[HN Gopher] Mercedes-Benz previews its operating system MB.OS ___________________________________________________________________ Mercedes-Benz previews its operating system MB.OS Author : mfiguiere Score : 45 points Date : 2023-02-22 20:42 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (media.mbusa.com) (TXT) w3m dump (media.mbusa.com) | kensai wrote: | Software is what legacy car manufacturers have been lacking so | it's a move to the right direction indeed. Curious also about the | future OSes of BMW and VW Group. | k8sToGo wrote: | VW tried to do their own software with the ID series and failed | horribly to the point the CEO had to be replaced. | rad_gruchalski wrote: | I take any "legacy manufacturer" vehicle over the "modern | manufacturer" car. If my only choice is VAG, I take Skoda. | TheLoafOfBread wrote: | Car is an appliance, like a fridge. I don't want to have an | internet connected display showing me ads and "upgrades" on a | fridge, nor a car, nor a TV. | nameisu wrote: | [dead] | whiplash451 wrote: | Lots of negative comments in this thread, which I can understand. | | But let's be fair, for a car manufacturer, carplay is the kiss of | death. | chrstphrknwtn wrote: | How so? I mean, they're still manufacturing the actual car | itself. | megatoaster wrote: | "In China, Mercedes-Benz is engaging in a local cloud partnership | with Tencent to support its automated driving systems. An | enriched UI for automated driving functions including an advanced | lane-level map view is planned." | | Tencent, really? How did that come about? | antipaul wrote: | These people should be banned from making software. Some imposed | penance would be good too. | | "MBUX" is buggy and confusing as heck in a brand new 2023 model. | | Apparently one of the most requested features in new cars [1] has | been CarPlay - people are tired of the native "infotainment" | garbage | | [1] It's also a top feature for many drivers and car buyers. | Twenty-three percent of new car buyers in the U.S. say they "must | have" CarPlay https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/05/29/apple-carplay- | massive-su... | badRNG wrote: | > The company is confident that this strategic approach to | software and hardware development will be the basis for lifetime | revenues as well as additional contributions. Already in 2022, | Mercedes-Benz generated more than 1 billion euro in software- | enabled revenues with products and services such as navigation, | Live Traffic or online map updates. | | Get ready to pay a monthly subscription to use features that come | stock on your car. | drewg123 wrote: | What's the legality of hacking these things, assuming you own | the car? | | For example, BMW charges $18/mo to turn on heated seats you | already own. Am I legally allowed to hack their software to | enable heated seats w/o paying? How about installing a wire and | switch and running them manually? | TheLoafOfBread wrote: | Of course you are, otherwise jailbreaking would be a crime. | gigatexal wrote: | All it needs to do is support CarPlay. Honestly car | manufacturers should just let Apple do the whole car takeover. | I've not met a stock system I liked. I'd rather it be powered | by my phone. | sokoloff wrote: | I added a $200 CarPlay radio to our old Honda and it blows | away every factory nav unit for usability (and sounds | _adequate_ ). At this point, I'm only buying a car that has, | or can easily have added, wireless CarPlay. | speedgoose wrote: | I like the BMW and the Tesla ones. I also heard good things | about the Polestar Android. | | The current OS on the Mercedes looks very laggy and not very | user friendly, but if they fixed these major issues it could | be quite nice. The high end Mercedes has a huge oled | dashboard, it's not something Apple CarPlay supports. | rootusrootus wrote: | Tesla's is fairly good, but the way they handle text | messages leaves me really wishing I could just have | CarPlay. I may install a third-party screen somewhere so I | can have it back. | udev wrote: | MB.OS stands for Monetization Backdoor Operating System. | dsr_ wrote: | A friend just bought a Mustang and showed it off. | | The driver's dashboard is a somewhat configurable screen. All I | could think of was that a 1970 Mustang, treated moderately well | and maintained regularly, is still a useful car fifty years | later. In fact, if it's survived, the asking price is within | spitting distance of a new Mustang. | | Is there any chance that a 2023 Mustang will be a useful vehicle | in 2073? | | Will any 2026 Mercedes still be running and maintainable in 2076? | moremetadata wrote: | I'll give Google their due, their satnav maps apps was accurate | enough and fast enough to not need a co driver on unfamiliar | roads with my Colin McRae head on. Thats more than can be said | with MB's Becker Maps. | svdr wrote: | The use of touchscreens has made handling devices and machines a | lot less pleasant. We will soon see a reverse movement, where | physical buttons become more important again. So much more | satisfying. | | Of course, this can still be combined with plenty of software. | ryanianian wrote: | I'm surprised the StreamDeck family of gizmos hasn't caught on | as a popular aftermarket car mod. It's just little LEDs inside | clear buttons. I'd love about 5 of them right on the center | console that I could somehow program to do routines for me. | mempko wrote: | Is this using Jolla's Android AppSupport? https://jolla.com/ | | I use a Sailfish OS phone and it works amazingly well. I know | they have been pushing hard into the auto industry after pulling | out of Russia because of the war. I would be very pleased if | Mercedes is helping fund Jolla. | mpol wrote: | In the past few years Jolla worked together with MB. In the | latest Sailfish release there were a lot of Android updates, | and it seems of high importance to Jolla. At the same time, | Jolla could use a new investor, but there was no news that MB | would be interested in becoming an investor in Jolla. | tpmx wrote: | Ah, this will be fun to watch. I give this about a 3% chance of | producing something the end users will actually enjoy using. | | Hardware manufacturers are generally extremely bad at building | software teams. It's against their DNA. Their executive | leadership culture tends to actively reject people who are good | at leading software teams, nevermind how much they want that | sweet UI/software. (Yes, Apple exists and they are a hardware | company that's pretty good at software.) | | Then add a German extremely hierarchical largeco culture to the | mix... | qrohlf wrote: | I was recently an owner of a Merced-Benz commercial van, and the | software was by far the worst part of that whole experience. | | It had obvious race-condition type bugs when it came to the user | interface layer, but most frustrating was its tendency to succumb | to some kind of memory leak on long drives where the entire head | unit would just lock up and crash to a black screen after 6-7 | hours of being turned on. Because the vehicle kept the computer | system "warm" for up to 30 minutes or so to avoid doing a full | (and slow) bootup process every time you stopped for fuel, this | was a real problem on long trips and couldn't always be solved by | power cycling the vehicle. | | Had a dealer try to update it twice, which didn't seem to | meaningfully impact the system stability at all. | | Then there were multiple other, non-head-unit related glitches | like the lane assist and cruise control features being | incompatible with the state of Nevada (if the system fails to | detect any other vehicles for a period of more than about 90 | minutes, it assumes that there is a sensor fault, and refuses to | operate [1]. Unfortunately it is _quite easy_ to spend hours on | the road alone in many southwestern US states, triggering this | failsafe mode) | | Suffice it to say that I am very skeptical of any software coming | from Mercedes these days. | | [1] https://www.winnieowners.com/forums/f265/2019-sprinter- | cruis... | GoToRO wrote: | That sw does not come from Mercedes, they just buy different | devices for what they need from suppliers. The salary offered | by one such supplier for a graduate engineer was less than what | a construction company was offering to hang dry wall (qualified | worker). The construction company was raising a new building | for the supplier. | TheSpiceIsLife wrote: | That's mostly an irrelevant detail. | | Mercedes may not be the OEM in this instance, though they are | certainly the vendor, who put their name and reputation to | it. | coffeebeqn wrote: | I'm also horrified by the trend to put more and more of the | meters into the UI. My Ford has done the booting thing before | on a highway as well as once it flipped the screen horizontally | until it was shut down and started again. I can't imagine the | quality is any better for the display components that will | replace speedometers and such | babypuncher wrote: | I don't think I've ever used software provided by an automaker | that I would classify as "good". Just varying degrees from | "functional, but barebones and clunky" down to "so buggy and | useless it's a legitimate safety hazard". | | As a result, I'm firmly on team "make every infotainment system | a dumb terminal for your phone" and refuse to buy any car that | doesn't support both Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. | killerpopiller wrote: | I own a MB V-class and had no software issue I remember. | ASalazarMX wrote: | > couldn't always be solved by power cycling the vehicle. | | Made me remember when I turned on my new (dumb) TV and it did a | startup sound. I knew it would get worse in the future. | lh7777 wrote: | > if the system fails to detect any other vehicles for a period | of more than about 90 minutes, it assumes that there is a | sensor fault, and refuses to operate | | I have a current model Sprinter and this behavior is | frustrating (thanks for the explanation, by the way, I thought | it was a random bug). Cruise will also disengage in heavy rain | or snow, with the system saying the sensor is dirty. It | wouldn't be so bad if traditional cruise control would keep | working without the active braking assist, etc. but | unfortunately it's all or nothing. I do like the system when it | works, which is most of the time, and it's never done something | that felt unsafe. | | I haven't had any problems with the info system. This is my | first vehicle with a touchscreen, and I was worried that it'd | be a pain to use. But Mercedes provides real buttons for common | actions, little trackpads on the steering wheel that can | control the system without ever having to touch the screen, Car | Play works great, and the built-in nav system is useful for | those times I need directions and don't have a cell signal. | | My biggest worry is how these delicate parts will hold up over | the years. My 10 year old car has a monochrome dot matrix | display that loses a good number of pixels when it gets hot | out. Will I really be able to get replacement parts for the | Sprinter when the screen or computer start to die in 10-15 | years? | mtillman wrote: | This is why I only buy used MBs from pre-2016. They're | fantastic and they don't require a subscription. Though the | 2016 E/S is a wifi hotspot if you really want that in a car. | [deleted] | ElijahLynn wrote: | Yuck: | | > MB.OS is designed and developed in-house to retain full control | | You better have some world class software engineers to pull this | off, a LOT of them. And retain them. If not, you better go open | source. You can still retain full control with open source. | | Good software is the KEY to good cars, especially electric ones. | Why are we inventing 100 different models of cars every year? | What a waste of human potential. | oneplane wrote: | Ecosystems are the key, not so much in which house or how | public it is built. (see: iOS) It's also a system for a car, | and probably a niche one at that. | | There are a few things that are relevant in Car-OS these days: | - Ecosystems - Long-term maintenance - Integration | with a phone that takes over most day-to-day interactions | - Car should work without it | | If MB.OS and BMW's version and Audi and whoever else wants to | build one doesn't support CarPlay or Android Auto (or whatever | their future incarnations will be), it is already irrelevant. | If anything, MB.OS is about as relevant to a consumer as QNX | is. Or VxWorks for that matter. (spoiler: consumer doesn't care | and doesn't really want anything to do with it) | | That doesn't mean that all car makers should just keep using an | ancient QNX version statically forever, or whatever some OEM | happens to install with the head units, but an in-house Linux | distro with some vendor branding sauce really is about as | relevant as blinker fluid. | TheRealPomax wrote: | This makes an odd assumption about what drives, and does not | drive, sales. Companies don't buy 300 company car because it | has the best center console OS. | oneplane wrote: | No, it doesn't. What I wrote is the exact same thing you | condensed here: | | > Companies don't buy 300 company car because it has the | best center console OS. | | However, I centred mine more around personal consumers, | rather can organisational buyers. It's also not just some | console OS, but an ecosystem that also reals with sensors | and self-driving features. | | I also went more into the technical aspects of operating | system success, but rather than say something to the extent | of "yet another QNX-style lineage is about as useful as | Windows Mobile", I wrote a slightly more expanded story, | just like Mercedes-Benz did on their announcement (but they | added a whole lot of extra fluff about how their OS is a | value add). | mackman wrote: | I'd be surprised if this isn't just another Android fork. | mempko wrote: | It's not from what I read. MBUX, the UI is built using Qt. | [deleted] | delecti wrote: | I work there, and I'd be massively surprised if it _were_. | | Historically, their in-vehicle software has been handled by | other companies they've contracted, and is radically | different from generation to generation (different company | each time). | HellDunkel wrote: | The name MB.OS is misleading. It is not a new operating system | but a linux or android based hmi sytem. | whalesalad wrote: | I disagree. Sometimes you need to invent things yourself. | Mercedes is an absolutely massive company with many subsidiary | brands. This is not an automatic bad move. | ElijahLynn wrote: | But they are not a software company at the core. They need to | be to pull this off. | orbifold wrote: | Both Mercedes and Volkswagen have absolutely massive | software divisions, easily 10k+ people. They pay really | well for German standards and have access to a large talent | pool of people that would like to live in Germany. | rad_gruchalski wrote: | Big and well paid doesn't equal quality. The fiasco of | id3 is the best example. Or the whole Audi/VW drama. It | doesn't change the fact that their management just | doesn't get software. Pouring more money over that and | hiring more "talent" isn't going to change that. | ryandrake wrote: | Most hardware companies are not known for good software. | They treat software like it's just another line item on | the BOM: Like a bolt or a screw. Procure it as cheaply as | possible, scoop it into the product on the assembly line, | and make sure it passes a few checkboxes and you're done. | Unless they see software as a core differentiating | product feature that drives purchases, their quality bar | is going to be "barely good enough to not cause a product | recall". | cududa wrote: | I mean their self driving tech seems to be the most | impressive out there | qotgalaxy wrote: | [dead] | catchnear4321 wrote: | > Unlocking financial opportunity | | bazinga | guluarte wrote: | >Offering flexible upgrades | | do you want to buy the headlights DLC ($0.9 first month, then | $29.9)? Y/n | TheLoafOfBread wrote: | I can't wait when infotainment will start playing ads. | rolenthedeep wrote: | Please press the brake or accelerator to confirm your | subscription | rad_gruchalski wrote: | Or just wait until ADAS front assist gets a false positive | around a t junction and someone stops in your rear. | juice_bus wrote: | Sorry, your package only allows you to turn the volume up to | 45%, would you like to upgrade? | Hamuko wrote: | I'd personally love if manufacturers actually offered upgrades | on their older cars. I had an older Mercedes-Benz and I | would've absolutely given Mercedes-Benz money if they had a | first-party CarPlay solution for my then car. | cjdoc29 wrote: | Fun fact: Porsche offers this for some of its older | generation models. | | https://newsroom.porsche.com/en_US/2023/products/porsche- | cla... | Hamuko wrote: | Yeah, Porsche is the only manufacturer that I know of that | actually cares about older cars they've sold. | | They even made an amusing ad to that effect: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8-9oIq1hxw | unglaublich wrote: | You're effectively saying that you want more disabled | features, just in case you want to upgrade your property at | some point. | babypuncher wrote: | No, they're saying they would pay for new software. Many | ~10 year old cars have all the hardware necessary to | support things like CarPlay, but because CarPlay didn't | exist yet they do not have it. A lot of people would | probably happily pay $200 to add it to their car without | having to shoehorn in a third party head unit. | abfan1127 wrote: | I think it was more about offering features on cars | manufactured prior the new feature was released... | ryanianian wrote: | Not really. CarPlay didn't exist when the car was made. The | car manufacturer had to add software integration even if | the hardware was already competent. Parent comment is | saying they'd pay to receive this added integration. | haliskerbas wrote: | The best car OS so far (even better than Tesla IMO) has been | Apple CarPlay. Just be dumb and let my phone handle it, and make | the touch screen decent. Bonus points if you implement the multi | screen CarPlay concept! Just give up! | rad_gruchalski wrote: | Really dislike that idea. Forces all the ios stuff on the | dashboard, usually in low quality and limited controls. | | BMW CarDrive starts getting bad but it's still pretty decent | good quality, fast os. What irks me about it is that the BMW | people start dumbing down the ICE UI to match the simplicity of | the EV, which takes away a lot of of good stuff. | | Best visible when comparing the 2019 vs 2022 model UI. 2019 was | by far the best. | dontlaugh wrote: | Agreed, except the last bit. My phone should have nothing to do | with the UI showing speed or RPM. | haliskerbas wrote: | I can get behind this. I'm okay with a simple car display for | the vehicles vitals. | babypuncher wrote: | Yes! Every car infotainment system should only cover the basics | (bluetooth, radio, critical car controls). Then act as a dumb | terminal for CarPlay and Android Auto. | | Cars are trying too hard to do things our smartphones already | do way better. | antipaul wrote: | This is the saving grace. | | And luckily, the next generation CarPlay will span the entire | dashboard, including in front of the driver [1] | | I can't wait to abandon my native "infotainment" cluster** | | [1] https://www.macrumors.com/2022/12/28/next-generation- | carplay... | Philip-J-Fry wrote: | This is why I can't wait until the next generation CarPlay is | released. When your phone is rendering the infotainment and the | driver display it's going to be game changing based on the | examples Apple showed. | | Android Auto/CarPlay changed car infotainment forever, and the | next logical step is to just take over the whole thing. | s1mon wrote: | This is the same reason I do not want a smart TV. I have one (a | Sony), but thankfully it must have lost contact with our WiFi | network at some point and I never notice that it does anything | other than act as a monitor for our Apple TV. It used to be | that it would periodically bug me about software updates and I | would endure its dreadful UI just long enough to get through | that. | kevinventullo wrote: | Right. I don't trust Mercedes to build an OS any more than I | trust Apple to build a car. They should focus on their | strengths. | shdshdshd wrote: | The MBUX is awful. Unresponsive, lagging, buggy, unstable, | anything that could go wrong is going wrong. Looking forward for | fixes or more interest towards the user. | maldev wrote: | Everyones talking about alot of negatives. But I have a E53 AMG | 4matic+ coup. It looks amazing, like constant compliments, i've | even had people compliment it and give me their number in a | wendy's drive through. | | But the OS(MBUX 2) is actually really good, at first I was a bit | negative on it. But the way they have everything integrated that | isn't really possible with apple play is nice. The dash is | customizable, I have my setup with speed, an array right in the | center on when to turn, and the right is a mini map so I can see | the road. On top of that the screen in the center is amazing and | has a few views. | | The voice assistant is really nice, does everything I want, they | have it baked in so each seat can activate it and it knows based | off a mic. Can't do that with apple play. So when a girl in my | car says "Turn on the massage" or "Turn the temperature to 70", | it only does for their side. And honestly, besides the map not | having police checkpoints, it's a bit better than apple maps or | google maps. And on top of that, I can lookup the location on | apple maps on my phone, then send it to the car. | | And according to my dealer, most people forgo using carplay for | anything other than music in alot of the benzes. | oellegaard wrote: | I have an EQB and I totally agree. I insisted on getting | CarPlay but I used it once and I don't see any need for it. | Much happier with MBUX. However, this new Android based OS | isn't good news and I'm not sure I would want to get a new car | with an Android based OS in it. | mempko wrote: | It's likely using Jolla's AppSupport (no official | announcements, just my guess). It's not Android Based but an | Android compatibility layer. | | Kind of how WINE lets you run Windows apps in Linux. I have a | Sailfish OS, and it's a linux system (full command line, UI | built with QT) but also has Android support via their | translation layer. | magnuspaaske wrote: | I rented an Audi and this was my experience too. It ended up | working out really well to use the car navigation system and I | still had car play right there for carplay and phone calls. And | for navigation stuff you can still load up google or apple maps | if you need to double check the route since they sometimes have | different traffic information. But most of the time you don't | need to | netfortius wrote: | "Building a proprietary system:..." | | This will pretty much reassure everyone willing to drive under | the control of such. | jagged-chisel wrote: | Why does the automobile industry insist on keeping these things | in-house when they are clearly terrible at them? I recall an | interview with a Ford manager a few years back where they were | asked something about adopting Car Play and the response was | something like "we have people that can write software for us, so | we won't be using that." | akira2501 wrote: | > The company is confident that this strategic approach to | software and hardware development will be the basis for | lifetime revenues as well as additional contributions. | | I think they're pretty blunt as to "why." What they seem to be | hazy on is the "how." | gangstead wrote: | It seems like they go through phases of we-can-do-this-in-house | followed by let's-just-buy-something-that-works. MB seems to be | in the in-house part of the cycle. | Bud wrote: | [dead] | stevenally wrote: | Ok... What car brand has the least bad UI these days? | | I have been putting off getting a new car for about a year. | ryanianian wrote: | I have a recent Mazda. | | It boots to CarPlay pretty quickly. Its native controls are | pretty utilitarian when they are needed (e.g. to switch to | native SiriusXM when cell signal is spotty). I even prefer the | look of its maps although I don't use them. | | And, get a load of this: they still have actual and intuitive | physical buttons for climate controls, defrosters, and driving | modes. | | Oh, and the car itself is decent as well if you forgive the meh | fuel-economy. | zztop44 wrote: | Mazda. They're all in on being anti-touchscreen plus they | support CarPlay (with a physical control). | zie wrote: | One with Apple CarPlay and/or Android Auto built-in, so you can | avoid the car UI as much as possible. | lallysingh wrote: | I put a quad-lock on my dashboard and just stick my phone on | it. It's right next to my steering wheel. I set the stereo to | bluetooth link and everything's actually great. | | I think CarPlay and Auto are too much. Outside of navigation | and music, what overlap do we have in a car and phone? Just | enable bluetooth sending of locations or full-on directions. | Bluetooth music already works great. | | Eventually we'll have voice agent integration so that stuff | nearby (e.g., bluetooth range) gets integrated into the | available status/command set of one primary one. | | Leave all the fast-moving, upgradable stuff on the phone. | Make the car platform stable and you've got the best of both | worlds. | zie wrote: | Totally valid. What's a quad-lock? is that some sort of | phone mount? | thomasjb wrote: | Probably an Ibex [1] as they're based on the post-2007 | Landrover Defender dashboard | | [1] https://www.ibexvehicles.com | TheLoafOfBread wrote: | Oh yes, that's what I want - permanently online, bug ridden OS | playing me ads and forcing me to buy software "upgrades" of stuff | already installed in my car. | | What a Brave New World. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-02-22 23:00 UTC)