[HN Gopher] Why some GitHub labels are illegible ___________________________________________________________________ Why some GitHub labels are illegible Author : robinhouston Score : 113 points Date : 2023-03-13 12:18 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (firsching.ch) (TXT) w3m dump (firsching.ch) | frosted-flakes wrote: | The proposed color-contrast() function in the CSS Color Module | Level 6[1] will make solving this problem a lot easier. Rather | than doing some messy, complicated calculations on individual | color component values, this new function will allow you to pass | in a base color, an optional target contrast, and a list of | possible foreground colors (defaulting to white, black). The | function will choose the first option that meets the target | contrast, or the highest contrast if no target contrast is | supplied. | | For example: contrast-color( wheat tbd- | bg wcag2(aa), bisque, darkgoldenrod, olive, sienna, | darkgreen, maroon ) | | will return "darkgreen". | | - "wcag2(aa)" means level AA of the WCAG2.1 luminance contrast | algorithm, which computes to "4.5". | | - "tbd-bg/tbd-fg" sets whether it is determining the background | or the text color. | | This proposal is still in the experimental phase, and not all | parts of the spec are finalized (such as the tbd-bg or tbd-fg | keywords, or even the name of the function itself). | | [1]: https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css- | color-6/#colorcontras... | pyrolistical wrote: | Seems like something that could be calculated and baked server | side | frosted-flakes wrote: | If it's a static colour, sure. But if it's set by the user | with a colour picker, that doesn't really work. | ok_dad wrote: | For accessibility, it's better to do this client side, so | clients can adjust it themselves to be more contrasting or | whatever. | pyrolistical wrote: | that's cool. use both. calculate a good default contrast | server side, use proposal to allow client side to override | default | madeofpalk wrote: | except the server doesn't know if the client prefers light or | dark mode | ipython wrote: | The "almost unreadable" tags near the bottom of this page | reminded me of the Visual Contrast Test, which is said to be an | indicator of mold issues in the body: https://www.vcstest.com/ | | For example I couldn't tell the text at all in any of the four | tags, including the "hard to read" or "quite unreadable". | ntrz wrote: | Wouldn't the results of that online visual contrast test depend | on your monitor's color calibration, etc? Or is it designed in | some way that avoids that affecting the results? I'd hate to | think my body was infested with mold when I'm actually just | using a crappy 10-year-old monitor. | | Edit: I see from the FAQs there's some kind of display | calibration portion at the start of the test; should have read | the website more carefully before asking! | doix wrote: | > For example I couldn't tell the text at all in any of the | four tags, including the "hard to read" or "quite unreadable". | | For what it's worth, I couldn't tell the difference either. All | of them were completely incomprehensible. | CapstanRoller wrote: | What is a "mold issue"? | ipython wrote: | From the above website (I'm not advocating that it's right | just this is the claim): | | > What can cause a contrast sensitivity deficit? > Many | things can affect the ability to perceive contrast. These | include nutritional deficiencies, the consumption of alcohol, | drug/medication use, and exposure to endogenous or exogenous | neurotoxins and/or biotoxins, including volatile organic | compounds (VOCs), venom from animal or insect stings or | bites, some species of mold and the mycotoxins and microbial | VOCs they produce, cyanobacteria, dinoflagellates | (particularly Pfiesteria and Ciguatera), apicomplexans, | parasites, heavy metals like mercury and lead, and the | pathogens responsible for Lyme disease and its common co- | infections. For more information, see our Research resources. | zamadatix wrote: | Site note: on mobile it's easy to get a bit trapped trying to | drag and scroll because you end up spinning the 2 diagrams | instead | pier25 wrote: | Oh wow I didn't know max() existed in CSS. | | And it has decent support: | | https://caniuse.com/css-math-functions | agumonkey wrote: | I expected to learn more about visual contrast / ux / ergonomics, | but he's a topology math guy. Unexpected and delicious. | cowsup wrote: | "Never make the text color of labels grey," | | Honestly surprised GitHub did this. | | I've worked with software where a user picks a color for | something that renders text atop it. Never once did I think to | allow for an in-between color. | hinkley wrote: | The problem is that everyone says this but then nobody defines | 'grey'. | | It's been a while since I've done UX but I remember a couple of | rules of thumb involving projectors (if you work on project | management tools it is a certainty that your tool will be used | in anger on a projector, and shitty UI in an emotionally | charged room is a toxic cocktail). | | Anything greater than #eee is indistinguishable from white, and | anything less than #222 is indistinguishable from black. | | In the days before font weights actually worked, you could do | three font weights by mixing #222, #444, and bold. | | So that's a third of the greyscale range that isn't grey, at | least, and it also misses other mostly-grey colors, and a bunch | of shades of blue. Which I think is a long way of saying it's | not grey that's the problem, it's low-contrast that's the | problem. While grey is heavily represented in that set of | colors, it's not all of them, and it might not even be half of | them. | Dylan16807 wrote: | That's not the problem here, where they clearly defined the | goal colors as 000 and FFF, but the math fails sometimes. | thewataccount wrote: | I've also found in the dark mode that the background colors of | those labels are transparent and I think modified a bit (I'm not | sure how to tell) to lower the contrast. | | Basically they have this muted pastel look which I know is the | stylish thing, but it means there aren't really more then half a | dozen distinguishable label colors if that, because the contrast | is hindered so much by whatever they've done to it. | tobr wrote: | You can't make a conditional using < and ?: in CSS, can you? | That's why they are using a very sharp black/white gradient, | which unfortunately creates a gray in some cases. Apparently the | contrast is not sharp enough. | dan-robertson wrote: | Yeah I think it doesn't exist. | | In theory a solution would be something like: | clamp(0,(var(--perceived-lightness) - var(--threshold)) * | Infinity, 1) | | But most browsers don't support Infinity. I assume that GitHub | can find a suitably large number to put there though. (Maybe | I'm wrong though because of precision issues elsewhere). | | Another potential solution would be with sign but this function | is also largely unsupported | zX41ZdbW wrote: | I'm using the same algorithm to color logs in ClickHouse: | https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/82a6d75050513b... | | It also ignores Gamma, but at least it is described in the | comments in the code. | | Nevertheless, I enjoy the colors every time I launch clickhouse- | server. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-14 23:01 UTC)