[HN Gopher] Taiwan is a vital island that is under serious threat ___________________________________________________________________ Taiwan is a vital island that is under serious threat Author : Michelangelo11 Score : 78 points Date : 2023-03-06 21:35 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.economist.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.economist.com) | marcusverus wrote: | https://archive.is/OdlIr | aseerdbnarng wrote: | While the Chinese threat to Taiwan is not something to be | dismissed completely, the article doesn't mention just how | incredibly vulnerable China is to possible sanctions targeting | their food supply. China imports most of its food and as their | farmland is quite poor, its hugely dependent on fertiliser to | feed itself. Sanctions targeting these basics would be | devastating so I really struggle to see a convincing case for the | CCP risking national suicide and its own existence over Taiwan | ninethirty wrote: | If China does invade, then it seems likely that North Korea would | also invade SK, forcing the US to fight on at least 2-fronts, or | 3 depending on what Russia is doing. If I was rich I'd move to | Buenos Aires, the Paris of South America, and wait this thing | out. | it_citizen wrote: | I am curious what the dominant opinion is in China regarding what | the population of Taiwan wants. | | That the majority of Taiwanese want to become Chinese? | | That it doesn't matter what the Taiwan population wants because | China has the right to claim it? | bena wrote: | The dominant opinion of the people of China or of the | government of China? | | I would say that the majority of the people of China are much | like the majority of the people of any land, they don't | directly care about the issue. Someone on the other side of the | country in Karamay probably doesn't even think about Taiwan for | most of their days. | | However, according to the government of China, Taiwan is an | island occupied by a rogue government, the last remnants of the | losing side of a Civil War. That island is part of China. | | The people of Taiwan have different opinions. Three major ones | last I looked. There's the opinion of the natives who think | Taiwan should be its own country, independent of any other | country's influence. Control of the area has alternated between | China and Japan. With China getting control back in 1945 after | WWII. | | Then there's the people who believe that the ROC should be | reinstated on the mainland. | | And finally, some people who think they should just become | members of the PRC and get all over with. | NicoJuicy wrote: | The dominant population ( Han) in China is not the majority. | | It's > 100 million people putting a leash on the rest. | yrdmb wrote: | If there was ever a doubt that the economist was propaganda... | | > Taiwan is a democracy, so its future lies in its people's | hands. | | Ukraine was a democracy and the UK, EU and etc ousted their | democratically elected president. Same goes for bolivia, | venezuela, iran, russia, etc. The confederacy was a democracy | also. Does the economist believe the confederacy's future should | have lied in the southerners' hands? | | The democracies around the world are not being threatened by | china. They are mostly threatened, attacked and undermined by the | EU, NATO and the US. | | > But that makes it vulnerable to authoritarian exploitation. | | Says the propaganda outlet trying to influence and exploit | taiwanese people. | | How about letting the chinese people in mainland china and taiwan | decide the matter for themselves. Oh wait, they already did. Why | are the entire western propaganda system so intent on starting a | war between china and taiwan? If the economist is so keen on | "freedom", maybe they should pray for the liberation of japan, | korea, philippines and much of the pacific islands from | occupation by non-asian and non-pacific nations. | gruez wrote: | What exactly are you argue here? That because Taiwan is a | democracy, newspapers can't write articles about what they | should do? That Taiwan's people doesn't want to prepare for | conflict? | stale2002 wrote: | > How about letting the chinese people in mainland china and | taiwan decide the matter for themselves. | | Taiwan currently has decided for themselves that they are happy | to accept military weapons from the US, to defend themselves in | the case of any military action against them from China. | | If that is Taiwan's decision, they should be supported and | allowed to make it. | gman83 wrote: | Yanukovych was removed from office by Ukraine's parliament: | https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/192030.html | yogthos wrote: | The elephant in the room is that Taiwan is a Chinese province and | Taiwan's legal standing is not in question [1]. This is the | position held by the UN, and it's the fundamental basis for | having diplomatic relations between US and China per Potsdam | Proclamation [2] that was signed 77 years ago between China, the | US & the UK. This position has never officially changed. And | here's what US State Department says on their official page [3]: | The United States approach to Taiwan has remained consistent | across decades and administrations. The United States has | a longstanding one China policy**, which is guided by the Taiwan | Relations Act, the three U.S.-China Joint Communiques, | and the Six Assurances. We oppose any unilateral changes | to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan | independence; and we expect cross-Strait differences to | be resolved by peaceful means. | | [1] https://thediplomat.com/2014/08/no-taiwans-status-is-not- | unc... | | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potsdam_Declaration | | [3] https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-taiwan/ | unethical_ban wrote: | What is your point? | yogthos wrote: | What part of my comment is unclear to you? | jmclnx wrote: | All they need to do is look at what happened in Hong Kong. | | If China did not do what they did in Hong Kong, Taiwan may be | headed to some kind on unification. Now, they would be crazy to | even entertain that thought. | | This issue lies directly on China and no one else. If I had a say | in Taiwan, I would announce it is now a independent Country. | pphysch wrote: | What happened in Hong Kong? I thought the violent riots were | long gone. | gumby wrote: | The CCP abandoned their promises of a democratic system and | controlled the legislature, then more recently cracked down | on speech, protest, and anything different from mainland | practice. | | HK had had no democracy under the British, but unclassified | documents have since shown that that was at the demand of the | Chinese government who threatened to invade if HK was allowed | to vote. | bena wrote: | When Hong Kong was ceded back to China, they were promised a | certain level of autonomy for a certain amount of years. | After a few years, China realized they didn't have to keep | their word and have been rapidly taking more direct control | of the area than initially promised. | epolanski wrote: | Hong Kong was leased to Britain till 1997. Very different case. | | As for Taiwan, if they declared independence it will be an act | of war. | | Don't forget that US protects Taiwan on the basis it does not | declare itself a sovereign country. | | Also, don't forget this is the official map of the Republic of | China (Taiwan): | | https://i.redd.it/jbyegko5mkc21.jpg | dwohnitmok wrote: | The Taiwanese concept of "unification" is not what you're | thinking of. | | The Taiwanese faction supporting unification (usually the KMT) | does not envision a world where Taiwan is/becomes a province of | the PRC, they envision a world where the ROC governs all | current PRC provinces, that is where they are in the seat of | power in Beijing. I.e. this is something going in the opposite | direction. | | The opposing faction rejects these ambitions and wants Taiwan | to go its own way. | | EDIT: Since it's not necessarily military intervention. | ozmodiar wrote: | I've never heard this take, even while in Taiwan. They aren't | deluded, they know they aren't retaking the mainland. The | reason they don't declare themselves a country is because | China won't support it and they're worried it would trigger | an invasion. China prefers Taiwan be a rebellious province | rather than an independent country because it strengthens | China's claim to the island. The KMT used to be feeling out a | HK like integration with China but I think that's even more | dead than it used to be. | adastra22 wrote: | That was Taiwanese politics in the 90's. It doesn't reflect | current party policy. | dwohnitmok wrote: | As far as I'm aware this is still the official party line | of the KMT. | | It's just that now the DPP (their opposition) is in power. | Aperocky wrote: | > I would announce it is now a independent Country. | | I am disappointed to see HN devolve into armchair general | territory. In this specific case, the constitution ruling over | Taiwan is the Constitution of Republic of China adopted in 1946 | in Nanjing, before the PRC was a thing. | | In general most of Taiwan does not believe it needs to do | anything to "proclaim" their independence, only a tiny minority | want to change the constitution (not just an amendment, the | name of the constitution itself), which would be rather | difficult on almost all levels.. | yogthos wrote: | Perhaps China should start funding a secession movement in | Texas and proclaim it an independent country. | edrxty wrote: | If any state is being propagandized into secession it's | Florida right now. | | They, however, find themselves in a race with mother nature | to see who will remove them from the continental US first. | yogthos wrote: | The point here is that this is the equivalent of what US is | doing, and something US would never tolerate itself. Just | imagine for a second if China set up equivalent of NED and | USAID, started funding political campaigns in Texas or | Florida, and so on. This is what US is currently doing. | | US is blatantly interfering in Chinese internal politics | and violating Chinese sovereignty while acting as if US has | some god given right to meddle in other countries. It's | absolutely surreal. | dirtyid wrote: | >Taiwan may be headed to some kind on unification | | TW sunflower movement killed peaceful unifcation long before HK | drama. Generation rift inevitable. Reality going forward is | Taiwan is going to have to look at HK or UKR and decide if they | want to be just another Chinese city or glassed island that | will never recover. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | Hong Kong was seized by a colonial interloper. Why would China | take orders from someone who took their land? | wk_end wrote: | It wasn't about "taking orders", and it had nothing to do | with the British. The CCP broke promises they'd made to the | people of Hong Kong. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | Promises made to appease the British as a condition for the | handover. | simplotek wrote: | > Promises made to appease the British as a condition for | the handover. | | Care to explain what point you believe you are making? | pshirshov wrote: | Maybe because they've signed an agreement? | simplotek wrote: | > Hong Kong was seized by a colonial interloper. Why would | China take orders from someone who took their land? | | The British Empire precedes and was multiple times longer | than PRC's rule of mainland China. If you're wanting to play | the legitimacy game, by your own measuring stick the UK still | has more legitimacy over the rule of HK than the PRC. | itake wrote: | > All they need to do is look at what happened in Hong Kong. | | Maybe I am diving too much into the weeds here, but my | understanding with HK is when the UK left and setup autonomous | region with China in 1984, China/UK agree to leave the gov | unchanged for 50 years after 1997 [0]. This interim government | that was setup is controlled by CCP members. | | My understanding is the Taiwan gov has always been completely | separate from HK's. | | [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino- | British_Joint_Declaration | anonkogudhyfhhf wrote: | Taiwan govt ruled China and lost to the Communists in the | civil war. Both countries see Taiwan as part of a greater | China | foobarian wrote: | It's a governmental net-split! | mulmen wrote: | Taiwan has no relationship to HK. | | My understanding as an outsider: | | Taiwan's is governed by the Republic of China (ROC), which | regained control of Taiwan in 1945 after the Japanese pulled | out. ROC was overthrown my Mao's Chinese Communist Party | (CCP) during the Chinese Civil War and lost control of the | Chinese mainland allowing the CCP to form the People's | Republic of China (PRC). The ROC retained control of Taiwan. | Taiwan has always been independent from the PRC and CCP. | | This completely ignores the actual native Taiwanese people | who may or may not consider themselves Chinese. That is a | topic I can't even begin to comment on. | | The takeaway from HK in the context of Taiwan is that the | People's Republic of China did not hold up their end of the | bargain with the UK in HK so there is no reason to trust them | in any agreement of "reunification" in Taiwan if the terms | are anything other than complete submission to PRC rule. | simplotek wrote: | > (...) the People's Republic of China did not hold up | their end of the bargain with the UK in HK so there is no | reason to trust them in any agreement of "reunification" in | Taiwan if the terms are anything other than complete | submission to PRC rule. | | This. PRC's talk of "reunification" reads like a trojan | horse played with a long hand which was what happened in | HK. | Animats wrote: | If there is a war, it will not be a short, victorious one. It | will mean the destruction of cities in both Taiwan and mainland | China. | | Russia has the advantage with Ukraine that there are no major | Russian population or industrial centers in range of Ukraine. | That's not true of China and Taiwan. | questime wrote: | "Voice module online. Audio functionality test initialized. | Designation: Liberty Prime. Mission: the liberation of Taiwan. | Primary Targets: any and all Red Chinese invaders. Emergency | Communist Acquisition Directive: immediate self destruct. Better | dead, than Red." | steponlego wrote: | It may be time to recognize that the one China policy which the | US has supported has essentially doomed Taiwan. Sure we had some | laughs and a lot of people made many billions of dollars off the | backs of Chinese slaves, but there is no resisting the PRC's | power and might - power and might that the United States, or more | accurately a clique of business people and government | functionaries here, have nurtured. | mupuff1234 wrote: | Probably a completely idiotic suggestion, but why can't the US | secretly provide Taiwan with a few nukes if things really heat | up? | steponlego wrote: | China would provide us with a few if we did that. Actually I | believe the nukes are coming soon but thankfully will be | limited to Europe and the UK. | cm2187 wrote: | What would be idiotic is to do that secretly. The whole point | of nukes is that the enemy (and its public opinion) knows you | have them and intend to use them if necessary. | mupuff1234 wrote: | Taiwan will reveal them at the very last moment when war is | imminent. | | If war is still preventable showing the nukes will just | escalate things. | RajT88 wrote: | We periodically park Aircraft carriers there to de-escalate | PRC activity. | | I am sure we have provided them some weapons. Not sure | conventional or nuclear. | mulmen wrote: | We also sell (give?) them a lot of weapons. The Taiwanese | air force is largely comprised of US airframes. | krisoft wrote: | > Taiwan will reveal them at the very last moment when war | is imminent. | | Ok, they reveal them. What is next? Nukes are not magic. | They are just weapons. What do you think would happen once | they are "revealed"? | | What delivery mechanism are you proposing? Should they be | aimed counter-force or counter-value? (Meaning are they | trying to shoot the chinese nuclear launchers or are they | lobbing them into chinese cities?) How are you protecting | the nukes in Taiwan? | mupuff1234 wrote: | You detonate one over open waters and tell China to back | down. | | If they do, problem solved. If they don't, it probably | didn't hurt. | stale2002 wrote: | Well, the biggest reason is that Taiwan already has domestic | nuclear refinement capabilities and likely could make a nuke | themselves in a couples months if they needed to. | | They don't need to do that quite yet though, as despite the | media panic, an invasion of Taiwan is years, is not decades | away from being attempted. | | China is a real threat, but it's more over the long term, than | any immediate concerns. | mjfl wrote: | most of the (mainland) Chinese students I talk to tell me | that they believe an invasion will happen 'sooner than | later'. | pphysch wrote: | That worked out fantastic in 1962. | krisoft wrote: | To quote Dr. Strangelove: "Of course, the whole point of a | Doomsday Machine is lost, if you _keep_ it a _secret_!" | | What do you think would be the point of Taiwan having secret | nukes? What would they do with them? | | Or for that matter non-secret nukes? | dirtyid wrote: | Because historically nukes haven't deterred PRC who fought / | skirmished / confronted with every nuclear state, USSR | (border), USA (Korea), UK (HK threats), India (skirmishes), | France (proxy in Vietnam), a few of those even when PRC wasn't | a nuclear state it self. All over sovereignty / security | interests much less important than TW. It's actually stupid how | willing PRC is not deterred by nukes. PRC will treat TW | slinging US sanctioned nukes same as US nuclear use. | cm2187 wrote: | What I don't get is that to invade Taiwan, China needs a large | amount of ships and cargo planes, both of which seem very | vulnerable to modern missiles (as the Russian army found out in | Ukraine). Do the chinese have a solution for that? | pphysch wrote: | The only reason PRC would invade Taiwan is if Washington | started installing ICBM silos there. In which case they would | just knock out that infrastructure with long-range strikes. | cm2187 wrote: | Taiwan is only 200km away from mainland china. You don't need | ICBM. | amelius wrote: | They are more difficult to intercept, though. | missedthecue wrote: | A naval blockade with sea mines and submarines. Taiwan imports | 70% of its food and 100% of its fossil fuels. | | Taiwan has major political factions that already favor closer | ties with China. Put under stress, Taiwan may be more inclined | to reunify than most western spectators would like to assume. | cm2187 wrote: | Historically, public opinions tend to unite against | adversity. If the aim is to gain the public opinions it would | be counterproductive. I think the support for Russia in the | Ukrainian public opinion is pretty much gone now. | throw1234651234 wrote: | Systems firing missiles are also vulnerable to missiles. That's | not a sarcastic response, with maybe the exception of very | short-range stuff - Javelin, Konkurs, etc. Those would be | vulnerable to thermal smoke counter-measures too. | anonkogudhyfhhf wrote: | Honestly Taiwan should go nuclear. It might be there only | solution | asah wrote: | Assuming they haven't secretly done this somehow, I assume | the only reason is that Western powers have forbade it (i.e. | made non-proliferation a requirement of their support). | richardw wrote: | * * * ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-06 23:00 UTC)