[HN Gopher] Carl Braun on communicating like a grown-up (2016) ___________________________________________________________________ Carl Braun on communicating like a grown-up (2016) Author : yamrzou Score : 52 points Date : 2023-03-29 11:00 UTC (12 hours ago) (HTM) web link (fs.blog) (TXT) w3m dump (fs.blog) | fwlr wrote: | " If then we speak up for some better job that's open, let's not | till our talk with such words as hoping, thanking, eagerly, | favor. If we are really worthy of the job, the Company will | benefit by giving it to us every bit as much as we will profit by | getting it." | | Good advice for job applications. "I'm grateful for this | opportunity" is common-place but so much less appealing than "I'm | confident we're going to get great results". | samgtx wrote: | Oh HN is going to love this. | | > A somewhat more subtle form of negation, is refinement of | measurement. One man says that a tank weights ninety tons. And | for that particular discussion, accuracy is of no consequence. | Yet someone's ego speaks up and says, Ninety-two tons. Maybe he's | right at that. But he's wrong just the same. [...] This is a | favorite husband-and-wife game. Let's be on guard against it. | | > The worst trick our ego can play on us, is to demand that we | know everything. Let's discipline ourselves until it's easy to | say, I don't know. And let's keep out of discussions when they're | on subjects outside of our recognized sphere. Our lack of real | knowledge and experience is bound to display itself, and bring | resentment from those who are really qualified to speak. Let's | slap our ego down whenever it starts laying claim to knowledge | that's too various. | | > If we want our opinions or beliefs to be accepted, the worst | thing that we can do is to press too hard for them, or to make a | personal issue of them. Better not crowd for acceptance, but | rather invite it. Better tender our advice with a softening It | seems to me. Or an It appears. Or a Perhaps. Or with some similar | concession to the ideas of our listener. True, there are times | when we must speak as authorities in no uncertain terms. Even | then, reasonable humility is seldom amiss. | | > With our eye on our brother's ego, we'll see that concession is | the very cornerstone of good human relations. We cannot reach | human agreements without mutual concession. The self-respect that | every man feels impelled to maintain, demands that he appear at | least partly right. Therefore, let's not ever try to prove anyone | wholly wrong. Let's find something herein we can feel that he's | right. Then let's say so. We simply must not build up our own ego | at any unnecessary expense of our brother's ego. Let's keep an | eye on concession. | [deleted] | Animats wrote: | See the military five-paragraph order format.[1] It's boring, but | useful. | | The military requires that orders show "commander's intent". This | matters when circumstances change and some subordinate has to | adapt the plan. "The enemy gets a vote." Officers and noncoms are | then expected to change plans to achieve the commander's intent | by other means. It's not about blind obedience. | | USMC doctrine: | | _Mission tactics are just as the name implies: the tactic of | assigning a subordinate mission without specifying how the | mission must be accomplished. We leave the manner of | accomplishing the mission to the subordinate, thereby allowing | him the freedom and establishing the duty to take whatever steps | he deems necessary based on the situation._ | | _The senior prescribes the method of execution only to the | degree that is essential for coordination. It is this freedom for | initiative that permits the high tempo of operations that we | desire. Uninhibited by restrictions from above, the subordinate | can adapt his actions to the changing situation. He informs his | commander what he has done, but he does not wait for permission._ | | _It is obvious that we cannot allow decentralized initiative | with- out some means of providing unity, or focus, to the various | efforts. To do so would be to dissipate our strength. We seek | unity, not through imposed control, but through harmonious | initiative and lateral coordination._ | | _We achieve this harmonious initiative in large part through the | use of the commander's intent. There are two parts to a mission: | the task to be accomplished and the reason, or intent. The task | describes the action to be taken while the intent describes the | desired result of the action. Of the two, the intent is | predominant. While a situation may change, making the task | obsolete, the intent is more permanent and continues to guide our | actions. Under- standing our commander's intent allows us to | exercise initiative in harmony with the commander's desires._ [2] | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_paragraph_order | | [2] https://theusmarines.com/wp- | content/uploads/docs/FMFM_1-1.pd... | p1necone wrote: | "The enemy gets a vote." is an amazingly succinct way of | putting this. | DoreenMichele wrote: | _Assume good motives_ (often called _assume good faith_ on HN) is | an excellent standard to follow with one proviso: It can be taken | too far. | | If you don't know their motives, assume good motives or good | faith. But if they explicitly tell you they have hostile motives | or the preponderance of the evidence suggests such, continuing to | assume good faith amounts to cutting your own throat. | TehShrike wrote: | Anyone have a lead on a digital version of "Presentation For | Engineers And Industrialists"? I haven't had any luck so far. | haunter wrote: | Libgen | yamrzou wrote: | It's surprising that the Libgen book has "Digitized by | Google". I wonder how users got it. Can Google Books be | scraped in some way? | precompute wrote: | It must have been on Archive.org at some point. | lstamour wrote: | Or https://www.hathitrust.org/digital_library though it | usually has limited access, which is unfortunate... One | free method of access is a Library of Congress reader | card, fyi. | yamrzou wrote: | It is the same, indeed. Thanks! | funnym0nk3y wrote: | I would like the work environment to be like that. | | But honestly I think all those things are just one half of the | story. He favours a quieter approach, which I could image lead to | being overseen. | precompute wrote: | They are rules for a more civilized age. I'm sure they weren't | allowed to play music on the radio or be interrupted by a phone | while working, either (phones did not exist, I know). The | managers probably didn't doomscroll on their phones. You | couldn't backstab someone in secret. Everyone knew who the | other guys in the office talked to. You had jobs that, if you | stayed long enough, paid you a pension. You left your family | alone, trusted the neighbourhood much more and it's likely many | of your colleagues lived near you. Your corporation probably | had to deliver results, couldn't bs its way out. | | With a new axis for communication (phones with constant | internet access) all these rules have been discarded forever. | p1necone wrote: | I think you're looking through rose tinted glasses about the | backstabbing and knowing who people talked to stuff. I | suspect office politics in a form somewhat similar to today | have existed since offices were invented. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-29 23:00 UTC)