | the same. | | So it's not so out of character, really, that the | Catholic church a few years ago ruled that the Madagascar | custom of exhuming the dead and dancing with them wasn't | contrary to the faith, since it was "just" a cultural | practice and didn't necessarily imply any beliefs | incompatible with Christianity. | prewett wrote: | I don't think viewing religious tradition as "we don't | want to explain our reasoning to you plebs" is doing | justice to the religion. | | I believe Catholicism does have a reason that is | understandable by common folk: since Jesus will resurrect | the faithful to be with him in the new heavens, earth, | and Jerusalem (which are seen as physical, not an | abstract "Heaven" like modern American evangelicals tend | to see it), there needs to be a body to resurrect. | | (I'm not Catholic and never sure what Catholics actually | believe, so I might be wrong here) | NoZebra120vClip wrote: | Well, formulated negatively, it can be said that the | Church historically discouraged/forbade cremation because | it has been employed by people to mock and deny the | doctrine of the Resurrection. | | More practically, it is a practice which unnecessarily | damages the sacred bodily remains and prevents them from | future veneration. So it's much more difficult, if | someone should become a saint, to distribute relics of a | cremated body rather than bones and significant, | identifiable parts of a buried/exhumed body. | | It's not like God won't find a way to resurrect bodies | that have been dismembered, burned, disintegrated, | destroyed, or what have you. He's God, it's no big deal. | Glorified bodies are understood to be spiritual, | otherworldly, and beyond our imagination, but there's | also been a lot of work to describe what they're like and | how they work. | | Cremation also led to abhorrent practices such as | scattering ashes, or keeping them on a mantle, and in | modern times, turning them into personal jewelry or | launching them into space. The Church didn't like that | stuff either. Personally speaking, my dear uncle's | cremains are on my cousin's mantle and essentially | inaccessible to me, since we're not on speaking terms. | I'd really like to visit my uncle's grave, but _he doesn | 't have one!_ | | So even today, the Church forbids cremation if it's for | the wrong reasons. But it's tolerated widely because it's | often cheaper and expedient. | s1artibartfast wrote: | A stable Society stands on shared principles, but those | shared principles need not intrude into every aspect of | life. In fact, I believe a stable Society is one which is | very careful about which values it selects as universal | [deleted] | user3939382 wrote: | "Who promised you tomorrow?" - St. Alphonsus Liguori, | Preparation for Death | Aeolun wrote: | In some ways, the 10000+ previous days of my life are a | fairly reasonable promise of tomorrow. | tspike wrote: | Gambler's fallacy | [deleted] | akomtu wrote: | In a randomly sampled million individuals, what's the | probability of any of them surviving another day? | | The gambler fallacy talks about a gambler who has won and | believes that the cause that made him win is long | lasting. But a living man is right to believe that he is | alive due to forces that have a lot of momentum and won't | vanish suddenly. The fallacy would be assuming that the | man is exempt from accidents, that are unpredictable. | skeaker wrote: | "Okay, wow. You don't want me to kill you because you | have so much to live for? Umm, sunk cost fallacy, heard | of it?" | brookst wrote: | "No, no, I have an MBA, I'd never fall for sunk cost. I'm | all in on the 'I'll travel the world and do all the crazy | fun stuff after I retire' fallacy." | jl6 wrote: | They say past performance does not guarantee future | results... | darkarmani wrote: | No guarantee but it is a good predictor on a long | timeframe. | [deleted] | BeFlatXIII wrote: | Being born is a death sentence. | BizarreByte wrote: | Some would say it's incredibly cruel to bring new life into | existence for that very reason. | Luc wrote: | See interesting philosophy books 'Every Cradle is a | Grave' and 'Better Never to Have Been'. Not for the | easily depressed reader. | BizarreByte wrote: | Not for the easily depressed person and definitely not | for the already depressed, but I consider them worth | reading. It's an interesting perspective one isn't likely | to encounter very much, if ever. | gerdesj wrote: | Yet those same people (whomever they are) continue to | perpetuate their own "cruel" existence. | bialpio wrote: | You can try to do the best you can with the hand you got | dealt but still wish you weren't at the table. | BizarreByte wrote: | The human mind makes it very hard for people to do | anything but continue living. It takes an unbelievable | amount of effort to overcome the natural safeguards our | brain has built in. Someone can hate their life, find it | exceptionally cruel, yet find themselves unable to end | said life despite not waiting to live it. | | That aside, you can tolerate or even enjoy life while | understanding that for many it's an absolutely awful | experience they had no say in partaking in. | brookst wrote: | The living can consent | s1artibartfast wrote: | Some people would say that, and in some cases they would | be right. I don't particularly believe it to be true, but | it is an interesting thought experiment | scns wrote: | The mind is great at birthing warped antinatural | thoughts. Life has so many beatiful facets, if we allow | ourselves to see them. Our conscious mind gets to | perceive what passed our belief-filters. It's worth | trying out new ones. Saying so as a depressed, anti- | everything punk radiating hatred turned annoyingly | positive optimist, who prefers ugly truths to comforting | lies. Got there with a willingness to question my own | behaviour, accept criticism (gifts) and taking | responsibility for my screwups over two decades. | echelon wrote: | People were never seriously interested in extending their | lives. I submit that there's a pretty easy, macabre (to most) | way to go about it: | | Monoclonal antigen-free body farms. Grow human bodies in labs | -- farmed donor bodies -- and get good at head transplants. | | This cures most cancers, most diseases, skipping the | complicated molecular biology we've yet to solve for. | | Literally replace your whole body as it ages. You can renew | the thymus (big!), circulatory, pulmonary system, etc. It | would have a rejuvenating affect on the brain. You'd probably | give humans 150-year lifespans with it. Be able to run | marathons in your 70's. | | We'd suck at head transplants for decades (reducing patient | outcomes in the initial period), but over time could probably | get quite good at it. Initial patient populations could be | recruited from terminal cancer patients, where the cancers | have not spread to the blood or brain tissues. Survival rates | would be low, and a lifetime of paralysis would likely be the | penalty for the first decade or so of patients. But in time, | we'd get better. Eventually to the point where it was no | longer an emergency procedure, but a preventative maintenance | measure. | | The ancillary tech that would spring up from this would be in | the BCI domain and we'd start getting good at modeling brain | states. A whole industry of related organismal-level biotech | advances would arise, propelling us forward like a new space | age (or AI wave, to reference a current trend of advances). | | There are crazy other things you could do - race and gender | changes, better than natural genes and performance (VO2 max | etc) enhancements, transgenic stuff, etc. Why limit ourselves | to our previous limitations? | | In 200 years we could conceivably move human thoughts onto | silicon and stop dying. Too late for us with present day | "life extension" / "health span" prognosis, so nobody is | trying. | | But it's "icky" and you'd get an even worse reaction than | artists take to AI art or certain greens take to nuclear. The | "people should die" folks raise their pitchforks, as do the | incredibly religious. It's a very tough pill to swallow. | | It angers me, because it's pretty low hanging fruit. You | could grow bodies as vegetables without brains. Cut them off | in development genetically and surgically. Innervate and | artificially grow the bodies in advanced farms that keep | their muscles moving, their hormones and limbic systems | pumping, etc. | | If I make a billion dollars I'll put everything into it. I | want to live 150 years, and I want everyone else to as well. | It's way more important to me than buying stuff or collecting | "experiences". | | As it stands, there's little point to anything we do (despite | the fact none of us behave this way). Our experiences and | enjoyment are short-lived dopamine hits to decaying neural | networks, which on the geologic time scale, are pathetic | little flashes that will never be noticed or remembered. When | our brain cells bleb and desiccate, they won't remember all | the good times we had or money we spent. | | My perspective is we're all already dead. We may as well be | holograms of our machine descendants playing out historical | recreations. | | Anyway, we could solve this if we put ourselves to it. I've | yet to meet anyone else that's so gung-ho about it. I just | think we're too early. And to this decaying neural network, | it's kind of a horror to watch how others deal with the fact. | voldacar wrote: | I mostly agree with this. But the real problem is a meta- | problem. Which is that society will never allow this unless | everybody becomes some kind of moral nihilist ubermensch | overnight. Any kind of (recognizable) deontology would have | to be left behind completely. And the socially enforced | "ick" reflex (which is MASSIVELY strong in most of the | population) is something that can really be overcome only | by people who are far right-tail in terms of intelligence | or creativity or imagination. Read your comment to the | average person on the street and see how they reflexively | react. People on this site routinely overestimate the | quality of the average human (in literally every possible | way) because they only work and interact with above average | people. I just don't see how we get from here to there, at | least not without some massive alteration of humans, which | would only really possible with true BCI or some kind of | extreme eugenics effort. But in a world where either of | those were possible, head transplanation would be a breeze. | brookst wrote: | Paris Catacombs are also amazing for this. First few skeletons | are yikes. Next 50 are unsettling. Next 500 are sobering. Next | 5,000 start to be kind of interesting, starting to notice | variations in bone and joint shapes. Next 50,000 start to | resemble the other people walking with you, just more naked. | It's a good experience. | whatshisface wrote: | I don't know about you but seeing a big pile of skeletons in a | basement mainly serves to confirm the ideas about death that I | already had. | | It's also kind of misleading because they're not complaining | but dying is actually pretty awful unless you're really, really | lucky. | brookst wrote: | Wait, is it lucky if you're aware of your last moments or | lucky if you're not? | whatshisface wrote: | It depends on the moments, really. | clhodapp wrote: | Personally, I find a lot of truth in what you say but I | vehemently disagree with the premise that we should accept | death as the price of life. | | Of course, we need to be realistic and acknowledge that | everyone living will all almost certainly die one day but that | doesn't mean that we shouldn't strive for a future without | death. | | I think that CGP Grey's video, Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant, does | a wonderful job arguing this viewpoint. | brookst wrote: | I admire striving to not die. | | Statistically, I fully expect to die. Never dying would be a | fantastic surprise. | | I think acceptance is a lot healthier and more likely to | produce happiness in life than thinking one may be an | exception. | kiba wrote: | Why not both? | Mystery-Machine wrote: | There's a difference between "thinking one may be an | exception" and realizing that, no matter how small, there | is a chance that one day we'll invent the technology that | will make us immortal (to some extent). | | If we had the same stance for all the other things that | never happened before and were considered impossible, we | would have never went to space and achieved many other | great firsts. | anigbrowl wrote: | All things have an extent, the urge to forget this is | regressive imho.Books/TV shows that never ended seemed highly | desirable when I was young, but infinite potential arguably | means nothing matters. | belval wrote: | The Paris catacombs, while lacking the Catholic aspect really | resonated with me. There is something so incredibly humbling in | looking at literally million of skulls and realizing that we are | ultimately as insignificant as they were. | xwdv wrote: | Not being able to comprehend their significance is not the same | as them being insignificant. | junon wrote: | ... missing the point entirely. | 1970-01-01 wrote: | They should upscale these to 8K using AI. | budzes wrote: | Similar church in Czech Republic: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedlec_Ossuary | | The Sedlec Ossuary is a Roman Catholic chapel, located beneath | the Cemetery Church of All Saints, part of the former Sedlec | Abbey in Sedlec, a suburb of Kutna Hora in the Czech Republic. | | The ossuary is estimated to contain the skeletons of between | 40,000 and 70,000 people, whose bones have, in many cases, been | artistically arranged to form decorations and furnishings for the | chapel. | tobyjsullivan wrote: | The article presents so much mystique around the origin of the | artful arrangement. | | All I could think while reading is this is what happens when the | head friar tells the new kid, "the crypt has become a complete | mess, can you head down there and make it nice?" And then doesn't | check in on his progress. | Hikikomori wrote: | Visited it by accident the first day in Rome, just happened to | walk by. They have a museum before the crypt where each room had | some theme and used different bones. Not particularly religious | but it was interesting to see. Seemed like someone spent time in | their crypt and had too much time and bones on their hands. | Barrin92 wrote: | I went to a Catholic school growing up, my parents weren't | religious and I largely had no relationship to the faith but one | thing that always fascinated me growing up was the old, imposing | Gothic church that the students celebrated mass in, which as a | kid always was a little bit scary to me. | | This church with death on display reminds me of that and to me | what's always been striking is that there's almost a pagan or | occult undercurrent in Catholicism. I think Midnight Mass, a | great show btw, captures this as well. Trying to show how much of | an actual blood ritual the Catholic Eucharist is. (in Catholicism | bread and wine are taken to be transformed into literally(!), not | figuratively the blood and body of Christ). | | Also wherever Catholicism mixes with folk traditions this is | visible, with figures like Santa Muerte in Latin America. And | while the Catholic church usually distances itself from this, | it's always interesting how easily these traditions blend. | hprotagonist wrote: | 46. Keep death daily before your eyes. | | Rule of St Benedict | | https://gutenberg.org/cache/epub/50040/pg50040-images.html#c... | 6502nerdface wrote: | Personally, I hang a "memento mori" near every mirror in the | house, to remind him who would regard himself that what he sees | will one day inevitably return to the earth. | bruce343434 wrote: | That seems rather anxiety inducing. "Remember that you will | die" is the saying, not "be obsessed with it". | 6502nerdface wrote: | Mostly they're just cool as works of art :). Still lifes | with skulls and such. | darkarmani wrote: | Stoic praemeditatio malorum. | capableweb wrote: | This has helped me a lot to (what it feels like) take care more | about what I spend my time on. | | As extra help, I have a printed page from | https://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05/life-weeks.html of the final | "Your Life in Weeks" image which I fill out every week. Puts | yet another perspective on the very same thing. | | Some people when they see it feel like it's macabre or | stressful but it has the opposite effect on me, especially when | dealing with problems that in hindsight are trivial. | TheFreim wrote: | 5:00AM every morning I receive a reminder on my phone: "You | will die someday." | brookst wrote: | I get text messages like that. Still don't know who it is. | brainlessdev wrote: | From Marcus Aurelius's _Meditations_ : Mortal | man, you have lived as a citizen in this great city. What matter | if that life is five or fifty ears? The laws of the city apply | equally to all. So what is there to fear in your dismissal from | the city? This is no tyrant or corrupt judge who dismisses you, | but the very same nature that brought you in. It is like the | officer who engaged a comic actor dismissing him from the stage. | 'But I have not played my five acts, only three.' 'True, but in | life three acts can be the whole play.' Completion is determined | by that being who caused first your composition and now your | dissolution. You have no part in either causation. Go then in | peace: the god who lets you go is at peace with you. | | I find the idea frightening but at the same time soothing: life | is something one returns, like anything else one could have, one | day it will no longer be there; it needs to be returned. | [deleted] | steveBK123 wrote: | It's interesting how in less modern times, death was more ever | present and yet they still went out of their way to remind people | about it. | | The modern world by contrast, one can go well into their 30s | without personally being touched by it in your family/friends | circle. We could use the reminder of it now more than then, and | yet we sanitize & Disney-fy everything instead. | sbaiddn wrote: | Im nearing 40 and the only person "close" to me that has died | is my grandpa, but I barely knew him since I grew up half way | around the world. | | As an (immature) adult I saw him twice. Twice as a teen. Once | as a child post-migration. | | I loved him so dearly as a young child yet, when he passed, it | barely registered. | monero-xmr wrote: | Catholics believe in "incorruptibility" as a sign of potential | sainthood. This is where the body does not decompose. You can see | the bodies on display | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorruptibility | | Catholics also believe in demonic possession, hell, and exorcism. | Not the first things a priest will tell you though :) | sorokod wrote: | They also believe in a three person god. Not sure in which | lesson this comes up. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church#Nature_of_God | Grazester wrote: | God the son, God the father and God the holy spirit(The | trinity). Also mention in pray and referenced in the bible I | believe. | krapp wrote: | No, the Trinity is never referenced in the Bible - God, | Jesus and the Holy Spirit are always treated as separate | entities. The doctrine was made up by the Church to avoid | the obvious polytheistic implications in the | straightforward interpretation of canon. | jlkuester7 wrote: | The Catholic Church has never claimed the Bible is the | sole source of religious revelation. Sacred Tradition is | regarded and an additional (and not contradictory) source | of revelation of the mysteries of God. | | I am by no means well versed in the deep trinitarian | studies and reflections from the past 2000 years, but I | am inclined to feel that verses like John 10:30 defy a | simple explanation.... | aeneasmackenzie wrote: | Jesus and the Father are equated in the very first verse | of John. | dc-programmer wrote: | The conception of the trinity as co-equal persons of the | same substance is a later development in Christianity. | The earliest Christian writings (Paul's letters) never | mention the trinity; you could even argue Paul was a sort | of binitarian | krapp wrote: | "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with | God, and the Word was God" isn't exactly straightforward. | olddustytrail wrote: | It's more straightforward if you read a few more | sentences. | krapp wrote: | Not really. It could just as easily be interpreted as | referring to two separate beings of equal power and | status than one being in two persons. | | John 10:30 mentioned above seems more clear, but just | prior to that you have "My Father who has given them to | Me", which makes no sense if they are literally the same | being. Neither does Christ on the cross asking why God | has forsaken him. | | The problem is the Biblical canon manifested out of what | were countless differing philosophies and schools of | thought in early Christianity, and John seems to be one | of the more mystical books to make it in. But | Christianity couldn't even agree on the nature of Jesus' | divinity at first, and went to war against itself for | centuries over details like this. | geocrasher wrote: | Philippians 2:5,6 clears it up nicely. | nsxwolf wrote: | In any sort of Catholic education, this is learned | immediately. | bombcar wrote: | I mean this stuff is literally laid out in the Creed which | is recited at every mass and various times besides. There | are various other Creeds used that make things even more | explicit such as the Athanasian Creed. And nothing really | is unique to the Catholics, the Orthodox are onboard for | this stuff. | | I believe in one God, | | the Father almighty, | | maker of heaven and earth, | | of all things visible and invisible. | | I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, | | the Only Begotten Son of God, | | born of the Father before all ages. | | God from God, Light from Light, | | true God from true God, | | begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father; | | through him all things were made. | | For us men and for our salvation | | he came down from heaven, | | and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, | | and became man. | | For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, | | he suffered death and was buried, | | and rose again on the third day | | in accordance with the Scriptures. | | He ascended into heaven | | and is seated at the right hand of the Father. | | He will come again in glory | | to judge the living and the dead | | and his kingdom will have no end. | | I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, | | who proceeds from the Father and the Son, | | who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, | | who has spoken through the prophets. | | I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. | | I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins | | and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead | | and the life of the world to come. Amen. | nsxwolf wrote: | Yeah, non-trinitarian Christianity is Mormons, Jehovas | Witnesses, and it gets much more obscure from there. | 988747 wrote: | Neither Mormons nor Jehovas Witnesses are considered | Christians. | nsxwolf wrote: | Probably because they're non-trinitarian. | BizarreByte wrote: | The trinity is a fundamental Christian belief, not just | Catholic. If one doesn't believe it than most won't consider | them Christian. This is a huge reason why Mormonism is it's | own thing. | | I don't believe anymore as an adult, but this was taught | right away when I was a kid going to the Catholic Church. I | don't think you could find a catholic who doesn't know what | the trinity is. | sorokod wrote: | Not religious in any way - from this perspective the | trinity (as nailed down by the council of Nicaea) sounds | like a triumvirate of gods + mental acrobatics. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea#Agend | a | duped wrote: | It's an interesting historical and political question | though, since it was the core question of the First Council | of Nicea which Constantine used to establish an orthodoxy | for his empire. That single church lasted for almost 700 | years before splitting in two. | timeon wrote: | There was already split when Paul joined the church. Just | those original Jewish branches (like Ebionites) did not | survived to this age. | dragonwriter wrote: | > That single church lasted for almost 700 years before | splitting in two. | | It...didn't, though; there was a schism (Macedonian) | within 7 years, not 700, of Nicaea, and there were even | schisms that created separate long-lasting Churches on | the side rejecting the view of the part of the Church | that survived in union until the Catholic/Orthodox split | much sooner than 700 years (e.g., the Nestorian schism in | 431 and the Church of the East which survives to this | day; the Chalcedonian/Monophysite schism in 451, from | which the Oriental Orthodox churches still survive, etc.) | dc-programmer wrote: | The trinity is the Orthodox belief. The history of | Christianity is full of "heretical" beliefs about the | Godhead. Also there is solid evidence that first century | Christians did not hold a trinitarian position | [deleted] | rsynnott wrote: | Most people who identify as Catholic in developed countries | today don't believe in any of those (demonic possession and | exorcism would be particularly fringe, but in surveys in many | countries the majority identifying as Catholic don't believe in | hell or sometimes transubstantiation either) | [deleted] | User23 wrote: | There certainly are plenty of cultural Catholics who don't | believe much of if anything that the Church teaches. The | example of possession is particularly interesting though, | because it's so overt. Unlike transubstantiation, where we | have to take it on faith, there are documented cases of | demonic possession that really defy natural explanation. | Things like knowing secrets, speaking unknown languages, | levitation, feats of strength, and so on have all been | observed. Here[1] is one example and you can find many more, | including from non-Catholic or even non-Christian specialists | who have been retained to rule out mental illness and other | natural explanations. Unfortunately it is a rather | sensationalized subject, so there is a lot of garbage out | there too. | | [1] https://www.ncregister.com/blog/christ-s-power-shines- | even-i... | monero-xmr wrote: | I wasn't critiquing Catholics. I am Catholic and believe in | demonic possession and ghosts. I was trying to make HN | aware of this Catholic trivia. | antognini wrote: | True, but Catholicism isn't a democracy. Catholic beliefs | aren't determined by what self-professed Catholics say they | believe in, but what the Catholic Church itself professes. | olddustytrail wrote: | Self-professed Catholics are the Catholic church. That's | what's meant by the phrase, not the bishops. | rsynnott wrote: | I mean, that's one way to look at it. But in practice | Catholics aren't, and never have been, a monolith, belief- | wise, unless you define it so narrowly that the only | Catholics are, well, maybe some of the cardinals. | | (Or not even those, if you take the view of some post- | Vatican-II breakaway sects who consider the Pope to be | illegitimate) | antognini wrote: | That's true, there is a great deal of theological | diversity within the Catholic Church, and to an extent | that diversity is actually encouraged. But the Church | also sets bounds on what beliefs can acceptably be called | "Catholic" and those bounds are Catholic dogma. (And over | the centuries theologians have actually constructed quite | a baroque hierarchy of degrees of theological certainty | attached to various beliefs. [1]) | | The actual dogmas are fairly narrow. They include things | like the doctrine of transubstantiation, Jesus being both | God and man, Mary being conceived without original sin. | But a lot of other things aren't dogmatic. For example, | it's perfectly acceptable to argue that Roman Catholic | priests should be permitted to be married or that Limbo | doesn't exist. | | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theological_notes | tablespoon wrote: | > Catholics also believe in demonic possession, hell, and | exorcism. Not the first things a priest will tell you though :) | | Because the first thing anyone will tell you is almost always a | greeting, their name, or "excuse me." | gpderetta wrote: | There is also the classic "what are you doing in my home!" | bombcar wrote: | I mean "The hell you devil doing in my home!" would satisfy | both. | Grazester wrote: | Why wouldn't they tell you they believe in hell? It is | mentioned in pray it was used to scare me into not misbehaving | as a child by my teachers who were priests and nuns. This is | not a secret nor did they try to hide it. | gjsman-1000 wrote: | > by my teachers who were priests and nuns | | The Catholic Church has always believed in Hell. Jesus | himself made reference to Gehenna (which was literally a | valley of death back when he was alive, the _Valley of | Hinnom_ , where the Bible also documents child sacrifice to | have occurred), as well as symbolically with the parable of | the wedding feast. For this reason, many Catholic saints were | themselves quite afraid of it and worked to avoid it. | | Common misunderstanding though comes from "how could a good | God sentence anyone to hell?" Well, to put it one way, he | doesn't. Imagine if your teenage son violently doesn't want | to attend your Christmas gathering. Would it be loving of you | to force him to attend? Or, more graphically, imagine your | son is a drug user who has lost home, family, girlfriend, and | yet obstinately resists rehab - and you'd love for him to | come, but he'd have to lay off the drugs, and he refuses any | effort. Thus, the Catholic understanding is that the souls in | Hell are obstinate in their sin and obstinately do not want | to be in Heaven, for eternity because they will never change | their minds. "The doors of hell are locked on the inside." | They will, within Catholic thought, _know_ they are in the | wrong, but they would sin immediately again if they were | permitted another second on Earth. This obstinacy in sin is | mainly caused by refusal to repent for grave sins that have | been committed. | | This also explains, in a way, the reason why the Catholic | Church _in particular_ has very little hope in salvation for | those who are atheist or similar. | whatshisface wrote: | > _the Catholic understanding is that the souls in Hell are | obstinate in their sin and obstinately do not want to be in | Heaven_ | | It sure is easy to answer questions when you can just make | things up... "Oh, they're just expressing their | preferences." | monero-xmr wrote: | The demonic possession and exorcism parts not hell itself | krapp wrote: | Everyone knows Catholics believe in that stuff, it's why | they show up so often in horror movies. | dragonwriter wrote: | > Catholics also believe in demonic possession, hell, and | exorcism. Not the first things a priest will tell you though. | | It pretty literally is one of the first things a priest (or a | layperson acting on their behalf) will tell you, in that it is | a routine part of preparation for the entry into the Church, | and, in fact, a (minor) exorcism is performed as part of | baptism. | antognini wrote: | Moreover every Catholic diocese must have a trained exorcist. | Ekaros wrote: | Would that make Lenin a saint? I mean his body has been around | wearing away clothes for good while. | jayknight wrote: | They have put a lot of effort into keeping him looking | incorrupt (he's mostly wax now) to try to elevate him to the | status of an atheist/communist "saint", basically mocking the | traditional Orthodox views on incorrupt relics of saints. | potatototoo99 wrote: | Another church decorated with skeletons: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capela_dos_Ossos | belter wrote: | Been there great place. It's also my desktop wallpaper...never | again got interrupted by colleagues and junior developers | during my coding sessions. | fishtacos wrote: | I find it uncomfortable. Not because it's a reminder of our own | mortality, which is clearly the case and the reason why it was | created - to help us deal with it subconsciously. | | I find it uncomfortable because the point is to not just embrace | death, but look forward to a better life afterwards. A death cult | exposition. | tablespoon wrote: | > I find it uncomfortable because the point is to not just | embrace death, but look forward to a better life afterwards. A | death cult exposition. | | Does a child looking forward to adulthood make you | uncomfortable, too? | fishtacos wrote: | >>Does a child looking forward to adulthood make you | uncomfortable, too? | | Adulthood is a known and documented expectation of childhood. | | Life after death is not. Not sure what analogy you think | you're making here. | tablespoon wrote: | > Adulthood is a known and documented expectation of | childhood. | | > Life after death is not. Not sure what analogy you think | you're making here. | | Not from the perspective of the people who made this | church. | | Sci-fi fantasies aside, physical death is a transition | everyone's going to make. What's so discomforting about | embracing that? It's not like they were committing suicide | to get to the afterlife faster. | | > To add to your unmentioned editing, since you rewrote it | completely: | | No, I just made the transition a little more specific, less | than a minute after I posted. In any case, I changed it | back. | fishtacos wrote: | >> Not from the perspective of the people who made this | church. | | Clearly. That is the position I'm opposing. No evidence = | just that. | | >>What's so discomforting about embracing that? | | Embracing death is discomforting for most people, | including myself and everyone I know. You might be an | outlier, but it is plenty clear that religion is created | as a method of assuaging that fear via fantastical | notions. | | >>It's not like they were committing suicide to bring it | on faster. | | It is detrimental in human civilization development. If | you haven't figured this out yet, you might live in a | cave near Al Qaeda. | fishtacos wrote: | To add to your unmentioned editing, since you rewrote it | completely: | | >>Does a student looking forward to graduation and their life | afterward make you uncomfortable, too? | | Same answer as below. | pfortuny wrote: | No: Cristianism, in that sense, only tells you that _this | life is not all_. Not simply that "there is a better one". | | As a matter of fact, redeeming the time means precisely | making the most of it. | sbaiddn wrote: | That's because you (presumably not a Catholic or, like most, a | poorly catechized one) are projecting your values and view | points onto a faith you don't understand. | | Classic cultural colonialism if you ask me. | | There's literally two millennia (well 5 if you include the Old | Testament and commentary) literature on the Church's position | on matter, the body, corpses, life, death, afterlife, etc. | necessary to understand this. | | Have you read a significant amount (any!) of this to reach your | conclusion? | fishtacos wrote: | >>That's because you (presumably not a Catholic or, like | most, a poorly catechized one) are projecting your values and | view points onto a faith you don't understand. | | I'm atheist. Was born one, will die one, so you are correct. | | >>Classic cultural colonialism if you ask me. | | What makes you draw that conclusion? I'm an immigrant, have | been exposed to everything from Islam to Catholicism to | Southern Baptist, Hinduism, Buddhism, various other sects. | I'd rather look inward, if I were, you, as colonialism in the | name of Catholicism is why so many native cultures and | religions have been erased from history and existence. | | >>There's literally two millennia (well 5 if you include the | Old Testament and commentary) literature on the Church's | position on matter, the body, corpses, life, death, | afterlife, etc. necessary to understand this. | | And it remains a death cult at its core, despite sparkling it | up with positions of corpses... | | >>Have you read a significant amount (any!) of this to reach | your conclusion? | | I've read enough to know it's all BS. My close friend and | cousin, someone who is a brother to me, spent years at the | Vatican's liturgical schools. A+++ student. They wanted to | make him a priest and he politely declined. He is an atheist | thanks to that education. | | Thanks but no thanks. | sbaiddn wrote: | "I'm atheist. Was born one, will die one, so you are | correct" | | Cool. You do you! | | "What makes you draw that conclusion?" | | You're foreign (both by incident of birth, or effort of | study) of to the matter at hand but bless us with your | opinion. | | "I'm an immigrant, have been exposed to everything from | Islam to Catholicism to Southern Baptist, Hinduism, | Buddhism, various other sects | | Good for you? So's half the people on this forum including | yours truly. | | "I'd rather look inward, if I were, you, as colonialism in | the name of Catholicism is why so many native cultures and | religions have been erased from history and existence" | | Who says that Im Catholic? Or that I haven't? That being | said, I see a lot more brown faces crossing Rio Grande into | Mexico where Catholic Spain ruled than North of it. | | "And it remains a death cult at its core, despite sparkling | it up with positions of corpses..." | | Sure. | | "I've read enough to know it's all BS." | | Pray, what? | | "My close friend and cousin, someone who [...] He is an | atheist thanks to that education." | | And we've come full circle: good for him! He does he, you | do you and the monks do the monks. | | As to myself I'll do me and pour myself some Chartreuse. | I'll raise a glass and offer a blessing to you, my | wonderful internet interlocutor! | gigibec wrote: | [dead] | DubiousPusher wrote: | I would encourage everyone to visit here or one of the similar | places mentioned in this thread. | | I visited the Sedlec Ossuary a couple of years ago and it was the | most visceral personal emotional reaction I have ever had to | seeing something. There is something mind-shifting about seeing | thousands of human skulls in a pile ala Terminator that I cannot | describe with words. I can only relate it to visiting the Vietnam | War Memorial and realizing how those overwhelming 60,000ish names | are a mere footnote in the casualty record of human conflict. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedlec_Ossuary | sitkack wrote: | The Sedlec Ossuary is, or probably should be a great VR | experience if you can't go in person (I have). The shock wears | off and then you realize how human the place is. We whisk our | dead out of sight, having the bones of your dead relatives be | so visible, would be like having a time compass directing the | path of the rest of your life. | Aeolun wrote: | It'd be kind of weird to bring someone there, count down the | eleventh skull from the top right and then say "this here is | grandpa". | snshn wrote: | "It's too late to be scared, the skeleton is already inside you" | mensetmanusman wrote: | Memento mori (Latin for 'remember that you [have to] die') is an | artistic reminder of the inevitability of death. Helps me | tremendously! | jxramos wrote: | exactly, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memento_mori | Ichthypresbyter wrote: | One of the more famous examples of this is the strange object | in the foreground of _The Ambassadors_ by Hans Holbein the | Younger [0], which resolves as a skull when viewed from the | correct angle. | | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Hans_Hol... | peoplefromibiza wrote: | Yep, great place, been there sooo many times, it used to be free, | now there's a small fee to pay at the entrance which also | includes a visit to the museum of the Capuchins. You'll find | there the _San Francesco in Meditazione_ ( _San Francis in | Prayer_ ) painting from Caravaggio. [1] | | The English Wikipedia reports it as a copy, but it is still | debated if the original is the one in _Santa Maria della | Concezione dei Cappuccini_ (Our Lady of the Conception of the | Capuchins) or the other one in _Palazzo Barberini_. | | Fun fact: both paintings are in Piazza Barberini, a few hundred | meters from each other. | | [1] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Francis_in_Prayer_(Carav... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-02-10 23:00 UTC)