[HN Gopher] Original Prusa MK4 ___________________________________________________________________ Original Prusa MK4 Author : oztamir Score : 176 points Date : 2023-03-29 17:15 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.prusa3d.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.prusa3d.com) | sho_hn wrote: | So I would really like to get into 3D printing, but I struggle | with discomfort over the health implications. I live in a small | rented apartment and can't easily work out space or, much more | importantly, external venilation. Yes, I've looked into PLA vs. | ABS, I've looked into enclosures with carbon/HEPA filters, etc., | but I still don't want to have it in my living space without a | vent to the outdoors. | | Here's the best I can come up with: A well-insulated enclosure | with a filter ... on the balcony, with internal heating and PID | temp control. Maybe some thing for humidity control as well. | Thoughts? Any good off-the-shelf enclosure products that would | fit an Ender S1 Pro or a Prusa MK3/4? | latchkey wrote: | Box around the printer with a vent/fan blowing outside. It'll | be negative pressure in the box, so everything should just vent | out. Even if you can just crack a window and get the airflow | going out the window... you can push a flexible tube far out | onto your balcony... | levpopov wrote: | This is the best way. Inline duct fan and a flex hose running | out of your window (you can print an adapter/connector to fit | perfectly). It works very well even if your enclosure is not | airtight (and it shouldn't be when printing PLA since you | want a constant stream of air getting inside for cooling) - | just let negative pressure do its thing. | numpad0 wrote: | Kind of depends on ventilation setup in your house, some | houses/condos are built to draw air through windows and out | through fans with high static pressures, in which case | trying to vent out don't work that well. | | I tried it with SLA printer and it just filled the room | with resin stinks for days. It really depends... | sho_hn wrote: | It may seem super silly or I'm just somehow dumb, but the | "run a hose to your balcony" is the difficult part for me. | That means having a door open for 10+ hours at a time, | which is a climate control challenge for the room. | | That's why I figured: Why not put the entire enclosure on | the balcony, and then heat-humidity control the inside of | it? Sure, more complex system and higher power draw, ... | but maybe there's whole kits for this? Like, for keeping a | 3D printer in a windy shed? | latchkey wrote: | 6" wide piece of cardboard that is floor to ceiling of | the balcony door. Put it on the side where the door | locks. Cut a hole near the bottom of it and stick the | flexible tubing through it. Now you can shut the door and | hold the cardboard in, while still maintaining the | climate control. | | You can use something thicker than cardboard like the | plastic version of cardboard... google: 'Corrugated | Plastic Polycarbonate Acrylic Sheets'. | | I was also thinking that you can even extend a pole out | your balcony and attach the tube to that. This way, the | air makes it far enough out that it won't even blow back. | sho_hn wrote: | I appreciate this, the challenge is that the wife won't | let me get away with that level of jank (the balcony door | opens into the living room) ... :-) | | In the next life I'll get a house and build it _around_ | the 3D printer. | latchkey wrote: | You can do it non-jank. I just realized there are | products for this (mostly around portable AC exhaust | vents). Google 'sliding door vent kit'. | | https://www.amazon.com/sliding-door-vent- | kit/s?k=sliding+doo... | | > In the next life I'll get a house and build it around | the 3D printer. | | Or just 3d print a new wife? (joking) | sho_hn wrote: | That _does_ look not-so-bad, but ... unfortunately we | also don 't have a sliding door. Nor sliding windows. | Germany goes for those mechanically complicated multi- | direction tilt/swing hinges instead. They're super mental | (and metal), and break my aspirations. | | I know, I'm not an easy customer. | | > Or just 3d print a new wife? (joking) | | I've seen too many terrible Benchys in reviews to fall | for this one! | newaccount74 wrote: | I worried about the same thing, and decided to print only PLA | and PETG and print without enclosure. The printer is in the | living room, and I just close the doors to the bedrooms and | open the windows in the morning to let fresh air in. | | I think it's questionable how much those tiny filters help | anyway. If you print a lot, you would have to constantly swap | filters, if you don't print a lot, it doesn't really make that | much of a difference. | | When I want to print ABS, I go to a Makerspace and use their | Ultimaker. | codyv wrote: | Prusa does have an official enclosure but I'm not sure of its | MK4 compatibility. https://www.prusa3d.com/product/original- | prusa-enclosure-3/ | Lukas_Skywalker wrote: | It is compatible: | | > MK4 is fully compatible with the Original Prusa Enclosure. | nvahalik wrote: | You may be able to get by with a regular air filtration system. | Not sure where you are, but I have a Rabbit Air[0] that is very | good at removing smells has multi-layer filtration. | | Also, buying good quality filament is important. You want stuff | that isn't made in China. | | [0]: https://www.rabbitair.com | LordHeini wrote: | My FDM printer is not stinky enough to cause a big problem | (might be still unhealthy though). | | But i recently got a resin printer and that thing lives in the | bathroom now beside the washing machine. It has build in | ventilation through a coal filter but the stench is just awful. | | In a pinch Bathrooms are not the worst place for printers | because they have ventilation and are not in use most of the | day. | | Just don't store your filament in the same room since it might | get wet from the showers steam. | | Although this might have a very low WAF, so check with your | better half if applicable :) | thelazyone wrote: | >But i recently got a resin printer and that thing lives in | the bathroom now beside the washing machine. It has build in | ventilation through a coal filter but the stench is just | awful. | | It's also worth noting that the smell varies considerably | between different kinds of resin. having a dedicated space is | optimal, but with the right materials it's farily manageable, | especially if you're not planning to run it 24/7. | hengheng wrote: | Creality has this $60 enclosure that seems to do the job. I | learned that the entire voron project is against separate | heaters, they recommend to leave the heated bed on for an hour | instead. | donio wrote: | How about using a printing service instead? | precompute wrote: | If you can shell out a little more, you might be able to print | a Nevermore filter[1] and use activated carbon to filter VOCs, | provided your printer is enclosed. | | You could also buy a Bambu Labs P1P, which is fully enclosed, | or build a Voron. There's also the Creality Sermoon V1, but | with chinese printers you always have to replace / upgrade the | parts, so they're really not that cheap in the long run. | | 1: https://github.com/nevermore3d/Nevermore_Micro | bmitc wrote: | Just a note that the P1P does not come fully enclosed. You | need to either print your own sides or buy them from someone. | I don't think Bambu Lab even sells them, and even then they | are just side panels and don't include the front. The Bambu | Lab X1 Carbon comes fully enclosed, however. It is one of the | main reasons that I am considering just going for the X1 | Carbon. If the P1P had a fully enclosed option, I would go | for it. | precompute wrote: | Thanks for the correction, I wrote that post off the top of | my head. I definitely meant the X1, that's the printer I | had in mind. | | And anyway, if you're printing PLA you shouldn't do it in a | completely closed enclosure, the temperature would be too | high (or so I've read). Even the Sermoon V1 has cutouts for | a small vent at the back. Even the Vorons aren't fully | enclosed, although there's the Box-Zero[1] addon that does | fully enclose the printer. | | 1: https://github.com/zruncho3d/BoxZero | Symbiote wrote: | I put the printer on a study Ikea wheeled table, and put it in | the bathroom when I use it. The ventilating fan in the bathroom | is sufficient. | hirundo wrote: | I would be as concerned about the health implications of the | sound. The constant background noise adds to the baseline | stress level of the environment, and it's difficult not to | intersect printing and sleep schedules. | | So I recently moved mine from the middle my medium sized house | to the far end from the bedroom, behind a door. And even with | that I'm considering enclosing it in a cabinet, to reduce the | noise on that side of the house too. Yet the model I have is | not particularly loud. | Symbiote wrote: | The Mk3S (so presumably the Mk4) has a silent mode, which | cuts down the noise significantly. I have mine on a | 5cmx25x25cm paving slab which also helps avoid vibrations. | | With a closed door between my bedroom and the printer at | night, it's no problem. | polishdude20 wrote: | The 70% print time reduction seems like a game changer. Any way | to do this with the MK3S? | newaccount74 wrote: | It says high speed printing will come in a firmware update... | Have they released remote printing support for the Prusa mini | yet? | Karliss wrote: | The update with wifi support for Prusa mini was released ~3-4 | months ago. Or are you referring to something else? | 2muchcoffeeman wrote: | There's also various upgrade kits from the 3 to 3.5, 3.9 and 4. | | Here is the full kit https://www.prusa3d.com/product/original- | prusa-i3-mk3-s-to-m... | HeavenFox wrote: | Sadly at $579 that is almost the price of a full printer at | $799. | | May as well buy the full printer and sell the old one :( | bilsbie wrote: | Has anyone figured out remote slicing? | | I'd love to just click print on a thingiverse page and have my | printer start going. | infthi wrote: | 3dprinteros has an online slicer. So, assuming you are happy | with the default profile and the printer is online, you can go | "Upload stl" -> "next" -> "next" -> "next" -> "print". | metal_am wrote: | You can get kinda close to that with OctoPrint running on a | RaspberryPi. You'll still have to slice it manually, but you | can upload the gcode and start the print from another browser | tab. | fanatic2pope wrote: | If you have OctoPrint, you can make it even easier by setting | up remote printing directly from PrusaSlicer, so you can | upload and print with a single click. This is how I have my | mini setup and it works well. | | https://forum.prusa3d.com/forum/prusaslicer/guide-config- | pru... | dotnet00 wrote: | There are so many variables which one might want to tweak | depending on their specific use case that it seems a bit | difficult to boil it down to one-click. | | Especially with slicers still introducing all sorts of | improvements which might need tuning of their own to adapt to | older designs. | Kirby64 wrote: | Options have existed for awhile, but unless you have the | specific slicing profile in mind (which is NOT the same for | every file; some might need supports... some you might not care | about quality, etc), it's not going to be one-size-fits-all. | | As others have mentioned, the closet is using something like | PrusaSlicer and using 'Upload and start print'. You do the | slicing manually, then you just press a button and it uploads | the gcode and starts printing. | tlonny wrote: | God damn it - I just bought a MK3... | Symbiote wrote: | The announcement article says people who bought a Mk3S within | the last month will receive a voucher for $150 or $200 which | could be put towards the upgrade kit (or, I assume, filament | etc). | | https://blog.prusa3d.com/announcing-original-prusa-mk4_76585... | tlonny wrote: | Thanks for the heads up! | Francis2023 wrote: | Replaced all 25 MKS3+ machines with 15 Bambu P1Ps and 5 Bambu | X1C's about 2 months ago. Sold the last Mks3+ yesterday. | | They Print 3 Times faster than the MKS3+ with same or better | quality in some prints. 24/7 printing almost with zero issues in | my print farm. BVery easy to send jobs to it from the Bambu | slicer based on the Prusa slicer which is open source and | enhanced to make complicated print jobs spread across multiple | virtual print beds a beautiful thing! | | At this point i see ZERO reason to consider a MK4. Bambu hit this | out of the ball park and into the neighbouring city as far as I | am concerned. | postalrat wrote: | You created an account just to say you aren't going to buy | something? | gjsman-1000 wrote: | Prusa mentions in their articles about how China slowly | appropriated solar panel designs, beat domestic companies on | cost, and now all solar panels are made in China. And that, | they hope, they can avoid this for 3D Printers in particular | because Chinese companies do not have a good track record for | following open-source licenses promptly. | | However, I see all this and think, man... Prusa, you were 2 | years too late on the XL and the MK4. And it's going to hurt | the Prusa marketshare immensely. | latchkey wrote: | It'll be interesting to watch the Aurora Tech review when it | comes out. Curious to see how she likes it. | rcarmo wrote: | Yep. We enjoy her reviews a lot. | rhinoceraptor wrote: | These look like very solid improvements over the MK3S+ (I | personally have two MK3S+, and use them a lot), and I love their | commitment to open hardware and for making upgrade kits | available, but it's a bit disappointing to see still how far | Prusa is behind truly next-gen printers like the Bambu Lab | X1-Carbon. | LeafItAlone wrote: | > how far Prusa is behind truly next-gen printers like the | Bambu Lab X1-Carbon | | Can you expand on this? | rhinoceraptor wrote: | The biggest disadvantage in my mind of the Prusa MK2/3/4 | printers is they use the original i3 design. It's a good | design, and very simple to build, maintain and program. But | it limits the print speed due to the amount of mass that has | to move, particularly in the Y axis. The entire bed has to | move which induces vibrations at higher speeds. | | Newer printers (including the Prusa XL) use a CoreXY design, | where the extruder is controlled in the X and Y axes by | belts, which results in less mass that has to move, and | allows the printer to print much, much faster. In the case of | the Bambu Lab printers, it can be two to three times faster | for a similar print quality. | eropple wrote: | CoreXY printers absolutely do have more stable kinematics | for better acceleration, but modern open printer firmware-- | mostly Klipper, though you can do it with Marlin in an | unsatisfying way--implements resonance compensation, aka | input shaping, in a way that really improves acceleration | (which matters way more than top speed for most prints). | | My Sovol SV06 can make a 3DBenchy in 37 minutes after doing | my input shaping samples. That's not as fast as an X1 | Carbon, but it cost a quarter as much, and I tend to think | that when it comes to 3D printers that bandwidth is more | valuable than latency. | bboygravity wrote: | I'll take the slower printer speed if it means I get better | reliability, repeatability and repearability. Any day. | | I've wasted enough hours on fancy | features/materials/settings that don't work. Couldn't care | less about the feature of being able to print a part a few | minutes/hours faster tbh. | postalrat wrote: | Years ago people were talking how delta printers were so | much better, faster, cheaper, etc than bedslingers. Years | later people forgot about delta printers and now its | core-xy. Meanwhile bedslingers continue to just work. | | I could care less if you printer goes 50% faster if it | fails even 5% more. | imtringued wrote: | The printer is on par with dirt cheap Chinese competitors | like Sovol. | Symbiote wrote: | Personally, I think buying any Chinese product when an | alternative exists has become unconscionable. | | China's current support of Russia is an obvious issue, as well | as their threats towards Taiwan and their destruction of | democracy in Hong Kong. | | Problems with IP infringement abound, and in this case it's | particularly disappointing as Prusa is committed to open | source. | | I hope Prusa continue to innovate, but I also hope people | reject Bambu Lab. Doing so is one of the few direct actions we | can take against the Chinese principles that directly oppose | Western values. | [deleted] | outworlder wrote: | Disclaimer: I own an Ender 3, heavily modified. | | Prusa printers are generally rock solid and their quality | control is great. | | For 1k, I really think we should be looking at a CoreXY machine | (or, at least, something that doesn't have a bed that moves, | whatever the kinematics). That's a major speed limitation, and | it also causes vibrations even in lower speeds as you are | moving the bed and your entire model. That's the only thing I | cannot easily change in my printer, anything else, from the bed | to extruders is easy to modify. | | Sure the MK4 has a larger build volume. But so do many other | printers. | | The breakout extruder board is a nice thing but it is available | for other printers too. | | I like the loadcell concept for bed leveling but I wonder how | much better it is versus a simple bltouch. | | I really wonder who is the target demographic for this printer | and why they wouldn't get other Prusa offerings instead. | | > I love their commitment to open hardware | | Prusa is relatively open with their hardware so it's indeed a | massive bonus versus some proprietary Bambu Labs printer. | However, they are the same company pushing for pre-sliced files | which is a terrible idea. Not only they can be malicious, but | they will also be specific to a given printer, which would | benefit Prusa if most gcode is created for Prusa printers. | faeranne wrote: | > However, they are the same company pushing for pre-sliced | files which is a terrible idea. | | Agreed, though should be noted this happens across the | industry. Whoever is the current fore-runner tends to push | for it. MakerBot did the same thing back when they led the | pack. Thing is, the only end Prusa can get from this is | encouraging use of their printers. A shady method for sure, | but MakerBot wanted to push for an entirely proprietary | chain, from the model file to the printer, and because they | had just gone proprietary, they could make that happen. Prusa | has no legal or technical weight to make that happen (and | hopefully they have no intention of going that direction). So | long as they keep pushing open hardware and firmware, their | push for presliced is (to me) not a deal breaker. It's wrong, | and they should be called out for it, but it's not gonna lead | to malicious legal action. | [deleted] | tcoop25 wrote: | I just canceled my X1-Carbon order. Just spend some time on the | Bambu Labs subreddit and you will see a lot of frustrated | owners. It is insanely loud, and it seems unreliable and buggy. | | I have owned a lot of printers over the years, and the only | printers I, or any of my colleagues come back to are Prusa | printers. They are incredibly reliable. The few times we have | had issues with a part, we have been able to print a | replacement. I am constantly excited by fancy new printers that | all promise to be the next big thing, and stupidly keep buying | them. | | I will take Prusa's amazing customer support, a product I know | I will be able to upgrade when they release the next iteration, | and the company that has the best free software as well (the | Bambu is just a forked version of Prusa's slicer). | dekhn wrote: | I have two MK3S and I have to say I love them. They're | simple, they work well, and I can repair basically any part | on it using their documentation. The new model adds mostly | refinements for people who want to do production printing. | openmapsguy wrote: | You'll find people frustrated with Prusa too. There was a | whole discord dedicated to trying to fix all issues. | | People act like having the power supply die, bed probe not | being reliable, not having x axis tensioner are all normal. | Just print out a bunch of parts from some randoms to fix. | | Also Prusas software are forks too so weird thing to call out | bambu for. | postalrat wrote: | What power supply would you suggest Prusa use instead of | what they are using? Is Bambu using something better? | | Bambu slicer is a fork of Prusa's slicer. Prusa's slicer is | a fork of Slic3r. Although perfectly fine it is notable | that both Prusa and Bambu make 3d printers while the Slic3r | project was just making a slicer. | blisterpeanuts wrote: | Maybe I'm lucky, as are the hundreds other Prusa MK3S | owners I see on the various forums, but the problems you | mention seem to be rare. | slg wrote: | > Just spend some time on the Bambu Labs subreddit and you | will see a lot of frustrated owners. | | In my experience this is true of basically all very niche | brand subreddits. People go to those subreddits to complain | and/or get help. It isn't a representative sample. The people | who are completely happy with their Bambu Labs machines have | little incentive to spend time on a 14k user subreddit when | they can go instead participant in a 1.7m user subreddit like | /r/3DPrinting. | Filligree wrote: | I have a Mk3S and a Bambu X1C. The Bambu is much, much | better. | | The Mk4 covers most of the distance, but at a price point | matching the X1C, and it's only _most_. Speeding it up is | nice, but... pressure advance depends on detailed | characteristics of the filament, such as viscosity, which | varies from brand to brand and _color to color_. | | The X1 has a lidar, which from experience actually does work | as advertised. The Mk4 has... what? Prusament, maybe? I would | not be surprised to find you can only get the advertised | speed if you use Prusa's precalibrated filament. | | Or you can print the calibration lines and do it manually. | That does work; it's a ten second eyeballing procedure, | simple enough for the X1 to do full auto. But you're really | supposed to do that for _every startup_ -- characteristics | change as the reel ages, which doesn 't even happen evenly | across the entire reel -- and nobody does that. | sottol wrote: | As far as I've seend the X1s lidar is mostly useless, it's | doing fine-calibration at most based on the current | filament profile and seems to be inconsistent. | | That's not to say that the X1 itself is - just that lidar | is imho a gimick. | Filligree wrote: | I've done a great deal of printing, both with the lidar | enabled and disabled. | | For PLA it doesn't make a big difference. But when you're | printing polycarbonate or PETG, the quality difference is | dramatic. Perhaps you have a defective unit? | aspett wrote: | Here's the thing, though: It's almost definitely a case of | silent majority. The printer is pretty phenomenal and I've | had excellent support from Bambu so far in New Zealand, no | less. | jsjohnst wrote: | > Just spend some time on the Bambu Labs subreddit and you | will see a lot of frustrated owners. | | I have had mine (w/ four total AMS units) for two months now | and have over 500hrs of printing so far w/ minimal failed | prints. I often print in sport and/or ludicrous too. I own | eight other 3D printers of various major brands (including | Prusa) and it's by far and away the best I've ever owned. | Easily comparable to printers 2-3x more expensive imho. | | > It is insanely loud, and it seems unreliable and buggy. | | Even with the door open to the room mine is in, I never hear | it. Sure, if you're within 5ft of it, it is a bit loud, but | not terribly so, especially if you reduce fan speeds (they | have conservative defaults). If you are someone who wants to | sleep next to your printer farm, maybe not a good fit, but | for any normal person the noise isn't a concern imho. | | > I just canceled my X1-Carbon order. | | Your loss! I'm doing the reverse, thinking about buying | _another_ one. | asveikau wrote: | > Your loss! | | This reminds me of an attitude I see in some of these hobby | communities. The idea that someone who is happy with a | different product is somehow wrong or losing. People are | highly invested and identified with their choices. Why not | just be ok with choices other people make, even if we | disagree with them? | golem14 wrote: | Always been that way. Ask any Atari ST user about Amiga | and vice versa. | dia80 wrote: | What's that little box for? A foot warmer? | outworlder wrote: | How easy is it to repair? | ferminaut wrote: | I own two MK3s+'s. They are solid machines if you are looking | to print PLA and some PETG. The stock extruder is a PITA. The | MK4's redesigned nozzle/heat break & 10:1 extruder are | basically a Bondtech LGX + Revo & should make for a great | improvement. | | The MMU3 seems like a marginal improvement, you still have | purge towers & large buffer boxes. Hopefully the reliability | out of the box has improved. | | I wonder if it's too little too late for Prusa. A Voron, | Ratrig, Bambu Lab printer seems like it has all these features | & is CoreXY. The multi material options seem better on these | options too (Enraged Rabbit Carrot Feeder, Bambu AMS). | | In the case of the Voron or Ratrig, you'll load Klipper instead | of the tried & tested (and outdated) Marlin. | | In 2023, I am not sure I'd buy a MK4 at $1100 when you can get | a Bambu for $100 more. | riceart wrote: | Agree it's tough. The non enthusiasts that don't give a shit | and aren't interested in a cash outlay are in the sub $500 | market. Once you break that point you're unlikely to want to | save a couple hundred bucks. I would have definitely had | started with the Bambu if it were available a couple years | ago. If I get tired of my MK3S I would be highly unlikely to | upgrade to a Prusa. | anamexis wrote: | It seems like an odd place in Prusa's own product line-up. | | I have a Prusa MINI+, which for $450 gets you a great | printer. The print volume on the MK3 and now MK4 is just not | that much better - 180x180x180 for the MINI, 250x210x220 for | the MK4. | | If I wanted to upgrade and wanted to stick with Prusa, | MK3/MK4 wouldn't come into the picture, I'd go straight to | the Prusa XL. | [deleted] | dividedbyzero wrote: | I have a Mini too, and I could see myself get a MK4 as the | Mini has been a bit of a disappointment. The X and Y axes | on mine aren't 90deg and there seems to be no hardware | adjustment (just a rigid printed part), no support for | software adjustments either (the respective GCode is | disabled in firmware), so I can't print proper rectangles, | just parallelograms, and any boxes and lids I print never | fit properly. I want to keep tinkering to a minimum (that's | why I got a Prusa), and I can make do with goskew and | preprocessing the gcode, but I found I have to repeat | callibration quite often and it's a fairly annoying process | and not very exact and means I can't reuse gcode files at a | later date, so having a printer that doesn't have this | defect would be very welcome. | | My Mini also likes to ram the nozzle into the build plate | once in a while without any of it's safeties triggering, | heating element stuck on and the Z stepper fully engaged, | so I can't let it run unsupervised either, and the filament | sensor is pretty hit and miss as well. I may have had bad | luck with my unit (I ordered right at release), but I'm | definitely looking for something more reliable and, | frankly, less dangerous. | | The Prusa Mk4 does look like a solid hands-off machine and | hopefully they didn't cut corners there like with the Mini, | and hopefully customer support is also better for the more | expensive ones. I don't have any use for the XL's feature | set (I only print relatively small parts and not that | many), but I didn't want to get a Mk3s as it's been pretty | dated for a long time now. I'll wait a bit until other | people have had a chance to run into any major flaws | though. | sircastor wrote: | I think as 3D printer enthusiasts, we focus on structure and | features. The thing that I think of when I think of Prusa is | reliability. For most people the most important thing about a | 3D printer is that it prints. It doesn't matter if it's | corexy or uses a Bowden tube, or the board is 32bit. And | while those technologies ostensibly provide a better | experience, it doesn't really matter (for most) so long as | you get thing thing you wanted to print. | | For me, Bambu is too proprietary, Voron is too self-built, | Ender is too unpredictable. | | By current printer is self built and it works sometimes. My | next printer is a Prusa. | eYrKEC2 wrote: | I'm not sure about too little, too late. All the different | brands are the flavor of the month ARM SBCs vs raspberry pi | -- Prusa may lag in features, but at least I've heard of | them, they have a community, and they're not going to | disappear tomorrow like something off ali baba. | eropple wrote: | Voron and Ratrig are not going to "disappear tomorrow". | | Bambu--I'm less sanguine about them, to be fair. | | The Prusa XL looks tremendous and I'm very interested, but | a $1100 bedslinger had better literally make you breakfast | to warrant it over a $250 SV06 or Neptune 3 Pro, and the | MK4 does not. | faeranne wrote: | I'd argue that Prusa still has value over both Voron and | Bambu Lab, though that value is dependent on the user. Voron | still requires significant self-assembly, as you can't buy it | as a prebuilt (far as I know), and doesn't have a company | directly sponsoring it (that may be a plus for some). Bambu, | on the other hand, is well built, but highly proprietary, and | can absolutely rug pull without warning. This puts Prusa at a | perfect position for makers/tinkers/hackers. The ability to | continue to self improve if one wants, without needing to if | one is too busy. I'm personally not a fan of Prusa Connect, | as I like having all my systems run under software I've | vetted, and right now that's still OctoPrint. But the thing | is, I can still absolutely get OctoPrint running on the Prusa | Connect hardware. It requires some tinkering, but that's in | my control. Voron requires I build everything from scratch, | and Bambu requires I use only their firmware/connection app. | I've got so many things already linked with OctoPrint that | moving systems simply wouldn't function. I'd have to | completely reset all my automation. | | As for Ratrig, that might be a healthy competition, though | I've never looked into the quality of parts there. I know | I've sat an Ender next to my Prusa and found the price vs | quality to match surprisingly well, so Prusa's not the only | game, but for something I can control, while still having a | company to lean on when I want to, Prusa's got a good thing | going. | alpaca128 wrote: | Voron? Apparently that takes about 30 hours of build time, | that's definitely not my kind of project. I want to use the | printer. Bambulabs? Looks very interesting, but it's as | proprietary as it gets. With Prusa it's clear what I'm | getting into. | | I want to upgrade from my Prusa Mini and can't justify the | cost for the XL, so the Mk4 seems like a decent choice. I'm | sure people building and modding their own printers and | flashing firmwares might have other favorites, but that's | simply not what I buy 3d printers for. | sydd wrote: | Is it really? I've looked at the Bambu Lab printer and while on | paper it looks nice I would be very hesitant to buy it, their | "advanced" features not that convincing: | | - IMO multi material printing has always been a buggy gimmick | (mostly multi material setups are very prone to failure). | | - Them advertising that the printer can print "advanced" | materials like PC is a gimmick too, the main issue with FDM | printers is layer adhesion and no matter what material you are | using its going to suck compared to injection molding. | | - bashing bed slingers is wrong too, they have their advantages | compared to CoreXY setups (mostly simpler mechanics) | | IMO FDM printers have 2 main issues: | | 1. Unreliable due to lots of moving parts. A solid design with | quality components mostly mitigates this. | | 2. Layer adhesion sucks limiting possible applications. Some | very innovative non-planar printing could be a solution but it | does not exist yet. Or could be solved by printing metal, but | these devices are far from home use. | | Resin printers solve both issues, but bring their own (mostly | that resins are very toxic stuff that you dont want in your | home.) | | So no, this printer is in no way revolutionary (neither is the | Prusa). Until both of these issues are solved home 3D printers | will be mostly used to print benchies and accessories for | tabletop games. | [deleted] | eropple wrote: | _> - IMO multi material printing has always been a buggy | gimmick (mostly multi material setups are very prone to | failure)._ | | Agreed, with the asterisk that this applies more to multi- | feeders (Prusa's MMU, Bambu's AMS) rather than IDEX. Which is | where Prusa's going with the XL, and I'm excited about it. | | _> - Them advertising that the printer can print "advanced" | materials like PC is a gimmick too, the main issue with FDM | printers is layer adhesion and no matter what material you | are using its going to suck compared to injection molding._ | | Flag on the play: sweeping generalization, ten yard penalty, | repeat second down. | | PC printing is _really_ handy for intrinsically bespoke | things like tools in the wood shop. I don 't need an | injection-molded run of them--but nobody's selling things I | can buy that address problems in the way I want to. | | _> - bashing bed slingers is wrong too, they have their | advantages compared to CoreXY setups (mostly simpler | mechanics)_ | | This is an effectively solved problem with modern motion | system controls. CoreXY on Marlin might be a mess, but CoreXY | on Klipper is clean. Aside from cost of development and | manufacture, I don't understand developing new bedslingers | except for cost...and the MK4 costs $1100. | 2muchcoffeeman wrote: | > _bashing bed slingers is wrong too, they have their | advantages compared to CoreXY setups (mostly simpler | mechanics)_ | | Tangent: why was moving the bed the solution over having X | and Y on independent axes? I've always wondered. Cost and | initial reliability? | eropple wrote: | Cost is part of it. If you look at bed-dropper printers | (the Ender 5 or the Sovol SV05), there's just _more metal_ | involved. Metal is expensive. It 's also heavy, so your | shipping costs go up. | | It's also a simpler set of kinematics for the system to | deal with. Most 3D printers have pretty dumb | microprocessors (value engineering!) at their core. CoreXY | printers use two steppers to execute any movement, and that | requires more calculations. Delta printers use _three_ | steppers to execute any movement, even. | | More modern printers run Klipper, which offloads the | kinematic calculations to a single-board computer, and that | addresses a lot of the problems you run into. Klipper also | helps with bedslinger kinematics too, though, as it has the | headroom to do some forward-looking optimization. The | current state of printers is pretty cool. | treesciencebot wrote: | Indeed. I always thought they deferred the launch of any new | model after X1C in order to take the true "just works" crown | back (with the hopes of it would be something like Intel/AMD | feuds where the monopoly had finally came to an end and | customers can finally see some real competition). But | apparently it is just a classic Prusa printer with better parts | but still a very very high price to usability ratio (compared | to Bambu Lab P1P or X1). | f38zf5vdt wrote: | It's a proprietary versus open source argument. You can build | a mk4 clone for much less than the price of a Prusa-branded | one, as everything is open source. The higher price tag is | like a donation to open source. | | Prusa also makes the open source XL if you want an CoreXY | model, or you could go with a Voron which is also open | source. | 2muchcoffeeman wrote: | I don't know why this is being down voted. Prusa are trying | to make an open source hardware company work and I guess | this is what it looks like. | | There is so much noise on HN about repairability. Well here | is some open hardware And it's "the Chinese printers have | so much more features!" | svachalek wrote: | My experience with repairability on Prusa is pretty | awful, lots of $1 parts that need to be airmailed from | Czechia for $50. At least the Chinese stuff is easily | available. | manual89 wrote: | If you're in the US, printed solid is basically prusa's | US arm now and carry a majority of their parts. | eropple wrote: | Prusa absolutely builds good stuff, but their level of | repairability just isn't different from most other | printers--Bambu notably excepted, as they're a pretty | closed system. They're all extremely commodity parts, | from boards to v-wheels. | | I wish them well, but the value of their devices to date | just does not equal the price. (The Prusa XL may change | this and I'm really excited to play with one. | kramerger wrote: | Thats an odd analogy. | | Prusa loves open source and maker mentality. Just look at | PrusaSlicer and Printables. | treesciencebot wrote: | > It's a proprietary versus open source argument. You can | build a mk4 clone for much less than the price of a Prusa- | branded one, as everything is open source. The higher price | tag is like a donation to open source. | | I would say the higher price tag is more like "Prusa" using | its name as a quality assurance system where if you want to | get something working without much hassle (since nearly | every other mk4/mk3s clone that has been out there really | really sucks except the ones from Prusa) you have to pay | the premium. | | This is not to say they are necesarrily doing a bad job on | open sourcing or abusing, but just a mark that "open source | hardware" doesn't necessarily benefit the customer as much | as "real world features". | freetime2 wrote: | > since nearly every other mk4/mk3s clone that has been | out there really really sucks except the ones from Prusa | | I have had an Ender-3 V2 for a few years and it | definitely doesn't suck. I did add a BL Touch sensor for | auto-leveling, and OctoPrint for remote | printing/monitoring - which are great convenience | upgrades. But the printer itself is very reliable and the | only maintenance I've needed to do is to replace a few | clogged nozzles. | | For anyone just getting into 3D printing I would | definitely recommend an inexpensive i3-style printer vs | spending two to three times as much on a Prusa. | eropple wrote: | _> since nearly every other mk4 /mk3s clone that has been | out there really really sucks except the ones from Prusa_ | | The Sovol SV06 has been selling like gangbusters for the | last six months or so, and it's excellent. And it's | sub-$250. | | If you move a little further away from the i3 clones (and | the SV06 absolutely _is_ clone-y), that 's where Elegoo-- | or Anycubic if you buy judiciously, or even Creality if | you get it on sale--still make the argument quite | difficult. | rhinoceraptor wrote: | This seems like a bit of a stop-gap since the Prusa XL seems | to be taking longer to get going than expected, I would hope | their plan is to totally rearchitect around the Prusa XL | design and scale that down to the 250mm^3 size class. | | They are still very good machines, but I would have a hard | time recommending anyone get an i3 style printer when the | advantages of CoreXY are so obvious, and particularly because | the price gap between the X1C is not very big. | causality0 wrote: | _The MK4 will consistently deliver a perfect smooth first layer_ | | I've lost count of the number of times I've been promised this. | post_break wrote: | My cheap ender 3 v2 with a glass bed makes perfectly smooth | first layers. | sacnoradhq wrote: | Original Prusa MK4 kit Out-of-stock :( | | I have a MK3S+ with MMU2S, bear clone upgrade, a head upgrade, | Octoprint with 2 cameras, a temperature regulation chamber, and | filament dryers. | Symbiote wrote: | The kit is not yet in stock, the longer blog post said it would | be available in about two weeks. | franky47 wrote: | I've owned an MK3 since 2018, since then some defects have | started to appear (the LCD has a contrast blob at the center, and | I cracked the X-axis stepper bracket), but nothing that prevents | the printer doing its occasional job. | | I print mostly functional parts (home repairs & improvement, | prototypes), and while I could have printed a fix for the broken | part, the prospect of taking the whole thing apart (as well as | for an upgrade to an S+) doesn't appeal to me. | Symbiote wrote: | It would be wise to print a new part while you can, just in | case the cracked part fails completely at some point. | syntaxing wrote: | I've been always a huge fan of Prusa and always wanted one (just | haven't for various reasons, not so much financial related). But | this feels too little too late. Bambulabs is absolutely eating | the market and I would be sweating if I were Prusa Research. It | sucks since Bambulabs is using their slicer and a lot of Prusa's | technology as a foundation. But most of the people I know have | decided to skip waiting for the XL or MK4 and jumped for the X1C | instead. No joke, the past purchases in the past 4 months or so | from my circle of friends and peers have all been the P1P or X1C. | | Edit: Also, its 799 for the kit you can't buy now compared to 699 | for the P1P that you can buy today and literally prints out of | the box. | operatingthetan wrote: | >It sucks since Bambulabs is using their slicer and a lot of | Prusa's technology as a foundation. | | Prusa's slicer is just a fork of Slic3r so I'd say that's fair | play. Prusa just aggressively brands opensource stuff. | reaperman wrote: | > Prusa just aggressively brands opensource stuff. | | I mean, they fork it, develop it further, and give it back to | the community. That's entirely within the spirit of open | source! | | "Aggressively branding open-source stuff" would be like | Chinese Alibaba sellers ripping off open hardware or Amazon | redistributing PostgreSQL as an AWS SaaS offering. | operatingthetan wrote: | I figured someone would take issue with that, I guess my | problem is they don't do a great job of attribution. | kryptn wrote: | It's the first point under Features. | | > Free and open-source | | > PrusaSlicer is based on Slic3r by Alessandro | Ranellucci. Thanks to the strong community and a team of | developers in Prusa Research we can continually add new | features. Follow the development on our GitHub. | operatingthetan wrote: | Thanks, I was spelling it wrong in my search. | Symbiote wrote: | It's literally on the loading screen. | | https://user- | images.githubusercontent.com/56096557/107885845... | nathan_f77 wrote: | I've been thinking about getting a Prusa 3D printer for a long | time, but now I'm leaning towards a Bambu Lab X1-Carbon Combo 3D | printer. It looks really cool and seems like a more professional | tool. Has anyone tried both? What would you recommend? | | EDIT: I read some of the other comments in this thread and did | some more research. Found some Reddit posts as well. I think I'll | definitely go with the Bambu Lab printer. | iLoveOncall wrote: | I don't own either (I have an Anycubic Vyper) but the two are | not at all in the same category. The Bambu totally outclasses | the Prusa printers, but the price is also a lot higher. | carterschonwald wrote: | Core xy motion system is hands down a faster setup. Also has a | smaller footprint for the same printable area. And enclosed | means you can do asa and Abs and nylons as a normal think. | | No matter what, make sure it's in a room with an air filter and | active ventilation. Safety matters. | | There's a lot of really cool open source printer designs too, | and having an abs/asa capable machine really makes a lot more | cool prjects possible. | | I got the x1cc and I've been really happy so far. My biggest | problem was accidentally printing pla as asa and I still | managed to make ok but weird prints | gjsman-1000 wrote: | Nice - but it's been over _a year and a half_ since preorders for | the Prusa XL began and it _still has not shipped!!!_ | | It is clear now that people who preordered the Prusa XL had | availability sacrificed for the MK4. It just sucks if you've been | waiting more than 18 months for that, only for the MK4 to get | day-one availability before your long-awaited preorder. | microtherion wrote: | I don't think that's quite correct, according to Prusa, the XL | has started shipping to customers two weeks ago, though | presumably still in low numbers: https://blog.prusa3d.com/the- | state-of-open-source-in-3d-prin... | | I'm not super happy about the wait myself, but the XL is a | considerably more complex beast, and I'd rather see them | getting it right than sacrificing quality to meeting some self | imposed deadline. | throwawayprusa wrote: | They are drowning in cash but only hiring cheap, mediocre | engineers. When they manage to hire enthusiasts, they either | burn them out or leave them to their own devices without | unifying vision or structure - as long as the owners like them. | The culture is pure nepotism. | | Also, people who manufacture the printers are paid peanuts and | are managed super strictly. | | Also, XL was announced because they were "feeling like they | were not releasing for too long". Not because they felt | inspired. Then they literally slept on it for a year. | | Don't expect anything special from them. | | Source: know people inside and from the relevant social circle. | lardo wrote: | Do you have any insight into why Josef Prusa's name and face | is plastered over every square inch of everything they | produce? | rcarmo wrote: | I have a Prusa MK2 clone that I recently revived with Klipper | firmware, a cheapo Kingroon MK3S Pro that I bought to tweak a | bit, and have been looking at getting a Bambu Labs or building a | Voron - and either of those seems like a better investment than | the MK4 if you can build and tweak the printer yourself. | | But the key thing is that the Bambu (and other upcoming Core XY | printers) are aimed at the non-modding market and seem to be a | much better deal overall, so I'm not sure what Prusa is going for | here other than leveraging brand traction... | polishdude20 wrote: | How is the Bambu a better deal? All I'm seeing is a $1500 | printer. Is there some other model? | Chilko wrote: | Yes: https://store.bambulab.com/collections/3d-printer | bittercynic wrote: | I think they appeal to a different crowd. | | I built a Prusa kit, and enjoyed building it, and enjoy | printing with it. I consider it a bit of a hobby product, and | wouldn't recommend it to someone who isn't interested in | learning anything about 3d printing. It works great, but you | have to take an interest in it. | | For the person who just wants a consumer product, I suspect the | Bambu might be the best option. | StephenSmith wrote: | Having messed with 3D printers since before the iPhone came out, | I can confidently say My MK3 is the best printer I've owned in | terms of value. I can only imagine that they've improved upon | this story with the MK4. | phkahler wrote: | Can anyone compare FLSUN V400 to this one? I'm looking, and that | seems to be awesome. | belval wrote: | Could someone explain to me what you get from paying more for a | 3D printer like this one instead of a "basic" model? | | I have a Ender 3 V2 with self-leveling bed (without self-leveling | it's not that great) and I use it a lot, enough to justify buying | a better $1k+ printer but it's not clear what I get from spending | that much money on it. | | Is it printing speed, better materials, or something else | entirely? | eropple wrote: | In 2023: not a ton. Maybe some better repeatability. You're | likely to have fewer out-of-the-box problems; they spend a lot | on quality control. | | If you're just interested in the hobby, the Elegoo Neptune 3 | Pro is, for my money, a fantastic entrypoint that you can get | for under $250. (I own the larger version, the Plus, which has | a bigger bed and turns the fans off when not printing; it's | sub-$350.) | | There's also the Sovol SV06 (and its larger Plus variant) in | the same ballpark, though they're having some significant QC | problems these days. It's also in the $200-$250 range. I have | one of these too and it's pretty nice, but I have a first-run | one before the QC problems started to rear up. | | The Prusa stuff is absolutely better made than the Sovol stuff | --though the Elegoo stuff is remarkably high-quality, | especially for the price--but frankly it is emphatically not | _four times_ better. The delta shrinks further if (and in this | crowd, maybe _when_ ) you install the Klipper firmware to | replace the stock Marlin stuff; Prusa's custom Marlin builds | are better than the competition, but Klipper beats it all | hollow, and the performance benefits of Klipper on the SV06 and | the Neptune 3 Pro/Plus are huge when it comes to faster | acceleration and thus faster printing. | jdietrich wrote: | Reliability and speed. | | An Ender 3 will produce good prints if it's well tuned, but | there are a lot of quirks to the design (mostly as a result of | cost-cutting) that can cause problems out of the box and will | cause problems over time. Prusa printers are far from perfect, | but they're trusted by a lot of print farm operators to run | 24/7 with very little attention. | | Modern CoreXY printers like the Bambu Lab or Voron machines are | _crazy_ fast compared to an Ender 3, without any real | compromise in print quality or reliability. That isn 't | necessarily a big deal for hobbyists, but it's very useful when | you're iterating on a design. For users who care about print | speed, the issue is generally latency rather than throughput. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFdfYn0DTUk | njovin wrote: | I'm not an expert but I do own an MK3S+, from what I can tell: | | - OOTB ready-to-print is a big one. There's a bit of a learning | curve to calibrating everything on the MK3S+. It took me a few | days to get mine dialed in and I'm not one of those people | that's looking for perfect prints, I just needed it to mostly | work. - Touch-screen + wifi + remote printing saves on setup: | no SD card needed. I added an OctoPi to mine to achieve similar | but that takes some tinkering and the OctoPi performance is | spotty. - They're claiming a 70% decrease in print times | latenightcoding wrote: | Prusa printers were great many years ago. in 2023 I'd recommend | buying any cheap Chinese brand. I bought an i3 MK3S+ and it | almost made me lose my love for 3d printing, the machine is | clearly stuck in the past, you don't even have remote printing | out of the box, you face as many issues as you would with a cheap | 3d printer, but you have to pay over $1k USD and wait months to | get one. | ex3ndr wrote: | super weird since it just worked for me, unlike creatility | stuff | mcast wrote: | Isn't Prusa one of the few open-source companies/printers? I | thought they were expensive because they used high-quality | parts. | yokoprime wrote: | Is this satire? I have a Prusa mini, and for a 3D printer it's | as close to "it just works" as you can get. My friend got an | Ender3 and has spent countless hours modding it, replacing | parts etc and he still can't print PETG reliably while I print | in any of the "normal" materials without worry at all. The | stories I hear about cheap Chinese printers are like my friend | with his Ender, just dialed up to 11. | abracadaniel wrote: | I agree with this. Unless you love tinkering and modding, and | don't mind spending more in the long run, a Prusa is pretty | much the gold standard for reliability/consistency. I bought | cheap, with the understanding that I'd be spending the money | over time and maybe have a better machine in the end, but it | hasn't really worked out that way. The cheap printers get | costly pretty quickly. I've learned a lot, but it's all been | by necessity while troubleshooting various issues that I | wouldn't have had with a better printer. If you want to | print, get a good printer. If you want to tinker with stepper | motors firmware, extruders, hot ends, bed leveling sensors, | etc, then something cheap might be a better intro. Going | cheap got me started, but it was a much steeper learning | curve, included a lot of frustration along the way, and was | ultimately more costly. | [deleted] | makeset wrote: | That's the opposite of my experience with i3/Mini compared to | the Enders of the world. Cheap printers => eternal fix/mod | hell, Prusa => still "just works." | | If you don't care to become a part-time 3D printer tech, and | value your time more than a few hundred dollars vs. dozens of | hours spent trying to get it right, buy Prusa and get printing. | buffington wrote: | I have an Ender 3 that just worked. I one-clicked it on | Amazon, it arrived later that day, I unboxed it, put it | together, then started a 16 hour PETG print that was ready | the next morning. That printer has since printed something | almost every day for the past year without issue. | | I have another Ender 3 that I upgraded. It has a Bigtreetech | SKR Mini with a full color touch screen, a bed leveling | sensor, and a Micro Swiss direct drive extruder. It just | works as well, and probably doesn't benefit a ton from the | fancy extruder or touch screen since I tend to use a web UI. | | I also have a Prusa MK3S+. It performs equally well to the | Enders. | | For what I paid for the Prusa, I could have a 5+ Enders with | upgraded 32bit controllers running Klipper. Or a lot of rolls | of filament. | | Come to think of it, I haven't even used the Prusa in over a | month because one of its steppers or that stepper motor | driver is failing, skipping steps or just going rogue. I | haven't bothered looking into it yet because the Enders are | easily keeping up with whatever I need printed. | | I honestly think that when you buy a Prusa, you're buying the | brand, and supporting a company who's founder helped shaped | the industry we all benefit from. At least that's what I tell | myself to justify the huge (by comparison) price difference. | 725686 wrote: | I have one of the first Prusas... and it sucks. It sucked from | the very fist day. Faulty components. Material would not stick to | the table. Warping. Miserable experience. It has been collecting | dust ever since. | johnwalkr wrote: | At my work we have a Prusa mk3 as well as a $20k Markforged | Mark2 printer, which can add carbon fibres for stiffness and | strength. The Prusa is about as good when we don't need those | features, similar speed and the slicer is actually better. | qiller wrote: | Times have changed. Never had an issue with MK3, compared to | Ender impressions. | kryptn wrote: | > I have one of the first Prusas | | I've had two Prusa mk3s for a few years now and they've been | excellent. No problems at all, and now Prusa is my default | recommendation. I'd run batch jobs on them for days for | "customers" without concern. | TaylorAlexander wrote: | Yeah, old printers suck. I got my first printer in 2011. It | sucked. New Prusas are fantastic printers and have been for a | while. | j-pb wrote: | Really nice to see steady incremental improvements to an already | solid platform! It's small stuff like no longer having to | manually Z-Adjust, and having the print-head connected via easy | to undo/replace connectors, that seem like small things but are | huge time- and nerve-savers when it comes to actually running | these things in production. | | Crazy to see how far Prusa has come with his stuff, I still | remember sitting and laughing in a hacker-space with him a couple | years ago. He is one of the few people that actually stuck to the | open-source rep-rap philosophy even after success (fun fact: he | has a tattoo of the open hardware logos to remember his roots). | mzi wrote: | They also just published a blog post[0] discussing the hardware | equivalent of SSPL if I get it correctly. | | 0: https://blog.prusa3d.com/the-state-of-open-source- | in-3d-prin... | BoorishBears wrote: | Prusa really needs a PR department. | | Getting your lunch absolutely eaten by some kickstarter | printer in near silence, announcing the first few _minutes_ | of pre-orders for your already delayed printer will take | months, near zero build up to the launch of the MK4... | | And they won't even let the win from that just sizzle a bit, | they need to take all that heat and dump it into the murky | depths of Open Source Licensing. | gjsman-1000 wrote: | It's a really, really bad look for them recently in my | opinion. | | The Prusa XL has been over a year and a half late. We had | to preorder it, plunk down $200 as a deposit... and wait as | they redesigned it over and over and blamed part shortages. | Now, out of nowhere, "MK4 - Buy Now! No Preorder!" | BoorishBears wrote: | They added a button to convert your XL preorder to an MK4 | order _with priority_. | | So they're alienating people plonking down $1,000 for a | printer by letting people from an unrelated queue jump in | front of them... | | And then shaking the faith of people who already waited | this long for the XL. It starts to scream "we won't even | be able to make enough XLs and would much rather you just | forget about that". | | - | | Edit: Wow and actually something I didn't even realize, | when the MK4 page first went up, there was no lead | time... | | So that's going to be another awfully sticky situation if | enough XL owners actually take them up on that offer. | Suddenly new buyers who were told no lead time will end | up being bumped further and further back, since there | aren't two queues: Printers ship by order date, and XL | owners will all have order dates before new buyers. | RobotToaster wrote: | Several of those suggestions would violate the OSHW | definition, a definition that was endorsed by Prusa himself: | https://freedomdefined.org/OSHW | xnx wrote: | Would someone explain what is notable about this? I'm not | familiar enough with the 3D printer space to know what new | features and capabilities are developing. | wellthisisgreat wrote: | It's the one FDM 3D printer worth buying that is being cloned | and copied with so-so results by Chinese companies. | | Unlike Ender etc., Prusa is the true "just works" FDM printer | sokoloff wrote: | I do recommend Prusa to new 3D printing hobbyists because | there are a lot of quality of initial experience features on | them. | | That acknowledged, my (lightly modded) Ender3s, a Flashforge | Creator clone, and an SKTank kit-built printer all also "just | work" and, other than capability differences, use the same | machine settings in slicer/same gcode thanks to Klipper | macros (to the point that I'll often start a print on them in | the basement without ever going down there and checking that | the first layer looks okay). I'd say I'm well above 97% for | prints work without any fuss. | zokier wrote: | Its more just a brand thing, Prusa was one of the early big | names in (hobbyist) 3d printing scene. I don't think this | printer coming from any other brand would have reached the | front page | precompute wrote: | This is the truth. Prusa used to be in front of the line a | couple of years ago, but since then they've dropped the ball | and other manufacturers have caught up. And with much better | open-source alternatives like Voron printers, very few people | are ready to shell out money for Prusa printers. Plus, | there's a big fanboy community around this brand, a lot of | which might just be genuine shills (maybe not here on HN, but | they do exist on reddit). | synack wrote: | New electronics (AVR upgraded to STM32) | | Lighter, stronger, faster extruder | | Easier to swap/maintain hotend | | Faster and more automated bed leveling | | Better stepper motors | lvl102 wrote: | These are nice and I have MK3 as well. However, I am doing most | of my prints on HP MJF these days. It's so much better and the | cost is very reasonable. FDMs are good toys that require love. A | lot of it (which can be good and bad). | TaylorAlexander wrote: | I too would rather print on a hundred thousand dollar plus | printer than a one thousand dollar one. | | I still use Prusas for my robotics work because I can print | multiple parts in a work day and iterate quickly. Either you | are ordering parts and have to wait days for them to arrive, or | your budget is very different from mine. | | I did work at Google X and have a few MJF parts still from | their in house machine. They are nice, but they are in a | totally different league. My MJF benchy sits next to my Prusa | MK3s at home. | [deleted] | Symbiote wrote: | Are you referring to a $250,000 HP MJF printer, or is there | something else? | zokier wrote: | From outsider perspective (fdm) 3d printers plateaued relatively | quickly; while the speed improvement is undoubtedly nice for | heavy users, even at 3x speed I don't know if it is really | transformative. Meanwhile the print quality hasn't changed really | that much afaik? Of course being more reliable and less fiddly | are certainly good improvements but I don't see them being | transformative or making 3d printing conquer new areas. | ferminaut wrote: | If you are designing something, being able to rapidly iterate | is great. The difference is 4-5 prints a working day vs 1-2 | prints a day. | mitthrowaway2 wrote: | The main FDM 3D printer patents expired at around the time the | first iphone came out. I've been involved with them since those | early days. If you ask me, the pace of improvement in | usability, quality, reliability, and functionality of 3D | printers has been as good if not better than smartphones. And | it continues today. These upgrades in first-layer sensing and | nozzle exchanges are a bigger relative improvement than the | incremental increase in smartphone camera resolution. And the | ecosystem of filament suppliers, G-code slicers, and 3D models | available for download for people who don't want to do their | own CAD has also grown. | | Reliability is a huge, huge deal. Back in 2009 we were dealing | with constant nozzle jams, delamination from the print bed, | print errors, drifting, ooze, extruder slip, and all sorts of | other problems. You had to keep a constant eye on the printer, | and manually tweak the G-code generation parameters to get good | results. It's come a long way and still going. | Filligree wrote: | One of the things you can do with higher speeds is use a | smaller nozzle, which translates directly to higher visual | quality. | | There's also constant improvements to the algorithms; what can | be printed in the first place. To name one, it used to be that | anything above a 25 degree overhang would cause problems... | | These days 60 degrees isn't too bad, and there are experimental | algorithms that can handle 90. Support algorithms have also | improved dramatically lately, so we're pretty close to the | point where any and all geometries will just work. | sciencesama wrote: | why is this better than ender 3 ? | sciencesama wrote: | why cant you just use ender 3 ? | bmitc wrote: | I'll have to take a look at this. I have been wanting to get my | first printer and am willing to spend more to get one that I | don't ever have to fuss around with, as I just want to use the | printer and not work on it. I was heavily considering the MK3S+, | but I had talked myself into going with a Bambu Lab printer, | either the P1P or X1 Carbon: https://bambulab.com/en. So this new | offering from Prusa deserves a look, but I think I am still | leaning towards the Bambu Lab products. They have a lot of | features. | bufferout wrote: | X1 owner here. Previously owned the mk3s+. Bambu is your best | choice today and really a quantum leap in terms of performance. | you will still need to occasionally fuss with things, mostly in | terms of optimal slicer settings, but I still get the odd | physical failure that requires intervention e.g. filament | snapping in the guide tube, object seperating from the sheet | misprint, etc. | | The AMS has been wonderful for me: no longer manually swapping | out filaments, and cool tricks like automatically laying down a | layer of easily-removed support filament between model and | support structure. | gattilorenz wrote: | Not quite on topic, but I wanted to start 3D printing for a long | time, but it feels there's a huge gap from where I am (0 | knowledge of 3D modeling and obviously 0 experience with | printing) and where I want to get (design some custom parts that | would make my life easier, e.g. a custom support for my Magic | Trackpad that integrates with my keyboard). | | Does anyone have a good recommendation to go "from zero to hero"? | OJFord wrote: | For primarily functional parts like that I'd recommend the | Prusa Mini. That's exactly the position I was in a few years | ago, and to be honest I just jumped in, Fusion360 (for example) | is pretty accessible if you have an engineering mindset at | least. Clough42 has some great design through to printing | videos on YouTube. I think I'd seen some of those, and then had | a go at designing something I wanted, (which was easy enough | and looked good 'on paper') and then ordered my Mini. | donkeyd wrote: | > a good recommendation to go "from zero to hero" | | Below is pretty much how I did it: | | Step 1: | | Buy an Ender 3. It's cheap and there are tons of upgrades out | there. Start printing stuff from Printables/Thingiverse in | order to understand how slicing and printing works. Learn the | jargon by researching issues you run into (don't just ask on | forums, search for yourself). | | Step 2: | | Find some upgrades for the printer through Youtube, Reddit and | the likes. Buy (or print) them and upgrade your printer. Run | into issues, fix them and start understanding how the entire | thing works. | | Step 3: | | Print this [0] model and watch this [1] video on how it was | designed. It shows really well what constraints you're working | with when designing for 3D printing and how to work around | them. Then, start designing your own prints in whatever CAD | software you want to learn. I started with Fusion 360, but | anything is fine, probably. | | 0: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2064269 | | 1: https://youtu.be/mziT7KV-fRI | Casteil wrote: | To add a few things: | | - Start your journey with PLA, and small prints. PLA is the | easiest/least fussy material to print because it doesn't tend | to string, or warp/shrink/lift off the bed like PETG/ABS. | Nothing's worse than having a large print fail (usually boils | down to slicer settings, hence the need to get familiar with | your printer via smaller prints first). | | - PrusaSlicer is, IMO, one of the best slicer options out | there... works for virtually all printers and it's free/open | source: https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer/releases | | - TPU filament is AMAZING to have for functional 3d prints... | but you need a direct drive extruder to be able to print it | reliably. If you can afford it, shoot for an Ender with a | direct drive extruder e.g. the S1 or S1 Pro. | | - Other stuff: Use Mainsail on a Raspberry Pi or similar for | remote control/monitoring from any browser or phone | (alternative: Creality Sonic Pad), Klipper firmware for GOING | FAST (pressure advance setting), print mods/upgrades for your | own printer (e.g. webcam mount, tool holders, parts cooling | fan ducts, etc) | codercotton wrote: | I hope it's not against any rules... it's not as far as I know | of, so I plugged your comment into ChatGPT: | | Sure, I'd be happy to help you get started with 3D printing! | I'll break it down into a few steps, from learning the basics | of 3D modeling to printing your first custom part. | | Learn the basics of 3D modeling: | | To start, it's important to get familiar with 3D modeling | software. Two popular free options are Tinkercad and Blender. | | Tinkercad (Beginner-friendly): Tinkercad is a browser-based, | user-friendly CAD software that helps you create 3D models | easily. It's perfect for beginners. Tinkercad tutorial: | https://www.tinkercad.com/learn/designs | | Blender (Advanced): Blender is an open-source 3D modeling | software with a steeper learning curve but offers more advanced | features. Blender tutorial: | https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLa1F2ddGya_-UvuAqHAks... | | Understand 3D printing basics: Learn about 3D printing | technologies, materials, and the process. This will help you | make better decisions when designing your parts. | | 3D Printing basics: https://www.3dhubs.com/guides/3d-printing/ | | Choose a 3D printer: | | When you're ready to buy a 3D printer, consider factors like | build volume, material compatibility, and price. A few popular | entry-level 3D printers include: | | Creality Ender 3: https://www.creality.com/goods- | detail/ender-3-3d-printer Prusa i3 MK3S: | https://www.prusa3d.com/original-prusa-i3-mk3s | | Learn to prepare models for printing: | | Once you've designed your 3D model, you'll need to prepare it | for printing using slicer software. This software converts your | model into instructions for the 3D printer. Popular slicer | software includes: | | Ultimaker Cura: https://ultimaker.com/software/ultimaker-cura | PrusaSlicer: https://www.prusa3d.com/prusaslicer/ | | Print your first project: | | Start with something simple to familiarize yourself with the 3D | printing process. Then, move on to more complex projects like | your custom Magic Trackpad support. | | Join online communities: | | Participate in online forums and communities to get advice, | feedback, and inspiration. A few popular 3D printing | communities include: | | r/3Dprinting subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/3Dprinting/ | Thingiverse: https://www.thingiverse.com/ | | Follow these steps, practice regularly, and you'll be well on | your way to becoming a 3D printing hero. Good luck! | sf_rob wrote: | This is good advice. Tinkercad is hardly more difficult than | Microsoft Paint and can be easy enough to start doing some | basic DIY modeling in an afternoon. | donkeyd wrote: | I don't think it is. It starts with the design phase, which | is arguably the hardest part, especially if you have no | clue how printers work. It's much easier to just start | printing pre-made stuff and then learn how to design your | own, also taking inspiration from the stuff you've already | printed. | Chilko wrote: | Agreed. I'd also argue that Blender is a poor suggestion | compared to OnShape or Fusion360, which better suited for | this type of design. | asveikau wrote: | I'm just learning too, but wanted to throw in that for an HN | audience, OpenSCAD may be intuitive for modeling. You basically | write up models in a simple declarative programming language. I | found this easier to get started with than more GUI based | tools. | mft_ wrote: | I'm interested which GUI CAD tools you tried? I don't use it | myself but I find Fusion 360 magnitudes more intuitive and | capable than OpenSCAD, which I really tried to like! | asveikau wrote: | I was initially interested in FLOSS tooling, so one that i | tried and also wanted to like was freecad. | | Haven't tried fusion 360 yet. Would stress again that I'm a | noob. | mft_ wrote: | Makes sense - my experience is that FreeCAD is just | brutally unintuitive to learn and use. (And this despite | now being pretty competent with other parametric CAD | packages.) | | I get the FLOSS preference, but this is an area which | sadly lags far behind. If you're really keen to learn | CAD, maybe give F360 or OnShape a go? I suspect you'll | see a huge difference... | grepLeigh wrote: | I met someone building a similar trackpad! He's using a 3D | printer to create the housing. | https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/113rfhm/... | | /r/3DPrinting has a comprehensive guide to getting started with | 3D Printing: | https://www.reddit.com/r/3DPrinting/wiki/gettingstarted/ | | The designing and iterating of physical components is a learned | skill, just like designing and iterating on software becomes | easier with experiences. Best way to learn is to just get | started, and have tons of fun! | gattilorenz wrote: | Awesome! As a side note, mounting the trackpad to my keyboard | (at work I glued L brackets to a MS Natural keyboard, and | plastered the keypad over) worked wonders for my RSI. I'm | going to design a holder for my Matias Ergo Pro, eventually. | mft_ wrote: | 3D modelling is _the_ big learning curve, but obviously | independent of owning a 3D printer. Running a printer (assuming | you get a reliable model) is straightforward in comparison. | | Having tried most of the options there are, I'd recommend | downloading Fusion 360 and following a few of the many online | tutorials. While the free version is a little restricted, it's | a high-quality parametric 3D CAD package, and to my mind is | superior to everything else at a hobbyist price point. It's | also faaaaaaar more approachable (IMO) and/or fully-featured | than other free options such as OpenSCAD or FreeCAD. | | A few weeks of following tutorials and trying to make your own | simple models should see you to a level where you can judge | whether it's the right hobby for you, and therefore whether | it's worth investing in a printer. | jhartwig wrote: | Zero to hero... no not really. The printing part isn't that | hard to pick up. The designing complex models with complex | tools is a real mother. Youtube is a good place to start with | tools like Fusion 360. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-29 23:00 UTC)