[HN Gopher] Credit Unions ___________________________________________________________________ Credit Unions Author : delf Score : 84 points Date : 2023-03-12 19:03 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org) (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org) | causality0 wrote: | I exclusively use a credit union, but frankly I could not tell | you whether it's more or less vulnerable to market instability or | bank runs than a larger bank. It might be more stable for the | sheer fact of being very local and nobody around here really | cares what's going on in big cities or in silicon valley. | hummus_bae wrote: | [dead] | andrepd wrote: | I remember reading credit unions were significantly less likely | to go bankrupt than banks during the 2008 meltdown. In fact: | | > From 2008 through 2012, 481 FDIC insured banks were either | liquidated or merged with healthier institutions. Credit | unions, on the other hand, saw 136 involuntary liquidations or | assisted mergers at the hands of the National Credit Union | Share Insurance Fund (their version of the FDIC), among 6,940 | FDIC institutions compared to 6,815 U.S. credit unions. | UncleOxidant wrote: | > It might be more stable for the sheer fact of being very | local | | Being very local (and concentrated on one sector) didn't help | SVB. Most credit unions require (or used to) you to be in some | industry or union, etc to join. Like teacher's credit unions, | etc. So potentially there would be sector exposure. But I think | in recent years most CUs have relaxed those requirements (I | know the one I'm in did) and allow pretty much anyone to join. | Scoundreller wrote: | Usually the key words you're looking for here are "open-bond" | (open to all, but sometimes still geographical restrictions) | vs. "closed-bond" (ethnicity, occupation, religion) | AH4oFVbPT4f8 wrote: | I would think if a bank if FDIC and you have less than 250k | there, you would be fine. | latchkey wrote: | Not FDIC insured is a big one. | binarymax wrote: | This is not necessarily true, there are over 7000 federally | insured credit unions in the USA. | | Credit unions are required to maintain coverage for all | deposit liabilities. | | So it can't be undone by a bank run, but potentially could be | undone by theft if uninsured. | readthenotes1 wrote: | "Credit unions are required to maintain coverage for all | deposit liabilities." | | So are banks. | | What fraction of total deposits must be held in cash? | jcrawfordor wrote: | Credit unions are subject to essentially the same | capitalization requirements as banks---they're regulated | by NCUA, but NCUA's capitalization requirements are | largely harmonized with those of other bank regulators. | It's important to understand that banks themselves are | not all regulated by the same agency, with bank | regulation split between FDIC, OCC, and the FRS depending | on the bank (this is mostly unrelated to FDIC insurance | which applies to depository financial institutions | regulated by OCC and the FRS as well). These different | regulators all apply somewhat different supervision | methodologies, with the result that banks do indeed "shop | around" for a regulator that they feel will work the best | as a long-term relationship. But the overall | capitalization ratio requirements are mostly the same at | 7-10% being well-capitalized depending on calculation | method. | | But this discussion is more about insurance, not capital | reserves. Credit unions are required to hold insurance | (coverage) on their deposits just like banks, with the | same cap of $250,000 per account. Most, but not all, | credit unions are insured by NCUA, backed by the US | government. All federally chartered credit unions are | insured by NCUA, but state-chartered credit unions are | not necessarily required to be. The majority of state- | chartered credit unions are also insured by NCUA, but | they have the option of obtaining their insurance by | other means, and some choose to use private insurers like | American Share Insurance. These private insurers are | usually backed by a huge reinsurer and so the risk of | them not meeting their obligations is low, but arguably | higher than NCUA. On the flipside, private share insurers | sometimes offer higher coverage limits than NCUA. It's | mostly a minor issue though as credit unions covered by | other than NCUA are uncommon, and NCUA-insured credit | unions prominently post the NCUA logo. Similarly, non- | NCUA credit unions are required to disclose their | insurer. | | Federally-chartered credit unions usually use "Federal" | in their name although some don't use it in their general | advertising and logotype any more. State-chartered credit | unions only exist in some states, but California charters | credit unions and as you'd imagine there are quite a few | examples in that state. There are even "dual-chartered" | credit unions in some states that hold charters from both | state and federal governments. This is the norm in e.g. | Washington due to some banking regulation history. Older | credit unions are more likely to be state-chartered as | the federal system is newer than most state systems, but | credit unions didn't really take off until the Federal | Credit Union Act so there's still not that many of them. | pdonis wrote: | FDIC insurance just means that, if a bank fails, the | government will make depositors whole up to a certain amount | --printing the money to do so if necessary. NCUA provides | exactly the same guarantee to credit union depositors. I see | no reason to be any less confident in the NCUA guarantee than | the FDIC guarantee; ultimately both are subject to the same | risk, that the government will not be politically capable of | either raising or printing enough money to make depositors | whole in the event of a major financial crash. | UncleOxidant wrote: | _The National Credit Union Administration is a US government | agency that regulates and supervises credit unions. They also | operate and manage the National Credit Union Share Insurance | Fund (NCUSIF), which provides share insurance coverage for | credit union members against losses should the credit union | fail. The NCUSIF provides all members of federally insured | credit unions with $250,000 in coverage for their single | ownership accounts._ | | So pretty much the same coverage, just a different agency. | TulliusCicero wrote: | How is this functionally different? | | > What Is the NCUA? | | > The NCUA is an independent agency that oversees the | National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF). This | federal insurance fund, backed by the U.S. government, | insures member savings in federally insured credit unions. | Deposits at federally chartered credit unions are | automatically insured by the NCUA, but state-chartered credit | unions can opt for NCUA insurance too. Some 98% of U.S. | credit unions are federally insured. To find out if your | credit union is one of them, ask a representative or look for | the official NCUA insurance logo in its offices or on its | website. | latchkey wrote: | It is a different organization entirely. Functionally it is | declared the same in all the googling that I've done, but | in practice, are they? I don't know, and personally, I | don't really want to find out. | kerkeslager wrote: | This post made me chuckle. It's basically: I don't know | about it, therefore it's scary! | | But like, what do you know about the FDIC that you don't | know about the NCUA? I suspect to most people they're | both just opaque blobs of the US Federal government that | insure deposits up to $250,000, and that's the limit of | most people's understanding of either organization. If | you're not confident in the NCUA, I'm not sure what extra | information you could possibly have that would make you | suddenly confident in the FDIC. | latchkey wrote: | > I don't know about it, therefore it's scary! | | What's wrong with that? Seriously, belittling someone | because they don't know about something, so therefore | they'd rather avoid it, doesn't seem right either. | | I know about FDIC. I understand the rules. My bank has a | great explainer on their website about the coverage. I | don't know anything about NCUA and I don't care to learn, | because I'm already protected at the bank that I'm at. | 1123581321 wrote: | It's wrong because you weren't just trying to avoid it | personally; you were trying to scare others away by | confidently declaring a problem ("a big one") while | knowing you were ignorant about it. | delfinom wrote: | Yes, the NCUA enforces regulatory standards including | auditing for credit unions to remain insured. | | Actually in many ways the NCUA is a bit more open about | their work. | | Here's the NCUA informing all credit unions back in 2022 | that risk assessments are changing to factor in the sharp | rising interest rates affecting asset values. | | https://ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/letters-credit- | union... | | Want to know their enforcement history? Bam | https://ncua.gov/news/enforcement-actions/administrative- | ord... | IncRnd wrote: | The NCUA is the US Federal Government Agency that | oversees Credit Unions. | | A Credit Union is not the same as a bank, since a CU is | member-owned and member-controlled. | toast0 wrote: | Many of the credit unions I've looked at don't allow commercial | accounts. There's not a whole lot of need for people to hold | more than the deposit insurance amount in one institution, | whereas it does make sense for many companies. If more of the | deposits are covered by deposit insurance, I think there's less | of a risk of a bank run --- I wouldn't try to get a significant | amount out of my accounts even if I knew the credit union was | going to fail, because I know I can get it all on the Monday | after it fails; guaranteed by NCUA, backed by the US | Government. Still, I think a significant run would likely cause | the credit union to fail, it's not easy to provide 20% of | deposits on one day. | | Some credit unions do provide service to businesses though. So | they might have similar concentration of account issues. | dhosek wrote: | You're assuming rationality on the part of depositors. I | remember there being a run on a local savings and loan in the | town where I grew up when I was in my 20s. I knew a few | people who had money in CDs, well below the insurance amount, | who took the early withdrawal penalties to take their money | out of the S&L even though they were insured and their was no | chance of any loss if they just held tight. Sort of like all | the people who panic sell at a loss when the stock market | dips. | toast0 wrote: | I mean, if people run, the bank or credit union will fail. | But people are fundamentally lazy and there's not much of a | difference between getting your money on thursday and the | next monday, so there's less urgency. People are also | fundamentally panicy too, so I agree there's still a risk. | | Stock market 'circuit breakers' that halt trading when the | stock moves too fast seem to be pretty helpful. Maybe banks | need something that halts withdrawals when they reach 10% | of last reported deposits. (Spit ball: each depositor may | withdrawal at least 10% of their current balance or last | two statement balances, whichever is more, any excess is | allocated on a dollar basis across the day's withdrawal | requests. Some mechanism to pre-request funds so you can be | sure you can wire large payments for houses, etc) | SkyMarshal wrote: | It seems possible any deposit-taking financial institution | could have made the same mistake as SVB, be they a bank or | credit union or anything else. I don't think merely being a | credit union will shield them from this. They may have some by- | laws though that do protect them, but that's on a case-by-case | basis. | crabmusket wrote: | *by-laws | SkyMarshal wrote: | Thx, fixed :) | FormerBandmate wrote: | You can look up call reports to see how much exposure they | have to long-dated treasuries. Most major credit unions have | almost nothing, and they also don't have nearly the amount of | depositors above $250k so they're not really vulnerable to | bank runs | SkyMarshal wrote: | Thanks. Looks like you can find call report data for all | credit unions here: | | https://ncua.gov/analysis/credit-union-corporate-call- | report... | triyambakam wrote: | Can anyone clarify how to look at this data? There are a | few different reports. What would I look for to see how | healthy my credit union is? | justin66 wrote: | > frankly I could not tell you whether it's more or less | vulnerable to market instability or bank runs than a larger | bank | | For starters, there is not a conceivable credit union | equivalent to VCs telling all their companies to withdraw all | they can from their bank on a single day. Credit unions can | offer business accounts as well as individual accounts... but | still. | eBombzor wrote: | Cheeky | Der_Einzige wrote: | It appears to me that for the general person, credit unions are | strictly superior to regular banks. My credit union has | consistently offered me better rates, less BS, and less fees that | any other banks. | | The fact that they are non-profit cooperative institutions also | makes them significantly more desirable from a political | standpoint. Seems to be the "progressive" alternative to regular | banking. | joecool1029 wrote: | Since I was wondering about NCUA and credit union failures (as no | doubt many others coming to this thread are), looks like GAO | published on the topic: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-434 | 145 failures from 2010-2020. | caboteria wrote: | As anyone who was living in Rhode Island around 1990 can tell | you, credit unions are no more or less safe than banks. It's more | about ensuring proper oversight in either case. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhode_Island_banking_crisis | Waterluvian wrote: | I'm actually curious about your claim that they're just as | risky as banks. Is this true? Or are you just indicating that | it's at least _possible_ for a credit union to go bad? | downrightmike wrote: | Of course they can go bad, they have insurance similar to | FDIC. And just like small banks right now, they also have the | problem on getting loans to make interest on. Mortgages have | dried up. Refinancing is there too. Bigger banks have larger | opportunities, so they may be safer with loans being down. | Waterluvian wrote: | That they _can_ go bad is not in doubt. The comment | provided an example of this. | blep_ wrote: | I'd point the burden of proof the other way, tbh. I don't see | any reason one would be riskier than the other. | antisthenes wrote: | Only 300,000 depositors lost access. Considering the population | of the United States as a whole, this seems like a pretty | isolated and small incident, when you compare it something like | the 2008 failure. | | What makes you think this is sufficient evidence to claim that | they are no more safe than banks? | | Have there been other CU failures of note since 1990? (33 years | ago) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-12 23:02 UTC)