[HN Gopher] Leaving China
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Leaving China
        
       Author : jseliger
       Score  : 168 points
       Date   : 2023-03-19 18:02 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.persuasion.community)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.persuasion.community)
        
       | xiaolingxiao wrote:
       | Can other expats who has since left, or have decided to stay,
       | share their experience as well?
        
         | hayst4ck wrote:
         | I am not an expat, but I was considering spending several
         | months in China.
         | 
         | After Hong Kong, there was a strong message of "Americans
         | caused this," likewise after covid there was a strong message
         | of "this didn't start in China, this actually started in
         | America."
         | 
         | It wasn't just a message of "America is our enemy," but looking
         | at how the People in Hong Kong were robbed of due process from
         | an impartial justice system it was clear that if there was a
         | problem we would also not get due process.
         | 
         | The Canadians arrested without due process in response to
         | Huawei leaders being arrested was another story that says
         | "China might do bad things to you in response to things you
         | don't have control over."
         | 
         | As an American I felt it was made clear that we were the enemy
         | and we would not get due process.
         | 
         | I was planning to spend several months in China, but chose not
         | to because of Hong Kong. My choice was re-inforced because of
         | the covid response.
         | 
         | I am open to the idea that international media was being unfair
         | to China, but I had experiences which made me realize this was
         | not the case.
         | 
         | - I met a person who just got out of china. She was an early
         | 20s English teacher who didn't know why she was put in prison,
         | but spent a couple weeks in Chinese prison until the US state
         | department said 'give her back, now.' She figured she failed
         | some kind of political question she was asked or made a
         | statement about Taiwan she shouldn't have. She said she
         | probably would still be there if her boyfriend hadn't called
         | the US state department saying he hasn't heard from her and
         | didn't know what happened.
         | 
         | - Another woman I met on a plane said that the people who ran
         | the school she taught at threatened to revoke her visa trapping
         | her in China. She said she was leaving for "vacation" but was
         | not going to go back. She was also visibly shaken.
         | 
         | - A Hong Kong person I met broke down the way China was
         | destroying Hong Kong culture and acting like an imperial ruler.
         | 
         | - Hong Kong went from feeling like a lively place to feeling
         | like a dominated place. The energy left the city.
         | 
         | - Seeing the video of Triads in the train station made it clear
         | that the Chinese government was in bed with organized crime.
         | Seeing triads be the foot soldiers of the CPC was something I
         | had never seen before. It made it clear that if China wanted to
         | achieve a goal, it would use any method regardless of how right
         | or wrong it is. It was just one more element of "our legal
         | system is pretext, we will do what we want."
         | 
         | - I spent some time in China with a Chinese woman and she was
         | constantly "correcting" me about any implication that Hong Kong
         | or Taiwan was a country. It made me realize that I can't just
         | hide my beliefs, they will manifest in my language, and that
         | will put me at risk.
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | > "this didn't start in China, this actually started in
           | America."
           | 
           | How did the reasoning work here? Not sure if this speaks to
           | poor education, propaganda, something else, or all of the
           | above.
        
             | simonh wrote:
             | There's a conspiracy theory propagated in China that Covid
             | was a biological weapon spread in Wuhan by Americans
             | visiting during an international sporting event in late
             | 2019.
        
             | dumpster_fire wrote:
             | [dead]
        
             | elbigbad wrote:
             | Probably the same way conservative media portrays US
             | joblessness as starting from other countries and their
             | immigrants, and it's clear that people who consume that
             | media really buy into that way of thinking. People in echo
             | chambers are particularly vulnerable to this sort of
             | propaganda I expect.
        
               | nonethewiser wrote:
               | I get what you're saying. I haven't seen that example
               | from conservative media though. Most of the narratives I
               | see center around illegal immigration, drugs, drain on
               | social services, etc.
        
             | paganel wrote:
             | Based on organisations like the infamous NED [1].
             | 
             | [1] https://www.ned.org/region/asia/hong-kong-china-2021/
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | > Another woman I met on a plane said that the people who ran
           | the school she taught at threatened to revoke her visa
           | trapping her in China. She said she was leaving for
           | "vacation" but was not going to go back. She was also visibly
           | shaken.
           | 
           | I know someone working as an architect in China and
           | apparently his company holds onto his college degree. Hes
           | concerned he won't get it back if he doesn't remain on good
           | terms. I was told this is a common arrangement.
        
             | s1artibartfast wrote:
             | What does that mean? College degrees aren't like passports.
             | Can't you just order a new copy? I haven't seen my college
             | degree in 15 years
        
             | mschild wrote:
             | I'm not sure I understand this. How are they holding on to
             | his degree? A physical copy? Couldn't he just ask his
             | University for another one?
        
             | WheatMillington wrote:
             | This reads like it was written by someone cosplaying as an
             | adult. A college degree is not an irreplaceable piece of
             | paper to be guarded with your life - otherwise it would
             | live in a vault somewhere. You can trivially have the
             | certificate reprinted.
        
               | nonethewiser wrote:
               | Do you think I'm lying? Asking because the cosplaying
               | comment. Your reasoning is not lost on me but I see no
               | reason to suggest Im being dishonest.
               | 
               | If it's that simple he will be relieved to here it.
               | Frankly I'm not sure why it's such a big deal either.
        
         | baybal2 wrote:
         | I've been working in, and out of South China since 2009, and
         | have called it quit 2019, when it became clear the industry was
         | done for, and CoVID mess only reinforced my decision.
         | 
         | I never held any fraternal feelings with the country, even
         | though I am ethnic Chinese, nor I had any delusions about
         | making long term plans there.
         | 
         | In my years there, I kept seeing rose coloured glasses wearing
         | American expats. I met Tim Cook during his first travels to
         | China as CEO at some random event in Shenzhen, only to see him
         | regurgitate the official drivel.
         | 
         | Since around 2016, I kept seeing more and more Western high
         | flyers coming to official events there, seemingly trying to
         | network with locals, and only to see them freak out at that.
         | 
         | My regular conversation with them:
         | 
         | - it's a damn communist regime, do your business and get out
         | 
         | - no, it's different! there is no more communisms in China! no,
         | it's state capitalism! no, things will change! no, I have a
         | special plan from EY China expert!
         | 
         | Most of them lived there for 2-3 years, and got out just as I
         | told when the truth hit them. In the end, I outlived all of
         | them there.
         | 
         | China is a communist regime, though a very well doing for some
         | years.
        
           | chasil wrote:
           | You have a decisive level of bravery for your willingness to
           | say this.
           | 
           | I applaud you for your clarity on the country of your
           | ancestors. It is a shame.
        
             | MichaelZuo wrote:
             | I see comment chains touching on this topic in nearly every
             | post even tangentially related to China, and it's rarely
             | ever that the main issue is mentioned. So I'll write this
             | for the benefit of any passing reader with a similar
             | worldview.
             | 
             | In a country of 1.x billions it shouldn't be surprising
             | that there would be at least a few tens of millions of
             | hardcore, actual socialists, who genuinely believe in some
             | distant future communist utopia.
             | 
             | Even if the entire rest of the population were the most
             | perfect paragons of virtue imaginable, it's still likely
             | going to be the hardcore folks willing to fight to the
             | death en bloc that end up with the actual power. That's
             | just how the cookie crumbles in every country.
             | 
             | Whether it's ultra-Maoists in China, or ultra-Hindus in
             | India, or ultra-muslims in Islamic countries, ultra-
             | Orthodox Jews in Israel, etc..
             | 
             | The real question is whether or not the bulk of the
             | hardcore group can be enticed with enough potential rewards
             | to moderate their views.
             | 
             | Wealth
        
           | baybal2 wrote:
           | The fallacy of "reformed communism" hopers is that with
           | development came not their hoped reform, but even stronger
           | regime, and harder life.
           | 
           | Way more, many times more rich Chinese are fleeing China now,
           | when it reached some level of wealth, and industrialisation,
           | than back 10-15 years ago, when China was incomparably
           | poorer, and everyday life was incomparably harder.
           | 
           | All of that was easily predictable. You have a terrible
           | regime, you give it money, and power. It only becomes
           | stronger, and more terrible, not less.
           | 
           | Communism is irreformable.
        
         | yibg wrote:
         | I spent 3 years in China before Covid. Happened to be out of
         | the country during initial lockdown and that was that. My
         | experiences are pre Covid so things may be different now, I
         | don't know.
         | 
         | Pros:
         | 
         | - very vibrant, never bored even though when I went I didn't
         | know anyone really
         | 
         | - I was paid a Silicon Valley salary so high income compared to
         | the typical local. Can afford a very nice lifestyle
         | 
         | - due to demographics and being an "actual" expat, as opposed
         | to English teacher, was respected
         | 
         | Cons:
         | 
         | - general quality of life. Traffic, pollution, food and water
         | safety etc
         | 
         | - can be hard to make deep connection except with other expats.
         | Just different cultures and values.
         | 
         | - lack of freedom and censorship. Vpn needed for everything,
         | and even then doesn't always work. Certain topics are avoided
         | 
         | - there is a surface level fakeness that I personally really
         | dislike.
         | 
         | It's a fun place to be for a while when you have the income and
         | status. But for me at least not a place to be long term.
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | You were paid ~150k+ USD in China, from a Chinese employer?
        
             | dumpster_fire wrote:
             | [dead]
        
       | tiny_ta wrote:
       | It's so interesting to read this perspective since it drives home
       | "the grass is always greener.." for me. I've lived a pretty
       | charmed life in the US for the past few years (like the majority
       | of HN, I imagine) but I find myself longing to move to a country
       | with dense cities, affordable housing in the city center, great
       | public infrastructure and a modicum of agreement among the
       | citizens and China fits the bill pretty great for me. I
       | understand that it might come at the cost of some personal
       | freedom but I'm willing to pay that price for a great society in
       | return. But reading this makes me think this is part of "the
       | human condition" - the more time we spend in a bubble in a place,
       | the more we either become blind to it's shortcomings or become
       | overly rosy about a foreign place that would solve all our
       | problems.
       | 
       | As a sidenote, the author says he does not like his kids playing
       | "war" in Chinese playgrounds - I wonder how he will feel about
       | the active shooter drills that are now part of every kids life in
       | the US.
       | 
       | Note: I'm not Chinese.
        
         | nonethewiser wrote:
         | You should move to China and buy one of those affordable houses
         | in the city center.
        
         | nazka wrote:
         | I don't understand. Why not Europe?
         | 
         | There are so many great countries/cities in Europe for exactly
         | what you are looking for! And much more. You will avoid all the
         | negative points from China that someone listed on another
         | comment. While improving your life beyond work. 1-3 hours to so
         | many wide destinations from Paris to London, Amsterdam, Oslo,
         | Jerusalem... All while beyond guns you will have same to more
         | freedom. Less crime. On the health side unless you need the
         | best surgeon in the field, you will find overall better
         | healthcare across all level. Education is great to on part with
         | the best (for kids with countries like Norway or Sweden it's
         | definitely the best. Others are catching up). And I can go on
         | and on with cost of living compare to major US cities, the
         | variety of cultures, landscapes, way of life etc...
         | 
         | I think of Americans are easy to the idea to leave the US and
         | sacrifice some things, they will find a wide range of
         | interesting opportunities.
        
           | tiny_ta wrote:
           | Europe is definitely on my list! Some things like economic
           | conditions in the likes of UK and Germany give me pause, but
           | I would love to live in all these different places and
           | experience life there. Such a short life and so many places
           | to be (and such tedious immigration forms)!
        
         | The_Colonel wrote:
         | > I understand that it might come at the cost of some personal
         | freedom but I'm willing to pay that price for a great society
         | in return.
         | 
         | Does China provide that? Honest question, I don't know much
         | about it.
         | 
         | I visited Beijing once, and it ranks on the bottom of the
         | cities I'd like to live in. Of course, it's just my personal
         | impression and Beijing is obviously not representative of the
         | whole China.
        
         | askonomm wrote:
         | This hits home for me a lot. I've lived in Spain, Argentina and
         | Finland, all in hoping to fill whatever gap I thought it would,
         | whether that would be life quality, weather, culture or
         | whatever. But after the honeymoon period, the cracks started to
         | show at every place. I'm now back in my home country, Estonia,
         | which I (now) think is the best for me - but that creeping
         | feeling of something better being somewhere out there is hard
         | to shake, and still with me, even as I try to not think about
         | that.
        
           | shanebellone wrote:
           | Interesting. Estonia was my top pick in the EU.
           | 
           | In retrospect, were you searching or escaping?
        
           | tiny_ta wrote:
           | Thank you for sharing your experience. I'm Indian and I'm on
           | my third country I've lived in now. I'm beginning to think I
           | should learn to be optimistic and appreciative about wherever
           | I live than trying to find that perfect country to settle
           | down :)
        
           | chasil wrote:
           | There is no place, and no time, where people are better than
           | what you see before you right now.
           | 
           | Sometimes, the political system is better.
           | 
           | People? There is nothing new under the sun.
        
             | s1artibartfast wrote:
             | This a a strange postmodern take. All places and cultures
             | are really equal?
             | 
             | Maybe Im missing your point, but to take a hyperbolic
             | example, surely you wouldn't live in north Korea and say
             | "There is no place, and no time, where people are better
             | than what you see before you right now."
        
               | cutemonster wrote:
               | I'm afraid your example is not at all hyperbolic --
               | instead, such places and worse, are and have been common
               | throughout the ages ...
               | 
               | (Agreeing with you btw)
        
             | rdevsrex wrote:
             | I don't agree. Yes in one sense people are all the same.
             | But differences in each country really do matter. As do
             | cultural differences.
             | 
             | I grew up in the US but I've lived in South Africa for
             | nearly 10 years. I've also lived in Switzerland and Mexico.
             | 
             | So I've seen enough of a range of how people live to know
             | there are better and worse conditions. Maybe there is no
             | true perfect country or culture, but there are definitely
             | tradeoffs.
             | 
             | You might love the culture and hate the government, or love
             | the government but hate the culture.
             | 
             | Like I love how friendly South Africans are, but my God the
             | government is so corrupt. I love how the Swiss government
             | works, but Swiss people aren't known for being easy to make
             | friends with. God forbid you flush the toilet after 10pm.
             | 
             | So depending on what you are optimizing for, some places
             | really are better than others.
        
           | precompute wrote:
           | That's very interesting, what made you leave those countries?
           | Argentina likely has money issues, but the other two come
           | very "highly recommended" (high quality of life, law & order,
           | etc), especially Finland.
        
         | majormajor wrote:
         | In 2014 I worked with a company in Beijing for a few weeks. The
         | local engineers all had pretty long and packed subway commutes
         | from various outer developments, so my first guess would be
         | that "affordable housing in the city center" is long gone for
         | most major cities.
         | 
         | The surface-level infrastructure was interesting, it felt like
         | Los Angeles - much more than it did Manhattan or SF aboveground
         | - just blown up 3-to-5x. Wider streets with more lanes of cars,
         | big mega apartment complexes just all four times taller than
         | the common 5-story ones, etc.
        
           | livueta wrote:
           | +1, at least anecdotally, at least in T1 cities: I spent a
           | few months in Shanghai for work in 2018 and all of my local
           | colleagues had messed up housing situations of one flavor or
           | another. One guy lived alone in a shoebox but when he had a
           | free weekend, he'd take the train ~2h out to a smaller city
           | where his family lived in a decent house. There were also a
           | lot of complaints about apartment quality even/especially in
           | new construction.
           | 
           | The drive from central-ish Shanghai (Wujiaochang) to PVG was
           | mindblowing because of the scale and frequency of the
           | apartment megablocks ringing the city: identical enormous
           | tower after identical enormous tower, lining the wide (but at
           | the time oddly empty) thoroughfares. Felt like an alt opening
           | scene to a Judge Dredd movie.
        
             | majormajor wrote:
             | With the folks I was working with it wasn't "messed up" in
             | any way, it just was hardly any more relatively affordable
             | give local wages than most big cities in the US.
             | 
             | Some fun/awkward differences though. For instance, I had
             | imagined it would be easy to find a laundromat - I didn't
             | want to pay the hotel prices for cleaning. Ended up almost
             | accidentally offending the people I was asking - "why would
             | we need to go somewhere to do our laundry, we have laundry
             | machines, we aren't poor" - while since a lot of US cities
             | are older in the dense parts of town, laundry machines in-
             | unit were less common even for sometimes pretty pricey
             | places.
             | 
             | One of my big takeaways is that development is a lot easier
             | and cheaper than redevelopment. Building a ton of new
             | housing? Put in today's amenities! It might be crappy
             | quality even in "luxury" new construction (whether here or
             | there) but it's gonna be a lot easier than retrofitting
             | into a bunch of units from 50 years ago. Want a QR-
             | code/app-based payment system to take off? It's gonna be
             | easier if you're one of the first widespread options to
             | replace cash (like in China at the time) vs if you're
             | competing with ubiquitous credit/debit cards in the US.
             | Really illustrative of how things are path-dependent - and
             | why I'm bearish on "super apps" replacing what we already
             | have here.
        
               | nonethewiser wrote:
               | I used to think that way about WeChat but I don't
               | anymore. The reason stores use credit payment networks in
               | the West is because it's better. We have cash
               | transferring apps but we don't use them for a reason.
               | Meanwhile, China does not have the same type of payment
               | networks.
        
         | another_story wrote:
         | Ahh yes, China, with its brutal Darwinian rush hour on the
         | metro. The experience of needing to shove aside a 70 year old
         | women with her grocery trolley who doesn't understand you need
         | to wait until people get off before you get on.
         | 
         | That affordable downtown housing which is on par with costs in
         | Manhattan, where you'll hear someone renovating until 9pm every
         | night and smell the sewage gas wafting from bathroom drains
         | because what's a u-trap and inadequate underlying
         | infrastructure.
         | 
         | Agreement between citizens that if they can cheat the laowai,
         | or any mark really, or cut someone's line then they will.
         | 
         | Try living there for a bit. It's nice enough if you don't mind
         | seeing the sun a few weeks a year through the smog.
         | 
         | China is actually fun to live in, but it's not a good place to
         | live if you value your health, physical or mental. At least not
         | the cities.
        
           | winrid wrote:
           | The bathroom drain thing is so true. I documented that in a
           | bunch of cities all the way from Xinjiang to Beijing. I don't
           | get why they don't install u-traps. There were a couple of my
           | hotels that had them, but most did not. This includes
           | someone's home I stayed in.
           | 
           | When I asked a local about it they got very angry, like I was
           | insulting them. The need to save face in China is real. But I
           | get it, "who is this American who thinks they can tell us how
           | to do things?"
           | 
           | I didn't find the smog to be bad everywhere, though. Beijing
           | was pretty bad in the morning/early afternoon. But from what
           | I remember Chengdu was nice smog/weather wise.
        
         | lr4444lr wrote:
         | I dunno, man. Net migration numbers don't lie.
        
         | freitzkriesler2 wrote:
         | I've lived in China and I can tell you, you will NOT like China
         | especially for the reasons you've stated.
         | 
         | China has a ton of problems that aren't readily apparent unless
         | you are feet on the ground. The majority of the culture of
         | china is, "dog eat dog" in that you will be scammed and taken
         | advantage of unless you speak fluent Mandarin.
         | 
         | You will run into problems with excessive Chinese bureaucracy
         | both with the government and services you need. The only way to
         | break through is with a bribe.
         | 
         | Things we take for granted like food and product safety are
         | secondary.
         | 
         | In the first month, I got incredibly sick for a food born
         | parasite (this was from a good grocery store too nonetheless).
         | 
         | Don't ever eat from street vendors (google gutter oil).
         | 
         | You also run the risk of getting physically attacked when
         | relations with America are rough. I heard stories of a guy that
         | got jumped by a group of chinese men after Trump was elected.
         | He didn't even vote for him and the police did not care.
         | 
         | China is the type of place you visit, make a bunch of money,
         | and get out.
         | 
         | In all honesty, you'd be happier living in a 2nd or 3rd tier
         | Benelux or Dach town.
        
           | tiny_ta wrote:
           | Thank you for sharing your experience - I appreciate that a
           | lot of my views around China (and even DACH where I've also
           | considered moving to) may be too rosy. I will definitely
           | visit any place a few times before I move there!
        
           | auggierose wrote:
           | What is a Dach town?
        
             | kosmos1337 wrote:
             | DACH stands for Germany, Austria, Switzerland.
        
             | dEnigma wrote:
             | A town in Germany (D for "Deutschland"), Austria (A) or
             | Switzerland (CH).
             | 
             | Seems that term isn't common in English.
             | 
             | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-A-CH
             | 
             | https://www.statista.com/topics/4623/dach-
             | countries/#dossier...
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | There's a wonderful skit from Portlandia about a couple who
         | visit Spain and come back and everything is now a reflection of
         | what they saw there. They can't help but talk about it...
         | constantly.
         | 
         | I think it's hard to really "know" a place, and frankly your
         | experience anywhere will vary.
         | 
         | Granted sometimes people just need a change.
        
         | FpUser wrote:
         | >"I understand that it might come at the cost of some personal
         | freedom but I'm willing to pay that price for a great society
         | in return."
         | 
         | Fuck that. Our freedoms are already getting screwed by various
         | acts of governments. Personal freedom is the most valuable
         | thing for me.
        
         | jzb wrote:
         | Serious question, if you have to sacrifice personal freedom,
         | what does the great society look like you are willing to
         | sacrifice it for? What freedoms are you willing to give up for
         | what societal benefit?
         | 
         | I'm genuinely curious because every person defines personal
         | freedom differently. And great society is very subjective.
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | Im curious as well because everyone is an individual and no
           | one is a society. So who exactly are we sacrificing
           | individuality for?
        
           | thefounder wrote:
           | Some are selling their freedom quite cheap. It's really
           | nothing new/hard to imagine.
        
           | tiny_ta wrote:
           | I appreciate your question because I have spent a lot of time
           | in the past thinking about this :)
           | 
           | > I'm genuinely curious because every person defines personal
           | freedom differently. And great society is very subjective.
           | 
           | I couldn't agree more! I believe that all of us have to give
           | up some personal freedom if we want to live in a functional
           | society. I may want to blast music from my rooftop at 3AM but
           | I must curb that urge out of respect for the society I live
           | in. How much of this personal freedom we are willing to give
           | up is different for different people. On this spectrum, I
           | think I lie towards giving up more if it gives me a
           | comfortable society in return.
           | 
           | I am willing to mask up if it means that fewer people in my
           | vicinity may "possibly" get sick less. I am okay with video
           | cameras and facial recognition in public places if it means
           | less crime in my neighborhood. I am willing to pay more taxes
           | if it means public infrastructure can be improved and schools
           | can get better teachers. I might be wrong though, because
           | these things can clearly be taken to an extreme.
        
             | nonethewiser wrote:
             | Are you really giving up personal freedom if you're
             | consciously deciding not to do something out of
             | consideration for others?
             | 
             | Usually it becomes a problem because you are infringing on
             | someone else's personal freedom. So it's still about
             | maximizing personal freedom in that case.
        
             | claytongulick wrote:
             | I appreciate your perspective, because it's one that I've
             | so often found confounding.
             | 
             | > I think I lie towards giving up more if it gives me a
             | comfortable society in return
             | 
             | It seems like you are very practical minded, which I
             | appreciate.
             | 
             | I think the fundamental skepticism that those of us who
             | tend to be more "libertarian" minded is whether you're
             | actually getting value in return for giving up liberties.
             | 
             | > I am willing to mask up if it means that fewer people in
             | my vicinity may "possibly" get sick less.
             | 
             | I think this was the mentality of the majority of people
             | who supported universal masking, and I think it came from a
             | genuinely good place. The issue that I had with it was the
             | lack of evidence to support universal masking, and the
             | draconian implementation without regard to potential
             | negative consequences. It struck me at the time as being
             | the TSA of pandemic response, more theater than effective
             | intervention. Time and research seem to have borne this
             | out.
             | 
             | > I am okay with video cameras in public places if it means
             | less crime in my neighborhood.
             | 
             | Except they don't on their own [1], but they are an
             | incredible weapon and boost in power granted to the
             | surveillance state.
             | 
             | > I am willing to pay more taxes if it means public
             | infrastructure can be improved and schools can get better
             | teachers.
             | 
             | The relationship between taxes and education outcomes is
             | complex (at best) [2], and you need only live in the North
             | East for a short period of time, pay those exorbitant taxes
             | and drive 95 and the Jersey Turnpike to understand that
             | higher taxes don't necessarily translate to better
             | infrastructure.
             | 
             | Drive from New Mexico, through Texas, Louisiana,
             | Mississippi to Florida sometime and compare the roads and
             | bridges.
             | 
             | I've lived all over the U.S. and experienced the difference
             | between many states. They each have unique challenges, but
             | I can tell you one rule that's held true in all my travels:
             | granting more power and money to the government past a
             | certain point doesn't translate into a better quality of
             | life for the people.
             | 
             | [1] https://www.mtas.tennessee.edu/knowledgebase/there-
             | empirical...
             | 
             | [2] https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/01/21/a-c
             | onnec...
        
         | kurthr wrote:
         | I'd encourage you to study Mandarin for a year or so and look
         | into what the non-influencer set is saying about China. My
         | first trip to China was in 1999 and my last in 2019. That was a
         | time of amazing freedom and growth. Beijing went from bicycles
         | to cars to subways and everything was growing. It's not like
         | that now, youth unemployment is very high, foreigners are not
         | welcome, and you really can't imagine the political and
         | economic situation you're walking into. One simply does not
         | publicly discuss problems there without considering the
         | consequences.
         | 
         | Columbine was 1999. I think he'll be more surprised by the
         | level of political division and general impoliteness there is
         | in the US.
        
           | tiny_ta wrote:
           | Thank you for your balanced view! I will definitely learn the
           | language and visit the place a few times before I consider
           | moving anywhere :)
        
           | scrubs wrote:
           | I'd encourage everyone to read:
           | 
           | https://globalbrief.ca/2020/06/zeal-and-chinas-wolf-
           | warrior-...
           | 
           | This goes way further than most to explain "Chinese
           | characteristics" (my term usage not link's).
           | 
           | China is very complex and belies any simple summary. I
           | definitely think it's a vastly smarter state than Russia...
           | who by comparison it must now regard as a baby sitting
           | project.
        
         | dirtyid wrote:
         | >dense cities, affordable housing in the city center, great
         | public infrastructure and a modicum of agreement among the
         | citizens
         | 
         | ...
         | 
         | >China fits the bill
         | 
         | All those things may exist but sheer concentration of
         | population = QoL / "dynamism" still gets very uncomfortable and
         | cut throat. PRC pace = good cities with livable QoL mix rapidly
         | develop until they're not. Hence you get expat commends like
         | Chongqin reminds me of Shanghai in 2000s. On the otherhand,
         | plenty of big cities at varying degrees of development to
         | bounce around, but that's a very different life style.
        
         | slowmotiony wrote:
         | "As a sidenote, the author says he does not like his kids
         | playing "war" in Chinese playgrounds - I wonder how he will
         | feel about the active shooter drills that are now part of every
         | kids life in the US. Note: I'm not Chinese."
         | 
         | Well obviously, since if you were Chinese you'd know that kids
         | in China are doing drills to protect themselves against psychos
         | with knives who attack schools. Like actual grownups with
         | machetes randomly killing children. Those attacks are happening
         | all the time by the way.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | > pay that price for a great society in return
         | 
         | You're not just paying in your own freedoms. You're paying in
         | the freedoms of others, like the Muslims that the Chinese
         | government have decided aren't compatible with the "great
         | society" that you seek.
        
           | thefounder wrote:
           | There are worse places for muslims than China as far as human
           | rights are concerned. I feel the whole muslim issue in China
           | is just a pretext. Have we forgot about Saudi Arabia or
           | whatever mess is left in Afghanistan?
        
             | Waterluvian wrote:
             | Last week my six year old tried to justify his bad
             | behaviour because his little brother did something worse. I
             | didn't buy it, and I don't here either.
        
               | thefounder wrote:
               | Well, if you would keep signaling your six year old and
               | ignore the "deeds" of his little brother I would say you
               | are biased and have something against your six years old.
               | Also what made you punish the bad behaviour all of a
               | sudden?
               | 
               | It's not like China was a beacon of human rights until
               | "now". I don't think SA is really a little brother
               | either. They still behead people in public squares. The
               | whole "human rights" issue in China is really just a
               | pretext and use of U.S soft power to isolate China. But
               | "everyone" know that at stake is really the economic and
               | millitary rivality. The U.S couldn't really care less
               | about the muslims in China. Just look how much it cares
               | about women in Afghanistan. Let's stop pretending we are
               | little children. China is starting to influence our way
               | of life and we should push against that but I just hate
               | the B.S pretexts. It feels like propaganda and we hate
               | propaganda, don't we?
        
             | claytongulick wrote:
             | I'm trying to understand the point you're making.
             | 
             | Are you making the argument that because there are things
             | that are possibly worse, we should ignore the bad?
        
         | 908B64B197 wrote:
         | > but I find myself longing to move to a country with dense
         | cities, affordable housing in the city center, great public
         | infrastructure and a modicum of agreement among the citizens
         | and China fits the bill pretty great for me. I understand that
         | it might come at the cost of some personal freedom but I'm
         | willing to pay that price for a great society in return.
         | 
         | Hope you are white. If so, I'm certain you'll have a great
         | experience. You'll be shown the modernity and good side of
         | living under the regime, and probably made to believe they are
         | the rightful holders of the "Mandate of Heaven". Make sure to
         | stay in Han dominated areas, and don't document of film
         | anything that could make the regime lose face.
         | 
         | > Note: I'm not Chinese.
         | 
         | Why are you explicitly spelling it out? So we don't immediately
         | assume this is propaganda?
         | 
         | Don't worry. If they like you enough, you'll even get paid for
         | comments like these!
        
         | hayst4ck wrote:
         | Taiwan is everything that is good about China, with very little
         | of what is bad.
         | 
         | The drawback of Taiwan is that there isn't nearly the level of
         | "white monkey" opportunities and you aren't as exotic.
         | 
         | China is also more extreme. You will have more extreme positive
         | experiences and more extreme negative experiences.
        
       | jasonjei wrote:
       | I used to travel to China all the time for work during my first
       | job in 2008. Those times were super optimistic. Hong Kong was
       | filled with Chinese pride, and it seemed inevitable that China
       | would absorb Taiwan. China had just hosted the Olympics.
       | 
       | I visited Hong Kong late 2018 after many years of not having been
       | there. It was a very different place from the Hong Kong I had
       | visited in 2009-2011. The energy was a bit darker. It almost felt
       | like another Chinese city. I had even been to HK several times
       | when I was in middle school in Taiwan (I was born in America, but
       | was a "reverse import" to Taiwan) as well as a mandarin language
       | tutor during university, and was always amazed by the richness of
       | HK culture from fishing villages in Saikung to bustling life in
       | Tsim Tsa Tsui and in Central with relics of British colonialism.
       | Now many unique elements of HK life had disappeared.
       | 
       | Meanwhile, Taiwan's value to the Chinese diaspora can't be
       | understated--it's a bastion of a mandarin-speaking democracy, or
       | in software terms a hard fork of an alternate reality of what
       | China could have been. It has cultivated its own culture, and
       | retained elements of Chinese culture cancelled during the
       | cultural revolution. It has its own identity from the aboriginal
       | population, the settlers from the dynastic period, Japanese
       | colonization, and influences from the Republic of China refugees
       | (or occupiers, depending on your POV, post 1949 Chinese settlers)
       | and American forces. And since 2018, I've seen the Taiwanese
       | double down on their Taiwanese identity and pride, and in many
       | ways Taiwan is the envy of China (also literally).
       | 
       | If I were to live in Asia, it might have once included Hong Kong
       | because of its unique British history. Now I would probably live
       | in Taiwan and Japan.
       | 
       | Edit: Taiwan hasn't always been a democracy, and the path to
       | democracy hasn't been easy (just ask America). It's not perfect
       | like any other well-running democracy, but it's the closest
       | paragon we have in the Chinese diaspora. The presidency has
       | transitioned peacefully to different parties since the 1990s.
        
         | mytailorisrich wrote:
         | > _and it seemed inevitable that China would absorb Taiwan._
         | 
         | No, it's unrealistic to think the the ROC would ever
         | effectively surrender to the PRC however HK's reintegration was
         | managed.
        
           | bryanlarsen wrote:
           | Hong Kong was promised to have democracy, human rights and
           | access to China. If they had kept those promises, then I
           | believe many Taiwanese would have welcomed reunification.
        
         | coldtea wrote:
         | > _Meanwhile, Taiwan's value to the Chinese diaspora can't be
         | understated--it's a bastion of a mandarin-speaking democracy._
         | 
         | A bastion of democracy which has been a right wing dictatorship
         | from its inception until the 90s.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan)
        
           | daemoens wrote:
           | So it's still a bastion of democracy?
        
           | dragonwriter wrote:
           | > A bastion of democracy which has been a right wing
           | dictatorship from its inception until the 90s.
           | 
           | The 1990s being, well, _not now_ , the correct conjugation is
           | either "was" or "had been", not "has been".
           | 
           | Which relates directly to why its irrelevant.
        
           | seszett wrote:
           | The 90s are now thirty years ago, and Taiwan has undisputably
           | been a functioning democracy since then.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | hayst4ck wrote:
           | I watched a Taiwanese election in Taiwan. I observed their
           | polling stations. A Taiwanese citizen started a conversation
           | and educated me, an American, on democracy and elections.
           | 
           | This Taiwanese person told me that elections are for the
           | loser. If the loser does not believe in the validity of the
           | election, it serves no purpose.
           | 
           | That's why electronic voting machines are anti-thetical to
           | the purpose of an election. Electronic voting machines
           | exchange trust for a more efficient election. That is why
           | Taiwan does not use electronic voting machines.
           | 
           | That is a pretty impressive insight that was absent from my
           | American civic education. I was very impressed with the civic
           | education in Taiwan, and I was impressed with the average
           | level of education in Taipei.
           | 
           | My subjective experience as an American was that Democracy is
           | more healthy in Taiwan than it is in America.
        
             | scrubs wrote:
             | For the loser? That's like the mob's take on what practical
             | operational control means.
             | 
             | >My subjective experience as an American was that Democracy
             | is more healthy in Taiwan than it is in America.
             | 
             | Cause why?
        
             | Aperocky wrote:
             | > If the loser does not believe in the validity of the
             | election, it serves no purpose.
             | 
             | The idea seems correct, however, unsure how electronic
             | voting machine comes into the picture, perhaps only in a
             | mental sense, but people have shown that they will not
             | believe in the validity of the election regardless of the
             | evidence presented.
        
         | scrubs wrote:
         | Although off topic from the original post, would you entertain
         | this question? What's Taiwan's position on integration with
         | China? What does Taiwan want for itself? I'd like to hear more
         | about that minus American and Chinese input.
        
           | jasonjei wrote:
           | This is an extremely interesting question because I've heard
           | various viewpoints. The vast majority want to keep the
           | "technical debt" of this uneasy bridge to China--that is
           | trade and movement of people between the strait, and
           | maintaining the status quo of the "Republic of China"
           | government (controlling Taiwan) and PRC (controlling China or
           | "mainland").
           | 
           | Many Taiwanese don't want war, but they already are
           | functionally independent. The PRC has never governed in
           | Taiwan. The ROC, which governed China from 1912 to 1949,
           | governs Taiwan and its child islands.
           | 
           | Many young Taiwanese just want to be Taiwanese and left
           | alone, but the vast majority want to keep the status quo as
           | long as it's tenable (it's not, Xi Jinping has indicated a
           | timeline). The big question is how this might be possible
           | without poking the bear that resembles Pooh... It's obvious
           | to most Taiwanese that China won't keep its promises, since
           | it made clear violations of promises made to the HK people
           | and UK.
           | 
           | Recent elections have shown KMT party (pro-PRC relations, the
           | grandfather of the Republic of China government, and in
           | someways the father party of the Communists that forked from
           | KMT) gaining ground because people are afraid of war. Nobody
           | in Taiwan wants war, but as the saying goes, in order to have
           | peace, prepare for war.
        
             | scrubs wrote:
             | Well, if China invades it'll have even less incentive to
             | maintain anything remotely like pre-invasion. You gave HK
             | as the example. That was only paperwork to get in the front
             | door.
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | >Chinese diaspora
         | 
         | I had no idea how wide it is until a family member married
         | someone from Asia and he explained ot me that his family thinks
         | of themselves as ethnically Chinese, although they're totally
         | disconnected from China.
        
           | dumpster_fire wrote:
           | [dead]
        
         | dirtyid wrote:
         | >It almost felt like another Chinese city
         | 
         | ...
         | 
         | >If I were to live in Asia, it might have once included Hong
         | Kong because of its unique British history
         | 
         | OTOH this attitude is why PRC finally calibrating HK for PRC
         | nationals/one-way permits instead of privileged foreign expats
         | was long overdue. Mainlanders I know in HK find the new mix
         | PRC/HK mix more preferable than UK/HK, less visible
         | discrimination etc. Local nativism still exists but less overt
         | than pre NSL. Applies to the mainland as well - first exodus of
         | privileged discontent expats who thought they were
         | indispensable in the mid 2010s - only to be replaced by
         | qualified nationals. Think of it as PRC fixing their H1B
         | problem. Something many in tech have comparably aligned
         | opinions on.
        
       | maskedinvader wrote:
       | Can we at HN at-least refer to the author as immigrant as opposed
       | to expats? what's an expat anyways ? why does the western world
       | to get to make these tiers where they are expats but arabs,
       | asians, africans etc are all immigrants ?
        
         | jacooper wrote:
         | I think he is an expat, because he is writing from the
         | perspective of the west. Also an expat left because he/she
         | wanted to, not forced to.
        
         | SalmoShalazar wrote:
         | I don't think you can expect the HN crown to be anything but
         | western chauvinists. It's who we are.
        
         | panza wrote:
         | An expat is not an immigrant. It would be incorrect to call the
         | author - who is an expat - an immigrant.
        
           | vgchh wrote:
           | Resident Alien - I think that's how USCIS calls people who do
           | intend to stay but not immigrate
        
         | givemeethekeys wrote:
         | An immigrant hopes to settle down in the host country, have /
         | grow a family there, own property and even become a citizen. Of
         | course, if the host nation does not have a citizenship program
         | for foreigners, then everyone who isn't a citizen is an expat.
         | 
         | An expat hopes, even plans to move back to where they came
         | from. They're in their host nation for work reasons only
         | because, at least according to the expat, where they're from is
         | a "better" place than their host country.
        
           | paxys wrote:
           | The author has lived there for 20 years, married there, has
           | kids who go to local schools, yet calls himself an expat, and
           | everyone here seems to accept that as an obvious truth. At
           | some point people have to come to terms that this isn't about
           | some technical definition of the term but a deeper prejudice.
        
       | ren_engineer wrote:
       | >But in order to live everyday life, most people living in China
       | find it necessary to turn a blind eye until it affects them
       | directly. That became impossible during the Covid-19 pandemic,
       | when the force of China's technocracy was on full display
       | 
       | it's amazing how people were able to delude themselves for so
       | long, Tiananmen should have been enough to make people and
       | governments realize things weren't going to change
        
         | RedCondor wrote:
         | The Western narrative about Tiananmen is frankly detached from
         | reality.
         | 
         | Anyone who chooses to believe something like "It was Kent
         | State, but bigger and more evil!" is just projecting.
         | 
         | >Probably the most widely disseminated account appeared first
         | in the Hong Kong press: a Qinghua University student described
         | machine guns mowing down students in front of the Monument to
         | the People's Heroes in the middle of the square. The New York
         | Times gave this version prominent display on June 12, just a
         | week after the event, but no evidence was ever found to confirm
         | the account or verify the existence of the alleged witness.
         | Times reporter Nicholas Kristof challenged the report the next
         | day, in an article that ran on the bottom of an inside page;
         | the myth lived on. Student leader Wu'er Kaixi said he had seen
         | 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that
         | he left the square several hours before the events he described
         | allegedly occurred. Most of the hundreds of foreign journalists
         | that night, including me, were in other parts of the city or
         | were removed from the square so that they could not witness the
         | final chapter of the student story. Those who tried to remain
         | close filed dramatic accounts that, in some cases, buttressed
         | the myth of a student massacre.
         | 
         | https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananm...
         | 
         | The idea that it's "covered up" is also, likewise, nonsense:
         | 
         | >Beijing Municipality has checked and double-checked all the
         | figures from the Martial Law Command, the Public Security
         | Ministry, the Chinese Red Cross, all institutions of higher
         | education, and all major hospitals. These show that 241 people
         | died. They included 23 officers and soldiers from the martial
         | law troops and 218 civilians. The 23 military deaths included
         | 10 from the PLA and 13 from the People's Armed Police. The 218
         | civilians (Beijing residents, people from elsewhere, students,
         | and rioters) included 36 students from Beijing universities and
         | 15 people from outside Beijing.
         | 
         | https://redsails.org/another-view-of-tiananmen/
         | 
         | It's just understood differently than how Americans wish it was
         | understood. Probably because "heroes" like Liu Xiaobo said
         | things like:
         | 
         | >[It would take] 300 years of colonialism. In 100 years of
         | colonialism, Hong Kong has changed to what we see today. With
         | China being so big, of course it would require 300 years as a
         | colony for it to be able to transform into how Hong Kong is
         | today. I have my doubts as to whether 300 years would be
         | enough.
         | 
         | http://www.open.com.hk/old_version/1011p68.html
        
           | nebukhadnezzar wrote:
           | What do you win or get out of the attempts to rewrite
           | atrocities like they have never happened in history? What did
           | the victims that died that week do to you?
           | https://imgur.com/a/q8ZIS
        
             | RedCondor wrote:
             | I'm Latin American and very, very happy we have China as an
             | alternative to America's tyrannical Monroe Doctrine.
             | 
             | The demonization of China feels incredibly absurd, like
             | when someone wearing an exceedingly ugly outfit, lacking
             | self-awareness, tries to criticize someone else's fashion.
        
               | nebukhadnezzar wrote:
               | Full mask off now, who would want to live in a democracy
               | if you can live under the boot of an authoritarian
               | narcissistic personality cult.
        
               | RedCondor wrote:
               | I'm not gonna engage in some silly atrocity picture-
               | sharing exercise with some America enthusiast. The fact
               | that you think it's something that America could come out
               | ahead of China on is simply absurd.
        
           | meh8881 wrote:
           | Are you citing the Chinese government as the best source on
           | supposed Chinese government atrocities?
        
             | RedCondor wrote:
             | Absolutely.
             | 
             | If the accusation is "the Chinese government denies it!"
             | the best way to demonstrate the falsehood is by citing the
             | Chinese government not denying it.
             | 
             | It seems pretty straightforward.
        
               | letmevoteplease wrote:
               | That's a "limited hangout," like the US government
               | describing Abu Ghraib torture as "isolated incidents," or
               | the Rwandan state dismissing its genocide as "ethnic
               | clashes." It's the default response for any government
               | trying to absolve itself of an atrocity.
        
         | FpUser wrote:
         | Things do change over the time. And if you are so willing to
         | look back I am sure you'll find enough trash in a history of
         | your own country.
        
           | simonh wrote:
           | They do change, in mainland China they have devolved
           | considerably under Xi. I have Family over there, and a lot of
           | the optimism of a decade ago was already being squeezed out
           | of the country before the pandemic.
        
             | FpUser wrote:
             | Yes things devolved, and they might get better over the
             | time. Or not. Nobody knows.
        
           | ren_engineer wrote:
           | I mean change in the talking point at the time that if we
           | just kept throwing money at China they'd magically become a
           | democracy. As long as the CCP is in charge that's not
           | happening and should have been clear based off Tiananmen.
           | Allowing them into the WTO and continuing to trade with them
           | just made their power stronger. Going to be seen as a huge
           | blunder historically
        
       | shell0x wrote:
       | Lots of people used to go to China for work and could do pretty
       | much anything they want, but since Jinping took over it went
       | downhill fast.
       | 
       | Most people in the expat community I know went to Hong Kong and
       | Singapore instead for the following reasons: 1) Easy to do
       | business 2) Easy to get your money in and _out_. 3) Low taxes 4)
       | Central travel hubs in Asia 5) Less backwards mindset as these
       | cities feel more cosmopolitan and are interconnected with the
       | outside world
       | 
       | With HK having less and less freedom, Singapore is really the
       | only choice for foreigners to have a decent life quality in Asia.
       | Tokyo could potentially be an option too, but it's really hard to
       | live there due the very different structures in Japanese society
       | and taxes are pretty high.
        
       | ersiees wrote:
       | Why do we call people expats and not rich migrants or something
       | like that?
        
         | jimbob45 wrote:
         | Expats expect to come home at some point in their lives.
         | Emigrants (the word I think you were looking for) leave for
         | good.
         | 
         | https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/97835/difference...
        
           | carlmr wrote:
           | >Emigrants (the word I think you were looking for)
           | 
           | Emigrants leave and immigrants come. It's two sides of the
           | same coin. You can't emigrate without immigrating. Except if
           | you manage to become stateless and remain on international
           | territory.
           | 
           | Migrants is just the term without the direction. Which is
           | unnecessary if you're not talking about the country they
           | leave or move to.
        
           | hahaxdxd123 wrote:
           | If he had a family there, it seems to me like he was a
           | migrant until the political circumstances forced him out.
        
         | amrocha wrote:
         | Because US and EU citizens think that "immigrant" is a dirty
         | word for people from poor countries.
         | 
         | To all the other people talking about intent to settle or not:
         | read the post. The author lived in China for 20 years and built
         | a family there. They're not an "expat" under any technical
         | definition of the word.
        
           | lmm wrote:
           | > To all the other people talking about intent to settle or
           | not: read the post. The author lived in China for 20 years
           | and built a family there. They're not an "expat" under any
           | technical definition of the word.
           | 
           | And yet he's leaving. He calls the US "home". So evidently he
           | was an expat.
        
         | varjag wrote:
         | Expat == anglo work migrant
        
         | 908B64B197 wrote:
         | There's a legal distinction. At least in America.
         | 
         | An immigrant has an intent to settle, an expat doesn't. In
         | America, one could theoretically lose work authorization should
         | he refer or present himself as an immigrant.
        
           | cutemonster wrote:
           | That's what I've read, too, i.e. intent to settle, or not.
           | 
           | Maybe wanting to move forever (i.e. migrant) is more common,
           | if one is from a poorer country, which could explain why some
           | others here thought that "immigrant" implied "poor and less
           | educated".
        
         | nonethewiser wrote:
         | Well, many arent rich for starters
        
         | favaq wrote:
         | Immigrants detract from an economy, expats add to an economy.
        
           | varjag wrote:
           | You sure your ESL class is a bigger contribution to a host
           | economy than a skilled welder?
        
             | favaq wrote:
             | China is not as stupid as the West, if they thought you
             | weren't contributing they'd kick you in the butt back to
             | the US.
        
         | mr90210 wrote:
         | - Basketball players are athletes - Not all athletes are
         | basketball players
        
         | hayst4ck wrote:
         | While there are very jaded views about cultural superiority and
         | other things like that. I think the truth is probably less
         | cynical.
         | 
         | I can move to japan and marry a Japanese wife, work for a
         | Japanese company, pay Japanese taxes, and speak fluent
         | Japanese, but I will _never_ be Japanese because my skin is
         | white.
         | 
         | People can move to America, and as long as you speak English
         | without an accent, there is an assumption that you are
         | American.
         | 
         | If the place you move will assimilate you, then I would call
         | that migrancy. If the place you move will never accept you,
         | then I would call that ex-patriotism.
         | 
         | People who move to civil societies migrate, people who move to
         | ethnic societies become ex-patriots.
         | 
         | I strongly recommend reading this:
         | https://www.amacad.org/publication/what-does-it-mean-be-amer...
         | 
         | It really puts into perspective conservatism and liberalism by
         | showing their contextual effects on immigration.
        
         | dariosalvi78 wrote:
         | that's what migrants who are not poor like to call themselves
        
       | paxys wrote:
       | TL;DR
       | 
       | 2000 - The government is kidnapping people from their beds in the
       | middle of the night but that's a minor inconvenience. I'll just
       | shut up and enjoy the economic gains. China is the best!
       | 
       | 2022 - I can't believe the government is coming for _my_ money
       | and lifestyle. The tyranny was only supposed to affect the other
       | people.
        
       | tomohelix wrote:
       | What I find ironic is that as businesses leave China, they move
       | into the exact same type of culture in Vietnam and India. Vietnam
       | is basically a mini China and India is trending towards the same
       | authoritarian regime that most people find distasteful.
       | 
       | The entire western world is so addicted to cheap labor I don't
       | know what would happen when there is no more cheap labor to be
       | found. There will be a huge social disruption when everyone
       | everywhere in the world demands 100k salary a year with social
       | benefits. That or AGIs come out and we get a disruption on the
       | same scale.
       | 
       | Fun fact, Vietnam is moving from 5 days work week to 6 days work
       | week while the rest of us are demanding 4 days work week here in
       | the US.
        
         | web3-is-a-scam wrote:
         | And many of the Vietnamese factories are owned by China.
        
         | onos wrote:
         | I don't believe the average western person would care at all if
         | they could afford fewer cheap products. Corporate profits would
         | certainly go down.
        
           | _-david-_ wrote:
           | >I don't believe the average western person would care at all
           | if they could afford fewer cheap products
           | 
           | I don't think this is the case. The average person wants a
           | lot of things for cheap. Also, more expensive items like
           | computers and phones would increase in price. People like
           | having the newest phones, but might be priced out of it if it
           | increased.
        
         | FpUser wrote:
         | >"The entire western world is so addicted to cheap labor "
         | 
         | This is the only thing that allows rich to get richer while
         | still keeping peasants under the boiling point. Without cheap
         | labor living standard in developed countries would drop like a
         | rock. What comes after nobody knows.
        
         | muyuu wrote:
         | India perhaps, in the long term, could challenge the US
         | directly - but the idea that Vietnam or Thailand would openly
         | challenge the USA in a hot conflict is laughable
         | 
         | culture is not the reason these people are leaving China, but
         | an open hostility towards foreigners during recent years that
         | is creating a very difficult position for expats living there
        
           | tomohelix wrote:
           | Let say China and the US come into open conflict and everyone
           | is forced to choose a side, which side do you think Vietnam
           | will pick?
           | 
           | China and Vietnam share a long history and culture. They are
           | also right next to each other and have the same government
           | type. Vietnam has openly showed their desire to work with
           | China at the cost of the US. They sent some top diplomats to
           | China right after the US diplomats came to visit them. That
           | is pretty clear to me which country they prefer more.
           | 
           | Investing in Vietnam is basically the same thing as investing
           | in China in the past. It will end the same way, with a
           | strengthened opponent in Asia.
        
             | partiallypro wrote:
             | A vast majority of Vietnamese view China in a worse light
             | than the US, and China and Vietnam have recently had
             | quarrels over the South China Sea. They share a lot of
             | history...and some of that history includes China invading
             | Vietnam several times. I wouldn't count on Vietnam siding
             | with China in a global conflict.
        
         | croutonwagon wrote:
         | Having traveled to Vietnam AND being a bit of a history buff,
         | especially on US war history (and theres a "bit" of an
         | intersection there).
         | 
         | Can you explain how? They are a communist government sure and
         | to get fairly large as a private company you do have to cut the
         | government in (ie: Vin company, Viettel, Sunworld etc) but they
         | do appear to be much less repressive and much more open than
         | say a china. Especially socially.
        
           | arroz wrote:
           | China was also much more open and less repressive 10-20 years
           | ago
        
           | tomohelix wrote:
           | I think for Vietnam, it is more that they couldn't afford to
           | be repressive, not that they don't want to.
           | 
           | They are still relatively underdeveloped. Cracking down too
           | hard on dissidents would hurt their FDI from places like the
           | US. Not to mention they probably don't have the money and
           | manpower to spare on that. China was the same when they were
           | at the stage Vietnam is in now. And it is very likely Vietnam
           | will do what China is doing now soon enough.
           | 
           | I have been to Vietnam too and I think for the time I stayed
           | there, I got to experience a pretty authentic feel for their
           | political and cultural systems. And all it reminds me of is
           | China, a decade or two ago.
        
             | croutonwagon wrote:
             | Thats fair. I have never been to China but have worked witb
             | folks that have. They have to take some....extra
             | precautions traveling there.
             | 
             | Vietnam seems much more open. Their internet is largely
             | open and accessible. Even easy to register sims. They have
             | no quarantine or vaccine requirements for entry or visa
             | etc.
             | 
             | All in all much more open and light. Similarly in good
             | company they would be fairly open about the government and
             | problems etc.
             | 
             | It definately isnt on the same level of freedom as America
             | but definitely didnt seem as repressive as china and i
             | didnt see the will there to move that way. In fact they
             | seem like they wanted to remain open for the financial
             | benefits of doing business in the west.
        
         | inconceivable wrote:
         | indeed. vietnam is run by the communist party of vietnam.
         | remember, they won the war. that's why there is no south
         | vietnam and north vietnam anymore (unlike korea). there is no
         | free speech. there is no rule of law. there is no free market.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Vietnam
         | 
         | i wonder how long it will take before we start hearing "i hate
         | the VCP but i love vietnamese people/culture". probably when
         | they get powerful enough to challenge the regional US interest
         | in anything significant.
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | Do you see people endorsing the VCP now? Observing that
           | they're better than the CCP doesn't count.
        
             | inconceivable wrote:
             | yes, i do. every serious discussion i've heard or article
             | i've read about near-shoring and friend-shoring includes
             | vietnam.
             | 
             | chinese companies also operate factories in vietnam, that's
             | another aspect people just kind of gloss over.
        
               | nonethewiser wrote:
               | Again, that sounds like "better than China" and not a
               | direct endorsement of the Vietnamese communist party. We
               | are talking about global trade here - the proponents
               | aren't rooting for communism.
        
           | DiscourseFan wrote:
           | The US and Vietnam are very strong allies now, its unlikely
           | that will ever happen.
        
             | tomohelix wrote:
             | I don't think we have an alliance with Vietnam. AFAIK,
             | there is no US base or military agreement or anything
             | indicating a higher relationship than trade partner.
             | 
             | In fact, a few times DC sent some diplomats to Vietnam, the
             | govt over there responded by sending their diplomats to
             | China. Basically saying they prefer China over the US. It
             | makes sense to them since China is closer and have higher
             | trade value than the US. But because of that I don't see
             | how Vietnam can be a "strong ally" to the US.
             | 
             | Can you explain more or cite your sources?
        
           | arroz wrote:
           | Only china and India will ever really be able to challenge
           | the US
           | 
           | Big countries with big population
           | 
           | Maybe Nigeria and Indonesia too, but it wouldn't happen this
           | century
        
           | realusername wrote:
           | Unlike China it's not like they can operate in a closed
           | environment independently though, they need the outside world
        
             | inconceivable wrote:
             | i'm pretty sure you just made that up on the spot.
             | 
             | china imports huge amounts of everything critical to
             | manufacturing and food.
             | 
             | https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/CHN/Ye
             | a...
        
             | xtian wrote:
             | China needs the outside world, too.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
        
         | ren_engineer wrote:
         | >What I find ironic is that as businesses leave China, they
         | move into the exact same type of culture in Vietnam and India
         | 
         | most of those are just Chinese shell companies or doing final
         | assembly on parts made in China to get around sanctions and as
         | a PR stunt by big companies to appease DC by claiming they are
         | moving out of China
        
         | toomuchtodo wrote:
         | The world will adapt when labor becomes scarce, it will have no
         | other choice. The more scarce labor is, the more pricing power
         | it has.
         | 
         | Arguing over "what if AGI" is like arguing about nuclear war
         | and winter. It might happen, but no plans you form for it will
         | survive contact with reality, so there is very little value in
         | spending cycles on optimizing for it.
        
           | foobiekr wrote:
           | Labor isn't really going to become scarce this century.
           | Nigeria, etc.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | vidarh wrote:
             | Fertility rates are dropping across Africa too, and while
             | the growth will continue for a few more decades, maybe
             | until the end of the century, labour will increasingly be
             | scarce _where we need it_. There 'll be significant
             | political and social upheaval while countries deal with
             | figuring out how to compete for immigrants.
        
           | cute_boi wrote:
           | There will always be poor and they will be exploited. I guess
           | nature is brutal to keep everyone happy.
        
           | politelemon wrote:
           | I have a cynical view (sorry) that labor will always be cheap
           | somewhere. It's part of the globalization machine, there will
           | always be a decline somewhere, and if there isn't, one will
           | be created.
        
             | akira2501 wrote:
             | This view seems inconsistent. Artificial manipulation is
             | not sustainable in the long term. The ability to
             | continually create conditions that lead to cheap labor is
             | limited and will eventually fail.
        
               | auggierose wrote:
               | With AI+capital on the manipulating side I am not sure
               | there are any limits.
        
               | layer8 wrote:
               | On the contrary, it seems that increase of income
               | inequality is a natural trend.
        
               | nonethewiser wrote:
               | What artificial manipulation?
        
             | flextheruler wrote:
             | I'm not sure it's globalization. There will always be rich
             | countries and poorer countries. Like there will always be
             | poor people and rich people. The gap may and should shrink
             | between the two but not vanish.
        
               | nonethewiser wrote:
               | And if there is not, we either have global poverty or a
               | tremendous amount of force applied to the distribution of
               | wealth.
        
             | abstractbeliefs wrote:
             | China's Belt and Road Initiative suggests that they view
             | the under-developed Middle East and African nations to be
             | the next in line, the same as the US viewed China as a
             | source of cheap labour.
             | 
             | The party has been making deep investments into the regions
             | and is developing significant political and social capital
             | at the same time that the West is retreating from them,
             | cutting foreign aid, etc.
        
               | nonethewiser wrote:
               | > China's Belt and Road Initiative suggests that they
               | view the under-developed Middle East and African nations
               | to be the next in line, the same as the US viewed China
               | as a
               | 
               | I think it's more "want" than "see." They might see
               | Vietnam as next in line but outsourcing to ME and Africa
               | suit their interests better.
        
         | Krasnol wrote:
         | It's not as much about "cheap work" but about "cheaper work"
         | and there will always be cheaper work somewhere.
        
         | mr90210 wrote:
         | One could argue that there is great value on being able to
         | operate in different countries rather than centralize
         | operations or manufacture in a single country.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-03-19 23:00 UTC)