[HN Gopher] Digital Addiction: Focusing on the Cure, Not the Dis...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Digital Addiction: Focusing on the Cure, Not the Disease
        
       Author : louison11
       Score  : 20 points
       Date   : 2023-04-24 19:49 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (louison.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (louison.substack.com)
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Digital addiction is real. Some decades ago, when people didn't
       | have personal audio players and youtube it was normal for people
       | to sing in the street. Now just look what a pitiful society of
       | consumers we have become. We are giving up our identities for
       | more digital crack.
        
       | 908B64B197 wrote:
       | It's interesting that the only jurisdiction doing any thing about
       | this is China, and they mostly only target online games.
       | 
       | Games where young frustrated [0] [1] Chinese teenagers could talk
       | relatively freely with others from different regions of China. Or
       | god forbid, learn English and have contacts with westerners.
       | Better to keep them grinding on shaving a few tenth of a second
       | on basic algebra problems for the Gaokao. That will better
       | prepare them for the factories.
       | 
       | At the same time, of course, China pushes CCP-backed TikTok to
       | American Teens (gathering huge amount of intelligence and data in
       | the process).
       | 
       | [0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/world/too-
       | many-...
       | 
       | [1] https://www.newsweek.com/2015/06/05/gender-imbalance-
       | china-o...
        
       | superkuh wrote:
       | The only instances where "digital addiction" is treated serious
       | are authoritarian countries like China. In non-politically
       | motivated indices it does not exist. Because it does not exist.
       | No more than printed newspapers ruined people in the 1800s,
       | electricity in the 1900s, radio in the 1920s or TV in the 1950s.
       | This is basically just repurposing of future shock scares by
       | scammers running "treatment" programs in the west and governments
       | using it for social control elsewhere.
        
         | jack-bodine wrote:
         | I have to disagree with you. I know people who genuinely spend
         | 10+ hours a day on the net, completely wasting their time.
         | These aren't people who are browsing HN for short breaks while
         | working. These are the people who live in their parents
         | basements or dorm rooms playing league of legends, watching
         | twitch or browsing reddit while ignoring classes, education
         | and/or serious work.
         | 
         | Newspapers and radio didn't result in people spending 40+ hours
         | a week following the news. There probably are some people
         | addicted to TV, but it's such a minority that we don't consider
         | it an issue.
        
           | SomeDog76 wrote:
           | Just a personal anectode, but I definitly agree. I've very
           | likely had an average screentime of 8h on the phone per day
           | for the past the past 10 years of my life. With only few
           | timeframes inbetween where it has been less. Only this year
           | it has gotten somewhat better. And I don't think I am the
           | only perspn like that.
        
         | ksenzee wrote:
         | The term to look up here is "process addiction." You can be
         | addicted to a number of things that are perfectly healthy in
         | moderation, such as work, gambling, or shopping. Internet use
         | falls into the same category.
        
         | aaroninsf wrote:
         | Language of "addiction" or not,
         | 
         | your assertion is false. There are pragmatic and meaningful
         | differences between different media and communications
         | technologies, and these differences have been remarked upon and
         | considered for decades.
         | 
         | It is neither controversial nor remarkable nor indeed anything
         | but common knowledge that algorithmic social media > social
         | media > online media > televised media > radio > print for a
         | related constellation of properties--many of which related, by
         | design, to our relationship and attention to them.
         | 
         | Our attention and reward systems in specific have been the
         | explicit and focused target of billions of dollars of R&D and
         | product testing, with the result that the dopamine pellet
         | conditioning paradigm of contemporary social media and related
         | online properties, are literally unlike anything we have
         | encountered as a species before, and no exaggeration to say,
         | that we are utterly defenseless in the face of.
         | 
         | Understanding the mechanisms of attention and reward
         | manipulation, and of the consequent utility and increasing
         | application of such factors in service of using these systems
         | as mechanisms of social influence and behavioral conditioning,
         | is no defense. No more than understanding the mechanisms of the
         | appeal to us of fat, salt, and sugar, or for that matter
         | alcohol, nicotine, or opiates, is.
         | 
         | There is no defense other than opting out, tuning out, blocking
         | out. And that is not defense against being surveilled.
         | 
         | Should we call meticulously tuned conditioned behavior
         | addiction? Depends on the forum. Addiction medicine specialists
         | will no doubt have their own opinion.
         | 
         | For the rest of us, yes, it's obviously and undeniably
         | addiction, in the lay sense, and this entirely by design.
        
         | kelseyfrog wrote:
         | Just curious, do you happen to have a rubric for determining
         | whether an addiction is legitimate or not? If so, what is it?
        
         | Aaronstotle wrote:
         | The average American has somewhere around 4 hours a day of
         | phone screen time, that's a serious issue for society at large.
         | Tech companies have done exceptionally well at gamifying social
         | media, which results in more screen time because it gives our
         | brain dopamine.
         | 
         | Walk around without your phone, and you'll probably notice that
         | you find yourself checking your pocket to pull-out your phone,
         | at least I do.
        
         | com2kid wrote:
         | Every major mobile game company has psychologists on hand to
         | design mobile experiences that are more addictive than what
         | would be allowed in American casinos.
         | 
         | Machine learning and adaptive gameplay ensures that players are
         | always on the verge of the next dopamine hit, and when the time
         | is right, a pay to win screen is shoved in their face.
         | 
         | People spend hundreds of dollars on mobile experiences that
         | they _actively do not enjoy_ , it is behavioral manipulation of
         | the worst sort.
         | 
         | We need more regulation. For starters, gacha game mechanics
         | should be banned. After that, adaptive algorithms should be
         | looked into. It is really easy for a ML algorithm to find
         | someone who is depressed and start feeding them more and more
         | depressing content, ensuring engagement. Same goes for
         | extremism of any type, or really any extreme ends of the human
         | psychological spectrum, except, and this may be a sad statement
         | on the nature of humanity, of positive emotions, the activation
         | which do not create long term engagement.
        
           | nix0n wrote:
           | > mobile experiences that are more addictive than what would
           | be allowed in American casinos
           | 
           | Does the Nevada Gaming Commission have a specific standard
           | here, which could be copied by other government bodies?
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | I'm sure that experts can diagnose addiction, e.g. by looking
         | at changes in the brain using brain scans etc.
        
         | Retric wrote:
         | People do get successful treatment for this in the US.
         | 
         | Like most additions it's a question of actual harm not the
         | public's acceptance. Thus millions of regular drinkers aren't
         | all alcoholics but there are also plenty of alcoholics. When
         | someone with a reasonable income is losing their house after
         | maxing their credit cards because they can't stop buying loot
         | boxes, it's a really obvious problem.
        
         | leafstrat wrote:
         | Your comment is so naive in underestimating these incredibly
         | powerful devices.
         | 
         | You can't even begin to imagine what it's like because you're
         | some old guy but these kids who don't know any difference have
         | absolutely devastated their reward mechanisms. A newspaper is
         | easy to skim in a half hour, you might be bored enough to re-
         | read all the articles if you had nothing else to do. These
         | devices however are constantly spewing out limitless novel
         | information which creates FOMO dependency. Youth have had an
         | infinite supply of 4K resolution stimulation in front of their
         | faces ever since they could communicate. Persuaded by the
         | biggest communications platforms to ever exist, and their
         | algorithms to manipulate emotions and desires.
         | 
         | These youth have been primed to be constantly engaged consumers
         | by decades of advertising, technology, psychological studying
         | and implementation. You are seen as "weird" if you don't have a
         | social media that is posted on frequently. People cannot focus
         | on reading a book anymore. People prefer to document an
         | experience rather than "living in it".
         | 
         | > Mar 15, 2023 -- According to data from DataReportal, the
         | average American spends 6 hours and 59 minutes looking at a
         | screen every day.
        
       | blueyes wrote:
       | Digital addictions are similar to pathologies of food, and unlike
       | other things we usually think of as addictive, like hard drugs.
       | That is because, as with food, most of us cannot escape the
       | digital. Everyday, we are exposed to the thing that also incites
       | pathological behavior. It's impossible to go cold turkey. People
       | with food pathologies resort to things like time-bounding
       | exercises (if it's noon, I can eat). Like processed food, digital
       | experiences are backed by an industry whose profits are pegged to
       | how much of us they consume. People with digital addiction are
       | suffering from a kind of informational metabolic syndrome.
       | 
       | The cure is harder than the author thinks. "Making our lives so
       | warm that the digital is dull in comparison" sounds great, but
       | our phones channel all the vices, titillations, and novelties of
       | the world. It's actually hard to make that dull.
       | 
       | I'm not sure there is a cure, but a good approach would be a
       | digital purge -- take a month off if you possibly can. That will
       | serve as a dopamine reset, and make many things IRL _seem_ more
       | interesting.
       | 
       | Buy a device that limits what you can do, like a lightphone.
       | 
       | https://www.thelightphone.com
       | 
       | Barring a light phone, various parental controls...
       | 
       | Because if you let the digital channel duke it out with the
       | analog without rigging the game, the digital will keep sucking
       | you back in.
        
       | mnkv wrote:
       | > The solvents we need in this case are the healthier methods of
       | fulfilling these longings.
       | 
       | Terrible take. Algorithmic feeds and ad-tech has continually
       | optimized how to get and maintain our attention. It is ridiculous
       | to think "going into nature" or any individual solution is the
       | answer. We blame pharmaceutical companies for making addictive
       | drugs, why don't we blame tech companies for making addictive
       | apps?
        
         | haswell wrote:
         | As someone who has started replacing online habits with outside
         | habits with some pretty life changing results, I can't agree
         | with you.
         | 
         | This isn't to say that social media companies should be
         | excused, and I suspect only regulation will force them to
         | change.
         | 
         | But it's also up to individuals to take an active role in
         | stopping and finding healthier outlets. For me, that had meant
         | deleting apps, mostly getting off of Reddit, and intentionally
         | building new habits that are not oriented around social media.
         | Getting out in nature is more important than I think most
         | realize.
         | 
         | One need only look at the continued existence of
         | smokers/smoking to highlight that short of an outright ban
         | (which would cause other issues), the person is really at the
         | center of quitting. Even if these companies started getting all
         | of the appropriate blame today, that's not going to change that
         | people have possibly difficult changes to make. There is no
         | magic or shortcut that undoes the habit patterns without the
         | individual choosing to make changes and following through on
         | implementing them.
        
       | hayst4ck wrote:
       | I am extremely militantly atheist, but I remember growing up with
       | the church and experiencing community. There were weekly potlucks
       | and all the church kids would hang out frequently while the
       | parents drank. There were various clubs like choir you could just
       | show up and be accepted.
       | 
       | Today we see things like christian parents abandoning their gay
       | children, wanting to "cure" trans people, or "christians" voting
       | for trump and it's clear that religion and therefore, for many,
       | community has been corrupted by politics. From the outside
       | religion seems more about hate than love. An irony considering
       | the teachings of Jesus.
       | 
       | The internet exposes people to other people all around the earth
       | who grew up in different environments, it makes clear that
       | religion is a tradition, not a truth to be measured and
       | understood, it is clear that region is in decline.
       | 
       | The tragedy is that what was once a centerpiece of community has
       | dwindled, and I think we are seeing the effects across society.
       | Lack of community promotes addiction.
       | 
       | We used to be born into community and baptized into it, but now
       | we are left seeking it ourselves without guides like pastors.
       | Community has been replaced with therapy. What we were once born
       | into is now something we have to work for and pay for, and I
       | don't think that as a society we have figured out what the next
       | evolution of community looks like.
        
         | throwaway22032 wrote:
         | Are you just misremembering the treatment of gay/trans people
         | growing up?
         | 
         | In my neck of the woods, being gay was not acceptable, we would
         | constantly use homophobic slurs, and being trans (not a cross
         | dresser, but actually changing gender/sex) was treated fairly
         | similarly to insanity.
         | 
         | Nowadays, IME most people think that being gay is acceptable
         | and unless they live fairly rurally or something probably have
         | gay friends, and mostly people recognise the validity of being
         | transgender but still find it a bit of an "out there" lifestyle
         | choice.
         | 
         | I don't buy the idea that the Christian community were more
         | supportive of these things before and things have regressed. I
         | think you just care about them more now for whatever reason.
        
         | dragonwriter wrote:
         | > I remember growing up with the church and experiencing
         | community.
         | 
         | While everyone lokes to generalize their church experience as
         | "the church", the fact is that the experience of the church,
         | even at a given point in time, varies a lot by particular
         | church community (parish/congregation/etc.), even within thr
         | same larger organization.
         | 
         | > Today we see things like christian parents abandoning their
         | gay children, wanting to "cure" trans people, or "christians"
         | voting for trump and it's clear that religion and therefore,
         | for many, community has been corrupted by politics
         | 
         | None of this is new. I grew up in great, accepting Church
         | communities in the 1970s and 1980s, but even as a kid I knew
         | those weren't the only kind.
         | 
         | And even then, religious organizations being deeply involved in
         | and affecte by basic political disputes (on every side) wasn't
         | new. We (and the institutions themselves) tend to celebrate it
         | for institutions that were on what is, in retrospect, seen as
         | the right side, but a view of history that only pays attention
         | to the history people like to talk about is misleading.
        
         | prottog wrote:
         | > From the outside religion seems more about hate than love.
         | 
         | I'd wager the view is different from the inside. Communities of
         | any kind can be condemned one way or another from the outside.
         | The weekly potlucks and choirs still exist and I'll bet you way
         | fewer Christian parents (of whatever denomination) see a gay
         | child as a sin than whenever it was that you grew up.
         | 
         | > I don't think that as a society we have figured out what the
         | next evolution of community looks like.
         | 
         | Honestly, it might look like a society in which people go back
         | to church.
        
           | empyrrhicist wrote:
           | > way fewer Christian parents (of whatever denomination) see
           | a gay child as a sin than whenever it was that you grew up.
           | 
           | Maybe, but I'd need to see numbers - and certainly the
           | hateful are very vocal. Anecdotally I've watched the moderate
           | Lutheran church of my parents undergo the same schism between
           | progressives and regressives we see everywhere else over the
           | last 20 years.
           | 
           | > Honestly, it might look like a society in which people go
           | back to church.
           | 
           | Perhaps, but that's simply not an option for many. After
           | losing my religion and continuing to learn about the universe
           | as seen scientifically, the idea of joining an organization
           | with a supernatural doctrine is just impossible to imagine.
           | The idea of people pretending to know such wildly specific
           | things about the nature of reality without evidence is
           | viscerally offensive to my sensibilities.
        
             | svachalek wrote:
             | Yes. I haven't been to church much lately but in more
             | conservative denominations (Catholic, Lutheran) I've seen
             | direct politics in the pulpit, go vote for this or that
             | Republican or support "our" party. Having grown up with
             | "separation of church and state" seeming to be something
             | everyone could agree on, it gives me chills.
        
         | perfmode wrote:
         | why militantly?
        
           | empyrrhicist wrote:
           | Not OP, but I probably fall at least somewhat into that
           | category. Most people that feel strongly about their non-
           | theism seem to do so in response to their direct or indirect
           | experience with the religious. I grew up in a very Christian
           | environment, and painfully coming to the realization that my
           | methods for dealing with existential anxiety were based on
           | lies made me extremely bitter.
           | 
           | Even now, after many years of becoming better adjusted and
           | working on myself I'm still a bit salty about it, and I don't
           | think it can be good for children to experience. I also get
           | grossed out, for lack of a better term, at all the self
           | congratulatory nonsense that goes on in religious
           | communities. I have no problem with religious people, and
           | have a number of lovely ones in my life, but if people start
           | even lightly evangelizing at me my hackles go up quick.
        
           | klyrs wrote:
           | Speaking as one who used to identify in that way: I was
           | raised adjacent to militant Christians -- they were in my
           | family, in my neighborhood, in the non-religious third-place
           | communities I belonged to. I felt the need to fight in the
           | war that they brought to my doorstep.
        
         | giantrobot wrote:
         | > The tragedy is that what was once a centerpiece of community
         | has dwindled, and I think we are seeing the effects across
         | society. Lack of community promotes addiction.
         | 
         | The Skinner boxes that are engineered into social media is a
         | huge part of addiction. Social media is filled with digital
         | versions of the psychological traps found in casinos. Social
         | media weaponized dopamine.
        
         | thaumaturgy wrote:
         | Maybe you grew up long before I did, but my childhood began in
         | the late 70s, and I remember Proposition 8 (2008), Matthew
         | Shepard (1998), satanic panic (1980s and 90s), and I know
         | people my age and younger that survived conversion therapy
         | "camps".
         | 
         | I don't really disagree with the rest of your points, and I can
         | be convinced that churches have gotten incrementally more
         | political since 2008, but I don't think the differences are
         | quite as stark as you say. Churches have been political and
         | cruel to out-groups for a long time.
         | 
         | I suspect that some of the perceived difference can be ascribed
         | to experiencing church as a child vs. experiencing it as an
         | adult.
        
         | treeman79 wrote:
         | Left wing is all about killing unborn babies. Eradicating any
         | authority, other than what comes from the government. So God /
         | religion has to go. Recently openly grooming and mutilating
         | children.
         | 
         | Of course Christians are going to move away from far left
         | positions.
         | 
         | Study rise of Communist in China, Russia, It does not end well
         | for anyone of faith.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-24 23:01 UTC)