[HN Gopher] Google Mars (2005) ___________________________________________________________________ Google Mars (2005) Author : belter Score : 160 points Date : 2023-04-22 11:17 UTC (11 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.google.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.google.com) | lnxg33k1 wrote: | I didn't know Mars had the same streets state of my hometown | thefounder wrote: | For some reasons steet view is not working! Hope they fix it | soon! | belter wrote: | Privacy rules, they have the same in Germany. | FinnKuhn wrote: | Just wanted to point out that legally nothing is stopping | Google from releasing Street View in Germany as far as I | know. Maybe they will do so soon, considering that Apple Look | Around is available for most of Germany | rf15 wrote: | Street View is also available in Germany as far as I can | tell. | tazjin wrote: | Only in the initial cities in which they started doing it | before the backlash got so large that they abandoned it. | | A few months later, when Microsoft or whoever did their | take on it, nobody cared anymore because it wasn't about | principles. | pgeorgi wrote: | It was more of a media campaign, ad brokers trying to | kneecap that other ad broker. Microsoft wasn't in the ad | business back in the day, so no threat to media | businesses. | ncphil wrote: | Street view for Google Mars. I think the atmosphere is | too thin for those photo-taking cars to run very far. | That and the lack of any streets on Mars. | | At least in the unclassified imagery that has been made | public... (cue eerie music) | belter wrote: | https://support.google.com/maps/thread/165997335/when- | will-g... | flaviut wrote: | Check this newer version: | https://www.google.com/maps/space/mars/@17.5325978,179.82741... | | They also have many other planets and celestial bodies here. | rixrax wrote: | Search located Pathfinder without problems[0]. But not the Ares | III landing site[1]... | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Pathfinder [1] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Martian_(film) | FR10 wrote: | Having recently finished the book (awesome btw), Acidalia | Planitia, Pathfinder and Schiaparelli where my first 3 queries | butz wrote: | They should partner up with NASA and add "Street view". | tempodox wrote: | My summer house on Mars is private, I don't want a Street View | image of it. | [deleted] | timur21 wrote: | Always wanted this | amelius wrote: | I want to select A on Earth and B on Mars, then click | "Directions". | aaron695 wrote: | [dead] | belter wrote: | https://www.google.com/sky/ | | https://www.google.com/moon/ | Ajedi32 wrote: | Mars is also built in to Google Maps now: | https://www.google.com/maps/space/mars/ | lib-dev wrote: | It would be cool if they updated Google Sky to use JWST images. | HopenHeyHi wrote: | Woah, check out this page: | https://www.google.com/sky/about.html | | 2011 in the footer. Remnants of the old google of a by-gone | era. Simultaneously feels both like yesterday and an eternity | ago. | | The video is from 2008: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX9MeF2Au9c | | I bet whoever made this is no longer there and it has been | forgotten about internally. | belter wrote: | The comments from 15 years ago are even more interesting. | Avicebron wrote: | What's that quote about dying a hero vs living long enough | to see yourself become the villain? | LoganDark wrote: | The prophecy. | pinewurst wrote: | Isn't that Google in a nutshell? | tazjin wrote: | There was a time where employees could get paths under | google.com/ for semi-personal projects. | p1mrx wrote: | Seems weird that the "Mountains" link doesn't label Olympus Mons. | It's the tallest mountain in the solar system. | pfannkuchen wrote: | If Google still had a sense of humor they would do Google Flat | Earth for April Fool's Day one of these years. Complete with | perimeter ice wall and an announcement that scientists have made | an amazing discovery about the true shape of the Earth. Easter | egg of infinite turtle stack supporting the Earth Plane if you do | 3D view and flip it over. Alas... | zokier wrote: | If you want higher res, check out the recently released Murray | Lab CTX global mosaic: | | https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/new-interactive-mosaic-uses... | | https://murray-lab.caltech.edu/CTX/index.html | throwaway199956 wrote: | Any idea of high res images from Tianwen-1, as per reports they | have imaged most of Mars surface, and being a more recent | mission, may have better camera. | zokier wrote: | Found a chinese map here: | https://moon.bao.ac.cn/Mars/index/index.html | | From the looks of it, it might be Tianwen-1 MoRIC (100m/px) | data. But I'm not sure, I always have difficulty navigating | non-NASA data sources. | | I don't think the higher resolution HiRIC (up to 2.5m/px) | data is publicly available. I don't also know what sort of | coverage they have for it. | | But in general it's not just having the data, stitching a | global mosaic is a non-trivial effort. Afaik the Murray Lab | mosaic took several years of work to make. | | There is also HRSC from ESA that has been imaging Mars with | fairly good resolution/coverage. | | And finally also UAE Hope mission has produced global map, | but I haven't been able to find their full-resolution data. | https://nyuad.nyu.edu/en/news/latest-news/science-and- | techno... | tempodox wrote: | Yay, great! Here's the raw mosaic, make your browser full- | screen for this: | | https://murray-lab.caltech.edu/CTX/V01/SceneView/MurrayLabCT... | pcurve wrote: | Wonder why they haven't killed this yet. I guess hardly anyone | knows this exists | marricks wrote: | It's been out for over 15 years now, you'd hope they'd add some | street view... | SergeAx wrote: | What, no Street View? Why? | nickcotter wrote: | I thought I was about to read that it had been discontinued. Glad | to see it hasn't! | cabirum wrote: | You have 30 days to pack your things and move to another | planet. You remaining Google Mars subscription will be refunded | to your account. | nabla9 wrote: | Google data scraping is not that good. Olympus Mons is not listed | in mountains as other volcanoes. Feature: | Olympus Mons Type: Mons, montes | jonnycomputer wrote: | street view? | Aldipower wrote: | Wow, this old site is exceptionally fast! | m3kw9 wrote: | No walking directions? | patwolf wrote: | I miss the days when I'd see a HN post to a Google project and be | excited to check it out. | | I don't necessarily fault Google--they have to do what makes | sense for their business. But I wish, at the very least from a PR | perspective, more companies would create cool things without | worrying about whether they can be monetized. | dr_kiszonka wrote: | I do miss it too. What is the point in having so much money if | you can't do exciting, useful, and cool stuff. | capableweb wrote: | The basic equation: | | - Small, nimble, fun, fast, low amount of cash, interesting | work, ease to deploy | | - Big, fat, tedious, slow, extensive supply of cash, maybe | some interesting work at most, pain to get anything deployed | cdibona wrote: | Noel and Michael launched mars and moon in about three weeks | after starting as 'interns' under me, as that was the fastest | path to a badge. They're both still at Google, I think. (As | employees!) | | Someday I'll write up the story, but that was a heck of a fun | project! | aix1 wrote: | Wow, things... have changed. | | Thanks for sharing. | SimonSays321 wrote: | [dead] | smallnix wrote: | > (As employees!) | | Cracked me up | foobarbecue wrote: | I've always been really disapointed that google let their | planetary maps stagnate. | | I work (~5% of my work week) on https://trek.nasa.gov/ . Our | front page sucks, but the individual map browsers are quite rich | in terms of available layers and tools. Our UI is... not | optimized for discoverability, but there's a lot there. Mars is | at https://trek.nasa.gov/mars/ | dndn1 wrote: | How do they pick a 0 elevation? | lmc wrote: | Good question! it's the average. | https://mars.nasa.gov/mgs/faqs/faq_sci.html | ml_basics wrote: | Check out the scale, those are very tall peaks in the centre at | 21km! | mock-possum wrote: | weird that there's no map scale provided - like a "___ = 1km" | legend thingy | | also the silver/gold infrared map reminds me of Brinstar in the | original Metroid. | breck wrote: | I had never really paid attention to the fact that all the | craters are round. If anyone else is just noticing that, this | explains it: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-are- | impact-cr... | tppiotrowski wrote: | Someone once told me that Mars has better elevation data than | Earth. Maybe it's the quality of the orbiters or maybe it's the | fact that there is less atmospheric interference and you can use | LiDAR vs radar? Can anyone confirm? | | bdon, if you're reading this we need a protomaps archive for the | moon and Mars :) | kvdveer wrote: | I thought that earth elevation data is unreliable in forested | areas, as vegetation hides the true elevation of those areas. | That's probably not a significant problem on Mars... | tppiotrowski wrote: | I think vegetation is an issue with LiDAR but my | understanding is that radar penetrates down to the ground. | tmoravec wrote: | My guess would be that they meant the oceans. No water = better | elevation data. | godber wrote: | Hahaha, that was a busy weekend when this launched in like | 2005-2006. I was one of the sysadmins of the website with the | THEMIS images. Google promoted it directly below the search box. | Which made my web servers 3 clicks away from Google's front page. | I spent the weekend cannibalizing compute nodes from one of our | clusters to work as caching proxies. It all worked out pretty | well. | foobarbecue wrote: | Very cool, thanks for sharing. It's fascinating to me that | google has put so little effort into their planetary maps since | an inital burst of interest, but hasn't killed them yet. Is it | just "below the radar"? I guess I assumed they would have some | management process that kills zombie projects... don't they? | imajoredinecon wrote: | From my experience working there, killing a cute toy project | like this takes some breaking change in a dependency _plus_ | nobody willing to spend a few hours every now and then to | maintain it. Both of these are basically luck of the draw, so | it's not surprising to have stuff like this stick around for | this long. | [deleted] | jsmcgd wrote: | Here's another 3D Mars surface explorer: https://murray- | lab.caltech.edu/CTX/V01/SceneView/MurrayLabCT... | | Edit: Searching through my notes, I realised I've been down this | rabbit hole before. Here are some more of the same: | | https://explore-mars.esri.com/ | | http://www.mars3dmap.com | | https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/24881/planet-mars-3d-model/ | foobarbecue wrote: | don't forget Eyes on the Solar System, WorldWind, Cosmographia, | JMars, and USGS PILOT | weird-eye-issue wrote: | No directions? | cryptoz wrote: | Always love playing with this especially after reading Red Mars | and recognizing a lot of place names. | | But also sad google hasn't even kept the styling updated to their | branding or added any features. | dchest wrote: | I love the fact that they haven't updated styling: this one is | clear and fast. | xchkr1337 wrote: | I don't think that's a good point to critizice Google for. | Unlike many other websites, the Google homepage has always | remained clear and fast, even after multiple redesigns. | holoduke wrote: | Except it keeps focusing on the input screen and opens my | keyboard all the time. | booleandilemma wrote: | I don't understand how Google could have this and yet they don't | have high res images of the Earth's oceans. | XorNot wrote: | The data doesn't exist. You can't map oceans from space like | you can land. | silvertaza wrote: | If the visible map here is gray, why is it red-ish in the sky | looking at it with the naked eye? | willidiots wrote: | https://wehoville.com/2013/01/07/why-are-images-from-space-p... | zokier wrote: | That article feels overly dismissive. Notably more recent | Mars missions such as Tianwen and Hope do have normal bayer | cameras onboard producing color images. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-04-22 23:00 UTC)