[HN Gopher] Rural Americans are importing tiny Japanese pickup t... ___________________________________________________________________ Rural Americans are importing tiny Japanese pickup trucks Author : dduugg Score : 200 points Date : 2023-04-20 20:10 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.economist.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.economist.com) | porphyra wrote: | One of the most highly upvoted Reddit posts on /r/fuckcars mocks | large pickups compared to the utility of a kei truck. | | https://reddit.com/r/fuckcars/comments/sdrgv3/japanese_truck... | | A kei truck has about 90% the bed length of a pickup while being | a lot more nimble. The lower bed is more ergonomic to load and | unload too. | nicbou wrote: | For me, European multipurpose vehicles (sprinter vans?) were a | revelation. An old Renault Kangoo is cheap to buy, cheap to | drive and cheap to maintain. It's a small, simple car that | drives and parks like a small sedan, but carries as much as a | small pickup truck. | | I can fit a bed, 3 months of luggage and a bicycle in mine. In | a pinch, it's a brilliant microcamper. It's a big box on | wheels. You can do what you want with it. | | It's not a nice car, but it was designed to serve real user | needs. That's why they're everywhere from Morocco to Poland. | porphyra wrote: | Vans are really much more practical. | | * protects your goods from weather | | * more cargo volume | | * better forward visibility without a long hood | | * easier to load and unload due to being lower | | * can park it without people being able to walk up to it and | taking your tools and equipment out of the exposed truck bed | rtpg wrote: | This made me realize why I see so many Kangoos in Japan, | despite them not really being cheap here! A bit of a nicer | version of a Kei truck, without being a full minivan! | quarantine wrote: | The Citroen Berlingo really is one of the best cars they made | lm28469 wrote: | The c15 is an icon too, such a classic, produced from 1984 | until 2006, it can carry almost as much as it weights. And | it was designed to fit a full euro palette in the back http | s://images.caradisiac.com/images/0/9/8/4/190984/S0-route... | echelon wrote: | The /r/fuckcars folks are being a little dishonest here. As | another commenter mentioned, this is like asking a vegan for | steak recommendations at a restaurant. | | Subaru Sambar (kei truck) towing capacity: 1,300 lbs | | Ford F-150 towing capacity: 5,000 to 11,300 lbs | | Ford F-250 Shelby edition towing capacity: 24,200 pounds | | And that's just one additional dimension where these vehicles | significantly differ. | | These vehicles are utilitarian workhorses great for | contracting, construction, farming (eg. hauling livestock), | towing (eg. other cars, trailers, mobile BBQ, etc.), boating, | leisure [1], etc. | | I live in an urban area close enough to the forest, lakes, and | pastures to see all of these uses frequently. | | The electric version will power job sites, camp sites, and help | with disaster recovery. It's going to sell like hot cakes. | | [1] https://www.f150forum.com/f34/how-pull-jeep-out- | mud-130086/#... | libraryatnight wrote: | I know a lot of people with those ridiculous big trucks, and | 2 of them use them for utility, one has a boat and one has a | 5th wheel. The others just...have them. So until there's zero | people driving them for vanity or aggression reasons, it | doesn't feel dishonest at all. Your response feels like a | typical US response to social ills - turn a blind eye to a | problem because a) the thing causing the problem is | fun/popular/profitable b) there's a handful of hyper specific | potentially valid reasons for the thing that have nothing to | do with the people causing the problem (most of the giant | trucks in my area can't even haul anything because of the | vanity lifts and various "upgrades" - they would make the | argument you are as to why they should be allowed but they | would not support anything that would restrict them to those | purposes). | porphyra wrote: | The point isn't that the smaller truck is an equally capable | vehicle. The point is to make fun of people who don't need a | truck but are getting an overkill vehicle as a status symbol, | all the while people who actually need to transport goods can | still get a lot done with a tiny kei truck. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | Missing the point. Many people buying inefficient oversized | pickup trucks don't care that there's smaller and more | efficient options out there, but they do it for the status | simbol and ego lifting, not to be utilitarian and efficient. | | I see these monster pick-up trucks more and more in European | cities nowadays too, F-150s, Dodge Rams, with some fancy | paintjob and big wheels but who's bed hasn't seen any actual | use carrying anything because the owner is usually some middle- | aged Ray-Ban wearing divorced dad with money, using it as a | toy, trying to look cool. Power to him I guess, but those | monster trucks are horrible for visibility and safety of | cyclists, pedestrians, small cars, etc. | | Most utilitarians here, blue collar workers, people for whom | their vehicles are a tool for the job, mostly drive white vans | here, as they're a lot more practical and economical than big | trucks. | flappyeagle wrote: | It's not missing the point. It's making the point. | eldritch_4ier wrote: | Not even necessarily ego or whatever. Some people just like | trucks, and a car's "reputation" is part of the purchase | decision for many buyers. It's why men don't buy Beetles or | Priuses as often as women and women don't buy trucks as often | as men for instance. Many people express themselves with | their car. | nathanaldensr wrote: | Huge lifted trucks are just flashy iPhones in another form-- | jewelry and signals of wealth to others. | iancmceachern wrote: | Not me. | | I bought a F250 diesel to tow my 13,000 lb rv. Smaller | vehicles can't do that. | codalan wrote: | Sprinter vans are more practical than modern pickups. You can | fit a few sheets of drywall into it, lock up your stuff, and | keep everything out of the elements. If you have a windowless | van, you have everything out of sight, as well. | glitcher wrote: | Another factor is safety. I don't share this point of view, | but I have seen others purposely choose large, heavy vehicles | for family members so they stand a better chance surviving a | bad collision. | | If you've ever sat in traffic driving a small car surrounded | by large vehicles it definitely starts to sink in that you | are at a distinct disadvantage if anything goes wrong. So | this trend is also at least partially about this weird arms | race of wanting to feel safer in the presence of ever larger | vehicles. | cvwright wrote: | Not sure why you're being downvoted. I live in Dallas and | this is 100% true. | | What's fun is when you notice that the biggest, flashiest | trucks are all concentrated in the fanciest suburbs. Once you | get out in the country, off the main roads like where I'm | from, suddenly (1) pickup trucks make up a _lower_ percentage | of the traffic, and (2) they are generally* smaller, more | utilitarian and more beat up. | | * except for the occasional F350 dually pulling an actual | horse trailer | boredumb wrote: | Where I live the hills would stall that kei out before you got | to any real hills, with nothing at all added to the bed. | [deleted] | tlear wrote: | Those things are used in mountains in Japan without any | issues at all, they are very light. | aae42 wrote: | Gear ratios, you might just not be getting up the hills very | quickly | thesuitonym wrote: | Why do you believe that? | Kye wrote: | I've seen enough attempting greater feats than carrying | normal loads up hills in /r/IdiotsInCars to know you're | completely and hilariously wrong. | themodelplumber wrote: | I rode in kei-trucks and kei-vans with an adult in every | seat, up some very steep and long hills in Japan. We weren't | exactly in the fast lane, but there was not any mention of | the van not being up to the task. It felt just fine. | | In fact my friend was SO excited about his new van (for 1998) | that for a while, he was bragging about every last little | aspect up and down those hills, every time we rode with him. | He lived in a gigantic danchi at the top of one of the | steepest hills around, and still loved that thing. | | (He worked as a furnace-jumper-inner / furnace-insides- | scraper at an auto recycling place all day, and had molten | aluminum burns on his arms and sometimes face...I respected | the heck out of that guy for what he did to support his | family. I think he runs an IT business in Brazil now.) | thebooktocome wrote: | Japan is famously mountainous. I can't imagine they don't | road test them on "real hills". | nilespotter wrote: | I would much, much rather have a new $70k Ford F150 Raptor than | a tiny Japanese truck . Honestly a redditor - perhaps the most | odious group on the Iternet - recommending the tiny Japanese | truck over the F150 is a good enough reason to prefer the | opposite; a redditor on "fuckcars" is a GREAT reason to prefer | the opposite. | autophagian wrote: | Why? | nilespotter wrote: | Basically because it's a high-mid-tier, nice modern car. | Comparatively it has a quieter and smoother ride will allow | me to make phone calls on my commute, using carplay to make | the calls, read messages to me, and play music through the | incredible sounding large badass speakers. The ride is | much, much, much smoother. It'll be much more comfortable | for a long road trip. There will be more room in the cab | for stuff like say, my wife AND my dog. It comes with a | warranty that I can use at any number of locations near me. | Parts are still made for it and I can buy them here. It has | R17 tires, 4 wheel drive, and anti-lock braking, electronic | traction assist, TPMS, it will tell me when there might be | ice on the road so I should proceed with caution, it has an | advanced cruise control system with radar and lane keep | assist, etc., etc., etc. | dsfyu404ed wrote: | Because people who hate a thing are generally not the most | knowledgeable about it and even if they know their | judgement is clouded by hate. They only like the | alternative to be contrarian. | | I'm not gonna ask PETA for tips on raising beef steers, I'm | not gonna ask Joe Biden what gun I should buy and I'm not | gonna ask /r/fuckcars what car I should buy. And this is on | top of the usual Reddit circle jerks and groupthink that | make asking for advice there for anything of meaningful | stakes questionable in general. | throitallaway wrote: | "Own the libs" is a mantra for some people. | everyone wrote: | It is puzzling how _everything_ in the US seems to be | _excessively_ large. If you go there it feels like u have shrunk | by 15% | Simulacra wrote: | https://archive.is/xD4yE | daxfohl wrote: | Wow, my dad runs some apartments and he's always buzzing random | stuff from one place to another. He complains all the time that | pickup trucks keep getting bigger and harder to use for day-to- | day tasks. Seems like something like this would be perfect. | nicbou wrote: | What about a sprinter van, or whatever you would call a Renault | Kangoo? This is what tradespeople use in Europe. They're | absurdly practical. | laurencerowe wrote: | There's someone with a lovely little Kei Firetruck in Bernal | Heights. Makes me smile every time I walk past it. | | https://www.sfchronicle.com/local/article/Meet-Kiri-the-tiny... | aidenn0 wrote: | Funny, I was chatting with some Rural Americans while on vacation | in the Bahamas, and they all were super impressed with the Kei | pickups they saw while there. I didn't know you could legally | register 25+ year old ones... | pharmakom wrote: | Fantastic. Now can suburban moms do the same? | adamrezich wrote: | why do you want suburban moms to drive their kids around in a | small flatbed? | throwyawayyyy wrote: | Pretty sure the commenter is referring to what, in London, | are called Chelsea Tractors. | adamrezich wrote: | sure, when I was growing up my mom drove myself and my four | siblings around in a Suburban. I understand the baseline | desire to signal virtue with regards to large motor | vehicles, but even a brief glance at the photo in the | article should be enough for any sane person to see that | driving more than a single child around in such a vehicle | is blatantly untenable. | | downvoters might also be surprised at how safe large motor | vehicles are for transporting children, especially in areas | with spontaneous, often-unavoidable wildlife crossing. try | hitting a mule deer crossing the road in the dark in one of | those little trucks and see how many kids riding (on the | flatbed??) survive. | theandrewbailey wrote: | Dead on arrival. Not enough room for the kids and dogs. | nicbou wrote: | Europeans do just fine with multipurpose vehicles and regular | small cars. You dont need a Strassenpanzer to bring two wee | kids and a few grocery bags around. | lapetitejort wrote: | People haul kids and dogs in the beds of their trucks? | simonsarris wrote: | Many new trucks can fit three car seats. What was once the | truck bed is now a smaller truck bed and a second row of | seats. Aka a "full size cab". | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | Maybe the family could loose some weight. _HA GOTEM_ | joewhale wrote: | it's easy to throw rocks when you personally don't have 3-4 | kids. | tshaddox wrote: | You probably won't fit more than 2 kids in a gigantic pickup | truck either. And you'll mostly see them empty apart from the | driver anyway. | yamtaddle wrote: | A lot of the popular models have full-size back seats. | They've got more room back there, and are easier to get at | (to, say, strap a kid into a car seat, or to add/remove a | car seat) than many sedans. | pharmakom wrote: | Please buy a minivan if this is your situation. | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | Why? What do you care what he drives? | yamtaddle wrote: | Cars much bigger, heavier, and with worse visibility than | necessary, make the roads more dangerous for everyone | else--motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, _everyone_. | | The whole thing's turning into an expensive, dangerous | game of prisoner's dilemma. It's best if everyone buys | exactly as much car as they need, but anyone who | "defects" and buys a bigger, heavier car is safer than | everyone else, while making everyone else a little less- | safe. Iterate for a few decades and you get the current | situation. | | However, begging individuals to behave differently isn't | going to fix the problem. Certainly not in the US. | nicbou wrote: | You need to rethink the incentives. Big, wasteful cars | have no business being as cheap as a small family car. | This was not accidental. | yamtaddle wrote: | Oh, for sure. The old-school conservative solution, from | back before "conservative" meant "simply don't try to do | good things, at all" (at least, in the US) would have | been to try to price in the added risk to others (and | other externalities, like extra road-wear) to discourage | having too-large vehicles. I think that could work. | | Never gonna happen, because too many people think | discouraging choices that make public roads more | dangerous, or simply _paying for costs they impose on | others through their choices_ , is outright tyranny, but | hey, it's a nice idea. | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote: | https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/2020-traffic-crash- | data... | | > The estimated number of police-reported crashes in 2020 | decreased by 22% as compared to 2019, and the estimated | number of people injured declined by 17%. | | > While the number of crashes and traffic injuries | declined overall, fatal crashes increased by 6.8%. | | It's at least a somewhat common belief that the 6.8% | increase of _fatal_ crashes despite a decrease in _total_ | crashes is caused by a perceived increase of the average | size of vehicles on the road. A minivan is not an | American-sized pickup truck which are commonly seen as | unsafe for other drivers. | anigbrowl wrote: | Because we have to share the road with other people's | vehicles, and bad drivers in giant pickups are a hazard | to others' health. | yellowapple wrote: | While I largely agree with you, AWD/4WD minivans seem to be | harder to find than AWD/4WD SUVs - so if you live in a | place with both snow and hills, you're probably going to be | gravitating toward an SUV. | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote: | I kinda want to take a picture of the parking lot at a | local (Salt Lake County, UT) Costco. It's almost | exclusively "light truck"-classified pickups and similarly | sized SUVs. I'm sure a similar image has already been | captured for posterity but damn if it wouldn't be useful | for pointing to a problem. | Kon-Peki wrote: | You can buy Kei vans too. I've seen them, in the USA. Same | import rules as the Kei trucks. When I lived in Chicago, a | neighbor had one. It was 4x4 too, so great in the winter. | Marsymars wrote: | SUV market share is ~50%, families with >2 children are ~5%. | 2muchcoffeeman wrote: | So what did people do when they had 3-4 kids in the 80s? I | see families of 4 with huge SUVs these days. | | If anything they want a kei van right? It maximises the size | of the vehicle, cuboid on wheels, and minimises the cost for | that volume. | SoftTalker wrote: | They drove big station wagons. | sgath92 wrote: | And the station wagons got killed off by CAFE standards | because they were treated as cars instead of as their own | category. Taking a sedan and turning it into a station | wagon is going to inherently make it heavier and less | fuel efficient. | | So if the auto makers are already struggling to make | their sedans hit MPG goals, suddenly those station wagons | have to be phased out. | | Though to be fair, minivans start in the mid 80s and were | very popular in the 90s instead of SUVs. Comparable MPGs | to the wagons but felt a lot more roomy inside. | | The big problem came in the 2000s when the auto makers | started subtly turning their minivans into SUVs. Even the | last wagon hold outs like Volvo took this road | eventually. | themaninthedark wrote: | But interestingly enough, a lot of new vehicles are SUVs | that look like lifted station wagons... | | So we like the form factor of station wagon | klyrs wrote: | We didn't use seatbelts or booster seats. We rode in the | bed of the pickup, we rode sitting backwards in the trunk | of a hatchback, we crammed in 5-wide in the bench seat in | the back of a sedan. | | Also, there were proto-SUVs like the Chevy Suburban. | 2muchcoffeeman wrote: | I never had a pickup truck, but I did have seat belts and | booster seats. We just didn't use them as much. But | that's not really relevant to having enough space in a | vehicle. We had plenty of space in cars. There was | nothing wrong with the size. | peterpost2 wrote: | Like you can't fit 3-4 kids in a sedan. Hell most people | have 2 cars per family nowadays should still fit easily. Or | if you really have a large family a minivan works even | better and is less dangerous to other travellers and | yourselfs and has a lower gas usage. SUV's and trucks are | stupid for 99,99% of the use cases. | traverseda wrote: | Station wagons are big and you could throw a couple kids in | the back no seat belts no problem | crooked-v wrote: | If we could finally ditch the light-duty trucks loophole [1], | that would probably help when it comes to the incentives to | build certain kinds of vehicle. | | [1]: https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-wants-to-close-the-suv- | lo... | bagels wrote: | If you're in California, this isn't for you, sadly. | jamestimmins wrote: | Why not? Are they illegal here? | westhom wrote: | You can only get them registered for off-road use. You can | also use them on Catalina island. But no way to register them | as street legal, legally. | tinglymintyfrsh wrote: | Stanford did too (the van kind) to squeeze between bollards. They | were able to avoid CAFE and CARB standards because they're their | own municipality, and technically they're not licensed for | _public_ street use. | jnmandal wrote: | Yeah these things are awesome. Exactly what I need on my land. I | hope to get one someday. | tgtweak wrote: | I see these all over the place in asiapac, especially at resorts | for staff and maintenance to get around on smaller pathways in | lieu of golf carts or runabouts. It makes a lot of sense when you | consider that they are easy to move around on a small boat/ferry | and can be used on the roads. These places also have a much high | percentage of motorbikes, scooters and ATVs and the same | garages/shops that service those can service these smaller | engines with readily accessible parts. | | The fact they can't really be driven on interstates/highways is | the only thing that would make it difficult to sell them here as | new vehicles. | | Given how well the ford maverick is selling, and the successful | introduction of the hyundai santacruz (and soon-to-be-introduced | chevy montana) I think it's safe to bet there would have been a | decent market for new vehicles in this segment if the | manufacturers could get them highway-compatible. | AtlasBarfed wrote: | Yeah, the u.s market does not really support this variety of | form factors and motor cars but I think EVs are going to change | that because it's a lot easier to vary the size of a battery, | the main primary component of an EV vehicle and just slap on | any of a range of electric motors. | macinjosh wrote: | Big American trucks are like denim jeans. | | Jeans started out as super useful and economical clothing worn by | miners, cowboys, etc. fast forward n years and people are paying | hundreds of dollars for exclusive denim and designs with pre-worn | holes and other artificial wear patterns. | | Trucks today look like they could be utilitarian and used for | work but are really just an overpriced fashion statement. | fnbr wrote: | man, I want a tiny Japanese pickup truck | LinuxBender wrote: | I've seriously contemplated getting one of these. Street legal, | fuel efficient, simple, but when I started researching them I | started to see a pattern. It's hard to find anyone in rural areas | willing to work on them and not all mini trucks are equal. Some | are not shipped correctly and have frame rust issues. There are | YouTuber's that cover some of the models and the gotchas and | things to inspect. I would never buy one without inspecting it | locally. I've seen a couple of them in town and the owners | somehow manage to keep them running. | | I am leaning more towards a street legal side-by-side as there | are a few dealers here and they have people to perform more | advanced repairs. Downside is they cost more especially if I want | a fully enclosed cab _with windshield and heater_ , something | that is a must during the winter here. Upside is I can take it | into the mountains and also use it to run into town for | groceries. | | An upside to either of these options is that these are the | remaining vehicles that do not _as of yet_ have any of the | telemetry, dashboard infotainment systems, pay-as-you-go for | subscriptions for standard features, etc... | robocat wrote: | Perhaps consider a visit to New Zealand and buying one there if | you can't import one from Japan (keyword "direct import"), | although your total costs would be high. We are friendly | buggers over here, so you are not likely to get ripped off | unless you are a numpty. Buy an unregistered spare one for | parts - used farm ones without plates get sold much cheaper. | | https://www.trademe.co.nz/a/motors/cars/suzuki/carry/search -- | all used imports from Japan. Note prices are in NZD, reduce | prices by 1/3 to get to USD. You can get GST (sales tax) | refunded on exports but it might not be much money because | second hand goods are zero-rated? | | I really wanted a 1.3 litre 4WD Suzuki Carry a few years ago, | but they really hold their value so they were not cheap enough | for me. USD8000 for a 20 year old ute! They are in high demand | in NZ. | | I personally would avoid the Subaru mini-truck: I think | mechanical issues and access to parts are problems. I also | looked at the equivalent Hyundai mini-truck, but the Suzuki is | probably the best bet. | | Japan has regulations that make old vehicles expensive to keep, | so they export them before they get really old. New Zealand | buys a lot of second hand car stock from Japan. If you need | something 25 years old, then New Zealand might have more stock. | | We don't salt our roads. Anything that has spent all its life | in dry areas like the Canterbury Plains would be best - don't | buy if it has been long periods in wet climates. Avoid anything | that has been on the coast - avoid sea-spray rust damage (don't | buy from my local area, New Brighton). | lancewiggs wrote: | We do, however, drive on the other side of the road from | those in the USA. | robocat wrote: | Yeah, but this thread seems to mainly be talking about | left-hand drive imports. | | If someone does their homework, they could bring over a big | American Ute to NZ (buy cheap in US, sell for _heaps_ in | NZ). Need to be _extremely_ careful about NZ regulations | though - complicated and relatively costly /risky. Ideally | find someone in NZ that has done it for the model you want | to do it for. | doublerebel wrote: | I'd recommend looking for a reputable dealer who does a proper | shipment and inspection. Here in Seattle we have https://sodo- | moto.com who works with fvej.com to bring vehicles over and | ensure the quality. | codalan wrote: | They probably share a lot of the same drivetrain/engine/etc. | parts from vehicles of the same era. If you are mechanically | inclined and have the right tools, you might be able to do some | of the work yourself. Most auto mechanics familiar with older | Japanese branded vehicles should be able to work on them like | they would on a regular US import. | | The biggest issue I have is that they are right-hand drive. I'd | be hesitant driving a mini-truck on streets and highways, even | if it's licensed. This would be a non-issue if the intent is to | leave it on private property, unlicensed. | | I wish mini-trucks had a bigger demand here. I'd like a pickup, | but I don't need the monster trucks that are on the market | these days. Just something to move furniture, appliances, and | junk around town. | pwthornton wrote: | There are some smaller options these days. The Honda | Ridgeline has led the way here as a very livable, smaller | (although not small) truck. | | The Ford Maverick is even smaller. It is a bit more barebones | but it might work for you. | codalan wrote: | The problem with the Maverick (as others have mentioned) is | that they squander valuable bed space by adding a cab to | the design. | | To me, a pickup truck is a pretty utilitarian thing. I | don't need a cab. I have other vehicles if I need to take | passengers. | | I remember pricing out a pickup a few years ago, and it was | hard to find one that wasn't already configured with a cab. | I guess the market demand is larger for people who have | kids but still want a pickup for whatever reason. | AtlasBarfed wrote: | I cannot wait for EV drivetrains to invade side by sides, | especially ones based on sodium ion or LMP or LFP. | itronitron wrote: | >> the owners somehow manage to keep them running | | the people that depend on these vehicles are particularly tuned | in to how to keep them alive... | | Years ago, when my wife and I lived in a _' rural adjacent'_ | community we had a ~20 year old manual transmission european | sedan sitting in our driveway for about a year, tires slowly | deflating, until one couple stopped by to enquire about it. My | wife told them that if you can get it running you can have it, | the husband came back a few days later to sign the paperwork, | and after popping the hood and turning a few knobs was able to | get it started and drove it away :) | | Very happy that the vehicle had an extended life with someone | that could put it to use. | poulsbohemian wrote: | >It's hard to find anyone in rural areas willing to work on | them and not all mini trucks are equal. | | Living in a rural area, I first saw these popping up at least a | decade ago. The typical farmer / rancher has to be mechanically | skilled and one of the benefits of these vehicles is that they | are relatively simple mechanically speaking, IE: assuming | availability of parts you could do the work yourself. | fundad wrote: | I guess if there's a dealer that's something but isn't it | getting hard to get any kind of car worked on in rural areas? | LinuxBender wrote: | _isn 't it getting hard to get any kind of car worked on in | rural areas?_ | | It is. I can do some mechanical work but I have no idea what | special tools and tricks are required knowledge with these | trucks. At least with side-by-sides there are a myriad of | dealers and mechanics near me as so many people use them | around their ranches, to go into town and to go into the | mountains. There is probably some little shop that would say | they could work on the mini-trucks but my experience with the | small businesses here as that most of them _fake it until | they make it, but they never make it_. So I would be taking a | bit of a gamble. If I found one that was cheap enough it | might be worth the gamble as I could just write off the loss | if it has some obscure problem. That is why I am still on the | fence. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | SXS are overpriced and underdeliver compared to what you can | get from a minitruck. | leetrout wrote: | Or even just a used jeep wrangler given how overpriced they | are. | asciimov wrote: | I seriously miss compact trucks, like the Mazda B-series, Ford | Courier, Ford Ranger (before it became a mid-size in 2019). | | These kinds of trucks might more to your liking. Sure they | aren't as small and cute as the imports, but your local auto | store can still get you parts for them. | | They are fun to drive, fairly fuel efficient, and are capable | of hauling material from the home center. I learned to drive | stick, and how to pop the clutch when you have a dead battery, | in a Ford Courier on the high plains of west Texas. | munificent wrote: | I still drive a manual 2002 Toyota Tacoma and you'll have to | claw it out of my dead hands for this exact reason. I really | love the utility of a pick-up truck, but I absolutely despise | the size of any of them in the US in the past couple of | decades. | | I wish they still made mid-sized pick-ups that were actually | mid-sized. | | A Tacoma is nearly the size of Tundra was twenty years ago, | and a Tundra today is like the size of a damn schoolbus. | iancmceachern wrote: | You can get the Ford Maverick | munificent wrote: | A Maverick is just an open air hatchback. | | It's the same length as my 2002 Xtracab Tacoma, which is | nice, but my Tacoma has a bed that's literally twenty | inches longer. | saalweachter wrote: | I still long in my heart for a pickup that is as small as | possible while having an 8 ft bed, but honestly once you | also need to take children with you wherever you go, the | compromise of a shorter bed with a good sized back seat | (to accommodate car seats) really begins to make a lot of | sense. | | In the end, I ended up just attaching a trailer hitch to | my Chevy Volt and buying a lightweight 8ft trailer. As | long as I just need to move big and not heavy, it's | perfectly adequate, and the mileage when I'm not hauling | is a lot better. | | And it cost me about $2k while keeping me out of the | insane used truck market. | laweijfmvo wrote: | At 199.7 inches, the Maverick is a barely an inch shorter | than the shortest Ranger (201.2). | fredgrott wrote: | The funny thing is the Ford Courier had the Mazda Body but a | Toyota engine as I had one in high school. | jdmichal wrote: | The MY2022 Maverick is what the new Ranger should have been. | And the Hyundai Santa Cruz also was introduced in MY2022. | Finally some steps in the right direction, at least. | AtlasBarfed wrote: | A wide range of electric vehicles are going to invade to fill up | almost all these gaps, especially once cheap sodium ion | drivetrains and batteries become available | tibbydudeza wrote: | Our family car a Corolla (I drive a hatchback) was replaced by a | Tucson and I considered it big even though it is classed as | compact SUV in the US. | | Well it all made sense when I saw a Kia Telluride. | ztetranz wrote: | My neighbor has one. He drives around with his big dog in the | (lefthand) passenger seat. It looks like the dog is driving. | dsfyu404ed wrote: | You really wanna F with people get a spare steering wheel and | have the passenger hold it and act confused. | ryukafalz wrote: | New minitrucks should be legal here! If you don't need a huge | truck, you should be able to buy something smaller. | lastofthemojito wrote: | You do see new minitrucks in certain non-road settings in the | US, but yeah, they aren't street legal. Some folks import them | for use as UTVs: https://usminitrucksales.com | | It's the same somewhat bizarre logic that makes it fine to | register say, a 1969 VW Beetle in the US, but not a 2004 | Mexican Beetle that's no less clean or safe. The older stuff | gets grandfathered in because at that age there's hardly anyone | willing to bother. But if new minitrucks were road legal, | they'd be everywhere, and there might be an epidemic of | minitruck highway deaths, etc. | gedy wrote: | Owner of a 69 Beetle here, and similarly frustrating that I | can't buy and bring home a Suzuki Jimny across the nearby | border with Mexico | angry_octet wrote: | There's a bit of confusion here: there are modern small | cars/vans/trucks that are safe (e.g. | https://www.euroncap.com/en/press-media/press- | releases/euro-...) but efficient and well designed, and then | there are new vehicles built for a slightly lower price with | safety features like _crumple zones_ entirely absent, | commonly sold in Mexico. These are death traps. Many of the | Chinese trucks (e.g. Great Wall) were like that too, but they | do make safer ones now. | LucasBrandt wrote: | I'll take the theoretical chance of an "epidemic of minitruck | highway deaths" over the current reality of an epidemic of | traffic fatalities made worse by cars and trucks getting | heavier, taller, and deadlier. | yellowapple wrote: | If these were easier to register here in NV I'd buy one in a | heartbeat. | falcolas wrote: | > And unlike a side-by-side, it can also be driven legally on | local roads | | Side by sides can, with a few accessories (horn, license plate | lights, turn signals, etc), be driven legally on roads. Most | dealers are happy to sell and attach these high profit items for | you. | lastofthemojito wrote: | If you're talking about the US, state laws vary widely: | https://outdoortroop.com/in-what-states-are-side-by-sides-st... | LinuxBender wrote: | Adding for completeness sake, that site is out of date for my | state. Street legal UTV's and mini-trucks are called | "Multipurpose vehicles" in Wyoming and can be registered to | operate on streets and highways. They even issue these nifty | little Wyoming license plates that are UTV sized. The | requirements are in the linked PDF. | | Funny side note, my state even has a picture of one of the | Japanese mini-trucks in the PDF. [1] | | I think people should look up the DoT website for their state | to get the current legal requirements for street legal UTV's | and mini-trucks. | | [1] - https://www.dot.state.wy.us/files/live/sites/wydot/file | s/sha... | amundskm wrote: | Depends on the state. | yellowapple wrote: | The states that don't allow street-legalified side-by-sides | are unlikely to allow imported Kei trucks, either. | nonethewiser wrote: | I can see the utility but most country road speed limits are | gonna be 50 mph+. I wouldn't want to drive it there. Dirt roads | or on your land, sure. | | Regardless, they look pretty cool. A cheaper option, but lower | quality, might be some small trucks from China. | | It will also be interesting to see how Fords Maverick catches on. | May not quite fill this niche but seems like a good option | overall. | Marsymars wrote: | Problem with the Ford Maverick is that it's only available in | crew cab with a 4.5 ft bed, which is really a sub-par | configuration if your priorities are in moving stuff rather | than people. | germinalphrase wrote: | And no 4wd option on the hybrid. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | Roof rack with the back half mounted to the bed or hitch can | mitigate that to an extent. That's how I haul oversized stuff | in a pre-2011 Ranger. | Marsymars wrote: | Hah, I once built a roof rack like that with my dad for a | standard cab pickup to carry kayaks. | | Works great for occasional use, but still really sub- | optimal to have an extra row of unused seat rather than bed | space to put stuff if your primary use of the truck is to | carry stuff in the bed. | slackfan wrote: | Hi, I live in the boonies, and own one of these minitrucks. | | a) They do 60mph ok if you have a four-speed one. Five-speed | ones will do 70 just fine. | | b) country roads are generally 45 in most states. | | c) chinese minitrucks have a hell of a lot less support for | about the same price. | | d) Ford mavericks are DOA here. If you want a work van you buy | a work van. | kubectl_h wrote: | Can you expand on what you mean by DOA in this context? | slackfan wrote: | I see them about as much as I see the Hyundai equivalent, | and they all appear to be owned by folks that live in the | local capital city. | maxerickson wrote: | Perhaps a contributing factor is that they have a 4.5 foot | long bed. | | That will at least get it perceived as not being a great | work truck. | | It looks like the Honda thing is like 6.5 feet, so you are | sticking off the back quite a lot less if you have an 8 | foot load. | throwway120385 wrote: | Common lumber and sheathing is 8 feet long, so having a | 6.5 foot bed means not having to flag the lumber while | you're hauling it. Also I can't imagine fitting a gas | generator, 5-gallon can, gas compressor, saws, nailguns, | hardware, and nails all in the back of that 4-foot bed. | When I was framing people would fill up their S-10s with | the gear. | camhenlin wrote: | What state do you live in that rural roads are 45? On the | entire west coast they're at least 55 and the average speed | is more realistically in the mid 60s. I think in some of the | south west states the speed limit on 2 lane rural roads is | more like 70mph | slackfan wrote: | 45-55 out here, realistic speeds are about the same because | flat ground is at a premium. | officeplant wrote: | is the Maverick DOA? I see the all over my rural farm area | and people are paying $8000 over sticker for the privilege of | getting one of the few in stock. | slackfan wrote: | Must be somewhere in the flatlands then. The small(er) | truck market is dominated by Toyota, Nissan and Chevrolets | and Ford Rangers. Mavericks are mostly city-dweller mom- | mobiles at best. | officeplant wrote: | Louisiana swamps. They don't want to buy many SantaCruz's | or Ridgelines, but as soon as you show them a Ford | Maverick they are game. | | Mostly driven by people who white-flighted out of the | city and need something to pick up chicken feed and | mulch. | Kon-Peki wrote: | You can't just go to a Ford dealer and buy a Maverick | yet. The only people that have them placed an order a | year or more ago. | | Wait until your local dealer has 20 of them parked next | to their 1000 F150s before you decide on whether rural | folks are going to buy them or not. | nemo44x wrote: | I'd love a Maverick for a weekend automobile for things | like going to the countryside for the day, hiking, and | picking things up at Home Depot, etc. for the money it | seems like a pretty cool thing. I hope to buy a used one | in a couple years. | | If I was in a rural area and had to do serious things | with it and haul then I wouldn't be in the market. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | The new Ranger and its competition are not actually small | trucks. They're the size of what the F150 used to be. | fckgw wrote: | Not at all. They sold 70k Mavericks last year and have 80k | MY23s on pre-order. For context, the Maverick outsold the | Ranger by nearly 50%. The main issue at the moment is they | can't make them fast enough. | | I put in a pre-order for a hybrid 6 months ago and have | probably another 6 months to wait. | officeplant wrote: | Sounds about right for my area too. Between the Maverick | and the Bronco Sport Ford has managed to make a lot of | bank off the Escape platform. | guestbest wrote: | I don't know if those little tires can handle muddy, unpaved | country roads like a tractor can. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | You can mount ATV wheels on them. | dboreham wrote: | Be careful about speed ratings for tires and wheels. | yellowapple wrote: | Lift it and stick full-size tires on it. Like a miniature | monster truck. | brucethemoose2 wrote: | The long travel side-by-sides, on the other hand, are pretty | incredible offroad. | camhenlin wrote: | I've looked into one of these and they're completely illegal in | my state, no way to register them without gaming different dmv | stations and getting a clueless dmv rep who doesn't know what | they're looking at, to register it. This is Oregon. Really | unfortunate situation as these fit a lot of use cases that would | previously require something as big as a gas guzzling Ford F150 | otherwise. | duncan-donuts wrote: | Why are they illegal? | gorbypark wrote: | Someone has to pay to have a vehicle certified (crash tests, | emissions, figure out what's needs modified to meet US | regulations, etc). If the vehicle was never sold in the US to | begin with, then they can't be registered until they are 25+ | years old. Even then, it's hard/impossible in some states. | | My memory is a bit hazy, but at one point in time an importer | company paid the large sums (hundreds of thousands I'm sure) | to have a certain GT-R model go through the safety/emission | procedures so they could be imported before they were 25 | years old. That's the only case I can think of. | inferiorhuman wrote: | My memory is a bit hazy, but at one point in time an | importer company paid the large sums (hundreds of | thousands I'm sure) to have a certain GT-R model go | through the safety/emission procedures so they could be | imported before they were 25 years old. That's the | only case I can think of. | | If memory serves, there were a couple people importing R32 | Skylines. The one shop stopped doing the necessary work and | got caught. Nobody wants to do the work because it's | extremely expensive and bureaucratic. The problem with | relaxing the rules is that you're either going to accept | more pollution or heavily restrict the number of vehicles | that can be imported creating an unfair lottery type | situation. Keep in mind that other countries, especially | Japan, were a lot slower to require pollution controls. | IIRC California and Germany were pretty quick to phase out | leaded gasoline, but most other countries (e.g. France) | were much slower. The safety stuff should be easier to | harmonize for imports, but there's still a lot of bullshit | in DOT regulations (e.g. everything about US spec | headlights). | | IMO a step in the right direction would be to carve out | some exceptions for EV conversions. | IntelMiner wrote: | Why would they be illegal? Surely Oregon has "small cars" | 7speter wrote: | It might be because they dont meet safety standards (being | 25+ years old and tiny) or because its right hand drive... | tgtweak wrote: | I think most people register them out of state for this reason | - Minnesota and Arkansas being the two go-to (also for | bypassing vehicle road-readiness inspections...). | RoyGBivCap wrote: | I wish I'd known this. Oregon's bi-annual "emissions test" | where they hook up the inspection machine to the ODB port and | let the car lie to it is absurd. When I first heard about it | I assumed they'd put some device on the exhaust. _They do | not._ | winrid wrote: | CA is the same way. | | I really wish it was tailpipe based. I liked the PA | emissions laws where you could improve the efficiency of | your vehicle and it would pass. Not so in CA, must be | numbers matching and CARB certified parts/combo. | kitsunesoba wrote: | As someone else living in the PNW, I've read that people in | Oregon permits kei trucks, but won't allow them to be | registered and to work around this, people will register them | in Washington and then bring them down. | ke88y wrote: | _> Really unfortunate situation as these fit a lot of use cases | that would previously require something as big as a gas | guzzling Ford F150 otherwise._ | | What about the Ford Maverick? The only issue is that the bed is | fairly small, but it looks like these minis have small beds and | low towing capacities as well? And Ford makes a hybrid version. | | (Don't misunderstand: I'm not arguing against relaxing the | rules in Oregon.) | tgtweak wrote: | The sales of the Maverick have really made a compelling case | for an even-smaller truck that is one size down. I don't even | think ford thought it would sell that well. The Maverick is | still a giant truck compared to these. | 7speter wrote: | I thought the whole appeal for the maverick was that it was a | hybrid truck that you'd be able to drive around a city (Ford | marketing, itll be fine to drive anywhere probably)? | nluken wrote: | The Ford Maverick is better than most modern pickups, but | still misses the mark. As you mentioned, the bed is | significantly smaller than a 1990 Ranger despite being 6 | inches longer[1]. Honestly the biggest issue I have with | these vehicles is their height, which is a known hazard to | pedestrians[2]. The Maverick doesn't fix that issue. | | [1] https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a36651899/sizing-up- | the-20... [2] | https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2022/03/pedestrians- | incr... | im_down_w_otp wrote: | You could actually probably get this onto a state-wide ballot | as a measure to be voted on in Oregon. The bar to get things on | the ballot isn't particularly high. | rhema wrote: | There's a truck exactly like that a block away from where I live | in my rural town. | Syonyk wrote: | The local Mahindra dealer also seems to be doing a brisk business | with their Roxors - they're almost literally a 1950s Jeep with a | modern diesel engine in them. It's the same market niche - small, | off highway use, utility vehicles. | | And at least out here, you're allowed to run around on the roads | at least some with them to get between fields. | officeplant wrote: | I've seen some very questionable old jeeps cruising around that | I suspect were Mahindra's with a CJ2 tub on them. | SkyPuncher wrote: | It's a shame that Roxor isn't street legal. We live about 2 | miles from our city's downtown. I'd absolutely love to have a | little car that I take into town. | dabluecaboose wrote: | Depends on where you live, there _are_ street-legal kits and | some places allow off-highway driving for side-by-sides. | kylehotchkiss wrote: | I presume you're not in USA - I can't imagine being allowed to | import the Mahindra copy-paste Jeep into USA. Those clones are | so blatant... Wish they added some more Indian flair to them. I | can't believe jeep still bothered to enter the Indian market | with that on the roads! | paxys wrote: | Jeep's design is close to a century old at this point. Why | should it still be legally protected? | yellowapple wrote: | They don't even look all that much like Jeeps. Like yeah, | some similar design elements, but that's true of pretty | much every sedan or crossover or SUV or what have you on | the market today. | dsfyu404ed wrote: | Trademark protections. FCA sued. IIRC Mahindra redesigned | the grill in response. | Syonyk wrote: | I'm very much in the rural mountain west USA. | nicbou wrote: | I've seen what Mahindras can do in Nepal. These things are | amazing. | dabluecaboose wrote: | > they're almost literally a 1950s Jeep with a modern diesel | engine in them | | For those who aren't aware, Mahindra secured a licensing | agreement with Willys in 1947 to make them. They're actually as | close as you can get to a modern Willys Jeep, so much so that | they were sued by Chrysler for infringing on Jeep's trade dress | by looking too much like a Jeep brand Jeep | sircastor wrote: | My wife was really interested in doing this the last time we were | talking about a new vehicle. We looked at a lot of trucks and | micro vans. There are plenty of people who have done it. My | biggest hang ups were related to the variability of laws about | microtrucks across states. Some places I can drive it like any | other vehicle. Others it's limited to non-highway travel and | locality. | | Also not being able to see the vehicle firsthand before | purchasing. | | They're inexpensive though. That's nice. | efields wrote: | I wonder how much of the "Americans want big cars" is just "car | manufacturers _sell_ big cars and not much else" ... then there's | the whole SUV loophole that gets them around emissions regs. | | The Ford Maverick is great and around 20k but at this point I | want 100% electric. | throwway120385 wrote: | I would buy a Maverick tomorrow if it had leaf springs instead | of coils. | iancmceachern wrote: | Along these lines is the Mahindra Jeep knockoff they're about to | start selling here | kubectl_h wrote: | I've seen a few of these in Maine in driveways and yards/fields, | but only recently have I seen a couple on the road. I was | surprised to see them. I believe JDM vans cannot be registered | here but perhaps that's changed recently. | | If made illegal to drive on the roads it's not clear why these | would be preferable to side-by-sides, other than novelty or for | folks that really like to wrench. | cdchn wrote: | Has to be 25+ years old then you can import/register it no | problem. | officeplant wrote: | In the US Kei cars/trucks are handled differently by each | state. We had to vote to get them approved to drive into the | cities here once enough farmers had them and kept begging for | the laws to change. Although for us it stems from having them | imported as farm equipment. | piperswe wrote: | Registering it does depend on the state: I've heard some | states will prevent you from registering them due for | emissions or safety reasons, even though they're federally | legal to import | kubectl_h wrote: | In 2021 Maine cancelled all of the registrations for these | vehicles, so it's a local regulation. Sounds like it was a | wording issues. Looks like there is a bill introduced to fix | this: https://gearjunkie.com/news/maine-bill-reinstate- | revoked-del... | cdchn wrote: | A lot of people are using Vermont registration to get a | title then transferring it to their home state, but I'm not | sure how well that works everywhere. | twalla wrote: | These vehicles (mostly their van equivalents like the Delica and | Hi Ace) are also popular with rural mail carriers since they use | their own vehicles and right hand drive enables them to deposit | mail without leaving the car. | fractallyte wrote: | I used one of these - a van - as my daily driver some years ago. | It was great! A surprising amount of volume in the back, yet | small. It wasn't fast, but it was maneuverable, easy to handle, | and economical. And reliable! It _never_ failed to start, even on | subzero days, after weeks of standing still. | | It was powerful enough to haul serious weight. The engine labored | somewhat, and one could definitely feel the increased momentum of | the vehicle. | | I had some doubts about the front crumple zone - there really | wasn't much that could absorb a head-on impact. But it never | became an issue.. | | If I had similar transport needs again, I'd get one of these vans | without hesitation. | poink wrote: | I'd love a tiny truck as my primary vehicle, but after watching | Doug DeMuro review an imported kei car van | (https://youtu.be/yyTJTUNgsVU) I realized I could never feel | comfortable driving one of these on the highways around here. | | What I _really_ want is something like the Ford F-100 Eluminator | concept. | | https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2021... | officeplant wrote: | We've been importing them to Louisiana for 20+ years now. | Although for the longest time they were only legal to drive like | a farm truck (up to 40 miles from the farm) and only on 55mph or | less roads. They also had limiters installed so they couldn't go | over 55mph, not that its hard to remove the tiny flap of metal | they installed to keep the throttle from opening fully. | | There is one farmer we used to call the used kei truck salesman | because at any given time he has 10-20 of these in his yard for | sale fresh off the import boat. | swalling wrote: | It's not just rural Americans. Japanese 4WD vans, SUVs, and | trucks are super hot among Portland hipsters looking for city- | friendly vehicles for cargo or road tripping. There are some | importers here locally that this is all they do now, like | https://www.javan-imports.com/ The other highly desirable vehicle | among this crowd are the J60 series Land Cruisers from the 80s, | for fashion reasons more than functional ones though. | nyx wrote: | The 25-year import rule here, which bans Americans from importing | vehicles from other countries unless they're 25+ years old, is | just awful for those of us who would be interested in driving | small, efficient foreign cars. | | It would be great to live completely car-free, but absent major | changes to how we plan our cities, it's just a sad reality that | cars are a necessary ingredient to life in the vast majority of | America. To cope with this, I'd love to be able to import a kei | car or van from Japan, or micro-sized European city cars, or even | some of the very small EV city cars that we see in China... but I | just can't, unless I want an overpriced pile of scrap from the | 1990s. | | It's all so much worse when you realize that the 25-year rule is | a holdover from a grey-market import scare of the mid-1980s[0]: | European carmakers, namely Mercedes, BMW, and Porsche, were | having trouble in the US with people importing European models of | their cars. There were some valid concerns around inconsistent | modifications for US safety standards, but the main issue was | clearly that these grey-market imports were cheaper than buying a | US model from a dealer, so profits were being missed. Instead of | fixing the pricing discrepancy, they just successfully lobbied | the government to enact this draconian 25-year ban, and so to | this day I can't have a 2020s Japanese kei car shipped to a US | port at my expense because it'd be illegal to register it. | | [0] https://jalopnik.com/the-25-year-import-rules-history-is- | mor... | deelowe wrote: | That rule ain't changing unfortunately. Regulatory capture is | STRONG with automotive and the US sees it as a matter of | national security (car makers would be pivoted to other ares in | times of war). | nostromo wrote: | This isn't regulatory capture or protectionism. | | Half of all cars sold in the US are imported. | | Toyota, a Japanese company, is the most popular brand of car | sold in the US. | | So, yes, you can import cars all you want, they just need to | be safe and not pollute. These cars do not meet those | requirements, so you can't import them. | | If you didn't block them as imports, we'd have lots of people | just go to Mexico and buy highly-polluting vehicles to save | money, and our problem with smog in the border states would | be much worse. | civilized wrote: | > You can import cars all you want, they just need to be | safe and not pollute. These cars do not meet those | requirements, so you can't import them. | | This is clearly untrue. If this were the case, the rule | wouldn't make an exception for 25+ year old cars. | nostromo wrote: | That exception exists for car collectors. | [deleted] | birdyrooster wrote: | So what you are saying is Tesla is building China's future | factories for armor. | __MatrixMan__ wrote: | How easily could they retool for an event like that? I think | I've just hatched a conspiracy theory for why all our | vehicles are absurdly sized... | asveikau wrote: | I thought the standard conspiracy theory was that they | started making them larger to avoid environmental | regulation (which is pretty ironic). | | Here's the first google result for "large cars regulation | loophole", looks like an interesting read: | https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-wants-to-close-the-suv- | lo... Edit: prior HN discussion here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35609521 | Our_Benefactors wrote: | More easily than if the factory doesn't exist at all. | seizethecheese wrote: | Check out US history during WWII. Auto manufacturing was | even pivoted to airplanes. Things must be more specialized | now but I assume it could still happen quickly. | | My personal belief is this also explains American bias | towards planes over rail. | woooooo wrote: | Every country's history in WW2. Even Italy had tanks made | by Fiat. | moltar wrote: | You can still find plenty of amazing vehicles, in great | condition in the South of Europe. The weather there is great | and cars don't deteriorate as much. I see plenty of Toyotas and | Hondas from pre 97 models. They still cost around 3-4 K EUR | probably because they are such an easy maintenance that they | will still drive for another decade and that's priced in. | jmrm wrote: | Please, don't buy our cars here in Spain. Most of people | here, specially young people, cannot afford a new car with | our 1100EUR/month after taxes of mininal wage and our | 350EUR/room /month (in cheap places) on the flats we usually | live. | | With that situation, we usually buy cars before 2005 or so, | and we pay those 3k to 4k euros in those, and usually with | over 250 000 km (155 000 miles). Depending on the model, they | even can be more expensive than people would think: A late | 90s Nissan Terrano would cost from 6k to 7k, and my current | car, a Korean one that cost about 13k in 2012, now cost from | 9k to 11k (unless it has too much mileage or isn't in a | decent shape). | Glawen wrote: | It is just cargo cult. The value of these old Toyota and | Honda makes no sense. I was looking to buy an old Toyota | because of the hype on internet, but there are not a lot of | them being in Europe, and 70% of them had an engine issue | (threads holding head gasket were missing, common issue on | aluminium engine). | | At one point, I pondered buying a Toyota previa with this | head gasket issue for 3K and planed to repair it myself. | Fortunately I got my sense back and bought a Renault Scenic | with no issue at all, 2K and I managed to have also the | timing belt replaced. Yes, internet thinks that because it is | a French car, it will crumble. Well internet, so far it had | no issue and its head gasket is intact. | chair6 wrote: | We love our quirky, slow 1993 Mitsubishi JB500 campervan | (https://www.instagram.com/finnthejb500/), but the experience | is not for everyone. We were able to register it in Washington | without too much hassle. It definitely pays to do some research | and try to find a local-ish mechanic willing to work on them | before you make the purchase. | inferiorhuman wrote: | The 25-year import rule here, which bans Americans from | importing vehicles from other countries unless they're | 25+ years old | | That's _not_ what the rule is. That 's the end result because | nobody wants to spend money to get a foreign market car to meet | the relevant safety and emissions standards. | nyx wrote: | Yeah, that's completely right, but as you said in another | comment, there's some real bullshit in the FMVSS that to me, | a complete layperson, seems like it has the sole effect of | blocking the certification of perfectly safe and clean modern | vehicles from other advanced nations. | | Of course we shouldn't be allowing people to import some | pollution-spewing deathtrap that doesn't have seatbelts--the | FMVSS regulations do exist for a reason--but I think we | should be taking a more critical look at our regulations, | especially as compared to other places at the same | socioeconomic level. | inferiorhuman wrote: | perfectly safe and clean modern vehicles from other | advanced nations | | A lot of what's being discussed are neither perfectly safe | nor clean by American standards. | | The UK, for instance, allows pretty much anything with | wheels to be registered (e.g. the Peel). Euro NCAP is | merely advisory, you can still sell/buy a death trap. | Pollution as well. Want an early 90s Figaro or S-Cargo or a | late 00s Hijet? Those were sold without cats or fuel | injection. Want something cheap and Euro? Cool. The cheap | shit is often cheap because it pollute so much it can't be | driven in city centers. | | A lot of the bellyaching is over cars that the | _manufacturers_ couldn 't justify fixing up to meet | American standards. | eduction wrote: | You can import new tiny cars and drive them all you want on a | farm or private grounds, you just can't take them on roads if | they don't meat road safety standards. | | Even the advocate highlighted in this article (Economist) | admits his would probably be a "death trap" on a busy highway. | | Maybe the US should create separate standards for city streets | and roads with low speed limits, that could be a good way to | bring down vehicle sizes. But just allowing these things just | anywhere seems like a recipe for increased fatalities. For | every HN reader who would use theirs wisely there are 10 | average Americans who would risk maiming. | kube-system wrote: | > Maybe the US should create separate standards for city | streets and roads with low speed limits, that could be a good | way to bring down vehicle sizes. | | They already have! | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-speed_vehicle | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neighborhood_Electric_Vehicl. | .. | | But it's a hard sell when the US has so many high speed | roads. | JKCalhoun wrote: | States vary. Some disallow them on all highways, others allow | them on State highways, not Federal.... | nostromo wrote: | What would be the point of safety and emissions regulations if | we let everyone bypass them by importing vehicles from abroad? | | The vehicles meeting the requirements wouldn't be competitive | on price because they'd be playing by a different set of rules. | shawabawa3 wrote: | Why would foreign vehicles be exempt from safety and | emissions regulations? | anonymouskimmer wrote: | Because vehicles over a certain age are grandfather- | exempted. | joshspankit wrote: | Seems better to just enforce the same emissions regulations | on imported vehicles | bragr wrote: | Besides 25 year limitation, the regulations are a main pain | here as it can be difficult to comply with the letter of | multiple overlapping regulations, and have the | certifications for those. I know headlights end up being a | pain for people trying to import cars to the US as all | headlights must meet DOT standards. Rinse and repeat with | every regulation affecting every part of the car. | taeric wrote: | I believe the point is that older vehicles are exempt from | newer rules, regardless of where they are from. Is why I | can legally drive my 2000 truck, despite it almost | certainly being less than up to current standards. | | I think there is a reasonable logic that scrapping the | truck would probably be pretty bad for the environment, | such that some of the standards are "water under the | bridge", as it were. The rest of the logic almost certainly | falls on the numbers just not mattering? I don't know. | linguae wrote: | California has an answer to that: imported cars are generally | required to meet the same emissions standards as cars | intended for the domestic market: | | https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-registration/new- | regis... | | From the California DMV's web page on direct imported | vehicles: "If your direct foreign import vehicle was not | originally manufactured to meet California emissions | standards and DOT FMVSS, the vehicle cannot be registered in | California, unless the vehicle is modified and tested under | CARB's direct import program." | | Based on research that I done years ago, my understanding is | that the modifications required to get many foreign vehicles | to conform to California's emission standards, combined with | the testing fees (which is far more expensive than the cost | of a traditional biennial smog check), make it prohibitively | expensive for casual buyers to legally register imported | vehicles in California. | | Some people get around this by registering their vehicles in | other states where only the EPA 25 year rule applies; | occasionally in California I do see cars with their steering | wheels on the right side with Nevada or Oregon license | plates. However, California generally requires its residents | to have their vehicles registered in California. | | One thing I'm curious about is whether California allows | direct imported vehicles to be converted to run on battery- | backed electric motors as a legal modification. If this is | the case, then the vehicle would certainly pass the emissions | test. | triceratops wrote: | It's even less likely that a 25 year old vehicle will meet | current safety and emissions regulations. | nostromo wrote: | The amount of those vehicles will obviously be limited. | | Removing it would allow people to buy cheap cars in places | like Mexico, that have loose emissions standards, and drive | them around California, which has some of the most | stringent emissions standards in the world. Not to mention | the safety requirements issues... | triceratops wrote: | So only allow imports from countries with emissions and | safety standards equal to or greater than American ones. | | I don't understand why the age of the vehicle should | matter. | inferiorhuman wrote: | That's already the case. You _can_ legally import a | modern kei car if you can modify it to meet relevant | safety and emissions standards. You can import any modern | car. I imported a 2001 BMW from Canada a few years back | and it was a breeze because it already had the EPA | stickers and BMW NA signed off on the safety stuff. You | can import a non-compliant car (e.g. some carburetted kei | car with minimal safety equipment) if you bring it up to | the US standards that were in effect at the time. Nobody | wants to bother does not mean that nobody _can_. | | The 25 (well I think DOT is 20 years and EPA is 25 or | vice versa) means you can import shit without it having | to meet relevant federal standards. States (e.g. | California) will still want to see proof it doesn't | pollute too much, and CARB tests are _expensive_. Sates | like Washington will let you register pretty much | anything with wheels which is how you see a lot of non- | US. market cars for sale out here with Washington plates. | throwway120385 wrote: | More importantly it also allows us to import reasonably- | sized 4WD trucks from other countries instead of having | to decide between a mini-van or a station wagon. | FanaHOVA wrote: | > micro-sized European city cars | | I see plenty of Smarts and Fiat 500s in San Francisco | voisin wrote: | I wish the actual story was "US manufacturers announce line of | small, Japanese style pickup trucks" | | Importing adds friction both up front and for ongoing sourcing of | parts and maintenance. Just give us some options for local pickup | trucks utilizing existing repair facilities! Instead everyone | bitches about truck drivers having such large vehicles, when | that's all that's on offer here! | elboru wrote: | RAM sells a small truck in Mexico called RAM 700 and it's | getting popular for work purposes (specially in urban areas). I | have no idea why it's not being sold in the US market. | | https://www.motor1.com/news/447996/2021-ram-700-debut/ | paxys wrote: | Kinda ironic that big city dwellers are buying larger and larger | trucks every year just to take them on grocery shopping runs | while rural farm workers are moving in the opposite direction for | actual hauling. | Marsymars wrote: | I don't know how much they're moving in the opposite | direction... my dad was a rural beekeeper for many years and | had a series of compact pickups (Toyota pickup, Nissan | hardbody, Chevy S10)... and then he changed careers around the | time you could no longer buy new compact pickups in NA. I | expect that the number of compact pickups in rural areas hasn't | actually been going _up_ in the years since. | rsync wrote: | While you are correct that urban Americans LARPing ranchers | are, indeed, buying larger and larger trucks I don't see | _actual_ farmers /ranchers downsizing. | | I live on a working ranch and while our truck is very _boring_ | ( "work truck" - basically a fleet vehicle with no options) it | is still quite large as it has an 8' bed, etc. | | I think we could make good use of a battery powered vehicle | with a small cargo area and we definitely make good use of the | aforementioned full-sized truck ... but I don't find these | mini-pickups appealing or interesting. | wepple wrote: | The article cites someone who purchased a kei truck instead of | a side-by-side, so it doesn't imply that rural folks are moving | away from trucks. | | If anything, the urban folks are buying bigger cars/trucks and | rural folks are buying bigger sxs/ATVs ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-04-20 23:00 UTC)