[HN Gopher] An Essay on Diseases Incidental to Literary and Sede... ___________________________________________________________________ An Essay on Diseases Incidental to Literary and Sedentary Persons (1768) Author : Vigier Score : 50 points Date : 2023-04-03 03:42 UTC (19 hours ago) (HTM) web link (publicdomainreview.org) (TXT) w3m dump (publicdomainreview.org) | chaibiker wrote: | Thank you so much, working on this issue, but didn't expect a | reference this far back! | | If curious, on the latest in sitting, standing, perching, | alternating, a good overview recently from University of | Waterloo: https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-of-research-expertise-for- | the-pr... | cryptonector wrote: | Use the gym. Do it twice a week at least. Learn how to use the | gym. Get a trainer for a while so you learn. Get a good | chiropractor who can guide you as to what parts of your body | need the most work. | j_french wrote: | Solid advice, apart from the chiropractor. By all means | engage a physiotherapist / physical therapist, but not a | chiropractor. In my experience it's all spine spine spine | with those people. | asdfman123 wrote: | The most useful health advice is to get cardio and strength | training in and eat real foods. | | Everything else is a hyperoptimization. Some hyperoptimizations | are marginally useful, some aren't actually useful at all. | | Humans were built to eat real food, and they were built to use | their bodies. | chaibiker wrote: | Reducing average sitting bout length has as big an impact as | exercise. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-021-00547-y | dangwhy wrote: | > In this Review, we make a case for an approach to | preventing and managing cardiovascular disease that | involves 'sitting less and moving more'. | | Its not just 'Reducing average sitting bout length ' though | right ? | | Also this seems like self reported observational studies? | chaibiker wrote: | Right, both exercise and sitting bout length | independently are important. You just can't completely | exercise away the impact of sitting alone. | JoelMcCracken wrote: | "cormorant of books" what a great metaphor (unless I | misunderstand something there); I think I'll use this myself in | the future. | bigmattystyles wrote: | The typography that makes their lowercase 's' look like 'f' is | interesting. Makes you read to yourself but with a lisp. | retrac wrote: | Yes the long S [1]. Not used at the end of a word. It's the | origin of the German Ss, which is visually a long S with a | short s after. Increasingly often just written as ss, with some | German dialects officially doing away with ss. Words like | "possess" in English used to be written pretty much (visually) | like possess or possess. | | [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_s | morkalork wrote: | Am I crazy in reading that the change was spurred by | technological advancement (introduction of the printing | press)? | retrac wrote: | That shouldn't be too surprising. The technology used | deeply influences writing. In the Latin alphabet, the upper | case forms developed from the forms of letters used in | stone and metal, with monumental carvings. While lowercase | evolved from the kind of writing done with pen or brush on | parchment or papyrus. Unsurprisingly, there are a lot more | straight lines amenable to carving into stone in the upper | case letters. | | As I understand it, printed f and long S looked very much | alike, and the usual tweaks in handwriting to make it clear | weren't really easy in print. So they just dropped it | altogether. One less letter required in the typeface, too. | codersfocus wrote: | The origins of the Latin alphabet are interesting too: | miners in Egypt who didn't want to learn all the | hieroglyphics decided to start using some of them | phonetically, creating an alphabet | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Sinaitic_script | TylerE wrote: | True classical latin didn't have lower case. Initial | letters were written marginally larger, but what we'd now | (mostly) think of as uppercase is what all the letters | looked like. | teddyh wrote: | That's called "Small caps": | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_caps | kmill wrote: | It's also the origin of the integral sign! (Mentioned on the | Wikipedia article.) There's a nice accidental parallel | between sigma notation (the discrete, "angular" summation) | and integral notation (the continuous, "smooth" summation). | | Another s fact is that Greek has lower case s and | additionally the variant s that only appears at the ends of | words, which is very Latin-s-like. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-04-03 23:00 UTC)