[HN Gopher] 90% of Kidnappings in Sao Paulo result from dates on... ___________________________________________________________________ 90% of Kidnappings in Sao Paulo result from dates on Tinder and similar apps Author : laurex Score : 127 points Date : 2023-03-01 19:47 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (restofworld.org) (TXT) w3m dump (restofworld.org) | mrkramer wrote: | For example dating app can require background security check in | order to register and use the app. Sounds like a good business | idea. Somebody do it....I have other ideas that I work on. | gowld wrote: | They do. https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/13/match-expands- | tinders-free... | sn0wf1re wrote: | Wouldn't that just lead to a false sense of security? Surely | the background check would not be 100% at preventing bad | actors. | danrocks wrote: | Worse: may lead to liability as well. "but Tinder said it was | secure due to bg checks!" | gowld wrote: | You mean like they already do? | https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/13/match-expands-tinders- | free... | honkler wrote: | [flagged] | standardUser wrote: | The General Social Survey found that "the portion of Americans | 18 to 29 reporting no sex in the past year more than doubled | between 2008 and 2018, to 23 percent." | | https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-ame... | honkler wrote: | 23% in 2018. It was about ~35% or so in 2022 IIRC. | | And then you have to also factor in that men tend to lie a | bit on these surveys. | | Also factor in that it's only asking if they got laid in the | past 1 year. Do it 6 months, and the figure shoots way up. | IMHO, the time gap should be no more than a month or so. That | would define real incels. 1 year is way too much. | skyyler wrote: | "Real incels are people that haven't had sex for a month" | | What do you mean by this? | honkler wrote: | That men who want sex, but cannot have it for a period of | month should be counted as incels regardless of whether | they think they are incels or not. | | People seek divorce if their spouse isn't having sex with | them for a month. I am applying that same heuristic to | inceldom. | standardUser wrote: | That's insane nonsense. | standardUser wrote: | > "If I am 51 and she is 23, how can I not think I am being | catfished for a possible robbery?" | | The man makes a fair point. Personally, I don't go on a date | unless I am convinced this person and I have some things in | common and would actually have a good time hanging out. If one | party is worried, they can ask for a phone call/video chat or to | exchange social media. I have a feeling many men are far less | discerning and are simply "swiping right" on everyone and then | engage with any of the resulting "matches" that give them the | time of day. | InCityDreams wrote: | >many men are far less discerning and are simply "swiping | right" on everyone and then engage with any of the resulting | "matches" | | Hey, _customers_ - see how the app company is allowing you to | be treated? | expertentipp wrote: | > I don't go on a date unless I am convinced this person and I | have some things in common and would actually have a good time | hanging out. If one party is worried, they can ask for a phone | call/video chat or to exchange social media. | | In a balanced environment this would work. Dating, apartment | rental, and job search markets notoriously aren't balanced | environments. | | > men are far less discerning and are simply "swiping right" on | everyone and then engage with any of the resulting "matches" | that give them the time of day. | | This here is the reality. It doesn't matter what you want and | feel. | gowld wrote: | Why would every prostitute be a robber? If this is happening, | it's a failure of law enforcement and sociery. | | I matched someone 1 year younger than me. I was catfished for a | robbery -- she got my house, my money, and my kids. | expertentipp wrote: | Male profiles have negative value for dating apps, so it's better | for a man to ignore fishy profiles than to report them with any | negative feedback and risk a nuclear ban. Can we shred the Match | group into pieces, please? | kansface wrote: | It seems like it would be trivially easy for the Police to set up | stings. | standardUser wrote: | Sure, and instead of wasting billions every year busting low- | level drug dealers our governments could be going after spousal | abusers and date-rapists and setting up stings for sexual | assaults in high-crime areas. You know, crimes with actual | victims. | | But preventing violence against women has always been among the | lowest priorities for law enforcement. So naturally, sexual | violence against men, which is far rarer, is even farther off | the radar. But of course we gotta stop those pesky drugs users | and small-time peddlers at any cost! | [deleted] | iepathos wrote: | Everything seems trivial when you trivialize the problem. Sao | Paulo has an extremely high crime and violence rate aside from | any dating app kidnappings. The city and country's problems | extend far beyond dating apps and redirecting resources from | other violent crimes to "stinging" all the bad actors on dating | apps won't magically solve things for them or even reduce their | overall violent crimes with their resources shifted. They've no | doubt already caught multiple people performing these kinds of | kidnappings, but it's just a drop in the bucket. | 8f2ab37a-ed6c wrote: | Out of all the dating apps Tinder has done the absolute bare | minimum to ensure the safety of its members. | | The number of active fake profiles on there in large metropolitan | areas is mind boggling. They've known this for years and done | absolutely nothing to address it. I imagine it would affect the | numbers significantly. I have completely given up on the app | given the % of fake users who are there to take advantage of | someone's loneliness. | coupdejarnac wrote: | I'd wager that Match has contracted out the creation and | maintenance of fake accounts. | technion wrote: | I'm fairly convinced if tinder actually killed fake profiles it | would go bankrupt. Not in terms of total user count, but in | terms of female user count. | | It's already basically a meme to talk about the horrible m/f | ratio. The number floating around of 20% female doesn't take | into account the high population of "don't respond to messages | here, if you're hot hmu on my OF" profiles, which is about one | in four profiles here. | | But moreover the number of crypto scammers is extremely high. | At one point I had like eight reading the same script to me on | the same day. And tinder actually makes it so you can't report | them, seemingly going out of its way to protect this revenue | stream. | yosito wrote: | From the headline, I assumed that this was men kidnapping women. | But it is actually men being baited by profiles of women an | kidnapped or robbed. This is also quite common in Colombia. I | heard a story of a Dutch guy who met a very eager woman from | Tinder. She drugged his drink, and he ended up naked with no | belongings at the bottom of a well. Somehow managed to escape | alive. | InCityDreams wrote: | >I heard a story of a... | | Sauce? | whymauri wrote: | Not the same story, but it's covered frequently in Colombian | national and local news. Here is an example: | | https://ktla.com/news/local-news/a-cruel-and-senseless- | crime... | | The highest risk cities are Medellin (high expat population) | and Cartagena (high tourist population). No matter how much I | tell my friends not to use Tinder in Latin America, they | still try and end up in close calls. One friend ended up in a | 'Millionaire's Ride' extortioned to buy overpriced cocaine. | jfengel wrote: | And it sounds like men in Sao Paulo need to start doing what | women have been doing since the beginning of dating: always | letting somebody know where they are, always meeting first in a | public place, never taking a drink from anybody except a | bartender. | | For men elsewhere, it's really good for them to know that women | do this, and that this is why. You may know that you're not the | man who does that, but they don't, and the consequences can be | worse than losing your wallet. Practically every woman knows a | woman who has been assaulted this way. Understanding that will | help you plan your dates accordingly so that she can feel a lot | more comfortable, and you'll both have a much better time. | hcarvalhoalves wrote: | The reason this happens with men is what the article doesn't | mention: most/all the victims are married men cheating on | their partners. So, they arrange dates on empty or far away | places, late night and don't communicate where they're going. | RajT88 wrote: | Yeah, I mean, if you think about it - they're the best | targets. Least likely to go to the police afterward. | [deleted] | notch898a wrote: | Married men are also probably the richest marriage+sex | classification. I can't imagine catfishing a bunch of | single 18 - 22 year olds that dominates dating apps is | super profitable. | elzbardico wrote: | Just out of curiousity, where did you get this data from? | could you share the link? | LanceH wrote: | Comment about the victims being male. Response about how men | can change their behavior for women. | majormajor wrote: | This advice is given all the damn time. You've never seen | an article about how to be safe on blind dates or such? A | quick google search turns up several. | | Is it that _women 's problems are invisible to you until | men start having some of them_? | elil17 wrote: | Obviously no one should have to be so careful. We should | aspire to have a society where all people are safe from | crime. But this is the reality of the world right now, and | it is helpful to suggest that men take a page from women's | playbooks when it comes to personal safety. | jfengel wrote: | You're absolutely right. Just as we should be teaching boys | not to assault women, we should be teaching girls not to | drug and rob men. | | That doesn't seem to be as big a problem yet, but we should | nip it in the bud before it spreads beyond Sao Paulo. Every | parent should teach their daughters that robbing men is | wrong. Just as every parent should be teaching their sons | that raping women is wrong. | | There is no excuse. Whether he's wearing a Rolex, or she's | wearing a miniskirt, that's their choice to make. It is not | an invitation, and you are not entitled to anything. | | Rape is a crime, and robbery is a crime. We should | prosecute both, and make sure our children get the message | that it is unacceptable. | | I appreciate your reminder that the criminal, not the | victim, is to blame. It's unfortunate that people do have | to protect themselves, but I hadn't intended my advice to | suggest that that's the only change we should make. We | already have laws and must enforce them. | callmetom wrote: | [dead] | gowld wrote: | Oh, we forgot to tell criminals to not be criminal. What | a silly overight. | jfengel wrote: | Unfortunately, this is a real problem for women. A lot of | boys get the impression that women are "teasing" them and | "deserve" to be assaulted. Every woman who files rape | charges knows that she's going to have her sexual history | questioned, and be asked what she was wearing, as if that | made a difference to the legality. | | You wouldn't think that "No means no" is a lesson we'd | have to teach, but not only do we have to, but a lot of | people will push back on it. | | So I'm being a bit facetious in my reply, but I'm using | the opportunity of the OP's self-pity to reiterate: this | is a thing that women go through all the time. | epicureanideal wrote: | > A lot of boys get the impression that women are | "teasing" them and "deserve" to be assaulted. | | I don't know which alternate universe you might be | observing, but in this universe that is simply not true. | pelasaco wrote: | don't forget the every woman is a robber in potential /s | sn0wf1re wrote: | The response is how to take basic steps to protect one's | self. Steps that are already common among women. Basic | safety steps are not victim blaming, for example, wearing | bright clothing at night to reduce the chance of being | injured by motor vehicle. | | It seems you are implying that the comment is victim | blaming, or if I take your statement less charitably it is | flame bait implying that the comment above would cause | outrage if the genders were swapped. | LanceH wrote: | > Understanding that will help you plan your dates | accordingly so that she can feel a lot more comfortable, | and you'll both have a much better time. | | All the points were valid, but when people talk about the | invisibility of male victims...this is it. | saagarjha wrote: | This advice is literally exactly what every woman is | told. It has nothing to do with male victims. | luckylion wrote: | > Basic safety steps are not victim blaming | | I agree, but it's 100% called victim blaming when you | apply it to women. "We shouldn't have to do anything | differently", "teach men not to rape" etc etc. | | I don't think anyone here disagrees, they're pointing out | the double standard. | vkou wrote: | Whether a statement is victim-blaming or not depends on | the _purpose_ behind it. | | If the purpose behind it is to give helpful, relevant, | _useful_ advice for avoiding a bad situation, it 's not | victim blaming. | | If the purpose behind it is to downplay and deflect and | ignore the _other_ causes of the bad situation, it is. | | If someone isn't wearing a seatbelt, and dies in an auto | accident, it's not victim blaming to remind people to | wear seatbelts. It is victim blaming to use that reminder | to divert attention away from the fact that the auto | accident was caused by another drunk driver. | SoftTalker wrote: | Either way, you're dead. Why is it wrong to point out | things that could have been done to avoid that outcome? | jfengel wrote: | Honestly, my purpose was neither. This is, thus far, a | localized matter, and it's unlikely to affect most men. | The advice is sound, but that's not really the purpose. | (And it was very much not intended to blame them.) | | Rather, my purpose was to use the opportunity to give men | perspective about women. And it's something they can use | to their benefit: not to avoid being robbed, but to have | more successful dates. | skyyler wrote: | But women already get that advice of meeting in public / | telling friends... If this is some kind of "gotcha", I | think you're doing it wrong. | luckylion wrote: | Go give women that advice, see what happens. | | Again, it's solid advice. But you'll get torn apart if | you publicly give "be safe first, be right second" advice | to women. | JohnFen wrote: | You don't need to give that advice to women. They've | already gotten it, almost certainly from other women. | | Given how women are often treated by men, I totally | understand why they would chafe at being given this sort | of advice from a man. I would, too, if I were in their | shoes. | | Apparently there are a lot of men who haven't received | this advice from anyone, though, even though it always | applied to them as well. | RajT88 wrote: | > But you'll get torn apart if you publicly give "be safe | first, be right second" advice to women. | | Because it's patronizing to think they don't know that. | dustingetz wrote: | "thirst trap" | goldfeld wrote: | Yes, it seems the title is using "dates" only to attract | eyeballs, even "matches" would be better here. | thriftwy wrote: | In St. Petersburg, Russia, there was reportedly a restaurant | where a fake date would invite men and then quote them exorbitant | sum (order of magnitude higher than expected) for food and drink. | | All the profits, none of the risks of criminal persecution. | | Russian has a slang word, _dynamo_ , for the attractive women who | date without romantic interest just to get dined & maybe some | presents, and then bail out. | numbers_guy wrote: | Apparently that is common in many tourist traps, not only in | Russia. | luckylion wrote: | I've seen it as "get into a seedy bar, have women chat you up | and ask whether they can join you for a drink, get presented | a huge bill", but women going on dating apps to get men to | the bars is a different level. It makes sense obviously, | digitalization doesn't stop at scams. | myth_drannon wrote: | It's very common scam and not only in Russia. A woman splits | the profits with the restaurant that charges the naive Western | tourists 10x of normal bill(actually it can be without a woman | trap involvment). The same can happen with a clothing store. | Some guys can spend like $1000 on woman's clothes which she | promptly returns and gets part of her share. Heck even on Greek | islands, many clubs had attractive ladies on payrol to get the | guys in and buy drinks. | thriftwy wrote: | I don't believe they targeted foreign tourists specifically, | rather than local dudes from Tinder. | gowld wrote: | Tourists are much easier marks for these scams. Locals | know, have less money, and more local support. | Tijdreiziger wrote: | I have heard variations of this scam in other places around the | world. I think it's sadly a somewhat common scam. | | Either a fake date or someone in front of the cafe or bar leads | you in. You have a few drinks and are subsequently presented | with an outrageous bill, and a few burly men have appeared out | of nowhere preventing you from leaving. Police don't really | care since you're just a foreigner. | | Abroad in Japan (a great YouTube channel about Japan) recently | made a good video on the topic: https://youtu.be/NeZUOFKOUeI | seanmcdirmid wrote: | That is a very common scam in China. If the girl you just met | is too good to be true, ya, you are going to get scammed. | velavar wrote: | This is good advice but I fear it's only a matter of time | before scammers realize this and turn up as dates that are | quite believable similar to your average Joe/Jane. | thriftwy wrote: | Maybe they don't want that. They don't want you as The | Reasonable Guy show up and react upon all the warning signs | and be a nuisance. | | What they want is to have extra careless, out-of-touch guys | to filter themselves in by responding to somewhat | questionable profile. | mysterydip wrote: | Reminds me of how scammers will intentionally use bad | grammar/spelling in emails to filter out "low conversion | rate" prospects. | yibg wrote: | Similar to the tea house scams in China. Targets mostly | tourists at popular sites. | monksy wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clip_joint | expertentipp wrote: | I wondered the origin such places in Poland, that's how they | arrived! Meanwhile it's mafia covered by local police and | politicians, importing the best capitalist practices. Prague | in Czechia is also notorious for these kind of places. | hugocbp wrote: | Just a couple of notes: | | Pix is not an app but a platform (like INTERAC in Canada). It | works with most banks and most people with bank account now have | it. | | Not only that, it is not just a QR app. You can send money to any | key, that can be: | | - An email | | - CPF (unique SIN / SSN number that in Brazil is not considered | secret) | | - Telephone number | | - Randomly generated key | | The transactions are also, for the most part, instantaneous | (think 1-2 seconds) and irreversible (as far as I know). | | Even if you only have in your phone apps for banks without a Pix | key, it is trivial and fast to create one. Unfortunately the only | way out of this is to never have on your phone a bank app (and | they can even force you to download one on the spot if you are | actually kidnapped). | | Also, from someone who was carjacked in the past in Brazil: this | has always happened here. I think it is simply the delivery | method that is changing. Unfortunately, ban those apps and the | bad guys will just go back to randomly kidnapping / carjacking | people on the streets of rich neighbourhoods like they did in the | past. | drukenemo wrote: | Agree with your comments, but as a Brazilian too, I feel the | need to emphasize that although this kind of thing happens, | it's not that high of a risk that it will happen to you. I'm | from Rio and personally don't know anybody who has suffered | such crime. I felt like adding this comment because "this has | always happened here" could be interpreted as "this happens all | the time to a lot of people". | hugocbp wrote: | I think that the risk part is relative. | | I've been robbed 8 times in 30 years in Brazil. From having | my watch stolen at 14 by someone with a broken glass to the | carjack I talked about previously. My family and close | friends, for the most part, have been robbed, kidnapped or | carjacked 0 times. | | It is a numbers game. I, unfortunately, have been on the | unlucky side. It is one of the main reasons I left for | Canada. | | So while I do agree that is not something that happens every | day to your circle of known people, it does happen more often | than it should even if you are not on the high crime zones. | | And I'm not even from Rio or the most dangerous cities, I'm | from Belo Horizonte which, for Brazilian standards, is | actually considered more on the safer side for bigger cities. | notch898a wrote: | People in South America where all the criminals have guns | should definitely not research the FGC-9 which might give | them some chance of ending up in jail instead of dead when | the violent criminal approaches. | wbl wrote: | Do they not have Reg E and KYC in Brazil? Seems like taking a | ransom by electronic payment should lead to very fast arrest | when you try to move the money from that account. | InCityDreams wrote: | [flagged] | [deleted] | potatototoo99 wrote: | Jesus Christ. | the-smug-one wrote: | You're on HN. You're probably rich relative to the would-be | robbers in Brazil. | hugocbp wrote: | Just to be clear: not everyone on the streets of a rich | neighbourhood is rich. This is just where they go to try to | commit those crimes. | | Actually some of those bad guys get so frustrated when they | end up snatching someone that is not rich that they often | physically hurt them or worst. | | So your comment is very out of place. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-01 23:00 UTC)