[HN Gopher] Vitamin D supplementation and incident dementia ___________________________________________________________________ Vitamin D supplementation and incident dementia Author : bookofjoe Score : 46 points Date : 2023-03-03 17:51 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com) (TXT) w3m dump (alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com) | underdeserver wrote: | I dove deep into Vitamin D supplementation research during Covid. | The tl;dr as I understand it - and bear in mind I'm a layperson | in this - is that while Vitamin D deficiency correlates to many | bad things, taking Vitamin D doesn't help _. It does raise your | level as it shows up in blood tests, but the bad things still | happen. | | _ Except for some very specific issues. | | I have a mild deficiency and used to take Vitamin D. I stopped | taking it after consulting with a doctor on the meaning of the | VITAL study results [1]. I also recommend [2], from a practicing | surgeon who deals with Vitamin D related medical issues in | patients. | | [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35939577/ [2] | https://www.devaboone.com/post/vitamin-d-part-3-the-evidence | steelframe wrote: | Thank you for this. I've heard that it's not so much the | Vitamin D itself that may be beneficial, but rather the process | whereby Vitamin D gets produced that results in the benefits. | | The tapestry of cells in our bodies has evolved over millions | of years to function in a way that is most favorable to | propagating themselves in the context of the environment in | which they underwent natural selection. It seems we've removed | ourselves from that environment in a lot of ways and then have | been trying to compensate for that by micro-managing telemetry | that we're able to easily or cheaply observe. However the | underlying complexity is far, far beyond what we see as the end | result of the cellular processes. | waboremo wrote: | >while Vitamin D deficiency correlates to many bad things, | taking Vitamin D doesn't help. | | Your links state the exact opposite and it's important to get | wording right here. If you have a tested vitamin D deficiency | (and it's not "mild", as Deva Boone highlights), there are | CLEAR benefits to supplementing. | | It's only in _healthy_ individuals where the benefits are tiny | (like the cancer testing 0.9% v 1.2%) or non-existent. | red-iron-pine wrote: | This is a very neutral headline. But for the tl;dr crowd: | | > Across all formulations, vitamin D exposure was associated with | significantly longer dementia-free survival and lower dementia | incidence rate than no exposure (hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% | confidence interval: 0.55-0.65). The effect of vitamin D on | incidence rate differed significantly across the strata of sex, | cognitive status, and APOE e4 status. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | You can get your APOE e4 status, which is a marker for | Alzheimer's and dementia, from any DNA test like 23AndMe. To | protect your privacy: use a fake name, new email address, and | get a temporary UPS Store mailbox address for the kit to be | mailed to. Use a Visa gift card for payment. Yes, it can be | done and it works. | floxy wrote: | >To protect your privacy... | | You can't really expect too much privacy with a DNA type | test, right? Since it knows all of your relatives who have | also taken the test. | netfortius wrote: | I've been taking 1000 IUs daily, for the last 20 years, skipping | summers (during which I would attempt sun exposure), while | continuously being within acceptable medians for my age. I sure | hope what I am typing now makes sense :-) | cypherpunks01 wrote: | Any chance you have an identical twin who has not? | fshbbdssbbgdd wrote: | Like all studies into Vitamin D supplementation that aren't | randomized controlled trials, it's very hard to tell apart cause | and effect. Vitamin D naturally occurs when people go outside and | get exposed to the sun, and going outside is correlated with all | sorts of healthy traits. Also, publicity of the association of | vitamin D with good health has led people who care about their | health or who have access to good medical care to supplement | vitamin D. Studies that look at the health of people who choose | to supplement vitamin D are examining the overall health of those | people and can't specifically measure the effects of the vitamin | D supplementation. That's one of the problems randomized | controlled trials are designed to solve. | | The study mentions these limitations: | | > Considering that sun exposure is the most important natural | source of vitamin D, the lack of information on participant-level | exposure to sunlight can be considered another limitation of the | present study. | | > While we included education in our models, the NACC dataset has | a dearth of information related to SES and therefore, SES | differences could not be accounted for in our study. Future | studies using cohorts with more comprehensive data on SES and | other social factors would certainly provide valuable information | on the associations of SES with exposure to supplementation and | risk of dementia. | | For what it's worth, controlling for a variable like education | can only partially remove related bias from a result (you don't | have a perfect measure of how a person decided to take vitamin | D). | rogers18445 wrote: | When evolution molds a genepool it does so with inbuilt | assumptions, one the assumptions is exposure to some level of | sunlight. Deviating from these assumptions would result in | undefined behavior (in the CS sense) for individuals. | | If an individual cannot or will not expose themselves to | sunlight, taking D3 is probably the best option they have. | fshbbdssbbgdd wrote: | In my opinion, these are the best options if you want to be | healthy like people who get sun exposure (in order from most | to least likely to work): | | 1. Act like a person who is exposed to sunlight. | | 2. Expose yourself to sunlight. | | 3. Supplement vitamin D. | CharlesW wrote: | Hey people who follow the science: As an "indoor human", how much | should I be taking? (TIA!) | sanman811 wrote: | I wouldn't say I have followed the science but my doc | prescribed 2000 IUs daily and it definitely makes a noticeable | difference in a gloomy winter | greenyoda wrote: | What kind of a difference have you noticed? I also take 2000 | IUs, but I haven't noticed any significant difference in how | I feel since I've started taking it. | nicoburns wrote: | How are feeling generally? It's possible you didn't have a | deficiency to start with. I went from being completely | depressed, barely able to get out of bed to mostly | functional (although still not quite as chirpy as I am in | summer) when I started taking a vit d supplement in winter. | torial wrote: | you might want to check on your Vitamin D receptivity. For | example, I took a DNA test, and it indicated my Vitamin D | receptors weren't as efficient as normal so I should take | higher doses than other people. | jacobriis wrote: | Up to 4,000 IU is generally recognized as safe. If you take a | multivitamin, there is some in that that you should subtract. | | https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/how-much-vita... | beardface wrote: | I would advise taking a K2 MK7 supplement with D3, or get a | supplement that contains both. Personally, I take one capsule a | day that contains both 3000IU of D3 and 100mg of K2 MK7. | | D3 by itself can cause high calcium levels, to the point of | toxicity in very high doses. The K2 moves the calcium from the | blood to bones. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | I take LifeExtension K2 MK7. It's quite inexpensive and | LifeExtension is reputable brand. | gumby wrote: | > Personally, I take one capsule a day that contains both | 3000IU of D3 | | Not sure how much D3 you're getting (though starting with 3K | IU is a lot) because it's not clear how much gets through the | gut. You might want to take some cod liver oil (O3 capsules) | at the same time -- the fat is believed to improve the still | mysterious absorption process. | | Typical dosage is a drop of cholecalciferol suspension under | the tongue for direct absorption. | underdeserver wrote: | Talk to your doctor. Probably nothing. See my root-level | comment. | pazimzadeh wrote: | First get tested to see how deficient you are. I was prescribed | 50,000 IU a week for 8 weeks because I have 12 ng/mL. Standard | range is 30 to 80 ng/mL. | GoToRO wrote: | Not science person but I took some and I was too sleepy, all | day. Also there are about 4-5 hours until it promotes the | production of melatonin and so you have to time it right. Also | it is fat soluble, you need to take it with your (fat?) meal. | patrulek wrote: | Something between 2k-10k should be fine. | troydavis wrote: | Test your current level, ideally in the winter or early spring. | If it's low or low-normal[1], start with 2000 IU/day. Wait 6-9 | months, test again. If it's still low, increase to 4000 IU/day. | | The comments on this submission have more: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34634977#34635562 | | [1] If it's really low, see a doctor | sebow wrote: | Some might not like this answer but the best course of action | is still some sun exposure. As for the actual answer, someone | correct me if I'm wrong but there there are multiple 'variants' | of vit. D and the vast majority of "vit D" supplements most | likely don't include the complete formula (which is arguably | the best way in order to also assimilate it "fully"). The daily | recommended dose is fine unless you're deficient. | poxrud wrote: | There are places where it is impossible to get the | recommended amount of sun exposure, even if you were to spend | most of your day outside. | voldacar wrote: | If you are truly an indoor human, start with 10k iu daily and | possibly titrate up from there based on bloodwork. Absorption | can differ significantly between individuals | mistrial9 wrote: | test first, supplement with test results | spacephysics wrote: | I'll try to get 15-30 min of sun exposure without sun screen in | the warmer months each day. Feel immensely better during then, to | a point where I've seriously considered moving somewhere warmer | without real winter months. | encryptluks2 wrote: | [dead] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-03 23:00 UTC)