[HN Gopher] Own your work ___________________________________________________________________ Own your work Author : josem Score : 189 points Date : 2023-04-02 14:00 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (josem.co) (TXT) w3m dump (josem.co) | podviaznikov wrote: | love this. started to publish things on my personal site almost | 10 years ago http://podviaznikov.com. | | I changed publishing tools so many times, but all the content | still lives on the same domain name and I try to support same | URLs. | stuartjohnson12 wrote: | Read most of the content here. You have a soothingly simple and | brain-to-paper writing style I enjoy. Your essay called "Age of | Questions" stuck with me. It's a similar frustration to one | I've had with the world recently. | | https://podviaznikov.com/writings/age-of-questions | podviaznikov wrote: | what a compliment! | | I obviously cannot analyze my own style because that is my | style and how I write so reflection from other people are so | fascinating. | | And thank you for commenting on this specific essay. I've | just read it again and unfortunately it still holds, almost 2 | years since it was published. | | But I think I am starting to develop my own tools to work | against general tendencies at least in my personal life. I | will think more about it! | podviaznikov wrote: | and curious what you currently think on this topic too. | Specifically about solutions. At any level. Individual or | societal. | stuartjohnson12 wrote: | I liked the first half more than the second half. I think | you establish the problem very effectively, but in the | second half your own indignation shines brighter than | inquisition. | | I've yet to see an answer that satisfies me here. Many | times, inquisition is indeed used as a plausibly deniable | mask for ideology. Similarly, I don't think you or I will | ever reasonably be free of our own personal ideologies. | | If I had a good answer, the post wouldn't be interesting | to me. I could rattle off one of the common answers | (technocracy, degrowth, investment in education, | something something social media bad) but those seem | tired and wrong to me. This kind of topic is one where | it's easy to find the obvious target (this person, this | system, this policy, this organisation) and start | shunting blame, but that's ironically falling afoul of | the problem itself circularly. | | There's no solution I stand behind with enough confidence | to state it on a public forum like this. | | For now, I'll just have to keep asking questions. | podviaznikov wrote: | beautiful:) your answer is an essay in itself. | | I think I found a temporary shortcut/patch for myself | that I can apply on the personal level. | | If I see something outrageous online I bring it and | discuss in person with few people and we have more | nuanced conversation and I see that questions are asked | and it's not as crazy as online. | | And it calms be down and relaxes and gives me hope back. | Because old dynamics - of asking questions and having | nuanced conversations - they still work. | pfoof wrote: | I like your style of post titles: short, lowercase, concise | podviaznikov wrote: | thank you! | pfoof wrote: | That's what I do, because: too many to choose from, not enough | flexibility. And hosting anything with server-side rendering like | Wordpress does not bring too much benefits. | | Solution: Markdown in Git -> HTML -> Firebase Hosting over own | domain (easy to migrate and replace) | mark_l_watson wrote: | I mostly agree with the article. I use social media to promote | what is on my website, my books, etc. | | I do use Blogger though. Twice I have switched to self hosting on | my domain, and on my web site using Jeckal. Both times I switched | back for convenience. | Animats wrote: | "Own your own stuff" - Joan Jett's advice to new musicians. | LiquidPolymer wrote: | Also my advice to photographers just starting out. | dhosek wrote: | Blogspot has disabled a number of backend services so that it's | no longer compatible with, e.g., MarsEdit. I had one last blog I | was still updating on a blogspot site that I just moved over to | its own domain because of this. | thih9 wrote: | I did that. It was a pain. | | In my case most of engagement happened on social media, and I saw | little benefit from my website; so eventually I stopped updating | my webpage and started posting directly to social media | platforms. | japhyr wrote: | I'm writing on Substack now, because I really like the ecosystem | at this point. But I'm also well aware that they could tank it | like Medium did, or close up shop at any point. So I have a | recurring task in my issue tracker to make a full backup. One of | the reasons I'm willing to build on Substack at this point is | because of the ability to dump the most meaningful data - | subscribers and posts. | | That said, the dumped data is not in a format that can be just | uploaded to a different platform, or to my own site. That's not | an issue for me, because I can write a little code that will | transform the posts exactly how I need them for upload to a | different platform, or my own site. When I end up needing to do | this, I'll probably add custom styling that will look better than | Substack's anyway, particularly in reference to code blocks. | | I feel for nontechnical people. How do you decide where to invest | your time? What do you do when the platform shifts in a bad | direction, or closes entirely? AI tools will probably help a lot | of people in this situation, if they were good about maintaining | backups in the first place. I imagine "Can you convert my | Substack archive to a format that will work on x_new_platform" | would probably be a useful prompt. | shmde wrote: | Yes please. It's quite surprising to see a company like Netflix | and Airbnb using Medium for their tech blogs. They have the | world's best web engineering teams and they use Medium for their | tech blogs ? Just why ? I hate their font sizes their font | heights. Just looks so amateurish. | jmmv wrote: | I've gone through various iterations of my blog/site. I started | in LiveJournal back in the day, then moved to Blogger, and then | tested the waters with Medium. Eventually, I concluded the same | as the author: that I had to own my content in my own site, but | that it was OK to use other established platforms for | redistribution. And this is why I haven't jumped onto the | Substack bandwagon. | | I described the thought process I went through here: | https://jmmv.dev/2016/01/medium-experiment-wrapup.html and am | currently using Hugo to build my site. Granted, creating content | via Markdown is slightly more convoluted than using a web UI, but | the feeling of control and future-proofness I get cannot be | matched. | tete wrote: | Instead of a Wordpress Blog or something I'd go for something | static. There is a couple of software solutions out there from | everything to blogs to website. This has the benefit that you can | be a lot more independent. As long as you have some copy | somewhere you are fine. You can back it up easily and so on. If | you use WP (and MySQL) a lot more things can go wrong. If the | MySQL server, your wordpress can get hacked for some silly plugin | you thought you needed, the hoster of it or whatever are | unavailable you might lose it, you might lose your domain which | can break stuff, you might forget to pay, etc. | | The idea here is something that allows you quick recreation and | copying. You can just copy over static files. You can put it on | your Dropbox, Google Drive, etc. and even on your external hard | disk or whatever backup solution you use. | | Usually the main dynamic thing for writers is actually creating | posts. So if that is some offline software that just spits out | static files it becomes incredibly resilient. | | One might think static site generators, like Hugo, but there is | also GUI applications that essentially equal what the admin of a | blog or CMS see. | AndrewKemendo wrote: | What is old is new again | | This was basically the only option in the early 90s before | geocities etc... So most of us who were on the web in the 90s did | exactly that. Difference was, when you turned your computer off | for the night, your site was down | | If you were really fancy you had a dedicated T1 line, but those | were for rich people only | | I've been on my own domain for well over a decade and my CI | process hasn't changed from "drag and drop a .html file written | in notepad onto a BSD private-colo server via WinSCP" | | Literally never fails and my kb size pages don't crush anything. | whiplash451 wrote: | Come on. ssh and vim! ;) | alex_suzuki wrote: | I used to have a page on Geocities back in the 90s, wasn't it | just plain HTML, uploaded via FTP? Too long ago for me to | remember... | javajosh wrote: | It's clear enough who owns a speech, and like the OP I'm in favor | of hosting your own speeches (and essays). But who owns a | conversation? Does this rugged individualist approach to hosting | one's own work end the possibility of online discussion? Or do we | just hold our nose and do the hypocritical thing and host | comments - encouraging others to NOT own their work? | the_gipsy wrote: | Discussion is different from work. As you hint, there is no | good way to co-own a discussion. Either you do it on neutral | grounds and someone else owns it, or one party is the host and | owner. | thenerdhead wrote: | Everyone tends to give this advice of owning your own work | through a central location and syndicating everywhere else. In | other words, building your own platform. | | But generally speaking, sometimes you have to leverage platforms | that have the current attention of the world as that is where you | will drive engagement to your platform. It is fairly rare to just | win organic search traffic especially starting out so you have to | "hijack" some attention here and there where applicable. | | If you follow any notable person online who writes, creates | content, etc, they are not afraid of going where everyone else is | going whether that means they may have to be exclusive with their | creations for awhile or whether that platform allows them to | retain the rights to their creations. | | At the end of the day, it all helps them build an audience that | they can take anywhere and there's many possibilities depending | on what you'd like to do with that platform. | | Substack is that popular thing right now because it combines both | the content and email list ownership that you can then take | anywhere were it to go under tomorrow. It is a very accessible | way to "own your work" today, especially for those who don't want | to bother setting up a wordpress blog or similar. | jdthedisciple wrote: | I think POSSE [0] solves this. | | [0] https://indieweb.org/POSSE | thenerdhead wrote: | You have to tailor content for each platform archetype. | That's the only thing missing in this wiki. | avgcorrection wrote: | Come catch me at avgcorrection.name where I put a disclaimer on | the main page saying that my opinions are my own and don't | reflect the opinions of my current employer _nor_ any of my | previuos employers. | paxys wrote: | The underlying truth behind all such discussions is that too many | people focus on the mechanics of content hosting and delivery but | have nothing special to actually share. So they will spend all | their time engineering the perfect blog site from scratch or | moving from platform to platform looking for an ideological fit | while no one really cares about consuming any of their output. | | My advice is always to forget about the details and just write. | Set up a medium account, or substack, or blogspot, or get a VPS | and install Wordpress or Ghost, or just tweet out your article | line by line. If there is value in what you write then the | readers will be there. And they will follow you if you decide to | move your work elsewhere in the future. | breck wrote: | I must build static site compilers and markdown dialects so | that my children may have liberty to write prose and poetry. | lisp-pornstar wrote: | This, and also "The blog is about literate programming, and | the content of the blog is the code that produce the blog" | fsckboy wrote: | my blog is literary criticism of literate programming, and | so most of the content of my blog is also the code from | your blog. | pjot wrote: | For some the appeal _is_ the mechanics - it's fun to build | something and put it on the web even if it's only for yourself. | soneca wrote: | > _"If there is value in what you write then the readers will | be there"_ | | I don't think that's true anymore. Of course, it depends on how | you define "value", but I think having something "special" to | share not always attract readers. Controversial takes, click | bait, hate bait, exaggerated praising to a specific niche, all | of this works better than "value" in your writing to get | readers. Even if you stick to "value", you have to do it for | months or years to get readers. So consistency seems to be more | effective than said value too. | | I think that's similar to SEO. 5 to 10 years ago the common | advice was that you should just do white hat SEO because Google | would always catch you because they were so smart, thousands of | the smartest engineers on earth against your silly tricks. | Google would always won. But, now, it seems clear to me that | black and grey hat SEO beats Google most of the time. | enos_feedler wrote: | Part of the value in what is written is the author behind the | writing and our understanding of their life and experiences. | leviathant wrote: | I've been running a blog on a Perl/flatfile static site | generator (with MySQL bolted on later for search) since 1999. | Made a few tweaks over the years, but the core of the same. Had | lots of people over the years suggest better ways to run a | blog, but none of them were getting the traffic I got (well, | used to get), and none of their options are nearly as easy to | use. | | If you do use a third party, please regularly download backups | of your work. One of the reasons my blog was so popular was | because it also has an archive of articles that I shamelessly | copied from other sites (with attribution), most of which have | since gone defunct, their content otherwise lost. | pugets wrote: | In college, I did my calculus homework on blank printer paper | using Sharpie markers. I could only fit one integral per page, | maybe two if I was lucky, so I'd turn in these 15-page stapled | assignments. It was calculus all the same, and I got great | grades. I think the purpose of this comment is to reinforce | that the medium doesn't matter -- if you focus on the content | itself, you'll progress. | isomorph wrote: | Why did you do that? | alin23 wrote: | Yep, completely agree with this. I wrote about how I created my | blog workflow [1] so that I can write from my iPhone and easily | publish notes. And it's a lot of work that on Substack you get | for free. | | Also I can't say that I enjoyed tinkering with Go templates, | finicky file syncing etc. just for publishing some Markdown | text in a pretty package. | | If I had to do it again, I would choose Substack, and keep my | Markdown files backed up just like I do now. In the event of | having to switch, I can always just publish those files | elsewhere. | | And if Substack also supports custom domains, I would also use | that to avoid dead links. | | _There are cases where your own site is needed however: for | unique presentations like those on ciechanow.ski, for sites | where the visual look is a defining feature of what is | presented etc._ | | [1] | https://notes.alinpanaitiu.com/How%20I%20write%20this%20blog... | 0cf8612b2e1e wrote: | That video of you writing on the ipad was hilarious. | Definitely not what I was imagining. | alin23 wrote: | Heh thanks ^_^ that is the effect I was looking to convey. | You have to try it, it's a really satisfying way of | writing. Feels like handwriting but works 10 times faster | with less hand cramping | imadj wrote: | > while no one really cares about consuming any of their output | | Most people who blog don't aim to be influential writers. It's | more about self expression. | | > they will follow you if you decide to move your work | elsewhere in the future | | Except this almost never happens in the real world | torh wrote: | I host my own domain on my own server in my own home. It | obviously isn't the easiest option, but there are a lot of | options. I could pay a bit extra to Wordpress to get them to host | my blog with my own domain. Or I could host a Wordpress blog | somewhere else, or even just static HTML files. | | Actually I try to do both. I have started working on a static | hand made homepage in addition to my blog. But whatever the | approach, I still have to produce the actual content. Sometimes I | feel that is the hardest part. | defaultcompany wrote: | "You'll own everything, and it'll be yours forever." | | This is overstating it. You cannot "own" a domain name. Domains | are essentially rented and eventually (whether on purpose or by | accident) your domain name will expire. | asim wrote: | Say this to a non developer. This just isn't realistic for the | majority of people, nor do they care, or should they. What we | need is interoperability between services so that backups and | transfers are much easier. That isn't the case just yet. If we | moved to a more API first world then it would be very much | possible. With the advent of GPT related stuff it's clear we're | going that direction and the interface for everything is changing | too. So the concept of what is your website might fundamentally | change too. | CM30 wrote: | The best solution is what the Indieweb folks called POSSE: | Publish on your Own Site , Syndicate Elsewhere: | | https://indieweb.org/POSSE | | For instance, I might publish a clip on my own site first, then | mirror it to places like YouTube, TikTok and Reddit so more | people find it. Or post an article on my own site first, then | repost it on Medium and Substack (with a canonical saying my own | version is the original if possible). | | That way you're not tied to a specific platform, and can just | find another place to share/post your work if any of them go to | hell. | oh_yes_i_did wrote: | [flagged] | spansoa wrote: | +1 one for the POSSE technique. Assume all walled-gardened | platforms will be shut down eventually and only passion | projects like personal homepages remain intact. Although even | that's not a given. People just get tired and let the domain | expire or lose enthusiasm and let the project rot. Archive.org | might have your old site, but even that could go away given | enough time. Impermanence seems to be a feature of the web, | despite many saying it's a bug. | qudat wrote: | https://prose.sh employs this tactic. You control all the | source files and then upload them to use. You get to keep all | your content and you are welcome to host your site elsewhere. | 101008 wrote: | Is there an automatic way to do this? Like a SaaS where I paste | my article URL, chose where to replicate, and it does | automatically? Bonus points if it gets them from a feed. | yashap wrote: | Tools like Buffer or Hootsuite make it pretty easy to cross- | post content across many networks. | aminst wrote: | [dead] | nicbou wrote: | I own my work, but about 90% of my traffic comes from Google. | This is something I try not to think about too much. | DANmode wrote: | If it makes you feel any better, a more significant portion may | come from Bing/OpenAI's way soon. | SketchySeaBeast wrote: | Or it'll get even better at ingesting all their content and | providing the answers and points itself, never leading the | user to their site. | amatecha wrote: | Yeah, this strikes me as the end goal that Google, Bing, | etc. are working towards and envisioning. Why redirect | users elsewhere when we can just lock them into our AI- | generated "search engine"? "Reveal original source URL(s)" | will become a paid feature :) | revskill wrote: | When i write, i write a gist. | livelielife wrote: | this is a privilege. | | the closest to this most of us ever get, is the 'sense' of | ownership evoked by competent managers. | | notice that it is a 'sense of' ownership. not real ownership; | | anything that I create by myself, on my own, is not work; it's a | hobby, it's fun, like really good games. | | by this point I even think of work as all the other things I must | do to afford rent, food, electric bills, chores, etc. | twelvechairs wrote: | A case this week that underlines the importance or both self | hosting and also of archive.org is this weeks shutdown of | 'zippyshare' which was used by some mp3 blog sites. | | One particularly large one that shut down with zippyshare is | 'Holland tunnel drive' which has been captured by archive.org in | a couple of locations below. | | https://web.archive.org/web/20170711205314/http://hollandtun... | | https://archive.org/details/jillem-full-archive | | Many similar sites had gone through similar isssues with | shutdowns of megaupload and similar. Or being kicked off blogspot | etc. The ones that survive are generally self hosted. But few | older ones been archived on archive.org like this has. | Takennickname wrote: | List of reasons why this is very narrow minded: | | 1. You still own your work if you post it other places, just not | the platform. | | 2. You own the platform if you host it on a VPS, but not the | hardware. | | 3. You own the hardware if you host it at home, but still, only | license the software which runs it. | | 4. Many more. | | You want real advice? Ignore this guy, and just start. Most of | you people concerned on where you should start blogging/pocasting | don't even start because of all the choices and the fearmongering | (like this guy). | | Just write something and hit send. Not doing that is the only | guarantee of failure. Everything else is fixable. | bastawhiz wrote: | Exactly. Whether you control the underlying operating system | (or network connection) or just the content at the application | layer, you're still relying on someone else. If you don't have | good content to share, it's moot anyway. | | At the end of the day, any service trades control for | convenience/access. I run a podcast hosting service that's | slightly more expensive than hosting yourself with WordPress. | Paying me to host your show gets you a platform that's had | 99.999% uptime for years. You don't need to think about | renewing your domains or certificates or installing | WordPress/Apache/nginx/Ubuntu/whatever updates. You don't need | to think about how to get accurate analytics or filtering out | automated requests from your log data. You don't need to worry | about your show being protected by a single auth factor. If | your time is worth $60/hr and my service is $10/mo, is your | podcast taking more than two hours a year of your time (minus | hosting costs)? Some people don't want to make that tradeoff | and that's fine, but it's simply a better choice to find a | third party that you trust to do stuff for you. | iamben wrote: | Counterpoint - this is a bit like saying "sell the product from | your own website, you'll get 100% of the sales and own the | customer!" | | Totally true, but good luck getting the customer to your site. | Way easier to put your product on Amazon, eBay, Etsy, wherever | people are already shopping AS WELL - and take a hit on profit | (at least initially) and figure out how you build off that. | | Leverage all the social media and blog sites and substacks and | whatever that you can. Build a base and then figure it out from | there. | testcase_delta wrote: | I agree. I happen to sell the same things on my (pretty good!) | Shopify store as well as on Amazon. Amazon outsells about | 2000:1. The reason why is simple -- it's traffic. If you can | get traffic on your own, say with a giant social following or | TV presence, then owning your platform probably does make | sense. Otherwise go to where your customers are. It's like the | old retailers' saying: "Location, Location, Location." | RangerScience wrote: | Hmm! Are there any self-hosted things like Notion? This is good | for _finished_ work, but, notes and in-progress and etc...? | ashishb wrote: | https://Obsidian.md is great for that | cableshaft wrote: | And then you die, and you stop paying for your own web host, and | it all goes away anyway, more easily than if you had posted on | Medium or whatever (because if you're still alive you could keep | migrating/syndicating your data to other services if they go | under). | | That basically happened with James Mathe. He was the owner of | Minion Games, and he had an incredible tome of board game | publishing on Kickstarter advice on his blog. | | He died suddenly one day in 2019, and his self-hosted site went | under. You can still read it to a certain extent thanks to | archive.org[1], but as thankful as I am for archive.org, they | don't have the best user experience. | | Meanwhile if he had posted it on blogspot or on BoardGameGeek | (which supports user blogs), it'd still be fully available today. | | I think it's important to have a self-hosting solution, but I | think you also need an alternative. The POSSE solution mentioned | above would be better than only self-hosting. | | Ideally these websites would have better data preservation and | archiving processes, though, and too many just don't have | anything in place. Because you're just not going to be able to | convince everyone to host their own. | | I'd settle for automatic conversion to text-only archives, that | could be good enough while making the required space much more | miniscule. | | [1]: | https://web.archive.org/web/20190617212658/http://www.jamesm... | jmathai wrote: | For posterity, use a platform where you own your work. | | For broadcasting, use platforms you don't own but where people | are. | | Use one or both depending on your goals. | 79a6ed87 wrote: | Even though I agree, there will always be things that we don't | own. | | I'm developing my blog in Svelte, and I trust that (despite being | kind of a niche framework) it will last for long. But if it gets | abandoned by its developers then I'll have a problem. | | The only way for me to own everything on it would be to do | develop as much as I can by myself, like quit using Sass and | Svelte in favor of plain CSS and vanilla JS, and also self-host | it instead of relying on a VPS. And that's not even mentioning | the dependencies of the API, which is made in Rust and its less | mature ecosystem | | I think that the path to software preservation is a long long | road | [deleted] | SrslyJosh wrote: | > Imagine a billionaire buying one of the main social media | services and some things not going as expected. | | If you thought that Musk was going to be beneficial for Twitter | in any way, you were deluding yourself about him. Tesla and | SpaceX were only successful because competent people did all the | thinking and spent a lot of time managing upwards. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-04-02 23:00 UTC)