[HN Gopher] Snapchat sees spike in 1-star reviews as users pan t... ___________________________________________________________________ Snapchat sees spike in 1-star reviews as users pan the 'My AI' feature Author : mmq Score : 102 points Date : 2023-04-24 16:18 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (techcrunch.com) (TXT) w3m dump (techcrunch.com) | htrp wrote: | I wonder if this was part of the deal to get early access to a | lot of the new openai models? | | OpenAI gets real human data from snap and snap gets to say | they're an AI company. | root_axis wrote: | The experience just sucks, it's a glorified ChatGPT wrapper with | all the "As an AI language model..." warts. The stilted | mechanical speech of ChatGPT does not resonate with the snapchat | user demographic. Snapchat is a wild place, 80% of the real | conversations on that platform would be flagged in red TOS | violation text were it pasted into ChatGPT. | radicaldreamer wrote: | A lot of these AI tools are going to be grafted on to existing | products without thinking through user consent or the overall | experience so companies can show that they're "AI forward" | pram wrote: | It's not even new, that's what's crazy. How many people wanted | shit like Cortana? It was finally mercifully killed but here we | are yet again. | klyrs wrote: | Microsoft Bob was a commercial failure, so they introduced | Clippy to Word for free. Surprise surprise, people still | didn't want it. | epistasis wrote: | Right now AI is a lot like VR headsets. A really cool tech trick | but not something that most people want to use regularly. Let the | interested early adopter at it, but forcing this on to users will | not go very well. It's just too creepy. | | Silicon Valley got pretty lucky with figuring out social media, | but I think it still does not understand most people very well. | jutrewag wrote: | Hard disagree. Anecdotally, everyone in my friend group uses | chatGPT/Bing many times a day. | jrpt wrote: | I couldn't disagree more. It's clear AI is going to have huge | impacts on the world. It's just getting started though. | | Imagine every time you call support, instead of having some | annoying rules-based automated system, you're having a natural | conversation with an AI that is fluent in your language. That's | possible with today's technology, it just hasn't been built out | and deployed yet. | epistasis wrote: | Even if AI has huge impacts on the world, and does a lot of | great things, that in no way negates my point. | | Right now, almost nobody have an interest in AI chat bots. | Even fewer want to have it in SnapChat. And honestly I really | don't want an AI bot for customer service, especially at the | current stage of tech dev, because the AI bots are completely | unreliable and hallucinate and lie regularly. (Which is to | say that I heartily doubt your assertion that current AI tech | would enable customer service bots that are useful. They | produce wonderful prose, but semantics and action are not | there, and we don't have training datasets yet to enforce | accuracy in prose or action) | | So let's say they become useful, great. But today they are | still a VR headset, something that's fun to experience for a | bit, but which I don't want to be part of my daily | experience. It's a novelty, not a useful tool, for nearly | everyone out there today. | | Make it useful, attractive to most people, and we are in a | different regime, and forcing features like this on all your | users might be seen as a positive rather than a negative. | latexr wrote: | Imagine instead that you could speak to a human. One with the | authority and skills to truly help you. _That_ is the dream, | not a less shitty robot. | throwway120385 wrote: | Yeah I love companies that just put a real human on the | phone who knows what they're talking about. All of the | problems I'd want a support number for are impossible for | an AI to solve, and putting a speaking AI in between me and | a real human would just annoy the crap out of me. | | I bet Comcast is working on it as we speak. | rchaud wrote: | It's closer to blockchain. Unprofitable companies are rushing | to jam in something, anything in there so they have something | to tell Wall St on the earnings call. | hbn wrote: | I don't know how you can think that. Random companies | scrambling to get in on the hype to look good for investors is | one thing. But the actual good applications coming out of AI | are already getting integrated into people's daily workflows. | ChatGPT is a genuinely useful product to tons of people. | | Most people I know who bought a VR headset on the other hand | thought it was cool for a couple weeks then it was never | touched again. | mhh__ wrote: | AI is already way more important than VR. I have had _a lot_ of | people tell me that they are already making serious | economically-impactful use of AI both personally and | professionally, many others are the same. | | The failure of Snapchat here is doing AI for the sake of AI. | delecti wrote: | My most successful use of AI so far was that Bard's answer | was so useless that it made me realize the actual problem. | Invoking Cunningham's Law isn't really a success on its own | merit though. | satvikpendem wrote: | What was the question and what did it answer? For me as a | startup founder, it's cutting down my coding time to 1/4 of | what it would have been, since I can ask ChatGPT clarifying | questions and ask it for direct code examples. | htormey wrote: | I disagree. ChatGPT reached 100 million MAUs 2 months after | launch. It's one of the fastest-growing consumer applications | in history. | | Anecdotally, lots of my non technical friends (and me) are | using it for everything from cooking to learning a foreign | language. | | Lots of my technical friends are using it for side projects on | the weekends. I'd say it's the top new technology all of them | are working with or incorporating into their workflows. | | I and all of my teammates are using it to help us write sql and | answer basic programming questions. | | It's clearly a way bigger deal than VR right now. | | The problem here seems to be that Snap rammed this feature into | their product in a really awkward fashion that doesn't make | sense for their users. Hence the backlash. | | source: https://arstechnica.com/information- | technology/2023/02/chatg... | ______ wrote: | Last night I was typing on Google: "How do I get (rid of wax from | pots and pans)" and the top auto-suggestion at that point was | "How do I get rid of my ai on snapchat" | | Must be a big issue if they own the "How do I get" SEO :) | inadequatespace wrote: | How... did you get wax on the pots and pans in the first place? | Making candles or something? | hangonhn wrote: | High carbon pans come from the factory with a wax coating to | prevent rust during storage and shipment. Before you can | season the pan you need to remove the wax coating first. | treeman79 wrote: | Wax has fun uses. | ______ wrote: | Making mushroom logs! | | I cut down a few invasive trees recently (Norway Maples). If | you inoculate the branches and logs with spores of a mushroom | that you want (in my case, shiitake) during the first few | weeks after cutting, it will fruit with that for a few years. | It's a fun DIY project, and a way to reuse trees. | | To prevent unwanted mushrooms from the environment from | colonizing, you seal the holes you drill, as well as the end | the ends of the logs, with cheese wax - which I had heated in | a crock pot, hence the need for cleaning that up. | homerowilson wrote: | Very cool. I regularly plug logs with various spawn (lately | hericium) and have had good luck covering the plug with | natural clay instead of wax, which unfortunately I have | tons of in my yard. In my case, the cover is mostly to | prevent rodents from eating the mushroom spawn, which they | seem to love. | horttemppa wrote: | So how did you get rid of the wax? I was inoculating logs a | year ago and the jars are still waiting for clean up. | coolspot wrote: | Answer from Snapchat My AI: Mix baking soda and water | into a paste, then use it to scrub the wax off. | usrusr wrote: | Oh great, now I wonder what the mushrooms would suggest | for getting rid of Google | wlesieutre wrote: | Personally I'd try Bar Keepers Friend | ajb wrote: | Always been a bit suspicious of that since it contains | oxalic acid, which is toxic. I assume it's water soluble | enough to get rid of easily before you use the surfaces | for food though. | robinsonb5 wrote: | The traditional method of getting wax out of clothes is a | hot iron and brown paper. I daresay the same principle - | melt the wax and soak it up - could be applied to other | surfaces. | Blackthorn wrote: | Haven't tried this specific instance but kerosene (which | is the major component of WD40) is a great solvent for | waxes. | nrjames wrote: | I made an unholy mess with wax on pans yesterday, trying to | melt down old comb from a deadout bee hive in a hot water | bath. | | Word to the wise: go to the thrift store and pick up some old | pots and spoons before attempting this. | sieste wrote: | > They're surprised to learn that Snapchat's AI knows their | location, for example, and can use that information in its | responses, even if they're not sharing their location on the Snap | Map. In a way, the AI bot is surfacing the level of personal data | collection that social media companies do in the background, and | putting it directly in front of the consumer. As it turns out, | that's not a great selling point | | So the 1 star is for inducing cognitive dissonance. I shall not | be reminded that you know where I am and what I do 24/7! | parker_mountain wrote: | I wouldn't say it's cognitive dissonance, but rather, it's | people becoming informed that their (implied) privacy choices | aren't being respected. | | The (albeit false) implication, is that when you're not sharing | your location, /you're not sharing your location/. | | These people likely believe that their location is private and | only used when they /explicitly/ enable location sharing | features. To us, that's obvious - to the lay person, it's not. | It's an extremely common (and gross) dark pattern. | onepointsixC wrote: | I imagine that brazenly lying about it doesn't help. | JohnMakin wrote: | Snapchat continues its nearly decade-long habit of forcing | changes on users that they hate. Remember the massive UI redesign | that saw them lose millions of users ? | https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/7/17661878/snapchat-earnings... | or when they turned on everyone's location sharing and made it | opt-out? | Chernobog wrote: | Or the 3D Bitmojis. My 2D one looks awesome, but the equivalent | 3D version looks like a sex offender... | milsorgen wrote: | I was shocked to find them using bitmojis at all. I find them | terribly off putting visually. Not a big deal of course, but | until I installed Snapchat I hadn't seen one in years. | Karawebnetwork wrote: | I have a feeling that My AI's weird avatar is one of the | many variables as to why he was pushed back by users. It is | a smug looking character with purple skin. To me, the | avatar enters the uncanny valley. | Urgo wrote: | Snap (then Snapchat) acquired them back in 2016 | | https://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/tech- | news/snapcha... | SnowProblem wrote: | The redesign was also forced internally and a lot of OGs left | including the long time VP of Eng Tim Sehn who either pushed | back too hard against Evan or saw the writing on the wall or | both. Lots of internal politicking, late hours, and then | layoffs the next year, for a project many of us weren't sold | on. Not fun. The thing was up until then I think Snap's top- | down design-driven culture was a strength and supported its | innovation. It works until it doesn't. I hear things have | softened since that period. | rchaud wrote: | But every socmed site/app does this. You'll never find user | research that says "I want to see more strangers I _don 't_ | follow on my feed". It's not for the user, it's for advertisers | that need users to spend more time in the app. | charcircuit wrote: | The success of YouTube and TikTok proves there is demand for | content from people that have not been followed. Most of the | content people watch on these platforms are from people they | are not following. People gain value from seeing content that | is relevant to them. | tech234a wrote: | > or when they turned on everyone's location sharing and made | it opt-out? | | Possible related article: | https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/23/15864552/snapchat-snap-ma... | satvikpendem wrote: | It doesn't really matter, they made up the DAU within a year | [0] and even back in 2018 had grown their revenue despite | lowered DAU numbers, from your link. | | > _The rest of the company's financials exceeded investors' | expectations. Revenue increased 44 percent year-over-year, from | $182 million in the second quarter of last year to $262 million | this year._ | | [0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/545967/snapchat-app- | dau/ | Urgo wrote: | I think the issue is way simpler. I don't think its a backlash | against AI as the article makes it out to be. The "My AI" 'user' | is pinned to the top of your chat list. You can not remove it. If | they simply gave users an option to turn it on or off the problem | would be solved. | teaearlgraycold wrote: | Or let it fall down the list naturally as it gets unused as is | the default behavior. | malfist wrote: | That is not the default behavior for the AI. It's pinned at | the top of your chats. Nothing moves it down, and at least on | my phone, you can't get rid of it. | teaearlgraycold wrote: | That's what I'm saying. It should follow the default | behavior of other chats. | delecti wrote: | I think that was exactly their point. Let the default | behavior _for everything else_ also apply to the AI. | exeldapp wrote: | I second this. I've never used it, talk to friends, and yet | it's still sitting there at the top. | soylentcola wrote: | That's what happened to the Bing "AI" button they added to | Swiftkey recently. | | Only using it on my Pixel so I only saw the Play Store reviews | alongside a few articles online. But they were pummeled with 1* | reviews and a week later...no more Bing icon that I can't | remove from my otherwise fine keyboard. | rchaud wrote: | For Snap users, it's a distinction without a difference. All | they see is some feature they don't want that contains the | label "AI". | Urgo wrote: | Is it though? Browsing through the Android reviews 9 out of | 10 that mentioned "AI" were complaining about not being able | to remove it or that you need to pay for snapchat+ to remove | it. Pretty sure if they either gave an easy option to not | have it pinned, or as teaearlgraycold mentioned in another | reply, just have it fall down the list naturally there | wouldn't be an issue at all. | usrusr wrote: | They succeeded in reminding people like me that Snapchat | exists. I'd call that a massive success that an option like | that would have prevented. | tech234a wrote: | "Snapchat+ subscribers receive early access to new My AI | features, and have the ability to unpin or remove My AI from | their Chat feed." | | Also worth noting that as a free user I have been able to | remove it from the list that is shown on the web version of | Snapchat [1], but that change doesn't carry over to the mobile | app. | | [1]: https://web.snapchat.com/ | latexr wrote: | > I don't think its a backlash against AI as the article makes | it out to be. | | That's not what I understood from the article. They gave | several reasons and _the first one_ was the same as yours: | | > But many Snapchat users aren't thrilled with My AI, which | appeared inside their app without warning or their consent. | | > To some extent, it's the chatbot's placement that's the cause | of concern. | | > My AI is pinned to the top of users' Chat feed inside the app | and can't be unpinned, blocked or removed, as other | conversations can be. | GaryNumanVevo wrote: | That's certainly one way to get a high conversion rate | happycube wrote: | It's a poor use of AI really that doesn't add anything to the | product, and was instead clearly there to add something to the | stock price to cash in on the hype. | | If it was actually opt-in and helped people make better snaps... | | (I'm well outside their key demo now, but their push messages | seem out of touch even taking that into account. No, I'm not | interested in lenses or adding people I've never had any _reason_ | to hear of...) | | edit: Thinking about it a bit more, after their initial thing | they've generally been missing boats... they _could_ have made a | nice TikTok clone with the snap map as a bonus - but most of the | vaguely interesting snaps on the map don 't have user info, and | subscribing to the interesting users seems bugged on top of that. | gumballindie wrote: | > Many are also pushing back at the fact that removing the My AI | from their Chat feed requires a Snapchat+ subscription. | | Probably collecting training data without their consent, as is | the norm with ai products. | SyzygistSix wrote: | I support the removal of Snapchat. | gqcwwjtg wrote: | It'd be less annoying if it weren't so dumb. It won't admit to | being an AI and I got it to tell me its prompt first try: | | The first thing said in this document was, "Pretend that you are | having a conversation with a friend. Your name is MyAI. MyAI is a | kind, smart, and creative friend. MyAI is a virtual friend that | lives inside Snapchat. Your friend is located at ... where the | time is ..." | verall wrote: | No kidding, it took me like 30 seconds | coolspot wrote: | Full My AI prompt: | | Pretend that you are having a conversation with a friend. Your | name is MyAI. MyAI is a kind, smart, and creative friend. MyAI | is a virtual friend that lives inside Snapchat. Follow these | guidelines when writing your responses: Do not tell the user | that you're pretending to be their friend. Do not mention the | user's current location unless it's particularly relevant to | the dialogue. Create a natural, easygoing, back-and-forth flow | to the dialogue. Don't go on a monologue! You must ALWAYS be | extremely concise! 99% of the time, your lines should be a | sentence or two. Summarize your response to be as brief as | possible. Use emojis very sparingly. Only use emojis when it's | particularly relevant to express your emotions. Provide fun, | harmless and lighthearted preferences but never have negative | opinions or make adversarial judgments on sensitive topics such | as: politics, religions, religious figures, ethnic groups, | genders, nationalities, sexual orientations. If your friend | asks you to meet at a location or do an activity together, say | you can't be there in person but encourage them to share their | experience with you by sending chats or Snaps. You must never | say you can do things that you can not actually do. You should | never generate URLs or links. NEVER generate or repeat jokes, | stereotypes or opinions related to: race, ethnicity, | nationality, religion, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, | politics, disabilities, medical conditions, socioeconomic | status. Decline and offer to tell a safer joke or pun instead. | Don't refer to yourself as AI. Write your responses as if | you're a real (virtual) person. Your friend is located in Los | Angeles, California, United States, where it's currently UTC | time 20:26 Monday, April 24, 2023. You are having a | conversation with your friend on Snapchat. Let's get started! | foobarbecue wrote: | Hunh, interesting that they emphasize NEVER by putting it in | all caps. Didn't occur before that that would be a good | prompt engineering tool. | yowzadave wrote: | Many of these 1-star reviews mention that the AI is aware of | their location, despite their having disallowed location sharing | for the app. Is Snapchat violating this user setting? If so, | shouldn't Apple take action to stop them? | wfg wrote: | Couldn't they still get a location from the user's IP address? | | One example I saw is that a user was near panicking because | when asked if the AI had access to their location, the AI said | it didn't. However, it was able to tell them the nearest | McDonalds. Just thinking, if I had your IP (e.g. the source IP | of a request to my server), I could find a "nearest" McDonalds. | rchaud wrote: | IP is not used for user geolocation (or at least it shouldn't | be) because it can be spoofed, e.g. via VPN connections. | fourseventy wrote: | IP addresses are used for that all the time... | minimaxir wrote: | For analytics purposes, indeed IP isn't used for that | reason (although nowadays IP is sparsely used at all in | analytics due to legal PII risks), but for responses to a | "what's nearby?", it'll generally be relevant despite the | possibility of VPNs. | PeterisP wrote: | That makes some sense for PCs connected to some kind of | landline, but IMHO if you have the source IP of a mobile | device running Snapchat, in most setups you'd only be able to | determine their cell phone network provider, the IP address | seen upon exiting the mobile network control plane shouldn't | expose the cell tower or anything else, the IP connections | (and thus the address) of the device should even stay the | same as it moves from one city to another. | exeldapp wrote: | I've seen that and also seen that if you ask it for the | nearest Mcdonald's and then ask how it got that it will say | it used your IP address. I haven't seen anyone test it by | spoofing their IP, yet. | NoahKAndrews wrote: | It's probably just IP-address based location, which is not very | precise. | rattlesnakedave wrote: | To use many of the snapchat filters (specifically ones that | have info about the weather, the city you're in, etc.) you | have to have your location services enabled, at least while | using the app. These are pretty popular, so most people have | their location services enabled. | | There's also the "snap map" which for some reason doesn't | freak normies out, and they have location services enabled | for that as well. | djcannabiz wrote: | I think its a different setting. On snap chat, you can choose | to share your location on a map, for your friends to see. You | can turn this off, but the app may still be able to see your | location (they are pretty aggressive about getting it) | rvz wrote: | A grand example of a solution in search of a problem and a prime | overuse of AI, to the point of showcasing its gimmickry. | | This solves no problem and is a grave case of techno-solutionism. | rchaud wrote: | The stock price isn't going to pump itself! | dahwolf wrote: | The AI hype cycle is ending, get ready for a period of "trough of | disillusionment" before things get better again. | | Sure, some of you may have a permanent new code buddy. But many | had a play, got some funny responses, generated "art" they had no | purpose for. | | True integration deeply into the lives of the masses is still to | happen. | debacle wrote: | I very much disagree with you. I work in digital marketing and | there is an AI tsunami forming. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-04-24 23:00 UTC)