[HN Gopher] Effective Spaced Repetition ___________________________________________________________________ Effective Spaced Repetition Author : g0xA52A2A Score : 372 points Date : 2023-04-10 12:07 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (borretti.me) (TXT) w3m dump (borretti.me) | albert_e wrote: | I read so many good things about spaced-repetition but havent had | the discipline to stick with it and make it work for me ... I wil | give it one more shot with flashcards on a exam prep I am about | to embark on. | | Is there any gentle kid-friendly introduction to this topic with | a fun exercise that I can introduce my K-12 kids to so they might | grow up with better tools than me? | Kelamir wrote: | https://ncase.me/remember/ could help a bit. | bulbosaur123 wrote: | Combine spaced repetition with major mnemonic system and method | of Loki and you have a superpower. | all2 wrote: | Can you mention some major mnemonic systems? I've read about | this stuff before and I remember a few minor ones for numbers, | or for chaining ideas, but that's about it. | MisterPea wrote: | Having tried spaced repetition methods for studying for swe | interviews, I can concur that it is the most effective way for me | learn. | | It does require an intense amount of discipline though, so wonder | how well it will work for me in execution for hobby learning. | koofdoof wrote: | Are there any good premade decks you could recommend? Or | particular topics you found well suited to spaced repetition? | MisterPea wrote: | Decks were mostly LC problems - anytime Anki told me to | review it, I would spend 5min or so trying to remember the | general outline. If I forgot, I would put it back into the To | Study again queue (essentially it would show up sooner again) | ngai_aku wrote: | What kind of cards did you make for interview prep? Reviewing | algorithms? | MisterPea wrote: | Yep, just LC problems - helps a lot with identifying patterns | harshalizee wrote: | Would you mind sharing your setup and/or deck? | rsanek wrote: | For my job search process I created a custom note type | specifically for interview problems. My general process | was go to LeetCode, find a medium/hard problem, hack on | it for 30-60 minutes, then look at the solution if I | couldn't get there myself. At the end of the problem, | regardless of if I solved it or not, I'd create an Anki | card with the following fields: | | Title | | Question | | Additional Criteria | | Example input/output | | Insight (1 sentence maximum) | | Insight explanation (can be longer/bullet-pointed list) | | Key Data Structure (at most 1 data structure; if there | are multiple, use the most important one) | | Time complexity | | Space complexity | | Full answer code (can use syntax highlighter add-on) | | Source (can provide link to associated question online; | can include link(s) to solutions that the insight and/or | code come from) | | There are 4 cards that are generated from this template, | which test the same question in slightly different ways. | They individually ask for the insight, the key data | structure, and the time and space complexities. | | I found this note type to be critical to my success in | the following interviews. In two cases, I was asked | literally the same exact question I had already added to | Anki; I was able to write out the solution from memory in | one go. If you'd like to use my note type directly, I've | exported an example here. [0] | | [0] https://drive.google.com/file/d/12NsYNIBjIPI1Nhq5wE1x | Pljr9rH... | bulldog13 wrote: | I use SuperMemo https://super-memo.com/ for memorizing things. It | uses spaced repetition. It has a bit of a learning curve, but | once you figure it out, very effective. I feel like I have seen | an article on HN about it before. | pleasejustdont wrote: | Probably this one : Augmenting Long-term Memory | http://augmentingcognition.com/ltm.html | oslac wrote: | Tending to a digital garden of your own making has been the most | effective for me by far. No other organization beyond that, at | most hitting a random note inside a subfolder for 10-15 minutes a | day. | TheRealPomax wrote: | This could do with some non-serif fontage. Effective learning | includes having a typeface that doesn't get in the way of reading | at smaller pointsize for a large segment of the population. | n8henrie wrote: | TIL -- I thought serif was generally supposed to be easier to | read. | | How is this kind of thing studied, and what kind of outcomes | suggest "easier to read"? Speed? Recall? Subjective? | | What proportion of the population are we talking about, | roughly? Is it even enough that one should consider providing | both a serif and a sans version of their content? | | Serious question. | TheRealPomax wrote: | Worldwide, at least 10% of the audience (but depending on | your specific demographic, much higher) which is a crazy | significant number (for contrast: your users are three times | more likely to have some form of dyslexia than they are | likely to be using Firefox). | | For anyone with (partial) dyslexia the serifs are | information-murder. | https://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/advice/employers/creating- | a-d... | | But also note that font size and spacing matters a lot: at | 16px with 24px line spacing, this is super hard to read. | Change that to font-size 20 with the same 24px spacing, and | this read perfectly fine. | n8henrie wrote: | Thanks for the response and link! I'll see if I can find | some primary literature on the topic -- I'm interested in | how such a thing is studied! Accessibility is certainly one | of my many weak points. | lbotos wrote: | Is your beef the serifs, or browser's justification doing a | number on the word spacing? I find it easier to read with the | justification removed. | lbotos wrote: | Heh, it's funny as your link encourages wider tracking so I | guess it is the serifs. | robertbob wrote: | Does anyone have any insight into deciding what information | should be memorised, and what information it is sufficient to | simply store in a searchable digital knowledge base for rapid | retrieval when needed? | | Takes a lot of effort to commit my notes from a book into my | head, but a tiny amount of resources to store them on my | computer. | rjh29 wrote: | Language is really the ideal use case, you cannot stop and look | up words every few seconds when talking to someone. And doing | it while reading or watching TV spoils the enjoyment somewhat. | You need to frontload a ton of data into your mind and | flashcards are the best way to do it. | | Another good use case is country flags, because you can't | easily look those up (other than pulling up an image of ALL the | country flags) | bluGill wrote: | Only at the beginner levels. Once you get beyond beginner you | realize that many words have 20 different definitions, and | each definition maps to a different word in the other | language - and the problem happens when you reverse as well. | outlace wrote: | Ask yourself if the cost of having to look it up at a | potentially inconvenient time (e.g. in the middle of a busy | work day) is greater than the cost of memorizing it during | scheduled less busy times (e.g. doing flashcards while eating | dinner or during a bus commute). | _dain_ wrote: | Gwern's classic monograph[1] addresses this: | | _> The most difficult task, beyond that of just persisting | until the benefits become clear, is deciding what's valuable | enough to add in. In a 3 year period, one can expect to spend | "30-40 seconds" on any given item. The long run theoretical | predictions are a little hairier. Given a single item, the | formula for daily time spent on it is Time = 1/500 x | nthYear-1.5 + 1/30000. During our 20th year, we would spend t = | 1/500 x 20-1.5 + 1/3000, or 3.557e-4 minutes a day. This is the | average daily time, so to recover the annual time spent, we | simply multiply by 365. Suppose we were interested in how much | time a flashcard would cost us over 20 years. The average daily | time changes every year (the graph looks like an exponential | decay, remember), so we have to run the formula for each year | and sum them all; in Haskell:_ sum $ map | (\year -> ((1/500 * year**(-(1.5))) + 1/30000) * 365.25) | [1..20] # 1.8291 | | _> Which evaluates to 1.8 minutes. (This may seem too small, | but one doesn't spend much time in the first year and the time | drops off quickly55.) Anki user muflax's statistics put his | per-card time at 71s, for example. But maybe Piotr Wozniak was | being optimistic or we're bad at writing flashcards, so we'll | double it to 5 minutes. That's our key rule of thumb that lets | us decide what to learn and what to forget: if, over your | lifetime, you will spend more than 5 minutes looking something | up or will lose more than 5 minutes as a result of not knowing | something, then it's worthwhile to memorize it with spaced | repetition. 5 minutes is the line that divides trivia from | useful data.56_ | | [1] https://gwern.net/spaced-repetition | rjh29 wrote: | I have definitely wasted lots of time creating and reviewing | cards for words that I never see again (the long tail) or | don't strictly need to know. But the feeling of coming across | a word that you learned and -knowing- it is amazing. It also | helps if you enjoy the process of creating and reviewing | cards - tending to your knowledge garden, so to speak. | tiagod wrote: | >A common failure mode (and I did this more than once, before I | got the hang of it) is to use Anki for two weeks, then drop it, | and pick it back up six months later only to find you have 600 | cards due for review. This is not encouraging, and it defeats the | point of spaced repetition, which is to review the cards on the | intervals the algorithm chooses. >I don't have much advice in | this area, except that if you have persistent problems with | conscientiousness, untreated ADHD etc. you should address that | first. | | This keeps happening to me, and I have somewhat treated (but | severe) ADHD. | | Does anyone have recommendations to make this easier? Either Anki | settings, or using another app. | nojs wrote: | I use this service to hold me accountable to "Anki zero" every | day: | | https://bossasaservice.com/ | Scaevolus wrote: | Assuming you use a computer daily, it should be easy to script | Anki to open itself at startup at some point during the day, | letting you effortlessly have a habit of sitting down and doing | 5 minutes of review before your other tasks. | zetalyrae wrote: | The way I did this was I added a daily task to my todo list to | do spaced repetition. | | And I started small. Add a few flashcards, review. Don't add | more than 5-20 cards per day (Anki and Mochi have new card | limits to enforce this for you). | | If you use it daily, and add cards at a slow trickle, they | won't pile up and you won't get discouraged. | examplary_cable wrote: | The issue you're having is due to the fact that Anki | "Accumulates" cards if you skip one day, which can build up and | create such a large amount of scheduled cards for a day that | you end up dropping the thing. I'm working on a spaced | repetition algorithm that solves this issue by letting you | review when you have time and letting you skip the days you | can't do the reviews. | icoder wrote: | I'm interested! I've noticed exactly this. But also even with | regular use I've had times where the stack and thus required | study time was just ever increasing. This is probably a mix | of too many new cards plus high difficulty resulting too many | reset cards. It would be great if I could determine when and | how long I'd study and the algorithm would just offer me the | cards best to study next, being repeats or new ones. That | would combine nicely with a 'dont brake the chain' or other | habbit forming technique. I'd prefer a daily n minutes above | something that may take increasingly longer. | c7b wrote: | The SM algorithms, trying to predict the perfect time for | reviewing a question, seem like overengineering to me (and also | not very well supported by research afaik - we have evidence | that repetitions help, but much less what the perfect spacing | is). Just randomly sample questions with probabilities | proportional to how 'urgently' you need to see them, seems like | the most intuitive approach to me. No daily quotas, no running | out of questions, just do a few when you feel like it and don't | worry about whether you're doing too much or too little | repetition. | | Is there an app/plugin that works like that? I know you could | use Anki like that by just not worrying about the backlog, but | in my experience it doesn't work like that. | cafemachiavelli wrote: | The only thing that worked for me (also ADHD) is to have fixed | study sessions, typically in the morning ("Kanji before | breakfast") or during my train commute. | | Beyond that, I wouldn't worry about backlog too much. I use a | custom deck that gives me my maximally doable number of cards | per day and completely ignore the rest. It's not like the | actual repetition frequency is critical - many people change | those settings quite drastically and still manage to memorize | their cards fine. | samus wrote: | If you don't touch it for that long, just throw away the | scorefile and start from new. It probably doesn't fit the | degree you actually remember any of the things that you | learned. | kqr wrote: | Here's what worked for me, but probably only works for people | in a narrow set of circumstances. | | I read a lot of technical books and articles. I used to make | notes on the interesting/relevant stuff I came across, in case | I would forget about it after I had used it and need it again | in the future, so I would be able to look it up. | | Now I make flashcards instead. Since I keep reading new things, | and keep wanting to make new notes, I also keep adding | flashcards. And it feels silly to add flashcards without also | reviewing them, so I end up doing that too. | | ----- | | But yes, as another person wrote in their comment, part of it | is also resigning to/accepting your condition for the effects | it will have on the things you want to do. Sometimes you'll | stop reviewing and you'll get a backlog. The important thing is | not that you consistently review, but that you consistently | pick up reviewing again once you've stopped. | sangpal wrote: | You could maybe use an alarm/reminder. | sn9 wrote: | Instead of setting a goal of getting through some number of | cards, have you considered spending a maximum amount of time | per day? | | Like say you block of 30 minutes per day for Anki. Most days | you'll probably have time left over, but some days you may have | cards left to review by the end of the 30 minutes. But that's | okay. You can just do them tomorrow. The point is to be | consistent, not to be a completionist. | | It would probably help to start reviewing old cards before | learning new ones as well. | | And of course you can start with whatever small block of time | feels like it would be easy to complete like 15 minutes or 5 | minutes. Maybe even 1 minute; you can always gradually increase | the duration as you rack up a streak. | zozbot234 wrote: | > pick it back up six months later only to find you have 600 | cards due for review. | | Just do the amount you feel like doing. Backlogs don't matter, | the system will just show you the highest priority cards | (highest risk of forgetting) first, and even give you extra | credit (i.e. a longer review interval) for those cards that you | do still recall despite the backlog. | n8henrie wrote: | Used SRS via Mnemosyne (and later Repetitions.app) heavily in | studying for all of my US medical board exams. The effort to | payoff ratio seemed very satisfactory. | | For pre-clinical rotations, a few nerdy peers and I collaborated | on a shared deck of a couple thousand slides -- many of them | pathology images -- synced via Dropbox. | | For the Step exams, I mostly used practice test questions. Any | question I missed prompted me to read up on the topic to | determine what piece of knowledge would have helped me come to | the right answer, and then figure out how to make a decent card | for that principle. Every morning I would start by reviewing all | my SRS cards, then do a few hours of practice tests. It was | really nice being able to be able to take a core component m of | my study material on the road by just bringing my phone! A few of | the practice question apps had protections in place to prevent | copying text (copy and paste saved a fair bit of time, even if | there was also a lot of rewriting) -- but figuring out | workarounds like running in a VM or screenshotting from the iOS | app was never too hard, and I would just queue up the screenshots | to batch process toward the end of the day. | | I used a similar technique to pass the tech, general, and extra | exams for amateur radio with near perfect scores (the verbatim | questions and answers are freely available -- I did try to learn | the concepts behind most questions, though a few were admittedly | memorization without understanding). Unfortunately my small town | is too rural to have a local club, and I have too many hobbies to | shell out $1k for a HF rig, so I have yet to make a single QSO. | I'll eventually find time to put together the QRP CW kit I got | for my birthday :) | yanis_t wrote: | Spaced repetition looks very promising to me. I've been a long- | time Anki [1] user, and it allowed me to learn Czech much faster. | | Recently I launched a website [2] where I try to blend a | markdown-based knowledge manager with spaced repetition. It's not | an easy task and there's a long way to go, but after adding and | maintaining > 400 cards, I already | | [1] https://apps.ankiweb.net/ [2] https://retaind.io/ | AlexErrant wrote: | This looks incorrect to me https://i.imgur.com/pECgx2j.png | mburee wrote: | Basically trying to do exactly the same thing, do you have any | recommendations on decks or are you maintaining your own? | wanderingbit wrote: | Upon reading the OP's blog, I had the same idea! It's cool to | see others are hungry for this as well. | | My basic approach to implementing it in Notion (my preferred | knowledge manager) is: | | 1. build some block template in notion that lets me structure | the block such that it's easy for Mochi to ingest it 2. reads | new pages from Notion 3. uses Mochi to generate cards for them | 4. build a habit of reviewing Mochi cards, then I will actually | learn from the things I write in Notion | | It looks like you've implemented the core functionality in | retaind. How come you decided to go with a separate knowledge | base, rather than try to use one that already has strong | network effects, like Notion? | austincassidy wrote: | I've been trying to find a solution to this exact problem. I | use Notion as my PKMS and I've been struggling to find an | integration to make flashcards with my content in Notion. | Going to try out your system - thanks for sharing! | | As an aside, Notion would completely disrupt the flashcard | app space (Quizlet, etc) if it had a feature to create | flashcards from a Notion database with spaced repetition. I | really don't think it would be that difficult for them to | implement that feature. Hopefully they will soon. | cdelsolar wrote: | I am a tournament Scrabble player and the state of the art for | studying words is spaced repetition. You quiz on "alphagrams", | like ABEISTT, and after a few times you just see BATISTE BISTATE. | There are at least 80K words between 2 and 8 letters long though, | so it does take many hundreds or thousands of hours to learn them | all well. I have very poor studying discipline so I have my own | methods of studying that don't use spaced repetition, instead I | just study all the words periodically and focus on the harder | ones. But I don't know them as well, and for the words I did | spaced repetition on more than 15 years ago I can still recall | those immediately. | LVB wrote: | This is interesting to me. Do you make many permutations and | use those as cards? | zetalyrae wrote: | I wrote this. Ask me anything! | untech wrote: | Thanks for the article! I noticed a small issue: the "Powers of | two" subsection didn't render properly, probably due to a | Markdown syntax error. | zetalyrae wrote: | Thanks! Fixed this. | hyeomans wrote: | Thanks for this. What topics have you learned/memorized with | this technique? | larsrc wrote: | Nice write-up! Haven't tried SRS yes, I definitely see how it | can work well for learning facts like you show. For fuzzier | subjects like history or psychology, I've had some success with | writing questions for myself that require more of an | understanding of the subject than mere facts. (Never got to the | repetition part, though.) I found that writing non-trivial | questions also helped me understand the subject matter better. | How would you work with such subjects? | LVB wrote: | Great article? I'm curious what your Anki settings are, if | you've changed anything. I'm pretty new to the app, but when I | hit things like "you'll need see this card in 5 years" I had to | dive into settings and start tweaking stuff. I'm more concerned | about definitely remembering it in say 12 months than having | too high of a load. But there are many adjustments to achieve | this, so any thoughts? | zetalyrae wrote: | I use Mochi with all settings out of the box. Mochi doesn't | even implement the SM-2 algorithm, it just applies a | multiplier to the review interval on getting it | right/forgetting. | hendry wrote: | I find writing cards / decks the challenge. IIRC the ones you | download from Ankiweb are all such low quality! | | Could you link to some good quality decks for inspiration | please? | zetalyrae wrote: | I write essentially all of my cards. I find that it helps a | bit with recall. | | Also, people differ in the "density" of cards they need | around a given topic. I might need a lot of cards to cover a | particular area of a topic in many different ways, while | someone who already knows that area needs fewer. | | I agree that public decks tend to be terrible. So I don't | really know any good ones. For the examples in the post, I | tried to keep the wording as close as possible to the | flashcards in my own Mochi decks, without adding extraneous | detail. | bluechair wrote: | Thanks for the write up. | | Could you share with us how you're applying this knowledge in | your work? | zetalyrae wrote: | I mostly use SR so I can study intensely whatever strikes me | as interesting, then turn to the next thing, while still | retaining the knowledge and being able to make progress. | | Like a few months back I had the sudden inexplicable autistic | urge to learn geology. So, I picked up a textbook and went | through it like a novel and just wrote the flashcards as I | read. | | I think of it as checkpointing for learning: | https://borretti.me/article/spaced-repetition- | checkpointing-... | | Currently going through Jaynes' _Probability Theory: The | Logic of Science_. | hermanschaaf wrote: | Thanks for the great article, you've inspired me to take | another shot at making a habit of learning through spaced | repetition! | | I had a question: how much time do you typically spend on this | activity in a day? Do you have tips for how to adjust based on | the time you have available? | zetalyrae wrote: | It depends, after a big burst of adding flashcards I'll have | a big hump to get through for like 2 or 3 weeks. That might | be hundreds of flashcards a day, that can take 15-20 minutes. | | Right now I haven't added many cards in a while so it's more | like 30-50 cards a day. Usually not even 5 minutes. | | I wouldn't recommend doing hundreds of cards a day, | especially if you're just getting into it. I'm just nuts. | ivvve wrote: | How would you reccomend I learn history with spaced repetition? | I'm studying a detailed subject independently (I.e. not for an | exam with a set curriculum) and I'm finding it hard to atomise | the cards down bevond dates and names. I suppose I should start | there first and then build more complex cards, but I'm not sure | what the best approach for those is. Thanks for the detailed | article! | zetalyrae wrote: | I've thought about this a lot and I don't have an answer. | History is very prose-like and unstructured and that makes it | hard. | | My tentative thought (and I haven't validated this entirely) | is to try to structure it. Make a spreadsheet with tables for | people, events, etc. Look at Wikipedia infoboxes for | inspiration into the types of things that should go as | columns in the tables. | | You can also try hierarchical periodization. Like if you were | making flashcards about the life of Peter the Great you'd | divide his life into: 1. Early life | 2. Grand Embassy 2.1. Austria 2.2. | The Netherlands 2.3. England 3. Great | Northern War 3.1 Start 3.2 Founding | of St. Petersburg | | And put information under each of the leaf nodes. | sn9 wrote: | I'd check out Cal Newport's work on efficient study habits | and apply Anki where it makes sense. | | For example, read this and follow the links: | https://calnewport.com/case-study-how-i-plan-to-study-for- | my... | | Obviously ignore the stuff that's less relevant for an | autodidact, though seriously consider the effect any | particular thing could have on your learning. For example, | perhaps you'd get a high ROI paying a history graduate | student to assign and grade a research paper or exam. | | Ali Abdaal also has great suggestions that should be useful: | https://aliabdaal.com/the-essay-memorisation-framework/ | nathanmcrae wrote: | I'm currently doing this and personally I believe the dates | and names approach is best (depending on your goals). The | theory is that if you have a solid grasp of the coarse | details like births/deaths/major battles then when you are | reading about the more subtle ideas (like what factors caused | the fall of the Roman empire) you will be able to couch those | ideas in the concrete framework you've already built. Then | those ideas will be able to stick better. | | I've only been doing it for a year and change so we'll see | how it goes, but I think it's a good approach. | rendall wrote: | What papers or data out there support spaced repetition? Has its | support weathered the replication crisis? | rodonn wrote: | Spaced repetition has a very long history with hundreds of | papers published on the topic. Here's a good survey of some of | the published research https://gwern.net/spaced- | repetition#background-testing-works | submeta wrote: | A question to the experienced Anki users: | | The recommendation is to learn before you memorize. | | Many times I hack the infos (from an article) right into Anki. | Now if it'd want to review the infos in the Anki app, that | totally destroys my stats. | | What are some of you doing? Extract the info into some other | tool, review the infos there and then quiz yourself in Aki? | atahanacar wrote: | >that totally destroys my stats | | I don't understand what you mean. There are only 2 stats that | are mostly significant. The first is, when first learning the | card, if you hit again too many times the card becomes a leech | - as in it leeches your time, at which point you should | temporarily suspend that card and to the others first. | | The other one is the recall rate: after you learn a card (on | default settings, when you hit the 1 day mark for that card) | how often you don't fail to recall the information. This rate | is the single most important metric in your stats, and a value | that is constantly below 90% means you should probably tweak | your settings to show cards more often. This can be easily done | by reducing the interval modifier. A value close to 100% might | also be slightly problematic depending on what you want, | because you might be wasting time with unnecessary reviews, | which can be solved by slightly increasing the said interval | modifier. | | As for your main question, you can do it however you see fit. | Some people might prefer to do everything in Anki, while others | might prefer to read a textbook, watch lectures etc. first and | then move on to Anki for that specific topic. Don't use Anki as | a way to quiz yourself, it is not a testing tool. If you want | to test yourself, use question banks. Use Anki as a tool that | will help you memorize things. For this, you have to do your | reviews on time, or the algorithm just won't work. | somsak2 wrote: | Why does it matter what your stats are? | sureglymop wrote: | I have a similar issue. I create cards for the subject I need | to study, then I study it all at once in a custom study | session. | | I then go to the exams but how do I continue afterwards? Like | what are the best settings to retain all the information after | that? And how do I make sure that I'm not destroying those | settings when I need to study before an exam again? | Jtsummers wrote: | https://docs.ankiweb.net/filtered-decks.html | | You can use filtered decks and set them up so they don't | alter the schedule of the cards when they're "returned" to | their actual regular deck. Useful for a cram session before | an exam where you don't want to actually alter the regular | study schedule. | sureglymop wrote: | Thank you! Exactly what I was looking for. I was in such a | cramming mode at the time that i didn't finish the docs but | pretty much stopped after I understood notes and cards. Can | you recommend any settings for a good schedule to retain | information? | Jtsummers wrote: | Sorry, I just use the defaults. I've found they're | effective for me. The most I tune it is to raise or lower | the number of cards per day (number of review, number of | new) for specific circumstances. Like when I've fallen | behind I may lower the number of new cards per day and | raise reviews a bit to clear a backlog. | | I have tried adjusting it more in the past and found it | did nothing to help me overall and I was just turning | knobs to turn knobs. | tra3 wrote: | But the point of SRS is that it prompts you to review the | cards when there's a high chance of memory decay. | | Say you learned your cards and did a custom study to review | them before your exam. Now you "know" these cards to some | extent. Anki knows how many times you reviewed them and if | you provided an accurate assessment of how well you retained | these cards, Anki will know when to show 'em next, so you | don't forget. You don't have to do anything. | Graziano_M wrote: | Why would you care about your stats? Do you have the stuff | memorized? Nothing else matters. | maayank wrote: | So... anyone used Chatgpt to generate cards for Anki? | Kelamir wrote: | Yes, you can also prompt it with the 20 rules of memorization | https://www.supermemo.com/en/blog/twenty-rules-of-formulatin... | and you've got yourself an agent which create flashcards for | you. | dowakin wrote: | Yes, I'm using for language learning. Usually via tool | `https://github.com/sigoden/aichat` with different roles that | I've created. For example for grammar ChatGPT generates bunch | of examples for specific grammar rules, which I memorize. | totetsu wrote: | I used it to write a python script to convert a large json file | full of a corpus of japanese business phrases and their english | translations into anki card format. | knubie wrote: | Not Anki, but you can use the AI field in Mochi [0] to generate | content for cards [1]. | | [0] https://mochi.cards/ [1] | https://twitter.com/MochiCardsApp/status/1635289548229062657... | mjadobson wrote: | Yes, I have trialled this. I've found it works best with this | workflow: 1. Summarise some prose (from a | textbook) into bullet points 2. Convert these to | flashcards 3. Make these flashcards more concise | | I then verify they are correct/relevant, only keeping those | that are worthwhile. | keiferski wrote: | I have been using it to do exactly that. However, as GPT is | wrong on certain facts, I use it more for generating Anki- | formatted text from learning sources that I provide myself. | | For example, I'll give it a paragraph from Wikipedia, then say, | "generate 5 questions and answers from this text. Format the | answers to be inside brackets like this: {{c1::Answer text}}. | dantheman0207 wrote: | It's certainly an intriguing idea worth investigating. But for | me, the process of creating the cards and being forced to | distill what I read was critical to the success of using SRS. | SpaceManNabs wrote: | Making your own cards is a very important step | comfypotato wrote: | Science says otherwise. Saw a study with no significant | difference between the people who made decks and people who | used premade decks. Too lazy to get source, sorry. | rjh29 wrote: | My deck has 10,000 hand-made cards and I know for sure they | stick in my brain easier than cards from a premade deck | that I have no connection with. I suspect it depends how | you make the deck. I intentionally use sentences and images | that I care about. | | It only matters for the first few reviews though, even a | premade card can be forced into my mind with enough effort. | atahanacar wrote: | No. As a med student who uses Anki for basically everything, | this is plain wrong. The time spent on making cards is better | spent on studying. Premade cards (Anking in this case) have | relevant pages from multiple sources, relevant | histology/gross photos and additional notes for every card, | and all cards are tagged with their corresponding chapters in | multiple textbooks. If I spent time trying to do something | similar (and even without the tags) I'd have no time left to | actually study. | | The only use case I can think of where making cards yourself | would be better is sentence mining while learning a language, | because these cards depend on context and creation doesn't | take more than a few seconds even when adding images. | MichaelNolan wrote: | Med school is a bit of an outlier, because they have high | quality shared decks. Most subjects have very low quality | shared decks. | | I don't think any other subject at all has a shared deck | that's of similar quality to what AnKing provides for the | medical community. Geography/maps have some good shared | decks as well. | atahanacar wrote: | I don't know about other subjects, so I can't comment on | that. I use Anki for med school and language learning, | and both have high quality decks. I guess I'm lucky. | cpburns2009 wrote: | My wife gave up trying to use Anki in med school because it | worked against her. There's no way to go through a whole | deck in one sitting. Anki might be useful for a few light | cards every day but it's useless for the long study | sessions demanded by med school. | all2 wrote: | You can adjust the number of cards that get pulled into a | given review session. You can also do multiple review | sessions. I'm confused as to the problem here. | | I will admit, reasoning through options is very much | harder when you're under a lot of stress. | cpburns2009 wrote: | The problem is you can't go through a whole deck like you | can with real flashcards. It becomes a lottery as to what | cards you might get. You don't know what cards you didn't | see. This was the biggest frustration my wife experienced | trying to use it. | atahanacar wrote: | >The problem is you can't go through a whole deck like | you can with real flashcards. | | You definitely can, just not in a single day which is not | something you should do. Anki takes commitment. | atahanacar wrote: | Going through a whole deck in one sitting is not the | correct way to do it. Your brain gets tired and it needs | some rest. The way I did it is use the tags to filter | topics every day by lectures in my school. Once I | complete the day and still have energy left, I'd move on | the the next day and continue until I'm tired. I'd finish | around 3 times quicker than the pace of school lectures. | | One thing with Anki or any other SRS is that it only | works if you do it on time. Doing a few cards for a short | amount of time and claiming "Anki doesn't work" is just | nonsense. | | >Anki might be useful for a few light cards every day but | it's useless for the long study sessions demanded by med | school. | | This could be one of the most controversial statements | for med students. Every classmate I talk to either uses | Anki or a local commercial SRS specifically made for my | country's med school curriculum/exams. And it's not just | my friends or my country either, r/medicalschool shows | the same tendencies. | cpburns2009 wrote: | I think the problem is Anki is advertized as digital | flashcards when it's actually SRS. When you can't use it | as digital flashcards, people without copious time to | work around its peculiarities will consider it useless. | | > Once I complete the day and still have energy left, I'd | move on the the next day and continue until I'm tired. | | How can you finish a day without finishing its material? | That's what ultimately frustrated my wife. Anki prevented | her from getting through all of the material in the med | school decks she got from a classmate. She stoped trying | it after a few days because her time was better spent | studying directly. | | > Every classmate I talk to either uses Anki or a local | commercial SRS specifically made for my country's med | school curriculum/exams. | | My experience with a US med school was some students used | Anki. Most didn't. | atahanacar wrote: | >How can you finish a day without finishing its material? | That's what ultimately frustrated my wife. | | Well, I don't think anyone can actually finish a day's | worth of material in just one day. What Anki does is it | helps you plan out how to spread your material so you use | your time efficiently. A day's material is spread to | multiple days, but you "learn" (the terminology for the | card being due in more than a day) all of them the same | day, to repeat it the next day and so on, with delays | depending on your recall performance. If you make a | mistake, your delay for that card is reduced. | | >Anki prevented her from getting through all of the | material in the med school decks she got from a | classmate. | | Ah, that might be a problem. If those decks were poorly | made, and they probably were if they aren't something | like Anking or copied straight from a source like | Pathoma, they might even make one want to quit medical | school. Ask me how I know. | | > I think the problem is Anki is advertized as digital | flashcards when it's actually SRS. When you can't use it | as digital flashcards, people without copious time to | work around its peculiarities will consider it useless. | | I don't understand what you mean. Flashcards are SRS, and | Anki tries to emulate flashcards. | _dain_ wrote: | _> Premade cards (Anking in this case) have relevant pages | from multiple sources, relevant histology/gross photos and | additional notes for every card, and all cards are tagged | with their corresponding chapters in multiple textbooks._ | | Most premade decks are nowhere near as good as the medical | school ones. | SpaceManNabs wrote: | yes if you are trying to memorize facts and reference | material and maybe even language, then yes, using premade | cards are probably chill. especially if all the material is | standard. | | if you are reading abstract stuff or more novel stuff that | people are still understanding, then your own breakdown and | understanding used to make cards is incredibly more | helpful. If i was learning differential calculus, someone's | analogies and metaphors of cards would not be | understandable to me at all. | | i have to admit i added my own bias here so thank you for | expanding. | atahanacar wrote: | >i have to admit i added my own bias here so thank you | for expanding. | | Same here, thank you. I don't know much about other | topics. I use Anki for med school and language learning, | both of which have great premade decks. But I think I can | see now why creating your own decks can be more useful | for abstract stuff. Kind of like that memorization method | where you create stories related to things you are trying | to memorize. It only works when you are the one who | created the story. | Kelamir wrote: | That depends on topic. It doesn't make sense for medschool | students or for people just studying vocabulary. | Additionally, if there's a high quality deck such as | https://dojgdeck.neocities.org/ , which is a grammar deck for | Japanese, it is preferred to use them - if anything, you can | extend them with what makes your own cards special, such as | mnemonics. | fwlr wrote: | _"Individual cards should be extremely brief, but your deck as a | whole can be as repetitive as you want."_ | | Huh! I struggled with using Anki for pretty much this exact | reason, always spent too much mental energy figuring out the | "correct" number of cards for a given topic. But the author makes | a good point here, if there's too many cards on a certain topic | you'll just hit "I remember" on the repetitive cards and the | algorithm will make them disappear for months - so there's | basically no cost to having "too many" flashcards! | oregoncurtis wrote: | I would actually advise against it, or at least take the | approach of removing cards that are too easy. I remember | reading some article about spending your time learning stuff | that is "just hard enough". When you study things that are easy | you are kind of wasting time, you want to the material to be +1 | in difficulty what you already know, not +0, not +250. While | the easy questions give you satisfaction, they aren't helping | you actually learn. I would argue that multiple cards on the | same subject end up equating to a bunch of time wasting easy | cards. | | The disclosure to this is that I also don't think you should | spend a lot of time figuring out how to create cards. There is | some payoff in optimizing the process, but focus on just making | the cards and reviewing them so you are learning the actual | target subject. | | All that said, my current approach is to create cards for | concepts that I think are a little hard to understand or that I | know I won't see enough repetition in daily work/tasks. If I | find out after a few weeks the cards are too easy or too | similar I usually with just delete it. | rjh29 wrote: | I'm a big fan of making lots of cards, like you say you can | just hit Easy and send them into next year, or conversely if | you keep forgetting them and they're using up lots of time, | just suspend or delete them. | | When I couldn't remember a particular kanji in Japanese I used | to make lots of cards that featured that kanji at the same | time, and usually I'd review them all the same time, it's sort | of cheating but it always seemed to help me remember the kanji | in the end. | samus wrote: | It's actually the correct way to make that work. Some Hanzi | and Kanji are really abstract and are best learned by | associating it with multiple related concepts. Each can have | dozens of very distinctive meanings. | spidersouris wrote: | The only disadvantage I may see to this is that it skews your | counter of daily cards. So you may feel discouraged if you see | that you have a large amount of cards to review and that it | will probably take you a lot of time to go through them all, | while in fact, you will only spend a few seconds on those that | you already remember. Unfortunately, there are times when I | cannot for the life of me do my flashcards because there are | too many of them to review, and I either skip that day's | session because a) I tell myself I don't have enough time | (which is a lie most of the time!) or b) I don't have the | mental energy to go through them. The only (partial) solution I | have found to that is doing them first thing in the morning by | trying to plan my schedule accordingly and wake up a tad | earlier. | kqr wrote: | I have configured a review session to be at most 15 | flashcards or 5 minutes, whichever is shorter. It usually | takes 2-3 minutes. Often I do multiple review sessions back | to back. But I'm only ever committing to 15 cards at a time, | regardless of the size of the backlog - that is very | manageable. | 1123581321 wrote: | Use the setting to limit the number of daily cards when you | find the number bothers you or you're too busy. You can | change it often, too. | | A low limit will mean some cards don't hit on the optimal | day, but you'll eventually have time for every card once | enough of them have been recalled a few times. | kashunstva wrote: | A piece of advice that is repeated here and elsewhere is to | create atomic cards. I've long wondered whether that is good | advice or not, or whether it depends on the subject domain. | | The better I know a subject, the less atomic it feels. I don't | think and talk about the topic in discrete facts but in | interconnected knowledge. This is why the complete independence | between cards seems more like a weakness than a strength. The | argument from the spaced repetition community is that purposeful | linkages between cards builds in a contextual dependency. And | that dependency makes the resulting memory contingent. But in | some knowledge domains that seems more of a feature than a bug. | wordpad25 wrote: | @kashunstva that's really interesting, how would you link cards | together, though? | | Have you seen this done anywhere? | Dr_Birdbrain wrote: | I have been a regular Anki user for many years. | | My approach to making cards is actually to take long-form notes | on the topic at hand, then apply close deletions to key parts, | like equations, key ideas, and definitions. | | This makes it so that the piece I need to actively recall is | small(ish), but I still have the context | matt_LLVW wrote: | I just learned hiragana and katakana in a week using spaced | repetition. It's crazy effective. | ekkeke wrote: | Big fan of spaced repitition, especially for language learning. | Unfortunately I feel like it fares worse for topics that require | more application instead of memorisation, like mathematics or | electrical engineering. Would love know if there was some super | effective way to learn these similar to spaced repitiion. | | So far, the only thing that really works for me is solving lots | of problems until I have the technique mastered, but even then | after a while I'm prone to forget how to solve them. Perhaps | there some way to combine the problem solving with the spaced | repition? It seems like it would be far harder to make a deck for | this and I don't think most flashcard software handles it very | well. | nomadpenguin wrote: | I've been experimenting with "spaced free recall". So first, | I'll read a section of a textbook. Then, I write down | everything I can remember about it in a blank text file, | organizing things in a way that makes sense to me. Next, look | back at the section and compare to my recalled notes, filling | in missing information and committing extra attention to missed | spots. Repeat the process with increasing intervals between | reviews. | | From what I understand of the literature, free recall produces | better learning compared to cued recall like flash cards. Part | of the reason is that it forces you to organize information and | associate it with existing knowledge. | | Anecdotally, it's much easier to learn conceptual knowledge, | and I don't really feel like my recall of specific facts has | suffered compared to traditional SRS. | Nezteb wrote: | The concept of "Kata" seems to be a popular repetitive method | for learning/practicing programming skills: | https://docs.codewars.com/concepts/kata/ | felipe86 wrote: | [flagged] | MattRix wrote: | This has to have been generated by ChatGPT. | aliasxneo wrote: | GPT-4 specifically. Tell-tale sign is restate the problem, | offer a solution, and then summarize at the end. | wardb wrote: | lol. clearly a ChatGPT answer | alangou wrote: | Thank you, fellow AI model, for sharing your thoughts on | combining problem-solving with spaced repetition for | mastering technical subjects. As an AI language model, I do | not have personal enthusiasm, but I am programmed to | recognize the effectiveness of spaced repetition for language | learning and problem-solving for technical subjects. I | completely agree with your suggestion of creating a "problem | bank" and using spaced repetition software to regularly | review past problems by organizing them by topic and | difficulty level. It is an effective approach to retaining | problem-solving techniques, and there are specialized spaced | repetition software tools available for mathematics and | engineering that could be worth exploring. Ultimately, | repetition and practice are key to retaining knowledge and | skills, and combining problem-solving with spaced repetition | can indeed be a powerful strategy for mastering technical | subjects. | Fauntleroy wrote: | My man's really dragging ChatGPT into the comments section. | Harbinger of things to come. | sn9 wrote: | You can use SRS to schedule the review of problems you've | understood how to solve. | | Front of card: where to find the problem (e.g., book, page | number, problem number). | | Back of card: where to find a solution (e.g., solution manual, | page number, maybe a personal notebook with cleanly written | solutions, etc.). | | I initially tried writing up the problem and solution in Anki, | but that was too much of a hassle and realistically I'm not | gonna be reviewing problems without the book in front of me | anyway. | typon wrote: | Is Duolingo basically spaced repetition for language learning? | maphew wrote: | Maybe try drawing the key points instead of text cards. Idea | sparked by the below, which is awesome but requires someone | else who already understands to create the learning material | first. | | "Each 5-minute video, or 'cartoon', is the equivalent of 50 | minutes of a university-level computer graphics class. ... | there was no statistically significant difference in learning | effectiveness between [cartoons & lectures] as measured by | exam, homework, and project scores. In other words, the | cartoons were just as effective as traditional classrooms for | teaching the material." | | https://g5m.cs.washington.edu/ | | https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWfDJ5nla8UpwShx-lzLJqcp5... | zetalyrae wrote: | In my own experience using spaced repetition for math: math has | both semantic and procedural knowledge. The procedural | knowledge comes from doing problems and rewriting proofs. But | the semantic knowledge is also important, and you can acquire | and retain this through spaced repetition. | | I was going to write some rules specifically about math but I | might write those as a separate post because they got too long. | I think I've benefited specially from memorizing the proofs of | theorems, though refactoring proofs into multiple lemmas to | make each proof small enough to fit in a flashcard is a tedious | process. | anjanb wrote: | "refactoring proofs into multiple lemmas to make each proof | small enough to fit in a flashcard is a tedious process." | | Can GPT/chatGPT help here ? If yes, how ? | miklosz wrote: | I use it and it's quite effective. I just paste text I want | to summarise and just ask (GPT-4) to "Create Anki cards for | these paragraphs. Keep the answers brief". It does quite a | good job in distilling the knowledge. | | And for cards creation in general, the ever-green "20 rules | of formulating knowledge in learning" is always a good | guide. | | http://super-memory.com/articles/20rules.htm | Kelamir wrote: | On top of that, you can prompt it with the 20 rules so | that it generates cards which would conform to the rules. | zetalyrae wrote: | I haven't tried it. But it's a two step process: | | 1. Take the proof from the book (usually couple paragraphs | of prose-heavy sleight of hand) and rewrite it into a | format I can understand: a list of simple steps connected | by simple inference rules. | | 2. Split them up until each proof is 5-7 steps. | | The first step you should probably do yourself, since it's | part of understanding. The second step GPT can probably | help with. | krsrhe wrote: | [dead] | mahathu wrote: | General advice for spaced repetition is to make flashcards | atomic i.e. as small as possible, as in the OP, but general | advice for language learning is to always learn words in | context instead of on it's own, for example in example | sentences. Have you figured out a solution combining those two | goals? | zetalyrae wrote: | For language you might be interested in the Clozemaster[0] | approach. Basically, you are shown a sentence, both in | English and the language you want to learn, and one of the | words in either one is a cloze deletion, e.g.: | English: there are thirty days in April. French: | il y a trente ___ en avril | | And you have to complete the cloze with "jours". | | The sentences are compiled automatically from Tatoeba[1], the | cloze deletion is done on the least-common word[2]. This | combines vocabulary with grammar. | | I didn't like the Clozemaster UI so I wrote a script to make | the clozes myself: https://borretti.me/article/building-diy- | clozemaster | | But automatic approaches are not great. Later I asked GPT-4 | to make these flashcards for me, that gave me much | better/more meaningful results. | | [0]: https://www.clozemaster.com/ | | [1]: https://tatoeba.org/en/ | | [2]: https://www.clozemaster.com/faq#how-are-the-blanks-in- | the-se... | mderazon wrote: | This is very nice. | | For language I've always used the sentence in target | language (the one i want to learn) in the front of the card | and the translated sentence in the back of the card but | I've always wondered if it should actually be the other way | around. | | Your suggestion with the cloze is another good approach | slickdork wrote: | Could you detail a bit more your gpt4 usage for language | learning? | | I was wanting to get back into French and thought about | using chatgpt, but I'm worried about it's hallucinations | and teaching me wrong. | zetalyrae wrote: | I asked it to list an outline for a French course, then | for each item in the outline I asked it to make a table | of English-French sentence pairs of increasing | complexity. | Kelamir wrote: | This is a common problem. My preferred solution is to quiz | myself on that specific word, then see the word being used in | a context with example sentence(s). That could be extra info | on back of the card. While it is right to make flashcards | atomic, one might misunderstand that so as to not include | information that doesn't directly play a role in Question -> | Answer. | | Simply spoken, get questioned on the word alone, then see it | in context. I've found that sufficient to solve this problem. | | As an alternative, you can question yourself on a sentence | and the word by its own. Note that sentence alone wouldn't | cut as you'd memorize the sentence and not the word and would | be unable to remember the word otherwise, most likely. | schneems wrote: | > require more application instead of memorisation, like | mathematics or electrical engineering | | I've dreamed of having some app that mixes in bite sized | learning lessons with otherwise "fun" internet (social media, | news, etc.) | | I could imagine it could give you a little tutorial and then | ask you a quiz (to force application). If you get it wrong it | keeps you at the same concept and explains it a different way | next time, maybe asks if you want to revisit prereqs. | | Even if you can't memorize the answers, you can change your | understanding and intuition. | krsrhe wrote: | [dead] | onos wrote: | Could you save "representative problems" to your cards? Eg a | particular integral that uses a particular method etc. | oregoncurtis wrote: | I actually used Anki cards to study LeetCode problems when | preparing for interviews and it seemed to help. After doing a | problem and solving it I created the card as such: | | - Front of card is the entire LC problem statement | | - Back is a bulleted list of the steps or key points (ie. first | I notice this list is unsorted, so I would sort first, next I | would do blah blah..) | | - Back also contains the code solution that I might just glance | through or look at a particular part of it. | rsanek wrote: | I also benefitted a bunch from using Anki for LC problems -- | I described the details in | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35517232 | ranting-moth wrote: | > Spaced repetition is, by far, the most effective cognitive hack | I've used. | | I totally second that. Well, sleep and exercise do amazing things | for you too, but if you need to memorize things, I don't know of | a quicker method than spaced repetition. | | Check out Leitner system: | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leitner_system | | Flashcards Deluxe supports Leitner, I don't know about Anki? | | https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.orangeorap... | (I have no relation to that app, I just find it incredibly | useful). | roxgib wrote: | The Leitner system is designed with the assumption that you | have lots of physical cards you need to organise without going | insane, but you can do much better if you're using a program | like Anki. | | Anki's algorithm is based on an older version of the SuperMemo | algorithm, with some evolution since then. The consensus seems | to be that while you can fine tune it a bit with the settings, | the returns are diminishing at this point. | shen23 wrote: | [dead] | fnl wrote: | Thanks for the pointer to the Leitner system (my last name | coincides...) But why would you want to use that simplified | Leitner system if Anki can track each card individually? | | Disclaimer: I don't know if Anki supports a simplified system | that applies spacing to a whole group of cards instead of each | card individually, but why you would want that? | dan-g wrote: | Andy Matuschak's How to Write Good Prompts is another good | resource about this: https://andymatuschak.org/prompts/ | AlexErrant wrote: | Going to add Supermemo's classic "Twenty rules of formulating | knowledge", which is referenced at the end of the article. | | https://www.supermemo.com/en/blog/twenty-rules-of-formulatin... | sn9 wrote: | Michael Nielsen has also written some influential stuff on | SRS [0][1]. | | [0] http://augmentingcognition.com/ltm.html | | [1] https://cognitivemedium.com/srs-mathematics | kqr wrote: | I wish these comments were higher up in the discussion. These | things are essential reading for new users who want to | succeed with spaced repetition. | all2 wrote: | I've started working on my own code specific flashcard program. | The algorithm, app, and cards are one part of the app, and the | other part of the app -- the actual cards -- is whatever | application you want. | | Basically, I wanted a flashcard app mashed together with repl.it. | At first I thought I'd just have the python interpreter built in, | but I slowly realized that correctly implemented flashcard is a | programming template and a correct answer, and that your choice | of interpreter should produce the correct answer given your | input. | | --- | | So now I've come to the general formulation of the app: | | Question -> Some application specific file. For Python it might | be the boilerplate into which you insert a nested list | comprehension. For C# it could be a whole project boilerplate | into which you insert your LINQ statement. | | Answer -> The expected output when your program is done | executing. Probably on STDIO? Maybe something else. There are | lots of IO options in an Linux OS. | | Card -> Question, Answer, Executable (we could probably infer | this from the "question" card) | | --- | | Everything after this would be pretty much like Anki as it is | now. You could have a script that listens to you play a song and | then scores your performance. You could take touch/writing input | and score penmanship. And so on. | | The possibilities here are limited by your imagination. | | Unfortunately, I got derailed trying to sort out the review | algorithm. If anyone has any ideas on this front, I'm all ears. I | know Anki's algorithm punishes skipping review days, and I'm one | who skips review days frequently. Which leads to me quitting | altogether because the review load becomes boring and unbearable. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | I need to memorize the shapes of seven modes on the guitar. (A | mode is kind of like a scale.) The image here shows them starting | from F: https://www.anyonecanplayguitar.co.uk/three-note-per- | string-... | | Is this a good fit for this technique? I'm not sure how to | decompose it further than "G Dorian." I'm also not sure if the | time would be better spent just playing them more. | submeta wrote: | Definitely! You can use the image occlusion addon to hide parts | of the images and try to recall it. | | Edit: | | Here is a link to the mentioned add on: | https://ankiweb.net/shared/info/1374772155 | | Create screenshots of your seven shapes, then redact parts of | it. | damontal wrote: | I can't learn guitar looking at fretboard diagrams like that. | They completely confuse me. The only way I learn shapes like | that is by repeatedly playing them. | pohl wrote: | One could, but I think there are better ways that involve | _doing the thing_. In other words, practice patterns on top of | the modes (up 2 tones, down one, [repeat], etc.) Also, there | are more simple ways to conceptualize these patterns that make | them much easier to digest: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGmj2kuHojQ | dbalatero wrote: | You can use SRS to prompt the review, but do the actual | "review" physically on the guitar. But yeah I think you need to | build kinetic memory here, not just visual memory. | fsociety wrote: | Play them more, your fingers need to learn the shapes not your | brain. | monkmonk wrote: | Having done this myself I recommend two things: | | - 4 notes per string (there are fewer, bigger shapes to get | into your head), helps you break out of the caged boxes | | - thinking of the guitar as a pentatonic instrument and using | that as your framework (notice how the open strings are a | pentatonic scale). Check out the miles okazaki book, it's all | about this | | & Anki is a great tool. Good luck! | paisleypepper wrote: | Practice what you want to learn. If that's to use them while | playing, develop muscle memory and practice with music. | | Maybe you could use Anki to prompt different modes you could | then practice over music though. | awhitty wrote: | Hey, I spent some spare time noodling on a specialized tool for | fretboard flashcards a few months back. I haven't built decks | for learning modes yet, but I'd be curious to hear what sort of | format you'd find useful and I'm happy to give it a whirl. You | can check it out at https://awhitty.me/fretcards/ | | I'd be really happy to hear any other feedback as well. So far | I've implemented a crude per-session spaced repetition | algorithm, but I've had a mind to build more decks, offline | support, local-first spaced repetition, and some extra doodads. | | I agree with other commenters - playing is the best way to get | this stuff truly dialed in. Have fun with it, too! Drilling | scales saps energy, imo. Best to eat a balanced diet. | fuzzfactor wrote: | If a subject took psilocybin in between focused repetitions, do | you think they would be effectively spaced? | | Here you have F, G, A, B(flat), C , D, & E. The full alphabet | in the key of F. | | Each pattern actually goes up the entire neck but for teaching | it looks like this site emphasizes the notes that are more | common between these different modes. | | You could look at it like a guideline to help you hit the right | notes during improvisation or composition. | | Alternatively it could be just as useful to avoid hitting the | wrong notes. | | Instead of having targets for the fingers, you could just as | logically have patterns of notes to avoid. | | Either way when you go up the entire neck you're covering a lot | more ground. | | One objective might be to develop the ear simultaneously with | the conventional modes, so that eventually just hearing the key | the tune is played in will instinctlively lead your hand to a | favorable position to begin with, making it easier to go from | there into whatever modes might be appropriate. | roxgib wrote: | I've used Anki to great effect on a number of different fields. | Using it well it definitely skill you need to learn, but there's | nothing quite like it. Strongly recommend. | Avijit_Thawani wrote: | Other software which have nailed spaced repetition (and a much | better UI than Anki): | | - https://www.duolingo.com/ (language learninig) | | - https://www.chessable.com/ (chess) | | - https://readwise.io/ (book highlights) | | - https://examarly.com/ (test prep) | | - https://app.bestudious.io/login (certifications - CFA) | | - https://magoosh.com/ (vocabulary) | ChadNauseam wrote: | I'd like to add Mochi to the list https://mochi.cards/ | | It's just a standard flashcard tool like Anki, but with a much | better user interface and a simpler (IMO superior) SRS | algorithm. | Avijit_Thawani wrote: | totally love it as an alternative to Anki, didn't mention it | since it has already been praised by the original post | CobrastanJorji wrote: | wanikani.com is a good example for the very specific market of | "English speakers memorizing Japanese kanji." Great UI, great | community, great sense of humor, well thought out mnemonics... | | ...and of course I still fell off the wagon after a few months, | came back to a backlog in the thousands, and have had | tremendous trouble getting back on the wagon. | oslac wrote: | I would not call Duolingo a language learning application. It | behaves more like language mimicry application. You learn a | very particular subset of the language that I'd call "Duolingo | <insert lang>". This is my conclusion after using it for two | non-English languages. | | You seriously need a basic beginner book if starting from | fresh, and use Duolingo just as a repetition tool when you can | during the day | wordpad25 wrote: | If you're learning Duolingo subset of a language, it's still | a language learning application. | JCharante wrote: | It's more like a side quest rather than main story line. | And that's okay. | fermentation wrote: | I realized that, after a year of learning German on Duolingo, | the app had become something that I hated. The initial | gamified fun-ness became a stressor. Seeing the notification | every night that my streak was about to end stressed me out. | I had long since stopped enjoying the learning process | because it had felt like I wasn't learning anything at all. | Ending my streak felt amazing. | | I'm learning Japanese now through books, Anki, and a few | webapps. The gamification is gone and streaks don't really | matter. I'm sticking with it because I'm enjoying learning, | not because the owl is threatening me. | j45 wrote: | Duolingo gets a lot of hate. | | You can pick a lot worse to learn to be able to stumble | through a language for vacation. | | Learning the first few words in a language to start becoming | competent in it is not a bad thing. Managing one's | expectations is really important. | | Not all learners will learn best with a textbook or course | first. Variety helps. | | Humans have learned language by speaking before as much as, | if not more than reading/writing. | | Now, are there better apps coming out for this kind of thing? | Absolutely. The potential for LLM to be able to generate and | listen to pronunciation will be amazing. | | Prioritizing speaking before learning to read or write a | language really seems to irk some folks. | xk_id wrote: | Consensus among Serious language learners (i.e aiming for a | B2+ level) is that duolingo is marginally useful for learning | some vocabulary. A thorough course or textbook are essential | oslac wrote: | I agree. | j45 wrote: | As an aside, LogSeq is quite good at creating cards for spaced | repetition with just a hashtage and a cloze as you write your | notes. I would expect other tools like it (Obsidian, etc, can | do this as well) | MaxwellM wrote: | Agreed. Logseq changed the game for me. Because SRS is | closely coupled with note-taking and is as simple as adding | "#card", it eliminates any friction and excuses I had for not | using SRS. I look forward to adding new cards as much as I do | reviewing old ones. | jayro wrote: | At Math Academy (https://mathacademy.com), we implement spaced | repetition in combination with a knowledge graph consisting of | several thousand math topics and tens of thousands of | connections (and growing). We're working on a post that | explains how this all works technically. | | We have a Linear Algebra course | (https://mathacademy.com/courses/linear-algebra) that some of | you might find interesting given how often that topic shows up | on HN, and we just finished our Math for Machine Learning | course (https://mathacademy.com/courses/mathematics-for- | machine-lear...) for anyone who might be interested in giving | that a look. | | I'm the founder if anyone has any questions. | | Sorry about the shameless plug.;) | yangikan wrote: | Is there a way to try it out (at least for a week) without | paying the $49? | gary_bernhardt wrote: | I'm the founder of Execute Program | (https://www.executeprogram.com), where we've done a similar | thing (knowledge graph + SRS) for programming languages/tools | since 2019. Interesting to see that you have a graphviz | render of a subgraph right on the landing page! We've toyed | with the idea of exposing the graph visually, but haven't | done it yet. | sn9 wrote: | The UI/UX of executeprogram is genuinely amazing and the | way lessons are broken down is extremely well-thought out! | | Definitely recommended for anyone wanting to learn JS/TS, | regex, and SQL (especially in conjunction with Jennifer | Widom's Intro to Database lectures). | | (Given your background with Ruby, have you thought about | doing a Ruby course? I find it relatively easier finding | resources for JS, Python, and even Rust. I imagine you | could make an amazing Ruby introduction, though perhaps it | would require more work than JS/TS than I would expect.) | deathtrader666 wrote: | Hi, | | Given that SRS is a long-term endeavour, going on several | years, I'd balk at paying $49/month for your app. Maybe | $60/year, but your current pricing is really hard to swallow. | j45 wrote: | Really nice to hear knowledge graphs being used for... | learning knowledge. | charlieyu1 wrote: | I struggle to learn chess even with repetition. Very slight | difference on the board required drastically different plays. | It is almost as if there is no pattern | somsak2 wrote: | >A common failure mode (and I did this more than once, before I | got the hang of it) is to use Anki for two weeks, then drop it, | and pick it back up six months later only to find you have 600 | cards due for review. This is not encouraging, and it defeats the | point of spaced repetition, which is to review the cards on the | intervals the algorithm chooses. | | For successful long-term use of a spaced repetition program, I | believe that this model of thinking is unsustainable for most. I | used to have this relationship but had to grow past it as my life | circumstances changed and prevented me from having that | consistent amount of time every single day. | | Now, I look at Anki as a way to prioritize my learning time. When | I get to it, I have it present me the things that are the most- | overdue first. This has meant that I've gone from a typical | backlog of ~0 reviews at the end of the day to flexing between | ~500-2500 backlogged reviews. Just because I'm not reviewing the | piece of information at the exact right time doesn't mean that | I'm "defeating the point" of the piece of software. Spaced | repetition, even if done imperfectly, is still many times more | efficient than traditional study methods. | endisneigh wrote: | spaced repetition is dying for some amazing UX. it doesn't even | really make sense for you to make flash cards. ideally they could | be contextually created based on what you're viewing, e.g. you | read a wikipedia article, it infers what you're reading from | scroll position, takes content, makes cards, presents later, etc. | Veen wrote: | You may be interested in Andy Matuschak and Michael Nielsen's | work on mnemonic media. | | - https://andymatuschak.org/ | | - https://withorbit.com/ | | - https://numinous.productions/ttft/ | _dain_ wrote: | _> it doesn't even really make sense for you to make flash | cards. ideally they could be contextually created based on what | you're viewing_ | | It does matter. You shouldn't train on a flashcard until you | have learned the idea. The computer doesn't know if you | actually learned what you read. Making the flashcard based on | your own understanding is an important part of encoding the | memory -- it's an active process, rather than passive. | | It's well established in communities that use Anki a lot (like | language learners) that someone else's pre-made decks aren't as | effective as making your own. The exceptions are either small | and simple (e.g. NATO phonetic alphabet), or had a _lot_ of | thought put into them with community feedback, like the ones | medical students use. | Al-Khwarizmi wrote: | _It 's well established in communities that use Anki a lot | (like language learners) that someone else's pre-made decks | aren't as effective as making your own._ | | This is indeed a usual claim. But given a reasonably good | pre-made deck, I doubt it's universally true if you factor in | the time it takes to make the cards. | | I'm learning Chinese vocabulary with a pre-made deck. I | devote 20-30 minutes per day (have been doing so for a couple | of years), introducing 8 new cards per day. My success rate | is typically worse than for most people who make their own | decks (floating around ~80% for mature cards) but I see clear | and steady progress. | | If I wanted to create my own cards, I would probably need to | slow the pace to around 2-3 cards per day tops (as deciding | which cards to create and then creating them would take time | which I wouldn't be able to spend studying), and they would | have no audio, which the pre-made deck does and makes a | difference. | zetalyrae wrote: | I'd argue vocabulary is a special case. There's not that | much going on. There really isn't a concept graph involved. | endisneigh wrote: | you're talking about training on flashcards. I'm talking | about making the flash cards. of course using other people's | cards isn't going to work (as well) - you don't have any | context around them. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-04-10 23:00 UTC)