[HN Gopher] Pfeilstorch ___________________________________________________________________ Pfeilstorch Author : georgecmu Score : 93 points Date : 2023-05-14 17:49 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org) (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org) | detrites wrote: | Warning: if you're sensitive seeing injured animals. Link has an | image of taxidermy of one. (Though I suppose _all_ taxidermy is | injured animals one way or another...) | the_third_wave wrote: | Animals get hurt all the times - including Homo Sapiens - as a | fact of life. If you're "sensitive" seeing injured animals I | can only advise you to look at more injured animals so you can | get rid of the "sensitivity". Not relish in it, mind you, just | get rid of it. This is how you get rid of hypersensitivity | after all, by exposure to whatever it is you're overly | sensitive to. Avoiding exposure only increases the shock the | next time you get exposed. | | In other words: trigger warnings are counterproductive in that | they cultivate sensitivities instead of counteracting them. | jlnho wrote: | Depends. Some people are heavily traumatized, e.g. from | childhood abuse. The title provides almost no indication as | to what the content might be (OK, maybe a little, but only if | you speak German), so I think it's fair to warn others for | whom this kind of stuff can be a problem. I agree with your | sentiment for "regular people", though. | detrites wrote: | Hard disagree. Some people are hyper-sensitive due to extreme | trauma, which can trigger into all kinds of things that can't | be fathomed by the unaffected. | | It's also something particular to this site. The crossover of | visually-sensitive with those who choose to hang out on one | of the few text-only sites on the internet is probably high. | | The link is bare and with no clue as to the content other | than it goes to "wikipedia", somewhat of click that could be | considered to be safe. To me this justifies a warning. | the_third_wave wrote: | Words like "safe", "extreme trauma" and "warning" used to | relate to physical dangers. They are now more often seen | relating to virtual dangers. Those "virtual dangers" can | lie behind every link, every image that may pop up, every | nook and cranny of the ever-expanding virtual netscape. | They create a culture of fear which does nothing to help | those "hypersensitive" people. | | Here's an example translated to the physical world. Some | people are scared of spiders, you probably know at least | one such person. They don't like being confronted with | octopedal arthropods but they know they will be every now | and then since spiders simply are a fact of life on this | planet whether you like them or not. Would the world be a | better place for these people if every single door leading | to every single room where conditions might be such as to | harbour spiders would be affixed with a warning sign | telling them about the possibility of encountering | arachnids? Every park, every tree, every bush, every crate | of fruit, all of them sporting signs warning them about | spiders "so as to help them in avoiding exposure". I say | they'd end up mortally afraid of them even if they were | only mildly annoyed in the beginning. | FeepingCreature wrote: | I'm an arachnophobe. If people reliably put "cw spiders" | on links to spiders, my life would be a bit better. (Not | a lot, because it's already not that hard to avoid pics | of spiders online.) | | What we're talking about here isn't 'may contain nuts', | it's 'definitely contains actual nuts'. This link doesn't | have a "chance" of seeing a stuffed goose with an arrow | in its neck, that is in fact what is there. Your example | doesn't fit. | zichy wrote: | You seem to be very sensitive to the idea of people watching | out for each other. Maybe you should start watching out for | others so you can get rid of your sensitivity. | [deleted] | threads2 wrote: | [flagged] | hutzlibu wrote: | "This Pfeilstorch was crucial in understanding the migration of | European birds. Before migration was understood, people struggled | to explain the sudden annual disappearance of birds like the | white stork and barn swallow. Besides migration, some theories of | the time held that they turned into other kinds of birds, mice, | or hibernated underwater during the winter, and such theories | were even propagated by zoologists of the time" | | That sounds both funny and bad, but it seems that those | zoologists did not actually believed the weird shape shifting | stuff, but rather the more reasonable theory, that they hibernate | under water. | | " This misinformation lasted all the way into the late 1800s, | when American ornithologist Dr. Elliott Coues listed the titles | of 182 papers dealing with the hibernation of swallows" | | Which had its roots in a rumor " that fishermen in northern | waters sometimes hauled in mixed catches of fish and hibernating | swallows" | | So it is not that ridiculous, since they did not know yet, that | birds cannot breath underwater, but they knew that birds could | dive very long and deep. And fish do hibernate and running water | is still way warmer, than frozen ground. | jameshart wrote: | Wait til you find out where people thought barnacle geese came | from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnacle_goose_myth | ThrowawayTestr wrote: | >Besides migration, some theories of the time held that they | turned into other kinds of birds, mice, or hibernated underwater | | Sentences like these remind you that science is a recent | invention. | canjobear wrote: | How sure are you that you don't hold beliefs that will seem | ridiculous to people in 300 years? | raldi wrote: | Is it really unscientific to consider the possibility that | birds turn into mice when we see eggs turn into chickens and | caterpillars turn into butterflies all the time? | mcculley wrote: | One of the docks I work on is frequented by a pigeon with a | blowdart embedded in its neck. I have tried to catch it a few | times, but I am not sure that removing it would not harm the | pigeon even worse. | | One day I ran across two young men on the dock carrying blowguns. | I remarked that I was wondering how the pigeon ended up with a | blowdart in its neck. They claimed that neither of them were the | ones who shot the pigeon, so it is apparently still a mystery | which local asshole is putting darts in pigeons. | tetris11 wrote: | My mother used to throw stones at sparrows, sprint up to them | as they were dazed, twist their necks, pull out their feathers, | and then roast them for a light snack. She relishes telling | this story every time she sees a small bird resting nearby. Her | one saving grace in my mind is, "hey at least she ate it." | bobbylarrybobby wrote: | Not really any different than eating chicken. At least the | sparrow got to live a nice life in the meantime. | haunter wrote: | A modern spin on this: | | SIM card from stork tracking device have been removed somewhere | in Sudan and someone ended up using it in their own phone racking | up a huge bill for the environmental group. | | https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-44645217 | croisillon wrote: | 2 years ago (20 comments): | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27918399 | FredPret wrote: | Imagine being a dude in Africa. You work _so_ hard making your | arrows nice and straight. | | Eventually you end up with maybe 5-10 in your quiver. You | patiently crawl up to some birds, take aim, and BAM - perfect | shot right through the throat. | | And then the bloody bird flies away _with_ your arrow. | | Edit: I also want to add - poor bird. Must take unreal | determination to fly that far with a near-mortal injury and a | literal weight around your neck | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-05-14 23:00 UTC)