[HN Gopher] Your reading should be messy ___________________________________________________________________ Your reading should be messy Author : ingve Score : 52 points Date : 2023-03-26 07:27 UTC (15 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.robinrendle.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.robinrendle.com) | huijzer wrote: | I couldn't agree more. I listen to multiple audiobooks sort of | intermittently plus multiple podcasts and it's great to have such | a mess. It's about processing the information. What's the point | of reading a book if you don't plan to remember it! Even fiction | should be memorable I hope | exmadscientist wrote: | In fact, _everything_ should be treated this way. Yes, you | shouldn 't abuse stuff (which is a very fine line -- sometimes | being very harsh on a tool can save your ass, is that abuse or | just the tool rising to the occasion?), but it's always meant to | be used. Objects fall into two categories: | | 1. Things meant to be preserved so future generations can have | them, just as you have them now. | | 2. Things meant to be used. | | (A third category, things meant to appreciate in value, is so | close to #1 that it's not worth separating out.) | | Use your stuff. That's what it's for. Who do you respect more, | the mechanic with a toolbox full of pristine tools without a | single scratch, or the one with a box full of battered, dinged-up | tools? This article's library full of factory-new books, or one | full of creased, dog-eared, broken-spined books? Which child's | toy had the better life, the one that's indistinguishable from | new or the one that's indistinguishable from a pile of scraps and | fluff? | | Use. Your. Stuff. It's what it's for. | GlumWoodpecker wrote: | Category 3: Anything that isn't disposable or a tool. Most | stuff can be of value to others once you are done using it. I | treat all my stuff with care, because some day I might want to | sell it, or give it away to someone. Whether it's a book, | electronics, kitchenware, or furniture doesn't really matter; | The value of the item (in money or in usefulness to the | recipient) will always be higher the better condition something | is in. You also are less likely to have to buy replacement | items if you are careful with them in the first place. I agree | in that you shouldn't treat everything like porcelain, but | there is definitely value in treating your things with care. | pessimizer wrote: | I think you meant for 2, "Things meant to be used up." You use | the things in category 1, too. | | For me, category one includes all of my books. Category two | consists almost entirely of food, cleaning and hygiene | products, and most bedding and underwear. | | I got most of my books after they had been purchased and | probably read, I don't know why I should assume I was the end | of the line. [edit: I mean, I have books and things that I know | have had multiple owners; I've got books from Bell Labs' | library that were lent out a few dozen times and touched by | many more hands. Why should I scribble in them and treat them | like shit again? Instead of treating them like shit, I'd rather | just destroy them in a careful scanning process.] | | > Who do you respect more, the mechanic with a toolbox full of | pristine tools without a single scratch, or the one with a box | full of battered, dinged-up tools? | | If by "respect" you mean would rather hire, I'd rather hire the | third guy with the well-used, very well-taken care of tools. | Why would I hire a slob that isn't maintaining their equipment? | catiopatio wrote: | I use my stuff, carefully, and it lasts. | | My childhood toys were often nearly indistinguishable from new, | but that's not because I didn't spend eons playing with them. | | When I outgrew them, they were passed on and enjoyed just as | much by the next child. | | In my experience, there are two different potential meanings | behind the saying "stuff is meant to be used": | | (1) Stuff is meant to be used, so don't sweat the minor | scratches, dings, and wear that comes from using it well. | | (2) Stuff is meant to be used, so don't criticize me for my | absolute lack of care when I use things. | | I'm very much in camp (1), and I don't have a lot of respect | for camp (2). It's wantonly wasteful, and prevents passing down | and reusing possessions. | thenerdhead wrote: | Some books are not good enough to be messy with. But those that | are good enough are either scribbled in everywhere or left in | pristine condition while taking notes elsewhere to not disgrace | the masterpiece. | cutler wrote: | Disagree completely. My copy of "Programming Perl" 4th edition is | still in pristine condition after two readings and I prefer it | that way. My favourite tech books all have plastic jackets which | I ordered individually for each book. | pessimizer wrote: | I actually disagree _except_ in the case of programming | /software books. Unless the book is for an unusual example or | early version of a language or piece of software, it's going | into the landfill in 5 years no matter what. | cardanome wrote: | Books are expensive. | | Sure, I am currently earning enough money to be able to afford | messing up my books if I wanted to but it feels so wasteful. | Feels so weird to purposely vandalize your own stuff. I prefer | making notes in a separate medium and keeping my books clean. | | I like being able to gift or sell my books to other people. Plus, | I might want to re-read them and I really dislike having any | annotations in them. I feel like it would stop me from having a | "fresh read". | cocacola1 wrote: | I feel the opposite. Writing in a book is the final step in | really making it mine. Not writing in it seems to be an insult | to the author, that what they wrote isn't important enough to | engage with (though some are that bad). | cardanome wrote: | How did you grow up that you could develop that habit though? | | Thinking about my childhood, the vast majority of the books I | read were from libraries. School books were also all lend | from school. Sure, I also owned plenty of books myself but my | parents would have been pretty pissed if I vandalized them as | my siblings might want to read them. | | For me books where always something to share not something to | own. Never got the need to make them "my own". | pessimizer wrote: | I take pride in _not_ making them my own, and that other | people will have them after I 'm dead, and the books will | be _theirs._ I 've been taking care of some books for 40 | years now. Plenty of those I got because someone else took | care of them for 40 years before me. If anything, I feel | guilty when I accidentally buy bad books that no one in the | future would want to read. | | Honestly, when people who take care of their things die, | it's like an explosion of wealth. The things in my place | range from the mid-19th century to today. If you let people | pick through my shit and take something that looks cool, my | death could result in 1000 smiles. | | edit: I even take care of the things that I've _made._ They | 're no doubt _mine_ , but some of those things will make | someone else just as happy as they've made me. | pedrosbmartins wrote: | It seems you are mistaking the actual book (a story, an | exposition of a subject, etc.) for the printed set of cover | and pages, which is only a physical instance of the book | itself. Writing your notes in a separate medium is _just as | much engaging_ with the book as writing in the margins of a | physical copy. It 's a matter of taste really, but definitely | not an insult to the author! | DDayMace wrote: | I think it really depends on the book, type of printing and its | purpose. You might have a first edition you never open and read | the kindle instead, have a cheap paperback for the beach that has | sand and water wrinkles, or you might have a well used out of | print tech book that you are gentle with in the hopes it will | last longer than you do. If someone wants a display quality | hardback to line their living room bookshelf to impress guests or | accent their video meeting background, so what? | | Life is too short to read everything. Read what keeps your | interest, page by page. If a book bores you, don't finish it. | Sell it, give it to a friend, drop it off at goodwill, let it | gather dust. So what? Just my two cents. | namaria wrote: | I've always felt that the contents of books are precious. I | always go for the cheapest copy I can find so I can get my hands | on as many books as possible. And the more worn a book is, more | of it's content has made its way into my brain =) | Ferret7446 wrote: | I think we should break down this topic further. | | One of the key contention points is whether one respects the | book/author by keeping the book pristine vs marking it (or | whether the book as a physical object deserves respect). This is | purely subjective, and has a historical precedent. Books used to | be freaking expensive, so of course you would want to preserve | it. Now, most books can be printed cheaply, but some people still | like to keep their possessions clean. There are many other | examples of this divide, like how people use their tools, pots, | kitchens, cars, laptops, etc. | | The other is whether actively engaging with the book helps with | understanding and recall. I don't think there is much | disagreement on this point, but this does not require marking the | physical book. You can use post-it notes and such, but in the | digital age, arguably marking a physical book is inferior to | annotating a digital copy and cross-hyperlinking it with other | books and your personal knowledge base. Unfortunately both the | technology and copyright law is lacking in this area as far as | I'm aware, but rather than debating whether to write in physical | books, I think everyone would benefit from innovating on the | digital side of things. | igloo_ghost wrote: | I make highlights in Calibre and export them as markdown to | make it part of my knowledge management system | the_af wrote: | If you scribble one of my books, I'll kill you. I don't | understand people who do this. | | Other than that, I agree that books want to be handled. I read a | lot of books and I also re-read a lot, and my books look worn. I | also accept bending pages to remember where you left the story; I | never have bookmarks handy. | | But scribbling? No, you're banned from my house. | pessimizer wrote: | > I also accept bending pages to remember where you left the | story; I never have bookmarks handy. | | I decided about 20 years ago I wasn't going to use bookmarks | anymore. If I can't find where I was, I need to reread from | whatever I recognize. If I can't figure out a place to drop in | and understand what's going on, I should just start over from | the beginning (it'll probably be faster the second time | anyway.) I also really hate dogears; they crack off in about 10 | years or so. | cocacola1 wrote: | This seems to be about scribbling in your own books though, not | someone elses. | the_af wrote: | Yes, I understand. I disagree with scribbling in your own | books because (I found) scribblers often forget and do it in | the books I lend them. Also, I inherited books from my aunt, | who was a heavy scribbler, and it annoys me. It has a factor | of having a connection to her, which I appreciate... but I | also find her scribblings distracting. | | Plus "your own books" are never truly just your own. In the | example from the author of TFA, they are _his family 's_. I | wouldn't have wanted my brother's or parent's scribblings in | books from our family bookshelves! | iamerroragent wrote: | Writing in the margins is a thing I believe many a scribe has | done for many generations | | It's recognized as a study aid. Especially if you're re- | reading or studying a lot of material on a subject and need | to go back. You can easily see what your past self was | thinking or maybe quickly find a part you found interesting. | | It's fundamentally useful to write up your own books. | the_af wrote: | I never found useful to write up my own books. I find it | ruins them for other people, too. | iamerroragent wrote: | Suit yourself. | | It is just one tool among many for the acquisition and | retention of knowledge. | | I like used books with notes in it. It's interesting to | see what someone previously reading felt was important or | to glimpse into the past life of book itself. | catiopatio wrote: | I keep my own notebooks for my own notes. I don't need to | scribble all over a book and ruin it for the next reader. | dustingetz wrote: | buy a 500 pack of bookmarks on amazon and sprinkle them around | at all your reading spots, all of my books get their own | bookmark | the_af wrote: | I usually get a free bookmark with every book I buy, but soon | misplace them. Bending pages is the one sin I allow myself | without much guilt. The damage is very light anyway. | lfciv wrote: | My personal take is books read better when they're "read". That | is, when they've been used time and again. I tried switching to | Kindle, but I found that I read less. | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | My pepere has a worn copy of _On the Road_ by Kerouac near his | chair that he often opens to an random page and begins reading. | lfciv wrote: | Funny I sometimes do the same with my copy of _The Hitchhiker | 's Guide to the Galaxy_ | photochemsyn wrote: | If you really like a book, you can get a nice archival copy on | printed on acid-free paper and only read it while wearing special | gloves, and also a working copy that you outline in and scribble | in the margins and spill coffee on. | ghaff wrote: | Yeah. Not to criticize anyone else's take but, unless something | is some variant of a "coffee table book" meant to be | appreciated in part for its form, anything is fair game. Most | cookbooks I regularly use have scribbling in the margins as | well as reference books of other sorts. I have zero issue with | taking notes in a paperback. Perhaps obviously, I like/prefer | ebooks for a lot of purposes too. | | The form of some books is a lot of the experience and in | general I won't mess that up by writing in them. But most are | about the words and I don't consider the form sacrosanct in any | way. | oweiler wrote: | Me and my son had a lot of fun "reading" this book | | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/428862.Wreck_This_Journa... | slickdork wrote: | When I was a teen, I heard an author say they loved signing | clearly well worn copies of their books. Not only did it mean it | was not likely going to be resold, but it also meant it was well | loved. I've always treated my books roughly since then. | | I always carry a paperback in my back pocket, and it's often | margin written and beer stained. My favorite books get the worst | treatment. | cocacola1 wrote: | The only books I do treat pristinely are those from the library - | then, I write on a different page, as well as special copies e.g. | I have an annotated and illustrated _The Hobbit_ , as well as an | old paperback. The latter would be written in. | | But for books I own, I almost always annotate, highlight, mark | up, write in, etc. however I want. I forgot who said it - | probably Mortimer J. Adler - but writing in a book and engaging | with it is the highest compliment you can pay to an author. T | gerdesj wrote: | The article does not capitalize all the words in its title. | Reading is in Berkshire, reading is a gerund. | ZoomZoomZoom wrote: | The fact that you treat your books with respect by using them | properly doesn't mean you're not going to read and maybe even | love some of them. | | Knowing how to open a new book, how to turn pages properly, | keeping your hands clean when you handle them, knowing how to | wrap a book in a protective cover when you take it with you, and | keeping the notes in your notebooks where they belong is | essential. Little things like that is what human culture is made | of. | jjice wrote: | > is essential | | I like the sentiment, but I think there is a healthy middle | ground and really the right answer is for the owner of the book | to treat it however they feel brings them the most job. | sbaiddn wrote: | "knowing how to wrap a book in a protective cover when you take | it with you, " | | Did you grow up in a poor country? My mom used to do that when | I was a kid. After we moved to N America I only saw it done | once. | | Its actually quite lovely. | stametseater wrote: | When I was a kid my mother used to help me wrap all my | textbooks, although we didn't do that with other books. It | seemed typical at the time (in America btw) but it might be a | dying practice as textbooks go digital and schools give kids | ipads instead. | pessimizer wrote: | I don't know how old everyone is, but in the 80s (in the | US) we would make covers for our textbooks with brown paper | grocery bags. It wasn't affectionate; at the end of the | year they charged you for damage (it was before modern | hyperdisposable capitalism, and the same books would be | used for years and multiple students.) | sakras wrote: | People who write in books: what do you write? I remember being | forced to write on sticky notes in high school, and trying | several times afterwards, and I just don't get it. I see the | phrase "engaging with the writing" thrown around by proponents. | What does "engaging" mean here? | | In regards to letting books get scuffed up, I must say I disagree | as well. I like to keep all of my things shiny and new, and my | books are no exception. | japhyr wrote: | I have a few different ways of marking up a text. In one | approach, I make a small vertical line in the margin next to a | line I find significant. Sometimes that vertical line extends | down a few lines to mark a longer passage. If it's really | important, I add a second line, and sometimes I'll even add a | third line. | | For many books, this is just a way of mentally noting something | and letting it go enough to move on. But if I end up wanting to | write a review of a book (usually a blog post, not a bookstore | review), I just skim through these marked up sections. That's | usually enough to guide my write up. The triple-marked sections | usually end up quoted in the review. | | I also write a capital R in the margin next to things I'd like | to research further. Sometimes I put a question mark next to a | section I'm skeptical of. | Transfinity wrote: | I don't usually write in fiction, but with nonfiction and | especially technical writing (like O'Reilly books) I find | taking notes helpful, and the book itself is the most | convenient place up do so. I'll underline important words or | phrases, ask questions, raise concerns, recall definitions from | earlier. | | I find doing this helps keep me honest about whether I'm | understanding what I'm reading or just glossing through it, and | it helps pace my engagement. If I can't come up with one | question or comment per page, I've probably lost focus. | skydhash wrote: | Engaging means thinking about the author's words as in you're | in a debate/discussion. You may agree, but notice something you | need to research more about. You may disagree and not down why | you do. You may want to summarize the point he is making. You | may want to link it to another work. For myself, I don't really | do it if I'm new to the subject, maybe a few lines about each | chapter. But once I've read a few different books, I'm starting | to form my own opinion or try to link concepts across books. | This is what my notes are about. | pessimizer wrote: | Why would you write those notes _in_ the book? To find the | note, you 'd have to find the thing you were writing the note | about (i.e. the passage on the page), so then what do you | need the note for? | voltaireodactyl wrote: | The idea is when you return to that idea, you already have | some context of where it lead you last time you read. | Returning to that later allows you to keep building. | examplary_cable wrote: | Has anyone here heart of "incremental reading"? | | The concept of breaking a book into "chunks" and then | individually scheduling those chunks to be read via an spaced | repetition algorithm. The thing is that incremental reading is | much harder to do with physical books. And you would have to | either calculate the next schedule(hard) or use a simple leinter | box system(loss of efficiency). | | I wonder if normal reading is this "pristine" reading and | incremental reading being the "messy" reading. | [deleted] | kayodelycaon wrote: | Is this a good time to mention I replaced my library with a | kindle some time ago? ^^ | | (Someone was going to say it.) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-26 23:00 UTC)