[HN Gopher] Eye Candy ___________________________________________________________________ Eye Candy Author : bookofjoe Score : 328 points Date : 2023-05-02 17:54 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (eycndy.com) (TXT) w3m dump (eycndy.com) | rexreed wrote: | I can't wait for the day I can make photo-realistic full length | movies with spoken dialogue and different camera effects entirely | using an AI-generation / AI-enhanced tool. I have a feeling those | days are coming soon. | alefnula wrote: | Already possible :'D | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs | chefandy wrote: | I don't mean to be flippant, and I wish you the best of luck in | your creative endeavors, but I think the emergence of this sort | of functionality will solidify the role of professional artists | in our society. If you compare the work of art school freshmen | with art school seniors, it's pretty apparent that using tools | to physically create media is a pretty small part of what they | learn. | chefandy wrote: | And they've been drilled by experienced creative | professionals full-time for four years. Many of the creative | controls these generators abstract away are the most | consequential, and they will never be more than an amalgam of | what they've already seen. Smooth? Sure. Polished? Yes. | Visually striking? Absolutely. Will every detail be | considered, reconsidered, pored over, lightly massaged and | then reconsidered by a team of people who've dedicated their | professional lives to using images to elicit precisely | crafted emotional responses in people? No. | | That said, SyFy Originals and Hallmark Channel movies will | probably operate much differently than they do now. | kleer001 wrote: | Probably only two more papers down the line... maybe a year, | maybe two. But like anything new it'll be expensive at first. | | My prediction is that within 20 years we'll be making full | length high quality movies, automatically. Everyone will be a | production house, in a of themselves. You'll subscribe to | people's individual streams of movies like we subscribe to | netflix. | arlongparker wrote: | This seems like a terrible future | version_five wrote: | 2027, Netflix has regressed to an Amazon-like platform where | each movie search yields a long list of movies "fulfilled by | netflix" made by lkmmfffrrx movie store, with 100% positive | feedback. | function_seven wrote: | LKMMFFFRRX Movie Studios presents FOLGRISTCHI | | [(Long running times. Over 90 minutes)] | | [(Many audio tracks. Choose cinematic or directors | talking)] | | [(Best movie for 2027)] | | [(Vibrant colors make it lifelike)] | ianbutler wrote: | Why? | arlongparker wrote: | Movies to me are an art of thoughtful composure. A | deliberate creation. Nothing seems more soulless and boring | to me then some generated sludge born out of an AIs | unconscious peephole view of the human experience. | rexreed wrote: | What if I want a tool that will help me with my own | creativity? I never said I wanted randomly generated AI | art. I just want a tool that will help me create when I'm | not a cinematographer, actor, editor, or any of those | things. Why can't I have the augmented intelligence | assistance I'm looking for? Not sure I understand this | perspective on technology and tools. | arlongparker wrote: | I'm all for tools. I must of misinterpreted your post | rexreed wrote: | In which I can make my own movies? I don't have the technical | capability but I have the interest, why would it be terrible | for me to have tools at my disposal that can take my creative | interests and make them a reality? I'm not suggesting _all_ | films be made like this. I just want tools that I can use, | myself to make something that I would enjoy and perhaps | others might enjoy as well. | excitom wrote: | There's potential, sure, but it won't make everyone into a | filmmaker just like Microsoft Word didn't make everyone | into an author and Photoshop didn't make everyone an | artist. | sitkack wrote: | You are arguing against a point no one made. | arlongparker wrote: | I'm all for tools to empower deliberate creation. An end to | end AI generated movie, while intriguing to see what it | might think up, falls flat to me. What is the point of | watching it other than fascination. There is no conscious | decision, direction. Merely a recycled reflection of past | input. | rcoveson wrote: | It's fascinating to me how ~80% of the population of the | atheist-dominated parts of the Internet seem to have | found religion as soon as they started thinking about the | implications of AI passing the Turing test in varying | degrees in the present and near future. | [deleted] | DrewADesign wrote: | I'd never really considered it before, but people replacing a | large portion of their media consumption with self-made media | could buttress, if not accelerate the echo chamber effect. | EGreg wrote: | What is this exactly? | | Doesn't explain anything on the site. | gambiting wrote: | Same here, no idea what this is. | jccalhoun wrote: | click on the terms to see definition and examples of various | film techniques | mankyd wrote: | A catalog of various (usually) camera-created visual affects. | It gives names to all the weird angles, pans, and tilts that | you might see in film. | | A lot of them are pretty extreme and would overwhelm if over- | used, but are eye catching in short amounts, such as ads, music | videos, or short bits in longer format film. | ranger207 wrote: | Reminds me of https://www.sakugabooru.com/, a booru that is (as I | understand it) designed as a reference for anime animators | jibbers wrote: | Is it just me or does this page sync up nicely with any music? | reiichiroh wrote: | I thought this was going to be about KPT or Kai's Eye Candy. | [deleted] | suddenclarity wrote: | Really like it but it feels very sluggish which I assume is due | to the size of the content. Clicking on FPV Drone seems to result | in 192 mb being fetched. Despite this, clicking on a thumbnail | still takes time to fetch the full size. I don't know if a more | optimised format would be enough or a TikTok layout would be | better suited but it does impact the experience negatively. Love | the project though. | spyder wrote: | Yea, using gifs for videos is probably not the best idea in | 2023. The page source is also interesting with 147 CSS classes | defined on the <body> tag... XD | symlinkk wrote: | ADHD simulator | wayeq wrote: | A pen test for seizure disorders | intrasight wrote: | I thought it was nothing but photos because there was no motion | while scrolling. Had scrolled through several pages before I | stopped long enough for any motion to be apparent. Not sure if | that can be fixed/optimized. | jb1991 wrote: | Instant motion for me on 5-yr old iPhone. | WXLCKNO wrote: | Instant motion for me on Galaxy S23 Ultra. | | Irrelevant data point ? | gambiting wrote: | No motion for me on my S23 Ultra. Might have something to | do with my current 5mbps internet connection though :-P | aydio wrote: | Very cool, reminds me of patakk[1]. | | [1]: https://patakk.tumblr.com/ | stronglikedan wrote: | Slightly NSFW | seabass-labrax wrote: | Some of these could make rather nice freedesktop.org Plymouth | themes. | __MatrixMan__ wrote: | Most of them have descriptions (which I've enjoyed because I | previously lumped all "weird camera tricks" together). But | https://eycndy.com/frame-division seems to just show the home | page over again. | TheJoeMan wrote: | Ha! Is it purposely recursive? The home page is laid out in a | frame division. I think it's a joke. | __MatrixMan__ wrote: | :facepalm: of course. Thanks. | chinaman425 wrote: | [dead] | tdaltonc wrote: | everything is "pan". | https://twitter.com/tvaziri/status/1501217030112006150/photo... | Gordonjcp wrote: | Urgh. Thanks, I hate it. | cbreynoldson wrote: | Love the mission. Keep it up (literally)! | eycndy wrote: | Hello! My name is Jacobi. I made Eyecandy. I'm appreciating | seeing suggestions. Is there anything you want me to try on the | website? Anything I could improve? | kman82 wrote: | Yea. Maybe tell me what this site is about? | sizzle wrote: | Love this site, how long did it take to build? | | Would be cool to see clips of being the scenes showing camera | placement and set/crew | paddw wrote: | People might also enjoy https://archillect.com/ | gowld wrote: | Very hard to appreciate the demos when they all play at the same | time. | rymawby wrote: | You can click each one and it gives you a more in depth | explanation of the technique used. I didn't realise this for | the first couple of minutes. | ladberg wrote: | A few of the datamoshing examples (Sleazyworld Go, Duda Beat) are | just normal vfx and not actually datamoshing. | | Datamoshing is just reusing the motion tracking done by video | codecs intended to provide compression in unintended ways. | progmetaldev wrote: | I'm not sure if actual datamoshing was used, but I always | enjoyed the effect in Mastodon's (the band) Oblivion music | video. | | https://youtu.be/s6WGNd8QR-U?t=41 | | https://youtu.be/s6WGNd8QR-U?t=93 | | https://youtu.be/s6WGNd8QR-U?t=102 | joemi wrote: | Datamoshing is one effect that I don't think I'll ever process | as an effect instead of an error (and as a result, I don't like | it). My brain simply won't process it as "effect". I think it's | from my history of downloading videos that had errors which | produced the effect. Especially back in the slower less- | reliable internet days, it was always soooo annoying to have | spent hours downloading something only to have a glitch that | caused the datamoshing effect. Plus, now all video I ever watch | is digital, so I'm never totally sure that there wasn't a | streaming issue or if it was intentional, unless it's being | used heavily as an effect over and over and I see it enough in | the same video to realize it's intentional. | joezydeco wrote: | At least the comment is correct: _" It's used to add a touch | of psychedelic flair to your shots or to hide the fact that | you accidentally deleted half of your footage."_ | izolate wrote: | Very cool. I found the author's candid FAQ page worth a read. | Their head seems to be in the right place. | otterpro wrote: | Wow, this is great for getting a glimpse of various video | techniques in cinematography... just found out I could click it | to see bigger video. This also reminds me of | https://shotdeck.com, which is a paid service. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-05-02 23:00 UTC)