[HN Gopher] Silvergate Bank to Begin Voluntary Liquidation
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Silvergate Bank to Begin Voluntary Liquidation
        
       Author : pg_bot
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2023-03-08 21:38 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (dfpi.ca.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (dfpi.ca.gov)
        
       | LatteLazy wrote:
       | This is a real pity.
        
         | madballster wrote:
         | Why - unless you're being sarcastic? Looks to me like the
         | system is working Early warning system pushed the bank to
         | unwind positions before hurting depositors. Regulation appears
         | to be working well, for once.
        
         | elkos wrote:
         | How so?
        
           | Scoundreller wrote:
           | My guess is the loss of a crypto on/off-ramp in USA.
        
       | dzdt wrote:
       | Good context by Matt Levine a few days ago [1]. Basically
       | Silvergate did a lot of business with crypto firms and got burned
       | not by crypto speculation but just by holding long maturity safe
       | assets when too many of their customers wanted to withdraw money
       | on a short term basis. The result was falling below the line of
       | being "well capitalised" as a bank. Bank regulation seems to be
       | working here: there is no indication of wrongdoing or losses to
       | depositors...
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-03-02/silver...
        
         | rkagerer wrote:
         | [1] https://archive.is/yH1A5
        
         | londons_explore wrote:
         | > holding long maturity safe assets
         | 
         | I thought banks were able to sell those long maturity assets
         | for cash to another bank or investor to avoid exactly that kind
         | of situation?
         | 
         | And my understanding is banks must meet their regulatory
         | requirements overnight each night, so there is a market for
         | overnight loans/swaps/etc to make sure thats the case.
        
           | dragontamer wrote:
           | > I thought banks were able to sell those long maturity
           | assets for cash to another bank or investor to avoid exactly
           | that kind of situation?
           | 
           | Those assets dropped in value by like 20% last year. Check
           | out the stock ticker "TLT", which tracks 20+ year treasuries
           | to see just how bad it was, zoom out to 1-year or 2-years.
        
             | Octokiddie wrote:
             | That TLT story is being severely under-reported.
        
         | yieldcrv wrote:
         | Matt Levine is a good example of how writing cynically about
         | crypto matters makes you wind up correcting crypto adversaries
         | so much that you wind up coming across as a crypto proponent,
         | simply from being able to opine accurately on what's going on.
        
       | colesantiago wrote:
       | Good. This should destroy more confidence in crypto if it hasn't
       | already.
       | 
       | Now that the crypto hype has pretty much died, there isn't any
       | need for anything crypto at all.
       | 
       | A completely irrelevant and speculative industry which has no
       | legit usecase other than losing people's money, the only thing
       | that crypto is good at.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | Web3 wants to have a word /s
        
       | the_mitsuhiko wrote:
       | Necessary context: Silvergate Bank was a major (by crypto
       | standards) bank underpinning crypto companies.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvergate_Bank
        
         | rippercushions wrote:
         | More to the point, Silvergate was one of exactly two banks
         | serving crypto companies in the US. The other, Signature Bank,
         | is also under a lot of regulatory pressure and it has already
         | cut off eg. Binance and Kraken.
        
           | yieldcrv wrote:
           | There will be other banks and onramps. There was a time
           | before those two banks. And there are many more institutions
           | open to the business now.
        
         | Aloha wrote:
         | Yeah, I was going off to link something similar. I was lost as
         | to relevance.
         | 
         | https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/08/silvergate-shutting-down-ope...
        
       | elektor wrote:
       | It's interesting to see how quickly the public interest (and
       | money!) has shifted from cryptocurrency to AI.
        
         | AceJohnny2 wrote:
         | Heh, cstross even has a "conspiracy" theory about that sudden
         | shift:
         | 
         | https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2023/02/place-y...
         | 
         | (Which I don't buy)
        
           | cloudking wrote:
           | It takes about 5 minutes playing with ChatGPT to realize it
           | has real value, seems like author hasn't really tried it.
        
           | elkos wrote:
           | There are some pretty interesting ideas there. I had a
           | conversation with a friend the other day and the whole
           | blockchain then, AI now thing reminded me of a saying about
           | shelling "Picks and Shovels during a Gold Rush". I think it
           | is intriguing that GPUs are the "picks and shovels" of both
           | the Blockchain Rush and the AI Rush. One could point out
           | conspiracies and PR, another could point out that the as GPUs
           | become more general compute tools, new applications will
           | emerge.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | It sounds more hip than "gotta go buy some lotto"
        
         | koolba wrote:
         | 5+% US treasuries can quickly shift the calculus for USD
         | holdings. And lack of "real" money in the system cascades
         | quickly.
        
           | dragontamer wrote:
           | Given all the economic data + extremely hawkish comments from
           | Powell yesterday/today, it looks like we're going even higher
           | than expected this year.
           | 
           | FFR futures are expecting a +0.50% increase for the March
           | 22nd meeting.
        
           | ForHackernews wrote:
           | As they say, it's only once the tide goes out that you
           | discover who's been swimming naked.
        
         | ForHackernews wrote:
         | I mean, one of them has millions of users and is poised to
         | revolutionize the entire digital economy (and perhaps the non-
         | digital one as well) and the other one is electronic chuck-E-
         | cheeze tokens older than the first iphone and still useless.
        
           | Rebelgecko wrote:
           | I love how (unintentionally?) ambiguous your comment is.
           | 
           | Crypto bros and LLM bros both monetize via tokens
        
           | bink wrote:
           | I wish I could agree with you, but there's a lot of smoke and
           | mirrors with "AI" right now. These companies are letting
           | people believe these services are thinking machines that are
           | on the verge of consciousness when they are far from it.
        
             | jkubicek wrote:
             | There's some people making outsized and unreasonable claims
             | about AI today, sure, but AI is generally useful and
             | valuable right this minute. Crypto never really made it
             | over that hump.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-03-08 23:00 UTC)