[HN Gopher] Masonry Heaters: 18-24 hours of heat output from a s...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Masonry Heaters: 18-24 hours of heat output from a single wood fire
        
       Author : gjsman-1000
       Score  : 26 points
       Date   : 2023-02-25 18:57 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.mha-net.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.mha-net.org)
        
       | macmac wrote:
       | Malwarebytes flags this site as having a Trojan.
        
         | gjsman-1000 wrote:
         | Well, then it's wrong.
         | 
         | https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/3d43fe6f2a5b96525b5b76817...
        
         | sp332 wrote:
         | It's also blocked by Plume routers, but it's not categorized as
         | anything specific.
        
         | devwastaken wrote:
         | 3rd party AV is useless in modern computing. Ublock origin and
         | knowing your file extensions is a significantly better
         | solution.
        
       | skybrian wrote:
       | The electric version of this is called "electric thermal storage"
       | where the electric heater is used off-peak to heat up ceramic
       | bricks. It seems unlikely to beat a heat pump, though. Could they
       | be combined?
        
       | world2vec wrote:
       | My parents have a fire stove like those ones in their house,
       | built almost 30 years ago. Not a common design in the country
       | they live but apparently it is in Switzerland where they worked
       | for many years before. Very efficient indeed.
        
         | Dma54rhs wrote:
         | This is also common and very old tech in all the colder
         | countries in Eastern Europe but obviously electricity has taken
         | over. I'm even a bit surprised because I'm having a hard time
         | thinking how else would you hear your house but probably it's
         | enough in milder climates to not store the energy like that.
        
       | thriftwy wrote:
       | Did they just invent a Russian stove?
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_stove
       | 
       | Now when the end game is known, perhaps it is better to just
       | adopt the existing designs instead of trying to perfect the
       | current product.
        
       | twawaaay wrote:
       | I built one with my father when I was a kid.
       | 
       | It was dual purpose cooking range and a huge mass of bricks for
       | heat capacity. It was built at the spot where multiple walls met
       | in the centre of the house to increase mass of bricks in contact
       | and to heat multiple adjacent rooms. The walls in those rooms
       | would typically be too hot to touch.
       | 
       | One weakness of our setup was that it would suck the air out of
       | the house through the night. Another was that complex internal
       | tunnels made the maintenance difficult.
       | 
       | If I built one today I would make sure to fix it and create a
       | sort of heat exchanger for coming air.
        
       | ghaff wrote:
       | It's an interesting idea although I assume it has to be somewhat
       | baked into new house/addition construction.
       | 
       | A big downside of conventional wood stoves I find is that, if I'm
       | not going to be hanging out at home--mostly around where the fire
       | is--for the day it's not really worth it a lot of the time. I
       | fire up my wood stove mostly when it's especially cold and I'm
       | not primarily working in my office.
        
       | pjkundert wrote:
       | If you want a lot of background on designing and building an
       | effective "rocket stove" (the core of a masonry heater), you'll
       | enjoy this:
       | 
       | https://batchrocket.eu/en/building
        
       | mmastrac wrote:
       | I vaguely recall seeing a YouTube video about some folks living
       | in Siberia and using these to keep their homes warm.
        
       | fwlr wrote:
       | You have to follow a few links to get to a definition of what
       | masonry heaters actually are, but it ends up at https://www.mha-
       | net.org/docs/def-mha.htm
       | 
       | Specifically the important parts: "a mass of at least 800 kg.
       | (1760 lbs.)", "an overall average wall thickness not exceeding
       | 250 mm (10 in.)", "external surface of the masonry heater ...
       | does not exceed 110 C. (230 F.)", "at least one 180 degree change
       | in flow direction" of the released gas.
       | 
       | Essentially, it's a rocket stove and a large thermal mass of
       | masonry, and the masonry has a few design restrictions to meet
       | certain performance characteristics (i.e. it should absorb most
       | of the heat released by the stove and it shouldn't release that
       | heat too quickly from any particular point on the mass). Mostly
       | I'm surprised it's that easy; I would have thought anything that
       | can radiate heat slowly and consistently would by necessity also
       | absorb heat slowly and consistently, making it difficult to
       | capture most of the heat from a fast-burning stove.
        
         | a9h74j wrote:
         | > I would have thought anything that can radiate heat slowly
         | and consistently would by necessity also absorb heat slowly and
         | consistently
         | 
         | Something like a ratio of flame-side heat absorption at flame
         | temperatures, to room-side emissivity at room-side
         | temperatures(wavelengths)?? This could fall out from material
         | properties without appearing as an explicit design detail (e.g.
         | a surface treatment).
        
         | bcbrown wrote:
         | > Mostly I'm surprised it's that easy; I would have thought
         | anything that can radiate heat slowly and consistently would by
         | necessity also absorb heat slowly and consistently, making it
         | difficult to capture most of the heat from a fast-burning
         | stove.
         | 
         | My understanding is that this is the motivating principle for
         | the "bell" part of the stove. The hot exhaust from the
         | combustion chamber is piped into a massively larger enclosed
         | airspace, which has an exhaust port at the very bottom. Since
         | hot air rises and cool air falls, most of the heat in the
         | exhaust will be absorbed by the bell enclosure before finally
         | being vented through the exhaust port. By enclosing the bell in
         | masonry, it meets the design restrictions you mention.
         | 
         | I think it's also possible to build a masonry heater without
         | using rocket stove principles, just a fireplace with a huge
         | mass of masonry surrounding it. In that case, you'd want
         | cladding with somewhat high thermal conductivity to capture the
         | exhaust heat, but it's thick enough that the solution to the
         | Fourier heat equation [0] is low enough to meet the design
         | restrictions.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_equation#Heat_flow_in_a_u...
        
         | Tcepsa wrote:
         | TL;DR different modes of thermal transfer can transfer heat at
         | different rates.
         | 
         | There are a couple factors at play that help it absorb heat
         | faster: 1) Convection rather than radiation. As the hot gasses
         | travel through they stove they are in contact with the mass and
         | can transfer heat more directly to it, which then spreads
         | through the mass via conduction. This is aided by... 2)
         | Newton's Law of Heating and Cooling, which basically says "the
         | greater the temperature difference, the faster the heat
         | transfer". Since the gasses from the combustion are around 1000
         | degrees or higher (at least initially) they transfer heat much
         | faster to the mass (several hundred degrees delta) than the
         | mass transfers it to the room temperature air (one or two
         | hundred degrees delta).
         | 
         | Similarly, much of the radiation of the hot inner mass is
         | absorbed by other parts of the hot inner mass; only the parts
         | near the outside actually radiate heat away from the mass.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-02-25 23:00 UTC)