[HN Gopher] Nokia launches DIY repairable budget Android phone ___________________________________________________________________ Nokia launches DIY repairable budget Android phone Author : mmastrac Score : 739 points Date : 2023-02-25 17:09 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com) | LinuxBender wrote: | Nice! I've been waiting for something like the FairPhone to show | up in the US. | | A sweet bonus would be if they also provided and fully supported | de-googled image or at least had an option to download the de- | googled image after accepting some disclaimers. Or perhaps even | set up a public community for phone hackers to help them build | said image _i.e. crowdsource the work_. | | An optional large shell for a bigger battery would be a nice | upgrade too. My current phone has a 10,000mAh battery and lasts a | very long time after disabling background networking on most | apps. | t0bia_s wrote: | 10000mAh? Does it fit to your pocket? | | Btw degoogling phone almost double battery life. | LinuxBender wrote: | It fits in a velcro holster, my jacket pocket and in my snow | monosuit. | BLKNSLVR wrote: | > snow monosuit | | Just makes me picture Maggie Simpson | | But to be actually on topic, supporting custom ROMs in | order to extricate android from Google is my top priority | when buying a phone. | | If this phone gets lineageOS support then it may be the | perfect phone. | cwiggs wrote: | What phone do you have that has a battery that big? | LinuxBender wrote: | ulefone Armor. There are a couple other models that have a | 13200mAh battery. | toss1 wrote: | Wow - what a great find! I'll be keeping track of that crew | for my next phone! ('tho they don't seem to currently | support Verizon network) | LinuxBender wrote: | Yeah I had to go with a TMO reseller here and most of the | time I am using calling-over-wifi to make up for TMO's | spotty coverage. | freddref wrote: | That's quite a line-up they have! I have a Elephone S3 pro, | two day battery is really great when traveling, no worries. | I'll strongly consider an Ulephone next.. | mmastrac wrote: | I ran a Samsung S5 (?) like this many, many years ago and it | was pretty cool but holy crap it was a beast. My jeans | pockets started to stretch out from carrying it, and it was | impossible to keep it in a jacket pocket at all. | seltzered_ wrote: | I did similar with a galaxy S4 (third party battery | w/special back case to accommodate the larger size). Worked | nice but eventually the battery bulged. | | The tradeoff with replaceable batteries is if when you swap | the phone loses track of time until finding a cell tower. | Fine if in range but a risk when hiking far away, and might | also propagate the wrong time to your smartwatch. | bombolo wrote: | It should be able to sync its clock slowly from the GPS | signal. But I have no clue if the feature is actually | implemented. | andrepd wrote: | >Or perhaps even set up a public community for phone hackers to | help them build said image i.e. crowdsource the work. | | Like xda? :) | LinuxBender wrote: | I think they would be perfect. I was hoping they had a rom | for my phone but I could only find one supporting a really | old version. If they partnered with Nokia to build supported | images for their phones that would be incredible. | wesapien wrote: | Hopefully, the bootloader is unlocked for third party ROMs like | Lineage and others | digitallyfree wrote: | Honestly it would be a huge selling point for this device if | it had excellent custom ROM support on top of the | repairability. There are phones from 2015 still being | supported today by Lineage. | mmastrac wrote: | I use a FP4 in Canada and it's been amazing. I suffer from a | lack of parts, but I make up with that for excuses to vacation | in Europe. | ryukafalz wrote: | You'll still be waiting, I think. The Verge's coverage says | it's not coming to the US: | https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/25/23611844/hmd-nokia-g22-re... | | (I've similarly been wanting a FairPhone here.) | wardedVibe wrote: | Why do none of the good phone options get sold in the US??!? | E.g. Sony has one of the few modern smartphones in a | reasonable size (xperia 10II (might be the dumbest name | though)), and way too few of the bands work in the American | market. | happymellon wrote: | Didn't the US decide to use different frequencies to | everyone else? | Klonoar wrote: | I feel like I recall reading that getting some | certification here is more annoying than it should be, | which means some devices are just straight up not brought | here - curious if anyone knows if this is true or not. | lallysingh wrote: | Doesn't 5g fix that? Same radios for everyone. | rglullis wrote: | Plenty of models that can work with all frequencies, so I | am not sure if that's enough of a justification. | | Anyway, your point reminds me that the my "dream | smartphone" would be one with no cellular connectivity at | all. I'm still waiting for some company to start | producing a keychain-sized 4G (or 5G) hotspot with an | eSIM, which (I hope) would lead to more people asking for | the return of the iPod Touch _and_ for something | equivalent in the Android /Mobile Linux/Windows world. | crispinb wrote: | > justification | | An odd term in this context. No-one has to 'justify' not | selling their stuff to Americans. | cesarb wrote: | > Anyway, your point reminds me that the my "dream | smartphone" would be one with no cellular connectivity at | all. | | You mean a PDA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_di | gital_assistant)? Modern smartphones are basically a PDA | with cellular connectivity (this is more obvious with | early smartphones like the Treo 650), so if you take out | the cellular connectivity, what you have is once again a | PDA. | dmix wrote: | You can't complain about availability of phones (or any | electronics) while being in the US. Try living anywhere | else like Canada. | idonotknowwhy wrote: | Or Australia. I end up importing phones here and missing | out on some features our shitty telcos don't provide | unless you have a white listed phone | amaranth wrote: | In the US your phone has to be on the whitelist to even | get service these days. They're using VoLTE as an excuse | to lock the networks down again. | ryukafalz wrote: | We have decent variety in the US, but I think it's fair | to want phones for specific purposes that aren't | generally served here. The more repairable phones are | hard to come by, and as someone who likes trying | alternative OSes the phones that seem best served by e.g. | Ubuntu Touch (Volla Phone and Fairphone) aren't | available. | LinuxBender wrote: | Oh, darn. Well then maybe Nokia will read these comments and | hopefully add some of my wish-list before it comes to the US. | PaulKeeble wrote: | 5 years for parts is better than nothing but its still a lot of | e-waste. Ideally given screens and ports and batteries are | something that have been around for decades and will be around | for decades more in similar ways it would be nice to extend this | out longer. With progress on CPUs/GPUs slowing we do need to | start to consider much longer usable life times for computer | products and having obsolence built in at 5 years when a | consumable like the battery fails isn't OK. | | OS updates also very short so this phone is quickly going to end | up on LineageOS. | charcircuit wrote: | >but its still a lot of e-waste | | Phones are a tiny amount of waste. Trying to get a few extra | years out of one is a microoptimization in reducing one's waste | output. | Nextgrid wrote: | I'm not sure if the physical volume of the phone in a | landfill is the only issue to consider. What about all the | energy and resources used to manufacture it? | SilverBirch wrote: | It's kind of sad to see Nokia releasing such niche products. Most | people really don't care about this "DIY" attitude, and those | that do immediately shout "Schematics" or "Bootloader". It's a | bit of a nightmare market to service, and certainly a far cry | from where Nokia used to be (even in the windows days!). This | phone is for people who are mad they can't tune the Carburetors | on their Tesla. | tony-allan wrote: | The future I want is more eco-friendly consumer products! | | They have outsourced all the repair stuff to iFixit... | | https://www.nokia.com/phones/en_int/self-repair | Kasutaja11 wrote: | How about a high end phone now? I want a top tier device with sd | slot and headphone jack and not a pain in the ass glued in | everything | dsr_ wrote: | This "just" needs a better screen and 50% more RAM and it would | be quite competitive with $600 phones. | Hackbraten wrote: | The Librem 5 is still on backorder as of today but is likely to | reach shipping parity later this year. | | Not exactly top-tier hardware-wise. But the Librem is running a | mainline Linux kernel, so it will have a decade or more of | software support and security updates. | fatih-erikli wrote: | I wouldn't. It'll explode in your pocket. | peterlk wrote: | And it comes with a 3mm headphone jack! Hallelujah!! I'm so, so | glad someone is stepping up to fill this niche. My only | complaint, and it's kind if a big one, is that the screen is too | damn big. I'm tired of phone manufacturers forcing me to carry a | television in my pocket. I want something small that I can hold | in one hand without a pop socket. I'll trade performance, camera | quality, basically anything for a phone with a small form factor. | behnamoh wrote: | I had the worst customer support by Nokia. Purchased a Nokia 7 | Plus in another country. The phone had a design issue which | resulted in loose USB C port. Many people reported the same | problem online. When I was back in the US, I tried reaching out | to Nokia support and they literally said their repair center | won't even accept my phone for repair because I had purchased it | in another country! | | Third party repair shops told me it takes $100 to fix the USB C | port, almost 1/3 the phone price. Needless to say I didn't do | that and the phone died shortly after only because it couldn't | get charged anymore. Switched to other brands and will never buy | Nokia again. | tony-allan wrote: | See Nokia info: | | https://www.nokia.com/phones/en_int/nokia-g-22/specs | | https://www.nokia.com/phones/en_int/self-repair | f311a wrote: | > The Nokia G22 will cost from PS149.99 shipping on 8 March with | replacement parts costing PS18.99 for a charging port, PS22.99 | for a battery and PS44.99 for a screen. | | So, after a year of use the cost of replacing a battery and the | screen will be close the market value of a used phone. A lot of | people will go for a new phone. | yazzku wrote: | 22.99 + 44.99 = 67.98 | | 149.99 / 67.98 = 2.206 | | So the new phone costs >2x. | | Also, why do you need to replace the battery after 1 year, let | alone the screen? | f311a wrote: | New phone does not mean the same model. New phone usually has | more features and a newer version of Android. | | That's how consumers usually think about the benefits of a | new phone I guess. Very few people care about sustainability. | yazzku wrote: | Can't argue with "few people care", but I'm just not sure | what "new features" or other nonsense you'd be getting. | | I think much of the new phone-buying, Apple fanboys aside, | is that carriers make it easy to constantly upgrade with | "$0" upgrade plans (where you basically end up paying the | full cost of the phone anyway.) Legislation to ban or shape | this kind of advertising could be beneficial to reduce | e-waste. | aaronchall wrote: | Perhaps close in absolute terms but still less than half the | total price. | | I have never had to replace a screen before, but I have bought | new batteries to replace on my own. An easily replaceable one | would be nice. | interblag wrote: | According to these numbers the combined cost of replacing the | battery and the screen is 22.99 + 44.99 == 67.98, which is less | than half (~45.3%) of the cost of the original new phone. | Comparing that to the market value of a _used_ phone is a bit | unfair, since screens and batteries drive the depreciation of | used phones more than any other components (ignoring EoL | timelines for OS security updates, etc), and in this example | you 're getting new ones. Plus not everyone needs a new screen | and battery every year. | | This definitely isn't going to be for everyone but, for what | they're trying to do, IMO the numbers seem reasonable. | dogma1138 wrote: | Not they haven't this phone isn't anymore repairable than an | iPhone it might be just a bit more serviceable. | | Users can't do board or component level repairs, and Nokia isn't | making schematics, diagnostic software and access to low level | firmware that will be needed to independently repair this phone | available. | | User replaceable battery is nice, however every other component | is reliant on a supply on parts being made available for the long | run which is unlikely to happen since there will never be a | healthy supply chain for niche devices. | | I've serviced multiple iPhones replacing a battery and broken | screens with no equipment other than what came in the kit (and an | hair dryer) and not the Apple one. | | Yes it's a PITA but honestly they open easily with a hair dryer | and a suction cup. | | What is far more important on the "right to repair" front is long | term software support which the lack of bricks far more devices | than any hardware failures, a healthy supply chain and not DRMing | components. | | The former 2 is something that iFixIt always seems to ignore | especially the first one the latter is something I that should be | the focus of RtR legislation together with a guarantee for parts | being made available for a period of X years from when the | devices officially stop being sold just in the same way that car | manufacturers and in the past appliance manufacturers were forced | to. | ali7388 wrote: | Users can order cheap parts from china just fine. | | The problem is with manufacturers. Encrypting parts, so simple | part swap does not work. Or replacement screen for $300... | | Apple is really really bad when it comes to repairability! | zamnos wrote: | "Encrypting" parts also has to do with the black market for | iPhones. If you steal someone's iPhone, they can brick it | remotely, so you can't just resell it as a whole working | device, so you part it out to a shady cell phone repair store | who will reuse the parts and give you like fifty bucks so you | can score your next bag of drugs. By embedding serial numbers | on the parts, Apple stops this and makes the parts unusable, | driving down the value of a stolen iPhone. | dogma1138 wrote: | Users can if there is a supply chain for them. | | Apple isn't that bad, and being able to find parts for 10 | year old devices and actually having nearly a decade of | software support makes up for it. | | Ofc it would be better if they didn't lock down parts further | at least the screen and battery aren't locked down yet. | | I replaced a screen on an iPhone XS not even a month ago with | a PS30 kit from Amazon that came with everything needed | including a new liquid protection seal. | | Apple should definitely get flack what what they do but this | pathetic attempt is just that pathetic this isn't a way | forward in any practical manner. | | If you really think you'll be able to find parts for this | phone in 5 years then well I got a bridge to sell you. And | not for nothing it will turn into a paper weight after the 3 | years of software support period will be over. | gandalfian wrote: | Shame no compass or gyroscope, both of which I value. I hope the | idea catches on though the toolkit looks suspiciously like ever | other mobiles. Lift screen with sucker while prying with pick. | Then unscrew battery and admittedly wrestle with glue... Still a | way from the old fashioned, pop off the plastic back and lift the | battery straight out in 20 seconds. | baybal2 wrote: | [dead] | donutshop wrote: | If GrapheneOS could support this phone that would be a killer | combo. | cristiioan wrote: | I don't think Graphene OS will support anything else than | Pixels and posibily in the future a custom phone made for | Graphene OS[https://www.androidpolice.com/graphene-os-phone/] | CameronNemo wrote: | This depends on the phone having an unlockable/relockable | bootloader. | s5300 wrote: | FWIW: | | Bought Nokia 7.1 after it came out and it was a great phone | | However, because of a chassis design flaw the charge port had | excess leverage applied on it practically no matter what - had to | replace charge port 6 times & battery twice over ~1.5 years. | | Before that I had a Samsung Moto X Pure for idk how many years | (got on release date), which I only had to replace an aged | capacity battery once - no charge port issues to speak of (so it | wasn't me being excessively clumsy with the Nokia) | | Swore off of Nokia after that experience along with a few other | flaws in the phone... and I _really_ wanted to like that phone. | | Currently using 13 Pro Max as first Apple device & have been | loving it. | | Hopefully Nokia can make themselves look good with this phone, | but it will probably take many years of good faith from them for | me to ever reconsider | | Also: I've been waiting on Nokias Withings watches to release | their medical applications in the US for _years_ now. | | They could perhaps not get folks with medical issues hopes up if | there is any reason something could be delayed for _multiple | years_ ... | herf wrote: | It's IP52 rated, so not water-safe like the IP67 and IP68 from | other smartphones. But it probably costs less to fix even so. | t0bia_s wrote: | 76.2mm weight is huge. No deal to me unfortunately. Otherwise | great idea that hopefully be a standard in future. | jimnotgym wrote: | Wow HN. I really interesting new product comes out, a really | interesting turn in the right to repair debate, and a return of a | famous brand. | | And instead of talking about that, there are a series of threads | about how an iphone costing 5 times as much and is famously | difficult to repair is a better phone than this. Get a grip! Can | we not have a least one conversation without Apple fanbois wading | in? | sva_ wrote: | Thats like the recent thread where someone asked for a good | Linux laptop, and the top comment was to buy a mac. | | I'll never understand this brand loyalism/consumer mentality, | and to what lengths Apple folks will go to promote, justify, | and defend their purchase decisions. | nazka wrote: | I don't get it. Why a Mac cannot be a good Linux laptop? | eptcyka wrote: | They can, but none of the current ones are well supported. | nazka wrote: | Ah ok thanks. Is it because of the new M1/M2 | architecture? | traviswt wrote: | I think Asahi Linux is where the progress is. Looking | promising but rough. Lots of reverse engineering. | sva_ wrote: | I think you'd have to be willing to be extremely | enthusiastic dealing with all the shortcomings of the | experimental support currently. Maybe older MacBooks are | somewhat supported, but the ARM (Asahi Linux) is alpha | right now, and a lot of stuff simply isn't implemented. | | There's also some individual differences, i.e. from what | I've heard you won't ever be able to run something like the | Xen Hypervisor as Apple didn't fully implement the Arm spec | s.t. some opcodes are missing. | willhslade wrote: | I'm not going to wade into this flamewar but I will say one | thing. Apple is what it says on the tin. It's a curated | garden that mostly just works. At a certain point in your | life and your career you don't have weekends to spare on side | projects and, especially in the tools that you use the most | to interact with the Internet (phone, laptop) you want it to | work the first time. I've flirted with Linux and for what it | is, it's great, but I'm mostly done with hunting down drivers | not working. Apple gives me my time back. | Klonoar wrote: | So just to be clear: you want to discuss a smartphone, in a | vacuum, completely ignoring what - barring a few select Android | phones - effectively sets the bar for the industry. | | It's not "fanbois", it's just reality. HN isn't the one that | needs to get a grip here. | jimnotgym wrote: | People could compare the Nokia to comparable phones perhaps? | There are other repairable phones available, although I don't | recall any this cheap? | | In other news my Ford is not as comfortable as your Rolls | Royce, and my Sekonda watch is not going to last like your | Rolex.... | [deleted] | Klonoar wrote: | _> People could compare the Nokia to comparable phones | perhaps?_ | | They could! And in fact, do. | | OP, however, is complaining about _the existence_ of the | Apple comparison, which is simply unavoidable. I 'm just | responding that instead of complaining about it, move on to | the discussions that float your boat. | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote: | Since when has Apple ever made an easily repairable budget | anything? This is a niche in which Apple is non existent. | dzhiurgis wrote: | Since last year their phones have best ranking | https://www.ifixit.com/smartphone-repairability | | (Yes Fairphone have excellent score too, but they are | basically ancient) | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote: | Not sure how you read that as the best ranking. Only | among flagship phones, which is a market where | repairability is largely an afterthought. | | Fairphone is a repairable budget phone. You can't compare | budget to flagship on performance or modernity of the | hardware. That makes no sense. | dartharva wrote: | The iPhone does not set any bar for budget phones. | Irrelevant. | Klonoar wrote: | It's not irrelevant. :) | | Buying a "budget" phone that has no guarantee of long term | parts availability, OS upgrades, etc is certainly worth | comparing to Apple's lowest cost devices factored out over | the sheer number of years they offer support/service for. I | appreciate the aspect of right-to-repair on this device and | I'm not saying the device shouldn't exist, but it's the | height of absurdity to think it wouldn't get compared to | Apple's devices at some point in the conversation. | | Hell, even conversations about the Fairphone end up drawing | these same comparisons since Apple's recycling program is | pretty good. | smoldesu wrote: | That's one way of looking at it. | | On the other side of the coin, _all_ Apple devices have | an expiry date. Many Android phones unlock their | bootloader and enable community support after the vendor | has thrown in the towel. Nothing similar exists on iOS, | and it 's a damn shame - it forces Apple to depreciate | usable hardware. In a world where reuse and reduction is | preferable to recycling, Apple should stop pretending | like it's free recycling program is a replacement for | serviceable design and open hardware. Until Apple stops | being a necessary step of the recycling process, | recycling iPhones is no easier than disposing of | Asbestos. | | People (rightfully) get pissed when others shit on | camera-shy companies like Nokia or Dell trying something | repair-friendly. You're like the person who's saying that | nobody should buy the Raspberry Pi because your 1u | rackmount has better performance-per-dollar. You're not | wrong, but it's an apples-to-oranges product comparison. | lopatin wrote: | I just assumed the repair kit is for anything the Nokia is | dropped on rather than the phone itself. | mikkom wrote: | It's worth noting that even if this phone is called "Nokia" | it doesn't have much to do with original Nokia phones. It's a | new company that bought the rights to use the Nokia brand | name. | e63f67dd-065b wrote: | There's a funny story here, HMD Global just so happens to | have very similar execs and employees as the former Nokia, | some of whom work in the HQ that just so happens to be | right across from the old Nokia HQ. The company is very | much a spiritual successor to Nokia. | sheeparepayed wrote: | Maybe the Apple fanboys are payed to help manufacture demand. | Wouldn't be ao far fetched. | Towaway69 wrote: | Or keeping the price up on the second hand market? | nonethewiser wrote: | > And instead of talking about that, there are a series of | threads about how an iphone costing 5 times as much and is | famously difficult to repair is a better phone than this. Get a | grip! Can we not have a least one conversation without Apple | fanbois wading in? | | I agree with your sentiment but think we overestimate how much | people value right to repair. This is some proof. | justinclift wrote: | > we overestimate how much people value right to repair. | | After all this time, perhaps it's more stockholm syndrome? | rconti wrote: | And instead, I join the comments, and the top-rated post is a | counter-rant about Apple fanbois that's frankly no more | constructive or useful than the content it's complaining about. | izacus wrote: | I've noticed that modern Americans really really really dispise | choice on the market. If it differs even a little bit from the | average, watered down "majority" choice, it's immediately | attacked and disparaged. You need to be part of the ingroup, | have the same brands in your hand and on your body. Like the | 1984 Apple ad - everyone with gray iphone, gray MacBook and | AirPods in their ears. | zamnos wrote: | Why do I have such a different impression? I go to a | supermarket and see 30 different kinds of toothpaste, 50 | kinds of chips, and a dozen different kinds of alcoholic | seltzer waters in the liquor aisle. The paradox of choice is | tiring! | arcanemachiner wrote: | An easy fix is to have a modicum of self esteem. | hot_gril wrote: | No. I have nothing against choice, I just want the best | phone, and it's not this. If only there were a thriving set | of standards for mobile/desktop web apps that obviates the | need to stick to the iPhone/Android OS duopoly cemented by | their app stores, I'd probably change phones. | bitdeveloper wrote: | I mean, I have to figure out which peanut butter to buy from | a shelf of 37 peanut butters. If anything, there's too much | choice in a lot of cases. It's tiring. | | I've heard way more Android users disparaging iPhones than | vice versa. If anything, the fault of iPhone users is not | even knowing or caring anything else exists. | tomrod wrote: | > one conversation without Apple fanbois wading in? | | Aye. Almost like we shouldn't have a conversation about Android | without mentioning the spyware and telemetry that both Android | and IOS collect being more than enough reason to use Purism and | other open alternatives. | | #stallman_was_right | rektide wrote: | Right to repair, but the software is uttely unmaintainable & | actively rotting. | | This is cool, but it shows how bad the Android world is. The | hardware is only half the picture. | | Iphone just happens to be the obvious comparison. | jrm4 wrote: | Seriously, what is meant by this? | | I'm asking as someone who way back when had a nokia n900, did | some android rooting, then when that got unrewarding | essentially switched to "whatever is second cheapest at Best | Buy at the time" and have had zero major problems doing | pretty much all the regular life things (and this includes | e.g. Pokemon Go with the kids?) | rektide wrote: | Few phones even support rooting anymore. Most phones never | ever get a new kernel, & most kernels are incredibly | difficult vendor-provided messes whose source is basically | useless, utterly incompatible with upstream Linux & unable | to be applied at all to newer kernel versions. Maybe maybe | maybe the new Android plan of creating stable interfaces | for drivers improves this but it's to soon to tell. | | The n900 was from an actual Linux era. Versus Android which | was a sideways port of Danger's mobile OS onto Linux, & | unlike Maemo ignoring the entire Linux userland/freedesktop | stack. | pimeys wrote: | I've been looking for a browser extension I could use to filter | certain things out from my internet feeds. For example making | anything related to Apple completely vanish for me. I wonder | could the GPT be utilized for this? | cwillu wrote: | I made an Ask HN post on this subject a while back. Got 10 | upvotes before it got flagged and hidden. :) | pimeys wrote: | I actually stopped reading HN as much as I used to in the | past 10+ years because of this. I found out running a small | fediverse server and just curating my own feed keeps all | the Apple stuff out from my view, and it's also easy to | just hide/ban/filter people. It's sad, because I really | don't want to jump in into many HN threads anymore... | capableweb wrote: | User-scripts is what you're looking for, commonly use to | customize your browsing experience with small JS scripts. Can | be run with for example TamperMonkey. Writing a script that | blacks out or filters comments with a mention of Apple would | be trivial ("if .comment's innerText contains Apple, | $element.remove()" in short) | r0fl wrote: | Why would I care about a DIY repair phone? Am I to assume that | all of a sudden I'm a phone repair expert and when I take my | phone apart I'll be able to put it together perfectly and keep | the same waterproof levels as a manufacturer would? | | This is at best an out of the box marketing gimmick by Nokia to | sell some phones. | [deleted] | liendolucas wrote: | Yes, but is not only the right to repair. For how long Nokia is | willing to manufacture spare parts for this phone? A year, two? | What if after 3 year my phone breaks and I can't repair it not | because a repair issue per se but because of part availability. | This already happened to me with a Nokia 7 Plus, which is a | phone I like because it came with Android One. Now on the tech | side, the phone is just fine, camera specs, screen is really | good, battery is still good. I broke the charging board and the | screen. Original parts for it no longer produced, only OEM ones | with lower quality. So I would take this with a grain of salt. | So will I need to buy the phone and immediately a pack of spare | parts just in case because tomorrow they will be no longer | available? | bingo-bongo wrote: | To be fair: "..and genuine parts available for five years | via.." | | ..but even so, it's still a valid concern. | SergeAx wrote: | Apple fanboys really need to convince themselves that their | phones are better, otherwise it's an existential threat for | their egos. | stodor89 wrote: | No, it seems we can't. Welcome to 2023! | dotnet00 wrote: | Fawning over Apple products is inescapable here. Anything with | a CPU must be compared to overly magical interpretations of an | M1's capabilities. | mlinksva wrote: | The positive (and there's plenty of criticism; search and read) | point being made about iphone is that it has a longer support | duration. This seems highly complementary to repairability -- | both seem important to maximize useful life -- and thus an | entirely fair point, no? | | I'm recently on my 4th Android smartphone in 12 years (Galaxy | S, Moto G, Pixel 2, Pixel 7) and would be still on the Pixel 2 | if not for lack of updates, as it's still completely fine | hardware wise. I guess if I had been an Apple fanboi, I | would've had at least 1 fewer phones in that time period. | Really made me think this last time. Hoping my eventual 5th | smartphone will have very long support and very good | repariability. | logifail wrote: | > The positive (and there's plenty of criticism; search and | read) point being made about iphone is that it has a longer | support duration | | Yup, and the OTA updates with Tesla are also better than | you'd get on a car that's 1/10th of the price. Isn't it just | a little bit over-entitled to bring up any iPhone _in a | discussion about budget phones_? | | Newsflash: the vast majority of the planet can't afford to | drop $1000+ on a mobile device. | mlinksva wrote: | Newsflash (just looked it up), an iphone se is $429, a used | one is cheaper, and factoring in support duration, may be | cheaper yet. A friend who would've been among the last | people I'd expect to use an iphone blogged this | https://announce.asheesh.org/2022/09/i-switched-to-iphone- | fo... | | I'm really embarrased by this (I've been a borderline Apple | hater basically my whole life) but also acknowledge | reality. | logifail wrote: | > a used one is cheaper, and factoring in support | duration, may be cheaper yet | | Q: For all those hundreds of millions of people who have | paid less than $150 for their phone, how many of them | even gave a second thought to _the support duration_ when | they decided what to purchase? | mlinksva wrote: | I'd guess approximately the same number as those who have | given a second thought to repairability, i.e., | negligible. I'm all for increasing demand for both at the | margins, including as part of savvier consumers' | financial calculus. | rustymonday wrote: | I had an iPhone 4 many years ago, and Apple nerfed it with | software updates when the iPhone 6 came out. These updates | significantly slowed down the phone, pretty much forcing me | to get a new one after only two years. So I bought an Android | and never looked back. | vanilla_nut wrote: | Wouldn't that be 4 years? I also had an iPhone 4 ruined by | the last iOS updates, but because of the S years it was: | 4->4S->5->5S->6, so 4 years before battery life and | performance went bad. | whitemary wrote: | Apple actually lost a lawsuit over this, but of course it | didn't matter because the capitalist government theatre is | controlled by the ruling class protecting their own, so | Apple still came out on top. | arcanemachiner wrote: | The iPhone 4 slowdown came several years before | "batterygate". | naijaboiler wrote: | i remember my initial ipad2. Yeah new ipads came out, | updated, and the old one became too slow to use after the | updates. I hated apple products for a long time after | that. that was 2013 | qwytw wrote: | IIRC due to the degrading/faulty(?) batteries they had to | choose between random shutdowns and slowing down the | phone. I'm not sure I agree with the way they handled | this but I don't think they did that because of | "corporate greed". | Nextgrid wrote: | I wouldn't be so generous. Slowing down the phone without | any notification is a major problem. Had they added a | notification this was happening, there would be no | problems at all. | | Of course, adding such a notification would've prompted | many users to seek out battery replacements (and a lot of | non-Apple-authorized repair shops would've been happy to | meet this demand) and give a new life to their devices, | where as silently slowing down their device would prompt | those users to eventually upgrade once they get tired of | it. | goosedragons wrote: | Yeah, they didn't tell Apple Geniuses either IIRC so when | users came into the store complaining about a slow phone | they weren't recommending a $99 battery replacement but a | $699 iPhone 7. | bmitc wrote: | > The positive point being made about iphone is that it has a | longer support duration. | | How so? Apple iPhones have one year warranties, are | notoriously difficult to repair, and Apple charges an arm and | a leg to "repair" them (usually by basically forcing you to | do a trade-in and buy a new phone). Apple products will also | quickly degrade over iOS upgrades. | | For example, my iPad Air 2 can barely browse the web with no | other apps open. | nordsieck wrote: | > How so? Apple iPhones have one year warranties, are | notoriously difficult to repair ... | | I think your parent was talking about OS support. | mlinksva wrote: | How so? Apologies for not being specific, I was referring | to support for security updates. | tomrod wrote: | > This seems highly complementary to repairability -- both | seem important to maximize useful life -- and thus an | entirely fair point, no? | | Repairability is more that once you buy it, you actually own | it. | | Apple does not support this model. Real repairability is when | you can hack all components of hardware and software in your | domain (which precludes hacking against cell towers, ISP | telecom equipment, etc.). | TazeTSchnitzel wrote: | Nor do most Android vendors. | tomrod wrote: | Correct, though that isn't concomitant to the point under | discussion. | nordsieck wrote: | > I'm recently on my 4th Android smartphone in 12 years | (Galaxy S, Moto G, Pixel 2, Pixel 7) and would be still on | the Pixel 2 if not for lack of updates, as it's still | completely fine hardware wise. I guess if I had been an Apple | fanboi, I would've had at least 1 fewer phones in that time | period. Really made me think this last time. | | In regards to longterm OS support, iPhones have been getting | better and better[1]. 6-7 years is pretty darn good for the | last batch to fall out of support (6+, 7, and SE). It'll be | interesting to see when the next batch (8 and X) of iPhones | falls off the cliff. | | --- | | 1. https://www.statista.com/chart/5824/ios-iphone- | compatibility... | MrStonedOne wrote: | [dead] | gambiting wrote: | On the other hand I can still get modern versions of android | with all the security updates for some ancient android | phones, you just have to do a tiny bit of tinkering with | unlocking the bootloader first. That's something you can't do | with any iPhone. | lallysingh wrote: | Does that compete much against a $150-ish phone with 3 years | of software support and super cheap, user replacable parts? I | think it's making excuses that the iPhone isn't just a giant | burning money pit for customers. Why are folks in a | completely different market segment comparing the two? | nhchris wrote: | They're comparing them because software support _shouldn | 't_ be a problem, regardless of market segment. You can run | fully up to date linux on 15 year old computers, but in | moving to phones, they destroyed what we took for granted. | This is a manufactured problem, and it's no coincidence | that it lines the pockets of smartphone makers. | lallysingh wrote: | Support costs money, and it's part of the price. This | moralizing is ridiculous. | acdha wrote: | That's why this discussion matters: Apple devices have | much longer lifespans because their economic model is | correctly aligned -- Apple doesn't mind if you hold your | iPhone for years because your use of things like the App | Store, Apple Music, etc. also fund their OS development. | | On Android, that's fractured: Qualcomm wants you buying a | new phone every year or two because they only get paid | for CPUs and Google doesn't want to subsidize them with | Play purchases. | | This is amplified because the architecture prevents | people from doing their own support. A PC user can run | Linux even if Microsoft gives up because the boot loader | isn't locked to prevent it, although driver support does | show there are still problems here for the fraction of | hardware without robust open source drivers or documented | firmware. | | My ideal fix for this would be legislative, requiring | mandatory minimum support lifetimes (say 7-10 years for | at least prompt security updates) and some threshold for | requiring boot loader unlocking. The only Android device | I had was a Lenovo tablet which they never updated to the | OS version released a month or so _before_ the hardware, | and which became unsafe to use on the internet many years | before the hardware failed (we used it as a white noise | generator for a baby). That's a ton of e-waste which | could have been avoided if they weren't allowed to just | walk away from support because they didn't sell enough | units to care. | nhchris wrote: | That's my point - it _doesn 't_ cost money on PC. I don't | need "support" from my motherboard vendor to install the | latest linux. | lallysingh wrote: | Yeah. Part of that is radio support (open source phone | projects have had this problem) and packaging - you still | need a separate packaged image per phone model. Openmoko | had the support problem (iirc) pretty early on. | | Until those ecosystem issues are fixed, dumping on a $150 | phone for concessions that a $800-1000 phone doesn't have | to make us pretty ridiculous. | Nextgrid wrote: | > radio support | | What do you mean? Wireless cards on PCs are dirt cheap | and have fantastic forwards-compatibility with future OS | releases. There's no reason mobile network cards should | be any different. | | > you still need a separate packaged image per phone | model | | Only if you insist on packaging the image yourself. If | you don't lock bootloaders and provide API/ABI | documentation on how to interact with your hardware | (through a binary blob if necessary), the community will | often do the rest. | | The Android update dumpster fire is a self-inflicted | problem. | nhchris wrote: | > Until those ecosystem issues are fixed | | Again, that is my point. No company has any incentive, or | has made any moves to, fix the ecosystem. They're happy | how there are no standards or documented APIs, how | everything is a closed binary blob that changes from one | insignificant version to the next. They don't demand any | kind of support or openness from hardware suppliers, they | don't form any standards or demand adherence to them, | despite their massive market power (if Samsung wanted | open or standards-compliant hardware, they'd get it), | _because they directly financially benefit from the | broken status quo they created_. | | > concessions that a $800-1000 phone doesn't have to make | | You can spend 2x that on an Android phone, and the | software situation won't be any better. This is | deliberate. | [deleted] | lallysingh wrote: | Actually this phone is less then 1/4th the price | crabbone wrote: | This is disingenuous. | | If price was the reason, we'd have phones with longer | term support at a higher price point. The problem is that | support is _cheaper_ than making new stuff, but the | companies would rather sell a more expensive good if they | can prevent customers from buying the cheaper option. | | Support is cheaper for customers because companies | providing support have to invest into something customers | want, but doesn't create the same competitive advantage | in the market where stakes are always rising. I.e. | companies are incentivized to replace rather than support | because they need to amortize the cost of R&D that goes | into making phones with more memory / storage / cameras / | hoo-hoo-ga-ga. If instead the effort is diverted into | support, that effort doesn't generate future revenues as | much as the effort spent on, well, future technologies. | | So, the customers don't get good service not because it's | impossible or prohibitively expensive, but because of the | lack of a free platform (equivalent to Linux on PC), and | a lack of regulation that would make it necessary for | manufacturers to provide longer term support to their | products (which would've leveled the field, because | everyone would have to provide similar length of service, | and so the competitive edge would stay the same). | | As long as the manufacturers are in the rats race for the | fraction of the future market, they'll cut every corner | possible to get a bigger slice. The cost and the price | _today_ aren 't as much of a concern for them as the | survival in the next few years. | dzhiurgis wrote: | Depends how likely either one is to break. I haven't had | case on my latest iPhones for 4 years and never seen break | it at all. Also - how waterproof is this Nokia? | leoedin wrote: | I think I've had 3 phones in the time my wife has had 1 | iPhone 7. Every time I buy a new phone I'm like "but Android | is cheaper", but I'm fairly sure the lifetime cost of "phone" | is in her favour at this point. I think my next phone will be | an iPhone. | dmix wrote: | Don't forget AppleCare+ if you do. Not worrying about | broken screens ($200/each replacement without vs $30 | service fee, with $100 one time AppleCare fee for 2yrs) and | getting replacement phones on the spot for other damage is | really a huge anxiety relief and comes with more savings | than the initial cost. That what helps turn a "phone a | year" into 3yrs. | | Does Google offer something equivalent to AppleCare for | Pixel phones? I guess there's think like Best Buy extended | warranties but I've never had to use one for a phone. I'm | curious how it compares. | 1986 wrote: | They do, with uBreakIFix providing fulfillment: https://s | tore.google.com/us/magazine/preferred_care?hl=en-US | dmix wrote: | Nice looks like it's the exact same service fees for | broken sceens and accidental damage. They copied it | wholesale to be competitive. Which is a good idea. | geraldwhen wrote: | AppleCare will hand you a new phone if you break a new, | flagship model before they have spare parts. I suspect | "UbreakIfix" will not do this. | ptoo wrote: | Re the AppleCare+ point. If you are unlikely to break a | screen more frequently than every 2 years on average, | it's more economical to just not get the service. This is | ignoring other benefits the AppleCare+ may provide. | bombolo wrote: | I used to never break screens, but the newer larger | phones crack, at least on the corners. | crabbone wrote: | I only ever had one smartphone, and that's Samsung Galaxy | S7 (bought in the year it hit the market: 2016). I will | have to replace it very soon though because my banking app | is going to stop supporting the Android version it has, and | Samsung doesn't provide upgrades. | | But... it's not really Android's fault anymore than this is | Samsung's fault. The phone itself is in a good condition. | The battery holds the charge for almost as long as it used | to when bought. Maybe I'm not a typical user, or have very | modest use patterns that allowed this phone to survive this | long. Whichever this is, it shows that it's not really a | problem of Android (I don't like the system for other | reasons). | | Before replacing, I'm going to try to install LineageOS on | it, and, we'll see, maybe I'll get another couple years out | of it. | | At the same time span, my wife burned through 4 | smartphones. All of them died for reasons unrelated to the | operating system they have (i.e. were dropped, stolen etc.) | It's possible that being, in general, cheaper and more | disposable, Android phones don't live as long as iPhones, | but this doesn't mean they shouldn't or cannot live just as | long. | carlmr wrote: | >Whichever this is, it shows that it's not really a | problem of Android | | It kind of is though because Android allows for phone | brands to tweak the stock OS and stop updating even if | the OS itself is getting updates. | | If Android forced all manufacturers to use the stock OS | with updates, the phone could still get updates, no? | asmor wrote: | At least when I still used Android, some SoC | manufacturers made unmaintainable hacky patches for one | specific kernel tree (and sometimes the manufacturer | would then add more customizations to make it even worse) | and you'd be stuck on that kernel forever. | nottorp wrote: | My iPjone XS will turn 4 years old in 2 months. I see no | reason to change it. | | Maybe in 2 more years... | | As for hardware repairs should I need them... there are 3rd | party shops. Dont care what Apple says about genuine parts | or approved parts or whatever. | roywashere wrote: | I have two teenagers. One has an iPhone and he needed a | screen replacement already three times. The other is on | android and he just had his screen broken and bought a new | one, a cheap Samsung phone. Screen replacements are just as | expensive on both ecosystems. But sometimes it is nice to | be able to get an affordable, fresh phone, and not have to | worry as much about loss or theft | | Also the top tier Samsungs are more expensive than iPhones | nowadays | gman83 wrote: | FYI you can get LineageOS 20 (Android 13) for your Pixel 2 | with the latest updates: https://www.xda- | developers.com/lineageos-20-google-pixel-2-a... | mlinksva wrote: | That's defnitely a big benefit. I used LineageOS (whatever | it was called then) to extend the life of my Galaxy S, but | at that time not having a working phone for awhile was a | lot less disruptive to life and work, so I didn't attempt | this time. But once I'm 100% migrated to my new Pixel 7, | I'll certainly put an alternative ROM on the Pixel 2 to | extend its non-phone life! | moremetadata wrote: | >I used LineageOS (whatever it was called then) | | It used to be called CyanogenMod and it was easily hacked | by the UK authority's. | jimnotgym wrote: | Whereas the big vendors don't need hacking, the UK | authorities just have to ask | pizza234 wrote: | I used to be a fan of LineageOS, but after a few devices, | I've found that it's not very robust (for different | reasons). | | There's a bug where location services don't work (and | require a fix). Then my latest phone where I've installed | reboots randomly one or more times per day. Both bugs are | reported, and affect other users. | | The camera app of LineageOS 19 was terrible, and wasn't | able to handle the two cameras of one phone where I've | tried it. | | I will use it in order to make my phone last longer, but I | don't have high hopes (and I'm not a big fan anymore). | scns wrote: | There is this [0]. Gonna fire up Android Studio tomorrow | and try to get the release build going. | | 0: https://github.com/SebaUbuntu/android_packages_apps_Ap | erture | testTED wrote: | Whose "latest updates"? | pedrocr wrote: | Last time I used LineageOS while you got the Android | updates on most devices the underlying kernel and drivers | were stuck at whatever the manufacturer originally shipped, | and that included a bunch of security problems on most | phones. Android security and updates is still a mess after | all these years. For a while Android One seemed to help and | I bought all my phones off that list, but even that's now | gone. At this point anything that's not a Pixel within the | (very short) support window is probably a big risk. Google | really screwed this up. | cookiengineer wrote: | This is all fixed now. Android 11 based ROMs introduced | GSI (generic system images) which allow over the air | updates and they even work with LineageOS. | | Needs a newer underlying linux kernel though, so all the | outdated 2.x kernel ports won't be compatible. | | But I agree with you in your general point. Android OEM | ROMs are a joke when it comes to support and they usually | are out of date within the first year due to lack of | maintenance on the vendor side. | | I wish there was a more generic platform approach to this | where drivers could be just packages instead of this | whole statically built images mess that is also unusable | for most endusers. | dominojab wrote: | [dead] | hammock wrote: | > The point being made about iphone is that it has a longer | support duration. This seems highly complementary to | repairability | | Seems like you might call that "software repairability" | mlinksva wrote: | No, I'd just call it software support duration, or more | narrowly software security update duration. "Software | repairability" basically means FOSS (though I don't want to | underestimate what creative people will do without source | or permission). | cjsplat wrote: | To be clear, the Pixel 2 is unsecurable at reasonable | performance against Spectre style attacks. | | Might not matter to some. | ENGNR wrote: | It's the meta rules: | | I agree - upvote | | I disagree - leave a comment | | But to buck the trend - go Nokia, a phone like an x86 is a | great thing for hackers and to break monopolies, fingers | crossed it finds and connects with a large consumer segment | smoldesu wrote: | Nothing brings people on HN together like technology, business, | and valiently defending Apple from any form of grounded | criticism. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | Unlockable bootloader? HTC Nokia hasn't been permitting that so | far. | pcdoodle wrote: | Sweet, $44 for an OEM screen is pretty good. Thank you Nokia. If | there's a de-google option, this would be the best. | | EDIT: 3.5mm headphone jack too! Wow. | tarkin2 wrote: | I wonder how this compares to the cheapest basic Samsung Android | phone, A03 or similar. I'll definitely consider this as my next | phone should the current one need throwing. | aspyct wrote: | This will be nice if and only if there is a way to install a | custom android version. | | Otherwise it'll be bogged down with bloatware and will be useless | as soon as security updates aren't available anymore. | | But if so, very nice :) | hakfoo wrote: | I have a G20, and it's pretty vanilla Android stock. | | I'm actually excited for this. My family tends to shop in this | price range, and you've got a lot of fairly interchangeable | phones out there. It ends up being sort of frustrating because | there's no obvious right choice. | | Now you have a simple argument. You don't have to deep dive | explain to Mom the difference between CPUs or manufacturer | update policies, just "If this one breaks, it can be fixed | without a huge production number." | | There was a time when one of the (admittedly secondary) | arguments for buying an iPhone or Galaxy S (as opposed to a | cheaper alternative) was that the local fix shops had a lot of | dead scrap units and could arrange for a cheap quick fix, while | if you bought a Nokia or Umidigi, you were waiting weeks for | them to get parts and it was probably twice the cost because | they didn't want to work on a phone they weren't wildly | familiar with. | studentik wrote: | I imagine IntelliJ running on Archlinux from Nokia phone with | wireless high-resolution glasses display | kornhole wrote: | Until someone builds an OS variant for it, you can use the UAD | (Universal Android Debloater) found on Github to remove most of | that. | johnny22 wrote: | are you sure it doesn't? My low end "nokia" from HMD Global has | an option to unlock the bootloader. Maybe this one does as | well. | not_your_vase wrote: | It's a hit or miss with them... my old Nokia 6.1 (ditto HMD) | came with no option to unlock the bootloader. | | Based on some superficial Googling, this phone's predecessor, | G21 also comes without an unlockable bootloader. | johnny22 wrote: | ah. my 6.2 does have an unlockable bootloader. | cvalka wrote: | There's no bloatware since Nokia's Android is Android one. | However, the bootloader is locked and their Android's EOF is | abysmal which is crazy. | PufPufPuf wrote: | Do they seriously lock the bootloader of a "repairable" | phone? That's the most important feature for me, which has | prolonged the life of all my Android devices by several | years. | Groxx wrote: | As long as there's a way to unlock it, does it matter? Do | it once and it's done forever. | cristiioan wrote: | Android one isn't dead? | stephc_int13 wrote: | I'd love seeing a market for DIY smartphones, in the same vein of | the good old PC but also DIY drones or mechanical keyboards. | | That would be an opportunity for specialized boutique suppliers | and probably for some innovation, even as a relatively niche | market. | | I have not seen much evolution in this space during the last 5-7 | years, and I think the form factor is pretty much settled. | Longevity and repairability are things we should prioritize, but | ownership and customization are also important. | | All of that could be built on standardized hardware, something | close to the Raspberry Pi or Arduino. | | I would not mind too much if the device was slightly | bulkier/heavier in the end, I think we could achieve much better | value. | solarkraft wrote: | I'm happy about this! But, while repairability is always great, a | major (maybe the biggest) part of phone obsolescence is due to | software. 2 or 3 years of updates are a joke, Apple does up to 8. | | The best hope here is that this phone's repairability will | attract a software hacking community to provide inofficial | updates, but what a terrible thing to have to rely on. Besides: | Phones by other brands like Pocophone are _plenty_ repairable, | being made for the indian market, and have good community | software support. | | The real next innovation for an Android device maker will be | providing at least 5 years of updates (I'm well aware of the | challenges involved, but these are not that hard, make it so). | IceWreck wrote: | Its a 150 EUR phone, what more do you expect > | solarkraft wrote: | At least 5 years of updates. So much so that I think it | should probably be legally mandated and clearly marketed as | the device's life span. | abliefern wrote: | I expect manufacturers not to offer bad options like a 150 | EUR phone with 3 years of updates. Give me a 200EUR phone | with 5 years? Or a 10EUR service fee per year of updates. | riku_iki wrote: | > The real next innovation for an Android device maker will be | providing at least 5 years of updates | | pixels starting with pixel 6 have 5 years of updates. | nevi-me wrote: | It's unavailable in many markets. Even if one imports it, | there's a risk that it becomes unrepairable (or costly to | repair) if it breaks. | kuschku wrote: | And require me to throw away headphones that have worked fine | for decades. | | Even this nokia phone has a 3.5mm port, why doesn't Google | support it anymore? | riku_iki wrote: | there are connectors. | | > why doesn't Google support it anymore? | | maybe preserve space for something else inside. | topspin wrote: | > pixels starting with pixel 6 have 5 years of updates. | | Nice. Didn't know this. Got a 7 pro shortly after it came | out; spectrum had a $400 discount on them. | psydvl wrote: | Oneplus 11 ships with same support (5 years android updates + | 4 years security updates) | xigency wrote: | > 2 or 3 years of updates are a joke, Apple does up to 8. | | Saying an iPhone can handle 8 generations of iOS updates is a | bigger joke. I'm a cheapskate that somehow uses Apple phones, | and I'll let you know after 2-3 major OS updates the | performance is always severely diminished. | bobbylarrybobby wrote: | Are you sure it's not just that the battery has aged after a | few years? I've of heard many people (myself included) | getting their battery replaced and saying their phone felt | like new. | commandersaki wrote: | I use an 6S that I bought in 2016. It is on its 4th battery | replacement. So I've got almost a full 7 years out of it. | It won't receive any major iOS updates anymore, but will | still receive security updates. I'd continue down this path | for another 2 years, but as a non-iCloud user I want iCloud | Advanced Data Protection to sync Notes and Messages. | paulmd wrote: | No. Your phone becomes damaged (DRAM and flash and | performance problems due to battery) but the phone itself | usually is fine. | | I just got a whole new phone out of a failed battery | replacement - my guess is the OS installation was just too | damaged to accept the battery pairing process and it just | flaked out. I got a refurbished 8+ in consideration, and it's | actually great despite being a 5.5 year old release at this | point. It's not the actual performance level of the phone | itself that's the problem, they just tend to become worn out | at a hardware level and the phone tends to become unstable. | It was showing all kinds of weird software quirks (discord | "send" button would fail to appear when posting a meme and | you'd have to tab back and forth to a different server, etc) | and all of that vanished as soon as I got a new phone. | | While I can't prove it, my opinion is it would have come back | over time even if I did a factory reset, perhaps even worse. | Because I had the same experience with my previous phone, an | Android Moto G first-gen (Falcon), which I owned for just | about 5 years exactly (early 2014-early 2019). The phone | simply got more and more unstable due to bad flash/RAM and | perhaps some glitching caused by the weak battery... first | I'd have to factory reset once in a while, then the whole OS | would need to be reflashed, finally the installs were being | corrupted less than a day after a clean reflash. | | The practical lifespan of the DRAM/flash in a phone seems to | be about 3-4 years in my experience and by the time things | hit 5 years they are so damaged they are unusable even after | fresh OS installs/etc. The timeframe is identical for both my | Moto G and the 8+, I bet if I'd continued to use the same | handset for another year it'd have started corrupting itself | even after a factory reset/etc. | | Again, now that I've got a refurbished 8+ in like new | condition, I can tell you it's still perfectly fine as a | phone/piece of hardware, it's more than fine enough to run | discord and apollo and gmail and all the other things. | natdempk wrote: | If you make a claim like this can you provide details? | | My anecdote: I'm using an iPhone XS that has seen 4+ years of | use across iOS 12-16 (5 major versions) and I haven't noticed | any real consistent slowdowns. I've seen the occasional clear | bug shipped where performance dips from time to time doing | certain specific things, but these seem to be resolved upon | the next update or two usually. | hot_gril wrote: | I felt this way with the 6 because it got downthrottled into | the ditch with iOS-whatever, but my 5 (which I actually got | after the 6 cause it, uh, accidentally broke) was a perfect | phone its entire support life. I even kept it past Apple | support limits and only left it when my cell carrier stopped | working with it entirely. | | I think with newer ones, the OS updates are fine. | mortenjorck wrote: | This was very much the case a decade ago, when using an | iPhone 3GS was a real slog by year 3 or 4, but is anyone | still having those problems today? | | My daily driver is a 2018 iPhone XS, and it's about as snappy | with iOS 16 as I remember it being straight out of the box. | dmix wrote: | My dad uses a 5yr old iPhone X and it runs perfectly fine | with the latest software updates. The baseline CPU (and | RAM) quality has improved dramatically since around then | where it's not a big deal to upgrade. Or maybe the software | has matured enough. | | My mom had a 3yr old mid-teir Samsung phone and tablet | (combo deals they always sell) they both became unusable | when it upgraded to the latest version of Samsung | basterdized Android 2 months ago. But I'm sure Pixels are | more similar to iPhone. | | Sadly most Android come with vendor crippled software. | Maybe the >2yr crippling is the goal for them. | bombolo wrote: | Don't worry, pure android versions also made my phone | slow. | scyzoryk_xyz wrote: | Psh 5 years? What kind of standard of quality is that? | | We should have several decades of support for all cheap | electronics at least... | iamsomeone wrote: | it's a sad day when repairability is a feature | BirAdam wrote: | As other have noted, the lack of updates and locked boot loader | make this a no go, but the state of fully open-source, non- | Android phones OSs is likewise abysmal. As such, leaving the | iPhone isn't going to happen for me. I'm still using my iPhone | 11, and it's still nice and speedy, the battery is fine, it gets | updates quickly, and generally doesn't annoy me too much. If the | PinePhone or PinePhone Pro had a solid, fully functional, open | source, non-Android operating system that was also good with | power management... I would switch without hesitation. That's | just a super high bar, and I don't expect anyone to actually pull | it off any time soon. | Moldoteck wrote: | What do you think about fairphone 4? According to web, it | supports: Fairphone OS CalyxOS DivestOS /e/OS (Murena) iodeOS | LeOS LineageOS postmarketOS Ubuntu Touch | kitsunesoba wrote: | Fairphone isn't and probably won't be available in North | America, sadly. | saiya-jin wrote: | strange comment, comparing apples and oranges, and concluding | your much more expensive orange is better for you... yeah I am | not switch my Samsung s22 ultra for this neither, I find it | very important to state this to the whole world because my own | currently-utterly-unrealistic-to-beat set of reasons | hunter2_ wrote: | Interesting decision about which one is the orange in this | analogy :) | aio2 wrote: | You have high standards for a more simple and cheap product. | TheSkyHasEyes wrote: | > the lack of updates | | This is not a high standard in the year 2023. | Entinel wrote: | Those are high standards? They basically said "I want an | open-source phone that actually works." | makeitdouble wrote: | Is the argument that no open-source phone actually works ? | | On parent's point, the Nokia g22 is 180 euros, the iPhone | 11 at same capacity was 700 euros at launch. You can't | expect Nokia to contractually promise 8 years of OS updates | at that price point. | | To note, iPhone also don't have 5+years of OS support | promises, we're just looking at the trend and assume that | it will continue. I'd also expect this Nokia to have a bit | more than 3 years of support time, we just don't know how | much. | anigbrowl wrote: | _lack of updates and locked boot loader_ | | The boot loader will probably be unlocked sooner or later. It | should be open, but I think it's reasonable to expect either | update support or unlocked booting, not necessarily both. | | In a gook device, that is. You have to remember that most | consumers _do not want_ to know how their phone works or to | become expert in its configuration. They just want it to work. | | A compromise here would be to have an option to unlock | everything, but with the understanding that by doing so you opt | out of warranty service. | | Is your iPhone's boot loader unlocked? | jokoon wrote: | android is open source, nobody can answer me why the pinephone | doesn't use android instead | | android doesn't require google services to work | khimaros wrote: | Glodroid is an AOSP build for PP. | wolfskaempf wrote: | In fact there are versions of Android that run on the | PinePhone like GloDroid, but it's really not the goal. | | The goal behind efforts like the Librem 5 or PinePhone is not | to create yet another Android phone, which Open Source or not | will strengthen the Duopoly of Google and Apple in the Mobile | Phone Operating System market. The goal is to create hardware | that can jump-start the development of a true GNU/Linux | Mobile Operating System. | | With its real world use case, it has brought great advances | to Mobile "Desktop" Environments like Plasma Mobile or Phosh | by motivating developers who could finally use their | creations and improvements on a real phone. | charcircuit wrote: | >of a true GNU/Linux Mobile Operating System. | | Why is GNU important? toybox's coreutils is a good enough | replacement. If you really wanted you could install GNU's | core utils. 99% of users don't want to be messing with | command line tools anyways. | | Android already brought Linux as a mobile operating system | to the mainstream. | jokoon wrote: | why is not the goal? | fsflover wrote: | Having the same OS on my laptop and phone is amazing. | Android turns a general-purpose device into a restricted | one, without a possibility to run desktop apps. | | Desktop OS allows to use desktop apps on the phone and | enjoy convergence: | https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community- | wiki/-/wikis/Freque.... | Nextgrid wrote: | > Android turns a general-purpose device into a | restricted one | | Android still runs the Linux kernel and the only reason | you can't have shell access on it is user-hostile | restrictions, which an open-source build wouldn't have. | | I think it would be a lot easier to add desktop apps | capability to Android for the minority that actually | wants to run Linux apps on their _phone_ than building a | touch-optimized userspace from scratch. | | If your desire is to run Linux desktop apps on Android I | bet you can already do it if you find an X Server APK and | got your Linux app to use it as your X display - that | would've been a quick, pragmatic solution to satisfy the | "Linux desktop" requirement while taking advantage of | Android's mature & battle-tested touch-optimised | userspace. | fsflover wrote: | It's the minority, because people didn't realize yet how | convenient and logical it is. There should be no | difference between a phone and a desktop, except for the | screen size. You don't need to develop independent apps. | You don't need to learn independent tools. | | I can connect a screen and keyboard to my phone and use | it as desktop: https://puri.sm/posts/converging-on- | convergence-pureos-is-co.... | [deleted] | newaccount2021 wrote: | [dead] | bitL wrote: | Ugly notch and no Linux... Not sure what the appeal is? I believe | HMD sales tanked right after they introduced the notch (they | aren't Apple to get away with it) and this phone seems like a way | to clear out unwanted displays via "repairability fans". | mrtksn wrote: | What I wonder is, is it open enough to do software defined radio | and fiddle with the GSM infrastructure? | | Probably not, for that you need Nokia 1100 made in Bochum. | rc_mob wrote: | i never planned to ever leave apple but this here puts a "maybe" | into me | neverrroot wrote: | Nokia, what it once was, and where it's playing at now. They | weren't very friendly nor open back in the days, but time has its | ways. Happy to see them do this now. | openplatypus wrote: | > Security updates: 3 years of monthly security updates | | That is such a let-down! If Nokia is serious about | sustainability, it needs to make it 5y+. | | I get it, it is not easy. But with the proliferation of malware | and exploits, after 3y (since release, not purchase) this phone | is nothing but a liability. | tomComb wrote: | That just refers to the security updates that require a full | firmware update. I think people get focussed on that because | they're used to the iPhone where that's only way to fix | security issues. On android, the majority of security issues | are patched immediately and silently through the play store, so | that continues pretty much for the life of the phone. | | In other words, updates are much less important on android than | they are on the iPhone. | uallo wrote: | > so that continues pretty much for the life of the phone. | | I'm on a Pixel 1 with Android 10. Last security update it got | was from October 2019 which is about three years after the | phone was introduced. | | Is this supposed to be different on newer Android versions? | tomComb wrote: | That refers to the formal (full firmware) updates, I'm | talking about security updates that get pushed to the phone | without you having to do anything. | | It started with the browser component many years ago, and | has grown its coverage with each version. The limitations | are mainly in the kernel, but they now even do graphics | drivers this way (though that requires vendor cooperation, | unlike everything else), but you wouldn't have that with | Android 10. | | This capability has steadily grown to cover more of the OS | over time, particularly recently, so unfortunately, Yes, | Android 10 does have much less of this ability then later | versions. | uallo wrote: | > That refers to the formal (full firmware) updates, I'm | talking about security updates that get pushed to the | phone without you having to do anything. | | It is called "Android security patch level", that is not | a full firmware update. It may still be something else | than you have in mind, though. (How) can I check the | patch level of the security updates you are relating to? | tomComb wrote: | My understanding of this capability is that it started | with the browser component and grew from there, | suggesting that it happens automatically and there is | nothing you need to check. But someone has pointed out | that all the Framework vulnerabilities are still listed | as being addressed by full, old-fashioned security | updates, so I must admit that there is something I'm | missing here. | Gigachad wrote: | It isn't. The situation is so dire on Android right now | morsch wrote: | Here's the security bulletin for January: | https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2023-01-01 | | How do I determine which, if any, of these is fixed via the | Play store update mechanism? | nevi-me wrote: | The bulletin specifies only CVE-2023-20912 as being fixed | by Play Store. https://source.android.com/docs/security/bul | letin/2023-01-01... | abliefern wrote: | Wow. So "the majority of security issues are patched | immediately and silently through the play store" seems | catastrophically incorrect. | tomComb wrote: | Well, yes, I have to agree. See the other comment I just | posted. My understanding is that they are at the point | (at least now with Android 13, which is what the Nokia | will presumably ship with) that they can update most of | userland (and even graphics drivers though that requires | vendor participation), so they should be able to address | Framework vulnerabilities, which is the critical | discrepancy here. | tomComb wrote: | I'm puzzled ... I can understand why the BLE drivers | would still require a firmware update (and that is fine | since drivers for older hardware shouldn't be much of a | problem), but why wouldn't all of the Framework | vulnerabilities be handled via Play Store updates. I | believe that all of the Framework is updatable in this | way. Perhaps it's because that is not true of Android 10 | so they need to address it in a firmware update anyway? | openplatypus wrote: | Never had an iPhone. | | I don't know what comes through Play Store, only thing it | tells me is that specific app was updated. | | All I know is that my cell phone vendors tells I am not | getting more security updates. | | Consumers should not understand CVEs to feel safe. | jimnotgym wrote: | Cheap phones are becoming an interesting decent proposition. | | I could get one of these, add that to my laptop and a full frame | mirrorless camera I bought recently. I could buy all of them for | less than my daughters new iPhone. A proper computer, a proper | camera and a smartphone! | squarefoot wrote: | Close, but no cigar. After 3 years or 2 major Android versions it | still becomes an unsupported doorstop doomed to rot in a drawer | until the owner throws it into a landfill. I totally understand | not wanting to put resources into supporting old products, so the | punchline should have been "...and after support is ceased, we | unlock the bootloader". Now that would have made it interesting. | BLKNSLVR wrote: | Bootloader should be unlockable, via a process that prevents | accidentally doing it, from release. | | Custom ROM from day 1 may delay the need to replace the | battery. | haunter wrote: | https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=nokia+g22 | | It's on the level of a 2017 Google Pixel 2. I mean not bad but | it' also PS150/200EUR. For that much I'd rather get a used iPhone | 11. | Illotus wrote: | Largely depends on the market, where I am used iPhone 11 | without major flaws costs little over 300 euros. | mikejarema wrote: | Why doesn't Nokia allow me to preorder or sign up to be notified | when the device is released/available in my market? | | A search for g22 on nokia.com yields zero (!!) results. | https://www.nokia.com/search/global/en/G22 | | I'll be shopping for a new phone soon and am interested in this | model. But wow, they've missed a huge opportunity to capture that | interest and let me know when I can buy! | luckyshot wrote: | I can get notified with this link (in spanish, though): | https://www.nokia.com/phones/es_es/nokia-g-22/buy?sku=101S06... | louison11 wrote: | People, don't fight. There is a different consumer persona for | each of the brands you're comparing. People who like to be geeky | and fix their own phones and install custom ROMs etc will keep on | loving Android and phones like this one. People who have other | priorities, just want the best phone on the market, just want it | to work, and don't mind paying more to fix it if it breaks, will | go Apple. I don't think anyone here will question that Apple | always is 2 years ahead of Android phone makers. Don't compare | what's not comparable. | mclightning wrote: | Nokia, brand, has been milked to the brim at this point... | a1371 wrote: | This seems like a Savvy move from Nokia. At least in my country, | Nokia phones are remembered for the following: | | - nearly indestructible | | - well priced | | - back pops out | | Nokia is doing the most sensible thing to reuse these as its | differentiator. | | I understand people taking about the OS. But Nokia has little | control over the software and it has also never been its selling | point for me with Symbian, and later Windows Phone. | | I sure miss their wonky phones with weirdly arranged buttons and | their random quirks. | aspyct wrote: | I applaud this initiative by Nokia, and can't wait to lay my | hands on one of those phones when mine dies, but let's be real: | it won't be as tough as the 3310. | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | Did Nokia used to manufacture there own phones? | | Or have they always just done design - like Apple - and someone | else manufactured them? | cromulent wrote: | They used to make them. A manufacturing company from way | back, they were the biggest manufacturer of phones from about | 1998 to 2011. | | Now HMD make them, I think. | Yujf wrote: | HMD designs and sells them, Foxconn makes them | shp0ngle wrote: | Nokia nowadays has nothing to do with the original company. The | name was moved around, first to Microsoft, now it's some | Chinese company I think? | calacatta wrote: | Apple seen backing up an all-new Brinks truck to Stephen Elop's | WindowsCE-themed garage... | poisonborz wrote: | Why is it so hard to add a removeable back cover to have | swappable battery? | | Seemingly battery replacement can still be done "in 5 minutes" | but this still makes pop-out/on the road battery swapping | unpractical. https://www.trustedreviews.com/reviews/nokia-g22 | crazygringo wrote: | Waterproofing is the main reason. | | But then thickness and aesthetic "cheapness" is a secondary | one. | | A removeable cover and battery is always going to introduce a | _little_ bit of thickness, which on a thin phone _is_ | noticeable even if not major. | | And then whether you have screws or the ridges for removing the | cover, it just always feels a little "cheap". You can't get the | same kind of rounded smooth glass or aluminum backing that | wraps seamlessly around the edges. | | And when people are comparing two phones in their hands, the | one that feels more "premium" is often the one they'll go with | if they feel they're already paying a premium price. This is an | object they hold in their hand _all day long_. And if you live | in a major city, it 's really not a big deal to get your | battery replaced after 2 years at an Apple Store. | dsego wrote: | > Waterproofing is the main reason. | | Samsung Galaxy S5 | rg111 wrote: | Only forced obsoleting by the company. No other reasons exist. | | I and tens of millions other people used removable back cover | phones for years before the sealed phone became the norm. | | Edit: Can anyone explain why they think that this is wrong? I | am genuinely interested. | | I really used user-removable battery phones for close to a | decade. I found no issues. | michaelteter wrote: | > Can anyone explain why they think that this is wrong? | | I suspect it is this: > Only forced obsoleting by the | company. No other reasons exist. | | While companies do want you to buy the newest version every | year or two, it is more likely that cost-benefit analysis | tells them to build the way they build; they know they must | release newer better phones periodically because the | competition will do this also. But to support older phones | has a cost, and at some point those old phones don't generate | enough revenue to justify the cost of supporting them. | KarlKemp wrote: | You can't think of another reason? Not maybe any of those | mentioned in the thread? | | And then you can't think of reasons for the downvotes? | | I see a pattern, maybe? | petee wrote: | Could be wrong (please correct me) but i recall hearing that | allowing a customer to change a battery (e.g, 3rd party) on a | chargable device can change the safety of the product/UL rating | or whatever, so it could simply be a certification thing. | | Not exactly the same thing, but I have a Garmin heartrate chest | strap with a replaceable battery (no charging) -- in the US the | cover swivels open to change, but in Australia it requries a | screw, for child safety rules. I Thought that was interesting | Zak wrote: | There's a specific issue with young children eating button- | cell lithium batteries, which I'm guessing is what your | Garmin device uses. Australia appears to have a law requiring | the battery compartments of such devices to be child- | resistant. | | I'm not sure if any countries have similar regulations | related to larger Li-ion rechargeable batteries. | | https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022C00445 | throwanem wrote: | The tradeoff is "back cover that comes off in an instant, | whenever you want it to" versus "back cover that comes off in | an instant, even when you don't want it to." | atchoo wrote: | I never had a problem with a Note 4. | | The way you could buy cases that replaced the back cover | meant for a much thinner profile phone than the typical metal | case wrapped in silicone. | | Replaceable batteries are glorious. I never plugged-in my | phone, just flipped the battery with one from the charger | when I left the house. Instant 100% battery. Travelling? Just | take a few charged batteries at a fraction of the weight of a | power-bank and much more convenient. | dkjaudyeqooe wrote: | Somehow this very important use case is lost on modern | phone makers. | cptaj wrote: | My decades of experience with easily removable back covers | tells me this is a complete non-issue. | | The back cover coming off accidentally has never happened to | me. | Tempest1981 wrote: | For me, it's more of a fidget-spinner. I keep popping it | off and on when bored. | dsr_ wrote: | It happened to me repeatedly with two different phones, but | never when I had a protective case on the phone -- and I | always buy one. | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | Why can't the back cover just screw on and off? | | How often do you need to replace your battery? Maybe twice in | 4 years? What percentage of people keep a phone for more than | 4 years? 5%? | billfor wrote: | Not so much replacing as swapping for a spare to double | life without recharging. | 6510 wrote: | I had a dumb phone back in the days that ran on 4 | conventional AA batteries. Opening the lid and swapping 4 | batteries is less convenient than swapping a single flat | cell but its so much better than being wired to the wall or | using a clumsy power bank with a cable that is always to | short and to long at the same time. The whole charging | ritual is far more absurd than it seems. The screen needs | to power down, there has to be a power savings mode. With | intense use (normal?) and erratic charging patterns | batteries degrade much faster than advertised. I mean, I | read _" lifespan is 2 - 3 years, which is about 300 - 500 | charge cycles"_ when actually used you get about 5 hours | out of a charge. real use say 3 months, running from socket | to socket. LOL | | Cant stop laughing thinking about it, luxurious homes with | all the trimmings then have the whole family gather around | the extension cord. Like on a construction site. Imagine | guns worked like this. We can glue in the cartridge and | you'd be able to shoot people for many years? 6 shots | should be enough for 3 years when the software expires. | twobitshifter wrote: | With the Samsung S5, I'd take a couple extra batteries with me | when traveling. Never had to worry about a dead battery or | bother with a power bank. | | That phone was waterproof but had a special ridge around the | back panel. | aspyct wrote: | I actually prefer power bank to spare batteries. | | Spare batteries can only be used with the phone, whereas | power banks are standard and usable with many other devices | if needed. | | Also, small phone batteries usually don't come with a | carrying case. They're fragile and you could accidentally | short them. | tastyfreeze wrote: | Check out the Samsung XCover phones if you want that kind of | battery swap. | BurningFrog wrote: | I suspect waterproof-ness is one issue. | sasas wrote: | With this handset, does repairable == right to repair the | operating system == supported jailbreaking? | | I recently went though some frustration to root a Samsung handset | - it required sorting through endless blog posts linking random | executables from megaupload or google drive. Fragmented | instructions on various forums; many incomplete or incorrect. | | Which Android handsets best support rooting/jailbreaking by the | vendor which provides a supported way to both unlock the | bootloader and provide root access? | fancyfredbot wrote: | I have owned a fairphone 3, and honestly it was a let down - very | expensive to buy and also expensive to repair (the replacement | mainboard cost more than a newer better phone). Perhaps this was | because of the sustainable sourcing they used but the upshot was | that it became ewaste just as quickly as any other phone. This | one should at least be cheap to repair! | ta8903 wrote: | It's nice that this phone is "officially" repairable which means | you can buy the parts straight from Nokia and do the repairs | yourself but keep in mind that most popular Android phones (even | the cheap Chinese ones) are already repairable, you can look up | instructions on how to open the back panel on youtube and buy the | parts off aliexpress and do the repair yourself, or with brands | like Xiaomi which have large presences in some countries you can | have them do it, for much cheaper than it would cost for this | phone. | davesque wrote: | ... _and_ it comes with two guitar picks! | octacat wrote: | Just unglued my samsung to replace battery/usb c. The mobile | network does not work now. I guess getting something repairable | is not a bad idea. Probably shorted, because you cannot | disconnect battery without removing mid frame (and oh god that's | hard). | circuit10 wrote: | Why does it have a notch but a thick bottom bezel? I thought the | point of the notch was so that you could make the screen cover | the whole display? Why can they not just move the screen down a | bit to get the bezel to the top, remove the notch and put the | camera at the top? | indymike wrote: | This is pretty common on lower-end devices and I think the | answer is it looks more "high end" to they buyer. | bitL wrote: | Ask HMD, they made some boneheaded design decisions in the last | gen, thinking they are Apple to get away with it. Their sales | showed otherwise and now they probably need to get rid of | components they bough in advance, so here comes a repairable | phone. | pipeline_peak wrote: | It would be nice if some company went against this obsession with | ultra thin phones. Then we could go back to ACTUAL replaceable | batteries, maybe durability too, something Nokia used to take | pride in. | | Yes I'd like a 2mm thick phone with 6 cameras I can replace every | year. I'd like my phone to get closer and closer to toilet paper | clogging the pipes of this planet. | system2 wrote: | Time flies and 3 years update is nothing. Remember the beginning | of covid days? More than 3 years ago. So if you bought this phone | those days now it was in the garbage bin. I don't want to spend | time and effort to buy a phone every 2-3 years. Buy an iPhone, | they replace the battery for you for $69 even after 3 years. | iPhones are rock-solid and get 6-7 years of updates. | cromulent wrote: | Totally agree. But I would love a competitor. This smells like | the start of one, if compromised by committee. | aeyes wrote: | But your device is still perfectly usable after the last | update. It will probably take at least 2 years before apps | refuse to work on that version. | | By the way: In 3 days iPhone battery replacement price will go | up by $20, not such a good deal anymore. I can buy a budget | phone at this price point. | jasoneckert wrote: | This is excellent. However, I wish they released a more powerful | version with the same repairability. I believe this would better | appeal to the audience that values the repairability, as well as | put pressure on other vendors to do the same. | BurningFrog wrote: | That seems like the natural progression, if this model has any | success. | jw14 wrote: | Supported with updates for 3 years? So you'll change the battery | once, I guess. | whatsthatabout wrote: | The Nokia website only states 2 years of OS updates - so its | e-waste from the beginning. What a joke *EDIT: And 3 years of | security updates | PufPufPuf wrote: | If it gets popular enough on XDA, you can bet on another few | years of updates from the community. | | - Sent from my Xiaomi A2 Lite (released 2018), currently | running Android 13 | throwaway4good wrote: | Can you install your own OS on this device? | Ninjinka wrote: | > "allowing users to swap out the battery in under five minutes" | | Wow, I remember when that was 5 seconds, and came standard on | Android. | LegitShady wrote: | they should raise the price $20 and give 5 years of updates. | | gsmarena says this g22 will have a 3.5mm headphone jack too. | [deleted] | shp0ngle wrote: | I never ordered Fairphone because honestly the camera is absolute | crap and making pictures of my kids is maybe #1 thing I do with | my phone. | | If the camera on these is less crap... I probably still won't buy | it, because it has the same 3 years update policy as most | Androids do. | | But hey I might think about it harder. | | edit: conversely, if fairphone ever ships with camera that's | better than 7 year old iPhone, then I'm game. | mvkel wrote: | Fine as long as the software will continue to support it, which | will last about two years | everdrive wrote: | This looks like a step in the right direction. If someone could | make it easy to get another OS on here, we'd really be in good | shape. | pxc wrote: | If you can't update it to fix security flaws, it's not | repairable. Software and firmware updates is 100% a repairability | issue, as is the ability to customize those things with your own | patches. | bboygravity wrote: | Uniherz Titan is also a fully repairable phone (came out years | ago). | | Also it's better because it has a physical keyboard :) Just IMO | obviously :) | | Recently got spare parts for mine such as battery and new charger | port circuit. The manufacturer posts Youtube videos online on how | to DIY it. Totally amazing IMO. | Groxx wrote: | Interesting brand - how's the OS customizations and security | update velocity? Those small phones are awfully tempting... | askvictor wrote: | I have a Jelly 2; the OS is mostly stock Android - a couple | of minor tweaks to support particular hardware (e.g. the | customisable button). | forinti wrote: | The thing I really cared about was being able to swap the | battery. So I got a Neffos C5 many years ago. When time came to | swap the battery, I could only find crappy ones (probably used) | from China. | | So, while I see this as positive, I'll just wait a few years | before I praise anybody. | tuetuopay wrote: | > It runs Android 12 and will be supported for three years of | monthly security updates and two major Android version upgrades. | | And that's why I stick to iPhones for long-lasting devices, those | two major versions are a joke. Apple has the crown with _seven_ | on the iPhone 6S. When will someone make Android phones other | than Pixels with non-abysmal software support? Yes, I know you | can install alternate ROMs on your phone, but this is not what | the general public does, especially with a phone at this price | point. The average joe will definitely change his phone after | three years when they cannot install whatsapp or messenger or | their banking app anymore. | | That said, kudos to Nokia for entering this market, I genuinely | hope it will be profitable enough for them to keep it up! | amelius wrote: | Yes, I had to throw away my perfectly capable phone because my | banking app refused to work at some point because the version | of Android was too old and the phone stopped supporting newer | versions of Android. | | Edit: not sarcastic, 100% serious. | dzhiurgis wrote: | Can't you use web app tho? I only seen one bank that would | limit features on a web app (I don't understand why), but | there are tons of banks out there nowadays, many digital ones | with features where no traditional bank will ever even dream | to implement. | cvalka wrote: | Security updates are a must. Without them it's not a usable | device | amelius wrote: | The fault is not with the bank, but with the vendor of the | phone. The hardware is perfectly capable of running newer | Android versions, but the phone simply doesn't support | them. | Descensus wrote: | This is especially the case with lower end phones. My | mother (an immigrant whose family communicates via | WhatsApp, and other free services) buys a new phone every | year or so because her BoA, or transit app can't be used | without the version of Android that was never released | for her phone. | | It's some real "serpent eating its own tail" sh*t if I | ever saw it. | vbezhenar wrote: | Not everyone cares about security updates. | cvalka wrote: | Not everyone cares about using condoms for one night | stands. Would you apply the same approach to Windows | workstations? | vbezhenar wrote: | I, personally, do care. But I saw lots of computers with | old Windows, like XP, 2003 and so on. On my current work | we have dozens of customers with Windows Vista which | causes lots of headache and significantly limiting us | with development tools. Well, it works for them, so who | am I to judge. All I can see is that not everyone cares | about security updates, including Windows workstations | which handle quite important data. | nordsieck wrote: | > Not everyone cares about security updates. | | OK. | | But surely banks ought to. If you care about having a | banking app, then you ought to care transitively. | vbezhenar wrote: | Do they really? All they care is about some particular | version of Android (like any other app). I don't think I | ever saw any banking app which would check for presence | of some particular security updates (not even sure if | it's possible). | yjftsjthsd-h wrote: | Right, like the good old "we care so much about security | that we blocked rooted devices, but we make no effort | whatsoever to check the security patch date":) | serf wrote: | None of my banking apps will work on a rooted phone, so I | need to keep a 'clean' android phone around if I care to | use their app. (I don't.) | [deleted] | bmacho wrote: | AFAIK if I use a bank app on an insecure phone, and they | stole my money, the bank should give it back to me. | Authentication is their job after all. | | But it is not much of as a problem right now. They | definitely try to push people towards more secure and up- | to-date systems, but as now, you still can bank from | insecure systems as well, and allow your account to be | stolen. | aceazzameen wrote: | Banks don't even do 2FA properly. They don't care. | amelius wrote: | Banks don't care about security. See e.g. credit cards | where the numbers are just printed in plain sight for | everyone to copy them. | throwaway744678 wrote: | It's supposed to never leave your pocket or your hand. | Besides, if someone gets your credit card number and | purchases something, you can charge it back. The vendor | is supporting the risk, not you. | pxmpxm wrote: | > Security updates are a must. Without them it's not a | usable device | | That belongs on https://twitter.com/shituserstory | cvalka wrote: | Don't be arrogant and wrong at the same time. Not a very | good combination. | pxmpxm wrote: | As a _bank customer_ | | I want to _buy a new phone when trying to access to my | money_ | | So that _an IT manager at the bank can put a check mark | next to a policy OKR_ | aspyct wrote: | I suggest you complain to your bank about it. If you can, | maybe switch to another one if they don't fix the issue. | | I know it sounds extreme, but it's time to send the signal | that it's not ok to force people to throw electronics to | landfill because of shiny new APIs. | camhart wrote: | I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. | | I have 5+ year old Android phones that have no issue with | banking apps. I'm not sure where this rhetoric is coming | from, but it doesn't align with my experience on Android. | | Capital one/wells fargo requires android 8+. Citi bank 7.1+. | (I stopped looking it up at this point). 8 was released in | 2017. So assuming 2 years of major OS updates, that means | roughly phones from 2015 can still work with it. | | Also... even if the app stops working, you can use a web | browser still. | | Phone batteries die off long before this becomes a reality. | 8K832d7tNmiQ wrote: | 2017 and above android phones are generally considered to | be mature enough on both hardware and OS version side | compared to a decade-old phones released on 2015 and below. | | I would not surprise if we'd gradually get longer software | support on future phones as time goes on. | xnyan wrote: | >I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. | | My local bank requires 9 or above | | >Also... even if the app stops working, you can use a web | browser still. | | It's not uncommon at all for banks to have a website that's | virtually impossible to use on mobile browsers. | camhart wrote: | Even at 9, thats supported from devices bought in 2016 or | later. Who's battery lasts > 6-7 years? | benj111 wrote: | But why should the device life be limited by the battery? | | This thread is discussing a phone with replaceable | battery. For at least 5 years. | amelius wrote: | Yeah, using the website is cumbersome compared to using | the banking app, in my bank's case, especially on mobile. | Spooky23 wrote: | Can't carriers lock OS versions? I remember a long time ago | circa Android 4 I had to replace a bunch of deployed | devices because Verizon wouldn't allow upgrades. | bitbang wrote: | Chase now requires 9+ | AnonymousPlanet wrote: | If you're using a banking app to do online banking, security | doesn't seem to be a priority in the first place. Or what is | your banking app's second factor for authentication? | Fingerprint? On Android? On the same device you bring with | you everywhere and use for surfing all sorts of websites? | Zigurd wrote: | It's the oems fault in this case. And they have no excuse. | Google has modified the architecture of Android to make it | possible for oems to update as quickly as possible, as well as | all of the previous efforts to enable updating user-facing | features without updating the OS. But it's all still a kludge | compared to iOS. | | The bottom line is I don't think this is solvable with | technology. Google should have gotten much tougher with OEMs | once Android got widely accepted. | pjmlp wrote: | They had their chance with Project Treble, and took the | decision to make updates optional and not a requirement for | Play Store contracts, so naturally nothing changed. | | The Android team is the one to blame, several times on | Android Fireside sessions they have answered that they rather | have the fragementation of the ecosystem where partners are | allowed to experiment and come up with new ideas. | | Well one of the ideas is to sell newer devices instead of | free beer upgrades, with Google's complacency. | | I still rather be on Android, because even with them screwing | up Sun and leaving it to implode, I like that they push a | managed OS no matter what. | | Those that unaccept it and keep diving into the NDK with GL | based UIs, always get a few scars in the process. | duxup wrote: | I agree about it being impossible to solve the update issues | with tech. | | There are too many benefits for the OEMs to dump phones on | the market and not update. No reason to care otherwise so | far, sadly. | rock_artist wrote: | Also Pixels usually gets less official OS iterations than | iPhones. | | Only nice thing on Android is the aftermarket ROMs since it's | AOSP. Sadly from my experience the aftermarket ROMs for newer | OS iterations arent polished or miss features that the OEM roms | had. | camhart wrote: | Less official? | xnyan wrote: | They meant fewer, as in "Android gets fewer official OS | iterations than iPhone." | nortonham wrote: | what they mean is iPhones receive updates (OS upgrades and | security updates) and are officially supported by Apple for | a longer period of time than any Android phone. | | The Google Pixel receives new android versions and security | updates for a longer period of time than any other android | phone, but that's fewer than the equivalent iPhone | duxup wrote: | Yeah my wife's old iPhone 8 Plus still gets updates, still | runs. Many of my android devices from that time are dead, no | more updates, and/or borderline unusable due to random android | slowdown performance issues. | | In fact running across that old phone is what convinced me to | switch. | Moldoteck wrote: | Not to dismiss, but I have a pixel 3, still snappy, android | 12. It was released 1 year after iphone 8 if I'm not | mistaken, but still, it's about ~5 years from today | theshrike79 wrote: | Yep, that's the lifecycle of iPhones. | | I usually get the latest and greatest from work every 2 | years. Then I pay a nominal fee to get it for myself (because | of taxes or accounting or something). | | I get a new phone from the company, my old one goes to my SO. | Their old one goes either to my kid or to mine or my SO's | parents, depending on which part of the lifecycle they are | at. | | Can't do that with Android, the 5-6 year old ones would be so | bad and out of date that I wouldn't want to be the one doing | tech support for them. | y-c-o-m-b wrote: | > when they cannot install whatsapp or messenger or their | banking app anymore. | | Hyperbole much? That's a ridiculous claim. I've been sporting a | _" renewed"_ Samsung S10E since early 2021. There's still | nothing it can't do. Prior to that I owned a Galaxy S7 since | 2016! That's a 5 whole years without any phone issues on an | Android phone. I turned on the S7 a few months back and after | an update, all the apps still work. | fdaryfdyfgd wrote: | that's at least 3 years each using a phone with absolutely no | security updates to network, wifi, cryptolibs, html/js engine | etc. | | not that iphone are any better. you have zero idea what you | get on a new ios for old devices since the binaries are not | the same. only thing you can be certain is the extra slow | down loop | y-c-o-m-b wrote: | On the S7 I got security updates up until September 2020 | IIRC. I anticipate the S10E will continue to receive | security updates for just a little while longer and it's | currently on Android 12. | | My point was that old Android phones "not working" after a | few years is complete bs. The S10E was launched in March | 2019 and still going strong. | | EDIT: Looks like the S10E is still getting monthly security | updates too: | https://doc.samsungmobile.com/sm-g970f/xeo/doc.html | piperswe wrote: | The HTML/JS engine does get updated, it's contained in a | component called "Android System WebView" on the Play | Store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.go | ogle.and... | kyriakos wrote: | A big benefit of Android, its modular and bits and pieces | can be updated independently. Part of the reason iPhones | require to have long term OS support is the fact that | their browser would otherwise be stuck at an old version. | IshKebab wrote: | You have it backwards. In the early days Android didn't | have any components in the Play Store and Apple still | provided updates for much much longer than Android | manufacturers. | | Google moved the web browser component to the Play Store | _because_ Android 's OS updates are so bad. They had no | choice but to do it. | | Apple could do it too if they wanted to but they don't | need to because they actually provide OS updates for a | decent period. | kyriakos wrote: | Regardless of the history though, now, Chrome (+ webview) | and Firefox on Android receive at least one update per | month (sometimes more frequently). Thats a plus. | eganist wrote: | Samsung supports 4 years of updates as of last February. | The S10E is in that window, too. | | https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-android- | updates-114... | gandalfian wrote: | Though I'm on android 9? Five year old phone and while I'm not | a power user nothing seems to care? Apple apps are much more | picky of versions. | rhn_mk1 wrote: | Security is a complicated matter; you only realize you should | have cared when it's too late. | thrashh wrote: | What Apple apps? I just went from an iPhone 10 (6 years old) | to 14 last week and I didn't have any change in my apps. | b1ue64 wrote: | The difference here is that an iPhone X (damn, that came | out 6 years ago?) is still supported | throwaway472919 wrote: | I guess what they meant is that third-party apps are much | stricter on iOS (at least partly because Apple updates | faster and for longer, probably). I was on Android 8 (2017) | until recently without any issues, whereas iOS apps only | seem to support 1-2 versions back generally. Plus the | Safari rendering engine doesn't update independently so you | can't fall back to the web. | circuit10 wrote: | That's because the iPhone 10 is still being supported so | you likely have the latest iOS version | kyriakos wrote: | PS149.99 with 3 years of software updates + repairable sounds | good enough to me. | bg24 wrote: | I am an iPhone user. Irrespective of software update, the | device gets really slow at 3yrs mark, forcing me to change. So | I do not know if supporting a phone software for >3yrs is a | good idea or just marketing. | nabakin wrote: | Small to medium Android phone manufacturers need to team up and | support a single ROM instead of maintaining individual flavors | like this which only last for a few years. | therealasdf wrote: | Samsung offers 5 years of support. | paulryanrogers wrote: | Certain models and only starting last year. So an | improvement, yet still requires one do research. | pjmlp wrote: | iPhones drag to a crawl after a couple of OS updates when the | hardware is no longer up to the stuff of the latest iOS | versions. | | I only change phones when they die in some form, so 300 euros | every 5 years on average is more than enough, I am not buying | phones with laptop prices. | | I have anyway access to Apple devices via project assignments | in consulting projects. | mynameisvlad wrote: | So you'd prefer a phone that has no updates, functional or | security, to one that is _slower_? Because that's the reality | for functional updates after less than two years, and | security after 3 for this phone. 7 major OS updates is over | twice as long. | | Ok. Sure Jan. I think the majority will take that slow phone | in a heartbeat. | bmacho wrote: | Why not? A phone that has no updates, functional or | security still can do a lot of things very well. | mynameisvlad wrote: | It's also a _massive_ security risk. | flykespice wrote: | How often do you run into security riskd when using your | phone everyday? | serf wrote: | Would you know what to count? Most wouldn't. | mynameisvlad wrote: | Considering the increase of putting your entire life into | your phone, your phone's security should honestly be | among those you care about the most. | | Most people will access all facets of their life on their | phone, from social, to financial, to work. If anything, | the risk is only going to increase as time goes on. | dageshi wrote: | Given androids market share vs iphone... the majority are | indeed taking a phone with no updates over a slower phone. | | As long as the apps they use work ok I'm not sure the | majority cares about updates security or otherwise. | mynameisvlad wrote: | I mean, no. Their market share says nothing about | people's wants and needs on this topic, it just means | that on the whole the Android package is more appealing. | Which could be for _many_ reasons, of which price is | going to be the biggest. | | If people could choose a longer period of updates, I | don't really expect any to refuse. | dageshi wrote: | You don't get longer updates without increasing the | price. If people did really care about updates outside of | HN it would be a marketing feature. | mynameisvlad wrote: | The fact that Android phone releases (like the one we're | commenting on right now) generally announce the supported | feature and security updates indicates that it very much | is one already, at least on the Android side. | pjmlp wrote: | It is no different from how feature phones and smartphones | used to be. | | Only rich people care about iPhones, or those that buy | everything on credit. | mynameisvlad wrote: | Or, you know, those that want their phones supported for | longer than two years. | | Minimizing a group of people does nothing but stroke your | own ego. There are many reasons to buy an iPhone. There | are many reasons to buy an Android. Buying one or the | other says nothing about you as a person and implying | otherwise is absurd and childish. | | We're not on Reddit; this is supposed to be adults having | conversations not preteen fanboys blindly worshipping a | mobile OS. | pjmlp wrote: | Who is worshipping iOS here then? | mynameisvlad wrote: | Nobody. Did you even read the comment you replied to? The | one that says there are reasons to buy each OS? Pointing | out a clear advantage is not worshipping, it's just | _pointing out a clear advantage_. | | Price is a clear advantage for Android phones. Does that | make me an Android worshipper now? | system16 wrote: | My experience does not align with this at all. I've been | using an iPhone XS for nearly 5 years. Other than wishing it | had a more powerful camera, I haven't felt the need to get a | new phone at all. Sure, it's not as snappy as my wife's brand | new iPhone 14 Pro, but I can easily live with it for another | year or two. | qwytw wrote: | After a couple of OS updates any iPhone is still faster than | an average Android phone sold at the time. | eropple wrote: | _> iPhones drag to a crawl after a couple of OS updates when | the hardware is no longer up to the stuff of the latest iOS | versions._ | | Not really, and definitely not with more modern ones. I have | an iPhone 11 from 2019. It was released with iOS 13. It is | now running iOS 16.1.1. It is as snappy as the day I bought | it. I'm considering a phone upgrade, but that's because of | the improved camera, not performance (or even battery life). | | My old iPhone 8 (2017) is still getting updates, and now _is_ | moderately pokey with nontrivial apps, but the OS is fine. | And I get it with regards to apps, as the perf and battery | improvements between the A11 and the A13 chips was pretty | significant. | pjmlp wrote: | I wasn't talking about the modern ones, naturally they | still aren't old enough to suffer from that. | | As you tell yourself, the iPhone 8 isn't its former self | with its original iOS version. | eropple wrote: | It's also _six years old_ and where it 's pokey tends to | be _apps_ , not the OS. The browser, mostly. Turns out we | all like to write a lot of JavaScript, I guess? | | Even if that weren't the case, a six-year-old iPhone 8 | has out-survived the useful, secure life of, what, | _every_ Android device not made directly by Google? Hell, | a 3.5-year-old iPhone 11 has out-survived the useful, | secure life of the overwhelming majority of Android | devices, too. And, further, given that A11- >A13 was the | most significant period of perf improvement and energy | reductions (the A14/A15 are moderately faster but the | tail certainly appears to be here), that bodes well for | its continuing usefulness. | pjmlp wrote: | 80% of the world doesn't care about those performance | enhancements at the price of a laptop replacement. | | Apps or OS doesn't matter, they are interwined. | eropple wrote: | I have bad news for you about the performance of flagship | Android devices from 2017, man. | jstummbillig wrote: | > Not really, and definitely not with more modern ones. I | have an iPhone 11 from 2019. It was released with iOS 13. | It is now running iOS 16.1.1. It is as snappy as the day I | bought it. | | I mean.. that is (on average) roughly 2.5 years old. If | your phone was expensive and is still fairly new, then it's | not going to be affected by the stuff that pertains old, | mid-tier phones, before it gets even older than those. | | That's not an Apple/iPhone property but I find it | fascinating, that they are able to sell it as such. | eropple wrote: | I bought mine at release, to replace an iPhone 6 (which | itself replaced an Android device of higher spec because | I was tired of the treadmill and a friend sold it to me | used). So mine's closer to 3.5 years old than to 2.5. | | And when you slot that against Android options, 3.5 years | is a lot for a usable, secure life of a mobile device. I | can safely assume I'll get five years of good, secure | perf out of any Apple device from the last five years and | another 2-3 years (at minimum) of tolerable performance, | and that's pretty hard to argue with in this market. | | Don't get me wrong, it's not _enough_ and I 'd like it to | be better; I'd like _all_ hardware reusability to be | better. I 'm pretty big on it; I still have an iPad 3 and | a Nexus 7 in use as house kiosks (which sidesteps the | security issue that phones necessarily have). But if I am | maximizing useful life, buying Apple devices has been | less fraught for most, if not all, of my adult life. | irowe wrote: | I'm now to the point where I frequently have first party | apps crash on my iPhone 7, plus the screen has phantom | touch issues. I really don't want to replace it though. | thrashh wrote: | I was using an iPhone 10 with the latest iOS versions until | last week and didn't have any issues | pjmlp wrote: | Now try the same with an iPhone 5. | crazygringo wrote: | They really don't. | | IIRC, there was only one prominent case of that happening | (slowing down noticeably), I think it was iOS 7 on the iPhone | 4 but I might be wrong about that. And I think they fixed it | a bunch in 7.1, so it wasn't even for that long. | | But ever since then Apple really _hasn 't_ pushed updates | that slow the phone meaningfully. Instead they gatekeep new | features to newer models that can support it, which makes | sense. | tuetuopay wrote: | Well I'm happy to have a bit slower phone to be able to use | it fully for 7 years, with all security updates and current | apps (again, with their respective security updates). | | Did you actually daily drive one? Because I did use an iPhone | 6S for its full software support span (7 years) and yes, by | the end of 2022 it was definitely the fastest kid on the | block. But to run messaging apps, play music, grab quick | pictures and scroll memes in the subway, it's more than fine. | pjmlp wrote: | When doing projects on Apple ecosystem, yep. | ck2 wrote: | It will likely be running LineageOS (formerly Cyanogenmod) for | a decade to come. | secondcoming wrote: | My current Nokia phone has 3 years of support | input_sh wrote: | Fairphone that's mentioned in the article has 7 years of | support (IIRC). | | Never used it though, my last 3 phones were all from Nokia. | It's pretty much the only manufacturer that still releases new | stock (Android One) models regularly. | | (Excluding too-expensive-for-my-taste Pixels and some Motorolas | I could never find in my country). | justsomehnguy wrote: | > and some Motorolas I could never find in my country | | Hm? Writing this on g30 and Motos aren't popular here for | years. | | Edit: like I bought the cheapest Samsung last year and the | experience is night and day. | w4rh4wk5 wrote: | Does it have a headphone jack? | haunter wrote: | Yes | jonas-w wrote: | yes it does | | https://www.nokia.com/phones/nokia-g-22/specs | WhackyIdeas wrote: | I have an iPhone Pro Max 13, and you can mark my words - I am | selling this and getting a couple of these G22's. This sounds | fantastic. I cannot wait. | hajola wrote: | Curious, what is the reason you would consider buying more than | 1? | Nextgrid wrote: | Spare parts? | tastysandwich wrote: | > It runs Android 12 and will be supported for three years of | monthly security updates and two major Android version upgrades. | | They couldn't get Android 13 in time? Seeing as it's already a | major version behind, and 14 will be released in August 2023, | you're really only getting another six months of software support | (plus security fixes). | | I'm not an Android dev but my understanding is that a lot of work | has been put into making Android easier to upgrade major versions | (eg, core functionality being split out into separate services). | It doesn't look like that is translating into longer upgrade | support, which is a shame. But I suppose that's why we're getting | 5 years of security updates? (which is probably most important) | Groxx wrote: | Given how much of an absolute mess 12 was for me on a Pixel | phone, and the massive delays and pushback from other | manufacturers, I would kinda have hoped they would use 11 or | jump to 13. | | 12 was easily the least stable Android I've ever used, and | that's _including_ three years of constant beta (sometimes | nightly) use while I did Android development. | cristiioan wrote: | Outside the major brands(Samsung, etc), many cheap phones ship | with an older version from release. Probably because it is | cheaper? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-02-25 23:00 UTC)