[HN Gopher] Anki-fy your life ___________________________________________________________________ Anki-fy your life Author : mililitre Score : 179 points Date : 2023-03-18 15:19 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (abouttolearn.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (abouttolearn.substack.com) | thrown123098 wrote: | Using the pigeon hole principle on these systems tells me that if | I don't eventually drop all cards completely I will reach a point | where the only thing I'm doing is reviewing old material. None of | the algorithms I've looked into seem to acknowledge this. Is | there one which throws out a card after you get it right n times? | andersentobias wrote: | Unless you want to compete in Jeopardy or something, why bother | with ""uploading"" static chunks of information to your wetware? | Language learning aside. | | When categorizing notes to be remembered, I think it's good to | think in terms of memory retreival, not memory storage. In other | words, not to become an "archiever", because you probably want to | evolve your ideas by linking them together in your own unique way | -- unique as dicated by your problem at hand plus your own | idiosyncratic experiences. | | "How to take smart notes" by Sonke Ahrens is a great book on this | topic, admittedly more oriented towards a Zettelkasten/Obsidian | workflow. | sowbug wrote: | It's like exercise. As a software engineer, I'm very unlikely | to need to lift heavy things or run long distances. But my body | is (probably) healthier long-term if I'm able to do those | things. | | Disclaimer: going through my Anki decks is one of the 50 things | on my 10-item to-do list. I don't get to it often enough. But | it does work, and I now know how to memorize things I want to | remember. | coffeebeqn wrote: | Hmm sure but I feel like my brain gets too much intellectual | stimulation if anything from my job and relationships and | reading. If I try to do a leetcode at 8pm my brain is just | extremely fatigued and tells me to stop. My body on the other | hand just sits in a chair for a very large amount of the day | so I need to supplement there | sowbug wrote: | There's an old book called _The Richest Man In Babylon_ | that has to do with personal finance. One of the key points | is to _pay yourself first_. You have your rent, utility | bills, maybe credit-card debt, etc., and even tonight you | want to order in, even though it 's expensive, because | you're way too tired to cook. That's all fine, as long as | you first set aside 10% of your paycheck for savings. | Although that leaves only 90% left for all the other needs | clawing at you, somehow you make it all work. | | All too often people tend to their financial needs first, | and find there's nothing left for themselves. No surprise | most people die broke. Isn't it strange how their lifetime | income just happened to almost exactly equal their lifetime | expenses? Hmmm.... | | You might see where I'm going. Why are you giving the best | of your time (rather than money) to everyone else, leaving | nothing for yourself at the end of the day? Maybe start | with just five minutes at the start of the day to pay | yourself intellectually. If that works out, make it a | habit! | AlexAndScripts wrote: | I had a major concussion shortly before my GCSE exams that I'm | still very slowly recovering from. I was completely unable to | think, let alone study. I never did an IQ test, but I couldn't | even listen to a book or stay awake for more than a few hours | without a headache. And for a while I couldn't look at a screen | or read. | | I was able to get the second highest grades in the school, with | lower than expected grades in only two subjects (and dropping | one, further maths), because of Anki. Because Anki does not | require understanding, only sufficient repetition, and I had a | _lot_ of time on my hands, I was able to continuously do | flashcards for hours on end while maths work would have me | struggling to stay awake within 5 minutes. I could remember | facts without understanding them. | | The exams were ~3 months after it happened, which gave me time | to improve, plus during the actual exam a combination of | painkillers, extra time, rest breaks, exam technique, and | adrenaline allowed me to put together a plausible answer with | the disconnected facts I had learnt in the months preceeding | that I just about got the mark. As a sidenote - it's quite | incredible how adrenaline can temporarily improve brain | injuries, with the downside that the moment it went I was | completely exhausted. | | Every subject bar maths I got the grades I wanted or just | below, because Anki allowed me to memorise without learning. | | (These subjects were: Maths, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, | English Lit, English Lang, History, Computer Science, Digital | something, Creative Media Production (didn't do exam), Further | Maths (dropped).) | | Now, I would prefer not to revise using solely Anki, and I | think the fact a braindead student with memorised facts (and | good exam technique) was able to get good grades says a lot | about the British education system. It also says a lot about | Anki, and just how effective it is. | | Side note, because I'm tired of hearing drivel on HN: | | My life being (permanently?) ruined was entirely preventable, | all it would have taken is a little less empathy, a little less | second chances, for violent barbarians who damage everyone | around them. When people preach empathy they forget about the | human cost of allowing inherently violent, destructive people | to continue their actions. | | If you're one of those people who thinks grammar schools are | bad, restorative "justice" is the future, and we should | prioritise those who hurt and destroy over those who want to | learn and build: Your actions and your ideology have ugly | consequences beyond your selfish delusion of making the world | better through being nice and kind and the _power of love_ - | that belongs in novels, not policy. | hhjinks wrote: | I've never had a concussion, but I wanted to recount my | similar experience in school, too. Like you, 5 minutes of | math lectures had me dozing off. Really, a lecture in _any_ | subject would bore me to sleep. Only when we got practical | tasks to work on, like math or physics problems, did my brain | wake up and engage with and understand the material. As a | result, I excelled in the natural sciences and math, where | working on problems took up most of the time, while I did | poorly in the more memorization-oriented social sciences and | language subjects. Memorization is a skill like any other, | and I 'm happy I get to work in a field where understanding | is more important than memorization. | thenerdhead wrote: | We wrote pretty much the same comment. That's funny. | Juke_Ellington wrote: | This kind of static information retention is good for me. I'm | an electrician so it's nice to know off the top of my head that | there's a 10' spacing on supports for EMT without going to the | code book every time. Some of that knowledge gets beaten in | through repetition, but there are enough fringe cases and | things I don't touch for years that are nice to have memorized. | nathanmcrae wrote: | I find a good way to link together ideas is to have them easily | at hand i.e. memorized. Having a motivating problem is probably | a better way to do this, but I've found that motivating | problems which require concepts I would like to learn are not | as readily available as I'd want. | LastTrain wrote: | OK. Anki-Fy my life, sounds good. Read lots and lots of words | talking about improving memory. We are all knowledge workers, | right? Who doesn't want better long term recall? This blog post | links to another. More introductory words. The introduction goes | on to explain how I will now easily understand journal papers and | presentations. Great! But, to myself I think... "this sure is | starting to sound like snake oil, when do I get to the part where | it is actually explained what this Anki is..." and sure enough, | eventually I grow impatient and just go google it up and Anki is | just a $24.99 subscription flashcard app. Fuck me. | | [Edit: "fuck me" because I spent a few minutes suckered by an | elaborate advertisement disguised as actual content.] | magnio wrote: | Anki is an open source app: https://github.com/ankitects/anki | | Only the iOS version costs money, which is probably their only | revenue stream. | LastTrain wrote: | Hey I don't fault them for that, at all, I just get annoyed | when I am dumb enough to click on ads disguised as blog | posts. | Name_Chawps wrote: | Do you also get annoyed when you're dumb enough to think | Anki isn't free? | shostack wrote: | Uh, I'm on Windows and Android and never once paid for it. Not | at what you're seeing. iOS pricing? | [deleted] | Jtsummers wrote: | The Anki dev sells the app on iOS and iPadOS (his only | revenue stream for Anki other than donations), but it's a one | time cost, not a subscription. GP just failed to read or | comprehend what they read. Or possibly they found one of the | other apps also called Anki which try to capitalize on the | name and confusion. | triyambakam wrote: | Anki is free. And the concept of SRS is free. There are apps | that are clearly very good at capitalizing on the success of | Anki and charging. If you found the paid iPad app, that's a one | time fee to help the developers maintain it in the app store. I | think it's pretty steep but otherwise Anki is free on other | platforms. I actually don't like Anki but don't want it to be | mischaracterized | Ardon wrote: | Not sure where you found a subscription to Anki, but it's free | and open source: https://github.com/ankitects/anki | | The iOS app is a one-time payment though. | | This article is definitely not written with an unfamiliar | reader in mind though, that's for sure. | palmy wrote: | Anki is free on anything but iOS. Don't know why the iOS app is | the only one with a fee. | Jtsummers wrote: | https://faqs.ankiweb.net/why-does-ankimobile-cost-more- | than-... | | Here's the FAQ entry for why it costs as much as it does for | iOS/iPadOS with some explanation for why he only charges on | those platforms. | rahimnathwani wrote: | IIRC the Android app is free because it wasn't started by | Anki's original author. It was created by some other folks, | using the source for Anki desktop. | JCharante wrote: | I imagine people with iphones have more disposable income and | wouldn't be as affected by a cost compared to charging | android users. | throwaway675309 wrote: | I literally just typed in Anki on Google and the first link to | their homepage very obviously explains that it's free to use | even with synchronization across multiple devices. The only | cost I can think of is that they charge a one time fee for the | mobile app for iOS, but the clients for android and desktop | apps for computers are completely free. I have no idea where | you got your information from but perhaps next time do a basic | cursory search on the internet instead of querying ChatGPT. | CGamesPlay wrote: | To be fair, Anki is trademark-squatted in many flash card | apps on the net. Even on the iOS App Store, there are | multiple squatters for "Anki" that outrank the real one. | thenerdhead wrote: | I really like https://readwise.io/ for this purpose regarding all | the books I've read and the quotes I like to re-visit here and | there. It uses a SRS technique. | | While this type of article is almost cliche at this point | regarding someone coming across the memory limitations and the | power of anki for the first time, I really think the case for | anki is exaggerated with "important ideas". | | Anki is great for preparing to go on jeopardy or being in say med | school. It is not really needed for lifelong learning. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zettelkasten might be a better | approach but even then it is debatable how often you'll ever | actually use it once the novelty wears off. | | Anki is a tool to be used, not something that needs to be applied | to everything. | qznc wrote: | Zettelkasten is for facts you want to be easy to look up. Anki | is for things you want to remember instantly without looking | them up. I use both. | JaDogg wrote: | Shameless plug if you want flashcards in your terminal: | https://github.com/JaDogg/sbx | MichaelNolan wrote: | I'm a huge fan of spaced repetition and Anki. I strongly believe | that most people's professional lives would be improved by using | it. There is a huge amount of information that falls into the | zone of it's needed often enough that not knowing it is a pain, | but it's not needed often enough that you would "naturally" | remember it. | | I've yet to find anything else that only takes 10 to 20 minutes a | day that has a higher ROI. The amount of "compounding interest" | it gives over time is incredible. | | Learning to write good cards is skill that takes time and | practice. The article from Andy Matuschak [0] is a great guide to | learn how to write good cards. | | [0] https://andymatuschak.org/prompts/ | coffeebeqn wrote: | Why is it useful? My job at least isn't bottlenecked by me not | memorizing enough things. Or maybe it is! But I'm not convinced | senguidev wrote: | This could give you some clues: http://augmentingcognition.co | m/ltm.html#:~:text=How%20import... (see part II) | watwut wrote: | It seems to me that pretty much anything has better ROI then | 10-20 minutes of pure rote memorization a day. Plus, keeping in | 10-20 minutes a day requires separate skill on itself. Anki has | a way of taking over and expanding the time it requires. | MichaelNolan wrote: | > of pure rote memorization | | I wouldn't describe my use of Anki as "rote memorization". | Though certainly some people use it that way. There is a big | difference between blindly putting raw and unfamiliar facts | into an SRS, and using an SRS to remember things you have | learned and understand. It's the second case that pays large | dividends over time. | yt-sdb wrote: | Do you have a TLDR for that article? It's pretty long and | wordy. | andrem wrote: | This is from Kagi's summarizer: Anki is a | powerful tool for improving long-term memory. Anki is | best used in service to a creative project. It is | important to ask good questions when using Anki. Anki | is most useful for learning new fields. Anki can be | used to develop virtuoso skills. It is important to | avoid orphan questions and yes/no patterns when using Anki. | Memory is complicated and we should be careful before putting | too much faith in any given model. Distributed practice | is important for maximizing retention. Anki can be used | to remember non-verbal experiences. Anki can be used to | memorize APIs and code. | submeta wrote: | The article discusses how to create effective prompts that | aid in long-term learning using spaced repetition. Matuschak | suggests that good prompts should be specific, clear, and | concise, and should be designed to encourage active recall | rather than passive recognition. | | He also emphasizes the importance of interleaving, which | involves mixing up different types of problems or questions | to enhance retention and facilitate transfer of knowledge. | Additionally, he suggests that prompts should be personalized | and contextualized to increase engagement and motivation. | jstummbillig wrote: | Okay, so was this written by chatgpt | zvmaz wrote: | I have found out that I was bad at card making when reviewing | the first cards I made after a lapse of time of not using | Anki. My then self got frustrated and irritated by how vague | and non-specific the cards I made myself were. I certainly | learned something about my memory and cognition. The article | is long, but it has some insights that resonated with me. I | think the quality of the cards one makes is as important, if | not more so, than spaced repetition. | triyambakam wrote: | Anki (or a Leitner box) is the recommended method from the book | "Fluent Forever" | | After learning one language in school and a few others ad hoc on | my own I gave this method a try. | | I quickly gave up, though, once I discovered Dr Krashen's work on | comprehensible input, and how boring and time consuming creating | and studying Anki is. | | Dr Krashen's work says that we learn language when we understand | it. I.e. when we receive input at our level. There are quite a | number of Youtube channels that claim to teach through this | method, but many of them still resort to drills, themed | vocabulary, grammar etc that are all pointless in the CI method. | | The best one I've seen so far is Dreaming Spanish. | | What's so cool about the CI method is that the spaced repetition | is built in, implicit - if you're getting input at your level you | will be getting repetition. | | Children's shows are a great way to get input. Many countries | have TV apps on iPad and can be viewed free with a VPN. | | As an experiment I had my daughter only consume German media | (living in Sweden) for a few years and she can now speak better | German than I can, and I have never corrected her. She has | broader and more modern vocabulary, naturally. | miklosz wrote: | I find Anki essential for language learning. Did it for French, | starting from 0 and finishing at B2 (except for writing) in two | years (also taking a 3h / week course). | | Especially at the very beginning, I find learning the first 500 | words as described in "Fluent Forever" very helpful. Going | through that before starting with the course makes the | experience much easier. | | I totally agree with Krashen's theories, but using Anki is a | secret weapon here that puts the process on overdrive (e.g. | reading on Kindle and then later going through words that I | checked in the Kindle dictionary and adding them into Anki). | | Also, it's essential to retain the knowledge, e.g. if it's a | language that you don't use daily. | | 5 years and 30'000+ cards later, I find Anki indispensable in | learning anything which requires memorisation. Thinks I have to | learn for work, for hobbies, certificates, improving my | vocabulary in languages I care about. Basically, every fact I | care about strongly enough, goes into Anki. If not enough, goes | into Obsidian. | mojomark wrote: | It'd be cool to have a system like chatgpt (maybe converted to | audio) that you could use to practice conversations in a | different language. | bluquark wrote: | Personally, as an intermediate Japanese learner, I have been | careful to choose the right input just as Krashen advocates, | but I _also_ find Anki indispensable. I found to my surprise | that I have been improving about equally quickly using | Anki+Animebook+Yomichan for 1-2 hours a day while living the US | as I did during an earlier period when I was living in Japan | (but without access to computerized methods beyond a basic | pocket e-dict). | | As a beginner, appropriate input was enough to care of "spaced | repetition" on its own, since children's media constantly | rotates over the same small set of vocabulary. But after I | improved past the ~2000 most common words or so, it happened | more and more that a word I recently learned didn't appear | again in my input until it had already been flushed. The | probability that I would _actually_ learn a new word for good | progressively decreased as I picked the lower-hanging fruit, | which is the cause of the dreaded "intermediate plateau". | | I gather Anki pushes out the plateau much further: I have heard | that it starts to feel Sisyphean to learn new words with it | around the 15000-20000 word mark instead. | wenc wrote: | Learning languages is a statistical problem. | | You have to learn the high frequency words/phrases _in context_ | (forget 500 most common vocabulary lists -- those don 't work). | As a child, you do this naturally. | | However, there are certain situations where Anki helps. I find | it's with words that are useful but don't occur frequently | enough to pattern match. For instance, the word "ad hoc" in | English -- it occurs in professional speech, but not quite | often enough for you to remember what it means in context. This | is where Ankifying can really help. | | Ankifying commonly confused words/phrases can also help. For | instance, in English the word "put" can be used in so many | contexts, and many of those contexts don't occur frequently, | but can be the source of funny mistakes. | | "Put up (with)" and "put out" and "put in" all mean different | things in different contexts. Embedding context in your Anki | cards will help you recall these contexts. | pixelperfect wrote: | I find there's a sweet spot for Anki when the daily review of | already-existing cards takes 20 minutes. If the daily review | takes more than 25 minutes, I try not to add any cards that day. | CGamesPlay wrote: | I have mine set to 20 new cards/day and 200 remember cards/day. | This seems to steady out at about 20 mins day. That said, I | wish Anki had a time-boxed mode, where it measured my speeds | and then just chose the right balance of new cards. | | (Cards added above the new card limit go into a queue for | future days automatically.) | bitdivision wrote: | I started out using anki to improve my Spanish vocabulary. | Eventually discovered Mochi [0] here on HN. Far better designed | and executed, well worth a look if you're interested in Anki. | | [0] https://mochi.cards/ | liendolucas wrote: | Question aside. Does anyone know straightforward ways to create | anki decks? | | Last time I checked on this it was like a lot of effort to put on | and got discouraged to build my own decks to improve my italian. | I was expecting anki decks to be constructed easily, in its most | basic form from plain text files (html, markdown, etc) with | references to maybe resources (audio, images, etc) just from a | filesystem directory but is not that simple. | | I can't recall the name of a Python tool that allowed you to | create decks programmatically but I found it way too much effort | to use it and I couldn't find other good alternatives (maybe this | has changed recently, don't know). | | Does anyone recommend a good, simple and straightforward tool to | create decks/cards? (I'm using FreeBSD). | vector_spaces wrote: | There's a Python library called genanki that has a minor | learning curve but isn't terrible to figure out. My process is | to maintain a gsheet with data I use to generate my flashcards, | then manually download the CSV data, and run a Python script to | convert everything into the Anki format. | | If I'm not mistaken it's also possible to import CSV data | directly into anki without the intermediate Python script | liendolucas wrote: | Yes, this is the one I previously found (thanks for sharing). | Found it ridiculously complex for what an anki card seems to | be... I mean from the docs I found this: | | > "...You need to pass a model_id so that Anki can keep track | of your model." | | At that time I wondered myself: "Why on earth do I need to | keep track of a model id for an anki card?" then quickly move | forward on the docs without paying too much attention and | finally put it aside... | huimang wrote: | Anki can import csv files. | | That said, making decks is extremely tedious. It's better than | a premade deck for learning language vocabulary, but it's time | consuming. | | You shouldn't make vocabulary cards programmatically. If you're | going to invest time into learning a card, you need to be | absolutely sure that it's correct. Otherwise you've wasted your | own time. | | When I was using Anki daily, I'd reserve about 20 mins or so in | the evening to input new words. | doktorhladnjak wrote: | Maybe it's just me, but I can't think of anything in my job as a | software engineer that I'd benefit from memorizing through flash | cards. What are people memorizing exactly? | sowbug wrote: | Coworkers' names and the reason for meeting with them. | | I used Anki for this when I was in a management position that | involved meeting with many people, often just once or twice | each, across my very large company. It was nice to be able to | greet someone by name in the cafeteria six months after our | meeting, and ask how such-and-such project was going. I'm sure | some people already remember names, faces, and context | effortlessly. I'm not one of those people. But I always | appreciate when someone remembers me, so I was willing to work | to do the same for them. | | I stopped doing it once my work universe got a little more | stable, and life's daily encounters were themselves the spaced | repetition I needed to remember everyone. | johtso wrote: | I've also never used anki for anything related to my work / | programming. | | What I have used it for: Memorising how to | identify plants and their latin names Memorising the | technical terms for different morphological features of plants | so that I could efficiently use a vegetative identification key | without constantly flicking to the glossary Memorising | foreign language vocabulary | shusaku wrote: | One of these days I need to make flash cards of those makefile | automatic variables... | kobalsky wrote: | you can use it to memorize some console commands, library | calls, anything you would like to be able to remember without | checking the source material. | tastysandwich wrote: | I absolutely love Anki. | | A lot of software make empty promises around productivity | improvements. Especially in education. Anki is one of those rare | tools that genuinely 10x's you over your peers. I used it when | studying Japanese and it was a massive help. | | However, having used it for over 12 years to memorise many | different things I have noticed one caveat. | | If you're not also using what you're memorising outside of Anki, | I feel like your ability to recall gets trapped within the | context of using Anki. | | For example, if you're learning Japanese vocab through Anki, and | also trying out your new words via conversation and | reading/writing, you'll rapidly learn new vocab AND be able to | recall it anywhere. | | However if you're learning Japanese on your own and not really | conversing/writing, no matter how good your recall with Anki is, | you'll struggle to recall those same words anywhere else. | | The cool thing about Anki is you can also use pictures/audio. So | if you're learning music theory you could memorise chord | shapes/intervals. Or human anatomy. | dkarl wrote: | The way I think of memorization is as scaffolding. Rote | memorization is very different from the skill or understand you | are trying to build, and for this reason, many people are | skeptical about the value of it. Why practice rote memorization | when what you really want is very different? But this is like | trying to construct a building without using scaffolding. | | If you only use Anki and don't do anything else, it's like | building scaffolding on an empty lot, and then building more | and more scaffolding without using it to build anything else. | bluquark wrote: | I've noticed this too, I study with Anki J->E cards and it | supercharges my reading skill, helps somewhat my listening | skill, and basically does nothing at all for my speaking skill. | | I was wondering how much adding audio cards or "reversed" E->J | cards to my routine might help. Are those variations worth the | trouble? | Macha wrote: | My experience is that doing so has had a minor improvement in | my J->E recall, but a major improvement in my E->J recall. If | you never intend to write/speak Japanese and just want to | build to watching anime or something, I guess you could give | it a miss, but I think it's pretty worthwhile. | | The one caveat with Anki specifically for reversed cards is | when you add a bunch of new cards or a new deck and it | presents you the reversed card right after the basic card. | | e.g. seeing the Xing se -> shiawase (happy) card then | immediately after the happy -> Xing se card, sure you're | going to be telling Anki this was an "easy" card, but that's | much more about the immediacy than the level of recall you | have. | | For my purposes I actually have three sets of cards in my | Japanese deck, one each for kana, kanji and english front | card and the other two on the reverse cards (unless my | textbook omits the kanji because of it being rarely used in | the real world, as for some words). | bluquark wrote: | Thanks! | | > unless my textbook omits the kanji because of it being | rarely used in the real world, as for some words | | I have found this usually proves to be a mistake, textbooks | and dictionaries pretend that you need far less kanji than | you actually do. Lately I started to mine Anki words from | conversations on Japanese twitter and I discovered that | everyone casually throw around all kinds of kanji that are | not on the Jouyou list and in words every textbook insisted | were primarily kana. | | I think it might be because modern IMEs have made it much | easier to casually use rare-ish kanji. Technology has | expanded the range of everyone's recall and writing speed, | while the textbooks are still reflecting the world of 20 | years ago. | tastysandwich wrote: | Personally I never did audio cards (though I did a lot of | listening and conversation outside of Anki) or reverse cards | for Japanese. My vocab decks were J->E, and my Kanji decks | were Kana->Kanji. I always practised writing my answers on | the screen using the whiteboard feature. | | I think you should strive to keep your decks under 15 minutes | total. That means you can complete them in three 5-minute | blocks a day. Any longer and I found I would A) miss a deck, | meaning I had to catch up the next day; or B) try to rush | through them. | | I highly recommend trying to engage in conversation as much | as possible. In my city (in Australia) I went to | "conversation classes". Basically Japanese people wanting to | improve their English would meet with Australians wanting to | improve their Japanese. It went for an hour, half of which | was spent talking in English, and half in Japanese. And if | you can only speak a little bit of Japanese, it's totally | fine, you can just speak in broken Japanese mixed with | English. It was really fun! You'll find opportunities to use | your new vocab, and it'll stick much better. | TwentyPosts wrote: | This is also what I'd call the classic issue with Duolingo. Or | rather, one of them, considering that the app has all sorts of | issues. | | If you use nothing but Duolingo you'll plateau very quickly. | It's probably "okay" as a casual side spaced-repetition | learning tool--when you're learning languages you generally | want to pull from several different resources, and learn with | different tools anyway. But don't make the mistake of thinking | that Duolingo alone will get you anywhere. | | I think this universally applies to repetition-learning, at | least when it comes to languages. You need to "cross-train". | bluquark wrote: | > Or rather, one of them, considering that [Duolingo] has all | sorts of issues. | | Yep. I agree with measured criticisms of Anki even while | feeling the app is really useful if you use it well. Whereas | Duolingo isn't worth bothering with at all. It's purely | optimized to maximize engagement/revenue. | wizzwizz4 wrote: | Duolingo used to be better: people who are talking about | Duolingo might be referencing how it used to be. | TwentyPosts wrote: | I'm not. I'm a new user, and I notice that Duolingo kind | of sucks, but I am getting some amount of value out of | it. I'm very open to suggestions for better language | learning apps, though. | bluquark wrote: | When you hit diminishing returns on a walled-garden | language-learning app, it's time to create a continuous | intake of real-world media at your level that you enjoy, | plus a suite of inline understanding+memory tools to | extract the maximum learning out of that media. | | I have been following many of the recommendations on | https://learnjapanese.moe/resources/. Most of the recs | are language-specific, but perhaps you can still draw | some inspiration from the methods and look for equivalent | tools in your target language. | TwentyPosts wrote: | As someone who didn't like the idea of learning a language | at all but has to, I'm glad that Duolingo gave me a very, | _very_ easy way to get started with literally anything at | all. It 's simple and streamlined, meaning that it's easy | to start and stick with it instead of getting hung up on | how to find a good textbook, or figuring out how to use | Anki "properly". | | This also applies to practicing every single day: I find it | easy to do a few Duolingo "lessons" as warm-up before | delving into more in-depth practice. | | Nowadays I would not use it for real "practice" at all. I | use it to check my understanding for 5-15 minutes a day. If | I make mistakes in Duolingo (eg. forming the plural, | remembering the dative for a given grammatical gender) then | I look these things up and study them. | | I might drop Duolingo completely at some point, but for now | I'm getting a non-zero amount of value out of it--I am | increasingly looking into better options, though. I'm | already looking Anki, and I'm sure there are some other | language learning apps out there. | zora_goron wrote: | I also had a similar thought process regarding understanding vs | memorizing facts while transitioning from studying CS (where I | emphasized understanding the underlying concepts rather than | trying to memorize atomic facts that I could derive) to medicine | (where having facts memorized is also a key component). | Interestingly, I found that committing to memorizing facts | actually helped me gain a deeper understanding of the topics | themselves, which was not what I originally expected! (I wrote a | little bit about the above a few months ago -- | https://samrawal.substack.com/p/on-the-relationship-between-...) | Jensson wrote: | > Interestingly, I found that committing to memorizing facts | actually helped me gain a deeper understanding of the topics | themselves, which was not what I originally expected | | Be careful with this, perceived self understanding doesn't | reflect real understanding. | rg111 wrote: | There is only one real way to test, and the subject being CS, | it is even more real: _building things using those concepts_. | | For other subjects (and CS, too): demonstrate mastery with | teaching others, producing something with the concepts | learned and get feedback. | | This way one can test true learning. And, even when tested | this way, Spaced Repeatition really helps. I am speaking from | experience. | | When you are in a place where you can immerse yourself in a | proper environment, like a college or work- where you hear | terms and their usage regularly, learning becomes easier. | | But when your environment is cut-off from the buzzing world, | or everyone is doing ML and you want to do Cybersecurity, you | can _fake_ immersion using Anki. A good part of physical | immersion can be replaced with using Anki. | nearmuse wrote: | I am trying this approach right now. It is difficult to do it for | big concepts because they take time to recall in their entirety | and can't be reduced to one key idea to be recalled quickly. It | may also be hard to estimate what interval to use, and bloated | repetition sessions are killing the whole idea of spending some | 10s of minutes a day, causing a sort of fatigue if not outright | burnout. | mahathu wrote: | I'm sure taking 10 minutes out of their day to reflect and write | a diary entry would increase most peoples wellbeing a lot more | than trying to neurotically remember everything you come across. | kayo_20211030 wrote: | Is there a measure, anywhere, of the bollocks to content ratio on | HN on Saturdays? It seems to peak that day. But, this one is so | bad, it's not even wrong. Who on earth knows what the future will | bring? Who on earth knows, ahead of time, what's worth 10 | minutes, or 2 minutes, or no time at all. That's intuition, and | that's a gift. All the rest is bollocks, and it seems to turn up | on Saturdays too much; that is, the pieces that claim to have | identified a "system". | 1024core wrote: | I'm trying to get into Anki, but it's difficult to get started. | | Here's what I'd like: while I'm reading a (PDF) book, I want to | highlight some text (and maybe manually tweak it a little) and | have it converted into some "Anki card" format so when I want to | review the contents of the book later, I can use Anki for it. | | Any ideas? | siegecraft wrote: | This is a common use case and many reader / annotation apps | either support it natively (polarized and marginnote 3 are two | that I have first hand experience with) or have third party | tools available to copy annotations into anki. | kneebonian wrote: | So sounds like more of what you are interested in is | incremental reading. In the case the way you'd want to do | things is copy the text to another document for the entire | article then go back through determine which facts you want to | keep. | | Then turn it into an Anki card, preferably with clozes. | | Half the benefit of Anki is making the Anki cards in the first | place. | JCharante wrote: | Highlight the text in your dedicated PDF reading program and | then after each lesson/chapter, when you sit down to review the | lesson (you should be doing this even if you don't use Anki!) | you can create the Anki cards manually. Creating Anki cards is | really helpful for learning. I used to study at a langauge | school and whenever I came across a word I didn't know, I'd | quickly write it down in a notebook in the middle of class and | then later in the day go back and create Anki cards for the | words I had written down. | resoluteteeth wrote: | Maybe you could use some app to pull out highlights but you | still need to think carefully about how to make each text chunk | into a card or multiple cards (otherwise you'll waste more time | than you save) | | You also don't normally use an srs flashcard program like anki | just when you want to review a book, you use it every day. | yellow_postit wrote: | Check out AnkiConnect for getting things into Anki. Not sure | about reader software that will call out after a highlight | though. | ichverstehe wrote: | Allow me to mention my project Ankivalenz[1], which turns | structured HTML files into Anki decks. I use it with Quarto[2][3] | to generate my Anki decks. Instead of having an unorganized | "pool" of Anki cards, I can create hierarchical, well-organized | notes and turn them into an Anki deck. This makes it easier to | create Anki decks, but more importantly, it makes it easier to | keep Anki decks up to date. | | [1] https://github.com/vangberg/ankivalenz | | [2] https://quarto.org/ | | [3] https://github.com/vangberg/quarto-ankivalenz | keiferski wrote: | I've experimented with Anki over the years and currently have a | somewhat custom setup that I do every day / nearly every day. | I'll explain below for anyone that might find it useful. | | At one point I realized that my capacity for learning new items | for a particular topic is limited to a few items per day. Any | more than 2 or 3 and I struggle to retain the information. So, | for example, trying to learn 20 words in Chinese per day is | impossible without spending multiple hours on it. | | The trick, however, is that I get around this by having _many | items_ from _multiple topics_ , instead of many items from a | single topic. Instead of 20 words in Chinese, I learn 1 word each | in 20 different languages. Surprisingly, I have a much easier | time with this and don't need to spend much time on it in order | to retain the information. I don't know why this psychologically | works, but it does. And while learning 2 or 3 words a day won't | make you fluent anytime soon, it does add up over time, | especially for topics that you aren't in a hurry to learn but | would like to know on a slow timeline, in a year or two. For | example, learning the Japanese hiragana/katakana or the numbers | of all the US presidents. | | However, this proved to be somewhat unwieldy logistically as I | had to open 20 different PDFs, download audio for each word, then | stitch it all together daily. So I created a little web app | (stitched together from some WordPress plugins, actually) that | allows me to import learning materials and then display 2-3 of | them per topic on a single page, each time the page is loaded. I | just visit the page once a day and add the items to Anki. | | This was all a bit complex to set up, but if you enjoy learning | new things and want an efficient system for adding stuff into | your brain, I recommend making something similar. | hobo_mark wrote: | Is that a real example? Are you learning 20 languages in | parallel? Two is already more than enough for me. | keiferski wrote: | Yes I am currently learning one word/phrase (it depends on | the language) daily in about twenty different languages. | Again, I wouldn't claim it to be equivalent to serious study | and conversational practice, but I have absolutely learned | various phrases in all of the languages. | | I think most people make "language learning" a heavy task | that seems insurmountable. In reality, once you understand | the basic sounds of a language, it can be as simple as | learning a new phrase everyday. Just think of it as learning | the names of capital cities or elements on the periodic | table: a lot of information that is organized into patterns. | | No, you won't be fluent quickly, but it is absolutely | beneficial to know "hello", "thank you", "where is?" and 100 | other phrases in a language. Or in the case of Russian or | Hebrew or Greek, it's awesome to just be able to read the | alphabet, even if you don't know many of the words. | ryyr wrote: | "Don't memorize ideas. And don't take us too seriously when we | turn up our noses at rote learning. Rote helps build the man." | spoonjim wrote: | What kinds of things are useful to learn in this rote way? Except | maybe foreign language vocabulary? | knubie wrote: | Spaced repetition systems are not used to learn things. They're | used to remember things you've already learned. | keiferski wrote: | Pretty much anything. I use it to learn foreign alphabets and | languages, historical people and events, philosophical terms, | computer networking concepts, outdoor survival tips, and a | bunch of other things. The best sources of information are | encyclopedias (traditional ones, not Wikipedia) and | dictionaries, as they are written to summarize a concept in a | few hundred words. | hidelooktropic wrote: | Anki is a huge part of my routines having ADHD. | https://www.adamgrant.info/Being+Human/ADHD/Strategies/Flash... | | It's like slowly uploading information to my brain for permanent | storage. | nohaydeprobleme wrote: | A major limitation exists for spaced repetition software (e.g. | Anki, SuperMemo, or other flashcard-style systems), in my | experience using them for several years for long-term memory: | it's neither necessary nor sufficient to use this software to | learn certain topics. | | Several excellent physics and math students I worked with have | never used spaced repetition software, but were excellent at | their studies because they consistently solved textbook problems. | For them, they got the "repetitions" (aka exposure to facts and | problems) via solving more new problems from the book nearly | every day. Later problems in the textbooks would provide review | of previous problems. This method can be far more effective than | spending too much studying with spaced repetition software (which | I have done in the past), as the time spent creating new cards | and reviewing cards that are due comes at the expense of time | spent solving new problems. | | Ideally, you can perhaps find time for both activities. But in my | personal experience, I learned mathematics more effectively by | focusing primarily on textbook problems (reviewing older material | through new problems) and spending a very limited amount of time | with spaced repetition, versus even a fifty-fifty split between a | textbook and spaced repetition that I've experimented with in the | past. | | In the past, I also spent too much time in the past remembering | phrases and vocabulary when learning new languages, and not | enough time practicing listening, writing, and especially | conversation. Certain skills can only be efficiently developed by | directly practicing them. While spaced repetition software | remains an essential part to my language studies, it is very far | from sufficient (even just a couple hours of conversation | practice per week over three months, got me much further than | primarily focusing on Anki/spaced repetition for six months). | | Spaced repetition systems like Anki (though I moved to SuperMemo | about a year back) are vital to my daily studies, but I've | learned far more effectively by treating these systems as a | supplement to more traditional and tested study methods that rely | on active problem-solving. For technical fields, these are | textbook problems from books by well-regarded authors, and for | languages, these are conversation practice and writing articles | that I request feedback on (in particular, teachers in small | group classes have given me great, useful feedback on my | writing). | Kokouane wrote: | > I learned mathematics more effectively by focusing primarily | on textbook problems (reviewing older material through new | problems) | | As a caveat, sometimes it can be hard to do this. If I randomly | pick textbook problems, I have no guarantee that the new | material will review the old. | crazygringo wrote: | Right, there's a big distiction to be made here. | | Knowledge that is primarily _conceptual_ (like almost all of | math) generally does not benefit from spaced repetition. The | learning involved is _understanding_ -- a new concept may be | hard to understand in the first place, but once you get it, you | don 't really forget it. Or you just need a super-quick | refresher if you haven't touched it for a few months. | | While knowledge that is primarily _arbitrary-factual_ is the | perfect candidate for spaced repetition -- mainly things like | vocabulary, medical terms, and so forth. Just associating a | largely arbitrary name for something. And indeed they are | mostly useful for learning for exams. E.g. I used it to learn | Chinese characters and could never have passed Chinese class | otherwise. But on the other hand when I actually _lived_ in | another country that speaks a different language, spaced | repetition _isn 't_ much of a help -- you learn vocab just by | absorbing it day-to-day, like a kid does. | PartiallyTyped wrote: | N=1. I found that conceptual knowledge and eureka moments | always result in substantial or at least non trivial changes | in the way I parse and understand information, so much so | that their integration is seamless, automatic and permanent. | | Otoh, certain stuff that are not particularly important need | frequent repetition, eg learning a foreign language that you | are not actively using. | | I am considering using it for leetcode problems and | questions. | watwut wrote: | > Otoh, certain stuff that are not particularly important | need frequent repetition, eg learning a foreign language | that you are not actively using. | | In that use case, you are much better off reading content | in that language and watching content in that language. | Vocabulary memorization as isolated activity makes sense | only as additional activity if you have additional time on | top of that. | PartiallyTyped wrote: | I mainly use anki with cards that involve the vocab in | some context. I found that the context enabled me to | eventually understand without translating to any other | language, I am still quite limited though. I think that | falls into your suggestion of learning within some kind | of broader context, which I agree. | fluidcruft wrote: | But the arbitrary-factual isn't they way people recommend | using Anki. I really struggle to understand exactly what | people are actually using it to learn. There are a lot of | medical students and that makes sense, but that is... | arbitrary-factual. | | I've tried many times with other material, but I always get | far more out of creating condensed notes and reviewing actual | notes than quizzing random factioids in Anki. | | I get that probably the idea is that creating prompts could | guide me about which notes to review, but it seems easier to | just review the notes. I think the people doing Anki are just | putting the effort into making cards rather than into making | notes. It would probably be nice if it were easy to convert | notes into Anki but everything I've tried sucks and it just | make taking each hour of taking notes into two hours of | making notes and cards. I could have just reviewed notes for | that hour. Closures are sort of okay but converting notes | into closures is a bigger pain in the ass than it should be. | | Maybe someone can make a LLM that takes some corpus of text | and generates Anki cards of key points for review. Then I | could just feed my notes in. But otherwise it really seems | like a huge waste of time. | roundandround wrote: | It would definitely be hard to use Anki for conceptual | learning that requires fresh problems to prevent memorizing | answers. One could link to an outside site keyword | categorizing problems matching specifics, I suppose.. | | Really though a lack of spaced repetition on practising | conceptual problems is just as noticeable as the lack of | spaced repetition on factual learning. Very few fields are so | perfectly structured that you get practices on their earliest | levels by doing later levels and then working in the field, | i.e. plenty of mathematicians admit they no longer do | arithmetic well. | kneebonian wrote: | I've found the sweet spot.for Anki is the things that I need | only occasionally but not never. | | Things I use frequently I already pick up through repeated use, | things that I never use eventually falls out. | | But things that are somewhat relevant about that I find myself | googling more than twice is a good candidate to Anki. | qznc wrote: | I'm switching my job next month. That means a lot of new | acronyms to learn of software components, departments, and | projects. Anki helps me learn them. | watwut wrote: | > Several excellent physics and math students I worked with | have never used spaced repetition software, but were excellent | at their studies because they consistently solved textbook | problems. | | Isn't it the case that only minority of students uses this | software or flashcards in general anyway? I mean, of course it | is possible to succeed without it, because overwhelming | majority of students/learners are not using it. | nohaydeprobleme wrote: | The idea gets more interesting depending on your idea of | success. If success just means passing the course, you | definitely don't need spaced repetition (but then again, you | can also maybe get by via cramming two or three days before | each test and rushing assignments, though this wouldn't be a | good experience). | | If you define success as doing very well in the course (and | remembering what you learn in the long-term), the idea gets | more interesting because more people interested in these | outcomes use flashcard systems. Anki is especially popular | among medical students, so it's a tempting idea to consider | that applying spaced repetition to subjects like mathematics | or physics can also be useful. | | To some people studying math or physics, the software can | potentially be a nice aide, but in my individual experience, | I understood and remembered concepts better by spending more | time practicing problems and doing sample tests, versus | spending more time using spaced repetition software. | watwut wrote: | That is the thing ... I don't recall best students doing | flashcards all that much in cs, math and physics. I | actually associated this more with groups of students who | don't understand, so they memorize without understanding. | When you understand the concept, it is also much easier to | remember the thing. | nohaydeprobleme wrote: | That's a fair observation. My personal experience has a | bias because I knew a math and computer science major who | was hardworking and seemed bright at academics, and he | was really into Anki. | | Knowing him led to my impression that a decent number of | math and physics students might have studied with spaced | repetition without talking much about it, as he only | mentioned it after he saw me studying with the software | once. But in hindsight, I agree that it's more likely | that math & physics students stick to the learning habits | they developed earlier on--often through lots of practice | tests and exercises. | | Anki seems to be more of a natural progression for people | in other fields like biology, where students might | develop habits of using flashcards with software like | Quizlet, where using software with better study schedules | like Anki can be a natural progression. | MichaelNolan wrote: | > (though I moved to SuperMemo about a year back) | | What pushed you to make the switch? Was it Incremental Reading, | or some other feature/reason? | nohaydeprobleme wrote: | My main motivation behind the switch was that I had too many | daily reviews of very old cards that I knew well in Anki, | after using the software very close to daily for several | years. I read that SuperMemo handled older reviews better, | and I was also optimistic at the time that the learning | schedule really was better than Anki's (as SuperMemo uses a | significantly later version of the algorithm that Anki is | based on for scheduling reviews). | | The software switch had its ups and downs. First, the | downsides: a significant one-time cost included the time | spent learning all the items from scratch, as the import of | cards from Anki to SuperMemo didn't preserve the repetition | history. Another one-time cost, though minor, was some | friction setting up the software (it took an abnormal number | of days to receive the activation code, which I eventually | received after a follow-up; maybe the company had a problem | with their system at the time). | | Long-term downsides include the lack of easy image occlusion | (aka, covering up parts of a labelled image and revealing | just one label in separate flashcards). If I studied | maps/diagrams with spaced repetition or anatomy like in my | high school biology class, this would be a dealbreaker | (though I suppose you could use keep using Anki along | SuperMemo). In my experience, it's far easier to occlude | images in Anki than in SuperMemo. Also, the Windows desktop | version I use doesn't have a mobile version, which is a very | significant downside. I'm now used to reviewing SuperMemo in | the evening or when I think it's a good time, via software | called Parallels to run a Windows virtual machine on a | MacBook, but there's a lot more friction to starting a review | session. To add to the friction, backups are a bit harder | (though I've made it easier by setting up a custom keyboard | shortcut to press the sequence of keys create a backup in a | folder in cloud storage). | | The main upside is that I do think (noting that I may have | confirmation bias) that the flashcard scheduling really is | effective and also more efficient. I no longer face | significant numbers of very old reviews, and I do | subjectively feel that I retain my cards better. | | To add objectivity on effectiveness for accuracy, according | to SuperMemo's data, I have a 97% retention rate on my French | cards which contain a lot of very old cards, though I | aggressively remake cards that become "leeches"; an 89% | retention rate on my Spanish cards, which have much more | newer cards; and a 93% retention rate on my | mathematics/sciences/miscellaneous readings cards. | Unfortunately, I didn't keep a records for Anki cards in | comparison, and there may be other factors behind increased | retention (if any) such as following better practices when | making new cards [1]. I wish I had numbers for time | efficiency, but I can confidently say that I don't dread | spending time reviewing old cards (though once again, there | may be some other factor). | | On SuperMemo's other features: I also did try the | "incremental reading" feature of SuperMemo, but ultimately, I | borrowed some of the principles and stuck to a personal | method of taking notes from different books, while switching | between books (instead of only focusing on one subject a day) | to help stay alert while studying the materials. There are | also other features of SuperMemo for sleep tracking and task | scheduling, but I didn't personally enjoy using them (I | personally found that sleep tracking didn't account well for | daylight savings, and I prefer other simple apps accessible | by mobile devices for scheduling and task tracking). | | To make a very long story short: I switched to try and reduce | time spent during reviews, but ended up spending a lot more | time setting up and getting used to the software. I didn't | really mind the fiddling that much, as spaced repetition | software was a sort-of hobby for me in the past, but for | other people who'd just like to learn, Anki provides a far | more direct way to try spaced repetition. | | SuperMemo is effective for me now, as I don't spend much time | at all fiddling with the software. But I'm not sure if I | would enthusiastically recommend the switch to other people | unless they're interested in spaced repetition software (and | thus don't mind fiddling with it), and they also have some | dissatisfaction with Anki in some way. In any case, with | either software, I've found my studies to be more effective | by treating spaced repetition as just a supplement to other | forms of study that require active problem solving. | | [1] Better practices included more strictly following | Wozniak's twenty rules here (also relevant for Anki users): | https://www.supermemo.com/en/blog/twenty-rules-of- | formulatin... | rahimnathwani wrote: | You're right that retrieval practice isn't optimal for all | types of knowledge. But not all spaced repetition systems are | flashcard systems. | | Just under a month ago, I read about 'math academy' here on HN. | One thing it does is sort of what it sounds like you envisage: | surfacing exercises relating to concepts you might be about to | forget. | kneebonian wrote: | I'll just throw out I've used Anki ever since I started it and | haven't failed a knowledge test since I started doing it. | Including passing my HAM test with only using Anki and the | questions for 72 hours. | bluquark wrote: | Using Anki for a 72-hour cram session is kind of missing the | point though. For me, the main benefit of Anki is to escape the | cram->forget cycle and learn things low-stress and for good. | kneebonian wrote: | I 100% agree that is the optimal way. But it can be useful to | memorize 300 questions and answers in 72 hours if you have | to. | rounakdatta wrote: | I'm surprised no one mentioned Memoet | (https://github.com/memoetapp/memoet). It is a much more modern | version of Anki - much more open algorithm, REST APIs and | universal interfaces and self-hosted control over one's data. | AlexErrant wrote: | Anki, imo, already has an open algorithm (that the user can | change via plugins), universal interfaces, and is "self- | hosted". My eyes perked up at REST api, but it doesn't look | like there's a centralized server that hosts shared cards, | which is where my mind went. | | I'm building https://github.com/AlexErrant/Pentive/ which is | basically Anki + Github + Reddit; people can optionally upload | their cards for others to download/fork, and the most popular | cards rise to the top. It's FLOSS, offline-first, supports | plugins and p2p syncing, and is very much a WIP. My proof of | concept is almost done though, which demos the critical | technologies in a secure way. | igloopan wrote: | I agree that Anki is likely less developer friendly but its | popularity does make up for that I feel, with ostensibly state | of the art SRS algorithms being published with Anki | implementations (https://github.com/open-spaced- | repetition/fsrs4anki) out of the box. Though as someone that's | solely used Anki for language learning, I do value the ability | to remember more words in less time more than ease of | development so it's not unlikely Memoet is a better choice for | other usecases. | bigbluesax wrote: | I actually really strugle to retain anything I learned with anki | and I was wondering if this affects anyone else. | | A prominent example is when I was working through a deck of | japanese hiragana and katakana, I was doing my cards at a | moderate pace every day, and I just kept mixing them up, even | when I was repeating them in short succession. After a few very | frustrating weeks of this i ditched anki and started trying to | write out the whole table from memory and checking for mistakes | after, this strategy proved so successful I only needed three | sessions for perfect recall. | | I used anki a few other times with similar results. I know the | idea of learning styles is disputed, but this app just doesn't | appear to work for me. | keiferski wrote: | It sounds like you didn't learn the information sufficiently | enough before making them into cards. Anki isn't good for | teaching you new things, it's good for remembering stuff that | you already know - or are at least familiar with. | nirav72 wrote: | This might be a good idea to refresh memory every so often. As an | IT guy , sometimes I'll mentally go blank when I trying to recall | some linux command option/switch or some sql query operation. | Especially when I've used that linux commend or wrote that | specific type of query 1000s of times throughout my career. This | has become more apparent as I've gotten older. (I'm 50 now). So | now I'm increasingly relying on search engines to quickly find | that info when I face those mental blocks. So I probably should | try anki style flash cards. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-18 23:00 UTC)