[HN Gopher] Everything you always wanted to know about mathemati... ___________________________________________________________________ Everything you always wanted to know about mathematics (2013) [pdf] Author : ggr2342 Score : 622 points Date : 2023-05-25 12:22 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.math.cmu.edu) (TXT) w3m dump (www.math.cmu.edu) | [deleted] | optbuild wrote: | A finely written book for beginners. I like how it slowly | explains stuff rather than doing in Theorem Proof style short | books. | billfruit wrote: | Does it cover geometry? | fn-mote wrote: | No, as a quick perusal of the table of contents would tell | you. | | For geometry, get a book like Art of Problem Solving's | Introduction to Geometry. That will cover many beautiful | topics in a question and answer style. | | [1] https://artofproblemsolving.com/store/book/intro-geometry | layer8 wrote: | I wish there were such books for more advanced math topics. | SleekEagle wrote: | I wish math had its version of Griffiths | tr33house wrote: | is there a service that can print, bind and mail PDFs with as | many pages as this? It'll be useful for some of the manuals I | have to read too | vishnugupta wrote: | I use this site [1] and can recommend them. Though I don't know | if they are available outside of India. | | [1] https://www.printonweb.in | 01100011 wrote: | I used Barnes and Noble Press a couple years ago to print a | book. Cost $25 or so and was impressed with the results. | tesin wrote: | A quick google turned up this service - | https://www.printme1.com/ | ohwellhere wrote: | $47 for this work via that service | phkx wrote: | There might be a print shop in your area which offers similar | services. Or services which explicitly offer to print thesis, | but they typically require a minimum number of prints. | emacdona wrote: | https://www.lulu.com/ | | I used lulu.com to print a copy of OnLisp [1] | | What I got was one of the best bound paperback books I've ever | held. | | <rant> I wish all publishers would just sell eBooks (and | publish settings like "optimal paper size") so that I could | print my own copy using a service like lulu. One of my biggest | gripes with hardcopy books nowadays is that the paper stock | they use is so thin that the ink on the other side of the page | shows through. Lulu let's you choose the paper stock. I really | can't say enough about how happy I was with the quality of the | printed book lulu sent me. </rant> | | [1] https://www.lurklurk.org/onlisp/onlisp.html | BeetleB wrote: | There are a lot of variables. | | I print them myself and take them to FedEx to do the binding. | Letter size/A4, though, result in big books and a lot of paper. | So I wrote a script that produces a new PDF and reorders the | pages. In the new PDF, you have two pages per side of paper (4 | pages per sheet). The reordering is done so that FedEx can cut | the sheet right in the middle, and put the left half on top of | the right half to get the usual ordering. Then they just bind | it. | | Not counting the cost of my paper, they charge about $11 | (probably can get it a bit cheaper but I add some extras in the | service when I bind them). | Frummy wrote: | Perhaps use the pdf split function to order 4 quarters of the | pdf in separate binds | mindcrime wrote: | In another recent thread, somebody mentioned using some Amazon | feature for doing this. I might be wrong, but I _think_ you | sign up as an author, upload the PDF like it 's your book, then | buy one copy (or request a proof) for yourself, and then delete | it. Maybe somebody who has used this facility can chime in with | more (or better) details... | actinium226 wrote: | If I could read, and understand, a textbook like this in a day, I | would be so happy. Alas, I must only look with longing at the | links provided by HN, thinking wistfully 'someday...' | rg111 wrote: | The key to learning Math in adult life, as I have found- | setting aside 40-180 mintues every day to learn regularly. | | It would be golden if you can create a study group that meets | weekly. Just start a discord/Element room/Zulip/IRC chat and go | from there. | | I am learning Topology as an adult and learned Category Theory | this way. | | This truly works. | | Setting aside time 4-5 days a week works. Make it a habit. | ConnorMooneyhan wrote: | As someone with a B.S. in Pure Mathematics who is now a | programmer, it makes my heart happy to see my true love at the | top of HN. | [deleted] | ggr2342 wrote: | Did you use it at CMU? | ConnorMooneyhan wrote: | No, I actually didn't use this book. By "true love" I meant | mathematics ;) | pmoriarty wrote: | One thing I've always wanted is a comprehensive guide to | mathematical notation, which tells you what symbols mean or at | least what field of mathematics they come from. | | I frequently come across all sorts of weird mathematical symbols | in papers, and of course these symbols are virtually never | explained, so I have no idea what they mean. | | Even better would be if there was some way an LLM could read | through a paper itself and then explain the equations. | SleekEagle wrote: | many books will have a page in the preface that lays out the | notation, even for very common objects. it's hard to make a | cheat sheet for something like this because many symbols are | used in different fields, and even if different subfields of | the same field. | cubefox wrote: | I think that's pretty rare? | ivan_ah wrote: | RE: math symbols | | Check out this excerpt of definitions of basic math notation I | use in my books: | https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/set_notation.pdf It | has some examples of the "alien symbols" [?] (for all), [?] | (there exists), etc. | | One problem (feature?) of math notation is that paper authors | don't follow a consistent convention for symbols, so what | you're asking might not even be possible... It doesn't help | that different math domains might use different symbols for the | same concept! That being said, there is the ISO 80000-2 | standard that defines recommendations for many of the math | symbols, with mentions of other variations, see | https://web.archive.org/web/20210705180417/https://people.en... | You might want to read through that as a starting point. | | Unfortunately, just knowing the notation (being able to read | the symbols) is not usually enough. Understanding each | symbol/concept usually requires knowing the math context and | other related definitions of the domain where the notation is | used. In other words, knowing the notation is not a shortcut | for learning math... But still, I hear you about the need to | select some symbols then right-click and choose "read this to | me" or "explain this to me." | cubefox wrote: | One thing I love about programmers is that they rarely use | complex symbols. They are the complete opposite to | mathematicians in this regard. Basically all programming | languages consist just of ASCII keywords. So when in doubt | about some keyword, you can just use Google and type it in. | Together with the name of the language. | | I guess symbols look fancier and are more concise. | | Also, mathematicians do love their PDFs. No doubt because it | supports their beloved symbols so well. Of course PDFs are | terrible for the Web and screens in general, but only a | programmer would care about _that._ | sorokod wrote: | I doubt that having a "dictionary" attached to a math paper, | something like | | 1. [?] = nabla see https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Nabla.html | | 2. ... | | 3. ... | | would improve your understanding. Notation encodes ideas, it is | the understanding of the ideas that is tricky, not the | encoding. | pmoriarty wrote: | It would actually help. I'd know what fields I need to study | to more fully understand the papers I'm interested in. | | It would also help me figure out what to ask LLMs (or people) | to explain to me. | cubefox wrote: | GPT-4 can probably explain LaTeX formulas pretty well, but | when they are compiled PDFs, the encoded PDF plain text is | often garbage, so GPT-4 probably couldn't understand much. | dwheeler wrote: | If you want to go deeply into formalized mathematics, take a look | at the Metamath Proof Explorer | <https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mmset.html>. It defines a set of | axioms, and formally verifies every proof showing every step | (hiding nothing). | zhte415 wrote: | To echo others on writing style, it's very lucid. This would be a | fantastic coffee table book; not for everyone, but for a | countable number of people. | utopcell wrote: | what group of people is uncountable ? | slopbop wrote: | If I remember correctly, Brendan Sullivan had a reputation as a | TA for Concepts of Mathematics at CMU as "Math Jesus", not sure | if that was a testament to his pedagogical skills or just due to | the long hair and beard... | ggr2342 wrote: | Where is he now? Why doesn't he write more books like this? I | mean in this lucid explanatory style. | foobarbecue wrote: | "This work is submitted in partial fulfillment of the | requirements for the degree of Doctor of Arts in Mathematical | Sciences." | | So does that mean this is his PhD thesis? What's a Doctor of | Arts? | shwestrick wrote: | It's a doctoral degree with a heavy emphasis on pedagogy and | teaching. From https://www.cmu.edu/math/grad/phd/index.html: | | > The Doctor of Arts degree shares all requirements and | standards with the Ph.D., except with regard to the thesis. The | D.A. thesis is not expected to display the sort of original | research required for a Ph.D. thesis, but rather to demonstrate | an ability to organize, understand, and present mathematical | ideas in a scholarly way, usually with sufficient innovation | and worth to produce a publishable work. Whenever practical, | the department provides D.A. candidates with the opportunity to | use materials developed to teach a course. While a typical | Ph.D. recipient will seek a position that has a substantial | research component, the D.A. recipient will usually seek a | position where research is not central. | hapidjus wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Arts | witchesindublin wrote: | I like how the book is written in a teaching style rather than a | textbook style. | uldo wrote: | Beautifull! Is there similar book on physics? | Koshkin wrote: | Susskind's series does a pretty decent job walking the reader | through topics in (theoretical) physics. At a somewhat more | advanced level, you can try Schwichtenberg's No-Nonsense books. | I also enjoyed Stevens' The Six Core Theories of Modern | Physics. | ivan_ah wrote: | Do you mean basic physics like mechanics (PHYS 101) ? If this | is what you're interested, check out my MATH & PHYS book. | Posted link to it in another comment this thread. | abhayhegde wrote: | I'd say the Feynman Lectures of Physics [1] volumes cover a | broad base with some topics in great detail as well. | | [1]: https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/ | rg111 wrote: | No. | | Feynman Lectures, to be properly understood requires one to | be at least an advanced undergrad. | | Most people just use it as home decor and many use it like a | novel. | | To _properly_ appreciate the material, you need training in | Physics. Otherwise you will be getting much less. | dexter89_kp3 wrote: | this is awesome | 1equalsequals1 wrote: | https://pimbook.org/ Read this instead | Koshkin wrote: | Read both. | fn-mote wrote: | That book has a completely different focus... breadth instead | of understanding argumentation. | | I agree that the Programmer's Introduction to Mathematics is | more likely to contain useful content (instead of being about | how to develop the ability to reason carefully). It also has a | LOT more breadth than the OP. | | The free part of Chapter 3 "On Pace and Patience" is a key very | important attitude toward learning from this book (especially | on your own). If you are thinking about studying from this | book, make sure you philosophically agree. | | I tried to copy and paste a paragraph here, but it looks like | it has been ROT-13 encoded in the PDF (or something)! | | > [...] mathematical culture requires being comfortable being | almost continuously in a state of little to no understanding | It's a humble life [...] | zdms wrote: | Its using ROT25 -\\_(tsu)_/- | anthk wrote: | It looks a lot like Gentle Introduction to the Art of | Mathematics. | no_wizard wrote: | Does anyone know of an entry level book that could take someone | through say, high school math to college alegbra / calculus? | | This is my singular biggest hurdle in going back to school to | finish my degree and I'd love to fill the gaps I have around | mathematics so I can not only finish my degree; I'd also like to | participate in some more advanced computer science that rely | heavily on underlying computation. | steppi wrote: | It's not one book, but for everything before calculus it would | be difficult to beat the books in Israel Gelfand's High School | Mathematics Correspondence Curriculum [0]. These are designed | for self study and give a fresh perspective on topics they | cover. | | [0] https://www.goodreads.com/series/318605-gelfand- | corresponden... | wyclif wrote: | Excellent recommendation; they are very good books to start | with. Concepts are clearly explained and I wish every | mathematics textbook was structured like this. Some people | are biased against these books because they're Soviet, but I | find that attitude parochial. If we're judging textbooks on | their merits alone, these will get you to Calculus. | rg111 wrote: | For this partcular purpose, look no further thank Khan Academy. | | I recommended a lot of people these courses and myself went | over a few videos to revise Trigonometry. | | I can vouch for the quality. | dataviz1000 wrote: | Curious if I could find another interesting way to learn math | for someone who hasn't gone to college, I asked chatGPT to | cluster 20 animal emojis by taxonomy and use them to explain | Affinity Propagation like I'm 5 year old. (I'm an idiot.) More | or less, the lion emoji wants to be friends with the tiger | emoji more than the dog emoji with some explanation of the math | and math symbols in between. | | ``` For example, when Scar wanted to be king, he sent a | "responsibility" message to the other big cats, trying to | convince them that he should be the leader. However, the | "availability" message he received back was weak because most | animals didn't trust him. | | Meanwhile, Simba sent out a strong "responsibility" message | showing he could be a good leader, and in return, he got a | strong "availability" message back with many animals showing | support. That's why Simba was a better leader for the Pride | Lands, according to Affinity Propagation! | | ``` | nemexis wrote: | I absolutely adore the works of John Bird: | https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Jo... | | it really takes you from the ground up all the way to advanced | subjects. He published multiple books on various levels of | mathematics. | ajmurmann wrote: | I love this book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17406856 | | The explanations are great and the examples and excises are | such that you can just do them in your head. | ivan_ah wrote: | I think you might like my book "No Bullshit Guide to Math & | Physics"[1,2,3], which contains a condensed review of high | school math (a.k.a. algebra and precalculus), then explains | PHYS and CALC topics in an integrated manner. | | [1] website https://minireference.com/ [2] PDF preview and | sample chapter = | https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/noBSmathphys_v5_pr... | [3] concept map = | https://minireference.com/static/conceptmaps/math_and_physic... | | If you prefer something focussed on a review of high school | math topic, then you might prefer the "green book" instead, see | https://nobsmath.com/ | jayro wrote: | At Math Academy (https://mathacademy.com), we created a series | of courses, Mathematical Foundations I, II, & III, that will | take a student from basic arithmetic through calculus and | prepare them for university-level courses like Linear Algebra, | Multivariable Calculus, Probability & Statistics, etc. You can | jump in at any with an adaptive diagnostic that will custom fit | the course to you based on your individual strengths and | weaknesses. | | https://mathacademy.com/courses/mathematical-foundations-i | https://mathacademy.com/courses/mathematical-foundations-ii | https://mathacademy.com/courses/mathematical-foundations-iii | | We also have courses on Linear Algebra and Mathematics for | Machine Learning: | | https://mathacademy.com/courses/linear-algebra | https://mathacademy.com/courses/mathematics-for-machine-lear... | | It's not free, but our adaptive, AI-driven algorithms makes it | the most efficient way to learn math that you're going to find. | We've had numerous students master 3-5 years of math in a | single year. | | We're still in beta and haven't done a proper Show HN yet, but | we're getting there! | | I'm the founder, so I'd be happy to answer any questions. | pmoriarty wrote: | _> our adaptive, AI-driven algorithms makes it the most | efficient way to learn math that you 're going to find_ | | Can you elaborate on this? What do these algorithms do? | jayro wrote: | Geez, I'm trying to figure out how to describe in a short | paragraph or two what it would take a book to explain. | Here's my best shot. | | We've created an extensive knowledge graph representing all | of mathematics (3,000 topics and counting) from 4th Grade | Math up through our university-level material, and our | algorithms traverse the graph to identify the optimal | learning tasks to assign to the the student at any point | based on their performance on previously completed learning | tasks: diagnostics, lessons, reviews, quizzes, etc. | | There are actually multiple graphs, including one that | defines the direct prerequisite relationships between | topics as well as one that describes encompassing | relationships (e.g. the topic on Solving Two-step Linear | Equations fully encompasses the topic on Solving One-step | Linear Equations Using Multiplication), but there are other | graphs as well. | | In addition, the algorithms have to deal with spaced | repetition, which is vastly more complicated to sort out | within the context of a hierarchical knowledge structure | with both full and partial encompassings. (Without | encompassing relationships, the backlog of reviews would | quickly slow progress to a crawl). | | We actually have some deep-dive writeup in the works that | attempt to explain how all of this works at a level that | will be accessible to most people, but it's more than I can | describe here, unfortunately. | | Anyway, I hope this helps a little. | no_wizard wrote: | When I am ready to dive into this again, I will definitely | look at this. I know I need concrete time dedicated to this | sort of thing (repetition is the only way to master it | really) but I'll circle back around to this soon! | Gerard0 wrote: | Looks great and was ready to sign up but I surely wasn't | expecting that price! I am not saying it is not worth that, | but as someone who has tried to start learning math on my own | only to quit afterwards for whatever reason, it's a big risk | to take. | Math-Ninja wrote: | Hi Gerard. | | Math Academy does not charge your card for the first 30 | days. If you find it's not a good fit for then you can | cancel within this period and you won't be charged. 30 days | hopefully gives you enough time to determine whether it's a | good fit or not. | admsmz wrote: | I've been a paying customer since October last year. I | discovered it after someone recommended it in a hackernews | comment. | | I'm guessing you're mentally comparing this to all the | possible books you could buy instead for that price. But | how many of those books would you actually read, let alone | finish? A better comparison is, having an MIT educated math | tutor on call for $50 a month. | | I have a bachelors in physics but it still feels great to | learn new things that my education skipped. For example, we | skipped singular value decomposition at my university in | the interest of time. Mathacademy says, screw it, we're | teaching everything! | jayro wrote: | I guess you have to think about it like this. | | How much would it be worth to you to learn 3-5 years of | math in a single year without getting stuck? And I mean | really learning it to the point where you're able to solve | the more difficult problems and are not merely able to | recognize some of the symbols and terminology and talk like | you know it. If you're just kind of curious about some | advanced math topics you see pop up on HN from time to time | and aren't really willing to invest any real time, effort | or money into learning the material, which is totally fine | and is probably where most people reading this comment are, | then sure, spending more than $40 on a book or watching | some free online videos will seem expensive. | | But the reality is that very few people will be able to | learn a significant amount of math by simply working | through some problems in a book. Eventually they'll get | stuck or just run out of gas, and when I say eventually I | mean probably in 2-3 weeks. But if you're that one student | who successfully taught themselves multiple courses worth | of mathematics on their own from a few books and outside of | any educational institution, then hats off to you! You're | like that guy who put on 30 pounds of muscle doing pushups | and pull-ups at the local park. You know, ... that ONE guy. | ;) | | But if you want a sure fire way of mastering a large amount | of mathematics as efficiently and painlessly as possible, | then you want a system like Math Academy that will adapt to | your individual learning curve and knowledge frontier and | push you through the material using the most effective | pedagogy available - careful scaffolding, active problem- | based learning, spaced repetition, gamification, etc. | | The bottom line is this. Our system is more effective than | any course available and is much cheaper for what you get. | In fact, we just had a group of students ages 11-13) start | with basic pre-algebra in the fall of 2021 (as in Solve x - | 4 = 10) and from what I've heard all did extremely well on | the AP Calculus BC exam a couple weeks ago. That's like 6-7 | academic years of math in 18 months and we're expecting | mostly if not all of them to earn a 5 (the top score). | | But take my word it. Try it out for yourself. You | automatically get a full refund if you cancel in the first | 30 days, so there's no risk. And we're always available to | answer your questions and support your progress. | rodneyzeng wrote: | I did not see any content related to number theory and | combinatorics (or counting) in the list of courses. | jayro wrote: | We should have those courses ready within the next year. | Multivariable Calculus should be available in another few | weeks, then Probability & Statistics at the end of July, | then Methods of Proof, followed by Discrete Math, and | Abstract Algebra later this fall. But courses in Number | Theory, Graph Theory, Combinatorics, Real Analysis, etc. | are all planned. | graycat wrote: | Very fast calculus: Consider a standard car with a speedometer | (reports how fast are going) and an odometer (reports how far | have gone). | | Easily enough we can take the speedometer readings, say, 1 time | each second, and calculate a good approximation to the odometer | readings. That is a 1 second approximation to the calculus | operation of _integration_. | | Similarly we can take the odometer readings, say, 1 time each | second, and calculate a good approximation to the speedometer | readings. That is a 1 second approximation to the calculus | operation of _differentiation_. | | If we use smaller time intervals than just 1 second, then we | will usually get a more accurate approximation. It is a theorem | that, under mild assumptions, as we let the lengths of the time | intervals shrink toward 0, the results of the operations will | reach limits and quit changing. | | Those limiting values are the actual definitions of | differentiation and integration. | | No big surprise, under mild assumptions, if we start with the | odometer readings, differentiate to get the speedometer | readings, and integrate to get back the odometer readings, then | we really will get back the odometer readings. That is the | fundamental theorem of calculus. | | Some common mild assumptions are basically that the speedometer | readings change only continuously (no jumps) over time and we | are working over only finitely long time intervals. | | Newton's second law of motion | | force = mass x acceleration | | essentially guarantees the continuity of the speedometer | readings and, thus, justifies the integration back to the | odometer readings. | | Of course, calculus and Newton's second law of motion are close | cousins in both theory and applications -- no big surprise | since Newton essentially created both (might mention Leibniz | and some others). | | Can quickly show that if we integrate time t, we get (1/2)t^2. | So if we differentiate (1/2)t^2 we will get back t. | | A calculus course will show how to differentiate and integrate | a wide variety of mathematical expressions, polynomials, sines | and cosines, products, quotients, _composite_ expressions, | etc.. E.g., differentiate sine(t) and get cosine(t). | Differentiate cosine(t) and get -sine(t). Can also find many | cases of arc lengths, areas, volumes. | | Suppose we are starting a business. At time t, let the revenue | be y(t). Suppose we have argued that as we reach all our target | customers, our monthly revenue will be b. Suppose we argue that | due to word of mouth advertising the rate of growth is | proportional to both the number of happy customers talking and | the number of target customers not yet customers listening. | Denote the rate of growth of y(t), that is the derivative, by | y'(t). Then for some constant of proportionality we should have | | y'(t) = k y(t) ( b - y(t) ) | | Of course we know current revenue, say, at time t = 0, that is, | y(0). | | Then by the first weeks of calculus, can show that, with TeX | syntax, | | y(t) = { y(0) b e^{bkt} \over y(0) \big ( e^{bkt} - 1 \big ) + | b } | | More generally | | y'(t) = k y(t) ( b - y(t) ) | | is an example of an _initial value problem of a first order, | linear, ordinary differential equation_ and an introduction to | a course in ordinary differential equations. | | Calculus has wide applications to physical science, | engineering, economics, finance, spread of diseases, etc. | engineer_22 wrote: | Check out Kahn Academy, they have a gamified course to guide | you through the equivalent of a high school and early college | math curriculum. AFAIK it's free? | culi wrote: | Khan Academy is great. When I was taking AP calculus in | highschool I failed to complete any homework and barely | passed the class. But when it came time for the AP test I | binged Khan Academy videos for 3 days beforehand and ended up | getting a 5 (the max score). Great resource and even | bingeable | alphameese wrote: | Specifically these three courses [0][1][2] will take you from | basic algebra to precalc. They're very thorough and I've | found them extremely useful in upgrading my high school level | math skills. I have heard that their calculus courses aren't | sufficient though, and that it should be learned from | somewhere else. | | [0]https://www.khanacademy.org/math/math1 | [1]https://www.khanacademy.org/math/math2 | [2]https://www.khanacademy.org/math/math3 | bloemheuvel1 wrote: | Would you recommend this path over doing the Algebra 1 -> | Geometry -> Algebra 2 .... etc path? | alphameese wrote: | The Math 1-3 courses intersperse all of those courses and | provide a more streamlined path. I would personally | recommend using those 3 courses to learn up to pre-calc. | engineer_22 wrote: | https://www.khanacademy.org/math | diebeforei485 wrote: | I found this to be a good explanation of Calculus in | particular: http://lightandmatter.com/fund/ | | It assumes you have some algebra, but does not require college | algebra. | quickthrower2 wrote: | Interesting! No touch on probability/stats though? Or calculus? | fn-mote wrote: | This is a book about writing proofs. | | It is intended to develop that skill, not introduce you to a | breadth of topics. | mbork_pl wrote: | Well, there's too much of (modern) mathematics to touch | everything - even everything important... One of the most | important notions is that of _compact sets_ , and it's not even | mentioned. Neither are groups (well, they _are_ mentioned, but | not much else), etc. | | From a quick skim of the ToC this looks very well thought-out. | Looks like an excellent book! | billfruit wrote: | Does it touch geometry? | bannedbybros wrote: | [dead] | nailer wrote: | Slightly off topic - does anyone know a 'reader mode' for PDFs? | | I frequently look at PDFs online and am looking for a tool that | reformats the PDF into a single column, so I can just scroll, | absorbing the content. | adamgordonbell wrote: | At some point I was interested in learning to read and write | proofs. | | I did the "Introduction to Mathematical Thinking" MOOC from Keith | Devlin. The curriculum is available as a book as well. | | The class is basically how to write and read proofs for non-math | majors. It starts pretty slow, but gets harder at some point. The | number theory proofs were fun. | | You 'got to' grade others proofs online, and they graded yours | which was an interesting way to get familiar with reading and | writing proofs. | | I recommend it because instead of an area of math it focuses on | what it means to prove something. And the teacher is pretty | entertaining. | | https://www.amazon.ca/Introduction-Mathematical-Thinking-Kei... | | https://www.coursera.org/learn/mathematical-thinking | lmwnshn wrote: | Judging by the URL, this book was used for CMU's 15-151 / 21-128, | which is a first-semester course for CS and math undergrads. | Nowadays, the course uses [0]. | | [0] https://infinitedescent.xyz/ | rgrmrts wrote: | I remember using Mathematical Thinking [0] for Concepts of | Mathematics (21-128) which is also a great book! | | [0] | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/445059.Mathematical_Thin... | temp51723 wrote: | That book was used in my "intro to higher math" class my | freshman year. A very humbling experience, seeing that cover | again gave me a bit of a knot in my stomach. | lawrenceyan wrote: | https://infinitedescent.xyz/dl/infdesc.pdf | roter wrote: | Thanks for this resource. It also serves as a LaTeX math | example --- the source for the book is provided. | rickstanley wrote: | Does this replace the OP? Or is "An Infinite Descent into Pure | Mathematics" a complementary book? | lmwnshn wrote: | My link replaces; we did not use OP's book when I took the | course. | | That said, OP's book looks more conversational in tone, which | I personally have a slight preference for. | lying4fun wrote: | Every chapter of the OP book has an introduction which has | the following subchapters: Objectives, Segue from previous | chapter, Motivation, Goals and Warnings for the Reader. Which | I really appreciate and I think its a great way to teach | stuff, especially mathematics, since all those chapters | contextualize the coming topic in various ways. (E.g. I | imagine 'Motivation' does this with respect to the history | and origins of the idea and 'Segue from previous chapters' | contextualizes it with reference to the stuff reader has | learnt so far. I didn't read anything yet but it looks | promising | mmmmpancakes wrote: | fancy name for what seems like a fairly standard "intro to | proofs" textbook, at least based on the ToC. | RedPanda250 wrote: | Can someone share how this compares to Math for Computer Science | by Lehman, Leighton, and Meyer ? | https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.042/spring17/mcs.pdf | Alifatisk wrote: | I love the style, I'll download it when I get home. Is there | anything similar but for statistics? | rubergly wrote: | Came here to ask the same question. Really hope there are some | good recommendations! | cubefox wrote: | If you search this post for "statistics", you find several | recommendations (over similar books): | | https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xg3hXCYQPJkwHyik2/the- | best-t... | cubefox wrote: | Note that these are 700 pages which could take multiple years (if | you're doing it in your spare time) to go through. I'm not sure | who would have the motivation and discipline for this. | l33t233372 wrote: | It might, but it shouldn't. There are 8 chapters and most of | the content in the first 7 shows up in any run of the mill | "Introduction to Higher Mathematics" or whatever that | university decides to call their first actual math class, | although occasionally combinatorics will replace number theory | content. | abhayhegde wrote: | Most of the books are meant to be consumed in parts. This book | explicitly mentions "Segue from previous chapter" for most | chapters indicating what key concepts are continued in | exploring/building new ones. Also, I believe any reader on HN | can make sense quickly of the basic definitions needed to | understand a concept in isolation. | | However, mathematics is especially known to require continuous | dedication for years to attain any sort of mastery. | eimrine wrote: | Kids, cherry-picking students of other disciplines, those who | really understand what is a good read. | Koshkin wrote: | > Everything you... wanted | | Far from being "everything" anyone would want or need, it's | rather "some (fundamental) things" you _must_ know. A couple of | pages a day, on average, would get you there within one year. | cubefox wrote: | Still, I'm in doubt that a significant proportion of us would | have the discipline for this. One reason why some things are | pretty much only learned in university is that they provide | the necessary motivation. | shae wrote: | I collect interesting problems and learn the math that can | solve them. I do best by directly connecting fun and | learning. | shanusmagnus wrote: | I've been very interested in this method for a while. How | do you find the math that would solve them? Is it well- | understood, or is it easy to figure out in practice? | Would love to hear more about how this looks for you | practically. | BeetleB wrote: | It depends on how rigorous/detailed you want to be. This is at | most two semesters worth of material, and has a very shallow | learning curve (hence the large PDF). If you've been exposed to | these ideas, you could cover it in a semester. I'd say it's | quite doable in a year in your spare time. | | If you drop the combinatorics chapter, it is definitely doable | in one semester. | | For example, Chapter 7 is 100 pages. In Tao's analysis book, he | covers the same material in 42 pages. | evanmoran wrote: | As a CS major who went to CMU years ago, my favorite book from | all of my professors was for my 15-213 class called Computer | Systems: A Programmers Perspective | | I remember at the time the book was in loose leaf paper so it | warms my heart to see the book has a 3rd edition. It was used as | a core part of teaching assembly, memory representations, and | getting students ready for the operating systems class. When I | help people learn to program, it's the only book I think is a | must have: | | https://www.amazon.com/Computer-Systems-Programmers-Perspect... | wbrd wrote: | Going through this now and it's great | GitPushOrigin wrote: | Is there a book or resource you'd recommend for operating | systems? I recently finished CS:APP and really enjoyed it. | Though I've been programming for ~7 years and felt that made it | easier to digest. | BanazirGalbasi wrote: | We used this for my Computer Architecture class in college and | it's one of the few textbooks that I wish I had kept around. I | had a used copy so not selling/returning it to the bookstore | really wouldn't have been too impactful at the time. Now that | I'm wanting to get back into low-level programming, I miss it | even more. | rg111 wrote: | > it's one of the few textbooks that I wish I had kept around | | What are the other books that keep around or wish to keep | around? | donkey-hotei wrote: | +1. This book changed my life. Wouldn't be doing what I'm doing | today without it! | istjohn wrote: | This looks great! Does anyone know of any solution sets for the | exercises or other resources with similar problem sets with | solutions? | hgsgm wrote: | Art of Problem Solving website and books. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-05-25 23:00 UTC)