[HN Gopher] AI's Instagram Problem ___________________________________________________________________ AI's Instagram Problem Author : deepwaters Score : 47 points Date : 2023-02-23 20:38 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.deeplearning.ai) (TXT) w3m dump (www.deeplearning.ai) | minimaxir wrote: | All AI projects are valuable, but it's annoying and demotivating | to work hard on a unique and useful project and have no one | read/use it because it doesn't stand out in the extremely | rapidly-evolving ecosystem. | | Most of my AI text-generation and image-generation projects and | tools have already become obsolete by technology released in the | past few months, and I've almost given up competing. | gnramires wrote: | One advise I'll never forget (from an interview with late | mathematician Maryam Mirzakhani) is that you don't have to race | faster than everyone else (although if you can, that's great!). | You can just run in a direction no one is running toward (and | hopefully be persistent). Then you're only racing yourself and | speed is largely irrelevant. | | I myself know I'm very slow, specially developing projects. So | I don't try to race anyone, except contribute to things I know | are neglected. There are so many neglected problems, you don't | need to work on the most coveted fields. | satvikpendem wrote: | Problem is that's not how academic funding works. Grants are | generally not given to possible dead ends. | nl wrote: | Don't be discouraged. Your work is good. | | And remember we are 6-12 months off having good, open source | chatGPT class open source models and the software support to | make it possible to run them at home. | eternalban wrote: | Ironic mantra for you: Geoffrey Hinton in 70s, Minsky, Symbolic | Logic, Neural Nets, stay the course. | knicholes wrote: | When asked how to keep up with all of this AI/ML stuff when | starting your own AI business, Jeremy Howard (general genius | and co-creator of fast.ai) replied that you don't need to know | everything and keep up with everything. Pick a niche and focus | just on that. And if that keeps changing too fast or is too | much, pick a niche inside that niche. | Xeoncross wrote: | Stuff does happen though. | | - Facebook enters the geolocation game | (dowalla/foursquare/instagram) | | - Google releases reviews to maps (yelp & co) | | - Amazon starts it's own airline (Fedex) | | - Microsoft adds ChatGPT to search (Kagi, Duckduckgo, etc..) | | Sometimes it's hard to recover your startup when a big player | does something to fill the void you were targeting. | aziaziazi wrote: | How does DDG and Kagi competes with ChatGpt ? In my | understanding their "responses" above search results works like | Google graph, but I'll be happy to be corrected. | Xeoncross wrote: | Most people don't use search engines to search, they use them | to answer. | | That's why Google, DDG, Kagi and others are all putting | summary blurbs. | | Now that we have ChatGPT a lot of people are going to cut out | searches in exchange for prompts. | baxtr wrote: | _> AI develops so quickly that waves of new ideas keep coming: | quantum AI, self-supervised learning, transformers, diffusion | models, large language models, and on and on._ | | I wonder what's wrong with us as a species. We love to run into | one direction all together chasing the next big thing just until | the next big trend comes along. | | Quantum AI crypto LLMs for the win! | xg15 wrote: | That's definitely not "us as a species". I would say this is a | specific effect of post-industrial, market-driven economy - and | even there, probably restricted to specific communities such as | entrepreneurs. | | By and large, I believe, people are conservative and would | prefer for things to stay as they were, unless the change | solves a specific problem. | | Sometimes people actively tried to resist "progress" and had to | be forced into their luck by those in power. E.g.: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite#Government_response | pixl97 wrote: | And I would say its even more detailed than that. | | In general your most staunch conservative doesn't mind things | changing if it personally benefits them greatly (especially | if they don't bear most the burden of its effects). | | Your most avid progressive commonly want the things that | bring them comfort to stay the same, even if its potentially | harmful to someone else. | | I believe the issue here is we're playing "everything | everywhere all at once". Everywhere on the globe is pretty | much instantly connected to everything else via digital | communications. There is no more sit by the sidelines zone | that gets to avoid this connectivity. You may not want it, | but you have to stop everyone else from bringing that | connectivity too, and somehow maintain casual connectivity | economically unless you want to play caveman. | phailhaus wrote: | New technology = race to figure out how to make the most money | off of it. Not that complicated, nor does it have anything to | do with "us as a species". | uoaei wrote: | > what's wrong with us as a species | | We ask for faster horses, when automobiles would get us where | we want to go. It is a lack of imagination for what is possible | in the future that keeps us risk-averse and focused instead on | a quest for incremental improvements to the status quo. | | This was the focus of the idealistic vision of the whole | "disruption" meta-meme as it spread through Silicon Valley. | | Not to say that maintenance and refinement aren't important, | but innovation doesn't look like just adding more parameters | and ways to scale massive computations. | | The main concept that AI laypeople (even those who burn OpenAI | credits on a hobbyist basis) are missing to really grasp the | possibilities of these kinds of statistical analysis techniques | is a deep understanding of the notion of _inductive bias_. For | instance, Transformers are so powerful precisely because they | have generalized that idea of inductive bias one level up by | using multi-head attention to project onto many different | linear spaces and attend to them differently in different | contexts, rather than just filtering through effectively one | linear perspective at a time as with your traditional dense | NNs. | | The kinds of innovations we have witnessed most recently are | actually pretty small steps in the space of possible | architectures, not to mention training methods, etc. For | instance, predictive coding approximates gradient descent[1] | which opens up all sorts of new architectures (feedback arch, | modular/federated/local compositions, etc.) that are | intractable with traditional backprop-based techniques unless | you can manage the infrastructure around periodic global | parameter/state syncs. | | [1] https://openreview.net/pdf?id=PdauS7wZBfC | potatolicious wrote: | Are these really separate phenomena though? I'd strongly argue | that between self-supervised learning, transformers, diffusion | models, and LLMs we're looking at phases of the same | phenomenon, each building on top of the knowledge that came | before. | | Like vaccines - inactivated viruses isn't a different "wave" | than mRNA, they are logical successors within the same | intellectual pursuit. | | Or Vulkan vs. OpenGL. They aren't separate "fads" that gained | traction. | | Or ARM vs. x86. They aren't "fads" so much as entirely | reasonable evolutions of technologies based on the evolving | knowledge of the field and its needs. | | Not everything is a popularity contest. | softwaredoug wrote: | There is a pretty big gap between what's talked about at | conference and blogs vs the actual, not very sexy, hard data | science work that goes into doing "machine learning" at scale. | Animats wrote: | _" Maintain your faith and keep going"_. | | Why? You're not going to make money if you're losing in a fast- | moving field. | c9capital wrote: | Instagram AlwayS have a problem.... | keerthiko wrote: | This is so true, but to follow this advice takes a respectable | amount of personal discipline, combined with picking a very | specific niche to focus on. A business with an R&D core such as | AI should only be considering generalizing (if at all) after | developing concrete confidence that you are on, and will stay on | the bleeding edge of your initial niche. It's easy to feel | ashamed when you tell someone you're doing X, and enough lay | (tech) persons ask if it uses the trending research technology, | and you're not. It may also make you think like you _should_ use | that tech, but it 's likely a costly distraction more often than | not. | | Our company [0] developed a cutting edge computer vision system | focused on detecting cardio machine exercise cadence (hyper | specific!) and became the only reliable camera-based solution to | do so. We then tried to generalize to all exercise motion (rep | tracking, a still unsolved problem), achieved mediocre success, | and put the exploration to sleep later because we think waiting | for other technologies to mature would be easier and faster | (better 3D cameras, AI pose models, etc). On the other hand we've | picked other niches that meet our business needs to expand our CV | R&D into, with pretty good success but mostly just for internal | use (video content creation tools). More importantly, we're still | the best camera-based indoor cardio detection tech out there, and | that's a big part of why we're still alive as a bootstrapped | business founded in 2010. | | Quadruple down on your niche first! | | [0] https://www.activetheoryinc.com/ | lakomen wrote: | Idk about AI having an Instagram problem, but I know Instagram | has an AI problem. So many fake accounts with AI as actors and | they send you chat messages trying to pretend to be real people. | They even react to comments and can discern good from bad | comments. | | At first it was interesting. Now it's just annoying. | | Then the Instagram algorithm, if you comment on coffee ads that | you drink tea, you'll get tea ads. It will show you progressively | naked women, cameltoes and similar softcore erotica. Sometimes | even real porn. When you report that porn accounts your report | will not even be reviewed and denied. But God beware you post the | word tits. Instant harassment automoderation. All the women that | follow you instantly message you saying hi, how are you, how old | are you, what is your name, where are you from etc. I think | they're infobots trying to build profiles and sell your data. | | Some play the old " I'm a hot girl but can't post my picture, | please buy me an iTunes gift card ", like I was born yesterday. | And how dumb their game is. They see you commenting on a picture | you liked, take that picture, claim to be that person, only on a | private account, and they picked you, their loyal fan. Many of | them are cheap porn actresses or accounts of people having built | profiles from the pictures those porn actresses post, only | modified by AI. | | I am so tired of that platform. And then they serve you small 1 | minute clips of stand up comedy, cats or dogs, or some stupid 1 | person having a chat with themself. Let's not forget those "how | do I say it at my workplace" "expert" vids. And lots of ads in | between. | | Instagram is so disgusting. | notpachet wrote: | > Instagram is so disgusting. | | Why are you still using it? (Not trying to troll you, I'm | legitimately curious -- it really doesn't sound like it's | offering you anything positive at this point) | mey wrote: | As someone using Instagram but has a Todo list item to close | my FB/Instagram/Meta account, the reason I still use it (and | only Instagram) is to follow artists. A hyper curated list of | individuals that post interesting things that I can check up | on. It's what I lost when I shuttered my Twitter account. I | use it as a glorified RSS feed rather than as a way to | interact socially. | | But yeah, the bad outweighs the good, and other than spending | the time to archive data, I do plan to shut it down. | version_five wrote: | This is correct, but there's also some meta comment to be made | that research has an "instragram problem". What he's talking | about isn't really even AI so much as deep learning: there are | lots of other branches that now get virtually no play relative to | deep learning. And then there are all sorts of adjacent CS, image | processing (when was the last time you saw someone talk about | wavelets), language analysis, and other research avenues, | probably often better suited to many problems, that get buried | under the hype. | | This is why academic research is so important. All the corporate | money is flowing to deep learning, grant agencies should be | sustaining the other more fundamental areas. | psyklic wrote: | Academic research has the same problem. When I studied | neuroscience, flashy fMRI studies received substantially more | funding than fundamental research. Without understanding how | simple neural nets work, it's difficult to construct bottom-up | theories of the brain. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-02-23 23:00 UTC)