[HN Gopher] There's something off about LED bulbs ___________________________________________________________________ There's something off about LED bulbs Author : brainfog Score : 507 points Date : 2023-03-30 12:42 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (nymag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (nymag.com) | elihu wrote: | It's perhaps worth mentioning that metal halide bulbs are an | alternative to LEDs that are efficient and produce high quality | light. They use an electric arc in an inert gas between tungsten | electrodes. The old high pressure sodium lights used in street | lights and gymnasiums are basically the same technology, but by | using a different gas mixture you get a more normal color | temperature. | | They aren't generally used in residential buildings. You could | install them, but it tends to be kind of expensive and | complicated because they require a ballast. Also, they tend to be | most efficient at high wattages, and most people don't want their | house lit like the surface of the sun. | broabprobe wrote: | wow great article and even in the article and comments no mention | of PAR1789! It's the IEEE standard for limiting flicker in bulbs! | The Department of Energy has a great presentation on this, | https://www.energy.gov/eere/ssl/articles/flicker-understandi... | Bluzzard wrote: | [dead] | peanut-walrus wrote: | So much of the problem with LED lights is from the integrated | power supplies. Why is it not more common by now to just wire up | indoor lights with 48v DC supplied from a PSU in your wiring | cabinet and the lights can be just plain LEDs? Lower overall | cost, more reliable, safer. | detourdog wrote: | Has anyone noticed that warmer light LEDs causing blurrier text. | I did a test and found that my cool light LEDs made small text | stable and readable while the same text under warm light was | blurry. | packetlost wrote: | It's probably just lowers the effective perceptual contrast | between a page and the printed text. It's pretty understood | that cooler light is better for visibility. | davidmurdoch wrote: | Could be lots of things. The CRI (a measure of how well it | reproduce colors across the visible spectrum) of the bulb is a | likely candidate. | toddmorey wrote: | They just put in some new townhomes near me. The architecture is | beautiful but all the exterior lighting is cold LED light and it | looks so strange and frightening at night. Just... off. Amazing | how the quality and temperature of light matters. | t0bia_s wrote: | I pay attention to colour temperature. Lights at home are usually | lighten during evening, so it should be not more then 3000K - | (for melatonin). I use mostly 2700K, tried even 2000K but that | was too reddish for my taste. | | Keep in mind that after sunset in nature there is only moon light | that has blue spectrum. Fire, as light source is about 1700K. | foobarian wrote: | I had an epiphany this year that I don't need to conform to the | lightbulb socket interface any longer, now that things like | straight-wired LED modules [1] are available. They waste a lot | less space on unnecessary hardware, and can therefore fill more | space with useful light producing material. I've been slowly | converting my big round ceiling fixtures and the light and | dimming performance is nothing short of miraculous. | | [1] | https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09H3VFG8B/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b... | Someone1234 wrote: | So now changing the "lightbulb" becomes an infinitely harder | task, and in some areas requires you to pull a permit and or | hire an electrician (e.g. do you think a retiree is going to | change this themselves?). This seems nice predicated that LEDs | last 10-years or longer, which per the article and elsewhere | isn't the case. | | This movement away from standard bulb-sockets to direct wiring | is short-term-ism at its finest. Least of all because very time | you rewire this, you're going to degrade or shorten the wires. | foobarian wrote: | The direct wiring is of course not as easy as changing a | lightbulb. However I find the trade worth the improved light | quality and we can agree to disagree about the short-termism | of it. | antiterra wrote: | There's a bit of a basilisk with the cheaper LEDs (though | sometimes also the ones permanently installed on ceiling fans, | sometimes luxury brand car accent lighting) where once your learn | you can see flickering trails following movement, you can't avoid | seeing it again. Plenty of people don't notice, don't tell them. | rootusrootus wrote: | Yeah, cheaper LEDs explain most of the complaints I'm reading | here. Spend a few extra bulbs and you get a far better | experience. I have no flickering LEDs, I won't tolerate them in | my house. | dannyz wrote: | I have found that there can be huge quality differences between | cheap and more expensive LED bulbs as well. Specifically the ones | that use a cheap rectifier. Sometimes I think that I can see them | flickering out of the corner of my eye. | noneeeed wrote: | This is a big part of it. I tend to pay a reasonable amount for | my LEDs and I've yet to be disappointed. I very rarely replace | bulbs despite having dozens of fixtures, and the quality of the | light is good because I made a point of buying the right colour | temp and getting dimmable ones where it makes sense. | | Unfortunately the market is swamped with cheap low quality ones | that produce pretty crap quality light and burn out quickly. I | learnt pretty quickly that it was a false economy to skimp on | them. | ipython wrote: | You can - I see the same thing | eig wrote: | The irony of this article is that the author is suffering from | "too much choice". LEDs have so much more capability than | fluorescent and halogen bulbs that the burden has fallen on the | consumer to sort out what dimmability, temperature, and lumens | they need. It used to be that you only had one option so you | didn't have to think about it. | | Anyone who works in stage lighting or art knows that light is | complicated. We should not fault the technology for now giving us | too many options, but instead improve the branding and | advertising. | the_af wrote: | What if you don't want to become an expert, which is something | that wouldn't scale for every piece of tech and equipment? | (Maybe you enjoy tweaking with lights, but what about chairs, | tabletop materials, woods, wall paints, and yes -- electronic | gadgets?). | | With LEDs, what's the "I don't want to deal with this, I just | want something that will work as intended and not introduce | weird artifacts"? | eig wrote: | I totally agree- that's why I think we need better branding | and marketing in stores. I personally like the Costco model | of "do the research for the consumer and give them limited | choices" but it's easy to see how this could go wrong too. | | I'm sure early incandescent lightbulb manufacturers had a lot | of shoddy products and consumers just had to figure out which | brands to trust themselves. Eventually, it'll even out for | LEDs too. | whateveracct wrote: | why are you acting like you need a college credit in an LED | survey course in order to buy incandescent-replacement LEDs? | It's like a new vocabulary of like 5 terms/concepts that can | all be summarized in a sentence or two. | | When I upgraded my house, I spent maybe 30 min reading some | articles and then 30 more going through product listings [1]. | To upgrade a core piece of infra for my whole house. | | [1] I can already hear people saying "an HOUR???" But guess | what now I know about LED bulbs forever. | the_af wrote: | > _why are you acting like you need a college credit in an | LED survey course in order to buy incandescent-replacement | LEDs? It 's like a new vocabulary of like 5 terms/concepts | that can all be summarized in a sentence or two._ | | I hope by "you" you are also including TFA and the comment | I was replying to, right? | | Your response directly contradicts TFA. I don't know who is | right, I just know I'm not entirely satisfied with the LEDs | I have. It's not my most pressing concern, but I'd rather | not have to deal with 5 concepts when picking a lightbulb. | whateveracct wrote: | The article isn't some authoritative source. It's the | Strategist, which can best be summed up as just some | people with opinions. | the_af wrote: | Doesn't this also apply to people on HN? | jeroenhd wrote: | I generally buy the lamps that say "warm white". They're | usually the 2700k variety. I've literally never had an LED | light go out and the colours look fine. Philips lamps seem | like a good bet, though I remember seeing an in depth YouTube | review that showed that IKEA actually had better colour | representation (many brands add an extra dose of red light to | boost the warm colours). | | Not skimping on lamps helps prevent most problems, usually. | IKEA sells great LED lights over here in Europe, for prices | that had me worried at first. Most other budget stores and | brands sell lamps that mostly emit warm light but will make | any food look disgusting from missing wavelengths; fine for | lighting a hallway maybe, but generally not worth it in my | opinion. It's mostly these bottom of the barrel lamps that | people buy, not knowing about the effects cheap lighting can | have, that cause visual problems. | | It makes sense: back in the day, a cheap lamp may not have | lasted as long ,but the colour profile was nearly identical. | If you were fine buying a lamp every year, you could just | grab the cheapest bulb on the shelf. With anything beyond | incandescent light, that's not true anymore. | | The difference between a EUR5 lamp and a EUR10 lamp is quite | significant and worth it considering they'll probably last | you at least five years anyway. My personal approach is to | look for "warm white" (or 2700k if they use that instead), | not pick the very cheapest lamp I can find, and if that | leaves multiple options, start comparing statistics like CRI. | s_dev wrote: | >With LEDs, what's the "I don't want to deal with this, I | just want something that will work as intended and not | introduce weird artifacts"? | | That sounds like an ideal situation the free market should be | fixing -- so why isn't it? | ghaff wrote: | I think it does? I go into a home improvement store, grab a | dimmable bulb on the warmer side, and screw it in. That's | pretty much the sum total of my dealing with LED bulbs. | nix0n wrote: | The problem is that the "dimmable" LEDs I have aren't | actually dimmable, they just get flickery. | | The article has a similar sentiment: it's hard to | translate from what the box says to how it'll actually | perform in the real world. | tomjen3 wrote: | Because EU banned the free market. The ideal would have | been a slow transition where LEDs would have had to compete | with bulbs. | | Like the others I want to buy an LED where the visible | light cannot be meassured differently from a normal one, | and with the guarantee that I can return it for a full | refund if it fails before the 20k hours are up. | fl0id wrote: | The free market will never fix that, because there is no | profit in making it easy for you, nor in offering an | unlimited return. | fsh wrote: | It is quite interesting that 2700K is often considered to be a | "normal" color temperature, even though it is much yellower | than sunlight (around 5000K, depending on atmospheric | scattering). This stems purely from a technological limitation | of incandescent bulbs. The bulb filaments simply cannot | withstand a temperature significantly above 2700K. Even though | LED bulbs have no such limitations, a color temperature of only | 2700K is often chosen. | DennisP wrote: | Sunlight is great during the day but in the evening, you want | to be closer to the color of sunsets and campfires. | bobbylarrybobby wrote: | For this reason I think it's great to connect different | temperature bulbs to each light switch in your house and | switch between them during the day. I keep all of my bulbs | on during the daytime and then switch to just the warm ones | at night. | charrondev wrote: | I have hue builds in my house and have them programmed to | warm their color temperature as the day progresses into | the evening, and dim themselves down significantly as it | gets later. | tablespoon wrote: | > For this reason I think it's great to connect different | temperature bulbs to each light switch in your house and | switch between them during the day. I keep all of my | bulbs on during the daytime and then switch to just the | warm ones at night. | | If you care that much about that, it would probably make | more sense to get something like Philips Hue bulbs that | can vary their color temperature. | riskable wrote: | For reference, a candle has a color temperature around ~1800K | (with some spots of the candle emitting ~2600K)... | | https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Candle-shows- | different-c... | | I'd imagine that the "warm" color temperature is modeled | after candle and gas lighting but after reading some articles | on the history of light bulbs it seems that all the folks | working on it were trying to make the brightest, whitest | light they possibly could. Today's "daylight" bulbs would | probably be perceived as an engineering wonder by those | folks. | njarboe wrote: | Humans have used fire probably for their entire | evolutionary history. Before language and but after stone | tools. The desire for a light spectrum at night similar to | what a fire gives off surely comes mostly from that long | genetic history. | nonethewiser wrote: | 5000k is really uncomfortable in a living area. Fine for work | but not relaxing. Just living with 5000k lights for a while | won't change that. | throw0101b wrote: | There is another benefit to <3000K indoor lighting: lighting | is usually used in the evening, close to bed time. So a | warmer light helps with people's circadian rhythm in | preparing for sleep. Remember that light at sunset also | becomes warmer. | | If all your indoor lighting was 5000K, then it would be like | you would be living your indoor life constantly at noon. | | It's why software like f.lux was created (and the | functionality has been incorporated into some OSes as well). | fsh wrote: | I believe this is more folklore than science. A significant | color shift happens only for a couple of minutes during | sunrise and sunset. The change in brightness is probably | significant, but it is hard to believe that the color has a | significant physiological effect (but the placebo could be | very strong!). In my experience, f.lux and co. make it | pretty difficult to read text due to the low contrast, and | simply changing the screen brightness is much more | effective. | throw0101b wrote: | What's true for outdoor lighting is just as true for | indoor lighting: | | > _It is crucial to control upward-directed light, but we | now know that the color of light is also very important. | Both LED, and metal halide fixtures contain large amounts | of blue light in their spectrum. Because blue light | brightens the night sky more than any other color of | light, it's important to minimize the amount emitted. | Exposure to blue light at night has also been shown to | harm human health[1] and endanger wildlife[2]. IDA | recommends[3] using lighting that has a color temperature | of no more than 3000 Kelvins._ | | * https://www.darksky.org/our-work/lighting/lighting-for- | citiz... | cipheredStones wrote: | > A significant color shift happens only for a couple of | minutes during sunrise and sunset. | | This seems like a very dubious claim - the "golden hour" | is obvious to everyone, and there's an intuitive | mechanism for sunlight being "warmer" in the morning and | evening (blue gets scattered in proportion to the amount | of air it travels through). Do you have a citation for | this? | _greim_ wrote: | > Even though LED bulbs have no such limitations, a color | temperature of only 2700K is often chosen. | | I think there's a reason for this, which is that sunlight | supplements indoor lighting during the day. People rely on | indoor lighting more at night when those warmer tones are | most desirable. | [deleted] | randyrand wrote: | For evening humans are more used to to campfire color temp | than to the sun. | | For daylight, people typically prefer daylight (5000K) bulbs. | [deleted] | m463 wrote: | I personally think high color temperature lighting is harsh, | like hospital harsh. | PaulHoule wrote: | Most people have an expectation that residential lighting is | on the "warm" (low color temperature!) side. I have a lot of | Hue and Sengled bulbs in the house which are tunable and my | son complains that they look "harsh" when they are set to a | high color temperature. Myself I do art projects that require | making fine sensory distinctions and it clear to me that I | can do that better with more blue light. | | I've seen high-quality incandescent bulbs however that do | very well on my tests despite being "warm" but I think a lot | of people like using daylight from out the north window for | evaluating prints and it was was a revolution a few decades | back when art museums realized that higher color temperature | lights brought out colors better. | nonethewiser wrote: | > Myself I do art projects that require making fine sensory | distinctions and it clear to me that I can do that better | with more blue light. | | That's what it's good for. But do you want that lighting in | your living room while you watch tv? | PaulHoule wrote: | The TV is a good example because the light from TV is | transmitted light, like a stained glass window. The TV | can create the widest range of perceptual experience if | it has R, G and B colors that are precise spectral lines. | | If I'm looking at color prints in a book or on the wall | that is reflective light and it is dependent on the | spectrum of the room. My main TV room has RGB Hue lights | that can simulate "warm" or "cold" light but also | specific colors. I think 100% green is the ideal light | for hot summer days because a full spectrum is also | coming in the windows and it gives the most light for the | minimum amount of heat. I also find other colors fun | sometimes. The guest room that also has a TV has sengled | lights that can be tuned from cool to warm. | | RGB lights that can produce saturated colors are not | going to render reflective colors so well, see | | https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/metameric-failure/ | | Personally I like high color temperature light but with | the system we have we can have it any way we like. If I | really need accurate color rendition I bring in high- | performing spot incandescent and maybe someday LEDs. My | work is all "born digital" so I spend at least 80% of my | time looking at screens and looking at prints, handling | paper and such is a small but essential fraction of that. | | What I really gotta do though is set my system up so it | can vary the room color together with what's on TV, that | ought to be cool. | Bloating wrote: | Its CRI | HPsquared wrote: | Not just incandescent filament bulbs, the original artificial | light was literally incandescent - gas lamps, oil lamps, beef | tallow, candles, tallow etc. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rushlight | hollerith wrote: | Nowadays the situation is better, but for years after | incandescents were banned in California, the only LED bulbs | available in stores had a huge spike in the blue part of the | spectrum, which I experienced as painful and now know | probably caused the death of some of the cones in my retina | through oxidative stress. | | (I am over 60 and have some health problems that chronically | elevate my levels of oxidative stress -- in all cell types, | though the light-detecting cells in the retina are more | vulnerable than other types of cells are.) | | I.e., I wanted to buy an LED that vaguely approximated a | 2700K incandescent, tried many brands, but could not find | one, so I don't know what you are on about. | | Bright blue light will make a brain more alert -- and the | effect is immediate. That is probably why you young people | like it, but I am baffled by your "a color temperature of | only 2700K is often chosen" (not that color temperature is a | useful way of summarizing the spectrum of and LED bulb). | alistairSH wrote: | _It used to be that you only had one option so you didn't have | to think about it._ | | But, that single option was at least "good enough". I never | bought a normal incandescent bulb only to have the color | rendering/brightness/etc be downright awful. | | LEDs come packaged as "daylight" or "bright white" or whatever | else. I want one that's labelled "just like your normal 60W | incandescent". | balfirevic wrote: | > But, that single option was at least "good enough" | | It wasn't if you wanted a good amount of light without having | kW heater over your head. | vel0city wrote: | I highly disagree about it being good enough. Those bulbs got | hot and were expensive to run over the life of the bulb. I | like a lot of light, so I'd often end up buying lots of 100W | lightbulbs throughout my house. My kitchen would have like | 6x100W lightbulbs on for several hours a day, so ~3.6kWh/day. | At $0.11/kWh that's $11.88/mo just lighting my kitchen. | $142.56/year to light one room one quarter of the day. And | that's before thinking about how much extra heat I'm adding | to my house when I'm spending tons of money running an AC to | pump heat out of it. Add up all the rest of the lights in my | house, its _a lot_ of money just to have the lights on over a | year. | | For comparison, a similar lumen setup with LED lights in my | kitchen runs ~$19/yr to operate. ~13W compared to ~100W. I | spent probably less than $80 total swapping out the bulbs and | have not had any early failures after a couple of years. The | quality of the lights are excellent, in fact in some ways | better as I'd prefer closer 5000K in a kitchen as opposed to | 2500K. | alistairSH wrote: | My "good enough" was with regard to light quality. | Operating costs are definitely much higher for incandescent | bulbs, no question. | majormajor wrote: | They mostly _all_ were pretty awful. | | Twenty years ago I remember a lot of PR about "full spectrum" | incandescents and flourescents - no LEDs then! - there was a | lot of talk at the time about Seasonal Affective Disorder. | | I bought a few different options to check out, and looked at | some photo prints under them. They blew the "basic" | incandescents away, the photos popped and looked much more | lively instead of yellow-tinted and dim. | 542458 wrote: | I've found the color/brightness of the GE Relax HD (Yeah, | they go one step further and label the color temperature as | "Relax HD") to be pretty good. Lifespan has been hit and miss | in semi-enclosed fixtures though. | gorkish wrote: | Power supplies in all GE bulbs are total horseshit. | | Their new bulbs with the selectable color temperature | gutted the product of its remaining redeeming features. The | cost of the extra LEDs in the bulb is coming out of the | quality of the remaining components. | MBCook wrote: | > But, that single option was at least "good enough". | | Was it? Or was it what we were all used to, good or not, so | we accepted it as good/correct. | zippergz wrote: | Effectively every incandescent bulb has good CRI and can be | dimmed, so yes. | vlunkr wrote: | And the single option was cheap. There are cheap LEDs, but | they're going to flicker, or hum audibly, and die quickly | (contrary to the advertising). It's taken many rounds of | trial and error, many wasted dollars, and I still don't love | the bulbs I've landed on that much. | throwthrowuknow wrote: | Sure but it'll cost $100. The efficiency of LEDs is a joke | when you factor in materials, manufacturing, and subjective | utility. We're paying more for worse. | alistairSH wrote: | For a "lifetime" bulb that doesn't make me crazy, I'd | gladly pay $100. Well, maybe not quite, but certainly more | than whatever I pay now for mid-grade (by HD/Lowes | standards) bulbs. | derbOac wrote: | I had a similar reaction to the article. | | I actually am opposed to bans on traditional incandescent bulbs | but vastly prefer LEDs and have no desire to go back to them. | | Using LEDs was a shock to me initially mostly because, as you | point out, with traditional household incandescents there | wasn't a whole lot of options. So suddenly when I had to pay | attention to color profiles and so forth more carefully, I | wasn't expecting it. | | But I don't see that as a bad thing, I really love all the | options, and the better precision in labeling color versus | power versus brightness. | | One problem I've noted, that others in the thread are pointing | to, is that a lot of shoddy manufacturing has taken advantage | of many of the claims of LED technology to push unacceptable | products. One of my pet peeves is how I've suddenly seen | fixtures with integrated bulbs take over lighting departments, | poorly constructed and forcing you to remove the entire fixture | rather than just the bulb, when it dies after a year, much | earlier than promised. But I guess even there it's just moved | me to more selective lighting stores where I can still buy | better fixtures separately from the bulbs. | | I do think there's something to be said about declines or fraud | in lightbulb manufacturing quality compared to what is | possible, but I see that as a scourge of our age and not | something unique to LEDs. I have as much trouble finding a | quality lightbulb as I do a quality pair of pants. | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | > I actually am opposed to bans on traditional incandescent | bulbs | | AFAIK, there are no simple bans on them [ EDIT: in the USA ]. | What exists are energy performance standards, which these | bulbs do not meet. If you want, you can say that this is nit- | picking, and that of course that's a ban. | | But when we have energy performance standards for, say, cars, | nobody says it is a ban on cars, just a effective end to the | production of inefficient ones. | ignite wrote: | Can't buy incandescents in California anymore. Try on | Amazon, it won't sell to you. | nerdponx wrote: | What happened to CFL bulbs? I was very happy with mine, but | they have rapidly disappeared from shelves. | ghayes wrote: | But if we said cars need to achieve over 1000mpg, then it | would be effectively a ban on ICE, right? | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | In practice yes. However, someone might also just say "No | more ICE" and that is semantically different. Sure, in | the real world, no practical difference. | salawat wrote: | ...Some people like me _do_ call those bans. | Spivak wrote: | Where the standards are set isn't arbitrary. | | If LEDs were exactly as efficient as incandescent bulbs | there wouldn't be a law that bans all lightbulbs. Also | there's no way a law would pass that sets the efficiency | standard of incandescent bulbs because the law would do | nothing. | | It's a ban on incandescent bulbs with the thinnest veneer | of generalization. | teawrecks wrote: | The thing is, a simple carbon tax is already designed to | handle both of these cases. Burning coal/gas would have a | cost proportional to the long term effects it has, and at | the end of the day customers just see a price of | electricity. If someone wants to pay 10x more for energy to | power their lightbulbs, let them. As long as the energy | they buy is sustainably sourced, who gives a shit how they | use it? | gmac wrote: | On the other hand, the integrated bulb/fixtures in our house | at least use separate driver units, and seem to be lasting | much better than the average mains-voltage LED bulb (the | oldest is 8 years old, used every day and still going strong, | touch wood). | vel0city wrote: | So far I've had better experiences with integrated lighting | than individual bulbs. Normally the integrated lighting means | they've got more space to try and cram things like power | supplies in there and can use a lot of the actual fixture to | cool down the electronics. Meanwhile, fixtures designed to | not care about the bulbs getting hot roast the LED bulbs and | can cause early failure. | derbOac wrote: | Maybe we've just had bad luck. Our integrated lights all | failed in less than a year, whereas our bulbs have all | lasted a few years at least so far without any failures or | apparent changes. | jdcarter wrote: | I've had very good luck with the integrated fixtures. I have | a number of them in my house and only one has failed (of | maybe a dozen). This is a lot lower than the failure rate of | LED bulbs. They are far brighter than the lights they | replaced, and I personally like their lower profile. I also | installed a number of the integrated fixtures in my father's | house, and the increased brightness helps him quite a bit | (he's 80). | iamerroragent wrote: | Yup. | | It's unfortunate many of us are not used to terms like lumens | that are objectively better than using terms like wattage. | | However I do feel over the past few years they have become much | better at displaying the important terms on the front of the | package. | nickthegreek wrote: | I think it was worse in the past. I had to chose a daylight, | warm or soft bulb. Now I buy one bulb capable of changing color | temp and brightness from my couch and it lasts way longer. This | is exactly the kinda thing sci fi had when I was a kid and now | its in every room of my house. | Semaphor wrote: | Is there something different about smart bulbs? My oldest hue is | at least 6 years old, but probably older (as I can't find the | order confirmation for the bridge, so I'm guessing I bought it | offline), no flickering, no getting darker. | | Logically, I'm thinking that the pure LED components are a much | smaller part of the price, and that maybe there is less skimping? | kristjank wrote: | A funny thing my power electronics TA pointed out at a lab class | was that, while incandescents radiate heat and waste a lot of | power to just heat the space below them, we still need to heat | our classrooms. When the university went from incandescent to | fluorescent and, later LED lighting, the only thing that changed | was the power usage shifting from lighting to heating. Granted, | heating can be more efficient when handled by the systems | designed to heat, not to illuminate, but at the scale of a | reasonably big, cold-war era building with moderately | inappropriate insulation, the gain in efficiency is minuscule. It | all made me think that we're solving a lot of problems by | shifting the issue away from us, in this case from the bulbs to | the radiators. It's comparable to EVs in my opinion: "if we take | all the pollution and put it in SE Asia, we can cargo cult | ourselves into thinking that driving that 20yo beater is worse | than generating new waste" | Bloating wrote: | LTF Sunlight 2 are the best light quality LEDs I've personally | seen. The warm dim is incredibly clear amber | https://ltftechnology.com | | Ketra used to make a good smart bulb, like Hue but much better | quality light. Bought out by Lutron, who disabled the open | Restful API | | RAB now makes a decent warm-dim, comparable to the Phillips warm- | dim. | aimor wrote: | Some people seem to have different memories than I do of what it | was like buying lightbulbs before LEDs came out. I remember | incandescents also having a variety of color quality, lifespan, | and decorative options. I remember having the choice between | bargain bin bulbs and luxurious options, making sure to outfit a | room with a single brand so everything looked the same, realizing | it's more difficult to read with this one or that, keeping | receipts in the box in case they don't live up to the "double | life" (2000 hours!) branding, the annoyance of having a regular | bulb in a 3-way lamp, or a faulty circuit causing lights to | flicker, not to mention the fire hazard of having something too | close to an exposed bulb. | | Things are not so different now. As it was then, we still have | crappy products with too little information and too much | marketing. Having CRI ratings on the box is a good change (a | spectrogram would have been nice though), I think it cuts down | the trial and error it takes to find something suitable. What I | don't like are all the built-in specialty lighting sources. More | and more we're seeing fixtures with custom LED panels instead of | sockets, which often means more expensive trial-and-error when it | turns out that expensive "dimmable" ceiling light is doing PWM at | 60 Hz, or when it dies one year out of warranty and you have to | change the entire decorative housing instead of just replacing a | bulb. The good news is that it's easier than ever to ask | strangers what worked for them, and it's still less expensive to | find and buy high quality LED bulbs than it is to use | incandescents. | fsckboy wrote: | I do have different memories than you about buying lightbulbs. | I remember thinking 60-watt bulbs are frustratingly dim, 75 | watt bulbs are a minimum, but what I really wanted every time | was a 100 watt bulb, it just improves visual acuity | tremendously. And my frustration with LED and flourescents, etc | is that I can't find the equivalent of my good old 100 watt | bulb; whatever the new rating systems are, it's all an excuse | for "it's a little dimmer" | | (don't get me wrong, I like dim lighting, I prefer it, I don't | turn lights on when I get up in the morning, I make coffee, I | take showers in the dark, people come into spaces that I'm in | and always snap the lights on and it drives me crazy. I'm | simply saying, when I want to turn a light on to see, I want it | to cast a good amount of light.) | | (oh, let me add on, I also know that 1 tiny little blue or | white LED power indicator on each of a few gadgets I buy seem | able to bathe my bedroom in light when I'm trying sleep.) | nmeofthestate wrote: | I ended up buying adaptors that turn a light socket into two | sockets. Then you can achieve something approaching 100W, or | better, with a couple of averagely dim LEDs. | samstave wrote: | >> _" I like dim lighting, I prefer it, I don't turn lights | on when I get up in the morning, I make coffee, I take | showers in the dark, people come into spaces that I'm in and | always snap the lights on and it drives me crazy."_ | | Man, My brother is a constant light-stepper (he always has on | harsh, too bright, lights even when he is not in THAT room, | or if he falls asleep. | | It drives me nuts! | | STOP TURNING ON FLOURESCENT TUBE LIGHTS AND FALLING ASLEEP!! | | I recognize the visual acuity, but I cannot stand tube-FLs at | all - and while I have every single bulb in my house an | addressable RGB LED Alexa bulb (Feit Electric) -- there are | certain lights I cant replace (a few ceiling fans with | integrated LED lights, tube lights in certain spots, etc) -- | I have learned that the position of the lights is also | important. | | For example, if the kitchen tube light is on, it lasers-into | the corner of my eye if I am sitting on the couch at night | and the kitchen tube light is on. I cant alexify that just | yet (the alexa light switches require a 3-phase (meaning the | requirement of a ground wire) to mount -- my house was built | in 1959 and the wall switches do not have the req ground | wire.... | | but yeah - its interesting how sensitive you become to the | lighting environment once you pay attention to it. | | When I was doing architecture, I was always wondering why we | paid "lighting designers" so much... but after working with | them, and working with lighting in my own home, I am amazed | at what they accomplish with lights. | brewdad wrote: | I've had good luck finding 100w equivalents at my local big | box store. Only in the bright white color format though which | looks terrible indoors. So those get used on outdoor fixtures | and in my utility room and garage. | | Fortunately, my home has plenty of overhead lighting and a | few lamps, so 60w soft white bulbs are sufficient for the | other rooms in the house. | pixiemaster wrote: | i had a similar view, until i found COB LED stripes (with | dimmers), with 20W per m (LED W, not equivalent, i have | mounted a few of those 3-10m (!), and now can have dimmed 1% | background lights and hospital style brightness as well. | hultner wrote: | Do you have a link to these? | wheels wrote: | It's really not that hard to find 15w LEDs with CRI95+. 15w | will be approximately equivalent to a 100 watt bulb. A quick | Amazon search pulls up multiple options. | | Recently I even got out the big guns and bought this thing, | mainly to replace my halogen floor lamp. It's 40w, and more | like the equivalent to a 250w incandescent, though it is | awkwardly ginormous. | | https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000240793250.html | wrycoder wrote: | And yet I have a growlight that specs its output in moles of | photons per second. | ccooffee wrote: | I had been unaware of measurement according to "moles of | photons", though I suppose it's not surprising. I've never | really understood what a mole is other than "we decided to | pick this number as a constant multiplier when doing small | calculations". | | Per wikipedia[0], there's a vaguely defined unit, the | Einstein, which may be defined as the energy in a mole of | photons. (The vague definition being because each photon may | have different amounts of energy, and thus an Einstein would | be some weird function in order to describe total energy.) | Wikipedia suggests using measures of Photosynthetically | Active Radiation (PAR)[1], like Photosynthetic photon flux | (PPF) instead. I suppose this is because PAR is literally | defined to measure according to "what plants crave", but it | also allows bounding the "total joules of energy" above and | below by the PAR wavelength limits. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_(unit) | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthetically_active_r | adi... | hinkley wrote: | I'd been dealing with flickering CFL bulbs for some time | already. My fovea is about 10hz slower than the rest of my | retina. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 58hz versus 68hz (70Hz | CRT displays were a goddamned revelation for me, when I could | finally afford them. Thank you Iiyama.) | | Things flickering in the corner of your vision is distracting | af. | | But then my partner started complaining about headaches | reading, but only in certain rooms in the house. I put two and | two together and stopped buying a brand of CFL (I might have | upgraded to LEDs at this point, I don't recall). | | More recent advice was to go to the hardware store and record a | slow motion video of the demo bulbs, to see if you can detect | flicker during playback, but I think I've only succeeded in | that one time and so I'm not sure if it doesn't work as well as | advertised or if retailers have gotten better vendors. | mcguire wrote: | Can you get 3-way LEDs? I have some 3-way lamps and I've been | casually looking for bulbs but haven't found any. | | (Yes, I know I could search online and order them. It's not | that important.) | aimor wrote: | Yes, but not at bargain bin prices. | drcongo wrote: | I don't recognise any of the issues mentioned in this article at | all and there must be a hundred odd LED bulbs in my house. I'm | wondering if this is a US-specific thing, I'm in the UK. | gniv wrote: | > I'm wondering if this is a US-specific thing, I'm in the UK. | | I think so. I am in France now and all I can easily buy are | expensive and good quality bulbs. In US the quality was all | over the place and price was not always a good proxy. | 99_00 wrote: | The fact that they had to ban incandescent should have been the | big red flag. | ipython wrote: | I am sensitive to low refresh rates - back in the crt days I | would visibly notice low refresh monitors and it would give me | headaches. Some (low cost?) led bulbs give me the same effect- I | can see the rapid flicker. Some hotel rooms are notorious for | this. | | I have led bulbs everywhere (new build, recessed lights). | Thankfully they don't have the flicker effect I've seen on other | bulbs. And I've found that I actually prefer the more "daylight" | bulbs in certain areas such as kitchens. The cans do have | adjustable color temperature (a physical switch) so it's not too | bad if I decide I'd like a warmer light down the road. | sdflhasjd wrote: | I have had the flicker effect with some of the particularly | cheap LED work lamps | alamortsubite wrote: | Those early Cadillac taillights put me on the verge of puking. | Lights on newer cars are better, but still a distraction. | yabones wrote: | A lot of cheap LED retrofits on older halogen headlights do | this. The only thing worse than being tailgated by a F-150 | with ultra-blaster highbeams is an old junker with cheap | flickering LEDs. I've even noticed a lot of DRLs flickering | lately as well. We need stricter laws on headlight brightness | and intensity in North America, and we need them yesterday. | Whitespace wrote: | I recently bought EcoSmart bulbs from Home Depot (they're a HD | brand) that have a color temperature selector on the side (2700k | to 5000k). But it also has an option called DuoBright, which will | change the temperature in response to the standard cheap Lutron | Diva dimmer I have. | | It works *perfectly*! I can max the dimmer and it's bright white | daylight, or I can dim it down to a very dim 2000k. There's no | buzzing, no weird high-temp/low-light weirdness. It works | magically. And it's the cheap option! | | I replaced all BR30 & BR40 bulbs with it. I wish it came in more | shapes! I'd replace every lightbulb in the house with them. I | paid $5-$13 per bulb. | | No one seems to know about them, not even the guy at Home Depot | who worked in the aisle. He was surprised how much I raved about | them. | pcmaffey wrote: | Some of my LEDs continue to glow faintly when off. I assume the | efficiency of the bulbs is converting a small trickle of power | into light. Has anyone experienced this? Anything to be done? | CamperBob2 wrote: | Unscrew the bulb. Is it still glowing? If so, it's the | persistence of the phosphor. That's been my experience. | tilsammans wrote: | Yes! This is fairly common. It usually happens when the power | leads pick up a small amount of electricity via induction. You | can place a compensator near the fixture to take care of it. | (Basically a high voltage capacitor) | pimlottc wrote: | Can you go into more detail about this compensator? Is this a | consumer product you can buy to fix a misbehaving light or a | component that the manufacturer needs to include in the bulb? | ilikejam wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uEmX5XClPY | projektfu wrote: | For how long? LEDs produce broad-spectrum light using | phosphorescence activated by discrete-spectrum light. Those | phosphors will glow for a few seconds after you turn them off, | or if you're really sensitive you may see a glow-in-the-dark | phenomenon. When you unplug a lamp or turn off a true switch, | there should be no residual current. | | If you are using the bulb itself to adjust the power level, | like with some smart bulbs that you are supposed to leave | switched on, it's possible that they never turn off the power | completely for some reason. LEDs are dimmed using PWM so they | may have an off setting that is like 1% of duty cycle or | something, who knows. | Crosseye_Jack wrote: | Long story short: Its the wiring. | | Could be a number of reasons but the most common is either its | wired to a dimmer or similar which is leaking some current when | its "switched off" or its switched on the netural side and the | wiring is acting as a capacitor and letting some current flow. | | EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bgUy6zA0ts | BozeWolf wrote: | Short story longer: if the led is connected to a dimmer, it | can also be that the led is not-dimmable. Or not compatible | with the dimmer. | pcmaffey wrote: | I've got dimmable LEDs on a non-dimmable switch that are | glowing. I guess the next step would be to replace the | switch with a dimmable one... | dghughes wrote: | I have an old floor lamp that I converted from halogen to LED. | It has a dimmer knob but even when off it didn't turn off the | light it was very faint. I thought it was the | potentiometer/knob leaking current. I think I also had the | issue on a room that also had a dimmer switch, an actual light | in the ceiling not a lamp. So it seems to be the dimmer feature | that is the issue for me. | scythe wrote: | I'm still waiting for the FCC or ITU to define a band for | electrodeless plasma lamps. | | For the uninitiated, these are microwave-driven light sources | that are about half as efficient as the best LEDs, but still way | more efficient than incandescent. The light output spectrum is | continuous and single-peaked, and in the case of sulfur lamps, so | close to solar that they are routinely used as a "synthetic | sunlight" for testing solar panels. | | The MW band used in existing appliances is generally the 2.45 GHz | Bluetooth and microwave oven band, because it's unregulated, but | the high output power and the need for a transparent housing | means that they can interfere with other consumer electronics. | There is virtually no risk of two bulbs interfering with each | other, so even a relatively narrow dedicated band should work | fine. As I understand it, the light output is continuous -- no | flicker -- and anyway the beam power of a circularly polarized | microwave _should_ be continuous. | | Usually, microwaves are created using magnetrons -- vacuum tubes | -- which have a high minimum power output (think floodlight). | Microwave diodes do exist, although they haven't yet been applied | to electrodeless lamps, because consumers won't be interested in | using a light bulb that kills Bluetooth. | | But it _is_ physically possible for us to enjoy an efficient | light source that looks nice. There are just a few kinks to work | out. | Reason077 wrote: | > _" 'Hungarian-made GE Basica bulbs ... with a bold stamp on the | side reading, NOT FOR SALE FOR USE IN THE UNITED STATES."_ | | This seems odd considering they surely can't be used in Hungary | either. The EU started phasing out incandescent bulbs more than a | decade ago! | | Don't miss them, personally. LED lighting is excellent _if_ you | buy good quality ones. And I certainly don 't miss having to | periodically go around the house changing blown bulbs! | skocznymroczny wrote: | The EU regulations were against sales of incandescent bulbs. | But in most countries they are still available rebranded as | "heat bulbs" or "workshop bulbs" with a large "NOT INTENDED FOR | HOUSEHOLD USAGE" 'warning' sign. | rietta wrote: | In my personal experience the LED bulbs at Home Depot are | extremely expensive compared to traditional bulbs we used to buy. | Don't list anywhere near the advertised long lives. And are | difficult to recycle and worse in landfill than the historical | bit of glass and metal bulbs. | ineedasername wrote: | While my led bulbs last much longer Incandescent, and end | probably save money and energy, they consistently fail very long | before their stated lifetime. | | I believe this is due to the poor quality of the electronics that | comprise the base of the bulb and control the LEDs. The same | issue with compact fluorescent bulbs I had opened up some of | those cf. bulbs when they burned out prematurely and found burnt | ou components. | | I haven't bothered to do this with LED bulbs because I have every | reason to assume they're the same manufactures that need the CF | bulbs and are making the LED bulbs are pulling the same trick. | | It was a race to the bottom to make the cheapest bulb stand | compete on price may have resulted in bulbs that are far more | faulty than they need to be. | wnevets wrote: | > they consistently fail very long before their stated lifetime | | Do you mean the stated lifetime of a specific LED or the | lifetime promises generally assigned to LEDs. In my experience | you get what you pay for. | noneeeed wrote: | I've noticed that my LEDs seem to have a bimodal lifespan. In | parts of the house where we have many of the same kind, we went | through a period early on where a few lasted much less time than | I expected and had to be replaced, but now I've not had to | replace any for several years. | | There seems to be an element of luck with the cheaper ones. The | ones in a batch that work well just keep going, while a small | number fail relatively quickly. Once you've gone through a few | replacements you are left with just good ones that just keep | going. | elil17 wrote: | In failure engineering this is called the "bathtub curve." | Those early failures are called "infant mortality" and are | typically due to errors in the factory. In 20-30 years you'll | get wear out failures, as the components hit the end of thier | designed lifespans. Generally in manufacturing any new | product/process has a pretty high infant mortality rate which | then gets worked out over years of improvements to design and | manufacturing process. You can either do factory testing | (probably what high quality LED brands are doing) or just ship | the product and let the customer handle it. | teajunky wrote: | Anyone watching Star Trek Picard knows that we all will sit in | the dark in the future. | cm2187 wrote: | I think most people in this audience are aware but in case some | are not, the other thing with LED is that it is not possible to | dim them. So dimming works by making them flash at a higher | frequency than what the human eye can see. Which is ok-ish for | humans, but will drive dogs crazy as they see at a much higher | frame rate. | hedora wrote: | That's not fundamental. They could flicker the individual LEDs | at different phases. A typical bulb contains many LEDs. This | would cost money, of course. | nitins_jakta wrote: | There's a forum/community of people who get migraines / severe | eyestrain from LED bulbs at LEDStrain.org. It's likely related to | any LEDs that flicker (PWM). | | Also a PhDs website: www.FlickerSense.org | boesboes wrote: | I haven't seen a 'normal' bulb in over 10 years. I only have LED | lights and they are great. They used to be a bit shit yes, but | over the past 5 years they have surpassed my expectations. I | can't even find any that don't have a nice color profile and are | spec'ed to some temperature etc. | | imo, modern led lights are much, much, much better then the | incandessent bulbs & these power-saving lamps we used to have. | Both in durabillity & color etc | phoyd wrote: | >If you're lucky, the LED will have a CRI of 90 or higher | | EU has banned incandescent lights years ago and the situation for | LED buyers is much different here. My local drug store chain | (Rossmann in Germany) sells 1000lm E27 bulbs under their own | Rubin brand with CRI>97 for 4.99EUR. No flickering and available | as 2700K or 4000K. My Opple Light Master 3 even reads CRI 100. So | for me right now, it's just going to the drug store and buying a | bulb, like before the ban. | Agentlien wrote: | I read a lot of the other comments here before yours and they | all seemed to describe a reality very different from my own | experience. Then I saw yours and it suddenly makes sense. I am | also in the Europe, most other commenters seem to be from the | US. | | Here I find it is very easy to find good LED bulbs with the | strength and color profile of my choice and I have used LED in | all rooms of my house for the last 10+ years without any | failing so far. | fy20 wrote: | I'm not sure if this is the norm in Europe, the only chain | store I know that sells high CRI (>90) bulbs is IKEA. If I go | to my local home store or supermarket, they are all junk | Chinese bulbs that I doubt are really even 80 CRI. | | CRI isn't even something you can filter by on their online | catalogues. At least the new EU energy labeling let's you see | what the specs are. | Tade0 wrote: | Cheap bulbs do a lot of "CRI hacking": | | https://www.waveformlighting.com/tech/what-is-cri-r9-and- | why... | | It's easy to make a bulb that scores higher than 80 - | still, they usually have poor R9 (red reference light | source) scores, which is noticeable. | rootusrootus wrote: | > I am also in the Europe, most other commenters seem to be | from the US. | | You're falling for the "Europe is better than the US, of | course" mindset. What you are actually seeing are partisans | spinning a narrative to fit their ideology, not an accurate | description of reality. | | We have really high CRI bulbs here, too, and they're | inexpensive. I can go down to the home store and buy them by | the dozen. I'll bet you money that bulbs in the US and bulbs | in Europe are mostly manufactured in the same place... | zippergz wrote: | Please link me to a 95+ CRI bulb available at Home Depot or | Lowe's. | KennyBlanken wrote: | https://www.google.com/search?q=site%253Ahomedepot.com+CR | I | | Cree, GE's "HD" line, Phillips' high CRI line, and I | believe "Feit", the HD brand, also has high CRI bulbs. | | You can only get Cree bulbs from HD via shipping; they | don't stock them in store, at least in my area. | | Phillips and GE HD bulbs are available in a lot of local | hardware stores and even pharmacies. | wil421 wrote: | Greater than 95 or including 95? Most of the Philips | brand dimmable LEDs have a CRI of 95. The eco smart is | crap at 80 and that's to be excepted from the cheap house | brand. | | The in ceiling lights I bought to replace a bottom dollar | Amazon light was are 94 and I'm pretty sure I bought the | cheapest I could that would change temp to match my | existing ones. | | Your friend has shared a link to a Home Depot product | they think you would be interested in seeing. | | https://www.homedepot.com/p/Philips-Soft- | White-A19-LED-60W-E... | | Looks like GE's Sunshine brand has a CRI of 97 and is | $8.99 on Amazon. | | GE Sun Filled LED Light Bulb, 60 Watt Eqv, Soft White, | A21 Standard Bulb, Medium Base https://a.co/d/fLkL8wr | zippergz wrote: | Legit helpful reply. Thank you. | mixmastamyk wrote: | Wifi bulb with an App? Now I have to worry about light | bulb security and it selling me out? | myko wrote: | fwiw i am also in the US and never had an issue finding the | right LED, which are far superior to the older bulbs in every | way from my perspective | KennyBlanken wrote: | I'm in the US and every single LED bulb I've ever bought - | some ten years old - still work fine. | | I also don't buy the shitty cheap bulbs. I buy mostly Cree's | high CRI dimmable bulbs, Phillips high CRI dimmable, or GE | high-CRI bulbs if I can't find the Crees (Home Depot stopped | carrying them in-store.) | | The problem is that both the author and a ton of people in | this discussion buy shitty, cheap, no-name bulbs and then | they're shocked when they flicker, don't dim well, and fail | often. | | This whole discussion is a bunch of angry old men yelling at | clouds because the guvmint won't allow them to waste 4x as | much electricity to light their home. | | Even high-CRI bulbs aren't a "perfect" replacement for an | incandescent, but the energy savings, especially if you're in | an area where you use air conditioning and thus the heat of | an incandescent bulb equals more energy usage for cooling, is | worth the small sacrifice. | kldavis4 wrote: | actual Amazon customer reviews of Cree's | TBR30-14050FLFH25-12DE26-1-E1-MP (25,000 hour rated life, | 90+ CRI): | | - Fails after 12 months - Nice and bright while they last - | 6 months in, 2 already burned out. - I've already had two | die in less than 6 months | rvba wrote: | As much as I like EU, the new bulbs are flickery shit. | | I bought a stockpile of 150W incandescent bulbs marked as | 'shock resistant' (they are definitely not) and they give | decent light. The 100W LEDs give more like 50W and flicker | too.. | dboreham wrote: | Hmm. I'm pretty picky about CRI but for me the last few years' | LED lights are really great. Much better than any fluorescent | source. Much brighter than any incandescent. Very reliable. | Dimmable too. | distortedsignal wrote: | > The impetus is on you to decide when things have started to | look uncanny. "I wish that would be addressed by the industry -- | like, maybe if it reached a certain light-loss factor, it would | just shut down, you know?" Nelson said. "Or if it shifted in | color past a certain point, it went into failure mode." | | This is complicated, and I don't think the consumer knows what | they're asking for. From my understanding (and watching a lot of | Big Clive lightbulb teardowns on YouTube), this would require an | active sensor in the bulb. Most of the circuits in these bulbs | are embarrassingly simple - 3-4 mostly passive components, and | 1-2 silicon based chips or raw transistors. If you add an active | sensor to that system, your cost balloons significantly. Then you | have to calibrate the sensors. Then we get into the "printer | cartridge" problem, where "my light bulb won't turn on because | it's insufficiently cyan, but I only want a red light." | | We didn't know that we wanted things when we had incandescent | bulbs. Now that we're being forced to switch away from | incandescent bulbs and use a new technology, users are able to | ask for things. I think that's partially exciting (users having | preferences is good!), but it's also potentially complicated by | companies not providing low-cost solutions that are as good as | the old thing. So, overall, good and bad. | hprotagonist wrote: | A smoke-test i had not really thought of: shoot a quick video in | slow motion on your phone and watch the result to see if there's | a light flicker . | throwthrowuknow wrote: | That works really well! Tried it on a cheap LED that I notice | the flicker on some times and it really showed up. Also tried | an expensive one that I don't notice any flicker from and there | was a very fast flicker on slow mo. Tried daylight as a control | and there's no flicker. | [deleted] | nuc1e0n wrote: | I've never even seen a LED bulb that wasn't 2700K. Also, do some | bulb packs not list the incandescent equivalent wattage in | addition to the Lumens? | roamerz wrote: | I really like LED bulbs and use them everywhere I can. | Unfortunately they suffer the same as anything that is forced by | congress rather than evolving at the natural pace and replacing | standard lighting sources when the technology is mature enough. | Take for instance cell phones. They replaced landlines and were | adopted by users because the technology was ready and they were | better than the product they replaced. Imagine if congress had | outlawed landlines. Same can be said for EV's. IC vehicles are | better in almost every aspect yet congress is doing everything it | can to force their obsolescence before their time. The problem | with that is that every time they do something like that they | chip away at their credibility and when some real emergency comes | along we the people aren't so easily fooled. | duxup wrote: | I think things like price pressure/ consumers just buying the | cheapest bulb possible happens regardless. | TheAtomic wrote: | First world problems | tbihl wrote: | Non-dimmable bulbs are the author's problem. | | First, bans on incandescent bulbs are foolish because they | encourage defeatist foolishness like this article (as far as I | can tell, for the sake of virtue signaling and modest | acceleration of a change that was already happening.) | | The CFLs which preceded LEDs were really awful, especially for | closets (where they'll linger for decades, given the low | utilization of those bulbs,) but LEDs are fine, amd really nice | if your 70 year old house gets retrofitted for AC and you need | the reclaimed electrical capacity. This author just needs to pony | up for dimmable LEDs, which aren't expensive except by | comparison. Non-dimmable LEDs are right up there with running | toilets and rodents in the pantheon of things to make homeowners | lose their minds. | mhb wrote: | > Non-dimmable LEDs are right up there with running toilets and | rodents in the pantheon of things to make homeowners lose their | minds. | | Really? I've never understood the affection for dimming lights. | Essentially always I want lights on or off. | giraffe_lady wrote: | For me it's like if the sound on your computer was either on | or off. I adjust the light to the specific task, time of day, | my mood & energy level, and what the natural light is doing | to the room which also varies by season, time and weather. | | I'm really miserable in a too-bright room. I have some | sensory processing issues which contributes a lot to this | admittedly, but when I talk about it with people who don't | they often understand it immediately or admit to experiencing | the same thing, though to a smaller extent. | rootusrootus wrote: | > I've never understood the affection for dimming lights. | Essentially always I want lights on or off. | | It's about choice. I have several dozen LED can lights in my | house producing 1600 lumens each. Sometimes I want every bit | of that power, but I also like being able to turn them down a | bit in the evening when I don't need it. | thfuran wrote: | And you never want even more lighting than you currently | have? Not even so much as a lamp to adjust lighting in a | room? | mhb wrote: | Occasionally. And I would use a non-dimmable lamp for that. | vel0city wrote: | One example is my living room. Sometimes I'm hosting people | over, and I just want the whole room to be really bright as | we're all gathering around, talking, maybe playing games, | etc. I want that room practically as bright as I can get it | during those times. | | But other times I'm just wanting to cozy up to the fireplace | with a book and some light music and a dram of whiskey late | in the evening. I don't need the room to be super bright, so | I might just have the lights over the fireplace on set very | dimly. | | Same goes with the kitchen. When I'm actively cooking a meal, | I want it very bright. But I don't always need it that | bright, sometimes I just want it a bit more ambient in its | lighting. | | Or the dining room. Sometimes I use that space for projects | as it has the large table, and I'll want it as bright as | possible. But other times, I could probably stand to have it | at about 75% of its brightness as we're just sitting around | together having a meal, and with my home layout its a bit of | a central space so its nice having it at like 20% brightness | to act as a bit of a night light as people go through the | house. | tbihl wrote: | Sorry, I wasn't clear at all. The non-dimmable ones seem | prone to flickering with changing voltage, and all grids have | varying voltage. And then, at least if you're like me, you | start thinking of all the broken things that might manifest | in flickering lights. | hedora wrote: | Since the electricity they use is basically free, and there | is (almost) no practical constraint on heat emissions, LEDs | are generally too bright. | | You could hire a lighting consultant, then buy expensive | bespoke bulbs so that having them at 100% is the right | choice, or you could spend an extra ~ $50 per room for a | dimmer. | orev wrote: | Many people complain about sleep problems. Light exposure is | essential to regulating sleep cycles, and going from full | brightness to full darkness at night can easily contribute to | those problems. Dimmers allow finer control of exposure. | mhb wrote: | I am skeptical that any significant portion of the | population outside HN is tailoring their room lighting, via | dimming, to their activity schedule. | | It also is a tad hyperbolic to include non-dimmable bulbs | in the pantheon of things to make homeowners lose their | minds. | orev wrote: | A very large portion of lamps purchased at home goods | stores have dimmer switches (a knob that you turn instead | of flipping a switch), and dimmers have been widely | available at home improvement stores for decades. This | idea is not some niche thing limited only to smart home | tech people. It doesn't have to be automated--one can | just get up and set the brightness to their liking. | | I think the big surprise for most people would be that | many LED bulbs are not dimmable, as that hasn't been | something they had to worry about with older bulbs (it | was also an issue with CFLs, but people avoided them | because of the harsh color) | rootusrootus wrote: | I agree that it's probably still niche, but judging by | the expanding section of smart lighting at my local Home | Depot, my guess is it has gone beyond techies at this | point. Home Depot definitely doesn't cater to tech folks. | toast0 wrote: | I have a lot of dimmers in my house because they were there. | It's nice to turn the hall lights down at night when I'm the | last one awake (but not if they get too flickery; older | dimmers built for incandescent don't always work with | dimmable leds), and very nice when watching or starting a | movie, etc. | | But, dimmable bulbs are also an indicator of quality. Someone | cared enough to make sure it worked in that situation, so | there's evidence that someone was caring during the design. | mhb wrote: | > But, dimmable bulbs are also an indicator of quality. | Someone cared enough to make sure it worked in that | situation, so there's evidence that someone was caring | during the design. | | Maybe. It could also be to avoid the situation in which the | average consumer just picks up the cheapest bulb and, when | he gets it home and it is flaky when used with the dimmer, | returns it to the store. | | Or maybe it's a low quality way of ticking a feature that a | customer has been told to look for regardless of whether it | is relevant to his situation. | jt2190 wrote: | Yes. This immediately stood out: | | > We were renovating our apartment, and one day our contractor | summoned me to the bathroom in dismay. He adjusted the dimmer | switch he'd just installed, and a new LED fixture began | strobing like we were in a seven-by-eight-foot basement dance | club. | | I'm not sure what skill-level of contractor he was using, but | it's pretty obvious that nobody checked that the light fixture | was dimmable with that particular switch. | eimrine wrote: | Non-dimmableness is only one of the problems. For me the | biggest problem is that all LEDs are blue, despite of any | light-filters. I can not use it in bedroom when I use to read | books before sleep and in bathroom when my aestetical needs of | seing bare body have been not met. I have even changed my place | of living since Sodium lamps have been replaced with LEDs on my | old street. And if I need a really bright light or really high | CRI then I'm going to use MHL. My point is that LED is not | really a good source of light except of if I need energy- | efficient source and/or with high tolerance to often on/off. | jwestbury wrote: | > For me the biggest problem is that all LEDs are blue, | despite of any light-filters. | | It's likely that you're buying bulbs with a low CRI. | Unfortunately, this is poorly-marketed (and CRI still doesn't | capture certain edge cases). | | I'm a fairly serious amateur photographer, and until I moved | overseas, I'd set up a room as an edit and print studio, with | a pro-grade photo printer. I specifically sourced high-CRI | bulbs, and found that my eye couldn't tell the difference | between my room at night (with a measured color temperature | of 4500K or so) and my room during the day with the blinds | open (with about the same color temperature), even looking at | a variety of photo prints. | Waterluvian wrote: | My home is full of bright, warm yellow/orange LEDs. | | I also have a lot of "sunlight" LEDs which I'll describe as | "white" and I LOVE them for big rooms and making daytime feel | like daytime. Great for my office. | | I recall blue being a big problem when LEDs for homes were | new, but when I bought a house 3 years ago and revisited it, | I was delighted to find so many very solid options. Dimmable, | non-flicker, warm LED bulbs. The Canadian government also | chipped in with my tax dollars so they were about 50 cents | each. | | My one complaint is that even the fancier, pricier ones seem | to burn out too. In 3 years I've had to replace 4 ceiling | bulbs of about 50 (the builder went nutty with recessed | ceiling lights). I think they're just driven really harshly | by the A/C. | eimrine wrote: | "for the invention of efficient blue light-emitting diodes | which has enabled bright and energy-saving white light | sources" | | This is what drives your "warm" lamps. No deep red at all, | man. | Waterluvian wrote: | I guess my lying eyes deceive me. | | By filtering out other wavelengths I'm left with all this | warm light rather than nothing. | rini17 wrote: | For reading in the bedroom I use RGB strip behind furniture, | preset to yellow. Diffuse light, no blue at all. Of course | poor color rendering but I don't mind for this use case. | eimrine wrote: | > no blue at all | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35373754 | rini17 wrote: | That is true only for white LEDs. The RGB strip does not | have them (there are some that include white LEDs but not | this one). If you set it to yellow, only pure red and | green elements are on, blue elements are completely off. | eimrine wrote: | There is no such thing as a pure red LED. Those are blue | ones but with light filters. If you don't see blue which | is actually present and you see deep red which is | actually absent then maybe consider yourself as | brainwashed by marketologists. | seszett wrote: | I think you misunderstand the fundamental difference | between "white" LEDs which are generally a blue LED | associated with various phosphors that convert the | monochromatic blue light into a mostly continuous | spectrum going from blue to red, and the monochromatic R, | G and B LEDs that each emit a fairly narrow band that is | either red (with no blue or green at all) green (no blue | or red) or blue (no red or green). | | Blue LEDs are used to create white because it's easier to | convert blue to lower frequencies. But red and green LEDs | absolutely exist. LEDs exist for a wide range of narrow | wavelengths, including for example infrared LEDs that | emit at 940 nm without a trace of blue (obviously, | otherwise they would be visible!). | eimrine wrote: | > infrared LEDs that emit at 940 nm | | Is there any LED capable of emitting 780nm? Or maybe a | luminophore for letting manufactures to convert invisible | 940nm into anything visible? AFAIK both answers are | negative. | seszett wrote: | https://www.lumixtar.com/5w-ir-780nm-high-power-led.html | | This seems to match what you're asking for. But | converting longer wavelengths to shorter ones is always | going to be difficult, so I don't think there exists a | practical way to make visible light from 940nm. | rini17 wrote: | No. | kodt wrote: | That and you need LED compatible dimmer switches. Old dimmers | do not play well with dimmable LEDs. | antiterra wrote: | It's not ass simple as dimmable or not dimmable. Not all | dimmable leds work with all dimmers, some do and make a | horrible hum but are still highly recommended in reviews by | people who don't have those issues. The situation is a | nightmare for someone just wanting to go to a local store and | buy a bunch of bulbs for the room where they eat. | | Further, if you dare to mix bulbs you'll often get different | color/brightness behavior at different levels of dimming. | MarkusWandel wrote: | Even the cheapest, crappiest (though you shouldn't compromise on | colour rendition) LED bulbs are better for your wallet than | incandescents. Simply because of the huge amount of power they | save. | | I'm not sure yet about the light fixtures that have non- | replaceable LEDs in them. Generally these are heatsinked well and | use higher quality power supplies though. | elil17 wrote: | Lots of people here are arguing about whether LEDs actually look | worse. Who cares? Even a modest environmental benefit is worth | it. If you want nice-looking light, just go outside - it's free. | bowsamic wrote: | > If you want nice-looking light, just go outside - it's free. | | Did you read the article? It discusses this quite extensively | Scene_Cast2 wrote: | Lots of people live in areas where for half a year, the days | are short, cloudy, and cold. | elil17 wrote: | Outdoor light is pleasant (to me at least) even when it's | overcast. And, yeah, if you live in an area with polar night | or whatever I don't think society should begrudge you an | incandescent bulb if that's what gets you through the winter. | noncoml wrote: | Thy these folks before making up your mind about LED lights: | | https://www.waveformlighting.com/ | | No flickering, high CRI. | ltbarcly3 wrote: | Who sponsored this terrible article? Should we also go back to | 25" console tv's that sit on the floor, with decorative brass | handles just so this author can avoid ever having anything be | different in their life? I've never, not even once, had an LED | bulb misbehave as described in this article. They are at least as | reliable as CFLs were, and although there are tradeoffs with | other bulb types both good and bad, LEDs consume effectively no | power compared to incandescent. | | From the article: ``` I'd put one in the bedroom-ceiling fixture | only a few months before. In theory, it should have been the last | I would put up there for years, maybe even a decade. Instead, the | bulb was a dim, dull orange, its levels of brightness visibly | fluttering through the frosted dome. ``` | | What? And then they go on to talk about how hard it is to | illegally find incandescent bulbs. This screams cognitive | dissonance. An incandescent bulb's normal way of responding after | several months to a year was to just not work anymore at all. | That was just 'normal' and you would swap them out. If you went | to any room in the country and looked at the light fixtures, you | had a very good chance of finding bulbs that were burned out. It | was normal to hear or say "we really need to replace the bulb in | the pantry" but in the meantime not be able to see in there very | well. Finding one led bulb that fails early is not an indictment | of the technology, even if it was defective. For all we know his | kid might have been throwing water balloons at it. | | LED bulbs are great, they are now incredibly cheap and there is | no reason to keep producing CO2 because of misoneic propaganda. | If we want to reduce carbon emissions, we either have to pass the | true cost of carbon to consumers, which would mean dramatically | increasing energy costs to people who likely can't afford that, | or we need to make it less likely to consume all that | artificially cheap electricity wastefully. LED bulbs are a great | way to do this. | CalRobert wrote: | This article discusses indoor lighting, but it's worth noting | that cheap, efficient outdoor LED lighting is destroying our | night sky, bathing everyone nearby (including animals!) in light | that screws up their circadian rhythms, and makes the city at | night a harsher place. | | savingourstars.org | karaterobot wrote: | Counterpoint: The transition to LEDs has been fine, even cheap | LEDs are fine, and this article feels like an unnecessary | problematizing. | SoftTalker wrote: | LED bulbs suck. CFLs suck. The light is poor and though they cost | an order of magnitude more than incandescents did, they are built | so cheaply that they don't last any longer. And they qualify as | hazardous waste when they need to be disposed of. At times I've | seriously considered trying oil lamps. | | The only LED bulbs I buy now are the "filament" types. Their | bulbs are filled with helium so heat transfer is good, and they | have a close-to-incandescent warm light color. I have had good | luck with their longevity so far, but haven't really used them | long enough to judge. | stasmo wrote: | It feels weird to me to see this kind of comment on HN. I'm | sure somewhere out there on the internet there are people | complaining that computers suck because they bought a few cheap | computers and didn't have a good experience, so they're | assuming all computers are bad. | | Without any sort of detail about what brand or what it was used | for and why it was a bad experience, it's really not adding | anything to the conversation. It's just a blanket judgement on | a technology that has a great deal of variation and options and | uses. | righttoolforjob wrote: | The regular consumer, like us, don't give a rats ass about | the technology behind the light, we just want them to work | well. The light is much, much worse than incandescents for | the typical consumer. That's what the article is about. Your | comment if anything is the weird one. | rwalle wrote: | What? What is weird about that comment? An LED light from a | random brand purchased from a random grocery store is very | likely to work just fine, and that is many people's | experience, so if your experience is different, you should | provide concrete evidence instead of hand waving or using | words like "worse" with no substance whatsoever. | righttoolforjob wrote: | Nothing hand-wavy about it. The article that this thread | is based on provides the evidence, and you are refuting | it. I am refuting your refutation. My experience aligns | exactly with the article, that nothing really got better, | and especially not the light in my rooms. | hoffs wrote: | The oil lamp is epitome of HN | SoftTalker wrote: | Whatever brands in the major stores. WalMart, Target, Lowes. | They all suck. I don't care to keep notes and do research on | _light bulbs_ , for fuck's sake. My spare time is worth more | to me than that. | e40 wrote: | Can you give an example sku? | bombcar wrote: | LEDs really DO suck and they're not tremendously bothering to | "unsuck" them. | | You do want to consider kerosine lamps - check out | https://www.sevarg.net/2022/10/09/keropunk-part-1-kerosene-l... | - browse around and he does some spectrum analysis of LED | bulbs, too - https://www.sevarg.net/2023/02/26/feit-electric- | wifi-rgb-bul... | gravesisme wrote: | I have gradually replaced every light bulb in my house since 2017 | with Philips Hue bulbs (most color, but some white only) and not | one of them has flickered, become more dim, or failed. On the | other hand, the "cheap $10" LED bulbs that I originally installed | when first moving in - because I could not afford $50 a bulb - | have all died and were part of my motivation for upgrading to | Hue. This has also happened with the cheaper LED bulbs that my | mother and in-laws installed, which lasted about a year. I wonder | why the Hue bulbs last so much longer? They have been well worth | the money and have become a staple of my home automation. | joshspankit wrote: | Can someone please make an "archive.is" clone that just does GPT | summaries for us HN folk? | zokier wrote: | LED lighting is just another victim of the general malaise of | consumer goods that is just unbounded race to the bottom, and | making it impossible for consumers to make informed choices and | instead having market flooded with lemons all around. | dbg31415 wrote: | I think the bulb versions of LEDs really do suck. | | Like... I was used to the GE Reveal 100W Incandescent Bulbs. For | comparison, the light bulbs with like a slight blue tint to them | that just worked great. | | I had them all over my house. | | But then when I did my remodel, I put in can lights. LEDs. | | And the can LEDs are really great. | | They're bright, they're the right color, they give off plenty of | consistent light. I went with 6" cans, and I used about 50% more | than they said to use... so like on the box it said, "Use 4 for a | room that's X by Y feet..." And I put in 6. No more than 1 every | 8 feet, no less than 1 every 5 feet. | | The cans have this little color toggle on the back, the only | thing I wish I had done is I wish they were all wifi lights... so | that I could use a different warmth after sundown. | | But hey, that'll be my next house. (= | | I think it's becoming more of an easy option for most contractors | to set up. | | https://justgetflux.com/lighting/ | nazgulsenpai wrote: | This is weird. I buy the most basic Dollar Tree LED bulbs for | every outlet in my home and I haven't had any of the problems in | the article (for about 4 years so far). Occasionally one will | blow then I just toss in another dollar bulb (maybe 4-5 so far). | The light color and "quality" is perfect too. Granted, I don't | have any fancy dimmer switches or anything but hey, maybe try the | basic Dollar Tree bulbs :) | willchis wrote: | I was about to post the exact same thing. They even had a | couple of warmth options and the 2700K ones seem to work just | fine in lamps that I use every day around the house. | simongray wrote: | This article and comment section is bizarre to me. It's like | travelling back in time to the 2000s. | | We've _only_ used LEDs in my country for, what, 15 years now? | They are perfectly fine, no issues really, much cheaper than | incandescent bulbs of course. We just buy the ones in IKEA and | they haven 't really failed us so far. | rootusrootus wrote: | > It's like travelling back in time to the 2000s. | | That's because it is. George W. Bush signed the death warrant | for the incandescent bulb in the US in 2007. Incandescent bulbs | are a niche product in the US, LEDs have been the mainstream | choice for years. | 01100011 wrote: | Seriously. I always thought I was very picky, both to | flickering and color temp(3000k FTW). Sure, the >3000K bulbs | look like death, and I've had issues with some bulbs | flickering, but overall I'm really happy with the light output | of my LEDs(color temp, CRI, stability, longevity). I'm in the | US too. Not sure what folks are complaining about. | cal85 wrote: | I guess you can't tell the difference? For me it's huge. I | recently changed my bathroom downlights from dimmable LEDs to | dimmable halogens, and it's so much nicer. The colour | temperature was the same, so I guess it's not that. It's | something else about the way they work. I don't profess to know | why, but I can absolutely tell the difference, and I have a | very clear preference now. And this is after a decade of me | being very bullish on LEDs for environmental reasons and | proudly fitting LEDs everywhere possible (expensive, carefully | chosen ones too, with appropriate colour temperature). At the | end of the day, LED light is just horrible for some reason. | globular-toast wrote: | I think it's the flicker. Pulse width modulation is evil. I'm | not aware of a single instance where it's preferable over an | analogue adjustment. It's a horrible and thoroughly "non- | human" solution to a problem. The most annoying thing for me | is that car headlights are now PWM LEDs. I can see the | flicker, especially in my peripheral vision. It's highly | distracting and annoying. | mastercheif wrote: | PWM headlights should be illegal. Full stop. | slaymaker1907 wrote: | I think PWM can be used with success if the frequency is | high enough. https://www.dxomark.com/flicker-the-display- | affliction/ claims that most people should be ok with PWM | above 250Hz. | CapsAdmin wrote: | I also have the ikea home smart bubls. They're dimmable and | can change color. | | It seems like some people are more sensetive to flickering | light. I've asked people every now and then when in a group | if they can tell the light is flickering, and I'm usually the | only one. The effect is pronounced in my peripheral vision | and somehow even more when drunk. | | I don't think these lights emit the entire spectrum of light | either, but a spectrum that "fools" us to think we're seeing | the whole spectrum. Maybe that feels uncomfortable for some? | | The ikea bulbs I have flicker a little when dimmed, but I | don't really mind. | tomtheelder wrote: | I had literally the exact opposite experience when swapping | mine out. Both the incandescent and halogen replacements | resulted in a _way_ better quality of lighting. And these | were just like "first ones off the shelf" from the Home Depot | or something- I'm not exactly sure it was maybe 10 years ago. | But I vividly remember thinking how much better the lighting | quality was, and I had far more options in terms of color | temp, which was great. | simongray wrote: | I'm sorry, but to me you mostly just sound like an audiophile | talking about how vinyl sounds better than CDs... | Spivak wrote: | They sound _different_ and that's the point. There's a | whole genre of music that sounds like vinyl or staticy | tapes. Clearly people like it. | | People are going to express preferences for one or the | other, telling people that LEDs are exact equivalents is | just wrong. | | We can say, "yes they're different, but the environment is | more important [1], suck it up" but it changes the tone. | | [1] Which is such a joke, the waste from my electric stove | or leaving the window open with the AC on uses more than | the savings from LEDs. Halogens are already more expensive | and you pay per watt so there's not some horrible | externality not being priced in. | cal85 wrote: | Fair! Although I'm just reporting my preference and not | making any contestable claims, other than that I can tell | the difference. If someone can make an LED bulb where I | can't tell the difference, then I'd fit my house with them, | but it seems like this must be impossible or someone would | have done it. | lambdaba wrote: | Just came to say I agree with your assessment 100%. I | think it's about the fact that incandescent light is a | broader spectrum. It seems to affect the say shadows are | cast etc. It's just not as nice as incandescent. | UberFly wrote: | That article was feverish. I think the author is making it a bit | too complicated. Also, there's much talk about the Met and their | art collection. Even with the challenges of LED bulbs, they | wouldn't go back. Damaging UV is no longer a problem with LEDs. | sizzle wrote: | Bought several boxes of 10 LED bulbs from Costco, the brand | "Feit" and literally every bulb flickered and died in a few | months. So disappointing. | cyberax wrote: | One thing that bothers me is that our current wiring is not well- | suited for LEDs. Each lamp has to have a rectifier, and there's | only so much you can do to squeeze in enough circuitry into the | LED base. | | So I shopped around for alternatives. It turns out that we're now | standardizing on 24V DC wiring for lighting for commercial | buildings, which makes sense. 24V can be directly used by LEDs | wired in series, and the wiring cross-section is similar to 120V | lamps. | | I even found some dim-to-warm 24V LEDs. But so far they are all | kinda niche. I don't want to risk buying hardware from a supplier | that can go out of business in a couple of years, leaving me with | a slowly degrading system. | | If you want to try, then search Google for "tunable-white | lighting". | antisthenes wrote: | I have begun to use grow lights everywhere as regular lights. | | They emit a pleasant looking spectrum, have good heat sinks for | longevity, have high-quality ballasts, built-in dimmers and do | not flicker. | | They also blow out any alternative out of the water when it comes | to pure brightness for precision work (soldering, painting minis, | etc.) | | They are also fairly cheap (can find some lights as low as | 50c/watt on sale) | | Oh and lastly - I can always just move them and use them to grow | any kind of plants (wink wink, nudge) | dashundchen wrote: | Don't many grow lamps emit UV? I would be slightly concerned | about potential eye and skin damage over time. | antisthenes wrote: | So does the Sun. | | Also, you never look at the light directly. | AlanYx wrote: | The sun's spectrum is relatively smooth, whereas there are | some grow lights that have a narrow, intense spike of UV | designed to match chlorophyll B's absorption. Not all grow | lights have this spectrum, but it's worth being careful. | It's one of the reasons why some grow lights come with a | warning about using eye protection. | antisthenes wrote: | That's a good point, although I'm pretty sure the Sun | still trumps any kind of LED grow light output, | especially during summer months. | | That being said, maybe it's a good idea to use a | plexiglass UV filter when using it as a workshop light. | dashundchen wrote: | My understanding is outside, your pupils will dilate as | the light increases, protecting your retina from | increased UV. If you had a strong emitter of UV in a | relatively dim room, your pupils wouldn't shrink and | would allow more damaging UV to hit your retinas. | antisthenes wrote: | I'm not sure where you got this understanding from, but | the LED lights I'm talking about (grow lights) are | definitely bright enough to make your pupils shrink. | | > If you had a strong emitter of UV in a relatively dim | room | | A 150 watt LED right above your head is the opposite of | dim. | cramjabsyn wrote: | Cheap LED bulbs generate the worst light I've ever experienced. | But after some research I found that there are options that make | a nice warm light with no perceptible flickering. | | Personally I prefer the phillips warm glow dimmable bulbs | btbuilder wrote: | Have you had any lifetime issues with these? I bought a dozen | and a significant number started emitting warm color while at | full brightness instead of just dimmed. | anotheryou wrote: | Mine lasted 3 years. (100w equivalent, 3 dim stages built in | ("sceneswitch")). | | Now I had some flickers in recent weeks but they went away | again, not sure what had caused it. | cramjabsyn wrote: | No lifetime issues so far. I've been using their GU10 halogen | substitutes for I want to say about 5 years | npteljes wrote: | Right up there with the horrible neon light my schools had. | rootusrootus wrote: | Yeah this is one of those things where quality really makes the | difference. If you buy cheap LED bulbs, you'll hate LED bulbs. | Buy goods ones, and you love them. The dichotomy is really | stark in the overall HN discussion. | VoodooJuJu wrote: | I fucking hate LEDs. Turned my back on them years ago because the | tech and its salesmen turned their back on me. Nothing but lies. | | I've been using 15-25 watt traditional incandescents in a bunch | of lamps around the house and they're absolutely amazing. | Consistent light, cheap, and comfy _as hell_ - the warm fire-like | glow appeals to my caveman sensibilities. So much better than | soulless, flickering, sun-bright but ice-cold LEDs. I feel | better, see better, sleep better, my house is just so cozy. | | Thankfully, the low-watt appliance bulbs that I use seem to be | exempt under the coming ban. And if they were banned, I'd find a | way to make them on my own - I'm never parting with them. | pmarreck wrote: | I was an LED early adopter and many more of them have failed | early than I expected, even if I followed the rules of not | putting them inside an enclosure not open to the air, etc. | | Regarding the color criticism(s), it's wonderfully subjective and | it's definitely a case of "once you see it, you can't unsee it". | Early bulbs were too blue in color temperature; later ones | finally got the color temperature right (at least technically) | but something else still seems "off" sometimes. | | There needs to be a way to read reviews of these, AND people need | to be willing to spend more money on quality. | jgalt212 wrote: | LED bulbs make me made because I can't yell at my kids to turn | off the lights like my dad used to do to me. | wombatpm wrote: | Sure you can. My wife yells at me all the time. I says they are | LED stop complaining. She says they are still wasting energy, | doesn't matter the amount. | balfirevic wrote: | Sure you can, but only if you're willing to be unreasonable. | ghaff wrote: | I still reflexively tend to turn off lights. Even though I | intellectually know that, besides some halogen track lights I | still have, my LED bulbs don't really move the power needle | for my house. | shusaku wrote: | LED Christmas lights are great because I can leave them on | guilt free | timetraveller26 wrote: | I on the other hand hate when people yell at you to turn off | the light! | davidy123 wrote: | Incandescent generate heat, they're great if you need heat and | one tone of light and that's it. | | LEDs are part of a progression to everything being addressable, | think of them as pixels. There's a decreasing incentive to not | make everything addressable and support not just dimming but also | colour. This is ultimately a completely different approach to | environments. Transitioning from "the lights are on and I can | easily see my broccoli" to very fine relationships between | sources and qualities of light and their interpretation. Some of | the benefits will be emergent, which sounds like hand-waving, and | sometimes it is. (-: | PaulHoule wrote: | My benchmark for light quality is "can I tell the difference | between the two sides of | | https://www.redrivercatalog.com/browse/60lb-polar-matte.html | | ?" and I'd say that LED bulbs do OK when I set them on the high | color temperature (blueish) settings and poorly on the warm color | temperature side. This company | | https://www.solux.net/cgi-bin/tlistore/index.html | | became famous for high color temperature lights for art museums | also used to make an advanced incandescent bulb that had | something like a halogen bulb inside of it. Those bulbs do really | well on my test, I still have a stock of them, and I use them | when I need to make fine color distinctions. I've seen bulbs with | a similar construction for sale at Dollar General but I haven't | tested them. | | Note there is a tradeoff between an RGB bulb that gives really | saturated colors and one that gives good color rendition. If | saturation was what mattered you'd want laser-like spectral | lines, for color rendition you want each component to have a | broad spectrum. | | There's no reason why LED light can't have excellent quality | however anyone defines quality because you're not limited to the | raw output of the LED but you can tune the output with a | phosphor. Consumers have to demand something better though and | the market has to respond. | aftbit wrote: | I'm still looking for an ideal LED bulb for use everywhere. I've | mostly settled on Hyperikon. My desired specs: * | A19 base * 2700K * 7-11W (at typical efficiencies, | not sure about lumens) * dimmable with very high dynamic | range (fully dimmed should be just barely lit) * good color | rendering (high CRI / R9) * good PSU design for long life | * flicker free under all circumstances * cheapish (< | $10/bulb) | | The irony is that there is a deep flashlight enthusiast community | that focus on all of these specs (except maybe the high dynamic | range), but when you look for A19 bulbs, they're all just using | whatever is at Home Depot. :/ | selimnairb wrote: | I find that with LED bulbs you need to read the box carefully. | Putting an LED bulb not rated for enclosures into an enclosure | often results in early failures. | pleb_nz wrote: | Focusing on reliability, quality and performance I've had nothing | but an excellent run with LEDs, both retro and built into the | home for 10 years. Never replaced anything on any of them. And | not just me proud I've talked with as well. | | The only issue I have with LED is the light isn't as nice as | incandescent and although I'm not certain it may not be as good | for your health. | | Be interesting to know more about the context is the authors | experience doesn't seem to be the same for everyone | EMM_386 wrote: | I was just staying in a hotel where it was obvious that the | hallway lighting was all LED. | | It had that harsh, strange white hue to it and I found it | incredibly distracting and unattractive. | | I'm no expert in the field, and I assume there are bulbs that put | out a more natural spectrum, but clearly this hotel didn't buy | _those_ bulbs. It felt strange to walk down that hallway, just | something "off" about it. | gaudat wrote: | Is it just me or is there something off about this article? It | reads quite incoherent. | | I happen to work with a lot of LED light sources nowadays and I | can see most problems discussed are related to the light fixture, | driver or psychology. More often than not it is the capacitors in | these mains powered LEDs that fail first, because the circuit is | designed to run at the highest temperature possible to lower the | cost of the final product. The bulbs, or LED chips, looks quite | innocent in this regard. | throwthrowuknow wrote: | Lol, there is no problem, you're the problem, actually it is | faulty. | last_responder wrote: | Green account . A mod? Admin? Either way reported. | malfist wrote: | Green accounts mean it's new, if you couldn't tell by their | trollish post. | everybodyknows wrote: | > run at the highest temperature possible | | So consumers in hot climates who abstain from A/C cooling will | suffer such failures disproportionately. | melff wrote: | Well, I'd guess for most people it doesn't matter whether the | LED-chips themselves, capacitors, or some other part of the | circuitry fails. If cost-cut cheap LED bulbs with components | driven to the max are the norm, consumers will obviously | associate LED bulbs with the kind of problems that causes and | not with what LED tech could be if it'd be given more budget to | breathe. | jonas21 wrote: | For me, the biggest issue with LED bulbs is flicker. And there's | a lot of variation between different bulbs, even ones that claim | to be flicker-free. There are metrics for quantifying flicker | [1], and hopefully they'll be required to print this on the | packaging at some point. | | For now, I always go to see bulbs in person before buying them, | and record them in slow-motion video on my phone. This makes it | easy to tell which ones flicker badly and which don't. | | [1] https://www.energy.gov/eere/ssl/articles/flicker- | understandi... | FpUser wrote: | I do not really use LED light bulbs. I use already made LED | lamps. Big round ones for ceiling and some long strips in my | office on bottom side of shelves. All cheap China made stuff. | Works for years not a single problem. Color temp is ok. | roryisok wrote: | This post reads awfully whiny to me. Who cares if the new bulb | that's 90% more energy efficient than your old incandescent is | not exactly the same color as the totally unnatural electric | light you grew up with? Sure, there are some niche areas like the | gallery mentioned, where the color and evenness of the light is | quite important to display a work of art properly, but the bulb | in your downstairs toilet not being yellow enough is not | something to get worked up over. | | This is as vapid and facile an argument as petrol heads | complaining that electric cars don't sound right. | TylerE wrote: | And even if you are... I use Wi-Fi smart bulbs that cost less | than $10 each, full then as well as a white temperature | adjustable from an extreme warm orange to piercing blue. 90+ | CRI too. | sydd wrote: | Because there are many more issues: | | - The issue is not that they are "not the same color", but that | they have a low CRI which means that they make look everything | bland and greyscale. | | - That they use some shitty low frequency PWM to drive the | light causing eye fatigue and headaches | | - That they use low quality electronics causing your bulb to | fail as fast as an iridescent one that costs 5 times less. | | What you are saying sounds a bit like someone complaining why | people want to move on from CRT monitors. | diebeforei485 wrote: | LED bulbs that have a similar color as old incandescent bulbs are | widely available now for in-home use. It's no longer limited to | fancy bulbs like Philips Hue. | | That being said, I am not a fan of the white LED streetlights. | Streetlight LED's should be orange. | davidmurdoch wrote: | My pool pump and AC will cost me about $700 US this month. | Switching from incandescent to LED bulbs might have saved me a | few dollars. And for what? For expensive bulbs that flicker, | don't reproduce colors well, last less than a year, and undulate | and buzz when dimmed (yes, the dimmable ones)? I think we've been | bamboozled by the light bulb industry. | pdabbadabba wrote: | Wow, what kind of awful bulbs are you buying? I have literally | a house full of LED bulbs, some of which are on dimmers, and | have experienced literally none of these problems. Just for | starters, I haven't had a single LED bulb fail in the 8-odd | years I've been using them in my home. | | But maybe there's an argument that you have to pay a | significant premium to get a bulb that doesn't have the issues | you've run into and, once you factor that premium into account, | LED bulbs aren't worth it. But some of the broad claims here, | and in the article, about the allegedly poor performance of LED | bulbs just don't cohere at all with my experience with them. I | made a point of buying high quality bulbs that are dimmable, | don't flicker, and have the color temperature and CRI that I | want and...well...that's exactly what I got. | axus wrote: | I've had plenty fail, stuff from the grocery store, Home | Depot, Lowes. Actually the fan-size bulbs I ordered from | Amazon were the worst ones, which I expected since it was | almost the cheapest. Interestingly, the generic ones I got | from a state-sponsored efficiency program have been the best. | | But the ones that didn't fail have been fine, and lasted for | years. Like CPUs, the yields aren't good but the ones that | pass give good service for a long time. | davidmurdoch wrote: | Perhaps it's the 50 year old house I live in, but lots of | Phillips brand, also whatever the Lowes and Home Depot in- | house brands are. I bought Kree in bulk for my last house | about 10 years ago and that was a huge mistake. | | As for the color reproduction issue... you do experience it, | I imagine you haven't done color critical work under | incandescent and then under LEDs? | | I do have some stupidly expensive $29 D-50 compliant LEDs in | my office that don't bother me at all. One failed after about | 9 months, but the company replaced it for free. | | Anyway, I'm highly sensitive to LED flicker, and my wife | apparently can hear the buzz from rooms away. | | At risk of sounding like a consistent theorist...The market | factors that led to the lighting industry forming a "cartel" | 100 years ago are certainly alive and well today. I think | it's likely that these manufacturers are only selling energy | efficient lightbulbs to make more money than they otherwise | would -- it's certainly not to save the planet. | tomtheelder wrote: | > As for the color reproduction issue... you do experience | it, I imagine you haven't done color critical work under | incandescent and then under LEDs? | | High quality LEDs with a good CRI are vastly better for | that sort of work. You don't want to be doing anything like | that under 2700k incandescent light. | davidmurdoch wrote: | Well yeah, that's why I said I have $29 D-50 compliant | LEDs in my office. Though CRI, to an extent is more | important than color temperature, since with high CRI | under warm light you can still get a great sense for | relative colors and contrast, but not so much with a | mediocre CRI under a daylight bulb. | | I'm not an LED hater. But I do think the Lightbulb | industry has taken advantage of us in not so honest ways, | as expected by their shareholders. | dpkirchner wrote: | What brand do you buy and how did you evaluate it beforehand? | noneeeed wrote: | I'm reading these comments and thinking the same. While I | have had a handful fail quicker than I think they should, on | the whole ours are great. A bunch of them are dimmable, most | are warm-white for a cosier light. | | We can turn on every light in the house and it will use less | than 200w. With incandescents and halogens (for gu10s) I'd be | looking at more than that just to light the bathroom. The | whole house would use about 1.5kw. Given that the lights are | on a lot outside of summer (I'm in the UK) that's a pretty | big saving. | Waterluvian wrote: | We wire our homes with a whole bunch of AC circuits. These are | basically busses, right? Why not add more kinds of busses? Why | not a DC bus? Every light in my home is an LED, and most | appliances (by count) are DC. | | I understand that moving DC long distances can be problematic. | But is 100-300 feet too long? Am I completely off on this? | | This feels like a legacy inefficiency issue. | sbradford26 wrote: | DC actually tends to be more efficient at long distances at the | same voltage. DC lighting does exist in the commercial space | where lighting costs actually start to add up more than | household use. The main barrier to DC systems in homes is | simply that it would require houses to be rewired and a whole | new standard for plugs and such. The benefit is also hard to | describe to the customer. | Waterluvian wrote: | The limitations you describe make sense. But they seem like | we can overcome them. | | My home has 3 non-plumbing busses: AC to every room. Twisted | pair to like 6 rooms that will never see use. Coax to 7 rooms | that is only used for a modem in one room. | | If we can run all that wiring, I think we can introduce a new | standard for upcoming homes. | | In fact, now that I think of it, my home has a trait that the | homes I grew up in never had: the overhead lighting and the | wall receptacles are never on the same circuits. ... I wonder | if I can re-use the 14-2 Romex for DC and retrofit one or two | rooms myself and see how it works? (I recognize this is a bad | idea for many reasons, such as them being indistinguishable | and wrongly colour coded, making it a dangerous trap for | future owners). | mindslight wrote: | It's definitely a path dependency issue. Last mile | neighborhood distribution is still done with traditional | transformers, so trying to push in this direction you'd | ultimately just be _adding_ another conversion step in | homes. IMO the only time it makes (individual) sense is if | your home has a huge bank of storage batteries for off-grid | operation. | | The main advantage you'd get is no 120Hz flickering (light | bulbs would still need power electronics because LEDs are | driven by current rather than voltage), no 60Hz hum on | motors, etc. But you'd be stepping away from the massive | economies of scale of the consumer market. | | FWIW what voltage(s) would you pick, and why? There's no | free lunch here. | sbradford26 wrote: | So POE lighting is something that is taking off for | businesses but could also be more easily retrofitted into a | house. This would put the conversion from AC to DC in a | centralized area which allows for more efficient hardware | to be used. | | Ubiquiti for a while had hardware you can order not sure if | they still do. | formerly_proven wrote: | There's a lot wrong with LEDs in general and retrofit (E27 bulbs) | in particular. In no particular order | | - LED emitters driven hard for cost reasons, age and fail quickly | | - Power supplies driven hard for cost reasons, age and fail | quickly | | - Poor CRI and SSRI | | - Flickering | | - Dim-to-warm is uncommon | | - Poorly designed power supplies that age and fail quickly | | - The same light _quality_ is vastly more expensive to achieve | with LEDs, even if you account for high electricity prices. Good | indoor lighting is now something only people with plenty of | disposable income can afford. | | - It is quite difficult to even buy high quality LEDs as a mere | mortal | | - Retrofits generally work poorly on principle | | - LEDs mix exceptionally poorly, making things even more | expensive | guerrilla wrote: | - LED emitters driven hard for cost reasons, age and fail | quickly - Power supplies driven hard for cost reasons, | age and fail quickly - Poorly designed power supplies | that age and fail quickly | | These are all features from the producers POV. Planned | obsolescence. - Poor CRI and SSRI | | This is true for all cheap lights, you gotta pay for that. | timw4mail wrote: | Not to mention space constraints for power supplies, and | cooling the LEDs enough. | | For all the benefits of LED lights, incandescent bulbs are | infinitely simpler. | Cthulhu_ wrote: | Simpler and better light, but bad energy efficiency. | | Although, as was pointed out to me at some point, because | LEDs are more efficient, people feel less guilty about having | more of them; replacing 1x40 watt bulb with 8x5 watt LEDs | means the net result is the same. I've got like 7 cute LED | spotlights in my TV closet for example, I wouldn't have had | that setup if I was forced to use incandescent lamps. | sgregnt wrote: | Energy efficiency wise, in cold weather it warms the | apartment which is desirable in my case. | saulpw wrote: | Jevons Paradox in action. | galleywest200 wrote: | > cooling the LEDs enough | | Maybe I am missing something from this conversation, but all | of my LED bulbs produce far _less_ heat than incandescent | bulbs. The lamp in my bedroom no longer keeps me warm! | rini17 wrote: | But LEDs are very sensitive to heat, so even the small | amount of heat will cause gradual dimming. | orev wrote: | By cooling the issue is that LEDs and the driving | electronics will become damaged with heat, while an | incandescent has simple parts which can easily survive | inside an oven. This matters when used in fixtures like | recessed ceiling cans where there's no ventilation. The | LEDs just cook themselves while incandescents don't care. | organsnyder wrote: | When my garage+office was built a few years ago, the | electrician used a bunch of faux-recessed LED fixtures | (the brand name is "I Can't Believe It's Not Recessed!", | which is certainly memorable). They surface-mount over | standard ceiling junction boxes, but appear similar to | recessed lights once installed. We have ~20 of these | fixtures, both interior and exterior. They're quiet, | flicker-free, and have a great dimming curve (with the | standard Z-wave dimmers I've used). We've had no failures | so far after almost four years, so they've passed the | leading edge of the bathtub curve. | | I think it's much easier to design entire fixtures than | retrofit bulbs, as there's much more control over heat | dissipation and so on. Finding trusted manufacturers (and | supply chains that resist counterfeits) is also extremely | important. | droopyEyelids wrote: | The faux-recessed LED fixtures are a really interesting | case because they're either going to be the most reliable | LED in your house, or one of the least! This is because | heat is the LED diode killer (as well as the power | supplies driving the diodes) | | Can lights have historically been an issue for insulation | of houses, as they provide a channel for the warm ceiling | air to enter the plenum space between floors or the | attic. Thats bad for insulation, but actually amazing for | a retrofitted LED light, because it's the only fixture | that will provide airflow to cool it! | | On the other hand, faux-recessed LEDs can also be | installed directly on top of the ceiling drywall, without | any penetration. Thats the worst case scenario for heat | build up, as heat rises and it's completely trapped by | the dish of the light and the ceiling. | organsnyder wrote: | Absolutely! The faux-recessed lights made it a ton easier | to do air-sealing, which is now essential to pass | mandatory blower-door tests. | 1980phipsi wrote: | You will find that you will need to search a bit harder to | find an LED light that is rated to work with enclosed | fixtures. Enclosed fixtures don't allow the same amount of | cooling as a normal lamp. | weberer wrote: | Yes, but incandescent bulbs don't need to be cooled at all | because they're just tungsten and glass. High powered LEDs | require a heat sink to not damage the diode. | willis936 wrote: | I've moved three times with one set of cheap LED bulbs | without having to replace a single one. I'd have gone | thorough dozens of incandescent bulbs in the same time | period. I'd have also burned my hand on a few. | | LEDs are definitely simpler than incandescent from a user | perspective. | sidewndr46 wrote: | It is interesting you cite that the cost has went up for | lighting. Where I live the government owned utility often | raises their rates per kwHr. One of the reasons they cite is | the increase in efficiency leading to a drop in revenue each | year. | | The same utility pays for those efficiency projects. | xeromal wrote: | On my first read of this, it makes sense though. The mileage | of infrastructure is the same regardless of use. Those | powerlines still need maintenance even if LEDs are making | homes more efficient. | sidewndr46 wrote: | Sure, but I'm billed by kw-Hr. Bill me for the | infrastructure if that is what costs money. | jsmith45 wrote: | > - Dim-to-warm is uncommon | | Yeah, I love Alec's Technology Connections video on some bulbs | with that feature, but he pointed it partly because some of the | few bulbs that offered it seemed to be getting phased out. | | Its much like a bunch of other points on the list. There are a | fair few that would only add a small amount of additional cost, | but because the companies can save money by not doing it, they | don't. | | It does not actually cost all that much more to add a few more | diodes, to avoid severely overdriving the ones on the board, or | to improve the power supply circuitry so that it will likely | last longer. | | But it really sucks that even if you chose to buy the more | premium tier bulbs being offered at the big box store, they | often don't fix some of these issues. They may have a better | CRI, but are still often overdriven, with questionable power | supply designs. | lacrosse_tannin wrote: | What is the embodied energy of all those high tech parts? | | An incandescent lightbulb is a piece of tungsten wire. | Bluzzard wrote: | [dead] | samstave wrote: | I have every single light bulb in my house (and outside my | house) as an LED RGB Alexa-addressible light, and I love it. | | "Set all the lights to red" and every single bulb in my house | and porch and walkway and garage etc, all turn red. | | "Turn on/off all the light" | | Set kitchen to firebrick... | | Etc. | | I LOVE IT. | | During the day I rarely have any lights on at all - but at | night I have precise control over every bulb in my house with | alexa voice. | | I initially would never have put alexa in my home, but now that | I have it and all bulbs on it, as well as several alexa-fied | power outlets, its just a very nice thing to have. | | Im not too concerned over "lighting quality" - as I get exactly | what I want. | | The bulbs I bought were from Costco, where they had them on | sale for $5 for a (2) pack. so I replaced all CFLs with RGB | Wifi LEDs with alexa, and it was ~$70 to do the whole house | (27) bulbs. | | EDIT: Dimmability "Alexa Set Kitchen to 10%" --> I can dim or | brighten all the lights at once "Alexa set house to 100%" | etc... | tablespoon wrote: | > There's a lot wrong with LEDs in general and retrofit (E27 | bulbs) in particular. In no particular order | | If all that's true, it explains my experience that LEDs have | totally failed to live up to their promise. Sure, they use less | power than incandescents, but they're far more expensive and | also more finicky. They were supposed to last a decade, but I'm | lucky if I get a year or two out of them. I wonder what the | environmental impact is when you factor in e-waste and | manufacturing costs. | | About the only clear win for me is they run much cooler, which | is nice when you have underpowered AC (or no AC). | | > - LEDs mix exceptionally poorly, making things even more | expensive | | I'm not sure exactly what you mean here, but (compared to | incandescents), different models of LED differ significantly in | light characteristics and start up time. More than once I've | had to replace all the bulbs in a fixture, because I couldn't | buy and equivalent replacement for one that failed. | amluto wrote: | > The same light quality is vastly more expensive to achieve | with LEDs, even if you account for high electricity prices. | | In a screw base, maybe. But compare: | | https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/luminus-devices-i... | | $25 for an excellent 700mA driver, 86% efficient. | | https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/bridgelux/BXRH-30... | | $3.45 for a very nice, ~2000lm 97 CRI LED, about 99 lm/W. | (Efficiency goes up quite a bit if you settle for 90 CRI.) | | So that gives about 2000lm at about 25W, for <$30. | | Wikipedia gives about 16 lm/W for incandescent, so 125W. At 10 | hour per day, the LED options pays for itself quickly even at | national average prices. In CA, it's very fast. | | To be fair, for high-end LEDs like this, the balance of the | system is more expensive, because you need a heat sink. | Incandescent lamps run very hot and don't need heat sinks. | | I think this is potentially promising, but I don't think you | can buy it: | | https://tlo.mit.edu/technologies/high-efficiency-incandescen... | DougN7 wrote: | This is just an anecdote, but I've had multiple "10 year" LED | bulbs fail after just a year or two. I suspect much of the | claims for these bulbs are theoretical as they just don't | hold up, probably for reasons the grandparent poster is | pointing out. | iso1631 wrote: | On the other hand I lived in my last house for 5 years and | didn't replace a single bulb. | tomatocracy wrote: | When I moved into my current place 5 years ago a lot of | the lighting was 12V MR16 halogen bulbs. I replaced most | of them with high CRI Philips Master LEDspots | (specifically marketed as having a longer lifetime aimed | at commercial installations but they weren't | significantly more expensive vs "consumer" versions at | the time if you were looking for high CRI anyway) and | kept the transformers in place. I've had one fail out of | probably 50 or so bulbs in that time, which feels about | par for the course to me. | RHSeeger wrote: | Others have commented, but to reiterate | | - Older LEDs house bulbs were much worse than newer ones; | far more prone to failure from "things". I had many of them | fail after only a few months because our power was | "flickery" and their power supplies could not handle it. | That's _far_ less common now. | | - The power supply / controller circuitry is not a fan of | heat. Don't mount them upside down (so the heat floats up | to the circuit) and never mount them in a recessed mount. | The heat buildup will destroy them a lot quicker. That | being said, this advice can be ignored is you're paying | attention... mounts that have a way to heat to escape; | bulbs that are designed to go in upside-down mounts | (maybe?), etc. | | - While you certainly don't want to always buy the most | expensive bulb, you also don't want to buy the cheap ones. | They are far more likely to be made from poor, failure | prone components. | ajross wrote: | I have too. I have significantly more in my 11-year-old | renovation that are still working. That's just the way | statistics work. | | A lot of this topic smells like typical geek snobbery. | They're lights, folks. Cheap consumer products have always | been cheap. Halogen bulbs suck too. | sgc wrote: | I have had at least 10 bulbs die on me within months, | while others have lasted much longer, but the average | lifespan on bulbs in our house can't be over 18 months. | So I don't think people are complaining to be snobs, just | noting that led bulbs don't last nearly as long as | claimed. I have no idea why you needed to fall into | personal attacks rather than concluding that bulbs | readily available 11 years ago might be made better than | those readily available now, and that most led bulbs are | a lot newer than yours. | mrguyorama wrote: | People have a terrible tendency as well to blame the bulb | when it's just overheating in a really bad fixture. | TexanFeller wrote: | All the big name brand(Cree etc.) bulbs I've bought have | been going strong for 5-12 years. Out of dozens the only | ones I've ever had fail were off brand or special purpose | like LIFX wifi bulbs. | kldavis4 wrote: | 3 year warranty instead of 10, but I've had a lot of | problems with Philips LED Flicker-Free Dimmable BR30 Indoor | Light Bulb. They consistently die and need to be replaced | within a year or so. I replaced a couple under warranty but | just gave up after the hassle involved. I've tried other | brands without success and would love to know what a good | reliable alternative would be. | sizzle wrote: | Same for me the brand is "Feit Electric" from Costco. Avoid | this brand! | dwighttk wrote: | In my experience LEDs have been a little more reliable than | CFL, but that's not saying much... those things you could | almost watch burn out. | gambiting wrote: | If we're sharing anecdotes - I've had my homes 100%(or | close) LED equipped for over a decade now and never had a | single LED bulb fail. | jhartwig wrote: | I wish I could say that. I have a 3 year old house that | is about 3k square feet wiht alot of bulbs. Every bulb | installed was LED and I have replaced most of them at | this point, and some more then once. I have even had the | electrical company come out thinking there was something | wrong with the power in my house or the breaker box. | Nothing... | smolder wrote: | I'm repeating myself a lot in this thread, so I'm sorry. | What fixtures are the bulbs in? Are they a generic design | meant for incandescents? A huge number of fixtures out | there don't allow for enough heat to convect away and the | bulbs overheat. | mrguyorama wrote: | It usually comes down to the brand, factors you can't be | aware of like component choice, and the light fixture | itself. A lot of LED edison socket lights die quickly in | recessed lighting or other tight fixtures because the | heat is death to them. Manufacturers build the worst | technically functional capacitors into the power supplies | with a low temperature rating, meaning they really can't | handle anything above ambient. | | This is also the same industry and the same players that | were perfectly fine with agreeing to not improve | incandescent light past 1000 lifetime hours, illegally. I | have no doubt that there is a tacit agreement not to make | good lighting, as that would extremely disrupt the | industry. | imtringued wrote: | Lightbulbs are a bad form factor. I have some lights | without bulbs and no issue. Meanwhile the halogen | emulating LEDs break all the time. | bryanlarsen wrote: | Exactly. Luckily halogens were commonly installed in | pots. So for longevity, replace the pot rather than the | bulb. | samtho wrote: | I am in the same boat, but they do tend to become | significantly dimmer over time. | jghn wrote: | My understanding is that the quality of LED bulbs has | been going down over time. In other words, newer bulbs | are less likely to stand the test of time than older | bulbs. | ajmurmann wrote: | I think there might be something about the wiring in some | homes. Some of my LED bulbs have been going for a decade | now without issues. I have a few fixtures where bulbs | keep hauling in specific sockets after a few months. I | have one fixture in my bathroom where a bulb was fine for | a few months and then two replacement bulbs failed | instantly and three third one failed again after a year | or so. Maybe the voltage is wrong and keeps breaking the | power supply? | smolder wrote: | It could be sensitive power circuitry failing due to | power quality, but is more likely a heat buildup. LEDs | bulbs fail rapidly without good convective cooling | ability, particularly in locations where you have the | bulb on for great lengths of time. | kitsunesoba wrote: | Similarly, I started buying Philips Hue bulbs back around | 2015 and none of those have failed in the time since, | even being used every night since then. | | They're all in freestanding floor lamps installed in a | horizontal orientation, which might have something to do | with it. That seems like it'd dissipate heat a lot better | than e.g. a pot light housing in the ceiling. | katbyte wrote: | +1 for hue colour/white adjustable ones | | They produce great light at the temperature you want and | I've yet to have one fail after nearly 10 years using | them. | | Not cheap, but given I've never had to replace one maybe | in the end they are | xxpor wrote: | They were expensive pre-covid, but since covid they have | become completely unhinged. | | https://www.amazon.com/Philips-Hue-Bluetooth-compatible- | Assi... | | $45 a bulb! That's probably >$2000 to replace a house's | worth. | | The white, color-temp only ones are about half the price, | which is better, but still not cheap: | | https://www.amazon.com/Philips-Ambiance-Hue-Equivalent- | Assis... | pm215 wrote: | My experience has fallen into two categories: | | * bulbs with the UK-standard bayonet fitting in light | sockets that are suspended from cables from the ceiling | with lampshades -- these I don't think I've ever had fail | on me yet | | * 4.6W bulbs with a GU10 fitting in recessed spotlights | -- these fail on me more frequently (perhaps every few | years to every five years) | | My assumption is that this is all down to the spotlight- | fitting bulbs being in a confined space and getting a lot | hotter. I use Philips bulbs in both cases. | vel0city wrote: | I've had some generally good experiences with LEDs as | well. The only places that I've had somewhat higher | failure rates for LEDs were places where I wanted a lot | of light but the existing fixture had the bulbs trapped | deep inside an enclosed fixture. I ended up buying a | different brand than I normally do since it seemed the | bulbs I had been going with just couldn't survive that | hotbox, but since trying another brand the bulbs have | lasted a couple of years so far. | | Otherwise, for probably at least 40 or so bulbs swapped | for LEDs over the years, I've experienced maybe 4 or 5 | failures. The vast majority of my bulbs have been Feit | and GE. I never buy smart bulbs. My best experiences have | usually been to just buy LED fixtures though, I replaced | a lot of my flush mount ceiling fixtures and ceiling fans | for ones with integrated LEDs and have not had a single | failure so far after a few years, knock on wood. | | I had some problems with my old dimmer switches, but | upgrading dimmers to newer ones which advertised good LED | dimming and ensuring I had bulbs which stated dimming | compatibility it eliminated my noise and flicker issues. | There's a recent standard out there, NEMA SSL 7A, which | seeks to ensure good compatibility. I set my dimmers to | this SSL 7A mode and I've had no problems since. | | https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/asset/docu | men... | britzkopf wrote: | I'll add a second identical anecdote. I've witnessed about | a dozen die after about doing about 1/10th their promised | duty. | smolder wrote: | Are they in fixtures designed for incandescents? "Boob | lamps" for example are highly efficient LED bulb | destroyers, since they don't breathe, and the bulbs | overheat. | ubercore wrote: | More anecdata, but I had ~20 lights, of various quality | (many Hue, some cheaper Home Depot specials) in boob | lamps that survived at least 11 summers in a New England | house without AC. Still there probably, but I moved out | so I can only vouch for 11 years. | vikingerik wrote: | 10 years isn't a minimum threshold for every item. Any | individual item could fail any time, and the overall | distribution will have a shape somewhere between a bell | curve and a long tail. | | I don't know if there are any regulations around the | 10-year claim, but if there are then I'd expect that it's | either an average or something like a one-standard- | deviation threshold, like 68% last past that but 32% don't. | | "Guaranteed 10 years" doesn't actually say anything about | expected lifetime at all, just that they'll do a warranty | replacement if it fails sooner. | Dylan16807 wrote: | One standard deviation would mean that 16% fail early and | 16% last extra long. If the distribution is normal. | | Personally I'd want a durability guarantee to be more | like two standard deviations, on top of replacement in | case of early failure. | JohnFen wrote: | Almost all LED bulb failures are because the power supply | died due to overheating, not the LEDs themselves. I harvest | the LEDs out of dead bulbs to use in hobby projects. | | With Edison-style bulbs, anyway, the orientation they're | mounted in makes a huge amount of difference. They're last | a lot longer if they're oriented upright (base down) than | in any other orientation because it reduces the heat | buildup in the power supply. | jandrese wrote: | Sometimes it is the power supply, but I've also had a | number that died simply because one LED burned out and | failed open. Because they are wired in series it only | takes one failed LED to take out the entire bulb. If | you're a cheapskate you can sometimes get a bulb working | again by testing the circuit and bypassing the burned out | LED with a jumper wire. | | If the bulb dies but you notice that all of the elements | are still just barely on (like a dim spot of light in the | middle of each one) then that's a good indication that | you have a dead LED. | cogman10 wrote: | This is the frustrating thing about LEDs that IDK we can | change. | | If there was a "DC" light socket in the house we could | have LEDs outlasting owners, and for cheap. Nearly all | the expense of LED bulbs is the power supply. Everything | else is dirt cheap. A single home DC power supply with | ~200W of output could light an entire house, flicker | free. | | What's even more frustrating is I think we could fix it. | A national regulation for DC light sockets would fix it. | Mandate a voltage, shape, and max amperage and BAM, | you'll get 1000 different manufactures making standard | compliant bulbs and home power supplies that will last an | eternity. | petra wrote: | Would this system need new electrical wiring ? | wlesieutre wrote: | Yes. For the commercial DC lighting installations I've | seen they were using power over ethernet. That's not | necessarily the only way to deliver DC power but whatever | you do it's going to be wired differently from 120 VAC. | samtho wrote: | I used to do electrical installs in commercial buildings | and this was starting to catch on, mainly because the the | practice of running ethernet (including the 8P8C aka RJ45 | connector, patch paneling, etc) is already established. | This always felt very roundabout and requires expensive | networking equipment just to run lights which I do not | personally like because it will just cause confusion. | xxpor wrote: | You also get (the wiring for) remote control for free | though, which is nice. | | It seems like there would be a market for cheap as | possible 10 mbit switches with 802.3bt/802.3af support | though. | | https://www.amazon.com/Gigabit-802-3af-100Mbps-250Meter- | Unma... is pretty cheap as is, I'm sure you could buy | something in bulk for cheaper. | bryanlarsen wrote: | We've had 2 standard DC outlets for a while now: 12V | cigarette lighter and 5V USB. You do often see them in | odd places. But the voltage and wattage of those specs is | too low to be useful, so they haven't evolved into DC | power distribution. | | USB-C PD is at a useful voltage & wattage level, and so | is Ethernet POE. I wouldn't be surprised to see them | start to be used for general power distribution in niche | applications, like RV's and off-grid cabins. | | I don't think we're going to ever get a bulb standard, | though. | zaroth wrote: | Cars are starting to move to 48V DC. My under cabinet | lighting in the kitchen are powered by DC from a power | supply in the basement. | | I could definitely see this becoming more common. | Powering the ~100 watts of fixed lighting spread across | my whole house on ten different 15A 120v circuits, each | with their own arcfault breaker and 12 gauge copper | electrical lines running back to the panel is | _fabulously_ expensive for what could be done with a | bunch of CAT5 in each floor running to some conveniently | located "POE injector" type devices. | | You would want to be able to take a standard fixture and | just push DC through it and use special bulbs with a | standard A19 base, but that's problematic when the next | owner tries to screw in a standard bulb - what happens | when it sees 48V DC? | | I would guess if for safety reasons it has to be a | non-A19 connector, then your light fixture choices get | cut down to almost nothing and no one will make the | switch? | | It's really interesting to think about, most everything | I'm plugging into AC outlets in my house, the first step | is converting it to DC. A lot of my outlets I've switched | to include USB ports so I don't need the wall warts. If | you have solar and battery backup even more-so you start | to question why we are wasting so much money moving | everything back and forth between DC/AC/DC within a | house. | garaetjjte wrote: | >screw in a standard bulb - what happens when it sees 48V | DC? | | Either it lights up or not? I don't see a problem here. | | But I'm not sure moving part of power supply elsewhere | will help that much, it needs current driver electronics | anyway. | pwg wrote: | > but that's problematic when the next owner tries to | screw in a standard bulb - what happens when it sees 48V | DC? | | If by "standard" you mean a incandescent tungsten | filament bulb, nothing at all. | | For a true LED driver power supply, it would be constant | current, so the tungsten filament would see 25mA (or | whatever the constant current is set for) of DC, and | nothing bad would happen (the filament also would not | likely illuminate either). | | Screwing in an LED bulb with integrated power supply, the | external supply will still feed the constant current | value, so what happens depends upon the design of the LED | bulb's integrated power supply. If 25mA is enough to | drive everything, the LED bulb might light up. If 25mA is | not enough to drive everything, most likely nothing | lights up. | Dylan16807 wrote: | 48V without a current limit shouldn't be _nothing_ , but | you should expect less than 10% brightness. | | For constant current, you'd need to drive at least 9 | watts so it would be more like 250mA if not higher. | | A 1600 lumen LED module might take as much or more | current than a 60w incandescent. If your constant current | supply can output between 0 volts and input volts, and | it's set for a bulb with such a module, it would be able | to power an incandescent bulb. | Zak wrote: | Trying to cram all the infrastructure for an LED lamp | into the shape of a light bulb is a bad idea, even if the | input power is DC. Good designs for LED lighting have | larger surface areas for heat dissipation and some | physical/thermal separation between the LEDs and the | power supply. A quality power supply does not produce | flicker. As other comments have noted, dimming, or even | predictable output requires some sort of power regulation | even with DC input. | | I think the way to change it is to replace sockets with | hardwired LED fixtures. This is easy for something like a | standalone ceiling light. It may be harder for other | devices like ceiling fans that integrate a light bulb | socket, but converting those devices to take DC power as | in your proposal isn't easy either (most would just get | discarded and replaced). | | Doing it well is more expensive in the short-term than | screw-in bulbs. A quick look on Amazon suggests | integrated ceiling lights are about 10x the price of LED | bulbs, though I suspect the longer service life pays for | itself. | Joker_vD wrote: | > Trying to cram all the infrastructure for an LED lamp | into the shape of a light bulb is a bad idea, even if the | input power is DC. | | Absolutely, the incandescent light bulbs have that shape | for a reason: the screw is small because there is nothing | to put in it and it doesn't heat, the bulb is large to | dissipate all the light and heat it generates. And the | LED light bulbs have _exactly_ opposite problems: almost | all of the heat is generated near the screw while the | bulb itself generates almost none and the light-emitter | doesn 't even need the bulb that large around of it. Oh, | and the casing around the screw is plastic so the thermal | conductivity is horrible. Honestly, it's a profoundly | terrible form-factor which we're now stuck with. | dredmorbius wrote: | There _are_ finned LED bulbs which can fit standard | Edison Screw sockets, e.g.: | | <https://www.designboom.com/technology/self- | cooling-100-watt-...> | | <https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b5/c2/c5/b5c2c5d69fb240a5 | 71ba...> | | It's also helpful to recognise that _existing_ lighting | fixtures and lamps were designed around the constraints | of incandescent bulbs. The first generation of LED bulbs | and lamps _largely_ conform to these. As LEDs mature, | both fixtures and lamps which address the limitations and | requirements of the technology (transformers, perhaps | dedicated 12v circuits, heat dissipation for the | transformer rather than lighting elements themselves, and | better light-temperature and intensity regulation) | _should_ emerge. | | We're presently in the somewhat-messy half-emerged state. | Think horseless carriages, wireless, and the days of dual | gas/electric lighting and lamping systems (yes, these | existed, and yes, the failure modes were ... much as you | might imagine). | amluto wrote: | I sure hope 12V doesn't happen. 12V is absurdly low for | lighting and needs extremely thick wires to get decent | efficiency. | | 24V is okay. 48V would be nicer for indoor use. | robocat wrote: | > needs extremely thick wires | | Not extremely thick. Wire losses remain similar at 12V as | they were at 110V (Replace 100W bulb with a 10W bulb at | 12V, current remains ~1A so wire losses stay the same as | the were). Wire losses might be say 1W for 1mm2 cabling. | 240V example: https://ausinet.com.au/voltage-drop/ | | Agree that it is worth upping voltage to chase a few more | percent savings, but still need to consider other | constraints. | brianwawok wrote: | Wiring up a house with 48V for lights and 120V for plugs | would be such a pain. Pulling 2 different wires to every | room. Weird circuit breakers. Yuck. | robocat wrote: | Already happens in New Zealand: lighting is usually low | current 1mm2 wiring, and everything else is heavier | gauge. Circuit breakers mostly care about Amps (all | breakers could be rated to mains voltage if you wanted to | avoid "weird"). | | Also low voltage wiring can legally be done by anyone in | NZ (a bonus when doing your own work, and a pitfall when | buying a house?) | Turskarama wrote: | A lot of countries already have lighting on a separate | circuit. It means that when something trips a breaker you | don't lose all your lights as well. | Zak wrote: | I don't think we're exactly _stuck_ with the old form | factor. We can start phasing them out. Replacement of | screw sockets with modern fixtures is well within the | capabilities of the average DIYer (though perhaps some | places it 's illegal for anyone but a professional | electrician to touch anything hardwired). | Joker_vD wrote: | Well, one of the main sales point of the LED bulbs was | compatibility with existing E14/E27/etc sockets: no need | to change the wiring, or the fixtures, just buy a new, | better light bulb and screw it right in! It will also | serve longer and be better for the environment, what's | not to like? We'll even ban the sales of 100W and higher | incandescent light bulbs to help you make the right | choice! | | That's also the pitch of the smart bulbs: a sane way | would be to make a smart light switch but what if you | can't do that (e.g., you rent the apartment)? So we'll | shove the controller chip into a disposable light bulb, | that's still perfectly fine for the environment. | | By the way, I don't know how things turned out in your | part of the world but over here, after the ban went into | the force the manufacturers of incandescent lightbulb | started selling 95W light bulbs 8D | petrocrat wrote: | Probably going to sound crazy, but we could start running | water pipes in front of the walls and under the ceilings | and mounting the LED's directly on the pipes for cooling. | Creativity, thinking wholistically... the entire | contemporary western house design needs a rethink | frankly, from DC circuits to electrification to modular, | mass-produceable utility drop-in pods, all with an eye | towards integrated systems design paired with scalable | modularity. | Thrymr wrote: | We _could_ even have standard DC bulbs for lamps with | built-in standard power supplies, but they don't really | exist. | samtho wrote: | I am designing an off-grid cabin with a solar panel array | charging a bank of batteries with a propane generator | backup. I run ethernet as power with a custom designed | PCB that terminates at the outlet side where it exposes a | 20 watt USB charging port and an ethernet port. | | The lights are all basically cut 12v light strips inside | of old light fixtures with a custom controller that also | terminates PoE. The 48 volts that most PoE standards | specify is more than enough to push power down the line | for < 100 meter runs. | | The advantage of PoE here is that anything under 50 volts | is considered low voltage and does not need to follow the | same rules as normal house wiring. I did not like that | everything is hinging upon a beefy PoE switch so I | actually made it passive PoE instead by design. | int0x2e wrote: | If you're willing to share your design, I'm sure there | are other folks like myself who think this is a cool | idea. I've wanted to do PoE (or passive PoE) for lights | for a while now... | samtho wrote: | I am going to open source it. The goal was to be able to | get all the SMD stuff available at JLPCB so you can just | send it to be fabbed (with some thru-hole components you | would just solder yourself) or I would also sell them at | cost + 10%. My brother designed some 802.3at chips and | was going to have him review my work first as I don't | want to send out into the world a poorly design power | system (there are enough of those things out there | unfortunately). | amluto wrote: | I think this falls apart in the details. LEDs want | constant current power supplies, and their owners | frequently want them to dim. So you will still need a | power supply. | | You can fudge it with resisters like in an LED strip, but | you lose efficiency and dimming quality. | | That being said, I expect that power supplies with 48VDC | input or so would be cheaper. | BizarroLand wrote: | Maybe this could be a prosumer retrofit thing, where the | AC voltage gets converted to DC in the junction box, and | then DC is sent down to the fixture. | | Probably with some sort of current sensing system to make | it compatible with dimmers. | | Pair that with DC A19 LED bulbs that have no internal | power systems. | | Probably expensive to put together and to install, but if | the goal was to have LEDs that last longer, that would do | it. | xxs wrote: | You will see need to current drive the LEDs, DC alone | won't help. | HideousKojima wrote: | >Maybe this could be a prosumer retrofit thing, where the | AC voltage gets converted to DC in the junction box, and | then DC is sent down to the fixture. | | The problem is that in 99.99% of homes outlets are on the | same circuits as light fixtures, you would need to do | some major rewiring. | BizarroLand wrote: | No, I'm saying you put a module into the junction box | that the light fixture is attached to that serves as an | AC/DC adapter, current limiting driver, and possibly a | dimming sensor that would then provide downstream DC | voltage to retrofit A19 bulbs. | | Those bulbs would then have no internal switching systems | to burn out and rely entirely on the module hidden behind | the wall to handle their power needs. | JohnFen wrote: | Low voltage DC lighting is a thing that has existed for a | very, very long time. That most houses don't have it is | more cultural than anything else, in my opinion. | | That means it's totally fixable. You can install such a | system in existing buildings right now, and it's not | crazy expensive unless you want to run the wires inside | the walls. | | If we could shift cultural expectations around this, | adding a LV system in new construction would not | significantly increase the construction costs. It will | start to be done if buyers start demanding it. | xxs wrote: | 12V requires quite a lot of amps for enough light, so low | DC is not optimal. Also LEDs are current driven devices, | i.e. they will be sensitive to voltage changes (even with | a current limiting resistor) | JohnFen wrote: | Low-voltage doesn't necessarily mean 12V. I think it's | anything below about 50, although lighting systems | currently marketed as "low voltage" are usually 12 or 24 | volts. | | The constant current thing is true, but that's not a | terribly difficult problem. | Dylan16807 wrote: | It's complicated. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_voltage | | Depending on who you ask, the limit for low voltage DC | might be 42 or 50 or maybe 60 or 120 or _1500_. | yencabulator wrote: | For example: the stairwell shin-height lights in this 90s | house are 12 VDC. There's a transformer plugged into a | wall outlet in the nearby storage closet. | coryrc wrote: | LEDs must be powered by a constant-current supply, and | distribution does not work well at constant-current, and | is always constant voltage. So no matter what you will | need some sort of switching power supply. | | LEDs are like 15% efficient and power supplies are >95%. | They just need to be separated slightly so the LEDs | aren't heating the power supply. Most recessed LED | lighting now has a separate junction box with the power | supply. | samtho wrote: | > LEDs must be powered by a constant-current supply, and | distribution does not work well at constant-current, and | is always constant voltage. So no matter what you will | need some sort of switching power supply. | | I think the biggest problem is that many cheap power | supplies cycle at lower frequencies that cause flickering | which is perceptible subconsciously. A modern switchmode | power supply might operate in the 50-500khz range which | will not cause perceivable flickers. | int0x2e wrote: | The really cheap stuff actually doesn't even have a power | supply! There's a breed of LEDs that takes straight AC | and rectifies it using the LEDs themselves. By using a | large number of tiny LEDs in series (typically in COB | form), you can easily reach close to 110v or even 220v, | and then you add a small current limiting controller in | series that's dirt cheap compared to magnetics... These | are super cheap, and appear bright, but they flicker at | 120hz, which can be annoying when there's motion or if | you're sensitive to it. | | I'd say it's a very bad choice for a bedroom or living | room light, but I have nothing against it for the outdoor | lights, signage and a bunch of other applications where | cost is king. | Sunspark wrote: | Branding matters. If your brand is a light that flickers, | you might want to consider the old adage penny wise, | pound foolish. As a consumer, why would I choose to shop | at an establishment that has flickering lights when I | could shop at a different one that did not? Unless of | course, I had no choice. | | But then, a wise entrepreneur would recognize paying | extra to have non-flickering signage would attract some | customers. | | Flickering lights can induce migraines in susceptible | people, so literally, saving a penny here actively drives | away business. | amluto wrote: | I have a serious problem with it for outdoor lighting and | signage: it gives me a headache. Enough exposure will | make me feel actively sick. The effect is not subtle. | | Just don't use these devices, please. | droopyEyelids wrote: | You're right though I want to mention the LEDs are also | damaged by the heat, their color temperature will wander, | lifetime will be reduced, and brightness per watt will | also be reduced. Still useful for projects and areas | where perfect lighting isn't as important. | JohnFen wrote: | Indeed. And, as another commenter pointed out, LED bulbs | often overdrive the LEDs in order to maximize light | output -- but doing so significantly decreases the | lifespan of the LEDs themselves. | blisterpeanuts wrote: | >> I harvest the LEDs out of dead bulbs to use in hobby | projects. | | This is a great idea and I would love it if you would | post a Youtube how-to video. It might encourage a bunch | of hobbyists to do something useful with those dead | bulbs. | | I've had a number of LED's fail after only a year or two, | in fact more quickly than the average incandescent bulb. | Seems like it defeats the whole purpose of "upgrading" | and in fact may be more of a downgrade. | JohnFen wrote: | The LEDs are surface mount (although big surface mount | components, so not particularly difficult to work with). | I desolder them with hot air (although you can totally do | it with a soldering iron), then use them later as any | other surface mount LED. I don't have access to YouTube | right now, so can't search for you, but there are tons of | videos covering how to desolder and solder surface mount | components. I'd be willing to bet there are multiple | videos covering this for LEDs specifically, too. | xxs wrote: | LEDs tend to be mounted on heat sinks, so de-soldering | sort of sucks. | JohnFen wrote: | Yeah, it's not as easy as if they were mounted on a | normal PCB, but it's not really all that bad (using hot | air, anyway). | xxs wrote: | Actually it's a terrible idea - those LEDs have been | overdriven to hell and back, their luminosity and overall | lifetime decreased. | | LEDs are super cheap. I bought few hundred pre-covid for | $3. | JohnFen wrote: | Whether or not using them is a good idea depends on what | you're using them for. I tend to use them for projects | where none of that really matters. | | LEDs are indeed extremely cheap, but for me, the benefit | is reducing the amount of electronic waste I produce, not | cost-savings. | smolder wrote: | They're remarkably heat sensitive, especially cheap ones. | Some bulbs would gladly run for 10 years in a room | slightly above freezing temperature, but put them in a | semi-enclosed fixture in a normal living space, and | they're dead in a few months. Fully enclosed fixtures | destroy them in no time, unless you buy really exotic | bulbs with truly massive aluminum heatsinks, rated for | high temp operating environments. I can't even find | domestic suppliers for those, and had to order from | China. | xxs wrote: | >Almost all LED bulb failures are because the power | supply died due to overheating, not the LEDs themselves. | | I have the exact opposite experience, virtually every | single light bulb I have torn down - one LED (all in | series) has a black dot, if I shorten it - it will 'work' | again. The bulbs I have seen tend to drive the LEDs so | hard that some of the latter fail, power supplies might | have huge ripple but generally don't fail | catastrophically. | | Edit: now thinking, it can be a US thing, with the | voltage being ~120. Lower AC voltages means worse | efficiency for the power supply (and all of them tend to | be universal, unless totally cheapen out on the primary | capacitor [250V] for the US market). Generally speaking | low AC voltages have mostly disadvantages. | JohnFen wrote: | It could very well be more of a US problem. In the bulbs | that I've torn down, they all have used a capacitive | dropper power supply, and it's usually been the capacitor | that failed. | | I have had lamps that lived long enough to see LED | failures (the "black dot of death") but that's not the | most usual failure mode that I've personally encountered. | | I've been considering following in the footsteps of Big | Clive and modifying new LED bulbs to stop them from | overdriving the LEDs, but my interest in doing that | hasn't yet overcome my inherent laziness. | titzer wrote: | Your comment is just regurgitating tech specs. In reality, | the bulbs that are at hand vary so much in quality, that tech | spec discussions are almost useless. The flickering is a real | issue. I'm not aware of any standard way of rating the | flickering of LED bulbs; they can vary from really bad | (literally dark 50% of the duty cycle because one stupid | diode) to decent (bidirectional diodes), to very good (full | voltage regulator). | amluto wrote: | It's not, though. | | First, this driver actually specifies flicker, and it has a | credible number. Second, I own several and have tested | them. Performance is excellent. It dims well, too. If you | want a _crappy_ driver, you don't need to spend $25 for it | :) | | Second, this LED chip is a serious one, with a serious data | sheet, intended for people building their own fixtures. | oh_sigh wrote: | Where exactly would you mount a light like the one you | linked? | | 10 hours per day sounds like a crazy amount of time to use a | light. I think we use some lights in our house maybe 4 hours | per day on average max. Maybe I just have a lot of windows | and don't live in Alaska in the winter. | bbarnett wrote: | _10 hours per day sounds like a crazy amount of time to use | a light._ | | I think the Alaska point is close. Yet even in (for | example) southern Canada, the sun just doesn't get high | over the horizon in winter. So you have 7 hour days, but | those days are mostly dim and dark. | | Even without clouds. | beebeepka wrote: | Sounds depressing. That's how I feel when days are like | that | fzzzy wrote: | It is. | amanaplanacanal wrote: | I'm in Oregon, just about on the 45th parallel. Not | nearly as far north as some people, but winters can be | pretty hard light-wise, and SAD is a bitch. I really | should move to Arizona or Mexico in the winter. | | On the other hand, summers are spectacular. | amluto wrote: | On a nice piece of thick metal, with heat sink compound, | aimed at a reflector or diffuser? | bbarnett wrote: | https://www.hydroquebec.com/data/documents- | donnees/pdf/annua... | | Sadly, with San Fran anywhere from 4.5x, or more than where I | live (Quebec), and with LED products lastly barely longer | than incandescent bulbs, it is typically a loss. | | Maybe a 5 year warranty on LED bulbs should be a law, to | ensure better quality control and build. The competitors can | compete around that requirement. | charrondev wrote: | To be fair in Quebec we have what is probably the cheapest | electricity cost in all of North America. | | I've had the dimmable coloured hue bulbs for a while and | while expensive I can say none have ever died on me in ~5 | years. Certainly no flickering. | megous wrote: | Heatsink costs? | amluto wrote: | https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/led-thermal- | produ... | | A whole fixture with nice components like this is not | cheap. | ljf wrote: | I would agree - BUT try 'Edison style' warm leds - these use | the filament style. | | They last for YEARS, and give a soft warm light - the bulbs I | have a dim (but then 'Edison style squirrel cage bulbs have | always been dim). | thrdbndndn wrote: | > LED emitters driven hard for cost reasons | | > Power supplies driven hard for cost reasons | | Can you elaborate? What does "hard" mean here, I don't | understand. | dboreham wrote: | Placed under operating conditions very close to their | specified limits. | | Like if you were to drive your car in 2nd gear on the | freeway, at 6000rpm. The engine would wear out much quicker | than if you drove in 5th gear, at 1500rpm. | elzbardico wrote: | In most cases, they are run too hot with barely adequate heat | dissipation. | userbinator wrote: | At the limits of their ratings. They _could_ make LED bulbs | last many orders of magnitude longer and be more efficient, | but they don 't (unless forced to[1]) because they prefer | planned obsolescence. | | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27093793 | organsnyder wrote: | I've been installing Kauf brand smart-bulbs, which come | pre-flashed with ESPHome for integration with Home | Assistant. Some of my earlier bulbs failed, and I recently | noticed that the founder of the company commented on the | issue and said he specced a more robust capacitor after | early failures: https://github.com/KaufHA/kauf-rgbww- | bulbs/issues/31#issueco... | | I haven't contacted them for replacements yet, but seeing | their comment makes me much more likely to purchase them in | the future, despite my early issues. | meepmorp wrote: | Thanks! Having flashed esphome to smartbulbs the hard | way, ootb support sounds lovely. | organsnyder wrote: | Aside from the quality issues with that first batch, | they've been great. | somehnguy wrote: | Thank you for making me aware those exist. I have a mix | of Hue & cheap Walmart color wifi bulbs. The Hue bulbs | are undoubtedly much high quality (in both output & | reliability) but you pay for it. The Walmart ones are 1/5 | the cost, but very hit & miss on whether you can easily | flash tasmota/esphome - and there is no way of knowing | until you try because of newer firmwares being shipped in | the same packaging. | jsheard wrote: | More recently Philips has started selling the Dubai-style | bulbs worldwide, branded as the "Ultra Efficient" range. | They're expensive though, as you'd expect. | swimfar wrote: | Are you sure those are the same bulbs? The ultra | efficient versions sold on Amazon have reviews going back | to 2017. Supposedly the Dubai-style bulbs were only | available in Dubai even a few years ago. | jsheard wrote: | The Ultra Efficient series only just launched in | November: https://www.signify.com/en-gb/our- | company/news/press-release... | | There must be some kind of listing error on Amazon, maybe | an old listing being repurposed without clearing the old | reviews. | userbinator wrote: | I believe BigClive did a video on those, and while they | did indeed use more LEDs for improved efficiency, they | also had a more complex and thus failure-prone driver | than the original Dubai ones. | | In other words, more efficient, but not longer lifespan. | ghaff wrote: | Or because, as with many products and services, many people | go into Home Depot or wherever and buy whatever is cheapest | --especially in a world where higher price does not | necessarily equate to higher quality or longer life. | Cthulhu_ wrote: | > especially in a world where higher price does not | necessarily equate to higher quality or longer life. | | There's the kicker; how can you tell when something is | better quality anymore? Qualifiers like "is this device | run at max capacity or is there leeway" are never listed | on packaging or product features. | ghaff wrote: | It's often hard to know, especially for items you're not | going to individually research in great depth, whether | you're actually paying for quality or for a name on the | package even though it actually came off the same | assembly line in China as any number of knock-offs. And, | even if it is higher quality by some standard, does that | really affect consumer outcomes? | DoneWithAllThat wrote: | I do not, nor will I ever, excuse penny-pinching by | companies by agreeing that they're forced to do it | because people will always buy the cheapest thing they | can. It's trotted out as the lame excuse for bag check | fees and other declining flying services, cheap consumer | goods, cheap electronics, you name it. | | To accept the premise is to believe that anything made of | quality will never get bought/used which is manifestly | not the case. And it strangely completely ignores the | incentives companies have to make things as shitty as | possible, namely lower expenses and planned obsolescence. | JasonFruit wrote: | The problem is evaluating quality before purchase. | There's not a great way of expressing the sorts of | factors that differentiate between good and bad LED bulbs | that consumers can easily understand, let alone anything | to encourage different manufacturers to use the same | measurements. If the consumer can't tell what is quality, | what's to get them to spend the money for it? | lotsofpulp wrote: | >To accept the premise is to believe that anything made | of quality will never get bought/used which is manifestly | not the case. | | I disagree. It is a ratio of quality to price. People | have different opinions about what the acceptable minimum | ratio is, and it varies by product, and by time. For | example, many people find Costco to hit the right ratio | most of the time. | | For example, I have been using LEDs and dimmable LEDs | from soft white (~2700K) to cool white (~4000K) with no | problem, all purchased at Home Depot/Lowes/Costco. Some | have failed earlier than anticipated, but nowhere near | enough to cancel out the cost savings. | ghaff wrote: | And it's a matter of individual consumer priorities. | | Some consumers will happily pay for business class | seating on planes. Others will generally overlook | inconvenience and less comfort if they can save $50. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Yes, another example is clothing. I have no interest in | buying high quality clothing that I have to spend time | taking care of. I want whatever lasts longest, while | still being able to throw in the washer and dryer on | default settings without having to separate colors. | [deleted] | Spooky23 wrote: | 100 years of training make most people think of light bulbs | as a trivial purchase. And now a product that cost $0.50 20 | years ago is $10, and often performs worse for its purpose. | | So the economics just drive cost down no matter what. And | even a picky consumer is hard pressed to get what he wants | when you go to the bulb aisle at Lowe's. They literally went | from 10 SKUs to 250, with no meaningful standards. | paulrpotts wrote: | This is my biggest barrier to finding decent bulbs. The | search engines on sites like homedepot.com offer very | little help, especially since they always show promoted | items higher in the results, even if they don't match any | keywords I put in my search. Then, if I do find what looks | like the right thing, they're invariably out of stock | everywhere. | VLM wrote: | The e-waste issues of having to replace entire LED units every | two to three years are worse than replacing an old fashioned | bulb every decade. | sparker72678 wrote: | Agreed the e-waste issues are real, but how did you get | incandescents to last 10 years? I replaced every dang one | after 12 months or less, every time. | Majromax wrote: | > how did you get incandescents to last 10 years? | | As a general answer, dimming. Incandescent bulbs are | fantastically sensitive to applied voltage; Wikipedia's | article on the subject | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamp_rerating) notes that | bulb lifespan is inversely proportional to the applied | voltage to the fourteenth power or so. | | In an ordinary home you can't directly reduce the supply | voltage, but dimming a higher-rated bulb will get you | somewhere in the ballpark through a reduction in the duty | cycle. | | However, this comes at the expense of luminous efficiency. | Reducing the applied electrical power reduces the filament | temperature, and the black-body spectrum of a lower- | temperature filament has proportionally more output in the | infrared region. | sparker72678 wrote: | Gotcha, thanks! | golem14 wrote: | Putting them on a dimmer and running at 90% hugely | increases lifetime | knodi123 wrote: | my grandma's incandescent nightlight has lasted 35 years | and counting. (it's a special bulb, and runs at a very low | wattage- perhaps under-spec?) | hedora wrote: | I didn't hit many of these issues (our house has 100% LED | bulbs, from different manufacturers). | | I made sure they were all the same color temperature, and also | all >> 90 CRI. | | The main issue I've seen is that dimmer switches are usually | not compatible with the electronics in high-end fixtures, and | that high-end fixtures often take a long time to power on. | (Like, walk across the room and open the fridge amounts of | time.) | | They should choose a standard way of dimming bulbs that doesn't | result in noticeable 60hz flicker, and that dictates a max | 100ms turn on latency, then ban the sale of "dimmer compatible" | LED bulbs, or "LED compatible" dimmer switches that are not | compliant with that standard. | | Also, bulb reliability should be tracked, and any product with | a > 5% failure rate in the first 5 years should either be | banned, or the company should have to put replacement funds | into escrow. | | (Current bulbs have a ~ 5-10% failure rate from what I've | seen.) | zxcvbn4038 wrote: | There are YouTube channels dedicated to repairing non- | functional LED bulbs. In every case the issue is usually that | one of n leds has failed, and if you solder a bypass then the | remaining leds work fine. After that the only real problem is | that all the adhesives used in the construction of the bulb | more or less require that you destroy the bulb in order to get | to the point you can repair or bypass the one LED. | jjoonathan wrote: | How much of this is driven by the actual cost of properly | provisioning emitters and fielding a good power supply vs the | inability of consumers to hold manufacturers accountable? | mleo wrote: | Does the average person remember the brand of lightbulb they | purchased at Walmart or the hardware store? I would hope the | buyers at stores would have better sense to buy half decent | brand vs utter trash available through 3rd party sellers | online. Not much hope though. | reaperman wrote: | What is "SSRI" in the context of LEDs? | toby- wrote: | I believe they meant SSI, which is Spectral Similarity Index. | | https://www.oscars.org/science- | technology/projects/spectral-... | Dave_Rosenthal wrote: | A misspelling of "SSI", Spectral Similarity Index, another | color accuracy metric. | | Basically the industry figured out how to win at the CRI game | without actually creating the same underlying spectral | distribution of light. So they same up with another metric to | try to optimize called SSI (also TLCI, etc.) SSI is mostly | relevant in the digital cinema space, where the observer is a | digital camera, not a human eye, as they can't be tricked the | same way because they have different underlying RGB spectral | sensitivities. | carride wrote: | Primarily it is the E27 bulbs that are the problem. Designed to | ease people into simple replacement into the old light sockets | 10+ years ago. Now in 2023 the new LED products with the well | designed power supplies work much better and efficiency. The | author mentions renovations, but still using ancient fixtures, | wiring and switches. A new house, or partial renovation, should | now be wired with 24v for all wall and ceiling lights. | gorkish wrote: | > The same light quality is vastly more expensive to achieve | with LEDs, even if you account for high electricity prices. | Good indoor lighting is now something only people with plenty | of disposable income can afford. | | Where? How? I can no longer buy quality LED lighting at any | price. I have a bunch of Sylvania Ultra Sunset Effects bulbs | purchased ~15 years or so ago that nothing since even comes | close to. | aardvarkr wrote: | What's an example of what you consider to be a high quality | led? I'm pretty happy with everything that I have in my home | but I'm curious what you're talking about | doitLP wrote: | Check out https://www.waveformlighting.com/ for some very | high quality LEDs and education about how they work. | ghostpepper wrote: | I was about to order some of these when I realized their | only shipping option to Canada is $70 CAD. Almost much | doubles the price of a six-pack. | _rs wrote: | Sadly they don't sell dimmable bulbs (at least that meet my | criteria: 2700-3000K, 60W equiv / ~800 lumens) | brodouevencode wrote: | I can't imagine paying $150 for a six pack, when Home | Depot's private label LEDs are $12 for a six pack. I could | replace it 10 times before I hit that mark - not sure it's | worth that. | basch wrote: | that doesnt really fix the flickering problem. | brodouevencode wrote: | I had one room that had a flicker problem. Replaced the | fixture (was going to do this anyway because The Wife | Said So) and it went away. I guess that's why some of the | complaints seem foreign to me. | Kalium wrote: | A lot of people, including this article, blame flickering | on bulbs. Usually because introducing an LED bulb is what | shows the issue. | | That the underlying issue might be the fixture, or in the | older electrical system, is not always an intuitive jump. | jdcarter wrote: | I bought many of the Home Depot private label LEDs...and | had to replace every single one of them. Outright | failure, buzzing, flickering. They're just terrible. I've | replaced them with Philips. | Arubis wrote: | If you told me you could make one room of my house | consistently color-balanced with LED lighting that I | would have no reason to hate, I would ball up a couple | hundred dollar bills and throw them at you. | | (Edit: I'm also coming from buying Philips Hue bulbs for | precisely this reason, so in fairness, it's not as big a | price jump.) | brodouevencode wrote: | I have a few Hues and they are great, and last much | longer. But in this house I cannot justify even that. In | my kitchen/breakfast nook alone I have 10 lightbulbs plus | an overhead flushmount. | bbarnett wrote: | Makes me think of this | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X-ZVOYwNLU | doitLP wrote: | Keep in mind: all LEDs leak blue light even the warm ones | (color is achieved by average so you can have high red | and high blue and it looks balanced visually). These | bright blue leaking LEDs are great during the day -- | especially those with high CRI and R9 values. But not at | night when you're trying to go to bed! Switch to | incandescent only in the evenings until they figure out | blue-less dimmable LEDs | rini17 wrote: | Not all, only white LEDs. You can use any cheap LED RGB | strip without white components and set it to | yellow/orange light with blue completely off. It has poor | CRI though. | knodi123 wrote: | > ball up a couple hundred dollar bills and throw them at | you | | this is why more and more businesses only accept cards. | :-P | lacrosse_tannin wrote: | incandescent bulbs used to cost like $0.60 each | zippergz wrote: | And this is the exact reason that the market for good | quality LEDs is so small. You care about price but not | light quality (primarily CRI but also flicker and | dimmability). That's fine, it's totally your decision to | make. But the two products are incredibly far from | equivalent. | Spooky23 wrote: | I can't imagine sitting in a room with the color | temperature of a gas station bathroom with random | flickering and fading out every couple of years. | reaperman wrote: | They have several different warm LED's at Home Depot. You | can generally find 2100K to 3000K. Sometimes even 1800K | in the specialty bulbs there. | | They're not terrible, but the low CRI keeps me coming | back to halogen. | brodouevencode wrote: | I have those HD bulbs. They are nowhere near as bad as | what you just described. | roughly wrote: | I hear you, but I bought two waveforms just to try them | out, and they're absolutely incredible. It's a shockingly | better light than the $2 home depot light. It's the | equivalent of going from an underpowered computer to one | that's up to the job - you don't really notice how bad | the old one was until you get something up to the task. | electroly wrote: | I recently replaced all my bulbs with Waveform Lighting | bulbs. They're good but IMO overrated and overpriced, and | their shipping prices are absurd. You can get high-CRI | bulbs at Home Depot, it's just a matter of trying a couple | until you find one that doesn't flicker (use your phone's | slow motion camera) if you don't want to go the route of | specialty bulbs. My Cree bulbs all flickered but my Philips | bulbs did not; to my eye, there's no difference between the | cheaper Philips bulbs and the much more expensive Waveform | Lighting bulbs. | | One of my Waveform Lighting bulbs arrived defective, and it | flickers all the time. I couldn't detect the Cree flicker | with the naked eye but the defective Waveform bulb flickers | visibly. Not sure if Waveform's QA is up to snuff. | reaperman wrote: | In contrast to the other child comment of this... Thank | You!! Any additional suggestions for high quality LED's | would be super appreciated. I'm still on mostly halogen | lighting in my home. I keep trying to switch the LED's but | for some reason with my vision, the low CRI of even | "decent" LED bulbs make it so I feel like I can't actually | see anything. | Smrchy wrote: | Check out https://www.occhio.com/en-lv/about-light/light- | quality/outst... for some high end lights... | [deleted] | tourgen wrote: | [dead] | Bloating wrote: | LTF: https://ltftechnology.com/sunlight2-dim-to- | warm-3000k-to-180... | | Ketra was good, smart bulbs like Hue with an open API, but | far better than Hue. Lutron bought them, killed the API and | and proceeded to require inferior and costly priority | controls | justin66 wrote: | Philips' Dubai lamps are really interesting (sorry about the | goofy title on the video) | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klaJqofCsu4 | throw0101b wrote: | > _- Poor CRI and SSRI_ | | So having a minimum CRI of 80-90 is a good starting point, | there are issues with the CRI measure itself: | | > _Ra is the average value of R1-R8; other values from R9 to | R15 are not used in the calculation of Ra, including R9 | "saturated red", R13 "skin color (light)", and R15 "skin color | (medium)", which are all difficult colors to faithfully | reproduce. R9 is a vital index in high-CRI lighting, as many | applications require red lights, such as film and video | lighting, medical lighting, art lighting, etc. However, in the | general CRI (Ra) calculation R9 is not included._ | | * | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_rendering_index#Special_... | | * | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_rendering_index#Criticis... | | There are initiatives to come up with a better metric, but | there doesn't seem to be much traction: | | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_quality_scale | _rs wrote: | > - It is quite difficult to even buy high quality LEDs as a | mere mortal | | I'm going through this again now. At one point I found Philips | EyeComfort bulbs on Amazon which checked all my boxes | (2700-3000K, 60W, dimmable, almost non-existent flicker). I've | had a couple bulbs die on me now, and I cannot for the life of | me find replacements, it's like they stopped manufacturing | them. I have no clue what to replace them with now | xxs wrote: | The same topic about LEDs has so many entries on HN in the | recent years. I have posted about it a lot. To add to the list | - low power factor (usually 50%). - cheap passives, | caps/coils - terrible heat dissipation, e27/e14 are no | good target, but see overdriven again - close to no input | protection (see power supplies, again), so motors totally wreck | them with their induction kickback | | OTOH, constant (not over)driven LEDs with dedicated power | supplies (pref. isolated, so safer), with decent area, aluminum | PCBs can last long. | | A cheap advice if you have to buy a retrofit LED bulb, buy the | heaviest one, i.e. get a scale with (at least) gram precision | and weight them. More mass - better heat dissipation, better | passives. | droopyEyelids wrote: | We're mostly on the same page, but there are some caveats to | buying the heavier bulbs, even assuming the weight is all | heat sink- because that won't matter if the heated air has no | where to go! | | An expensive bulb with a nice heat sink will fail just as | quickly as a cheap one when you put it in a well-sealed can | light or something else that traps all the hot air. | moogly wrote: | To add a thing to the list: RF interference. | | I wanted to upgrade the super faint positional lights in my two | garage openers, and I need to stay <= 10W, so I tried some | LEDs. But they kill the 433 MHz remote signal, sadly. Tried 3 | different brands, a couple of which don't actually fully turn | off, or give off a loud hum to boot. | | The openers use rear car light bulbs, for some reason (BA15s). | roel_v wrote: | "Good indoor lightning" | | Man I'd love me some indoor lightning, no matter the cost. | yjftsjthsd-h wrote: | Tesla coils aren't _that_ expensive; go live your dreams:) | shagie wrote: | Your new stereo system, courtesy ArcAttack - | https://youtu.be/6OdubOdFS-Y (DIY kit from them | https://arcattack.com/kits-accessories/thundermouse-tesla- | co... ) | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singing_Tesla_coil | orangepurple wrote: | Building a fire death machine using soviet military tech | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNisqZOAaAs | jfrej wrote: | You can get it in a bottle. | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-93Ij5WIcok&t=28s | xnx wrote: | Quantity (lumens) is its own type of quality. | sam_goody wrote: | There is also IoT in some of these bulbs, especially the more | expensive ones. | | That there is a huge turn off for me, even if I don't have a | smartphone handy ;) | twawaaay wrote: | As an amateur EE, I have analysed some of LEDs when I wanted to | light up my kitchen counters. I wanted flicker-free LEDs with | high CRI and temperature matching the rest of my apartment. | | I ordered samples of a lot of LEDs and found that almost all of | them are using their parts, especially capacitors, well above | the specs. | | Driving caps at well above their specs, at high temperature, | basically ensures speedy failure. Not only that, but undersized | smoothing capacitor causes visible 100Hz flicker. | | What's even more interesting is at the price point putting | better caps was almost inconsequential to the price of the | product. I have ordered capacitors that should have been there | in the first place and replaced the original ones with the new | ones. Not only LEDs are flicker free now, I suspect they will | be serving me for much longer. | DebtDeflation wrote: | >almost all of them are using their parts, especially | capacitors, well above the specs | | Well, the LEDs themselves will last up to 20 years, so they | have to make something in the bulb fail before that. Can't | have people only buying replacement bulbs every other decade. | blackbear_ wrote: | Not sure why you are being downvoted, when that is exactly | what has happened with incandescent light bulbs one century | ago: | | > How exactly did the cartel pull off this engineering | feat? It wasn't just a matter of making an inferior or | sloppy product; anybody could have done that. But to create | one that reliably failed after an agreed-upon 1,000 hours | took some doing over a number of years. The household | lightbulb in 1924 was already technologically | sophisticated: The light yield was considerable; the | burning time was easily 2,500 hours or more. By striving | for something less, the cartel would systematically reverse | decades of progress. | | https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-great-lightbulb-conspiracy | bombcar wrote: | They've started marking LED bulbs as "not for enclosed | fixtures" which is .... 90% of existing fixtures? | | They overheat and die really fast if used in something that's | not vented/cooled. You need fixtures that fully expose the bulb | so it doesn't burn itself out. | | Amusing that LED bulbs, the energy savers, die from excess | _heat_. | dawnerd wrote: | And if you want enclosed rated bulbs there's not many | choices. The GE ones I picked up flicker like crazy. | bombcar wrote: | I've taken to just replacing fixtures instead of trying to | make bulbs work with existing, though I'm --> <-- this | close to just throwing them all away and going back to | kerosene lanterns and some incandescents. | dawnerd wrote: | That's what I did and the flickering didn't go away. I | don't like the idea of buying fully integrated led | fixtures though. Although I might just cave. | nonethewiser wrote: | Is that because they are "downscaling" (totally made up term, | IDK electronics) the energy coming into them? | bombcar wrote: | Part of it is that but part of it is just heat loss as the | other reply mentioned. | | If you get an LED strip, the power supply itself can become | warm; but even a LED with no voltage changing needed will | warm up. | jeffbee wrote: | It's because despite being far more efficient than | incandescent they are still only about 30% efficient at | producing visible light. The rest is heat, and unlike | incandescent an LED does not want to be hot. The device | must be cooled or it becomes less efficient and wears out | faster. There is no good way to get the heat out of the | front of the device because that's the side you are | supposed to see, so in practice all the heat is removed | from the back, i.e. the part inside the fixture. | | Other solutions to this include using much larger devices, | but that costs proportionally more and has application | issues because people want their light bulbs to act like | either line or point sources, not as areal sources. So most | lights on the market use a single small LED, unless they | are targeted to a buyer demanding high efficiency and long | life, like a city streetlight. | nielsbot wrote: | They're pricier but you can get LED bulbs that have better | color rendering | | For example https://www.soraa.com/products/50-Soraa- | VIVID-A19-(120v).php... | smm11 wrote: | They flicker, they die, and all at a more rapid rate that old | school bulbs, despite the boxes saying they'll run 10 years or | more. Ridiculous. | bofaGuy wrote: | LEDs also cause interference with WiFi and other radio signals. | Found out after putting a LED bulb in my smart garage door | opener.. which immediately went offline. | its-summertime wrote: | Feels like a different world to my experiences: while the cheaper | lights we have are a bit more dim compared to what I'd like, we | also have stupidly bright LED lights installed (really need to do | a clean sweep and get all the sockets onto 1 kind), We also have | dimmable downlights (some of the first LEDs in the house, due to | water damage messing up the prior lights) which are dimmer than | I'd like, but they were bought very early so I find that | reasonable. | | But I really can't think of more than 1 or 2 failures over more | than enough years. | | We still have florescent and incandescent, but I get the most | useful lighting in a room with 5 LED lights and nothing else (and | most of the time its actually kinda painful with how bright they | are!) | | If I cared much about the flicker, I'd get a | https://www.crowdsupply.com/test-equipment?sort=latest OpticSpy | or Labrador, or something cheaper, and just go into a store with | a light display and check each one. | | - - - | | > Apple's software will convert the image according to what it | has machine-learned that white ought to be | | My old lexam camera apparently has machine learning built in too? | | Unlike my frustrating old camera, iPhones should be able to lock | the white balance, exposure, et al, right? through which, | comparisons can still be made. | castlecrasher2 wrote: | >But I really can't think of more than 1 or 2 failures over | more than enough years. | | It's bad luck for us. We've had at least 10 bulbs die within | the past two years, at least half of which had been installed | just months before. I'd guess they were a poor quality batch in | the box we bought at Costco. | | Meanwhile, the Philips Hue led lights we bought ages ago are | still working perfectly. | rcarmo wrote: | The piece lost me when it mentioned the LED flaking out with a | dimmer. That's a well-known shortcoming of "average" LED bulbs | (whose drivers cannot cope with the decreased peaks that come | with a standard dimmer). | | Most of it felt like what things would be like if you had | frequent brownouts or just a bad electrical setup. | | [edit]: tried again and stopped when it mentioned painting LED | bulbs in amber varnish. I have RGBW LED strips, getting a | "beautiful" tone is a solved problem. | jacobp100 wrote: | Just some notes on LEDs for anyone having problems with dimmer | switches:- | | - Make sure your dimmer switch is compatible with LEDs - ideally | only compatible with LEDs, as sometimes the ones that also handle | halogen bulbs can buzz | | - Make sure your bulbs are dimmable | | - The LED and dimmer switch need to either both be leading edge, | or both be trailing edge (but almost all are trailing edge now) | | - If your bulbs are too dim, read the manual for your dimmer | switch - there will be a series of pushes and twists to configure | it and/or manufacture reset | | - Lights starting up slower than a normal on/off switch is normal | - it's the bulb and dimmer "negotiating", and it makes them both | last longer | amluto wrote: | > Lights starting up slower than a normal on/off switch is | normal - it's the bulb and dimmer "negotiating", and it makes | them both last longer | | Negotiating? Some dimmers might "adapt" and choose which style | to be (leading or trailing edge), but most don't. I think the | real issue is the startup time of the power supply, especially | when starting dimmed and therefore getting a horrible waveform. | ironmagma wrote: | Watch the level of social disease spike once this becomes | mandatory. | sarusso wrote: | I still can't find decent G4 LED bulbs.. Tried several from | Amazon, they where alle terrible at color rendering (even if | nominal CRI was ok-ish). Any suggestions? | MegaDeKay wrote: | I saw a linked article on that site that gives their LED bulb | recommendations. Brightness, CRI, color temp, and value are all | considered for various applications. | | https://nymag.com/strategist/article/best-led-light-bulbs.ht... | snvzz wrote: | Engineered obsolesce. | Dowwie wrote: | I haven't had an LED bulb that didn't go out within less than a | year of use, not even 300 hours. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | My peeve is with intermediate base bulbs. They forced ceiling | fans to use them but it's nigh impossible to find suitable | dimmable LEDs for them. I had a candelabra adapter short out and | destroy a dimmer so that isn't an option either. | wankle wrote: | https://www.stouchlighting.com/blog/light-comparison-led-lig.... | | "New LEDs can last 50,000 to 100,000 hours or more. The typical | lifespan for an incandescent bulb, by comparison, is 1-5% as long | at best (roughly 1,200 hours)." | | I've never seen more than 15000 hours from an LED bulb at best. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescent_light_bulb | | "The chart below lists values of luminous efficacy and efficiency | for some general service, 120-volt, 1000-hour lifespan | incandescent bulb" | | I spent most of my life in incandescent bulb lighting and rarely | remember changing a light bulb. LED bulbs I can remember changing | multiple times in the last few years since we started using them. | | It's almost like there's a conspiracy to convince consumers | incandescent lighting didn't last long which is odd given the | following: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centennial_Light#:~:text=The%2.... | | "The Centennial Light is the world's longest-lasting light bulb, | burning since 1901, and almost never turned off." | zaroth wrote: | The lifespan on incandescent isn't a conspiracy. Cheap bright | incandescents don't last very long. | | The centennial light was neither cheap or bright - presently | it's about the strength of a 4-watt nightlight. You put enough | power through a thick filament it will glow for a very very | long time, but no one wants to illuminate their house that way! | treffer wrote: | It is not a conspiracy, it was a well known cartel that made | light bulbs horrible: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel | | The 1200h are slightly above the 1000h target put in place by | the cartel. | ClarityJones wrote: | My understanding - which may be wrong - was that long-life | bulbs used more electricity to operate and that the | efficiency gains of a 1,000/hr bulb reduced the overall cost. | | So, making up numbers, a 2,500 hour bulb may cost $5 to | replace and would incur $20 of electricical charges for a | total cost of $25 or 1 Cent/hr. Meanwhile, 1,000 hour bulbs | would cost $10 ($4 * 2.5) while incurring $10 of electrical | charges for a cost $20 or 0.8 Cent/hr... even factoring in | the cost of having to replace the bulbs. | jeroenhd wrote: | It's still happening to LEDs as well. Big brands are over | driving LED chips, degrading their lifespan significantly. | | The story of the Dubai bulbs show that the industry could | easily make bulbs that last (even) longer, but there's no | money in selling products you'll never need to replace. | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | It lasts long because it's not turned off. When an incandescent | bulb turns on the filament shakes violently. | Crusoe123 wrote: | My experience is opposite of yours. I have not yet had to | change an LED light in the last 8-9 years since I started using | them and replacing incandescent ones in my apartment. On the | other hand I remember changing incandescent ones quite often | and using up all the surplus ones I had after I started the | transition to LED. | tomtheelder wrote: | Yeah ~10 years of LED bulbs and I've never replaced one. I've | moved multiple times and brought my bulbs with me. Used to | have a drawer with a bunch of incandescent ones ready to go | because it was a regular occurrence. | bentcorner wrote: | I've seen it go both ways, at least for LEDs. | | My house came with installed LED bulbs that were absolute shit. | Within a year all the can lights eventually would turn a | purpley dim color and slowly all started to fail within the | same time and would fail to turn on. Same thing with the | smaller fixtures - all started to fail around the same time. | | Each time one failed I replaced it with a higher quality LED | and every bulb has now been replaced. Most lights I've only | replaced once and it's been 6-7 years at least for many of them | without any problems. | | Previously I used to use incandescent lights and replacing them | was a frequent occurrence and just an expected thing to | maintain. | jrumbut wrote: | That's funny, I remember going through incandescent bulbs | pretty quickly. I always knew where the extra light bulbs were | in the house and they were a not-uncommon grocery list item. | | It's been a long time since I thought of that. I don't keep | spare bulbs around anymore and can't remember the last time an | LED bulb burnt out. | ghaff wrote: | Yeah. It's not like changing incandescent bulbs was a weekly | occurrence for me but it was certainly not at all a rare | occurrence. | bobbyasdfasdf7 wrote: | [dead] | IshKebab wrote: | You're buying terrible bulbs if you've _never_ seen one last | 15k hours. Just buy some reputable branded bulbs (e.g. | Phillips) rather than no-name cheapo crap from Amazon. | | I can't really remember how long incandescent bulbs lasted, | given that it's been over a decade since anyone in the EU used | them... But good LED bulbs last plenty long enough. | gjsman-1000 wrote: | > I've never seen more than 15000 hours from an LED bulb at | best. | | With the LED bulbs at our home (many of which have failed!), | the problem is always the inverter. They just start flickering | wildly and inconsistently one day, which is never pleasant, and | they need to be replaced. It's frustrating because when the | LEDs have stable power, they can produce just as much | brightness as before, but their integrated power-conversion | circuitry sucks in reliability. | dwighttk wrote: | I wonder if it'd be worth it to centralize the inverter... | wankle wrote: | gjsman-1000's point and yours make sense and somewhere on | the page it was suggested to start running DC power just | for LED lighting in homes. Until then, our new plan is to | use LED light strips and stop buying LED bulbs. The idea is | that the strips have an external power supply so I'm hoping | the LED's will have the lifetime they deserve. | Xeoncross wrote: | This is where the idea meets the real world implementation. | Yes, LED's can last longer, but the additional electrics used | to convert from house-hold AC power can't. | 01100011 wrote: | For me, LED bulbs have a failure curve like any other | electronic device: high level initially and quickly levelling | off to zero. I've probably had... 10% of my bulbs purchased in | the last decade or so go back to the store because they've | either failed or started flickering. Outside of that, I have | zero failures after having the bulb for a month or two. I have | a box of bulbs and some of them are bulbs I bought years ago | and pulled out of my house when I moved, and I've used them at | various apartments since. Still going great. | | Edit: one other thing, I'm also sensitive to the cooling needs | of LEDs, so maybe that helps. At my last apartment, I had the | 'ceiling boob' style built-in fixtures which didn't allow | proper airflow for the LED. I built a little spacer and got a | longer mounting rod to allow a 1/8" gap around the bottom, | central hole and the top edge of the glass. That kept the LEDs | cool and wasn't noticeable. | dashundchen wrote: | I think just like CFLs and incandescents before, quality is going | vary and people will need to stick to a brand that works. I've | had a lot of success with Cree light bulbs. They seem to have | much better light quality than some of the hardware store brands. | | They definitely cost a bit more, but I had one fail 5 years out | and I was able to call Cree up for a replacement. The rep | collected a few questions - model, when it was bought and what | type of room and fixture it was installed - and then sent me a | new one. Despite being a different model, it matched the temp and | tone of the old set of bulbs. | | I empathize with the author, but at the end of the day, a lot of | people seem completely unaware of lighting to begin with. Walk | down a US street at night and look inside, you'll see clashing | warm and cold color temperatures in the same room, sterile cold | bulbs in entryways and living rooms, dreaded boob light | everywhere. | basch wrote: | I have "Is It Snappy?" on my phone, and before I buy any bulbs | or fixtures I check to see how badly they flicker. Walking down | the Home Depot or Menards lighting isle and taking video of | each fixture, there is infinite variation, and not always tied | to price. | | By being conscious and careful, I believe I've managed to have | a pretty flicker free house. Cree has always been my go to non | smart bulb, but I have not purchased any (I guess other than | dimmable cans) since their acquisition. I was not impressed | with their smart ecosystem and returned all of it. The software | wasn't ready and the firmware was glitchy. | | Another thing mentioned not mentioned in the article, is how | bad light looks to pets. Dogs can see the flickering, and with | one previous fixture that is now gone, I noticed the dogs | getting more anxious when the light was on. They didn't like me | moving at them suddenly. I can only imagine how choppy the | light made the world to them. Imagine a world where to everyone | else things look fine, but to you everything is strobing. | | A small link dump of resources I found on hn over the years. | | https://optimizeyourbiology.com/light-bulb-database | | https://www.lutron.com/en-US/Pages/LEDCompatibilityTool/Comp... | | http://www.ledbenchmark.com/ | | http://sle.se/michael/led/ | | https://www.derlichtpeter.de/en/light-flicker/market-tests/ | | http://fastvoice.net/led-testberichte/ | | https://gembared.com/blogs/musings/the-best-daytime-white-li... | | And Light Brands / Shopping | | https://www.yujilighting.com/ | | https://www.waveformlighting.com/ | | https://bedtimebulb.com/ | | https://brightgreen.com/ | | https://www.ledlightexpert.com/ | Brendinooo wrote: | Wanted to give a tentative endorsement to Cree. I bought a box | of LEDs at the hardware store and about a third of them failed | early. I wanted to spend good money on good product; Cree is | well-regarded, and so far (a few months) I've been way happier | with their bulbs than the cheap stuff. | rootusrootus wrote: | Cree has been good to me so far. Haven't actually had one | fail yet, though I've had a few of the lesser brand ones | (Feit, from Costco, mostly) fail. As they go, I replace with | Cree. | stevage wrote: | Strange. I live in Australia, where incandescents were banned | years ago. I have noticed literally none of these supposed | issues. I never see LED lights flickering or making weird colours | or humming or anything. | roflyear wrote: | Incandescent bulbs are used for other things than light. Like | heating sometimes. Specific applications but I wonder if you'll | still be able to get them? | blakesterz wrote: | Someone is, or at least was, doing just this. Selling them as | "heaters": | | https://idle.slashdot.org/story/10/09/27/1351242/selling-inc... | dboreham wrote: | You can still buy the "IR" red light bulbs. Search under | chicken heating. Also there are "non-bulb" things now that fit | into a light bulb socket but are just resistive heaters. Also | search under chicken coop supplies. | gtk40 wrote: | We have a pet tortoise that we use incandescent flood bulbs to | heat and provide light. The only consistent place we can find | them is at a small mom and pop hardware store (similar to the | reference in the article). I just checked our supply and they | have a weird import sticker and have text in multiple | languages. | roflyear wrote: | Haha, well makes sense I guess! | dghughes wrote: | Easybake toy ovens used incandescent bulbs to bake brownies. | goalieca wrote: | I live somewhere that snow on traffic lights can be a problem. | Same with headlights and tail lights. | alden5 wrote: | one application where led's won't work at all is oven lights. | Nobody makes an led oven light because they're required to | withstand really high temperatures, glass enclosed | incandescents can handle the heat just fine while led's just | melt. | twoodfin wrote: | The hidden, diffuse social & economic cost of forgoing a carbon | tax. | apienx wrote: | It went like this in the EU: "Bulk purchasing of incandescent | bulbs was reported ahead of the EU lightbulb ban. Many retailers | in Britain, Poland, Austria, Germany and Hungary have reported | bulk purchasing,[126][127][132][133][134] and in Germany, sales | rose by up to 150% in 2009 in comparison to 2008.[125] Two-thirds | of Austrians surveyed stated they believe the phase-out to be | "nonsensical", with 53.6% believing their health to be at risk of | mercury poisoning.[135] 72% of Americans believe the government | has no right to dictate which light bulb they may use.[136] Czech | Republic President Vaclav Klaus urged people to stockpile enough | incandescent bulbs to last their lifetime.[137]" | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_incandescent_li... | | From my understanding, the ban will start somewhere around Q4 | this year. Still, you'll always be able to buy them for | "decoration purposes". | ryanjshaw wrote: | Seems like a great time to start designing space heaters that | accept 10-20 E27 incandescent 'heating elements'. (Well, until | this is banned too.) | dividedbyzero wrote: | Back then LEDs were still quite a bit worse, so I got some | spare incandescents too. I still have about 20 bulbs somewhere | that I got for cheap as retailers were emptying their | inventories. I have switched almost all lights to Ikea Tradfri | bulbs that are controlled via Zigbee2MQTT and Home Assistant | and I wouldn't go back. I still have an incandescent bulb in | one lamp, but the Ikea ones set to the right temperature are so | close I don't think I could tell them apart. | account42 wrote: | > From my understanding, the ban will start somewhere around Q4 | this year. Still, you'll always be able to buy them for | "decoration purposes". | | They are very efficient heat bulbs after all. | throwthrowuknow wrote: | As we continue to shift our primary motivation for creating | products away from what is best for the consumer towards what is | best for an artificially determined goal we will increasingly see | the compounding secondary effects of those choices. | elil17 wrote: | The "artificially determined goal" here is not roasting | ourselves alive in 50 years, which I for one think is a better | goal than "satisfying consumer preferences." | fifticon wrote: | let's also not forget maximizing shareholder value, if only | for a brief beautiful moment. | jwestbury wrote: | I believe that "not creating an uninhabitable environment" is | probably best for the consumer, yes? Surely, if you are posting | on hn, you are aware that people do not always make the best | decisions for themselves in the long term, and that putting | guard rails in place is a good mechanism to prevent us from | accruing (technical|environmental) debt? | throwthrowuknow wrote: | [flagged] | uranium wrote: | One thing I haven't seen mentioned elsewhere is that the energy | savings of LEDs may not actually be what you expect. We heat our | home something like 330 days of the year. If we use LED bulbs | instead of incandescents, we just have to run the gas furnace | more to make up for the "saved" heat energy. | | Add in the fact that LEDs have a much higher embedded energy of | manufacture, and the fact that they seem to last a lot less than | the 10 years they're specced for, and switching my house to LEDs | appears to have increased our carbon footprint. Plus now we're | using more heavy metals and such in circuit boards. Aaaaand the | light sucks. | timbit42 wrote: | Depending on how warm your summers are, LED bulbs will reduce | the amount of air conditioning you need. | bmacho wrote: | Of course. It's the market and negative selection. The companies | that accidentally made long-lasting LED bulbs all went bankrupt. | | Governments (or other non-profit organizations) should create | light bulbs, for the people, and not for the stockholders. | timbit42 wrote: | They should have advertised they were long-lasting and charged | more. | daneel_w wrote: | I've been surprised several times the past decade by how many | people just don't notice the poor quality of light with low CRI, | that the light is "hollow" and missing a chunk in the red/yellow | part of the spectrum. Thankfully LED bulbs are getting better, | and a lot of affordable offerings these days hover around 90 CRI. | Same goes for the problem with indirect flickering, which the | past few years have mostly gone away thanks to producers finally | spending two cents more per bulb to fit them with adequate | capacitors. | jwie wrote: | We can only imagine what the lightbulb world would look like if | the Phoebus cartel didn't hamstring R&D. | | Some might be tempted to believe that we'd have discovered what | technology they suppressed, but they are insufficiently | pessimistic. Technology gets worse all the time, and lightbulbs | are a great example of that happening on purpose. | V__ wrote: | Technology Connection had a video about how hard it is to find | LEDs which have a more classically warm appearance these days: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbvVnOxb1AI | tomatotomato37 wrote: | I hate how many of these things aren't limits of the technology | but rather the result of cost optimization and general apathy | towards the customer. We know how to mass-produce quality LEDs to | the point entire TVs are made of the things. We know how to mass- | produce rectifiers pretty much ever since diodes existed. We know | how to cool mass-produced objects in compact spaces. But because | we apparently can't have nice things, we don't get the product of | all that knowledge; instead we get whatever cost optimized | bullshit gets shat out of a factory run by MBAs. | | This same reasoning is why I'm not bullish on AI; what the | potential is and what we peasants get to use are vastly different | Johnny555 wrote: | _rather the result of cost optimization and general apathy | towards the customer_ | | Apathy _towards_ the consumer, or _by_ the consumer? I don't | think I'm alone when I say that I just buy name brand LED bulbs | (usually Phillips) in the color temperature of my choice and am | completely satisfied with them. Color rendition is fine, no | noticeable flicker, long lifetime. In the past 7 years I | haven't had any fail prematurely, though I've replaced some | early to change color temperature. | 0xbadcafebee wrote: | > the result of cost optimization and general apathy towards | the customer | | aka capitalism? People prioritize price over quality, but you | can't make something better the cheaper it gets. So in an open | and "fair" competitive market, all goods and services get | shittier over time. It's a race to the bottom. | markdestouches wrote: | > This same reasoning is why I'm not bullish on AI; what the | potential is and what we peasants get to use are vastly | different | | It's not peasants who's gonna use AI, it's the elite. Peasants | are gonna get nothing. | jklinger410 wrote: | This is a trend that has spread into every aspect of | specifically American society. | | Items have been replaced with poorer quality versions, and the | originals become incredibly expensive or impossible to find. | Once the downsides of the new version become clear, you are | left with obvious and uncounted inflation. It's a mixture of | shrink-flation and planned obsolescence. | | Examples such as: 100% juice, window blinds, light-bulbs, | furniture, vegetables (tomatoes, corn, etc), produce | (specifically meat), buildings/building materials. | | Until one day you notice you are living in a fake house and | eating fake food. And some guy who works for the fed says you | have it better than ever because you have a microwave. | | Late stage capitalism started in the 80s. | hinkley wrote: | I can sell a million devices that cost me $4 apiece, or I can | sell 1.5 million devices that cost me $3 apiece. That only | stops if I have a competitor selling $4.60 bulbs that take away | all of my customers. | | As long as we're all shoveling shit, nobody gets a whiff of | fresh air. | notatoad wrote: | just because somebody decides to geek out about LED bulbs, | does't mean all those stats that are theoretically measurable | actually make a difference. | | the 4-for-$10 A19 LED bulbs from amazon or ikea are flicker | free to my eyes. i've bought some fancy bulbs with big metal | heatsink bases, supposed "high CRI" ratings, equivalently high | price tags. to my eyes, i can't see the difference. the super- | cheap bulbs from one of those amazon marketplace sellers with a | randomly generated name are flickery, but just going up to | anything other than the absolute bare minimum of quality is | good enough. "what the peasants get to use" is because that's | actually probably good enough for what us peasants need. if you | want to geek out about super high-end LEDs, you're not going to | find that in consumer-grade products and that's probably fine. | _rs wrote: | > are flicker free to my eyes | | Very rarely will bulbs visibly flicker in my experience. What | happens instead is after several hours I'll start to get | headaches and feel fatigue without knowing exactly where it's | coming from. Since I replaced my Hue bulbs (which flicker, | and I proved it by just using my smartphone camera even) I've | felt so much better at home | elcritch wrote: | I second the A19 and other bulbs from Ikea. I live right | next to an Ikea and it turns out their bulbs are pretty | good. Even the housing feels better than Phillips or | others. | | I used to have an expensive Phillips light alarm and it | flickered like no other. Especially if you lower the | dimming you'll tend to see more flickering or just notice | an "ick" feeling with crappier bulbs. | notatoad wrote: | >which flicker, and I proved it by just using my smartphone | camera even | | all bulbs have some flicker, and the fact that it resonates | with your phone screen's refresh rate or your camera | sensor's sample rate doesn't really mean anything. | dang wrote: | We detached this subthread from | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35372444 - it's fine, but | I'm trying to prune things so the thread isn't so top heavy. | throwaway173738 wrote: | The problem is, as always, the MBAs. | dyno12345 wrote: | it doesn't take a degree to figure out when consumers are | only comparing prices when shopping | rusk wrote: | It's not MBAs place to set public policy though is it? If | it's the MBA's fault at all it's because they're doing their | job which is optimising the product to the market. If the | markets not optimising the right things then that's a failure | in the market. Maybe the market is being manipulated somehow | has it was for the old incandescent bulbs - but that's not | necessarily the fault of the management tier ... some | economise regulate for consumer value ... some for profit | adgjlsfhk1 wrote: | The problem is that people have a limited amount of caring | and markets are really good at taking advantage of consumer | ignorance. If you care about color rendering but don't know | what color rendering is, you can't shop for it (and if you | do know what it is you can't shop for it if it's not on the | spec sheet). | mcronce wrote: | > if you do know what it is you can't shop for it if it's | not on the spec sheet | | This drives me _absolutely insane_. When we were shopping | for a TV for the living room a few years ago I wanted a | 120Hz display. Finding one was a pain in the ass because | all anybody wanted to list in marketing material was the | backlight strobe rate; you had to dig and dig to find the | panel rate. | | No, I don't care that you can flash the backlight at a | thousand Hz, I want an actual panel that's well | synchronized with 24FPS content, and I don't want to | spend hours of research to figure out which displays have | one. | rusk wrote: | Sounds like issues that could be solved by some market | regulation - rules about labelling - etc etc but to many | that would be tantamount communism | raintrees wrote: | Instead of force, maybe voluntary? Publish/promote a set | of standard measurements for consumers, then let | consumers drive the manufacturers. "The Market" will | follow the consumer if the consumer is strongly inclined | about its desires - I think we have seen this play out in | other consumer electronics niches... | | When I was a teen, I wanted an alligator on my shirt, and | not too long after I started seeing simulacra shirts... | Enough of a demand for more than one entity to mimic | it... | kansface wrote: | Yeah, I'm back to wanting a curated shopping experience. | I don't want the cheapest thing. I don't want multiple | options- thats worse than nothing. I don't want to worry | about counterfeits or knockoffs. I don't want to do | research, consult the relevant /r and then look through | comment history to see who is paid to say what. I want a | store to have an opinion and stock high quality stuff. I | would happily pay a premium to offload decision making. | roughly wrote: | It remains the case that you don't discard your identity as | a person or personal responsibility when taking a job | somewhere, and the purpose of an MBA for the last 40 years | has been to produce crappier products for less money while | charging consumers the same amount. It's not the MBAs place | to set public policy, but it's also broadly an admission of | some kind of serious cultural failure to say we need public | policy to prevent a large group of people from stripping | everything they get their hands on down to the studs for | short-term gain, and it doesn't say great things about that | group of people, either. | [deleted] | greggsy wrote: | I have an MBA. It's not mine or any of my peer's jobs to | provide crap products to ends users - thats up to | shareholders to decide. | Phlarp wrote: | Pass that buck on down the line. | SargeDebian wrote: | How does that work? The head of engineering gets a unit | cost reduction target and then they call some shareholders | to come review some proposals for which option works best? | Do they show up with a printed certificate showing they own | at least one share? | kube-system wrote: | Public companies are required to hold annual meetings | with shareholders where they vote for board members and | bring up proposals. Shareholders may choose to vote for | board member with views about managing the business that | they agree with. | | https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/040315/what-can- | sha... | transcriptase wrote: | It's your job to decide whether to make the world slightly | worse and make an extra dollar, or maintain/improve quality | while finding efficiencies elsewhere. | | The second option may be more difficult but let's not | pretend there aren't companies that choose it and succeed. | greggsy wrote: | That's a very ignorant perspective. | | For me, it's rarely about efficiency, and almost always | about improving outcomes for workers and users. | | Micromanaging efficacy to maximise profit is an | economists job. | | If the general public wants a cheap, bad product, they | can do so, but they rarely have the inside knowledge to | discern quality. Marketing is responsible for telling | miseducating them. | bandyaboot wrote: | So what would you say you _do_ here? | Havoc wrote: | Painfully broad generalisation | verisimi wrote: | They are poor by design! You want repeat customers of course! | dredmorbius wrote: | It's a variant of the Market for Lemons problem: | | <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons> | | Discussed numerous times on HN: | <https://hn.algolia.com/?q=market%20for%20lemons> | | To get a market for lemons, the following characteristics are | required: | | - Nonuniform products or services with widely-varying quality. | | - Expensive quality assessment. | | - Poor information on relative quality, whether by distortions | by sellers or lack of sophistication of buyers, or both. | | You find this all over the place, with one notable example | being tech recruiting (which appears multiple times in the | HN/Algolia search above). | | This is also a characteristic which leads to _worsening_ | product quality as _formerly niche_ markets expand. Bicycles, | audio equipment, and electronics are classic instances of | these. A larger market is inherently less sophisticated, and | more easily distracted by spurious or irrelevant | characteristics of products. | | Another tendency is for cargo-culting and fads to develop. That | is, as products or services become more complex, a follow-the- | herd mentality appears, where (apparently successful) | influencers drive follow-on behaviour. Often, of course, the | influencers and early-adopters themselves have a poor | understanding or capability of distinguishing between high- and | low-quality offerings. Given random selection, some will emerge | as either successful or lucky over others. | | There are some mitigations. In the case of used-car markets, | for example, the emergence of vehicle history services (e.g., | CarFax), reduces informational asymmetries. In the case of | appliances, certification services (e.g., Underwriters | Laboratories) and review organisations (e.g., Consumer Reports) | aided greatly, as did uniform trade practices such as implied | warrantee of fitness and generous return policies (both of | which reduce buyers' risk). | | As for your assessment of AI's future market, that seems highly | probable to me, and would greatly dampen actual positive | prospects within the field. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | You can go buy high CRI, high quality bulbs right now. Nothing | is stopping you. | | Here is one common vendor: | https://store.waveformlighting.com/collections/a19-bulbs/ | | The issue isn't that MBAs have cost reduced bulbs for no | reason. The issue is that 95% of consumers will only choose the | cheap bulbs, period. As a result, that's what gets produced at | scale. | | > We know how to mass-produce quality LEDs to the point entire | TVs are made of the things. | | They're not the same thing. Displays are optimized for specific | R, G, and B color points. White LEDs are optimized for full, | smooth spectrums. | samsolomon wrote: | Just chiming in to say that I'm a big fan of Waveform bulbs. | That's what I've been buying for the last two years. | nathan_jr wrote: | Any ideas why waveform doesn't offer recessed lighting | products? Is that a particular form factor that is difficult | to support high quality output? | NelsonMinar wrote: | One thing the NYMag article says is that CRI is not a very | good measure of light quality. I'd love to read more about | that on a technical level. | | _edit_ I learned a bit from a marketing blog article; CRI | measures reflection of 8 spot colors but it leaves out some | important parts of the spectrum, particularly deep red. | https://www.waveformlighting.com/tech/what-is-cri-color- | rend... | TD-Linux wrote: | Waveform Lighting bulbs have a great CRI and no camera | visible flicker, but even they are overdriven/undercooled. | I've already had one fail because of the PFC chip (I did an | autopsy). They also don't have enough bulk capacitance to not | flicker when other nasty loads are on the line. | | I did find these tables from Budget Light Forums handy for | shopping, however the fact that you have to use these I think | only reinforces the point of the article: | | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12jj1A6PNjHmWbFNu0FSi. | .. | | https://optimizeyourbiology.com/light-bulb-database | djmips wrote: | > You can go buy high CRI, high quality bulbs right now. | Nothing is stopping you. | | $200 Canadian (including shipping) for 6 bulbs is stopping | me. $33 / bulb with no guarantee how long they will last. | browningstreet wrote: | As consumers are we really supposed to do a ton of research | on _light bulbs_ and accept that we can 't run down to Home | Depot and get some new bulbs when they go out in our house? | egeozcan wrote: | If you speak German there's always Stiftung Warentest: | https://www.test.de/Lampen-im-Test-4436814-0/ | | I pay them and they do the research. A very logical | business model. | Symbiote wrote: | Which? magazine is an equivalent in Britain. | | https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/light-bulbs/article/how- | to-b... | | (Both will be irrelevant for Americans, I have never | noticed a multi-voltage bulb.) | jsmith99 wrote: | Which are great but they don't actually have any light | bulb reviews, just advice. | dr-detroit wrote: | [dead] | AceyMan wrote: | THD by me doesn't even stock the CREE bulbs anymore, just | the crappy FEIT generics. | | I had to drive all over town to find a specialty lighting | store with some 'real' Sylvania brand. (But then found the | supermarket across the street has Philips on the shelf. | Oof.) | dahfizz wrote: | No, the lightbulbs at home depot are inexpensive and they | work fine. On the other hand, if you care about CRI, then | you can also google for high-quality bulbs with a good CRI. | I don't really see a problem here? | deelowe wrote: | Not in my experience. It's always a crapshoot. | bondarchuk wrote: | The problem is that previously the low-effort default | option was great, and now the low-effort default option | is bad and to get the equivalent of the previous great | default you must now spend a bunch of extra time and | money. "Caring about CRI" is basically just caring about | the human visual system working correctly, that shouldn't | be some weird niche. | | Besides, I don't control the lighting decisions of every | place I go that's not my own home. And many people might | be impacted in tiny ways without even noticing (cf. the | old research about fluorescent lighting in | schools/offices impacting mood or concentration or | whatever). | mturmon wrote: | > previously the low-effort default option was great | | You mean incandescents? I disagree, their efficiency is | terrible ("space heaters that happen to glow"). And their | lifespan was artificially limited. | bondarchuk wrote: | Fair enough. But at least the light was good. | OkGoDoIt wrote: | The problem is I used to be able to spend a couple | dollars on lightbulbs that consistently looked great and | didn't require a ton of research or money. I've bought | hundreds and hundreds of dollars worth of high-end LED | lightbulbs since moving into my new place last year, and | the lighting here still looks like crap. Even with budget | it's hard to get something that looks good. Finding | something that dims without flickering, the issue with | dimming not actually warming like mentioned in the | article, trying to match color temperatures to actually | look good, so many issues. I've tried to splurge and get | good lights and good dimmers but I'm still not happy with | how it's turned out. And if you go in any home or | restaurant where they haven't dedicated substantial time | and money into good lighting, things are downright | painful these days. I desperately miss incandescent | bulbs. I've been told by several people that I seem oddly | sensitive to this, but it's a huge deal as far as I'm | concerned. | seanp2k2 wrote: | Check out WAC lighting. You'll pay for the quality, but | it's there. Work with a local lighting store to guarantee | results. There are other high-end brands too, but WAC are | very popular and what many high-end hotels and | restaurants use. | uxp100 wrote: | I bought Feit lightbulbs at a big box home store (not the | cheapest option). Half of the 6 I bought failed in 6 | months. The rest seem to be going strong at least... | zaroth wrote: | If you want nice things that engineers spent thousands of | hours researching, designing, and tuning, you can do the | research to find those brands and pay extra for them. | | Most people don't want to pay the premium and don't value | the benefits that come with that premium. | kleer001 wrote: | Reddit's /r/buyitforlife 's 1.4 million subscribers and | probably 10x as many people that visit without joining | reddit and the subsequent similar population of people | scraping that data and consuming the scraped data... I | think they would disagree with you. | | That said, even if that's generously 100 million people | that's a drop in the bucket compared to the rest of the | population of consumers that couldn't care less. | trgn wrote: | > Most people don't want to pay the premium and don't | value the benefits that come with that premium. | | This is also called boiling the frog. People actually do | care, but in the scheme of things, they'll accept it. | | The default lightbulb in the store 20 years ago had a | tender warm light. The default lightbulb in the store | today has garish light, or doesn't dim, or has that ugly | plastic half cover. A real decline in quality of life. | but sure, we can be dismissive about it, of course you | can spend hours on the internet figuring it out (ignoring | the fact that it took no effort whatsoever to get nice | lighting before). | ClumsyPilot wrote: | > you can do the research to find those brands and pay | extra for them | | This is such a lie - no, you can't do the research. There | are no reseatch papers conparing consumer products | | Doing the research means buying everything avaliable on | the market and testing it yourself. | | Googling is not research, its choosing which SEO'd | fraudulent article will lie to you today. | | Quality is going to shit, because there is no way to twll | apart which item is qualify. The market is failing. | zaroth wrote: | I mean... just here in this comment section are | suggestions for suppliers of premium LEDs that I would | trust based on the karma rating of the people who posted | the links. | | Googling for "premium LED high ratings 95 cri" or | searching on Amazon definitely isn't going to work, | because they will just send you to the highest bidder, or | the most proficient scammer. | ClumsyPilot wrote: | The comment section is great , but if I need to find out | quality of a random consumer product, what is the chance | I will find it in this comment section? like 1%? | zaroth wrote: | You go where the people who might know better talk about | these things! | | AV forums for picking a TV or projector, cooking forums | for picking a knife set, and HN, you know, for picking | the contrast level of your <body> text. | ClumsyPilot wrote: | For most of my purchases, I cannot find any trustworthy | content at all. This experience is shared by 90% of | people I talk to | DubiousPusher wrote: | You could ask that question about every consumer product | since the 90s. | piuantiderp wrote: | This is the tragedy of modern times in the West. Hard to | get _anything_ quality without tons of research. Not even | about the money, there 's just too much noise | [deleted] | ClumsyPilot wrote: | Yeah, just paying PS2000 fot an item does not mean you | got anything quality - 90% chance you got scammed | bradleyjg wrote: | Yes, exactly. It's one thing to need to be an expert to | find a diamond in the rough. It's another to not be able | to guarantee you'll get a premium product by going to a | reputable retailer and picking out an expensive whatever. | That's the really frustrating part. | | I think the issue is that there are no more reputable | retailers. Just amazon, which more than half the time | isn't even amazon. | gwright wrote: | > This is the tragedy of modern times in the West. | | What does "in the West" mean here? Is the situation | better outside "the West"? Is this really a modern | "tragedy"? Caveat Emptor is not a new saying. | michael1999 wrote: | That's not entirely true. I guarantee that someone at Philips | is tuning their drivers not just on manufacturing cost, but | also to "optimize" lifetime. That you can pay a premium for | less "optimized" drivers is as much about market segmentation | as it is about BOM costs. | | As evidence, notice that Philips refuses to sell the Dubai | lamp outside Dubai. They are designed for truly long | lifetimes, and nobody at Philips want's that. | michael1999 wrote: | In SaaS this is considered normal. At least 15% of systems | cost is the complexity of having different tiers of | service, and selectively turning them on and off, and | making sure the system is still coherent when intentionally | crippled. These are real engineering expenses to make the | product deliberately less functional. | | What fraction of Microsoft Windows engineering goes into | the complexity of picking and combining the feature sets of | Windows Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, | Enterprise, and Ultimate? It isn't 0. | | Engineering that is negative for user-value is routine in | big business. It's a big part of what MBAs are for. It is | such a counter-intuitive thing to do that it requires | special training. | BolexNOLA wrote: | Thanks for the tip! Just ordered a light bulb from them to | check them out against the standard crap I have around my | house. Curious to see the results. | seanp2k2 wrote: | The "VIVID" line by SORAA are also high-quality high-CRI LEDs | with good cooling solutions, and they're available in things | like MR16 GU10 for desk lamps with the "weird" bulbs with two | little prongs. I got a cheap GU10 desk clamp lamp on Amazon | and spent twice as much as the lamp itself (which came with a | functional bulb) on the nicer bulb. The exact model was | SM16GA-09-60D-930-03 if anyone is curious -- fabulous super- | bright desk lamp that is very flood-y and covers a large area | with a very small lamp head. | | But yeah, explaining to normal folks that they need $30-$60 | lightbulbs for every fixture in their home is basically a | non-starter, but for me, I use this lamp every day and it | should last a decade or more, so the value prop isn't bad, | especially compared to spending $500 or so on something like | a Humanscale "nice" desk lamp, which technically has much | worse CRI and much lower output. | | We recently built our home and went with WAC recessed | lighting in all the main areas, which was about a $15k | premium over just using what the contractor wanted to use, | involved a lighting design company (that was also purchased | the fixtures from), and took a dozen+ hours of our time and | input, but I think it was worth it in the grand scheme of how | much we spent. I personally can't stand hanging out at | peoples houses where they have mismatched lights or just very | poor lighting; it kills any interior design niceties and | makes you really realize how much lighting affects the | general feeling of indoor spaces. | mschuster91 wrote: | > The issue is that 95% of consumers will only choose the | cheap bulbs, period. | | Because the big box stores (Walmart, Home Depot or whatever) | don't carry expensive stuff with Cree LEDs and solid cooling | designs. They carry whatever shit they can get their hands on | for as cheap as possible. | | And most consumers don't know better, the 1% of consumers | that _does_ know orders from Amazon and prays for not getting | ripped off by counterfeiters. | oezi wrote: | The primary issue is that the 'good' bulbs cost 4x but are | only 30%-50% better. | | It is a clear ripoff. | hdjjhhvvhga wrote: | As a side point, the bulbs from the link you shared might be | of good quality but very, very low power by my standards. In | order to work comfortably I need "200W replacements", not | 40W-60W. This has enormous influence on my mood in winter | months, probably people in warmer climates care less. | vitaflo wrote: | They also sell 100w equivalents (1600 lumens) in an A12 | form factor, FWIW. | beebeepka wrote: | > White LEDs are optimized for full, smooth spectrums. | | I thought full spectrum LEDs are future tech because I | haven't seen one. | jsmith45 wrote: | I really wish i could find a brand that would reliably tick | all the boxes: | | - Does not overdrive the LEDs and Does not run power supply | components at the limit of what they can. (Thus good | longevity) | | - Has a current based driver, so that slight voltage shifts | from an appliance kicking on don't result in an obvious | brightness shift. | | - Suitable for use in recessed lighting or enclosed fixtures. | (For better or worse, can lights and enclosed fixtures are | still relatively common.) | | - Makes bulbs in most common shapes like A19, chandelier, and | PAR/BR shapes (for recessed lighting fixtures) | | - Dimmable (And yes, I am quite well aware that being in | conjunction with a current source driver is more complicated, | but it is still possible). I'm not even particularly big on | dimming, but I am big on smart switches, and many of those | include dimming capabilities, and I don't want to worry about | which bulbs I put where. | | - Good color rendering index (and other similar features) | | Even the linked companies products don't meet the full list. | Their only dimmable A-series bulbs are the filament bulbs, | which are not suitable for all use cases. Similarly, non of | the non-filament bulbs in the A series shapes are marked as | suitable for use in an enclosure. | cesaref wrote: | Not sure where you are located, but if you have ceiling | halogens to replace, there are two options - to use a low | voltage bulb + separate PSU or the 'all in one' bulbs. Here | in the UK they are designated GU10 for mains voltage and | MR16 for 12v. If you go with 12v bulbs, you can invest in a | decent power supply for them, and hence also avoid the poor | quality bulb problem. | | It's possible to get power supplies to support multiple | bulbs daisy chained, so you can invest in one decent power | supply. | | For general bulbs (e.g. chandelier tulip bulbs) i've found | it to be really hard to find stuff that works reliably. | 'Normal' round bulbs seem to be more reliable for some | reason. | smolder wrote: | The only bulbs I've found that work in tight enclosures | without overheating and failing are a design that's | probably 90% aluminum heatsink by weight and over 50% by | volume, with a relatively small dome diffuser on top. I | couldn't find a US distributor, so bought a box direct from | the manufacturer on Alibaba. They were $20+ per bulb even | from the factory, so not cheap. Beyond the crazy cooling, | they have a thermal shutoff feature to prevent failure if | they get too hot. Generally it's better to find an | appropriately breathable fixture for LED bulbs, or even | better, ditch retrofit bulbs and get something with a | separate DC power supply. | ikekkdcjkfke wrote: | I think ikea has some nice bulbs. Almost no flicker on slo | mo camera. Their rechargeable batteries however are bad | mixmastamyk wrote: | Their bulbs and batteries work great here. | soulofmischief wrote: | 99% of white LEDs on the market arhave anything but full, | smooth spectrums. Most of my lighting is from waveform | lighting but you have to pay the premium for full spectrum, | plus you have to shell out for expensive dimmers if you don't | want flickering. | cratermoon wrote: | You _can_ , but as GP comment said, "Good indoor lighting is | now something only people with plenty of disposable income | can afford." When you're poor, are you going to cough up $18 | for a single bulb, or get a 16-pack for $24 at Home Depot? | $288 vs $24. | Dylan16807 wrote: | So "is now something" implies that incandescent was | affordable. | | 16 incandescent bulbs, averaging 3 hours per day, would | cost about 50 cents per day. $150-$250 per year in most of | the country. | | So getting the really premium LEDs is still cheaper than | lighting used to be. Even better if you use the good bulbs | for room lighting and the cheap bulbs for closets and | outdoors and such. | jghn wrote: | The big problem for me is, as a consumer, how do I _know_ | that brand X is producing quality bulbs that 'll last a long | time? I'm very happy to pay more for that. How does one sift | through marketing to get to actual quality? | | And then how do I know that they stick with the high quality | approach? What happens when a brand decides to rest on the | laurels of their brand name and start slipping in lower | quality parts? | xxs wrote: | Weight them and buy the heaviest one, for E27 likely you | don't wish to go over 8-10W of total power (this can be | measured easily as well). | | A scale that can measure grams is like $10. | ccvannorman wrote: | > as a consumer, how do I know that brand X is producing | quality bulbs that'll last a long time? | | Like any informed consumer you must read every retail-based | HN comment thread ;-] | seanp2k2 wrote: | Philips is generally a safe bet, and G.E. + Osram are as | well. The generic crap at Home Depot and Amazon and | Walmart that costs 1/4 as much will probably perform | awful, but could be a hidden gem. Some dead giveaways are | total lack of heatsinks and low price, but higher price | does not necessarily equal good quality. | drjasonharrison wrote: | I was going to dismiss your comment as being naive. Because | every generation before us had to deal with the problem of | "how do I know that I'm getting quality item X from | supplier Y?" See the clay tablet complaining about the | quality of a bronze shipment. The answer really is "you | have to test it" and frankly return policies at stores | generally support purchase, test, and decide to keep or | return. An option that many of our ancestors did not have, | and yes not everyone can do this. | | On the other hand, Daniel Kahneman was awarded a Nobel | prize in 2002 for researching with Amos Tversky on how we | make decisions, and how having more options makes our | eventual decision less fulfilling as we suspect that we | probably did not make the optimal decision. However, done | is better than perfect. At least that's what some people | say. | | Given that we have multiple technology purchases to make, | all of which will involve "research" and making decisions | it is very frustrating, to me, that we do not have more | reliable trustworthy guidance. There are competent review | organizations and websites but they more frequently tend to | be owned by product manufacturers and funded by | advertisers. We know that marketing tries to create desire | in our primitive consumer brains. | | And as individuals with deep and long experience in at | least one or more areas, we have our own biases that help | us make decisions. And if we think carefully about how we | gained this expertise, we should conclude that a lot of | wasted time and mistakes were involved. | | And we know that becoming an expert in lighting, spectral, | power consumption, lifetime, CRI, etc could take a long | time and there would be more to learn as the engineers | create new solutions (blue LED plus yellow phosphor, or RGB | LEDs, COB or something else...). | | So to answer your question. You won't know that brand X | produces quality bulbs that last a long time until you | purchase and test them. Assume that they won't last a long | time, don't buy the most expensive option, there will be | improvements in LEDs and bulbs that will make your next | purchase even better. | | To sift past the marketing to get actual quality, well we | do have some well known brands that distribute through well | known stores. Buying from Alibaba or the dollar store is | not going to result in the best outcome, but it might. Put | those options aside as an experiment rather a "must make me | happy now" experience. | | How do you know that a product won't slip in quality over | time? Well you won't know until you make that purchase. | This happens all of the time with everything from salt | ("Himalayan" salt with rocks, sea salt with microplastics, | honey adulterated with sugar, olive oil with other oils)... | | We live in a very interesting time, we no longer have to | "follow the herd" or "hunt for the roots" in new locations. | We're mostly protected from weather, earthquakes, famine, | etc (exception occur). Our health generally good. There is | however dog poop on the sidewalk and pot holes in the | roads. | | So when the grocery store moves your familiar product to | another aisle, or changes their product line up, or | increases the price, these are all opportunities to step | out of "cruise control" and experience the uncertainty that | comes with a constantly changing world. | | "Marriage has no guarantees. If that's what you're looking | for, go live with a car battery." - Erma Bombeck | marcosdumay wrote: | > Because every generation before us had to deal with the | problem of "how do I know that I'm getting quality item X | from supplier Y?" | | Up to 70 years ago, item X had an extremely low | complexity, and up to some 30 years ago, supplier Y had | reliably constant quality between its products. | | No previous generation had to deal with the problem we | currently have. | chongli wrote: | _The big problem for me is, as a consumer, how do I know | that brand X is producing quality bulbs that 'll last a | long time?_ | | The issue is that LED bulbs aren't simple devices like | incandescent bulbs. LED bulbs have an electronic power | supply inside which drives the LEDs at a constant current. | | Power supply design is a major subfield of electronics | engineering and there are all kinds of tradeoffs you can | make to optimize for different goals. Consumer electronics | almost always optimizes for cost, to the detriment of all | else. | | It is possible (and not very difficult) to design LED bulbs | that will practically outlive their owners [1]. The problem | is that it requires putting more LEDs in the bulb and | driving them at lower current. This makes the bulb cost | more and the only benefit is longer life. For a | manufacturer, there are nothing but downsides to this | approach. | | [1] https://youtu.be/klaJqofCsu4 | fexl wrote: | I've noticed that LED bulb packages say they'll last | several years, but so many of them die after just a year | or so. I should start tracking this precisely, but I've | just gotten the sense that they often die prematurely. | t0bia_s wrote: | You have 2 year warranty. Return it. My dad did it so | often that they refuse to sell him a new one in that | shop. What an irony. | alexsereno wrote: | Why? That strikes me as odd, since the manufacturer is | the one who eats that warranty cost. | amalcon wrote: | Assuming that the retailer can actually get a refund or | replacement from the manufacturer (for some products, | only the consumer can actually do that), usually they | just replace the item or the wholesale price. They don't | replace the retailer's gross margin. Thus the retailer | ends up eating the cost of things like stocking and | actually processing the warranty. For e.g. a one-person | operation, that means extra work for zero profit. | | It's usually not that much, but I can see why they might | eventually be upset about it. | [deleted] | jasonlaramburu wrote: | >It is possible (and not very difficult) to design LED | bulbs that will practically outlive their owners | | It is also possible (and not very difficult) to design | incandescent bulbs that will outlive their owners. In | fact, the first mass produced light bulbs generally | lasted 2,500+ hours. In the 1920s, the major bulb | manufacturers formed the 'Pheobus Cartel' in Geneva and | secretly colluded to limit the lifespan of bulbs to 1,000 | hours to boost sales [1]. Another example of planned | obsolescence harming consumers and the environment. | | [1]https://interestingengineering.com/science/everlasting | -light... | bagels wrote: | 2500 hours is 100 days. I hope I live longer than 100 | more days :( | jasonlaramburu wrote: | Please consider reading the linked article. The longest | continuously active incandescent bulb in the world was | switched on in 1901. | shagie wrote: | This goes into the "actual conspiracy - not a theory" | category. | | Veritasium - This is why we can't have nice things - | https://youtu.be/j5v8D-alAKE | | The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy | https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-great-lightbulb-conspiracy | | > On 23 December 1924, a group of leading international | businessmen gathered in Geneva for a meeting that would | alter the world for decades to come. Present were top | representatives from all the major lightbulb | manufacturers, including Germany's Osram, the | Netherlands' Philips, France's Compagnie des Lampes, and | the United States' General Electric. As revelers hung | Christmas lights elsewhere in the city, the group founded | the Phoebus cartel, a supervisory body that would carve | up the worldwide incandescent lightbulb market, with each | national and regional zone assigned its own manufacturers | and production quotas. It was the first cartel in history | to enjoy a truly global reach. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel | garaetjjte wrote: | Devil's advocate: Incandescent lifetime is inversely | related to efficiency, thus Phoebus cartel prevented | spread of long-life but inefficient bulbs. | neuralRiot wrote: | An also should add that color temperature on incandescent | lamps play a role on its lifespan, want long lasting | lamps? Lower the current (or increase the resistance). | CydeWeys wrote: | Ah yes, people, famous for living less than _checks | notes_ 2,500 hours. | jasonlaramburu wrote: | Please consider reading the linked article first. The | longest continuously active incandescent bulb in the | world was switched on in 1901. | mariodiana wrote: | Perhaps the planned obsolescence helped the consumer, | because perhaps there would have been no willing | producers if producing the lightbulbs at a price the | users were willing to pay for wasn't going to turn out to | be profitable, with respect to setting up production in | the first place and then producing until the investment | was paid back. | | When we're talking market price, we have to acknowledge | that it is a _meeting_ of the price needed to bring a | product to market _and_ the price the consumer is willing | to pay. We can 't assume that the price of the longer | lasting bulb would have been attractive to consumers, | when compared to the price of the shorter-lived bulb, | _even if they had all the information available._ | | It's perfectly valid for a person to decide they'll spend | more over the long run, rather than ponying up a larger | sum now. And it's perfectly valid for producers to take | the chance of deciding this for the consumer. As Henry | Ford noted, "If I had asked people what they wanted, they | would have said faster horses." | | Was anybody stopping anyone from offering the consumer a | higher-priced and longer-lasting bulb? | xxs wrote: | incandescent light bulbs efficiency increases with their | temperature/current. At low enough current they will last | long enough but waste a lot energy as well. | | You can dim them, and provide a slow start to prevent the | inrush current (which is like 10times more than nominal | with tungsten resistance increasing due so high 2500K | temps). | 6510 wrote: | put them in series | [deleted] | Maursault wrote: | Thankfully, LED lighting will probably be gone within 20 | years, while incandescent will be coming back more | efficient than LED could dream. Already bumping up | against theoretical maximum efficiency, LED lighting | can't get any more efficient, and the better LED is at | color rendition, the less efficient it is. But there are | vast amounts of improvement available for incandescent | lighting, and a group at MIT has already created | incandescent light that is twice as efficient as LED.[1] | | [1] https://news.mit.edu/2016/nanophotonic-incandescent- | light-bu... | seanp2k2 wrote: | Exciting, but that article is from 2016 and here we are | in 2023 with no commercial availability. https://www.redd | it.com/r/AskScienceDiscussion/comments/j6hwn... asked | what happened with no real updates. | ridgeguy wrote: | It seems like this could be done differently, and perhaps | more cost-effectively. Can't give cites right now, but | here's a path I'd explore if I were in the field. | | I'd pattern the inner surface of the glass envelope with | a cube texture - think of taking a cube and pressing a | corner normally into a clay surface, then removing the | cube. This pattern is a so-called corner reflector, and | returns incident light to its source. Figure the cube | indentations at about 0.5mm deep, close packed. I'd | deposit a dielectric film reflector stack tuned to | reflect most infrared radiation onto this surface. | | This combination would transmit visible light, but would | reflect IR directly back to the filament, reducing the | amount of electrical power needed to maintain filament | temperature. Glass textural molding and dielectric film | deposition are mature technologies. I think this could | readily triple incandescent lamp power efficiency, maybe | even better. | lightedman wrote: | That incandescent cant reach the theoretical 40%, at the | color temp/physical temp needed, the tungsten filament | would melt. | jghn wrote: | Yes, but this is exactly what I'm asking. How do I find | the ones designed in a buy it for life way? Or at least | ones designed to last longer than the crap on the Home | Depot shelves. | vl wrote: | You can't buy a bulb that is rated to last a lifetime, | but you can buy ones rated to last for 10+ years if used | 8 hours a day (i.e. 35,000 life hours). | | I retrofitted entire house - 200+ bulbs and fixture | retrofits more that 5 years ago. I had one or failures | since. I bought highest CRI bulbs, i.e. most expensive, | and they work well. (Also, do not use bulbs for | downlights - get entire "led can light fixture retrofit") | | I used 1000bulbs.com because I can filter/read specs | there, but you can get specs for any high-tier vendor and | buy elsewhere. | jghn wrote: | > 35,000 life hours | | How trustworthy is that state though? I have always | assumed 0% trustworthy. Is that incorrect? | vl wrote: | I don't think it's untrustworthy in a sense you are | deliberately lied to. I think more likely problem is that | there is quality control issues and entire batch of | particular bulb is compromised, like can happen with | anything else - hard drives, RAM, pencils. | | In general it's quite reasonable. Cheaper bulbs failed on | me, more expensive ones work just fine for many years. | | One thing is I wonder about if phosphorus (or whatever | chemical they use) is burning out over the years. I.d. do | I get worse light quality as these bulbs age? | chongli wrote: | If you don't trust the manufacturers, you'll have to find | an expert to trust, or tear down the bulbs and examine | them yourself. The best way to know for sure is to | measure the current being driven through the LEDs and | compare it to their maximum rated current. The ones that | don't last long are usually being run at their maximum | current, producing a lot of excess heat which shortens | their lives dramatically. | e28eta wrote: | > The issue is that LED bulbs aren't simple devices like | incandescent bulbs. LED bulbs have an electronic power | supply inside which drives the LEDs at a constant | current. | | Not all of them! I was very surprised to open up my | generic outdoor patio LED bulbs and find two strips of | LED filament wired directly to power. | | AFAICT it's just enough LEDs in serial for 120VAC at 60 | Hz to be "good enough" that they survive for "long | enough". | com2kid wrote: | Take a time machine back to 2001, any LEDs you bought | back then will likely last over 60 years. | | Of course they won't be as efficient, and output very | little light, but they will last forever. (also, no | white, but hey, win some lose some!) | sp332 wrote: | Subscribe to Consumer Reports. | https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/lightbulbs/ | There are lots of categories of products that have the same | problem. This covers a bunch of them. | Tarball10 wrote: | California's JA8 certification requires LED bulbs to meet | specific criteria related to efficiency, lifespan, and | light quality. | | - Efficiency >= 45 lumens per watt | | - CRI >= 90 | | - R9 Color Rendering value >= 50 | | - Rated life >= 15000 hours | | - Minimum dimming level <= 10% | | - Flicker <= 30% | | Theoretically if a bulb is listed as JA8 compliant (and the | certification isn't fake) you know it at least meets these | thresholds. | garaetjjte wrote: | What does it mean to specify flicker in percents? | Tarball10 wrote: | > Light source in combination with specified control | shall provide "reduced flicker operation" when tested at | full light output as specified in JA10, where reduced | flicker operation is defined as having percent amplitude | modulation (percent flicker) less than 30 percent at | frequencies less than 200Hz. | | https://energycodeace.com/site/custom/public/reference- | ace-2... | com2kid wrote: | > - Rated life >= 15000 hours | | And what do you do when the lightbulb burns out after | only 3 years? The product has long since changed SKU, the | manufacturer gets to claim they fixed any deficiencies | (and it'll take years to find out if they are telling the | truth), and you long since lost any proof of purchase. | Tarball10 wrote: | Yeah there's not much you could personally do, other than | maybe report it to the California Energy Commission. | Bulbs need to be lab tested and the results submitted to | the CEC, but I'm not sure how the lifespan testing is | actually done, how accurate it is, or how easily it could | be manipulated. | neuronexmachina wrote: | > CRI >= 90 | | This one was a little tricky for me when I was buying | bulbs last year. I prefer warm-colored bulbs, and I was | kind of confused why Amazon kept on saying it was | refusing to ship bulbs to me. It took me a while before I | realized it was because I'm in CA and the CRI was too | low, and Amazon didn't have a way to just filter by CRI. | Eventually my wife just ended up finding some warm-ish | LED bulbs at a local store. | seanp2k2 wrote: | It's crazy to me that in 2023, Amazon still refuses to | offer meaningful product filtering. The miscategorization | of items has been written about many times, and the best | explanation for why they're not fixing it is basically | "people like digging through piles of trash to find the | good stuff". It's an infuriating experience and these | days I typically use Google to search Amazon because | their basic search will many times fail to show the | product when I search for the exact product name or model | designation, even when they do in fact carry it. On | Google it'll be the first result. Google obviously can't | filter Amazon products by category, let alone other | parameters, but it's just so frustrating vs using other | sites like McMaster-Carr, DigiKey, etc. | throw10920 wrote: | > The big problem for me is, as a consumer, how do I know | that brand X is producing quality ${PRODUCT} that'll last a | long time? I'm very happy to pay more for that. How does | one sift through marketing to get to actual quality? | | That's the million-dollar question of the '10s and '20s | (and likely beyond), and is far bigger than just bulbs. | | The only solution that I can think of that _could_ work is | a distributed rating system with a built-in web of trust. | It theoretically shouldn 't be that difficult for people to | adopt, if only they got collectively fed up with the | universe of crap we have now, and someone provided a nice | app and protocol to federate information with. | | (direct regulation of quality, vendor-controlled ratings, | and browsing Reddit/HN comment threads are all fatally | flawed non-solutions) | BizarroLand wrote: | I spent probably $150-$200 for 7 packages of "high CRI" | "long lasting" phillips brand LED bulbs last year, for a | total of 28 bulbs. | | 6 of them have failed in less than 9 months, either | flickering so badly it could cause an epileptic seizure or | just straight up dying on me. | | It's maddening. | smolder wrote: | Look at the fixtures you're putting them in and consider | if they're getting adequate cooling. If your average | "long lasting" (they all claim this, but not at what | temperature...) LED bulb is uncomfortably hot to touch, | it's on the fast track to failure. | sp332 wrote: | Mine are hanging in thin air over my bathroom mirror. The | GE Reveal bulbs say they're good for bathrooms, but I | suspect they don't like the humidity. I have four at a | time in the fixture and six of them have died in the last | two years. Once this box is empty I'll get something | else. | vxNsr wrote: | If you still have the receipt you can file a warranty | claim. | smolder wrote: | Ah, probably not a heat problem, then. | sp332 wrote: | Oh, it's a good point to look out for. I'm just really | annoyed at these. | jimbobjim wrote: | The Phillips bulbs I bought have a ridiculously high | failure rate. About half have failed within 6 months. | Much worse than the supermarket own brands, or cheaper | ones from Amazon. | cesaref wrote: | Meanwhile I replaced around 40 halogen bulbs with Philips | branded bulbs around 5 years ago, and have not had a | single failure. | | It's possible the quality has changed, but i'm also | wondering whether the mains voltage might be a factor - | there is quite a wide range of possible voltages allowed | whilst still being in-spec, so maybe i'm lucky at my | properties and mains voltage is on the low end of the | standard and maybe you're running hot. It's all most | frustrating! | | BTW, I went with Philips on the basis that there was a | good chance that if I did need to replace a few after a | year or two due to failures i'd be likely to be able to | source the same bulb, as it's really annoying if you find | one bulb a different colour than the others... | olyjohn wrote: | The Philips Hue bulbs somehow never burn out. I have | about 30 of them in my house, and the oldest ones (5+ | years old now) are working as well as the new ones that I | have bought recently. They are the only "smart" thing | that I have in my house, because they're the only thing | I've ever hooked up that worked with 100% reliability. | They don't require an internet connection, etc. I never | have connection problems, never have to reboot the hub, | the switches work for me 100% of the time. | 8note wrote: | I've got a couple burnouts on Phillips hue bulbs | cataphract wrote: | Same. I have half a dozen hue bulbs from 2016 and none | hav failed. The ones I have from Innr have not failed | either. 4 of them are outdoors. | | With Philips spinning off the lights division, I don't | know the current quality. | | On the other hand, I've had others (non smart ones) | starting to flicker or otherwise just dying after as | little as one year. | neuralRiot wrote: | The best i have found are unbelievable from Ikea, the've | been in daily use for almost 2 years already. | louky wrote: | Best case there is to never buy again, name and shame the | specific model places like this discussion, and use the | warranty! | | PITA I know. | seanp2k2 wrote: | If the warranty expires, buy the same ones from | $BIG_BOX_STORE and return the broken ones. The companies | send them back to the mfgs for credit. They'll get the | hint eventually. | sokoloff wrote: | If the bulb lasts past the warranty and then dies, you | recommend that we defraud the manufacturer of the bulb? | eth0up wrote: | I had similar issues with Phillips. I bought six over a | year for the relatively excellent quality of the light, | but they'd start flickering after a month or two. I had | first suspected an electrical problem, but then tried | them at entirely different locations in entirely | different sockets and found the same. Haven't considered | buying Phillips since and won't, ever. Nice light, shit | construction. | Self-Perfection wrote: | One guy bought over 4 thousands LED lamps over years, | meticulously measured their actual specs and made a huge | online catalog https://lamptest.ru/ | | I follow his project a bit and it looks like consumers are | really at loss. Generally there is no reliable way to | choose a good led lamp without consulting such catalog. | Lamps packaging often lies about actual specs, lamps with | the same packaging but manufactured in different years | might have different quality etc | leobg wrote: | Great site. I wish he had an English translation. But I | forgive him. This is what the Internet should be! | Individual people who do one thing really well. So happy | to see that this still exists online. | klabb3 wrote: | I wish it had a Swedish translation. I do NOT forgive | him. | [deleted] | thuttinger wrote: | There is one guy that does the same for batteries, | chargers, power supplies and more: https://lygte-info.dk/ | leobg wrote: | Thank you. Had been looking for something like this! | Batteries are one of these items where you really don't | know what you're getting. | walterbell wrote: | Could we improve discovery of these indie sites via HN or | elsewhere? | | A standard tag for Algolia/web search could work, if any | spam comments with the same tag were flagged. | leobg wrote: | That would be the benevolent Engelbart version of AI, | wouldn't it? | | Instead of dumb capitalism, clickbait and silly content | marketing driving human activity, to have an AI that | saves us from wasting our time figuring out the answer to | questions that have been answered long before. And then, | instead, points us to those questions that have not yet | been asked, much less answered. What experiments have not | yet been done. | | After all, no GPT-4, no matter how many billions of | parameters, could tell you what the best battery is in | the world if it wasn't for that one human dude in his | garage in Denmark, or Latvia, or wherever, who actually | tested them all. | walterbell wrote: | Absolutely. There have been some attempts to reboot | webrings for indie site discovery. With AI harvesting and | monetizing indie sites, there is some risk of future | content being gated by pay/auth/bot walls. Another | approach could be private overlay P2P VPNs where | participants are invited/vetted by the social contract of | a small community. | | (random indie site: wet/dry shop vacuums, | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32411206) | zajio1am wrote: | > The big problem for me is, as a consumer, how do I know | that brand X is producing quality bulbs that'll last a long | time? I'm very happy to pay more for that. How does one | sift through marketing to get to actual quality? | | There is simple heuristic - all LED bulbs are bad. They | generally have insufficient heatsink and unreplaceable PSU | immediately next to LEDs. | | Better are LED tubes (with T12 interface, as a replacement | for fluorescent tubes), they have much more area for | cooling and for PSU, and sometimes have replaceable PSU. | Similarly lighting units with integrated LEDs. | gcr wrote: | Technology Connections has a great video about exactly | this! https://youtu.be/fsIFxyOLJXM?t=843 | | At the end of the day, the author recommends giving | filament-style LED bulbs a try, where the emitter is | built onto a thin filament away from the circuit housing | so it's far away from the heat. | jchw wrote: | Some bulbs will give you information on their CRI which | ideally should be required to be labeled on the bulbs | packaging the way calorie information is required on food | packaging (but I don't think it is.) That will tell you | roughly how good the quality of the light is by proxy of | the spectrum of light it covers. On the other hand, there | is no equivalent afaik for knowing how well the power | supply is designed or how hard the LEDs are driven. I guess | for that, the consumer can turn to the trusted source for | this kind of information, bigclivedotcom. (Sarcasm; but | seriously, this is a problem.) | mjx0 wrote: | bigclivedotcom, aka the Consumer Reports of electronics | that catch on fire and/or perform miracles. | terr-dav wrote: | An important point in the article is that CRI for LED | bulbs does not meaningfully map to the light quality. | >Oh, but: Experts agree that the color-rendering index | doesn't really index how colors are rendered. Some bulbs | with a 90 CRI make things look wan; some with an 80 are | passable. There are better, more useful metrics, but you | can't have them. Nobody puts them on the packaging. One | lighting professional -- an LED advocate, no less -- told | me he sometimes calls up the manufacturer and asks to | talk to an engineer to get the real specs. | jchw wrote: | Yes that's a good point, there's definitely more to it | than _just_ CRI. That said, a bulb with very poor CRI | definitely sucks, so it 's not entirely useless. This | seems like one of those things that will suck until it | doesn't. | mech987987 wrote: | CRI has to do the hard job of describing a spectrum using | a single number. It's like looking at the entire menu of | a restaurant and having to say how healthy the food there | is. (heck, there's probably way better metaphors). | marcosdumay wrote: | It's interesting how the led datasheets have all the | useful information (spectrum, CRI, angular spread). But | once manufacturers put them on a bulb, they will refuse | to tell even what leds they used. | | At this point I believe companies are willfully refusing | to inform their customers. | rkeene2 wrote: | That could be because putting it on the box creates a | liability that the LEDs are meeting those specifications | -- just because the source LEDs claim to meet those | specifications doesn't mean that the enclosure being sold | using them as a component will actually produce that. | Additionally, any change to LED suppliers/etc now means | that the box also has to be changed. | | In other words, what they are selling isn't the same as | the thing in the box nor the aggregate of all the | components (since they interact with one another). | llbeansandrice wrote: | Can't wait to become a mini-expert in fucking LED | lightbulbs just to have decent lighting in my house. I | hate that the vast information of the internet has | basically required us mere mortals to try and become | experts in literally anything and everything just to be | able to buy something that isn't awful. Computer? Better | keep up to date on all of the CPU, GPU, etc. info. That | doesn't even include the insanity of monitors. Cars? | Better spend multiple weekends doing research before | spending more weekends being ready to walk away from any | dealership just to play the stupid negotiation game. | | I feel like I can't just have a casual fun hobby anymore. | You have to have all of the knowledge about the entire | space just to be able to decide if something may or may | not be garage. | kube-system wrote: | > I hate that the vast information of the internet has | basically required us mere mortals to try and become | experts in literally anything and everything just to be | able to buy something that isn't awful. | | Awful junk existed before the internet. It's just that | people didn't have much of a way to know any better, nor | did they have many options to choose from. People relied | on word of mouth, marketing material, or the shop | keeper's advice to decide what to buy... that is, if the | store even had multiple options. | | There's not more crap today, there's more perspective. | acuozzo wrote: | > I hate that the vast information of the internet has | basically required us mere mortals to try and become | experts in literally anything and everything just to be | able to buy something that isn't awful. | | This has always been the case. The difference now is that | with the internet it's within reach. | | You don't have to dig through your social network to find | someone working for the lighting division of GE. You | don't have to visit your local library to check out books | on how lightbulbs work in order to figure out which makes | one better than another. You just need to hop on Google | or ask New Bing. | | -- | | Think all incandescent bulbs were the same? Think again. | Manufacturing conditions and filament thickness are two | of the several factors involved in how long that | lightbulb will last and how bright it will get. Cheap, | shitty lightbulbs from discount stores were a thing. | | Oh, and one more thing! You're pretty much stuck with one | color temperature. | | -- | | There are plenty of examples throughout the 20th century | of poorly-made, barely-working tech being sold as | acceptable. The plethora of non-electric "vacuum | cleaners" sold around the turn of the century are one | notable early example. The lightbulbs which came after | the agreements made by the Phoebus Cartel are another. | | 1978! Home video! Do you go with VHS from JVC, Betamax | from Sony, SelectaVision from RCA, or DiscoVision from | MCA? | | For an entertaining diversion, imagine you're living in | 1973 and it's time to purchase a new car. Is that | Plymouth really going to hold up against your new | concerns about gas mileage? How do you know? Do you have | any mechanic friends? Do you know anything about how cars | work? Does the local library have any books to help? | | Random final tidbit: The "older"=="better" myth is the | result of the fact that we're not exposed to the junk of | yesteryear; only the good stuff. The junk was thrown away | years and years ago. | panarky wrote: | Want to have a decent quality of life at the end of your | career? Better spend a large portion of your youth | becoming an expert in finance and monetary policy, and | hope you don't make a fatal mistake like buying long-term | government debt right before inflation starts to run. | sydd wrote: | I'm in the same boat. For the sake of simplicity find | some good brands and stick to them. Where I live its | simple, get all your bulbs at IKEA. Most of them are 90 | CRI and other parameters are good too. There are better | ones on the market, but I dont want to go on a product | hunt if my supplier is out | acomjean wrote: | That's the current problem is knowing when a "Brand" which | was a marker for quality cashes in. | | Consumer Reports tests a lot of consumer goods and used to | be my go to for testing. They don't take ad revenue so that | helps. Though you have to be a member to see their reviews. | | https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/about-us/what-we- | do/inde... | | They used to be the go to for car reliability info (when | your car was rated high you sold more, according to my dad | who was in the car business) | plemer wrote: | Why "used to"? Did something go wrong? Is there something | better now? | acomjean wrote: | I guess because I haven't bought anything in a while so | for me it was a "used to", not any perceived change. So | poor wording on my part. | | I can't edit my post. Trusted reviews are hard to find, I | would still trust Consumer Reports over random Amazon | reviews. | jahewson wrote: | > The issue is that 95% of consumers will only choose the | cheap bulbs, period. | | The hardware stores near me, both big and small, stock only a | single brand of bulb, as if they have some kind of exclusive | deal. | snickerbockers wrote: | This is why i do most of my shopping online. its not about | price or laziness, but about selection. retail stores | usually only stock the worst brands of anything. | dotancohen wrote: | Here is one common vendor: | | $18 USD for a single 10 Watt bulb? I don't care how expensive | electricity is, the $2 incandescent bulb is a better value. | ChadMoran wrote: | I've been looking for solid high CRI LED bulbs, thank you. | | Lately I've been using the GE Reveal/Relax. They were better | than the contractor grade bulbs that came with the house but | still just... wasn't there. | | If you know any other manufacturers like this I'd greatly | appreciate it if you could provide their links. | CrimsonCape wrote: | Budgetlightforum.com is the best source for flashlights and | bulbs. Everyone there knows the metrics of what makes good | light. | | GE Filled With Sun, Philips Ultra HD (available on Amazon, | but from Canada), and some other Chinese brands are | currently top of the chart for CRI 95+, RA 90+ bulbs | m463 wrote: | Budgetlightforum.com | | This is a rabbit hole of lighting tech. | | I read the site and ... Now all my flashlights MUST run | open source firmware. | | Buy a flashlight with the Anduril UI and you will | understand. (search on amazon) | | With my flashlights: | | - press and hold the power button to ramp up brightness | from zero | | - press and hold again to ram down brightness | | - click twice to get the maximum brightness from the | light (mostly) | | there are lots of other modes available, designed to be | harder to stumble into, plus customizations you can add. | | Also, the good flashlights have an always-on dim green | LED that lets you find the flashlight during a power | outage. | MengerSponge wrote: | I use GE Sun Filled bulbs at my desk. They're nice! I | really wish I could easily get the Lumitronix or LEDvance | models. | | http://www.seoulsemicon.com/en/technology/sunlike/casestu | dy/ | [deleted] | causality0 wrote: | Is there anything decent in the middle? Somewhere between one | dollar bulbs and eighteen dollar bulbs? | pkulak wrote: | I've been happy with my Cree leds. I can't seem to find | them online, only Home Depot. | nevir wrote: | Home Depot has an exclusively agreement with em | jghn wrote: | I used to buy Cree bulbs. But they they sold the brand and | were changed to be the same mass market schlock as the | other bulbs, except with a name brand that implies quality. | vl wrote: | I use https://www.1000bulbs.com/ because they have godzillion | bulbs in stock and it's possible to filter by CRI and color | temperature. I just get highest CRI in required color temp, | and it's good. More expensive, but well worth it. | michaelmrose wrote: | As far as I can see this doesn't even show you the CRI just | that its 90+ with limited reviews. | vl wrote: | Yeah, there is unfortunate need to click on each bulb and | read through specs. | | Some of the bulbs have exact CRI listed, and some have | "90+". I only buy the first kind. | 7speter wrote: | 95% of consumers are squeezed financially and can't afford | the nice bulbs. | kansface wrote: | I believe I tried to buy from them when I lived in SF, but | their bulbs were at that time (and possibly still today) | illegal in the state of California! I don't remember which | regulation it was, possibly one around efficiency or maybe | they needed to undergo some test. I think they even had a lab | somewhere on the peninsula, too... I was so angry at the | state of California for forcing me to have shit quality | lights that I gave thought to becoming an illegal bulb | runner. | unyttigfjelltol wrote: | And it's fascinating that with LEDs you can ask for a | specific wavelength of light ... and get it! | Thrymr wrote: | I think you're confusing LEDs with lasers. | susanasj wrote: | "cost optimization and general apathy towards the customer." | that's just this stage of capitalism unfortunately. Take an | airplane trip and you will experience similar effects. | taneq wrote: | Cost optimization IS the limits of the technology. All the nice | things you mention are the result of large amounts of work by | exceptional people. This costs money. Most of them require | higher-spec components, or more design time, or more | complicated fabrication and assembly. These things also cost | money. | | Nobody's denying you nice things at low prices just out of | spite. Nice things just cost more. To put a positive spin on | it, our innate sense of 'nice' is a well tuned heuristic for | good engineering (and/or whatever the Joneses can't afford). | marcellus23 wrote: | Are there companies out there creating premium LED bulbs | without these problems? | drorco wrote: | I'm no expert with LEDs' technical bits, but I purchased | LIFX bulbs which were pretty expensive and they've lasted | for almost a decade now. | jaywalk wrote: | I've had the opposite experience. I find that LIFX bulbs | fail far too often considering the price tag, however | I've yet to find anything else that can match up to them | when they work. So I just keep buying them. | throwuwu wrote: | Forget about premium, what the hell are impoverished people | supposed to do? | zaroth wrote: | Save on their electric bill with cheap LEDs that get the | job done, while worrying about more important things than | if the bulb flickers sometimes when you dim it? | throwuwu wrote: | Your answer is missing some steps involving money | zaroth wrote: | I suppose it depends on the extend of the impoverished- | ness. | | The homeless certainly aren't worried about lightbulbs | but the 65% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck | probably appreciate the savings. | bradstewart wrote: | Yes. Philips has and Waveform have pretty decent midrange | bulbs. Ketra has really, really high quality stuff. | mturmon wrote: | I fully agree, and would add that imposition of these | artificial limits seems to be a fundamental side-effect of | capitalism. | | "Good old-fashioned" incandescents were also subject to a | multi-decade scam to limit their lifetime: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel | | It's manifesting slightly differently this time around, but | it's the same principle. | eschneider wrote: | This seems like an excellent business opportunity. | Majromax wrote: | > This seems like an excellent business opportunity. | | Consumer education is rarely an excellent business | opportunity. | | Consumers are very good at comparing prices, and | "incandescent watt equivalent" labels provide an | understandable comparator for light output. Beyond that, the | statistics become much less meaningful. | | Consumers typically don't read colour temperature ratings (in | black-body Kelvin), but instead follow "warm white / soft | white / cool white" descriptors. Even still, it's common to | see homes with temperature-mismatched lighting. | | CRI is a step worse. It is a higher-is-better indicator, but | there's no intuitive connection for a consumer. Is a CRI of | 80 bad? Is 95 better enough to be worth double the price? | Worse yet, CRI is a summary statistic that can gloss over | less-measured color reproduction difficulties, and _worst_ | yet not all bulbs even publish CRI numbers on the box. My | local hardware store is happy to sell you its store-brand | generics, none of which have CRI numbers. | | Flicker is another step into the unknown. No bulbs that I'm | aware of publish flicker numbers, even the otherwise | respected names like Philips. If you consider this a | 'business opportunity', you're left with an unverifiable | claim that your bulbs are uniquely better than the | competition. | | Sadly, for now good LED lighting really is the domain of the | expensive professional or the hobbyist who spends their spare | time tracking down reviews or building custom lighting rigs. | eschneider wrote: | I expect the 'premium' light bulb market is similar to the | mechanical keyboard market. Good products and good prices | will find a small but dedicated market and build a good | rep. | | Do it right, and eventually your best customers will tell | their friends to 'just buy brand "X"' and you can expand | from there. | | Is this a good plan to take over the bulb market? No. But a | good product could be a nice, sustainable business. | scottyah wrote: | If you have two products where one lists a metric proudly | and the other doesn't, I think most consumers would choose | the one with the metric. | Majromax wrote: | Only if consumers understand the metric. Otherwise, one | product's metric is another product's meaningless | buzzword. | marcosdumay wrote: | What numbers do you expect to see for flicker? | Majromax wrote: | Ideally? Something like RMS and peak-to-peak amplitudes | below 120Hz and below 1kHz, when fed with good AC power. | The former would be potentially noticeable in peripheral | vision or with eye movement, and the latter could affect | filming, particularly with a rolling shutter. | marcosdumay wrote: | Oh, thanks. Those are indeed very good numbers to have. | DavidPeiffer wrote: | > Even still, it's common to see homes with temperature- | mismatched lighting. | | Maybe I'm hypersensitive to it, but I don't understand how | it's viewed as okay. I walked through a house on a home | show and despite being listed for 800k+ (in Iowa), they had | a couple mismatches. | eschneider wrote: | It's like a lot of things. Most people don't care, but | some people who care, care A LOT. | lukas099 wrote: | If you don't have a home heat pump, isn't incandescent actually | more efficient than LED in winter? Assuming you turn lights off | when you leave rooms, all generated heat will be concentrated in | the room you are actually in. | Cthulhu_ wrote: | > The two in my youngest son's bedroom went near dark not long | after I installed them. | | That's a warranty case; if people send them back to the producer | often enough, they have to up their quality. If enough people | also make sure to complain, consumer protection organizations may | start a class action lawsuit and/or get the federal whatsits to | demand better quality. | jryb wrote: | I don't understand any of this at all. I got the cheap 2700K LED | bulbs from a big box store (~$3 for a pack/bulb, I don't | remember) and they are wonderful, they're just as good as they | were when I got them, and the spectrum feels the same as an | incandescent bulb. I literally put no thought into the purchasing | process and it couldn't be more ideal. | tomtheelder wrote: | Agree completely. I bought a bunch of LED bulbs maybe a decade | ago to replace my incandescent ones. Lighting quality was | immediately better, and I have never had to replace a single | one. They have made multiple moves with me. Previously I was | replacing bulbs maybe annually, or every 2 years. | | I genuinely have no idea what people in this thread are talking | about. | jacobsenscott wrote: | No less that half my led can lights are unusable - either they | "burned out" (whatever that means for an led light, but they | did), or they flicker too much or buzz too loudly. I gave up on | replacing them and am just living with the ones that work. I | don't know where to buy good ones - the led market 99% scammers. | The crap at the big box hardware stores is not worth it. I've | probably spent more money in one year on defective leds lights | than I spent on incandescent bulbs in 40 years. | elihu wrote: | LEDs are sensitive to heat. It might be that recessed lighting | is causing your bulbs to overheat and fail early because they | don't have enough ventilation. | jacobsenscott wrote: | Maybe, but they are designed for this. I suppose given the | quality of the product that isn't saying much. | sarusso wrote: | IKEA is acting as Apple in this space IMO. They hide all the | details about their LED bulbs, but they are kind of the best you | can find on the market if you search for more details about their | tech, or at least AFAIK. | larsrc wrote: | I've started keeping the receipts and boxes and marking the bulbs | so I can get my money back under warranty if (when) they die | early. Make it not worth it for the companies to skimp on | quality. | stasmo wrote: | I've never had a problem with my Phillips Hue bulbs and I've | owned the same 4 bulbs for 5 years now. I've got them scheduled | to start brightening at sunset, change to a warmer colour closer | to bed time, then start dimming and warming up before bed time. | | If I want to feel more awake I ask Siri to change the colours of | the bulbs to white. If I went to go to bed earlier I ask Siri for | the colour tan and to dim the lights by 30%. | | At this point I can't imagine not having control over the colour | or brightness of my lights. These things are essential for a good | sleep. | timw4mail wrote: | There is a problem with LED lamps: they need their own power | supply to convert AC to DC. This is where a _lot_ of the issues | happen. Low quality filtering caps, or just circuit designs with | a lot of ripple lead to pulsing. When the filtering cap fails, | the bulb often does as well. | rootusrootus wrote: | For this reason I think that LED filament bulbs are the best | choice now. The cheap ones can have flicker issues, though. But | otherwise they're a nice step up from the last generation of | LED bulbs. | noduerme wrote: | > There ought to be a term for what happens when the light gets | weaker and everyone acts as if it's as strong as always. | | Cute. | alanbernstein wrote: | Of course, the incandescent bulb spectrum is different from the | sun's daylight spectrum. You can imagine people making similar | arguments 100+ years ago as the incandescent bulb grew in use. | | I wonder how much of this color quality complaint is due to | familiarity and comfort with what you grew up with? | | At the same time, I find fluorescent lighting unbearable over | long time periods, so I completely appreciate that these | differences can be important. | tzs wrote: | I'd guess that the arguments 100+ years ago over incandescent | bulbs would have compared them to candles, fireplaces, torches, | kerosene lamps, and whatever else people use when sunlight was | not available since that would be what incandescent bulbs would | be competing with. | dsfyu404ed wrote: | Remember back when texting and calling cost decent money? People | used to differentiate cell plans based on the amount you got. Now | it's a free unlimited or practically unlimited inclusion in just | about every mobile phone plan and people care about other things. | | The same thing happened to lighting. | | Back in "the day" nobody cared about light color or light | temperature. You bought whatever was cost effective for the | amount of light you needed. Nobody cared that sodium bulb | lighting was orange and that arc lamps were bright white. They | were the economically viable options for their use cases. | | Heck, nobody "liked" the florescent lights, especially the early | ones but they did the right job at the right price so they got | bought in droves. | | Now that we have LEDs for everything and the affording the amount | of light being scattered is not the primary hurdle anymore so | consumers suddenly care about using other performance metrics to | differentiate products. | hannob wrote: | Hi US people, european here. | | The EU forbid terribly inefficient light around a decade ago. | Yes, we had plenty of debates. Yes, people were concerned about | all kinds of things. Most of them were entirely made up, some | were exaggerated out of proportion. | | I can say that we still have lights, the debate mostly vanished | and no, it's not blue everywhere. | rootusrootus wrote: | Hello European, US guy here. | | > The EU forbid terribly inefficient light around a decade ago. | | So did we. Very few incandescent bulbs are on the market here | since they were basically banned a decade ago. There are some | niche options, you could still find expensive halogens, but | that's it. | righttoolforjob wrote: | Hi, also European here. Everything the article complains about | is true. The light from LEDs is significantly worse, even in | Europe. | tomtheelder wrote: | US here. Light quality in my house went up noticeably when I | switched to LEDs about a decade ago, probably due to having | way more/better options for color temperature. Haven't had to | replace a bulb since. I have zero clue what the author is | talking about. | flybrand wrote: | The claims don't match reality; the issue with so many products. | The failure mechanism always happens on the most difficult | dimension to prove - here it is longevity. | stevenkkim wrote: | I came across this article on HN recently: | | https://www.sevarg.net/2023/02/11/how-your-leds-are-killing-... | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34902429 | | After reading it, I realized that having overhead led lights in | our home were possibly contributing to my worsening sleep and | general tiredness over the past few years. Granted, we used 4100k | lights which are much bluer than 2700k. | | We swapped all our leds back to incandescents and halogens (which | were a bit tricky to find, but not impossible). Anecdotally, I've | been sleeping so much better since, finally feeling well rested | and far less stressed. I just feel a tremendous amount of relief | after not sleeping well for years. | | Also, while we had leds, I had to replace a surprising number of | them for burnout/failure, and also experienced flickering, | dimming issues, buzzing and more. | SamBam wrote: | > Granted, we used 4100k lights which are much bluer than | 2700k. | | You had this realization and yet still went the route of | switching back to all incandescents? | | It's trivially-easy to find 2700K LED bulbs. The ones I have | look just as good as the old incandescent. And despite the | article making it sound like you need a PhD to sort it out, you | don't: most medium-end 60W-equivalent, 2700K LED bulbs look | good and are easily available in any hardware store. | stevenkkim wrote: | The article says that even 2700k leds have a blue light spike | (albeit smaller than the 4100ks) since the led source is blue | light. | | Also, maybe it just in my head, but I think the light from | incandescents/halogens look nicer than leds... it feels more | natural. | gabereiser wrote: | The light temperature plays a lot into it. It's why those | industrial edison bulbs are so trendy and popular. The warmer | the light, the cozier at night. Warm being color and not | tempurature. 2700k being the ideal. | stevenkkim wrote: | Nice little rhyme, never heard that one. | | Yes, I think 2700k would have been better, we had originally | picked 4100k because we prefered the look. | | But the article says that even 2700k leds have a blue light | spike (albeit smaller than the 4100ks) since the led source | is blue light. | rssoconnor wrote: | I've set up Kelvin[1] to lower the colour temperature of my LED | bulbs in the evening, and reduce their brightness. In fact, | they end up pretty deep red when doing middle of the night | bathroom runs. | | [1]https://github.com/stefanwichmann/kelvin | stevenkkim wrote: | Interesting, thanks for sharing. I don't have any home | automation stuff, but good to know this exists. | mbtwl wrote: | Can't relate at all. Maybe it's regional. In EU conventional | light bulb have been phased out more than ten years ago. In the | first few years there were some crappy LED bulbs until | manufactures solved issues of basically completely new product. I | don't remember any LED bulb I ever bought breaking until now. And | ones I bought in last 5 years (when moving to a new place) also | have nice warm colour and don't flicker. Good bulbs used to be | around 5-10EUR per piece, now more due to inflation. But I don't | mind since they last forever. And way more efficient, wonder how | long it takes before cost is made up my savings in electricity | bill. | jmclnx wrote: | I have heard that newer LED Bulbs now have some kind of built in | obsolescence. This is from someone I know who is an engineer | working for the US military. | | I told him I had bought some LEDs (started moving over 2 years | ago) and that is when he mentioned that. I guess I will find out, | so far so good. | | I did stock up on 100 watt incandescent years ago and have a many | left just in case. I found LEDs cause me eye strain, but I | experimented and found if I use a Lamp Shade with a slight yellow | tinge, I can deal with them. | Jiocus wrote: | Traditional incandescent bulbs were not immune to planned | obsolescence, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel | | "The cartel lowered operational costs and worked to standardize | the life expectancy of light bulbs at 1,000 hours (down from | 2,500 hours).." | anjel wrote: | Planned obsolescence and fictitious durability scores are a | class action lawsuit waiting to happen | blakesterz wrote: | I'm finding this true with the bulbs I've bought in the past 5 | or so years. The first one I bought about 15 years ago is still | going, but most, if not all more recent LEDs have died. Even | the ones in the basement that are mounted with no case to | increase the heat around them. | | I read the "guarantee" when I buy new bulbs but who keeps | receipts or track of light bulbs? | smallerfish wrote: | You can write the install date (and store name) on the bulb | housing with a sharpie when you put it in the socket. It's | not a receipt but it at least gives you a shot at getting a | return when it fails early. | OJFord wrote: | You could also just write an arbitrary date and the name of | the most convenient shop when it fails, so I really don't | see what good that does, it's very far from a receipt. | fest wrote: | At the very least, it gives you an idea which receipt to | look for in your box of receipts/warranties. | | And no, I am not happy about having to think about | storing receipts for mundane things like light bulbs | either, but it is the only thing that calms down my | nerves when yet another bulb with 5 year warranty fails | in a year. | smallerfish wrote: | If you run a store, and a customer comes in and says "I | bought this item on $x date; I don't have the receipt but | this is how I know", you have two choices: | | a) you can choose not to trust them | | b) you can choose to trust them | | For a $3 item, most retailers would pick #b every time. | dpkirchner wrote: | I'm starting to suspect that it's not the LEDs themselves | that are failing but the transformer packed inside the base. | I haven't really dug in though. | | Are there any good brands of LED bulbs these days -- bulbs | that are likely to work as long as is claimed on the box? | I've already scratched GE and FEIT off the list. | JKCalhoun wrote: | Not exactly "the transformer", but yeah. See the afore- | mentioned videos by Big Clive on YouTube to find out how to | hack your bulbs to make them last indefinitely (albeit at a | reduced light output). | projektfu wrote: | I've read that it is the controller circuit which is | cheaply made. The LED would continue to work fine if the | current source hadn't failed. I had a lot of trouble with | GU10 LED lamps, finding ones that last as long as a | halogen. | Workaccount2 wrote: | They are almost certainly referring to the use of 85degC | capacitors. These are much cheaper and die quicker compared to | their pricier counterparts. | | It's not so much "planned obsolescence" as it is "consumers | shop on price primarily". And its even harder because there | really isn't much benefit to putting specs on your bulbs | because 99.9% of consumers won't understand them anyway. | | What should happen is a mandated "nutrition facts" that gets | put on all bulbs so people can familiarize themselves with a | standard fact sheet. | PoignardAzur wrote: | I think the european commission was considering something | like this with right-to-repair laws? Having a "durability | score" on the package, or something like that. | Majromax wrote: | > I have heard that newer LED Bulbs now have some kind of built | in obsolescence. This is from someone I know who is an engineer | working for the US military. | | BigClive covers this issue a fair amount on his Youtube | teardown videos. It's not exactly built-in obsolescence, so | much as being built to cost. | | The cheapest way to build an LED bulb is to minimize the number | of components. Instead of spreading the light emission out over | a couple of dozen LEDs, it's cheaper to use a handful of LEDs | but really overdrive them with high currents. | | The result is a bulb that's cheap to make, but in ordinary use | the chips and phosphors inside will run at high temperatures | and degrade much more quickly. This effect will be even more | pronounced with enclosed fixtures (like ceiling lights) that | have little to no ventilation. | | Manufacturers could design their way out of this by increasing | the component count (spreading the light generation over more | LED chips at lower current), but that's an expense that doesn't | translate well to a brand or marketing claim. As it stands, | ordinary consumers are unlikely to try to exercise their | warranty on a bulb that fails after 1,000 hours rather than a | rated 3,000 or so; there's no reason to expect that "this bulb | is more expensive but will last a really long time" would make | it in the consumer-facing market. | willidiots wrote: | Glad to see someone referencing BigClive's teardowns and | explanations. | | As for the business rationale, I think it's less about | consumer demand and more about the recurring revenue for the | light manufacturers. Products like this exist where mandated | - see his video on the Dubai LEDs - but aren't made broadly | available. | PoignardAzur wrote: | I think GP's explanation is compatible with "Products like | this exist where mandated". | | Even if the producer expects absolutely zero return | customers (and therefore no recurring revenue), having the | more durable product be more expensive, and durability | being hard to advertise, means there's a race to the bottom | where the more durable product is competed out of | existence. | | If _everybody_ is forced to make the durable product, the | race to the bottom disappears. | | (Alternatively, having better packaging regulations that | make it easier to identify long-lasting products would also | help) | nirvdrum wrote: | I tried to make a warranty claim since I had a whole batch of | bulbs die within a few months. GE required me to ship them | the bulbs. I abandoned the claim, switched to another | manufacturer, and don't put stock in those warranties at all | anymore. I doubt they get very many claims and surely someone | there is using that as proof of customer satisfaction. | righttoolforjob wrote: | > It's not exactly built-in obsolescence, so much as being | built to cost. | | How do you know this? Seems completely implausible. Source | please. | adrianmonk wrote: | > _in ordinary use the chips and phosphors inside will run at | high temperatures and degrade much more quickly. This effect | will be even more pronounced with enclosed fixtures (like | ceiling lights) that have little to no ventilation._ | | So, if I want bulbs that are less likely to fail, would it | help to always buy enclosure-rated ones, even for | applications where they're not going to be enclosed? It seems | like that could be a way to get the safety margin that | manufacturers aren't bothering with. | | > _unlikely to try to exercise their warranty_ | | I'm in this exact situation now, and it's because of the | hassle. You must take the bulbs back to the store. There are | various issues like waiting in line, and I haven't done it. I | bought name-brand bulbs thinking they'd be good, but now I'm | unhappy because the guarantee process is such a bother. | | I wonder if a company could make a viable product by | differentiating in this area. Make a truly no-cost, no-hassle | return process. Allow me to print a pre-paid shipping label | and just drop it in the mail. No in-person store visits, | waiting on hold for customer support, etc. And really push | this in marketing. Maybe even put some kind of hour meter on | the bulbs as a visible sign that I am buying the one brand of | LED bulb that takes reliability seriously. People might pay | more just to be spared from the headache of LED bulbs that | fail a lot. | szoszon wrote: | LED lights are unfortunately a big marketing scam. Remember when | they promised that the will last up to 20 years? Well, when I | renovated my house 5 years ago I installed LED lights over my | kitchen island - they were so bright that you couldn't look | directly at them and it was too hard to see somebody on the other | side of the island.. This is no longer true - they are visibly | dimmer. In a few more years they will probably have to be | replaced.. The problem is that since they don't use bulbs, I will | have to replace the whole fixture.. and the current lamps will | end up in the trash. We're not going to save our environment this | way. | bob1029 wrote: | I've trashed over 30 flush-mount LED lights in my house and its | 2018 construction. It wouldn't be so offensive if we didn't buy | into our own marketing bullshit so much. Pretending like 20 | years is a realistic timeframe for a semiconductor to survive | in that kind of environment is fantasy, but then you go about | constructing homes and businesses like it's true. | | This kind of scam is getting really old for me. LED lighting | isn't the only one being pushed on us. | davidy123 wrote: | I think LED lights will lose some of their brightness in the | short term, but maintain a useful plateau much longer. At | least, that's how LED projectors work, vs lamp projectors, | which steadily decline until they're unusable. | | However, I would always buy standard socket LEDs unless you're | really committed to that lighting style. | szoszon wrote: | Try explaining to your wife that this ugly lamp that uses a | regular bulb will be better for us in a long term :) | rootusrootus wrote: | OTOH, my original Cree retrofit can lights from about 2014 are | still going strong. They seem to have the electronics separate | from the LED itself which keeps the heat under control. I've | definitely noticed that some less expensive designs don't | bother with that, and it really lowers the longevity of the | fixture. | titzer wrote: | Not mentioned in the article are the LED replacements for full- | size fluorescent tubes (i.e. 48in tubes). I got a bunch for my | basement. The LED tubes really are a million times better than | the fluorescents. For one, they aren't enormous fragile glass | tubes filled with toxic mercury vapor, and two, they give off | good light (for a basement work area) with very little power. | strictnein wrote: | Interesting. I have some of those fluorescents in a storage | room and I hadn't even thought about there being an LED | replacement option. Thanks for posting that. | TheHypnotist wrote: | Can you place those bulbs in the regular fluorescent "socket"? | I bought a house and have a few burned out fluorescent looking | long bulbs and I don't want to replace them with toxic bulbs. | rootusrootus wrote: | Yes, but _check the bulb_. Some are compatible with the | fluorescent ballast, but some expect you to use a fixture | that has had the ballast removed. The trend is towards the | latter, because they are more efficient. | stasmo wrote: | A CFL ballast can be modified with a bypass by snipping a | couple of wires and tying them to other wires. It takes 10 | minutes and it's reversible. I did it myself after watching | a YouTube video. The LED t8 replacement was cheaper and | brighter and used less electricity. | caboteria wrote: | We've gone from incandescent bulbs that were shit because a | cartel[1] said so, to LED bulbs that are shit because we demand | that they be cheaper than they can reasonably be. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel | shanecleveland wrote: | I replace the standard size LED bulbs more than any other bulb. | Of all new bulbs in a new construction home from 2016, I do not | have any original standard size LED bulbs (mix of open, enclosed | and outdoor applications). | | I still have original incandescent bulbs, fluorescents and in- | ceiling LED can bulbs in place. I'm not sure what makes the | flood-style LED can bulbs so much better. I have not replaced a | single one indoors. Same mfr. as the standard size LED bulbs | (Fleir, sp?). I have not found a good brand of the standard size | LED replacement bulbs. | anoojb wrote: | Same story. Wondering if there's a truly resilient Standard 60W | LED bulb in the market at all, and if not why? | tomtheelder wrote: | I put LEDs in about 10 years ago and have never replaced one. I | used to have a big drawer full of incandescent ones because | they would fail pretty regularly | | I think there just might be more of a spectrum with LED bulbs, | since they are more complicated than incandescent ones. The | worst ones are much worse, but the best ones are far better. | blyry wrote: | Lightbulbs are infuriating now-a-days. I want poe-driven wired | IoT bulbs (and downlights, and I suppose zigbee/zwave where poe | can't be added in) that dim and color change on the white | spectrum (no rgb silliness I will never need to make my | lightbulbs green or purple or whatever), with no flicker and high | CRI / full spectrum. | | And a black box controller that matches output to exterior | conditions automatically. No app, just a black box with a wired | light sensor. | | You can rip my halogen reading lamps cold dead hands. | [deleted] | thayne wrote: | One thing that really, really annoys me, that isn't mentioned is | that practically all LED bulbs have a warning (in fine print) | that you shouldn't use them in enclosed spaces. If you do use | them in enclosed spaces some components overheat, and it | dramatically reduces the lifetime of the bulb. In my home, like | many, probably most, home in the area, most of the light fixtures | are enclosed. And finding bulbs designed to work in enclosed | spaces is practically impossible. | wiradikusuma wrote: | I don't finish reading the article because it seems the author is | very unlucky with LEDs, but LEDs really _that_ bad? | | You know that thing where you didn't notice anything wrong until | someone mention it and suddenly you notice it too? It doesn't | happen to me after reading the article. What should I pay | attention to my LED bulbs so I can be on the same page with the | author? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-03-30 23:00 UTC)