[HN Gopher] The FTC wants to ban tough-to-cancel subscriptions ___________________________________________________________________ The FTC wants to ban tough-to-cancel subscriptions Author : elashri Score : 655 points Date : 2023-03-23 13:33 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.theverge.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.theverge.com) | whydoineedthis wrote: | But those unused gym subscriptions subsidize the gym membership i | do use. Please don't take that stimulus away. | PaulHoule wrote: | I got the run-around one time when I tried to cancel my | membership at Planet Fatness. After my evil twin got me in | trouble at the gym I made sure to bring along my 6'3'' son and my | 300 pound probably-autistic and foul smelling friend (also | offended by my evil twin) for backup and had no trouble canceling | "our" membership. | insane_dreamer wrote: | Also the NYT! You should be able to cancel your subscription | online. | dangwhy wrote: | I there a law preventing me from canceling recurring | subscriptions on my credit card? | | Why does my bank want me to write them some letter and create a | case which they may or maynot look into. | | Merely changing the card number wont work because bank updates | vendors with the new card. I've asked but they they _have_ to | update vendors, i don 't understand why though. | ModernMech wrote: | Nope. Use Discovercard, I've used them to cancel services for | me. All you have to do is say you tried yourself and then | they'll close your account, and open a new one. It's not enough | for them to change your number, as the old number will still | work. Problem is it will cancel every autopay connected to that | card, so it's a nuclear option. | drewg123 wrote: | What does that do to your credit score? I seem to recall that | closing and opening cards can both lower you score.. | ModernMech wrote: | No impact. The thing that would lower your score would be | if it resets the account lifetime. But every time I've done | it, the account lifetime has been the same, and there are | no inquiries on my account, so it seems like Discover has a | way to do it where it doesn't impact your credit. | pimterry wrote: | > I there a law preventing me from canceling recurring | subscriptions on my credit card? | | No, but there may be a contractual agreement between you and a | provider where you have promised to pay for a service, and | merely 'not paying' is not sufficient to cancel that. This | makes far more sense in a non-digital world though, where you | might pay for expensive services after the fact, rather than in | advance. | | In practice, most digital services will happily cancel | themselves if you do just block upfront transactions. Many | modern financial services/neobanks I've used have some kind of | built-in functionality for this, even paypal has a page where | you can manage & cancel all current subscriptions directly, | blocking all future payments: | https://www.paypal.com/myaccount/autopay/. | | > Merely changing the card number wont work because bank | updates vendors with the new card. I've asked but they they | have to update vendors, i don't understand why though. | | I believe it's because the 'card details' part is effectively a | fiction for e-commerce. When you subscribe, the payment | provider uses your card details to get a persistent token, | which they can use to authorize future payments, and then they | throw away the card details entirely. They just use the token | alone to authorize future charges. | | That token is somewhat independent of the specific card, by | design, as unlike card details this means it can't really be | stolen or leaked (it's only authorized for certain purchases | from that one vendor) and it means all your normal ongoing | payments don't break in the common case where you _do_ want | payments to continue when your card is replaced. Bits About | Money has some more background on this here: | https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/improving-cards-under... | dangwhy wrote: | > but there may be a contractual agreement between you and a | provider | | Yes i understand my obligation to the vendor but why is the | bank enforcing that ? | willcipriano wrote: | The capital class has an easier time emphasizing with one | of it's own over it's customers. | pimterry wrote: | That's your bank's (bad) choice I'm afraid - it's certainly | not a requirement. | | Revolut for example will let you see & block all | subscriptions directly from the app: | https://www.revolut.com/subscriptions/. In the UK, it's a | legal requirement that all banks let customers block any | recurring card payments on request (at least via | phone/email/letter) with no questions asked, as long as you | ask at least a day before the next payment: | https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and- | money/banking/sto... | whiterace1488 wrote: | Why not? You don't want your bank to honour eg your | electricity payments that you authorised? Or do you want | your bank to cherry pick the transactions (you've already | authorised) to honour? | zo1 wrote: | In some countries, it's legislated and the banks are | obligated to treat these things a certain way. | dangwhy wrote: | Is it the case in US? I remember looking but couldn't | find anything but i was also not sure what exactly i was | searching for. | JohnFen wrote: | > Merely changing the card number wont work because bank | updates vendors with the new card. I've asked but they they | have to update vendors, i don't understand why though. | | I wish my bank had to do that. It would make my life a whole | lot easier sometimes. | yamtaddle wrote: | > Merely changing the card number wont work because bank | updates vendors with the new card. I've asked but they they | have to update vendors, i don't understand why though. | | Do they? My bank recently decided to send me a new CC for no | clear reason (old one had like two years left to expiry) and | without my asking for it, and it's been a huge pain in the ass | because seemingly _nothing_ updated automatically. | tzs wrote: | > Merely changing the card number wont work because bank | updates vendors with the new card. I've asked but they they | have to update vendors, i don't understand why though. | | They update vendors because most people who get a replacement | card with a new number have way more subscriptions that they | want to keep going than they have subscriptions that they want | to drop but for which the procedure for cancelling was too | complicated to time consumers. | MrStonedOne wrote: | [dead] | PaulHoule wrote: | Credit card companies should have special handling for recurring | billing. You should just be able to tell them "I don't want to | pay this bill anymore" and put a stop to it without having to get | a new card and a new number. | jabbany wrote: | The problem is that with credit cards, recurring bills aren't | "special" compared to normal purchases. | | This is different from digital-native payment systems like | PayPal which do have (albeit also riddled with dark patterns) a | way for you to de-authorize recurring bills from a vendor, at | which point they need to wait for you to initiate a payment | instead. | unethical_ban wrote: | I'm not sure I agree. I can't recall specifics but back in | the day a trick to get out of these was to report a card lost | or stolen so you'd get a new number. But some banks now allow | recurring charges to continue on the new number for | "convenience" reasons. | | Therefore you need to use a throwaway or cancel the card. | | I got a card from X1 and am using it solely for my recurring | services, since you can create unlimited virtual numbers and | put price caps/age limits on them. | jabbany wrote: | That's the issue. Cards generally don't let you control | billing "by-vendor" or "by-billing-series". | | As for the "allow recurring charges to continue on the new | number", none of my banks allow this (I know because I had | my internet bill lapse once after an old card expired and | subsequently got declined. The number didn't even change, | only the expiration and CVV). I don't know how it works, | but if I had to guess, banks get to decide whether a charge | goes through and they could probably let you pick by vendor | but probably aren't incentivized to do this. | PaulHoule wrote: | (1) the government could make them or (2) it's a feature | which could help attract and retain customers. Credit | cards a a highly competitive business. | | Larger picture, we could really use a reformed payment | system (government demands it) that address many | inefficiencies of the system so that banks would have | less wriggle room to claim the high fees they do. If | there was less fraud and fewer chargebacks the banks | could charge lower fees, as it is they con't have a lot | of motive to crack down because they can make us all pay | for it. | PaulHoule wrote: | They should change the system so it is. They introduced chip | cards to improve the system and they can introduce this | change too. | jabbany wrote: | They should, but it's the businesses that pay the fees to | the payment processors and not the consumers, so... | rrrrrrrrrrrryan wrote: | I'd sign up for a new credit card just for this feature alone. | benced wrote: | Note that this does not nullify your legal contract. | gpm wrote: | Sure, but your credit card company should be paying people | who you direct them to, not paying people who claim that you | owe them money. | PaulHoule wrote: | The credit company should write it into their contract so | that it does. The credit card company should send a | notification that you cut them off as soon as it happens. | nijave wrote: | Chase Bank (in the US) will list who has stored your card data | and whether it's for recurring payments but unfortunately don't | offer the option to disable/remove them | dikaio wrote: | How about the tuff to cancel WSJ? | UniverseHacker wrote: | These things are insane. I tried to cancel a month-to-month gym | membership from a small local gym, and they told me | "cancellations become effective on the 1st of the following | month" and "require two months advance notice" thereby | effectively charging me for three additional months after I gave | notice. Apparently, this was all in the agreement I signed, | although it was written so unclear, that nobody would even | suspect this is how they interpret it. | | I told them if you don't cancel it effective _right now_ I am | posting this dishonest predatory practice on every social media | and review site in town, as well as telling all of my friends I | met in here what you are doing, and asking them to please quit in | protest. I 'll also be doing a credit card chargeback, and a | small claims court case to recover the time it takes me to deal | with all of this. I will also take action to recover my back | membership fees, because they repeatedly failed to maintain | equipment in a usable condition, so I didn't get what I paid for. | They did concede, and canceled it immediately. | bob1029 wrote: | This is why I always prepay for my gym membership up-front and | do not enter into any agreement. There are a few places that do | this. Last one I went to, I prepaid for 90 days. I confirmed | they weren't even storing my payment information because I had | to provide it again to renew the next quarter. | | The best part of this is that when you decide you are done, you | simply do nothing and its all over. Sure, you will get some | marketing text spam for a few weeks but that's about it. | booi wrote: | There's also the added benefit of being able to take | advantage of "new memeber" offers | Waterluvian wrote: | They prey on people who don't want to rock the boat, don't know | that they can try to rock the boat, or are just too busy for | this absolute nonsense. | | The leadership of any company that does anything like this | should be _very consciously aware_ that they 're mediocre | leftovers of the professional world. Real leaders of real | companies don't have to be predatory. It is a screaming | confession of incompetence. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | > Real leaders of real companies don't have to be predatory. | It is a screaming confession of incompetence. | | There's a certain toxic element of business culture that | preaches dominance as a virtuous thing, ether overtly, or | through dubious terminology/beliefs in ideas like "alpha | males." It argues that if you aren't dominating someone, then | they necessarily must be dominating you in this interaction. | | It is an extremely reductionistic view that has trickled down | into certain parts of Weird Internet, too. | prawn wrote: | I imagine there are consultants that go around to gyms | (especially chains) and say "We've got x things that are | trivial to implement and will guarantee you make $123 more | per customer on average. Cost for our analysis and | recommendations is $12,345 with an assurance that you will | make this back in the first 6 months." And one of the things | is adding a paragraph to the sign up terms. | | It's a bit like the toothpaste consultant story. | ClumsyPilot wrote: | > Real leaders of real companies don't have to be predatory | | I dont think it works as your described. Amazon is plenty | predatory. | | What happens is a company tries to see what it can get away | with. If they don't get in legal trouble, and customers don't | abandon them in droves, then other companies start doing the | same. It becomes industry standard. | Waterluvian wrote: | You might be right. Though I think this is a cousin of "I'm | just following orders." Too many people don't speak up. Is | there nobody who feels embarrassed that this is what | they're a part of? | | "Hey dad, what did you do at work today?" | | "I worked with some lawyers to make an indecipherable | contract so that we can extract extra money for a service | someone doesn't want." | | I guess the answer is some mix of "make the org structure | so complex that everyone can feel innocent because no one | person is pulling the trigger" (I don't buy it, that just | means incompetent managers) plus a heaping scoop of | cognitive dissonance. | daemedeor wrote: | There's two layers to it. | | With a sufficiently large enough org, you can build it in | discrete enough parts (assuming it's a building something | based) that only the one who creates the final part is | the one who knows what the ultimate goal is or the one | who pulls the trigger. These people are also high enough | to be inured to any effects of their decision. The second | layer is even if you can see where it's going and you do | care, is it worth it to speak up and get fired? I know | whistleblowers are meant to be protected (speaking only | for the US) but with at-will employment and certain | conditions that favor employers, how do you know they | won't cycle in someone who will do it anyway? | myaccountonhn wrote: | My experience is that they somehow delusion themselves | into thinking they are doing a good thing and providing a | good service. | knodi123 wrote: | such a depressingly common trope. | | them: "Sorry, there's nothing I can do, I simply can't help | you!" | | customer: "I'll be really annoying." | | them: "I figured out how to help you!" | themitigating wrote: | This is exactly how most people operate. Reactive instead of | proactive. | phil21 wrote: | > I'll also be doing a credit card chargeback | | Maybe you would since it's a local gym, but if it's a national | chain credit card companies won't even let you initiate the | chargeback whatsoever. | | I had to go so far as to completely cancel my Amex account to | get Lifestyle Fitness to stop billing me. American Express | utterly refused to either chargeback, or deny future billings. | To the point a new card number issued didn't even fix it. I was | quite happy to sign a waiver that I'd take all liability. | | This was after moving states, calling to cancel, and them | saying I needed to fly in to cancel in person. Outright scam | that the banks help enable. | tibbon wrote: | I wonder why Amex plays ball with them? They are normally | really firm about their chargebacks | dangwhy wrote: | > Outright scam that the banks help enable. | | I think first logical step is to legislate banks from | enabling this. That should cover most of the problem without | a wide ranging laws. | denimnerd42 wrote: | my amex processed my chargeback for gold's gym just fine. | They said it was a no obligation free trial I could cancel at | any time and then when I called to cancel before the first | bill they said no, you have to come once a week for that to | be true..? | bombcar wrote: | A chargeback is distinct from a "never let this company | charge me again" - the latter some places can't do. | markus_zhang wrote: | We should have a github repo for these scamming activities. | louison11 wrote: | The opposite happened to my partner here in Portugal. She | signed up to a gym ($100/month), and they literally forgot to | start charging the account until 5 months later. Everything | tends to be so inefficient here. I guess at least in this case | the inefficiency worked in our favor. Now let's hope they won't | take 5 months to stop charging when we cancel ;-) | cloverTiger88 wrote: | honestly there will be a delay from the government taking | action on smaller local gyms too so I feel like there should be | a way to submit the businesses for inspection at least to | threaten them to improve their policies | markus_zhang wrote: | I'm thinking as an added protection measure we should always | use a secondary phone line plus a secondary email and fake | address for these types of subscriptions. You don't know what | they are going to do. | bombcar wrote: | When you have to utilize dark web techniques to get a gym | membership, maybe it's time to do something else. | bgun wrote: | Even though they conceded, you should still follow through on | all of the above. You aren't hurting a person, it's a | corporation that will only change when forced financially or | socially to do so. | SanderNL wrote: | A small local gym is not "a corporation". | pc86 wrote: | As someone who used to own a couple small local gyms, they | absolutely are. | chitowneats wrote: | The "small local gym" sure was pulling some corporate B.S. | on their supposed "neighbor". | PM_me_your_math wrote: | Yes, all business entities, with the loose exception of a | sole-proprietorship, is a corporation under the law. | | There are four general types of corporations in the United | States: a sole proprietorship, a Limited Liability Company | (LLC), an S-Corporation (S-Corp), and a C-Corporation | (C-Corp). | | People who whine about corporations fail to realize that | 99% of the businesses they deal with everyday are | incorporated entities under the law. Your pizza shop, | tanning salon, dentist, ice cream shop, sandwich truck... | | A business entity can be a good or bad actor. Their legal | status as a corporation does not mean they are | automatically bad, regardless of the size or public/private | status. Their actions and policies define them as either | good or bad. | | Words have meaning and they should be used appropriately. | plagiarist wrote: | Even if it is an individual, the predatory behavior | deserves to be financially ruinous. If they cannot run | their business without scamming people they should never | have had a business. | crazygringo wrote: | Legally it usually is, isn't it? It would be unusual for it | to be a sole proprietorship. | | In any case, predatory/scammy practices are bad no matter | what the ownership structure is. Being small and local | doesn't excuse you from abusive behavior. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | Except legal entities are literally manifest in order to | absorb the fallout from situations like these. So don't be | shy about using existing processes and tools to issue | corrective action. | chrisfosterelli wrote: | Technically, many small companies are corporations. | UniverseHacker wrote: | Honestly, I was mostly bluffing... I didn't have time to do | all of that, which is why I also had to quit the gym. I was | planning to temporarily quit/suspend and then rejoin when I | was able to, but they lost out on that possibility. | | I think these kind of predatory cancellation things must be | in part a generational thing, and these policies are so old | they haven't responded to the times. Older people I know seem | to expect it or be okay with it, but millenials and younger | will tend to be outraged and refuse to do business with them | on principle. America Online, Sirius XM, etc. were able to | retain some customers by making it hard to quit, but I think | turned away far more without realizing it. | jiayo wrote: | Great example. I like broadcast radio. I don't like picking | and choosing podcasts, I like to just listen to "what's | on". I really like some of the live music content on | SiriusXM (celebrity DJs, etc). I'm their ideal customer. | And they'd have captured $300-400 of my value over the past | 1.5 years, if they only had self-serve subscription and | cancellation like Netflix or Disney+. But since they have | decided to go the NYTimes route of "everyone pays a | different price, and cancelling is next to impossible", | they get nothing from me. | OJFord wrote: | Just cancel the payment, I wouldn't even bother to talk to them | if it's clear it'll be difficult. They'll send you a letter or | something saying if you don't update the payment method your | access will be cancelled. Ok? | temporallobe wrote: | I had a similar situation. During covid, a gym I was attending | shut down some of their locations because of covid, forcing all | those members to crowd into fewer locations. Those gyms became | unusable to me because of equipment hogging and overcrowding (I | typically counted on one hour to complete a full workout and | was extremely pressed for time, now it would take me at least | twice that). I tried to cancel, citing my reasons, but I got a | similar runaround to you. I also had to submit my cancellation | in writing and mail it into their corporate office. I refused | to do any of this, so I called my credit card company and | complained that they were fraudulently charging me and | requested that they block further charges. Sure enough, a few | months later I got letters and emails threatening to cancel my | membership because there was an issue with my payment method. | Since the membership was month-to-month, they couldn't hold me | responsible for anything beyond the month for which I had | already paid. | | I joined a small private gym that works on a monthly prepaid | membership. Just pay for the month in advance, and you have | access. Don't pay? No access, no pressure, no worries. Leave | for months at a time and come come back with no hassle. | grammers wrote: | My daughter had dancing lessons in the past (never again!), we | quit because she did not want to go anymore. They told us we | can only quit by the end of the quarter with a month's notice - | it was beginning of March, so too late to quit for end of June. | | Then Covid hit, classes got cancelled; we still had to pay | until end of September. This fine print is totally insane. | JohnTHaller wrote: | Careful, many gyms will send you to collections for failing to | pay to the terms of the contract. | bluGill wrote: | Depending on the law though, you may be able to ignore | collections, and you can dispute it if they put anything on | your credit report. Just because something is in a contract | that doesn't mean it is legal an enforceable. See a lawyer | for details as this is different in every state and country. | bob1029 wrote: | Collections is mostly meaningless if you are otherwise | financially responsible. | | The entire system is quite abusive. You may try experimenting | with "I don't give a shit", assuming your other ducks are in | order. I have found it to be therapeutic. | EastSmith wrote: | I think you should do what you told them you would do anyway - | posting on each and every social network. | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote: | I personally had to get cc dispute started, because, | $my_local_gym_that_is_not_a_chain also uses the same scummy | tactics including, but limited to starting to add more charges. | They also said, I need to fax my hand written cancellation to | their HQ. I did, but as you can guess there is a reason I | opened a dispute with CC. | kemitche wrote: | I had a gym membership that I wanted to cancel because I had | moved, and their closest location was no longer convenient. | | First, they tried to tell me I had to go back to the location I | had originally signed up at in order to cancel. No phone | cancellation options or anything. I guess if I had moved more | than a few miles away, I'd be out of luck. | | After some fighting, the closer location let me fill out a | paper cancellation form. The cancellation form had a very clear | section that showed "paid in full" and "$0 remaining due." | Despite this, I got a bill a month later for my "final month." | I refused to pay it, obviously. They harassed me, calling me | daily. Only once I posted a poor review online did someone | finally decide the $50 (or whatever it was) wasn't worth it. | | They gym itself was a fine gym, but these billing practices are | scummy scummy scummy. I refuse to sign up for any other gym | (except maybe a local rec center) until there's more | legislation to protect my consumer rights. The cancellation | nonsense isn't worth my time. | tshaddox wrote: | I'm guessing you probably won't win a chargeback unless you can | show that you sent them a letter telling them to cancel (and | because of this, they actually will cancel if you send them a | letter). | | I think another aspect of this problem is that credit cards | don't just let you mark a transaction as "don't allow any more | of these." Of course that probably wouldn't solve the problem. | The gyms would probably just continue charging you and | eventually send you to debt collection. | maxsilver wrote: | > credit cards don't just let you mark a transaction as | "don't allow any more of these." | | Ironically, they _do_ almost all support this, you can mark | any merchant as non-future-billable and prevent all future | charges from a given merchant. Unfortunately, you have to | call in and ask a phone rep to do it for you, most cards don | 't let you set this yourself. | dreen wrote: | Sometimes people you talk to have powers to change the outcome | in your favour, sometimes all you need to do is ask. | | I had an experience like that last year. I was cancelling my | broadband in UK with Virgin, and got a PS280 disconnection fee. | The person who informed me said I will have to pay it in my | final bill. Then over a month later I got a call from someone | who's task was to see if I need a new connection where I was | going. I said no, I was leaving the country. He asked if there | was anything else he could do for me. I said, "you could cancel | that huge penalty fee I got.." And he was just like "Sure, no | problem, done." | manuelabeledo wrote: | A "disconnection fee"? This has to be the most absurd charge | I have ever heard of. | | What does "disconnecting" a customer involve, anyway? I | recall having to return equipment or face a penalty to cover | costs (high, but still somewhat understandable), but I have | never had to pay to get off a broadband contract. | ipqk wrote: | Often if you sign a yearly contract that includes a | discounted monthly rate, if you cancel it before the end of | the year, you have to pay the remainder of the contract | remaining. | Symbiote wrote: | It's common where there's a significant installation fee | (perhaps installing a fibre thing on your house) which was | waived in return for a 12 or 24 month contract. | amalcon wrote: | That's just the beginning. My favorite is the concept of | the pre-payment penalty: a lender can (in some | jurisdictions) charge you a fee if you attempt to pay down | the principal on your loan sooner than you are required to. | sclarisse wrote: | It's somewhat reasonable. If you make a loan, and it's | paid early, you stop making the expected profit and there | is no guarantee you can reinvest the funds at the same | rate. Therefore you will either disallow prepayment, | charge for it, or price the risk of prepayment into your | interest rate. If you can't do any of those ... you will | invest elsewhere until the rates go up, for there is lots | of competition for capital. | | But borrowers should know what they're getting into, and | have options. | [deleted] | pmalynin wrote: | Canada has this for mortgages no? | heffer wrote: | Yes, other countries too, like Germany. | | It's supposed to compensate banks for lost profit from | you not paying interest for the entire term. Equally, a | bank can't cancel your mortgage before the term ends for | the sole reason that it would be able to charge higher | rates for a new mortgage. | dcomp wrote: | Most likely an early disconnection fee during the minimum | term. Nearly everyone has a minimum term with virgin media | as they only apply promotional discounts if you have a | 12,18 or 24 month minimum term and the price shoots up as | soon as you roll over onto the monthly. | | [1] https://www.virginmedia.com/legal/fibre-optic-services- | terms... | bombcar wrote: | This is it exactly; it's kind of understandable given how | they want you subscribe for a long time, and most have an | exception that a high-enough ranking person can mark | (even if it's just "military exception" misused). | dreen wrote: | Yep, something like that. I would have had to know if and | when Im moving a year in advance, which is ridiculous. I | mean it's not like I read the fine print on that, so all | the better that they had no problem cancelling the fee. | OJFord wrote: | I haven't heard of (or it called) a 'disconnection' fee, | but 'exit' fees are common. There's no pretence with that | that there's _work_ to do in terminating your contract, it | 's just, oh, you signed up for 24m, you want to leave in | month 18, ok no problem but we'll sting you for PSX because | the alternative is probably you have actually technically | committed legally to 24 months so in a way although it | doesn't feel like it we're doing you a favour. ... It's | pretty shit I think for tenants in particular where the | available service periods don't necessarily line up with | the time they actually spend in the property. | Danjoe4 wrote: | Revoking ACH authorization is an effective tactic. The CFPB | dictates that if you give 3 days notice, companies are | obligated to honor this. If they charge you afterwards, your | bank will be more than happy to reverse the charge. To be | clear, this doesn't void the contract you have with them, | you're simply revoking their privilege to charge your payment | method. If they want your money they'd have to take you to | small claims. Here is a sample email which I've used many times | to great effect: | | May this email serve as your notice to revoke the ACH/Bank | Access/Debit Card authorizations of both the below primary bank | account and debit card, from [company] effective today, [date] | | [Bank Name] Checking Account x** Savings Account x** and Debit | Card x** | | Additionally, I am revoking withdrawal authorizations from any | other accounts associated with my personal information, listed | below | | name: DOB: phone #: email: | | I am also revoking your further access to my banking accounts | and have already removed your authorization with the Bank | directly. | | THIS REVOCATION APPLIES FOR THE NEXT PAYMENT DUE DATE AND ALL | FUTURE DUE DATES. | | Kindly, I ask that your response to this email shall be | confirmation of receipt and you agree it is at least 3 business | days prior to any scheduled repayments or membership fee | deduction. | | Note that in accordance with 12 CFR Part 1005.10(c) (Regulation | E) you MUST HALT PAYMENT. | | FAIL TO COMPLY and I will submit a report to the Bureau of | Consumer Financial Protection. Additionally, you will be | responsible for any fees, including overdraft fees, incurred as | a result of your failure to halt payment | nijave wrote: | Some companies report this type of thing to consumer trust | worthiness services (similar to credit bureaus). Other | companies use these services to gage customer risk before | initiating new service so you can effectively get yourself | blacklisted. | | Not saying this answer isn't the way to do it, but it's not | without additional collateral damage in some cases. | | Even if it doesn't impact other companies, the company in | question may refuse to do business with you in the future | (which may or may not be of concern). | KennyBlanken wrote: | > If they want your money they'd have to take you to small | claims. | | No, they'll just send it to collections, and now your credit | is dinged for seven years because unless they violated their | contract with you, you're still liable for the charges. | bob1029 wrote: | I've let a few things go to collections over the years. | Comcast disputes, etc. Never really saw any impact from | this. Total charge-offs probably around $1000. Not once | have I had an issue getting financing or mortgage. | | If you are intending to pay cash for everything, you don't | even need a credit score. No one cares about who you are or | what you did when you walk in the door with a bag of cash | in each hand. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | Ive never heard of gyms doing that. Is it real? They are | not a lender and are not lending money to you, so I don't | see how they can affect your credit report. There's no | credit involved. | | Anyone actually have a credit report with an unpaid gym | membership in the report? | TylerE wrote: | There is credit involved, because the contracts are | worded such that's, say, a _12 month_ contract paid in | monthly installments. The credit is the outstanding | balance vs. if you had paid for the full year in cash up | front. | | Your credit report is answering one question: How good | are you about paying for things you've agreed to pay for. | AdmiralAsshat wrote: | Worked on collections software for XX years. I definitely | knew of a few clients that collected on behalf of gyms. | | You'd be surprised what gets sent to collections. I | recall one client that collected on behalf of a fried | chicken restaurant. | bluGill wrote: | Seems unlikely - collections only want to work with bills | large enough that their odds of payment make it worth | talking to you. Collectors never gives full price, they | pay the person you owe some smaller amount, and when you | pay they collect the difference. | | There are levels of collections though the first is for | things where they expect you will pay, you just need a | payment plan (some medical labs don't do billing in | house, they always sell it to collections), so | collections will buy the bill for the pull price minus | $50 (or some minimal amount in that range): since most | people are going to pay collections just needs to setup | the details for which $50 is a fair price. At the other | end there are bills that they know you are not going to | pay, collections will buy the a multi-thousand dollar | bill for $1, and see if they can get any form of payment | at all out of you. | | Anyway, the bottom line is for a gym you are never going | to owe enough that it is worthwhile for collections to | touch it. | UniverseHacker wrote: | I don't think they can do this- generally credit is tracked | by social security number (in the USA). If you don't | provide them with one, they will not be able to report you | to a credit bureau. | [deleted] | preommr wrote: | And people actually reply to that? | | What do you do if they tell you no one got this email? | pc86 wrote: | You mean what do you do if someone knowingly lies in order | to continue fraudulently charging you for something? Sounds | like a crime to me. | | But more realistically, at that point you've already filed | a claim with the CFPB so who cares what they say? It will | get settled one way or the other. | tadfisher wrote: | Unfortunately, "ACH authorization" is a collective delusion, | as there is no technical mechanism in the protocol to prevent | ACH pulls. | | Better to use something like a Privacy card in the first | place so you can revoke it on your own terms. | tyingq wrote: | >there is no technical mechanism in the protocol to prevent | ACH pull | | Nothing in the protocol, but many individual banks have | their own in-house ways of failing the pull. | yuliyp wrote: | It's not a delusion. From a legal perspective, the bank | treats actions which are authorized by you and actions | which are not differently. If you enter into an agreement | that says you're authorizing entity X to charge you based | on a contract and they charge you, the bank is likely to | side with them, and tell you to go sue them if you want | your money bank. If the bank knows that you did not | authorize the ACH transfer, they're supposed to reverse the | transaction. | benced wrote: | Bits have color, no matter what us software engineers | think: https://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23 | [deleted] | patmorgan23 wrote: | The mechanism is when the bank authorizes or denys the ACH | pull. | foobarian wrote: | Are there privacy cards that work? I find that once a | recurring charge is established and tied to an account it's | very hard to cancel, surviving expired cards or even | canceled card numbers. | astura wrote: | You can revoke a subscription in PayPal. | pc86 wrote: | Privacy generates a valid CC # with protections you set | up (one-time use, monthly maxes, per-charge maxes, etc). | fouc wrote: | I think they're referring to privacy.com specifically, | which should give fully cancellable virtual cards. Or so | I heard. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | citi, capital one, and others call it "virtual cards". | They allow you to set charge limits and exp date. I | always choose the current month + 1 for expiration and | for charge limit, $1 more than the anticipated charge | flutas wrote: | Or just get you dinged for $200+ of fraud and they will | refuse to do anything about it. | kube-system wrote: | It is common for gyms to only accept ACH | HWR_14 wrote: | There doesn't have to be a technical mechanism. There is a | legal one. | IronWolve wrote: | Mine had a clause if I moved 30 miles away I could cancel. And I | moved to the country, so I canceled. They wanted a letter from my | preacher to prove it, my power bill wasnt enough for them. | ipqk wrote: | I assume the side effect of this happening is that everyone's | rates will go up. | asah wrote: | is there a link to provide public commentary? | benguild wrote: | Can't wait for all of the deceptive corporate marketing against | this! | insane_dreamer wrote: | I hope this extends to every business. I wanted to cancel an | arts&craft subscription package for my son (he lost interest) and | had to call during business hours and be on hold forever to get | through, which I never managed to do because ... guess what ... | I'm f*ing working during business hours. Literally months went by | before my wife, bless her soul, finally got it done (and was on | hold for an hour and then had to haggle with them for another | hour). Never again. | asah wrote: | thank god we're back to having regulators doing their jobs. | | I'm not sure whether to thank biden or anyone-but-trump or | something else - but whoever is responsible, *THANK YOU*. | [deleted] | sylware wrote: | yeah, and don't forget those "timeshares" abominations (cf latest | last week tonigh). | Waterluvian wrote: | In Canada (and probably elsewhere) it's very common for a cell | phone web portal to give you a TON of power to make changes, add | features, make upgrades. All automatically. But any sort of | downgrade or cancellation magically requires you to call a | retentions department where, surprise, the employees are | incentivized to hang up on you or screw things up to meet their | quotas so they can feed their families. | oidar wrote: | > so they can feed their families. | | You are free. But you are only free to sell your labor. | brutusurp wrote: | How about those sneaky add-on subscriptions in Amazon Prime (via | Prime Video and Music)? Lots of people complaining that there was | auto-enroll happening. | readme wrote: | Once when I was without money, I had to cancel a gym | subscription. Inside the gym, the manager informed me of how I | couldn't cancel because of my contract. This was a mom&pop level | gym, too. It's also worth mentioning that he parked his Porsche | cayenne on the sidewalk. | | He did let me cancel, on the condition that I acknowledged it was | because a he is a good christian man. | | I'm not making this up. | Fnoord wrote: | It should be rather simple to deal with: if the cancel method is | more difficult than the method to subscribe, then the customer | does not have to pay any service due if they do not want to. Or | with the addendum: its up to the company who deliver the service | to prove that the customer has used their service; otherwise, the | other party would need to prove. | SkyMarshal wrote: | Can they add T-mobile to the list too? You can't unsubscribe via | their website, have to call and argue with a customer retention | assho... er rep. | cocoa19 wrote: | I get the sentiment, but we should blame the system. The reps | are just trying to make a living for a low pay and don't have | much power to change things. | expertentipp wrote: | I know it's about US but this screams to me "Germany". They are | the top subscription predators on our continent. Two years | duration by default, automatic renewal, cancellation 3 months in | advance by post or fax. Stay away from subscriptions when dealing | with entity incorporated in Germany. | kunwon1 wrote: | Tangentially related - I signed up for DSL through Deutsch | Telekom while living on a US military base in Germany, in 2002. | I signed up in person at a DT location, and due to the language | barrier, I did not get the 'unlimited' plan that I asked for. | Instead, I got a 10 hour per month plan, with hourly overage | charges once I passed 10 hours. I did not discover this mistake | until I returned from a deployment several months later, during | which I left my DSL connected. The bill from DT was over 10,000 | euros. I never paid, and I had to use creative methods to get | online from then onwards. It was annoying. | skrause wrote: | It seems like you haven't followed Germany's laws for a while. | It's now mandatory that you can cancel the say way you signed | up, so if you allow people to sign up online you _have_ to | allow them to cancel online. All contracts can also be canceled | monthly now after the agreed minimum duration. | | Source: https://www-baden--wuerttemberg- | de.translate.goog/de/service... | cloverich wrote: | Can they loop in New York Times subscription? You have to _call_ | them during business hours to cancel. When I was subscribed, I | prompted myself to cancel when we had to change CC numbers | (random fraud), so I finally called NYT to cancel. "You have to | pay out first" -- no problem, I'll pay last bill right now and | cancel. "Once you pay out, you have to wait two days before you | can cancel it". WTF? Outright shady. | kemitche wrote: | I've cancelled my NYT sub online, a year or two back. I keep | seeing anecdotes like yours pop-up, though. I don't know if | they have different policies based on billing address or | something. | | I remember distinctly because when I _first_ signed up, it | wasn't an option. A year or two later they emailed something | about "Look how cool we are, you can cancel with just a few | clicks now!" as if it was something to be proud of, rather than | just them finally using consumer-friendly practices. | astura wrote: | IIRC If your billing address is in California you have the | option of cancelling online. | com2kid wrote: | I'm in WA state, just checked, there is a big "cancel | online" button, quite noticable. | Spoom wrote: | Are you in California? They are forced by law to make it | easier to cancel in California, but they don't extend that | anywhere else AFAIK. | noelsusman wrote: | I'm in NC and I'm seeing an option to cancel online. | yankeetango wrote: | it's not because of CPRA | Someone1234 wrote: | Supposedly it is doable if you sign up in California/EU and a | few other states that have regulations on this. | louison11 wrote: | I feel ya, but there is worse: in France to cancel most | services (mobile plan, bank accounts...) you need to send a | registered mail. Suffice it to say, living abroad, there is a | bunch of services I literally cannot cancel because of that. To | close a mobile account, I recently had to cancel the credit | card, then ignore emails from the debt collection agency they | hired, for them to finally close my account. | justeleblanc wrote: | > Suffice it to say, living abroad, there is a bunch of | services I literally cannot cancel because of that. | | Nonsense. Send your registered mail online with la poste. It | has the same legal value. I'm not saying that requiring | registered mail isn't shitty, but letting this go to debt | collection is making things difficult for yourself with no | good reason. | | And by the way, a law has been enacted that will force | business to offer online cancellation starting June 1st: | https://www.tomsguide.fr/fin-des-lettres-recommandees- | pour-r... | louison11 wrote: | I'm glad they passed the law! Thank you, had no idea you | could use La Poste to send registered mails online. As a | busy parent, schemes like this definitely prey on people's | lack of time to never cancel. | nijave wrote: | Then you get hit with 30+- minute hold times and random | "accidental" hangups/disconnects | OkayPhysicist wrote: | Sometimes changing your billing address to somewhere in | California can solve this. CA has a law saying that if you can | sign up for a service online, you need to be able to cancel it | online immediately, and be able to do so through either a | "prominently located direct link or button" on the website or a | preformatted email that the consumer can send to terminate the | subscription without taking any further steps. | meepmorp wrote: | Tangential to this - no small part of the reason why I like | subscriptions in the iPhone App Store is because Apple doesn't | let billers fuck around like this. There's one place to see | everything, and you can cancel anything in a couple clicks. It's | part of why I'd probably never use an alternative app store. | ljf wrote: | True, but they still have the '8 day free trial then PS59.99 a | year billing' for some apps. My wife installed a design app she | wanted to try out, forgot to cancel and was stung last week. | For such a high purchase price that feels to me like there | should be addition verification step before charging. | | Especially since the app was terrible and the reviews were full | of people who were similarly charged and unhappy. | j16sdiz wrote: | Apple allow you to press cancel immediately after sign up and | the account will remain valid until the 8th day. | latexr wrote: | Anecdotally, I had both an Apple Arcade and an Apple TV | trial a few years back. I tried cancelling prematurely to | avoid surprise charges and the interface told me in no | uncertain terms that if I cancelled before the trial | expired, I'd lose access immediately. | ceejayoz wrote: | I think there's also a 14 day grace period after the charge | to cancel and refund the subscription. | https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204084 | nickthegreek wrote: | What is bonkers about that? Apple let 2 consenting parties | enter into an agreement and provides a single interface to | cancel that agreement whenever you want from their pocket | without talking to anyone. I struggle to think of a better | setup. | Fnoord wrote: | > What is bonkers about that? | | That people forget. That's part of the market of trial and | subs in general. Its why gyms flourish. People subscribe | but don't go. | | They (iOS) have the data that you use or not use the app. | They could notify you with a warning that your renewal is | due. Or allow you the option to set the reminder in your | calendar or bank app. | Mavvie wrote: | I think the Google Play store also sends you a reminder | before a free trial converts to a paid plan, which is | better. | nickthegreek wrote: | That is a great idea, but I could not find any | information/screenshots about Google Play doing this. | joseph_grobbles wrote: | You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and | villainy than "free trial" subscription-based apps on the | App Store. It is, overwhelmingly, a tool used for scams. | | The pattern- | | -hide promised functionality behind subscription. | | -offer "free trial", often with very short trial periods. | | -convert that into a big dollar subscriptions. | | They know that most of the people who they ensnare are | probably going through a multitude of tools trying to find | a solution for some problem (and the fact the tool in | question often fails to do what it promised is a feature | because it encourages the user to move on quicker), and | some subset will fail to cancel the "trial" before it | becomes a pay service. | | Consenting adults, sure, and personally I have never fallen | prey to this, looking at the in-app purchases and just | refusing to be baited, but it's enough of a problem that it | should embarrass Apple a bit. | burnished wrote: | One in which no one is surprised when a free trial rolls | over to a paid subscription - perhaps that shouldnt even be | allowable, given that its mostly done to make money off of | people not paying attention. | nickthegreek wrote: | If they are surprised, then the user was not paying | attention multiple times. | | https://www.macrumors.com/2019/04/11/app-store- | subscription-... | burnished wrote: | Let me spell it out more clearly - surprised that the | transaction occurred because they forgot to cancel it. | | Do you not see this as plainly duplicitous behavior? I | think the intention to deceive is far more cogent than | any warnings. | johnfn wrote: | Completely true. One way this has saved me in the past: Audible | has an incredibly shady practice where the only way to get | books is that their subscription service gives you tokens (1 a | month) to redeem books with. However, if you cancel your | subscription, your tokens are lost. But, if you subscribe to | Audible through Apple, then because of Apple the tokens are | retained, even if you cancel. | galkk wrote: | Wow, this is good to know, thanks. | rootusrootus wrote: | I tend to agree, with a caveat. If you have a family Apple | account and one of your family members has a subscription, you | do not have visibility even though it is your credit card | getting billed. So for a complete picture you have to log into | each of your kids' devices to see if they have an active | subscription. | | It seems to be done for privacy reasons, but I don't agree with | how they handle it. I should be able to see all charges going | to my Apple account credit card no matter which sub-account | originated them. | Riseed wrote: | In my online credit card account, I can expand each purchase | and "show digital receipt" to get information about what | app/subscription it was for. For all App Store purchases, | Apple will also email the account that made the purchase | (even if it's me) to let them know the purchase details were | requested. That seems reasonable to me--the payer knows what | the payment was for, and the purchaser knows the info was | accessed. | chewmieser wrote: | You can actually see this information on | reportaproblem.apple.com now. Has recent charges by each | family member and tells you if a subscription will renew. | cloverich wrote: | Also they force subscriptions to make the actual price you pay | the most prominent. Common dark pattern is to put "8.99" a | month, then under it in tiny text "Billed immediately as | 107.88, renews annually". To pass Apple's approval, they would | have to write "107.88" in large text, as that is what you are | actually going to be charged. | shortcake27 wrote: | 1Password got me with this. I was getting it for free because | my work used it, but when I left, write/autofill was | suspended. I had planned to move to a different service as I | dislike 1P8, but I was in a hurry to just get things working | again, and $2.99 a month is cheap enough to get me by for a | few months. I enter my CC details. Get charged $39.47 (10% | for GST). I go back and look at the site and realise the | monthly price is billed annually. I don't recall being quoted | this price when I entered my CC details, perhaps it was | displayed in a way that was easy to miss for people in a | hurry. In any case there's a dark pattern in their checkout | flow. It's disingenuous to to advertise $2.99 and bill | $39.47. Imagine a cafe that advertises the price of their | coffee as 40c then in smallprint "times 12 made in a single | payment". The advertised price should match the billed price | for all products and services. | knodi123 wrote: | > advertises the price of their coffee as 40c then in | smallprint "times 12 made in a single payment". | | lol, exactly like the mail-order CD club I signed up for | back in high school. | peoplearepeople wrote: | Cancelling subscriptions on apple devices is a dream, I love it | lp0_on_fire wrote: | True, but it makes auditing your bank account slightly more | difficult. | | Charges come through as "Apple" (or some variation) without | indicating what the purchase was for. They also roll charges | together so they're not hitting your bank account multiple | times in a short period. | | It's not a lot of work to go into your apple account and | compare the invoices to your bank account to see what the | charge was _actually_ for, but it was a pain in the rear when | our credit card was stolen and used by the thief to Nickle | and Dime us for 5-10 dollars here and there over the course | of 6 months. | post-it wrote: | They also send out the receipt emails a few days later than | the actual charge, so when they charge you you can't | immediately go check what the charge was for. I've found | that spreadsheeting everything at the end of the month is | the easiest way to do it. | teeray wrote: | I model it as another account in my books. Each | subscription has a recurring debit and it gets credited | when money actually moves from my bank. It's a bit annoying | if I buy a one-off thing since I have to enter it by hand, | but it's infrequent enough that it's not horrible. | nicolas_t wrote: | One of my friend maintains a fitness app that uses in-app | subscription when subscribing through the app or subscription | through the website with a credit card. | | The apple subscription generate a lot more support requests | because a lot of customers are confused on how to stop the in | app subscription. Unfortunately, the company can't stop the | subscription, it can only be done by the customer through the | app store, so instead of just being able to cancel it for | confused customers who request it, they have to guide them to | cancel it on their side which is a lot of work. | jkestner wrote: | Your friend should look into deep-linking to the | subscriptions screen in the App Store from within their | app. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15530794/link-to- | app-man... | roflyear wrote: | It's just as easy on Android | mrbombastic wrote: | I agree but interestingly had a conversation with my family and | they all had the opposite impression. They were complaining | about mysterious recurring apple charges on their bank cards | that they had no idea what they were or how to find out. I | pointed out that you could see all your subscriptions under | your Apple ID on your phone and they were all amazed. Long | winded way of saying, if anyone from apple is reading this, | maybe make this more discoverable and if possible disambiguate | the charges on the bill (maybe put the originating app name for | the subscription in the charge?). | shortcake27 wrote: | I wish Apple would just combine all my subscriptions into a | single payment. | robg wrote: | 1000% - just wish they'd drop their fees so that more companies | would see the benefits versus rolling their own. | dang wrote: | Related: | | _"Click to subscribe, call to cancel" is illegal, FTC says_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29250063 - Nov 2021 (860 | comments) | rootusrootus wrote: | I want this for _all_ subscriptions, not just gym & cable. I had | to waste 15 minutes of my life a few weeks ago convincing The | Economist to actually cancel my subscription. They were deceitful | and tried various ways of phrasing their counter offers hoping | I'd slip up and say something other than "No, just cancel." | | If I can sign up on the web site, I should be able to cancel with | just as many clicks. | OkayPhysicist wrote: | > If I can sign up on the web site, I should be able to cancel | with just as many clicks. | | Fun fact! Websites actually have to support this for their | California subscribers. If a website is refusing to let you do | so, it's not that they haven't implemented it, it's just that | they want to screw you. As a corollary, a lot of websites get a | lot easier to cancel if you change your billing address to | somewhere in CA. | loaph wrote: | You should read the article! You would get this in the case | you'd described as well | nashashmi wrote: | > Khan said it likely wouldn't apply to non-commercial services | like recurring political donations, which have also left some | donors feeling scammed and tricked. | | Khan knows how to stay clear of politically intense scenarios. | She also has not gone against Amazon which was the entire thesis | of her paper. Assigning Khan into this position forced Amazon to | cozy up to politicians, and keep funding them in some shape or | form. This was a net gain for both parties. This was a net gain | for politics. | yieldcrv wrote: | hit NY Times too please. | AlbertCory wrote: | Similar to privacy.com, which you can use to give predators a | credit card that you can cancel: | | You can open another checking account at your bank easily, | online. I use that for my book expenses and (cough) royalties. | Close the account after notifying the gym in writing that you're | canceling, and _voila_ they can 't charge you anymore. | | (that's if the gym draws from your bank account and not by | charging a credit card. You could also tell the bank to reject | charges from the gym, if that works.) | weezin wrote: | I had a gym that I signed up online for, I tried to cancel one | day in person and they said I had to fill out a questionnaire and | mail it to cancel. Fuck that company. | logicalmonster wrote: | Misguided priority IMO. Silicon Valley's actions are much more | egregiously and obviously criminal than even the worst gym. | | As tough to cancel as some gym memberships are, they at least | usually spell out their precise cancellation procedure as a part | of a contract and have multiple ways to get in touch with some | human to deal with a situation. And there's always some path to | cancel the service (even if it's annoying by design and has you | jumping through multiple hoops). And with these gyms, as a last | resort you at least have a chargeback as a fairly realistic | option with no consequences to your life. | | What I'd like to see investigated in this vein is Silicon Valley | companies who provide no human customer service. Your only | recourse in the event of a flawed transaction is either suck it | up and take the loss, or do a chargeback and risk having your | entire digital life destroyed as they retaliate against you by | locking up your account. What these companies do to people daily | is criminal on a level that the worst gym can't even fathom. | pjc50 wrote: | Why not both? | SkyMarshal wrote: | On the flip side it's actual useful to have no human customer | service in at least domain - mobile service. For example, it's | much more difficult to sim swap a Google Voice number than a | T-mobile number, in part b/c it removes social engineering of | customer service as an attack vector. | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | The FTC can do more than one thing at a time. | logicalmonster wrote: | [flagged] | CogitoCogito wrote: | > And there's always some path to cancel the service (even if | it's annoying by design and has you jumping through multiple | hoops). | | Why do they even get to dictate how you cancel? You should just | be able to send them a letter, an email, go in and inform them, | etc. What purpose does it serve for society for companies | themselves to be able decide to ignore your cancellation | requests unless they follow a specific procedure? | logicalmonster wrote: | Is this the hill you really want to fight for in life? If a | gym offers an email address, real life support, and/or a | phone number to cancel, are you going to be intensely morally | outraged that you can't send a physical letter to cancel as | well? | | Doesn't it seem reasonable for businesses to (for the most | part) pick and choose how they conduct business and deal with | their customers, so long as they're not committing fraud or | other crimes? | | Isn't the point of the law to protect people from crimes? Is | the point of the law to dictate the tiny minute details of | everyday life? | janj wrote: | This is great. Maybe one day we'll see action on timeshares. I | got one a long time ago that was impossible to get rid of. Fully | paid for, Westgate told me it had a lot of value so I told them | to just take it back, but they would't of course. I ended up just | stopping all payments, went through a few years of harassing | calls, and then done, nothing more. Still haunts me though, I'm | afraid it could come back up with outstanding balance owed. | Volundr wrote: | I think it can. More scary though, when you die unless they | take active action to refuse it, your kids or whoever your | inheritance goes to gets it by default. With all the financial | obligations. | havblue wrote: | I guess if you inherit a timeshare you can just insist that | it goes to a sibling. Or, even better, a step-sibling... | loaph wrote: | You can also tell probate court that you refuse the | inheritance. You can't be forced to inherit something | Volundr wrote: | You can, but there is specific paperwork you have to file | and you have something like 90 days to do it. And then | the next person in line has to, and the next. | | Unless everyone is on the ball and actively refuses it, | someone gets stuck with it. | Plasmoid wrote: | Why can't you create a corporation, have the corp buy it from | you for $1, and then go bankrupt in a month or three? | janj wrote: | Could this work? It could potentially help a very large | number of people get out of these scams. Seems so obvious | now that you point it out I imagine someone must've thought | of this before. | avidiax wrote: | I imagine the timeshare company has right of first | refusal for transfers, or will be adding that to their | contracts as soon as this is a thing. | | Now, is it legal? Maybe, maybe not. But they will pretend | it is until you take them to court, and they'll quickly | settle if you agree not to tell anyone else. | janj wrote: | Or maybe find people at end-of-life with no heirs that | would buy it for a $1 in exchange for a donation to their | charity of choice. | toast0 wrote: | You'd need to be careful about how you setup and run the | corporation such that the veil can't be pierced. If a court | got involved, I think they'd be nonplussed if the | corporation was organized, acquired the property, and filed | for bankruptcy within a couple of months. | cableshaft wrote: | Yeah, John Oliver just did a Last Week Tonight on Timeshares. | He goes over that in the video. Also there are scam companies | that exist that promise to take your money to help you exit | your timeshare agreement, then disappear. So you get double- | scammed. And somehow this is technically legal? | | Link to the Last Week Tonight video: | https://youtu.be/Bd2bbHoVQSM | janj wrote: | I was contacted by those people and others, both | threatening and claiming to want to help. I had a suspicion | they were all affiliated with the parent scam company | Westgate and so never considered dealing with any of them. | Maybe they weren't related to Westgate but good to keep in | mind anyone in this space is not to be trusted. | deckard1 wrote: | My dad got a Westgate timeshare back in the '90s. I was there | when he was conned. And even at the young age I _knew_ the | salesman was the sleeziest guy on Earth. He drove us around in | their limo to impress us, showing us their property. The way he | talked just felt slimy. | | My mom recently told me they tried to book their week at the | timeshare and were told they would have to pay $1,000 to do so. | Because it's a premium week or whatever bullshit. It's | absolutely insane this predatory company is allowed to | continue. I'm going to be forced to deal with this fucking | thing when he dies. That's the truly insane thing. It's treated | as property, but it's not. It's a fucking _subscription_ that | you can 't cancel. Ever. You own nothing. | avidiax wrote: | By the way, depending on your state, you may have to | officially file to _not_ receive the timeshare and its | obligations in your father 's estate. And whoever is next in | line to inherit has to do the same, on down the line until | the state, I suppose. | | Would love to see Westgate tell the state of Massachusetts | that they are the legal owners of this timeshare, and owe for | annual repairs. | temporallobe wrote: | I am extremely disappointed that US laws in almost all cases, | seem to side with businesses, or at the very least turn a blind | eye to very obvious consumer abuses. Actually, I'll take that | further: it seems like our system is _designed_ to allow consumer | abuse. I am shocked that our government is actually standing up | for us, but I am being cautiously optimistic because lobbyists | have a way of shutting that shit down real quick. Look at how | ferociously corporate America has been fighting against proposed | right-to-repair legislation. Yay for New York, but we need | federal involvement on that one too, please and thank you. | Clubber wrote: | I subscribed to the NYT a few years ago and it took a phone call | and a retention pitch to finally unsubscribe. I vowed to never | subscribe again as long as this was in place. | rainytuesday wrote: | "Xperience Fitness" made me show up in person and sign a | document. This needed to then be faxed to HQ. Of course, the | gym didn't have a fax machine. So had to find a fax machine, | send off a fax and wonder if anybody is going to look at it on | the other end. This was in 2015 or so, not 1986. | xhkkffbf wrote: | I just interacted with the WSJ several days ago. It was | extremely annoying -- and probably painful to the poor customer | service rep who has to take these calls. | seanp2k2 wrote: | I don't read any of these regularly, but the Apple One | subscription includes Apple News+ or whatever it's called and | that lets you read NYT, WSJ, LA Times, and quite a few | others...only works in the Apple News app though. That's the | annoying part -- you don't technically have a subscription | with them, so you can't comment (if that matters to you). | It's more comparable to RSS feed access, albeit with no ads | and full fidelity articles. | | Honestly, I prefer it to their own apps, and the price + | cancellation policy is WAY better. | Aaronstotle wrote: | I subscribe to the economist, and they automatically renew at a | rate of $199 per year, I called to cancel and they drop it to | $80 per year. Would save everyone the time if they started with | $80 | [deleted] | glitcher wrote: | My previous Internet provider Cox tried this tactic on me | when I canceled. My reply to them was ok, so you're admitting | to overcharging me all along. I'll agree to stay with you if | you also provide a refund for all previous months I was | overcharged. They finally agreed to close my account at that | point :) | seanp2k2 wrote: | FWIW Comcast does this too. Just call them every 11 months | and make them give you a better price. It's dumb as heck and | I want to live long enough to see them burn to the ground, | but it's one call I will make as it lets us give the only ISP | option at our address in Silicon Valley that can actually | give us gigabit download speeds (and capped 40mbit upload | with a 1.2tb data cap) less money. | | If the rep you talk to won't do it, hang up and call again. | kube-system wrote: | My favorite thing to do with ISPs is to schedule | cancellation at 1PM and then schedule installation as a new | customer at 2PM. | | "Can I get the new customer rate" | | "No that is only for new customers" | | "Okay I'd like to cancel" | | "Great, anything else I can do for you today" | | "Sure, I'd like to sign up for new service" | jdeibele wrote: | My wife subscribed to The Economist but we weren't reading | it. I tried changing my address to California, which has | worked for some subscriptions because of California's | consumer-friendly subscription cancellation law. That didn't | work. | | I tried doing the chat to cancel. I said multiple times that | we wanted to cancel and the person (presumably a person | following a script, although they certainly seemed robotic) | just kept ignoring that. Eventually I said I'm cancelling, if | you charge us, I'll charge it back and took a screenshot of | that. | | When they charged me, I charged it back. No need for the | screenshot, which was mildly disappointing because this was | one time where I felt I had proof that I tried to cancel. | | We'll never subscribe to The Economist again. If you make it | this difficult to leave, better not to start. | nanidin wrote: | During the chat, they kept trying to make conversation, to | ask questions, and to retain me. I just copy/pasted "I'm | not here for chit-chat, please cancel the subscription and | confirm once complete" each time they tried to engage me. | | Immediately after my subscription expired they started | emailing me 1/2 off offers. The whole experience put a bad | taste in my mouth and I won't be back. | ciabattabread wrote: | Apparently, if you live in California, you have an easy online | unsubscribe process. | yankeetango wrote: | NYT problem was due in part that we had _so_ many legacy | systems related to subscriptions; there was a _big_ push | internally to solve this. | | When "online cancel" finally rolled out we were all so excited | there was a party with a sheetcake that had the cancellation | landing page printed on it. We'd rather have users trust us | than use dark patterns to "trap" them into a subscription. | sysadmindotfail wrote: | I've read this many times on HN, Reddit, etc. Last week I just | used a VPN. Took 30 seconds to click-click unsubscribe. | | PS - During the process I was offered like 60% off if I kept | the subscription. | brewdad wrote: | NYTimes changed their policy sometime during the Covid years. | I canceled back in 2017-18 and can confirm that it took me | talking over the phone rep repeatedly saying nothing but | "Cancel." for them to stop the retention spiel and finally | close my account. | lp0_on_fire wrote: | That would be wonderful. I had the unpleasant experience of | joining a gym then shortly moving several hours away. Cancelling | the gym subscription was the last thing on my mind at the time. | | I legit had to drive back to this gym in New Jersey to sign a | form to "cancel" my membership. They would not accept a phone | call, email, not even a signed letter stating my intent to | cancel, even after I explained to them I had moved hours away. | Ridiculous. | kumarski wrote: | This is going to be amazing if you can time it. | 52358 wrote: | I still have a membership to Planet Fitness from 5 years ago that | charges to my account every month | | while I had no problem signing up online, you can only cancel | your membership in person at your "home" location, or by sending | them a certified mail letter formally request cancellation (which | I have tried and failed apparently because I never heard back) | | I now live on the other side of the country, so it feels | ridiculous to spend money on a flight ticket just to cancel a gym | membership | | worse, Planet Fitness requires you provide bank account/routing | number for payment, so there is no way to cancel payment unless I | switch bank accounts | pjc50 wrote: | > certified mail letter formally request cancellation (which I | have tried and failed apparently because I never heard back) | | Try small claims court in _your_ jurisdiction. You can then | present this in evidence. | teeray wrote: | It won't look good either if they charge you after they've | been served about that legal action. That's probably the most | formal written notification! | kube-system wrote: | The contract requires you to send the letter to cancel, but it | doesn't prohibit you from calling to discuss the matter. You | have already cancelled in compliance with the terms of the | contract, you don't have to hop on a flight to do anything. | shanebellone wrote: | "unless I switch bank accounts" | | And if you do, they will keep your membership active (for | years) before reporting debt to the credit agencies. | dangwhy wrote: | no because they don't require ssn to signup. | shanebellone wrote: | I've had it happen. | astura wrote: | It's a common misconception. | | I don't know why people think that something magically | can't effect your credit report without knowledge of your | SSN. Name+address+DOB is enough to identify you. | | Chase does not require a Social Security number when you | add an authorized user so people are always absolutely | shocked their "authorized user account" appears on their | credit report. | somehnguy wrote: | Yup, I had a ton of delinquent accounts on my credit | reports that were a similar (but not exact) name and | similar (but not exact) SSN and similar (but not exact) | birthdate as mine. Seems they'll just find the closest | match and slap it on. | | I learned this as I was applying for student loans at the | end of highschool and kept getting denied. It's the | reason I ended up having to take a bunch of crazy high | interest rates from Sallie Mae/now Navient to go to | college as planned. | | Of course the credit agencies reporting all these false | debts suffer 0 consequences for it, only the consumer | does. I'm still pretty mad about it 15 years later if | that isn't coming through :) | noelsusman wrote: | https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/how-do-i-stop-autom... | SkipperCat wrote: | Contact your bank and explain what's going on. They may have a | way to block Planet Fitness' auto charge. Your bank should be | sympathetic and they control outflows. | | After a while, PF will drop their auto-charge because they | won't want to deal with the rejected payment requests. | | I hope I'm correct about this and I hope it helps! | booi wrote: | They absolutely have a way to block auto-charges. | ChickenNugger wrote: | I forget which gym but I sent them an email cancellation ("in | writing") and they told me I had to come in. So I cancelled the | card. They had some bullshit agreement with my bank where the | subscription followed to my new card. So I cancelled the _bank | account_. | | Bank accounts don't need to be some terminal relationship. If | they don't treat you right, leave. | | edit: It was Workout Anytime | dangwhy wrote: | Ballys? whatever happened to that shithole. | ChickenNugger wrote: | Workout Anytime | baron816 wrote: | Timeshares too I hope. | ksec wrote: | You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing after | they have tried everything else. - Winston Churchill | _Wintermute wrote: | I don't think America is the outlier here, I've had some | maddening experiences with French companies when I lived there. | You basically have to send them formal recorded letters | threatening them with legal action just to cancel basic things, | and even then they call your bluff and just ignore you 50% of | the time. | gpm wrote: | I wonder if part of the solution here might be to put firm limits | on the period over which subscriptions can auto-renew. That would | limit the upside to these practices. Is there any real societal | benefit to subscriptions lasting years without contact between | the company and the user? | | It should be simple to make it the law that people must | affirmatively re-subscribe every 12 months, contracts saying | otherwise are invalid, and charging someone for an expired | subscription entitles them to twice the money back + $1000 (to | make it worthwhile to fight illegal charges). | dakial1 wrote: | In my third world country (Brazil) we actually have strict | regulations on cancellations (among other consumer focused laws): | | - Companies need to choose at least one channel to work 24 hours | a day seven days a week. - The consumer can only be transferred | from an attendant once. - If the call drops, the attendant must | return the call and complete the service, without the customer | having to repeat everything again. - Phone calls with human | service must be available for at least eight hours a day. | | I'm a particular fan of the "mirror" concept, where | cancelations/returna should work in the same channels and be as | easy as the purchases/subscriptions. | | Consumer laws here are surprisingly good in my opinion and I am | also surprised on how little lobby power consumers have in | developed countries, to be treated like they are, with all the | black hat tactics companies throw at them. | JamesBarney wrote: | Yeah we follow a mirror concept, which is cancelling should be | at least as easy as signing up, and ideally easier. We don't | have 1 click cancellations because we don't have 1 click sign | ups. It requires an hour onboarding to use our service so they | have to send us an email or a message in our chat bat to | trigger a cancellation so we can sure they understand all the | consequences. | mmmmmbop wrote: | I've been in Brazil recently and I was positively surprised | with the great consumer protection laws. | | One law I really liked was the "right to regret", meaning you | can cancel a wide array of contracts within 7 days. For | example, when booking a hotel online, no matter the hotel's | cancellation policies, you can cancel a reservation within 7 | days of making it. | kube-system wrote: | There are many similar laws in the US, but many of them are | fragmented either in different state jurisdictions or for | different types of transactions. | | They're called things like: "cooling-off law", "buyers | remorse law", or "right to cancel" | | Some examples: https://cal.lawsoup.org/legal- | guides/consumer/contract-cance... | monksy wrote: | The funny thing about this, when there is a public conversation | about their practices or legislative process to stop it, | companies (i.e apple, uhg, john deer, Facebook, etc) will cry | floods of tears, claim they'll go out of business due, people | will lose their job, to the extra cost of compliance. They'd | rather keep disadvantaged customers rather than compete and | deliver value. | | All of this while reporting record profits, trying to pr spin | this, and throwing more money than lost with compliance at | lobbyists who will lie and financially influence to the | legislators. | macawfish wrote: | Please do, they're predatory for people with mental health | struggles. | jaynate wrote: | It's even worse for some companies. Planet Fitness makes you go | in to a physical location to cancel. Complete bullshit. | kube-system wrote: | Usually people sign up at gyms that are convenient for them to | physically go to, since that's the entire point. But you can | cancel PF via certified mail. | ElfinTrousers wrote: | As a gym, Planet Fitness is nonsense. As a moneymaking scheme | it's top-notch. | donatj wrote: | I literally canceled my gym membership by cancelling my credit | card. It was easier to update a handful of services on autopay | than go through their daedric rituals of submitting cancellations | by fax 90 days in advance. | | Years later my wife and I signed up for the same gym. She was | later able to cancel by talking to someone in charge and crying | about it. | TAKEMYMONEY wrote: | your credit (FICO) score might take a hit when you close a | card, especially an old one | insane_dreamer wrote: | I did not realize this until I cancelled a card that I'd had | for 15-20 years, much longer than any others, because I'd | switched to another card from the same company (AMEX) and | wasn't using that old card anymore. My score went down quite | a bit, and I was so upset at Amex for not telling me when I | was trying to cancel that old card. I would have just kept it | and not used it. | MrStonedOne wrote: | [dead] | kraquepype wrote: | If you close a particularly young card, it can also bring | your score up if the others are older. Last I looked it used | an average for the age of all your credit lines. | barbazoo wrote: | Virtual cards FTW. Too bad they're not that common here in | Canada. | kazinator wrote: | Nothing is tough to cancel; just nuke the credit card and tell | them to pound sand. | | Never, ever, allow pre-authorized payments out of a bank account. | At most, from a credit card. Use a throwaway credit card number | if you have that available. | | Never share your banking information other than credit card | numbers with any vendor. | | Whenever signing up to pre-authorized payments is optional, make | sure it's easy to revoke before getting into it. | | I only do such a thing for my cell plan, which is a monthly pre- | paid thing. I can go in there and revoke it at any time. If you | have it set on automatic, you get some benefits, like more | gigabytes. | | If post-dated cheques are an option, that's not a bad way to go. | Young people should learn how to write checks. (I'm using both | spellings cheque and check here on purpose.) | | I pay condo management fees via post-dated cheques. I write them | around half a year in advance or so. They cannot cash a cheque | before the date written on it. You can ask for unused cheques | back: they are physical tokens, using copies of which would be | fraud. | | Tip: if you're under forty, ask a baby boomer in your family for | a run down on cheque writing and cashing. | mikestew wrote: | _They cannot cash a cheque before the date written on it._ | | Man, I hate to be [citation needed] Guy, but I don't think | that's true. A quick search only gives me this: | | https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/banking/postdated-check | | I'd doubly-check that before relying on it. | kazinator wrote: | I'm in Canada. (You know, that country that didn't have a | banking crisis in 2008.) | | Here, I'm reasonably confident that banks will not cash a | cheque before the date on it, other than if it slips through | by clerical error. | | My government recommends this: | | https://www.canada.ca/en/financial-consumer- | agency/services/... | | They don't say it can never happen, but if a post-dated | cheque is prematurely cashed, it's a problem, and you can | complain about it to have the payment reversed. You should | complain before the date on the cheque (after which it is | more or less moot). | toast0 wrote: | You can't really rely on it, but if you ask your bank nicely, | they might enforce it and wait to process a postdated check. | My credit union says there's a $15 charge for a postdated | order per check, so I'd rather save my money and provide the | check later. | | It's kind of like stale dated checks; the bank doesn't have | to pay a check that's more than six months old; but you can't | rely on it, the bank can pay that check and if they do, it | will come out of your account; the bank has no duty to you to | not pay stale dated checks. | babyshake wrote: | I don't understand the notion that if you cancel a credit card, a | company can continue to bill you afterwards, unless they are | billing you for a service you have already incurred prior to | being billed (which is pretty rare - most times you pay before | the next month/year of service). Enterprise contracts may add | some more complexity to this, but for standard consumer | subscriptions I can't comprehend why a company is allowed to bill | you for a service once you stop paying for it. | SMAAART wrote: | The principles should be that the same methodology used to signup | should be used to cancel. | | Online signup -> online cancel. | marcell wrote: | I hate uncancellable subscruptions too, but under what authority | can the FTC just ban these subscriptions? I had a similar issue | with their ban on non-competes. | OkayPhysicist wrote: | The authority granted to them by their charter granted them by | Congress. | | "(2) The Commission is hereby empowered and directed to prevent | persons, partnerships, or corporations, except banks, savings | and loan institutions described in section 57a(f)(3) of this | title, Federal credit unions described in section 57a(f)(4) of | this title, common carriers subject to the Acts to regulate | commerce, air carriers and foreign air carriers subject to part | A of subtitle VII of title 49, and persons, partnerships, or | corporations insofar as they are subject to the Packers and | Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended [7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], except | as provided in section 406(b) of said Act [7 U.S.C. 227(b)], | from using unfair methods of competition in or affecting | commerce and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or | affecting commerce." | | Congress has the authority because the Constitution grants them | the power to regulate interstate commerce. | | The Constitution is the root of all authority in the US. | wkat4242 wrote: | Lol the EU has done this years ago. Silent renewals for a year | are forbidden now and so are cancellations that must be hand- | delivered on gold paper on the third Thursday of the month | between 9:00 and 9:05 kinda deals. Cancellations must be | available the in all the same manners a sign-up is. | | The US should really catch up to banning this consumer-hostility. | 1970-01-01 wrote: | I really like the idea of having a hard limit of 'clicks' to get | something done/undone. If it's 4 clicks to subscribe, it should | be no more than 4 to unsubscribe. | CogitoCogito wrote: | I think a better approach is to just require business to accept | certain standard ways of being informed of cancellation. I.e. | they must accept an email, a phone call, a letter, etc. If they | then want to have an even simpler cancellation flow, that is | fine, but they must accept all of these basic methods. This is | how it works in Sweden. | voytec wrote: | Binance next, please[1] | | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34682469 | dwighttk wrote: | What about NYTimes and the only cancel via phone? | idontwantthis wrote: | Fortunately I gave them my PayPal because they randomly signed | me back up for $4.50 a month after I cancelled. I opened a | dispute with PP and they set it straight. | five82 wrote: | They're mentioned in the article. You can cancel by chat now | though. I take advantage of that to renegotiate yearly. | Zetice wrote: | Fucking ChargePoint straight up _ignores_ account cancellation | requests, and honestly at this point my next idea is to reach out | through LinkedIn contacts to their legal team to see wtf I 'm not | understanding here... | __derek__ wrote: | Not sure what state you live in, but file a complaint with your | AG's consumer affairs office. | ejb999 wrote: | had a related - but not quite the same issue - with a vendor, | and was getting _zero_ help from the company trying to get a | refund for a few thousand $$ for a defective product - got | nowhere for weeks - finally resorted to finding the officers of | the company and repeatedly calling them and their spouses at | home, on the weekends in order to get satisfaction - very early | in the morning and very late at night. | | Hated to resort to that, but have no regrets about pissing off | the CEO, CFO and any one else I called at home - and this was | not a small company. | jlund-molfese wrote: | Who could blame you? If the situation was reversed, and you | got a working product, then refused to pay for it, they'd | have no problem sending a debt collector to annoy you as | often and inconveniently as legally possible. | genocidicbunny wrote: | > Hated to resort to that, but have no regrets about pissing | off the CEO, CFO and any one else I called at home | | Personally, the only people they should be pissed off at is | their employees and themselves. Had they not tried screwing | you out of thousands of dollars, you wouldn't have been | forced to escalate; I would get a pretty perverse pleasure | from knowing I made their day worse in a situation like this. | ztetranz wrote: | This is why I pay most bills with a push rather than a pull. | jabbany wrote: | > The proposed 'click to cancel' rule would require companies to | let you cancel a membership in as many steps as it takes to sign | up. | | This is actually a very smart and simple rule and I love the | reciprocity of it---if it takes a click to sign up it must take | no more than a click to cancel; if you want to require months of | advanced notice to cancel, then you also have to wait just as | many months before charging when someone signs up. Tit-for-tat. | | Seems like fair game. | hoistbypetard wrote: | Yep. I've never understood why this wasn't the default, and | making it so after self-regulation failed feels like the right | level of regulatory involvement to me. | jmyeet wrote: | I would support making fixed term contracts for gyms in | particular (plus possibly cable) just plain illegal. There is | absolutely no reason why such places can't charge month-to-month. | None. Even "initiation fees" should be illegal. At least cable | requires a box. | | I read a story recently about Planet Fitness (IIRC). They | realized that certain equipment was popular (eg free weights, | racks) so they could remove that equipment and people stopped | showing up but a good portion of them kept their membership. So | the number of members per location is extraordinarily high. This | is incredibly profitable. | | I, for one, just hate all this adversarial bullshit you have to | deal with on a daily basis. I don't want to fight to cancel | something. It's one reason I don't pay for some publications that | do good reporting because canceling those is notoriously | difficult. So instead they get nothing for me but of course | they've done the math and the people who don't cancel make them | more money than people who don't join because of this. | | Another thing: automatic price rises. Cable is the worst for | this. You can go through a dance of cancelling to get a lower | rate. If you don't your $60 FIOS bill will turn into $150 in a | few years without intervention. | | I'm so tired of the constantly nickle and diming. | jimt1234 wrote: | This situation was actually a lot _worse_ back in the late-90s, | when the consumer internet first got rolling. I recall | conversations with my local ISP and my credit card company that | were just bonkers. | inglor_cz wrote: | It is so wild to read stories about gym subscriptions from here | (Czechia), where gyms mostly work on "prepay principle" (buy 10 | entries or 3 months in advance etc.), or you use a "Multisport | Card" that will let you enter one sports facility a day almost | anywhere in the country. | | I have been frequenting gyms since 1998 and I don't think I have | ever heard of anyone actually signing a contract with a gym and | letting them charge his card. That is just not a part of the | local gym culture, most gyms probably don't even have the | necessary logistical structure in place to handle such contracts | with repeated charges. | polygamous_bat wrote: | One of the most nefarious instances of this I have seen is a | "online mental health counseling" startup that was charging a | non-trivial monthly recurring fee, even though it did not have | any available appointments with a professional in the coming | month. I had to call and haggle for half an hour on behalf of | someone who signed up for the app, and only after putting in | their credit card information was shown that there are no | appointments. | | Shame on the "startup", and absolutely disgusting that we as a | civilized country allow scams targeted towards a vulnerable | population to happen quite legally. | brandall10 wrote: | Wouldn't happen to be Cerebral, would it? | | I was in a similar situation and extremely irate at first when | they said refunds were not an option, but fortunately it | appeared to be an issue with their automated scheduling system. | Once talking to an agent they were able to link me to a | provider that same day. | | On the whole, it's actually been a pretty good experience over | the last year. Trying to get similar counseling/medication | locally was an absolute nightmare at the time... with Cerebral, | everything happened super fast and the counseling I got seemed | on point (ADHD/insomnia). They quickly pause/resume for when | I'm out of the country traveling, no unapproved charges so far. | Eisenstein wrote: | I hope you aren't taking stimulants during the day and then | benzos at night to sleep -- that can be a disaster long term. | nijave wrote: | Had a similar problem with Thrive Market. Non refundable | subscription unless you chose yearly instead of monthly then | the very specific item I wanted was out of stock (among tons of | other things). | Eisenstein wrote: | Why don't you name them? | polygamous_bat wrote: | If I remembered their name I would 100% name and shame them | publicly. Unfortunately it was a while ago during the peak of | the pandemic, and I don't have any email records since I | myself didn't sign up for them. | [deleted] | rodgerd wrote: | Chance are your mental health startup is also flogging your | data for bucks as well. | knodi123 wrote: | uh, HIPAA??? | omginternets wrote: | >Shame on the "startup", and absolutely disgusting that we as a | civilized country allow scams targeted towards a vulnerable | population to happen quite legally. | | The truly dreadful part is that this is precisely the kind of | thing that people with depression, ADHD, and a host of other | psychological conditions are unable to deal with. | bowsamic wrote: | That's the whole point of those kinds of mental health | startups. Get the credit card information of people who don't | have the energy or organisation skills to ensure that they | cancel it, and charge them according to the contract. It's | basically like the gym thing, except instead of hoping you | are rich enough or lazy enough not to cancel, they hope you | are ill enough not to cancel. | dboreham wrote: | Something wrong here: government agency taking action on behalf | of citizens, against corporate overlords?? | waylandsmithers wrote: | So- I'll pose the question from the other side because I've been | in the position before- do you have any moral obligation when you | know for a fact that a paying customer is not using the service | you're providing? | bigmattystyles wrote: | I've often thought this with digital streaming services - a law | that said if you charge for the Month of January and it shows | at the end of the January that not a single stream even | started, then you can't charge for the next month. Not holding | my breath. | young_hopper wrote: | My gut would say it's not really your responsibility to prompt | the cancellation as long as you're not actively trying to make | it hard to do. That is, in this situation you'd be accountable | but not responsible. | | On the flip side, as a consumer, doing something like | automatically pausing a subscription if it's not actively being | used would make me think highly of your company | hoistbypetard wrote: | I think very highly of fubo precisely because they warn me to | cancel my sports add-on packages once the season for the | things I regularly watch has passed. | lax4ever wrote: | To preface, nothing against the poster since I know they were | just copying the article title. | | This article headline is a bit misleading, as the FTC is not | looking to ban the subscriptions themselves. Rather, they would | like to implement a rule that requires servicers that provide | subscriptions to make it as easy to cancel as it is to enroll, | rather than the current jumbling mess that is trying to cancel | something like a gym, Amazon, news, cable, or other subscription | where servicers try to maintain retention by putting in a | ridiculous number of hoops to jump through to cancel. | halJordan wrote: | It's not a misleading title, it would be verboten to offer | certain subscriptions. Which subscriptions? The tough to cancel | ones. There are subscriptions offered today which would not be | allowed to be offered. | lax4ever wrote: | Servicers could change the cancellation process without ever | changing the subscription itself. The issue at hand is not | the subscription, but the process with which one would cancel | it. | f272529 wrote: | "Tough to cancel subscriptions" and "not tough to cancel | subscriptions" are both subsets of "all subscriptions". | | If the FTC has their way and the rules are effective, | "tough to cancel subscriptions" no longer exist, and any | subscriptions that previously belonged to that set now | exist in the "not tough to cancel subscriptions" set. | | Effectively banning them. | | That's how I interpret the title. | lax4ever wrote: | Which I believe actually helps to illustrate my point. | The issue the FTC appears to have (and this comes from | more than just this article) is with the cancellation | process and not the subscription itself. The subscription | is far more than just the cancellation process, just as a | hard to find book is more than just its ease of | acquisition. The enrollment (and if the FTC has their | way, cancellation) processes of subscriptions are such a | minor attribute to the subscriptions themselves that | defining them by that attribute alone in an article | headline seems like poor authorship. | | Is there some measure of semantics involved here? Quite | probably, but then I say that in the world of | professional writing and journalism I would expect a | higher level of aptitude and proficiency. Being able to | write headlines or article titles that remove as much of | the semantic fuel as possible is, I believe, not an | unreasonable request (or even requirement) for such | professions, unless that is what the author is trying to | achieve. | Mizoguchi wrote: | Go gettem. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-23 23:00 UTC)