[HN Gopher] The Madness in our Methods: Crash of GW9525 and our ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Madness in our Methods: Crash of GW9525 and our broken
       aeromedical system
        
       Author : oxfeed65261
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2023-04-29 18:24 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (admiralcloudberg.medium.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (admiralcloudberg.medium.com)
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | Some of the most commonly prescribed antidepression medications
       | can in certain populations actually increase the risk of suicide.
       | 
       | In addition, if you look at the mass killings that have made the
       | news, it seems that most of not all of them were on some type of
       | antidepressant.
       | 
       | There may be a link that is worth exploring further, but there
       | are some very strong interests that would be opposed.
        
       | leetrout wrote:
       | I briefly held a student pilots license, issued my exemption, due
       | to kidney stones. I have suffered from depression for years and
       | was extremely reluctant to seek treatment because I knew it would
       | be detrimental to flying.
       | 
       | My primary care doctor had me try lexapro in 2018 and even though
       | I hadn't flown in 2 years I protested but reluctantly agreed I
       | needed to do something and it was unlikely I would ever fly as a
       | private pilot for many factors and should go on with treatment.
       | 
       | I know for a fact pilots hide all kinds of medical issues. I had
       | a doctor that worked with delta pilots and argued my case with
       | the FAA (a formality more than anything) and he along with
       | everyone at flight school advocated for keeping my kidney stones
       | to myself and not disclosing it in the first place.
       | 
       | The system needs some work. I have first hand experience with it
       | without my livelihood being on the line and its easy to imagine
       | why pilots hide issues.
        
         | ericpauley wrote:
         | The situation has improved dramatically in the part 91 world.
         | If you received a 3rd class (including special issuance) within
         | the past 10 years you can likely now do BasicMed as long as
         | your condition is well managed. Might be worth looking into
         | before the 10 year limit expires.
        
           | adhd1110101 wrote:
           | See part 3 which specifically names the 4 drugs that are
           | permitted with a special issuance. https://www.faa.gov/ame_gu
           | ide/app_process/exam_tech/item47/a...
        
             | ericpauley wrote:
             | If they already have a non-revoked 3rd class from before,
             | though, having used one not on this list may not prevent
             | getting BasicMed. Even if you're technically eligible for
             | an SI you should just do BasicMed and not risk it if you
             | don't have to. Disclaimer: not an AME, YMMV.
        
       | wly_cdgr wrote:
       | Sounds like an ethics problem more than a regulatory system
       | problem. The long term solution is not reducing the incentive to
       | lie, it's better and more extensive moral education to increase
       | personal reluctance to lie. Why is that the better solution?
       | Because it has profound benefits that extend far beyond this
       | specific scenario / industry.
        
         | ledauphin wrote:
         | Ethics is not reducible to "learning not to lie." There's also
         | "not using sweeping generalizations to dramatically affect
         | individual's lives" and "using authority the way it was
         | intended instead of shrinking from the responsibility granted
         | by the will of the people" and a whole other host of ethical
         | issues that apply to the various aeronautical administrations.
         | 
         | Brainwashing alone does not an ethical system make. You
         | generally have to act ethically in order to teach other people
         | to do the same.
        
       | Qem wrote:
       | Great report! But I missed some discussion on the role workplace
       | bullying may have contributed to mental deterioration of the
       | pilot. At time of the crash, I remember reading some reports he
       | was mocked by colleagues due to working as a flight attendant
       | before becoming a pilot. IIRC they even nicknamed him "Tomato
       | Andy", after the red uniform of flight attendants used by the
       | company.
        
       | oxfeed65261 wrote:
       | Admiral Cloudberg (Kyra Dempsey) writes detailed, thoughtful
       | analyses of airline disasters. In many cases, subsequent
       | improvements have made a disaster type unlikely to recur. This
       | one (the suicide/mass murder of Andreas Lubitz on Germanwings
       | flight 9525) is an exception, and the article makes a strong case
       | that significant changes are needed but are not being pursued.
       | The archive is full of fascinating, riveting accounts of what
       | happened, why, and how for many different tragedies.
        
         | owenmarshall wrote:
         | I do enjoy Admiral Cloudberg's work!
         | 
         | > In the aftermath of the crash, experts proposed various
         | measures intended to reduce the risk of pilot suicide,
         | including a rule that there must be two crewmembers in the
         | cockpit at all times. ...] Shortly after the crash of flight
         | 9525, the European Aviation Safety Agency began encouraging the
         | policy in Europe in order to gather data about its
         | effectiveness, but after the trial period was over, the results
         | were not encouraging. [...] the policy leaves the cockpit door
         | open for longer periods of time, increasing the risk of
         | hijackings, which historically have been much more common than
         | pilot suicides anyway.
         | 
         | This seems to be the crux of the matter.
         | 
         | I've seen it argued that the _only_ sensible post-9 /11
         | security measure was reinforcing the cockpit door. Extra
         | screenings, shoes off, no liquids - all this seems secondary at
         | best, security theatre at worst, when compared to denying an
         | adversary control of an airplane.
         | 
         | Having said that, I've also heard the theory advanced that even
         | a reinforced door isn't needed: passengers mental models have
         | shifted from compliance to active resistance, and 9/11 may be
         | impossible to repeat as a result.
        
           | di4na wrote:
           | If this is the crux of the matter you took away from this,
           | you probably missed the point by a lot...
           | 
           | Can i recommend a rereading of the last 3 part, the one about
           | medical conditions killing pilots careers and how it
           | incentivise them to hide a lot of conditions?
        
             | owenmarshall wrote:
             | Pilot suicides leading to death of flyers is incredibly
             | rare, as even the article indicates. But I'm not qualified
             | to say what impact an intervention - even one that appears
             | outwardly positive - could have.
        
       | dhsysusbsjsi wrote:
       | Great article, but unfortunately the lying is entrenched
       | culturally. The regulator is so distrusted it can never change.
       | 
       | For example in Australia I've heard multiple cases of somebody
       | proactively seeking counselling for help dealing with temporarily
       | stressful situations such as divorce, then being grounded at
       | work, and the regulator (CASA) denying medical clearances. This
       | increases the stress.
       | 
       | Every time some senior person proclaims "it's okay this time -
       | report your illnesses", it never is, and we go around this circle
       | again and again. I will personally _never_ report my medical
       | history accurately to the regulator.
        
         | di4na wrote:
         | It can change. The regulator could start doing positive
         | examples of temporary grounding and supporting the pilot. There
         | are all kind of active actions the regulator could take that
         | would change things over a few decades.
         | 
         | But first the regulator need to take action and keep doing it.
        
         | imoverclocked wrote:
         | This sounds like learned helplessness. Of course there is
         | something they can do. There are a lot of things they can do to
         | become better.
         | 
         | The medical profession is almost unrecognizable from what it
         | was in the 1950s. My grandfather (MD) said as much 15 years ago
         | before passing away. It has only changed more since then. The
         | FAA's policies are based on 1950s medical knowledge and
         | opinions.
         | 
         | If you spend any significant time in online aviation circles,
         | medical issues come up _daily._ People who had a diagnosis of
         | ADHD as a kid (when getting diagnosed with it was all the rage)
         | have to jump through insane hoops if they disclose that on
         | their FAA medical. Meanwhile, existing pilots often avoid going
         | to a doctor or seeking help when they need it because of the
         | possibility of losing their source of income, temporarily or
         | maybe even permanently.
         | 
         | So, in many situations, instead of having healthy pilots, we
         | have unhealthy pilots. The policy sometimes has the complete
         | opposite effect of its intended purpose.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-04-29 23:00 UTC)