[HN Gopher] Dutch town installs bat-friendly red LED street ligh...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Dutch town installs bat-friendly red LED street lights (2018)
        
       Author : maxwell
       Score  : 103 points
       Date   : 2023-05-08 19:18 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (electronics360.globalspec.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (electronics360.globalspec.com)
        
       | 1letterunixname wrote:
       | Seems like something Austin would do, but anti-grackle* lighting
       | would be a better use of funds.
       | 
       | *Grackles are small corvids that are fearless, loud, and
       | annoying.
        
         | TylerE wrote:
         | " Despite a currently robust population, a recent study by the
         | National Audubon Society of data from the Christmas Bird Count
         | indicated that populations had declined by 61% to a population
         | of 73 million from historic highs of over 190 million
         | birds.[12] As a result, it is now classified by the IUCN as
         | Near Threatened."
        
       | dudeinjapan wrote:
       | Kavinsky should move there.
        
       | AngryData wrote:
       | I don't understand why red light is not the default for night
       | lighting and street lamps and maybe even car headlights. Red
       | light allows you to see while still maintaining your night
       | vision. Blue or white or whatever other color you use will ruin
       | your night vision and only allows you to see what is decently
       | illuminated and anything outside that zone becomes invisible.
        
         | cronix wrote:
         | The US Navy agrees with you, and is one of the reasons why
         | interior lighting in ships/subs is red during battle so you can
         | quickly switch between daylight and red without eye adjustment.
         | Plus it looks cool.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi1R2UK3OTA
        
           | spurgu wrote:
           | Yeah I have red LED lighting in my boats for night lighting
           | and also use the red light almost exclusively on my headlamp
           | at night when camping, to maintain my night vision.
        
         | munificent wrote:
         | _> will ruin your night vision_
         | 
         | But it takes about 45 minutes for your eyes to fully adapt to
         | darkness.
         | 
         | So if we were to use red lighting at a level of illumination
         | that assumes fully adapted eyes, it means people won't have
         | sufficient brightneses for the first 45 minutes of their drive,
         | which is likely most of it.
        
         | GloriousKoji wrote:
         | Stop signs will be the same color as everything else.
        
           | Hamuko wrote:
           | Stop signs have a unique shape to them, as well as a big STOP
           | text written on them.
        
             | excalibur wrote:
             | The white-on-red text is going to be very low contrast
             | under a red light. The shape is still supposed to be
             | unique.
        
         | argondonor wrote:
         | The blue tint disrupts your sleep cycle and helps keep you
         | awake when driving at night. There's definitely a trade off to
         | be had depending on where these lights are located though.
        
           | TylerE wrote:
           | Red is also really low contrast, at least at non-night-vision
           | destroying lumen levels.
        
           | Galaxeblaffer wrote:
           | says what evidence? it's pretty much been debunked for a long
           | time, and the whole premise is apparently based on bad
           | science. I'm pretty sure i read an article here on hn that
           | showed that this whole blue light scare was based on old
           | science with extremely limited sample sizes and extreme
           | exposure. i tried to link to an article from 2016 that still
           | says that it affects sleep because i hastily read the first
           | part. trying to dig up the article i read seems to be hard,
           | but at least I'm still pretty sure that the science is not
           | settled on the matter at all.
           | 
           | earlier posted article
           | https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-04-debunking-digital-
           | eye...
        
             | mainframed wrote:
             | Do you always link to articles supporting your opponents
             | view? (Hint: read the last section of the article)
        
               | joshvm wrote:
               | If you're referring to melatonin then the science really
               | isn't that clear. Most light suppresses melatonin
               | production.
               | 
               | One of the biggest arguments against blue light
               | (specifically) being disruptive is that the sky spectrum
               | in the evening is also blue (so naturally you'd be
               | exposed to it). Modern airliners use blue lights for
               | overnight flights with red lights at "dawn". I suspect
               | screen brightness is more of an issue than any particular
               | colour.
        
               | mlyle wrote:
               | The dynamic range of the eye is confusing for aspects
               | like this.
               | 
               | The amount of blue light you're exposed to from the night
               | sky is trivial. Outdoors on a moonless night is 0.002 lux
               | (of which, my understanding, about half is airglow and
               | fairly blueish).
               | 
               | Compare to a not-too-bright single blue LED in your
               | bedroom, emitting 0.5 lumens. You could spread that over
               | 2000 square feet of surfaces and still have more blue
               | light around than comes from the night sky.
        
               | TylerE wrote:
               | Lux != lumen. Lux is lumen _per unit area_.
        
               | BenjiWiebe wrote:
               | Isn't that what they are saying? 0.5 lumen spread out
               | over 2000 sq feet is still more lux than the night sky?
        
               | mlyle wrote:
               | Yes... that is why I divided by area. Read again.
        
               | moremetadata wrote:
               | [dead]
        
               | mainframed wrote:
               | I'm not referring to anything. I just found it hilarious
               | that the guy, to whom I replied, linked an article which
               | contradicted himself.
               | 
               | I have no stance on this. I don't even care. I can sleep
               | well at night.
        
               | Galaxeblaffer wrote:
               | touche..
        
           | TheRealPomax wrote:
           | It's not really the "blue" part. It's the "forcing yourself
           | to be awake when you shouldn't be" part that disrupts your
           | sleep cycle. Driving at night when you should be in bed is so
           | much more the problem than whatever color the light is. For
           | you as human at least =)
        
             | ketzo wrote:
             | That's the point -- the blue is to help break the cycle
             | further and keep you awake, when your body insists
             | otherwise!
        
         | KennyBlanken wrote:
         | Our eyes are the least sensitive to it so it requires more
         | light (which means more overall brightness, which actually
         | makes your night vision worse and limits visibility of
         | everything not lit, because your iris closes more) and it
         | provides poor visibility/contrast and no color vision.
         | 
         | The only advantage red light offers is not disrupting your
         | circadian rhythm.
         | 
         | Airplane instrument panels are lit with white. Saab, Volvo, and
         | plenty of others use white or nearly white light for their
         | dashboards.
         | 
         | Blue is used in theater only because it is less noticeable to
         | the audience when it spills or reflects somewhere it shouldn't.
         | 
         | The real question is: especially with even 10 year old car
         | headlights being so much better than the utter trash car
         | headlights were 30 or more years ago, why are we still wasting
         | so much energy, and impacting wildlife, and hurting millions of
         | people's circadian rhythms, blasting streets with light all
         | night?
         | 
         | There isn't even any argument in terms of public safety;
         | there's never been any proof that lighting reduces crime. Lack
         | of lighting forces people up to no good doing things where they
         | shouldn't be, to use lights themselves - which stands out much,
         | much more than someone doing something they shouldn't be under
         | outdoor floodlights.
        
           | derefr wrote:
           | > why are we still wasting so much energy, and impacting
           | wildlife, and hurting millions of people's circadian rhythms,
           | blasting streets with light all night?
           | 
           | For pedestrians?
           | 
           | (I agree with your reasoning as it applies to highways, but
           | most of the world's light pollution from overhead street
           | lighting comes from lighting done either 1. within dense
           | cities, or 2. within industrial complexes -- in both cases to
           | aid people walking around outside at night.)
        
             | mgaunard wrote:
             | I actually find that my visibility on highways is worse for
             | the parts that are illuminated by streetlights than for the
             | parts that are only illuminated by my car.
             | 
             | I've found for example that it's extremely dangerous to go
             | beyond 180kmh (110 mph) at night whenever there are street
             | lights, while it's sort of ok if you just have side mirrors
             | on the highway reflecting your own lights (not that I
             | recommend to anyone to drive at such high speeds,
             | especially in low visibility conditions).
        
             | smolder wrote:
             | Bright night time lighting is often installed here as
             | "security lighting". Meaning the bright light is primarily
             | there to make people uncomfortable and not commit crimes.
             | The pink-orange glow of sodium bulbs was so nice and
             | inviting compared to all these daylight blue parking lot
             | projectors. I wish I lived somewhere where outdoor lighting
             | needed a permit and the issuing authority rejected
             | everything above X lumens or Y color temperature.
        
             | elric wrote:
             | As a pedestrian, I'd be much happier with a LOT LESS light
             | at night. Though I have to admit that the overhead street
             | lights aren't my biggest concerns (except for the newer
             | awful white/blue LEDs). Car headlights are what really piss
             | me off. Heck, even tail lights can blind me at night.
        
         | AlecSchueler wrote:
         | The Netherlands has many streets that are designed as "low car"
         | streets or "bike first" streets.
         | 
         | The white lights are important for road safety but the Dutch
         | have developed methods of softly discouraging the kind of
         | traffic that makes the road dangerous.
         | 
         | This is especially common in residential areas. Most town
         | centres are pedestrianized but retain brighter lighting as they
         | can still be quite busy public areas in the evening.
        
         | rocqua wrote:
         | Technology connections (youtube channel) did a video about
         | this. There was a trade-off between night vision and circadian
         | rythm disruption vs driver safety.
         | 
         | Cooler light is better at keeping people awake and alert, and
         | people drive safer when they are alert. Given that car
         | accidents are a major cause od death, that is a hard point to
         | compromise on.
        
       | qbasic_forever wrote:
       | Yikes isn't this a nightmare for some colorblind people as the
       | red light will not be clearly visible or provide much contrast
       | for what they see?
        
         | cultureswitch wrote:
         | Good thinking, but this isn't how colorblindness works.
        
           | qbasic_forever wrote:
           | Alrighty but the color blind person I know says otherwise and
           | can't use red headlamps...
        
         | munificent wrote:
         | That's not how red-green color blindness works.
         | 
         | They are still able to perceive illumination from red lights.
         | They just can't distinguish its hue from green as well as
         | others.
        
           | qbasic_forever wrote:
           | Right which is why I say it will screw with their contrast.
           | 
           | I say this because someone I know who is colorblind can't use
           | a red headlamp when outdoors. A lot of people use red lights
           | to preserve their night vision, but for this person they
           | can't see clearly with it vs. a white light.
        
         | smolder wrote:
         | Not unless there's a specific type of blindness I'm unaware of.
         | Color blindness only impacts color perception, not perception
         | of luminosity, AFAIK.
        
       | 1letterunixname wrote:
       | San Jose, CA has/had low pressure sodium lights to reduce light
       | pollution for the benefit of Lick Observatory on Mt. Hamilton
       | since at least the early 1980's.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lick_Observatory
        
         | KennyBlanken wrote:
         | It's not to reduce light pollution, it's to have all the light
         | pollution be in an exceptionally narrow band that the
         | observatory can then filter out.
         | 
         | The reason LED lights are so terrible for astronomers is
         | because although they require much less light to achieve the
         | same visibility, the spectrum is very spread out across
         | multiple peaks, with different manufacturers having different
         | peaks.
        
       | pbhjpbhj wrote:
       | It would be nice to get an update from the submitter or some
       | other friendly soul -- are they still used, what reactions and
       | outcomes have they had?
        
         | MonaroVXR wrote:
         | My cousin lives in that village, I will need to ask about it. I
         | lived very close by, let me ask it.
        
         | mikepurvis wrote:
         | If the initiative was discontinued, it hasn't been in the news:
         | https://news.google.com/search?q=Zuidhoek-Nieuwkoop
        
       | mwattsun wrote:
       | I spent months underwater on a submarine and we used mostly red
       | lights in the sleeping quarters and the control room. I don't
       | know the theory, but I figured red lights don't produce the
       | momentary blindness of looking at a white light.
        
         | alephxyz wrote:
         | Red light doesn't overlap as much with the sensitivity of the
         | rod cells in our eyes which are responsible for night vision
         | (see https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1416_Color_Sensi
         | ti...)
        
       | cyberpunk wrote:
       | I think they look pretty cool too:
       | https://www.themayor.eu/uploads/image/file/1031/medium_batst...
        
         | Kognito wrote:
         | Looks like something out of a horror movie.
         | 
         | Does remind me of the old low-pressure sodium street lighting
         | that was popular in the UK when I was growing up. They'd glow
         | pink for a while when they first turned on, before turning a
         | deep orange.
        
           | nemo44x wrote:
           | We had those in the USA as well. If you kicked the pole hard
           | enough you could make it go out for a few minutes.
           | 
           | the light they produced was the best and I wish we still used
           | them, or at least an LED that mimics the orange color.
        
             | cubefox wrote:
             | I remember being teached pole kicking as a drunk
             | teenager...
        
           | petre wrote:
           | I think sodium lights are more pleasant than red light
           | district themed street lighting.
        
           | seba_dos1 wrote:
           | They're still around here in Poland. I don't think they get
           | installed anymore, but where they still work fine they're
           | still there.
           | 
           | I love them. That's the best night-time lightning out there.
           | Blueish LED lightning is unsettling in comparison. These
           | orange street lights are comfortable to eyes and make the
           | streets look pretty.
        
             | actionfromafar wrote:
             | Love the sodium lights. The white LEDs here have a blinding
             | spectrum, also are installed so they glare straight into
             | your eyes. Insane.
        
               | throwawayben wrote:
               | big positive of the LED lights is much less light
               | pollution, but I do wish they could be warmer
        
               | actionfromafar wrote:
               | It's _exactly_ the other way around. Now I 'm afraid this
               | is some kind of common misconception, like "not only are
               | LED great when it comes to efficiency, they don't pollute
               | the light either!"
        
               | xyzzyz wrote:
               | Sodium light is actually pretty great from light
               | pollution perspective, because it is extremely easy to
               | filter it out, as it is a very narrow band. Astronomers
               | prefer sodium lamps, for example.
        
               | actionfromafar wrote:
               | Dead moths prefer sodium lamps too, or something.
               | Currently, LEDs are kind of stupid, too. The parking lot
               | outside my home has fixtures with builtin LEDs which will
               | last, like forever. So there's no need to make the LEDs
               | replaceable like a bulb had to be.
               | 
               | Except they _do_ break (they dim into a faint glow, and
               | the brown out completely) and they have to replace the
               | whole fixture.
        
           | rocqua wrote:
           | They were common in the Netherlands like 15 years ago.
        
         | cultureswitch wrote:
         | Cool but very weak
        
           | AlecSchueler wrote:
           | It's really all you need for eg walking the dog at night.
           | I've only seen them used on streets where cars are very rare
           | especially in the evening.
        
       | dahwolf wrote:
       | Dutchie here. I haven't see these red LEDs become widespread
       | although I do sometimes see dim green lights on bicycle paths.
       | 
       | Another interesting regulation here is related to insulation.
       | Small bats tend to get inside walls and under roof tops. As
       | people are improving insulation en masse, this act may kill or
       | displace these bats. So you have to check for them and make
       | amends if they're there. A common and easy way is to attach a bat
       | home to your house. Some of them are really cool:
       | 
       | https://media.s-bol.com/gJJMmEXxPyRr/781x1200.jpg
       | 
       | I love my little bat friends. During summer months I can time
       | their forage session to the minute. Then I just watch them circle
       | around the garden picking up the mosquitos.
        
         | ChuckNorris89 wrote:
         | _> attach a bat home to your house_
         | 
         | Never knew these were a thing but it's exactly what I expected.
         | Deserves a bat signal.
        
           | doublesocket wrote:
           | We built one into the gable end of our roof during
           | renovation: https://imgur.io/Gc42NPn?r
           | 
           | (and added appropriately bat-wing shaped bargeboards)
        
       | exabrial wrote:
       | How does this compare to sodium-vapor lamps?
       | 
       | Side note: I recently learned that all of the blue/purple street
       | lights are actually defective LEDs:
       | https://www.businessinsider.com/led-city-streetlights-turnin...
        
       | Zamicol wrote:
       | The moon is white. White is the most natural color of light at
       | night. White street lights are probably the most natural
       | approximation.
       | 
       | The article doesn't say anything about white light, but does say
       | "Normal street lighting can affect a bat's flight" but doesn't go
       | into detail. I would love more detail.
        
         | StingyJelly wrote:
         | Definitely not the most natural approximation for the number of
         | moons.
        
         | haarts wrote:
         | The intensity of moon light is on an entirely different level
         | than street lights.
        
         | 40four wrote:
         | Sounds like a marketing 'puff piece' to me. Here, accept this
         | 'fact' about red lights, unsubstantiated by any details or
         | references as truth. And you're going to like it because it
         | supposedly is environmentally friendly. And because it 'feels
         | good' you won't ask any questions and repeat it to friends and
         | family as if it were truth.
        
           | dahwolf wrote:
           | What are you talking about? People exploring nature at night
           | have been using red lights for decades. It's standard
           | equipment.
           | 
           | There's no mystery around the reason to use red light either.
           | Nocturnal animals, especially mammals, have far more rods
           | than cones in their eyes. This means they are much more
           | sensitive to brightness than they are to color.
           | 
           | Red light in practice is far less bright than white light for
           | the same input energy (a bit more complicated than this) and
           | for quite a few animals they may not see it at all or very
           | poorly.
           | 
           | None of this is theorizing, the effect can be readily seen in
           | practice.
        
         | handedness wrote:
         | The intensity of a street light is vastly higher. They
         | typically produce 10x-100x more foot-candles versus a full moon
         | on a clear night at a bright latitude.
         | 
         | Even under ideal conditions, the earth receives <=1 lumen per
         | square meter of light from the moon. A single streetlight can
         | project tens of thousands of lumens (or more) over a relatively
         | small area.
        
         | morsch wrote:
         | Presumably having white light would also not be harmful
         | assuming it's as dim as the moon. Which, don't get me wrong,
         | can get surprisingly luminous, but not when compared to street
         | lighting.
        
         | smolder wrote:
         | > The moon is white. White is the most natural color of light
         | at night. White street lights are probably the most natural
         | approximation.
         | 
         | You say "white" as if there's only one color white, which isn't
         | the case when you're talking about a range of lighting
         | temperatures. The moon also has a unique light profile that it
         | reflects. It's not the definition of white. Either way, if
         | you're advocating for something resembling 6500k daylight white
         | lighting at night, there is nothing at all natural about that.
         | The moon casts a very dim light, even at its brightest.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | WeylandYutani wrote:
       | One of those things that happens when your country is too rich
       | and peaceful.
        
       | downvotetruth wrote:
       | Street lights without motion sensors on side streets are a waste
       | of electricity and a source of light pollution.
        
         | smolder wrote:
         | Some people actually argue it's good for safety and
         | particularly _reducing crime_ , but you won't catch me agreeing
         | with this motivation. I'll bet there is some curb
         | appeal/property value angle, too. People seem eager to abandon
         | reason when it comes to their home equity.
        
       | wouldbecouldbe wrote:
       | Reminds me of windmill, they kill lots of bats & birds.
       | 
       | If we are working on an environment friendly energy alternative,
       | it feel sweird it kills lots of animals.
        
         | jabroni_salad wrote:
         | Do you believe that the aviation lights on the turbines is
         | what's killing the birds, as opposed to the other parts of the
         | structure? such as the spinny blade bit?
        
           | wouldbecouldbe wrote:
           | nah I don't mean the lights, I just mean the general effect
           | of technology we use and not always aware of the side
           | effects. I never hear it as an argument against a windpark
        
       | wyager wrote:
       | I have a hope that over the next 20-40 so years, we see extensive
       | commercialization of digital night vision (not the crap you get
       | on amazon, but the solid-state version of high-voltage IITs that
       | the military is currently testing), flat lenses, and AR glasses,
       | such that we get to a point where acceptable-quality night vision
       | is as ubiquitous as acceptable-quality cameras are now on
       | smartphones.
       | 
       | One of the big upsides of such an outcome would be that we could
       | ditch things like streetlights entirely, cutting back a great
       | deal of light pollution.
        
       | maria1998zx wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | loeg wrote:
       | Bat friendly, human hostile. Not a great trade-off.
        
         | haarts wrote:
         | How is it human hostile?
        
         | jessekv wrote:
         | I hope my town does it too.
        
         | rqtwteye wrote:
         | Why human hostile?
        
           | kazinator wrote:
           | You can't go out at 2 a.m., stand under a streetlight and
           | read a horror novel written in bat blood ink, like you used
           | to.
           | 
           | But that's the point!
        
           | loeg wrote:
           | Check out the picture in the article. Good luck using that to
           | see by.
        
       | maria1998zx wrote:
       | Si
        
       | TulliusCicero wrote:
       | Interesting, but does red lighting not have a different
       | physiological or psychological impact on humans?
        
         | toomuchtodo wrote:
         | Beneficial for human night vision while not being materially
         | detrimental (wrt physiological or psychological impact).
         | 
         | https://www.healthline.com/health/why-not-to-have-red-lights...
         | 
         | https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/2075/does-red-li...
        
         | eternalban wrote:
         | This is looking forward to the day when bats and machines will
         | peacefully coexist bathed in red light.
        
           | dudeinjapan wrote:
           | This would actually be an awesome movie plot. Town adopts red
           | lighting, Dracula moves there, a string of grisly murders
           | ensues, corrupt town bureaucrats refuse to get rid of the red
           | LEDs despite mounting evidence, nightvision/flamethrower-
           | equipped mechs needed to roast out the vampires. Well I guess
           | its not peaceful coexistence.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | lelandfe wrote:
           | More or less the plot of Fallen London
        
       | maria1998zx wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | erikerikson wrote:
       | A whole new meaning for "the red light district", eh Amsterdam?
       | ;D
        
         | 1letterunixname wrote:
         | Maybe there will be outdoor red window boxes for rent.
         | 
         | It's disconcerting to be walking around Amsterdam, turn a
         | corner, and there's a woman dancing in a rented box seeking
         | customers.
         | 
         | Perhaps outdoor lighting would offer more warning.
        
           | capableweb wrote:
           | > It's disconcerting to be walking around Amsterdam, turn a
           | corner, and there's a woman dancing in a rented box seeking
           | customers.
           | 
           | Well, to be fair, it's not really widespread all around the
           | city, it's not like you suddenly turn a corner and there is a
           | surprise box right in front of you.
        
       | mgaunard wrote:
       | Did the vampires take over the Netherlands or something? Why save
       | the bats?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-05-08 23:00 UTC)