[HN Gopher] Growing crops under solar panels ___________________________________________________________________ Growing crops under solar panels Author : lxm Score : 48 points Date : 2023-03-10 20:45 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.fastcompany.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.fastcompany.com) | throwuwu wrote: | I'm no farmer but wouldn't putting a whole bunch of stuff in a | field make it difficult to drive a tractor through it? Like have | you seen the size of modern tractors? These panels will need to | be 20ft in the air with support posts really far apart to | accommodate seed drills and sprayers and other equipment that the | tractor pulls behind it. | [deleted] | nhumrich wrote: | Yes, I think a single picture of a farm setup this way would | have increased the value of this article quite a bit. | yazaddaruvala wrote: | This[0] is a berry farm I was just at. As you can see it's | already covered to protect from extra sun. No tractor could | fit anyways. | | This[1] is one version of agrovoltaics. The solar panels act | like window blinds. They can be configured to follow the sun | but also can be configured to "provide optimal shade/cooling | throughout the day". | | [0] https://images.app.goo.gl/mSbtJjtSQRukBQqK6 | | [1] https://images.app.goo.gl/9kakPW8uRHLGp3yJA | tstrimple wrote: | Most of the examples I've seen are small scale hand pick | farming. But there is nothing about 20' spans that are outside | our technical abilities today. This seems like a rather small | obstacle to overcome. Of course this still says nothing about | the economic feasibility or impacts. | | Thinking more about it, you wouldn't even need 20' spans. You'd | have articulating struts coming off of a central point between | the rows. Panels can be adjusted out of the way of equipment | when it needs to pass through if it is interfering. | fencepost wrote: | To some extent that falls into the category of "fiddly | details." Solar panels are probably not the best choice for use | alongside bulk harvested crops like corn, wheat, soybeans and | even potatoes, but an awful lot of "produce" crops are | harvested by hand. | | The reason I say "fiddly details" is because questions like | "what's the best spacing between rows of panels" and "do I | plant under the panels or just between rows" can be decided as | people look into available equipment, land prices, crop | variation and flexibility, etc. | Jiro wrote: | Outside of weird edge cases (like mushrooms), how does this work | when the plants use the sunlight and so do the solar panels? | martyvis wrote: | There are plenty of places in the garden around my home that | either are always shaded or are only in full sun for a few | hours a day. Yet there isn't one spot (except under my house) | where nothing grows. Suitable spacing, height and angle of | panels (which could adjust during the day) and choice of crop | all would come into the mix of what would work. | crooked-v wrote: | I really don't get why people keep coming up with all these | elaborate plans to mix solar panels with other stuff that's in | active use, instead of just putting fields of them out in non- | endangered desert elevated enough off the ground that they won't | actively interfere with local animals. | pornel wrote: | Long-distance energy transmission may be technically or | politically harder, or just someone else's problem. | | If you're a farmer and already own the land, that's what you | can do. A combination of the two land uses might be more | profitable or less financially volatile than either one alone. | thethethethe wrote: | Why would we destroy pristine desert, which is rapidly | disappearing, when we could cover land that has already been | disturbed, like parking lots, building roofs, and farmland? | Deserts are important ecosystems regardless of their immediate | utility to industrial society | debacle wrote: | This idea is being pushed hard right now. I see it everywhere. | | You can't grow most crops under solar panels. And the crops you | can grow will probably have a lower yield. | | This is an idea that's meant to push replacing farmland with | solar arrays. I don't necessarily think that's a bad idea for low | yield soils, but in my area they are trying to replace high-yield | soils (former orchards, vineyards, market gardens) with solar | arrays. It doesn't make sense. | | What would make sense is arrays that are semi-portable that can | be used for re-establishing topsoil. With the right crops, good | topsoil can be reestablished in as little as 5-10 years. | jandrese wrote: | I think the idea is to use this on the handful of crops that | prefer the shade. Think small artisanal alfalfa farms with | minimal mechanization. | | But all in all I agree that it adds considerable complication | for little gain. At least in the US we are in zero danger of | installing so many solar panels that there is not enough acres | left for food. That kind of concern is orders of magnitude away | from reality. Especially if you start displacing corn-for- | ethanol acres with solar panels used to charge electric | vehicles. In that case you actually increase the available | acreage for food crops because the solar panels are so much | more efficient than corn ethanol. | fencepost wrote: | Not just alfalfa, but crops where what's eaten is the stems, | leaves and other parts of the plant more than the | fruits/seeds. Leafy greens, some root vegetables both starchy | and wet, asparagus, some brassicas, etc. Not nearly as broad | a list as full sun, but I'm also sure there are a lot of | things being grown in southern California now that needed a | lot of breeding to deal with as much sun as they get there. | yazaddaruvala wrote: | I just added this comment below: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35101717 | | A lot of farming NEEDs sun protection for better yields. | Currently farms that don't have sun protection over compensate | by over watering (also could reduce yields). | | Not to say every farm should have solar panels but it's very | likely a double digit percentage of farm land would benefit | from agrovoltaics. | cwkoss wrote: | I'd imagine a significant majority of mass-produced lettuce | is grown with some sort of shading to prevent bolting. | eloff wrote: | Exactly. This idea is so dumb, it reminds me of solar powered | roads or solar power on the roof of your car. | | There's no shortage of land out there that can't be used for | agriculture. The American southwest is full of empty land that | just happens to be very sunny. There's no need to comprise the | productivity of farms and solar farms alike to try and squeeze | them into the same space. Wind turbines on the other hand can | work beats they don't get in the way as much, especially on | grazing land. | nicoburns wrote: | > There's no shortage of land out there that can't be used | for agriculture. The American southwest... | | Maybe not in the US, but in more populated parts of the world | there very much is a shortage of land of any kind. | martyvis wrote: | The article says that having crops under panels might help | them through cooling. Options are worth investigating if it | makes the whole system more viable. | fencepost wrote: | There are plenty of crops that grow well in or even prefer | partially shaded conditions, particularly if there's a | significant amount of reflected light as well as there likely | would be around a solar array. | hahamrfunnyguy wrote: | True, however I think the point is to put more shade tolerant | crops under the panels. A lot of the crops we grow are not | grown directly for human consumption. | | Consider the corn grown for the production of ethanol: why not | just harvest the energy directly with solar panels there and | grow lettuce or carrots? It would be good to explore other uses | for the space as well, like using the panels as shade or cover | for livestock. | eulenteufel wrote: | The website blocked my IP from reading the article because it | found my uMatrix suspicious. Just tell me to disable it or deny | access to the site. No need to lock out people who like to decide | where their computer connects to. That is a bit petty. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-10 23:00 UTC)