[HN Gopher] Tarkovsky's films online for free ___________________________________________________________________ Tarkovsky's films online for free Author : bookofjoe Score : 260 points Date : 2023-05-27 17:46 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (kottke.org) (TXT) w3m dump (kottke.org) | nathias wrote: | always have been | dang wrote: | Related. others? | | _How 'Stalker' claimed the life of Andrei Tarkovsky and his | wife_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32588569 - Aug 2022 | (1 comment) | | _The Drenching Richness of Andrei Tarkovsky_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29782009 - Jan 2022 (79 | comments) | | _The Drenching Richness of Andrei Tarkovsky_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26132544 - Feb 2021 (1 | comment) | | _The Drenching Richness of Andrei Tarkovsky_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26126004 - Feb 2021 (44 | comments) | | _Andrei Tarkovsky's Message to the Young: "Learn to Be Alone" | (2015)_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22196779 - Jan | 2020 (91 comments) | | _Andrei Tarkovsky - Poetic Harmony [video]_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11601651 - April 2016 (18 | comments) | | _Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7107215 - Jan 2014 (52 | comments) | dho9yr wrote: | [flagged] | dho9yr wrote: | [flagged] | haunter wrote: | Funny that he actually already blogged about this back when they | became available in 2010 (Mosfilm since introduced a new channel | guess that's where the newness come from) | | https://kottke.org/10/07/tarkovsky-films-online-for-free-vie... | rickstanley wrote: | If anyone is wondering if there's any relation with the | S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games, like me: > While not a | direct adaptation, the video game series S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is | heavily influenced by Roadside Picnic. The first game in the | series, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl, references many | important plot points from the book, such as the wish granter and | the unknown force blocking the path to the center of the zone. It | also contains elements such as anomalies and artifacts that are | similar to those described in the book, but that are created by a | supernatural ecological disaster, not by alien visitors. | | from Wikipedia: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadside_Picnic#Adaptations_an..., | unfortunately no concrete reference to actual interview or | statement from the developers is provided in the page. | | Also, about Metro 2033 (game): > The book is | referenced in the post-apocalyptic video game Metro 2033. A | character shuffles through a shelf of books in a ruined library | and finds Roadside Picnic, he states that it is "something | familiar". Metro 2033 was created by individuals who had worked | on S.T.A.L.K.E.R. before founding their own video game | development company. The game was based on a novel of the same | name which also took influence from Roadside Picnic. | thriftwy wrote: | The game is more like the Stalker movie than the book. | | In the book there were research missions and active urban life | as well as smuggling, whereas the movie is spearheaded on going | through the Zone while uninvited. The movie also has the post- | apoc vibe whereas the book does not. The whole point of book is | co-existence of the unknown with normal(ish) human society. | dho9yr wrote: | [flagged] | mdswanson wrote: | It might help new viewers to understand that Tarkovsky viewed | film as art, not entertainment. As such, he purposely avoided | strong narratives or plots, instead focusing on poetry, mood, and | time. | | From the book "Sculpting in Time" by Tarkovsky himself: "I find | poetic links, the logic of poetry in cinema, extraordinarily | pleasing. They seem to me perfectly appropriate to the potential | of cinema as the most truthful and poetic of art forms. Certainly | I am more at home with them than with traditional theatrical | writing which links images through the linear, rigidly logical | development of the plot. That sort of fussily correct way of | linking events usually involves arbitrarily forcing them into | sequence in obedience to some abstract notion of order. And even | when this is not so, even when the plot is governed by the | characters, one finds that the links which hold it together rest | on a facile interpretation of life's complexities." | StrangeATractor wrote: | Weird fact about Stalker, they were shooting in disused USSR | factories that had just been left as-is -- a lot of people on set | got cancer not much longer after shooting, likely from being | around so much industrial waste. | | It's also way better than the book it was based on IMO ( | _Roadside Picnic_ ). | ConanRus wrote: | [dead] | lightdot wrote: | > a lot of people on set got cancer not much longer after | shooting, likely from being around so much industrial waste | | Is there a credible source for this statement? | jFriedensreich wrote: | the main source seems to be the sound technician and two | members of the set dying of the same form of cancer. | https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/stalker-killed-andrei-tarkovsky | bookofjoe wrote: | That's interesting to me: I found the book far more compelling | than the film. | | "Roadside Picnic" pdf: https://soviethistory.msu.edu/wp- | content/uploads/2015/10/pic... | Toutouxc wrote: | IMO the Stalker game is like the darkest and most raw take of | the general theme, the movie is the most philosophical and | artsy take and the book is somewhere in the middle. And | they're all worth it. | sfpotter wrote: | Hard to compare. They're completely different in terms of | plot, mood, style... everything, really. Roadside Picnic has | the signature Strugatsky Bros dark comedy running through it, | while Stalker really has no comedic elements whatsoever. I | prefer the book, for what it's worth. OTOH, I prefer the film | Solaris to the Lem novel. | aidenn0 wrote: | I need to reread _Solaris_. I read it when I was like 14 so | it was a bit beyond me at the time. | cubefox wrote: | Coincidentally, the German translation of Roadside Picnic | has an afterword by Lem. | pavlov wrote: | The Stalker shooting locations are actually close to Tallinn in | Estonia, a former Soviet republic that's an EU and NATO member | today. So if watching the film turns you into a super fan, it's | not too hard to go visit the sites! | BulgarianIdiot wrote: | I want cancer | jFriedensreich wrote: | that is so crazy i was in one of the shooting locations | yesterady by accident (it is now a kultural venue location) | and wondered why an area there had the name "stalker", of | course i thought about my favorite movie but i never | considered it being filmed where i live. thanks for this mind | blow | wahnfrieden wrote: | The film was also lost in a lab and completely reshot | | edit: by lost I mean the usability was lost. it was destroyed | in chemical process. thx for pointing out it was just half. but | his textural differences are explained also by technique, he | did it in his other works even through his late career (mixing | sepia segments, different processing even in his final film) | Ryder123 wrote: | It wasn't lost but something went wrong with the film | development on about half of it. I believe that's why it has | two such distinct film styles (which also happens to work | quite well for the film). | sorokod wrote: | Link to the Mosfilm YouTube | | https://m.youtube.com/@Mosfilm_eng/videos | mark_l_watson wrote: | I just bookmarked three of these. I have watched Tarkovsky's | version of Solaris at least 3 times (and the American version | with George Clooney and Natascha McElhone 5 or 6 times) - I love | that story and both movies are so very good! | cubefox wrote: | Sounds like you would also like the novel. The Kindle version | is a new translation by Bill Johnston. The previous one was a | flawed retranslation (from Polish to French to English). | hamilyon2 wrote: | English hardsub is a savage move. | | Looks like all movies are hardsubbed | haunter wrote: | Mosfilm actually has 2 channels and the original older one has | normal YT subs, but the movies are more geolocation restricted, | they are not available in the US, UK, Canada. | | Solaris for example | | https://youtu.be/6-4KydP92ss | | https://polsy.org.uk/stuff/ytrestrict.cgi?ytid=https%3A%2F%2... | jwilk wrote: | What's the other channel's URL? | JKCalhoun wrote: | Better than harddubbed? | xixixao wrote: | I watched a random segment from Stalker, the embedded movie, and | at 15:10 the woman gets in the car and the subtitles say "Come | with me", while the character clearly says "Go!". Very confusing. | The auto-generated subtitles got this one word right but have | other gaps. So warning if you're gonna watch these that the | subtitles might not be perfect. | jamal-kumar wrote: | I've found subtitles in general to be really off the mark after | learning a few more languages, but at least it's actually | possible to tell that they got it wrong if it's a subtitle and | not a dub I guess? | | It's still insanely jarring and really messes with the | experience if you speak the subtitled language and notice that | over and over. | nologic01 wrote: | The cinema of directors like Tarkovsky and Bergman can only | nominally be termed "movies". | | A combination of deep introspection, reflection on the human | condition and achingly beautiful photography makes them all-time | masterpieces, up there with the most important achievements of | human culture. | 2h wrote: | [flagged] | pizza wrote: | If you're cringing to the description "achingly beautiful" by | cringing, you're saying you find their description | beautiful.. | shakow wrote: | More generally, heaps of old Soviet movies are available in HD | (and often subtitled) on Mosfilm YT channel, putting you a yt-dlp | away from a movies night. | | https://www.youtube.com/@Mosfilm_eng | Jun8 wrote: | IMHO, if you'll be watching your first Tarkovsky film start with | _Stalker_ , which is how my girlfriend (now wife of 27 years), | introduced me to him many years ago. I was very much a Fellini | person, and the Bergman-Tarkovsky school seemed cryptic (at best) | at the time. When finished, ask yourself (1) if you would have | gone into the room and (2) what the dreamlike sequences with | Stalker's son meant. | | Second one should be _Solaris_ , if you're into SciFi or _The | Mirror_ if you're not of if you'd like a challenge. I think _The | Mirror_ is the better movie, the woman (stand in for T's mom) | looking at the wheat field (T had these _specifically_ planted | for the film!) haunts me to this day. | | I personally couldn't relate to The Sacrifice, perhaps his most | personal film. His earlier films (Ivan and Rublev) I could not | watch at all. | | To be a genius artist like him in the Soviet Union meant | privileges unheard for art film directors in Europe (let alone | US), eg see the wheat field thing above. It also meant you're at | the mercy of the "masses". I had read an article once that | included a comment for _The Mirror_ from a regular filmgoer, | saying after 30mins it caused such a headache! The funding was | based on such feedback and the movie was labeled as elitist (it | is) which greatly impacted his career. It's infuriating to think | T lost time due to such petty interference (OTOH, I could only | finish the film on my third try, falling asleep in first two | attempts! So she had a point) | EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK wrote: | >> Stalker's son | | Um, daughter. | Jun8 wrote: | You're absolutely right, called Martyshka (little monkey) | same as in the book. As I was searching for material on her | on Google I came across this interesting article: | https://przekroj.pl/en/society/the-stalkers-daughter- | renata-... | thriftwy wrote: | > my girlfriend (now wife of 27 years), introduced me to him | | I like how some men have mercantile fears about their women, | but they forget to fear that their girlfriend may _alter their | inner self_. That obviously also cannot be undone. | f6v wrote: | I don't get what you're talking about. | thriftwy wrote: | You start dating someone, you become another person with | different customs and passions. The more you invest in | relation, the more is the difference, unless you had | exactly the same prior background. | weekendvampire wrote: | Yes, that is a good thing. | thriftwy wrote: | Go watch Marvel then. Objectively good guys on display, | always getting the bad ones. | upsetdiscourse wrote: | Ok, tell us what you know about personal volition | protectionism. I'm interested. | coldtea wrote: | How some "alpha/sigma" male types think women are | after/will get their money (I understand the parent to mean | by "mercantile fears"), but they don't fear that they will | affect their psyche/personality. | | Which I find a little odd, as these types, do absolutely | fear that a lot (e.g. their fear that women would | effeminate them, or make them docile, or p...whip them, and | so on). | coldtea wrote: | > _His earlier films (Ivan and Rublev) I could not watch at | all._ | | Those also require a familiarity and understanding of the | relevant culture of those places. | dr_kiszonka wrote: | Stalker is a beautiful movie but perhaps not the easiest one to | watch, especially if you are not used to 10 min long shots of | nature (e.g., water in a stream). Possibly Solaris, which you | recommend too, would be an easier movie to watch first. | ecks4ndr0s wrote: | His book(Sculpting in Time) is a great read btw! | pavlov wrote: | It's actually five films because "The Passion According to | Andrei" is simply the original longer cut of "Andrei Rublev". | | I believe Tarkovsky himself preferred the final cut which is 20 | minutes shorter (but still over three hours, so not exactly a | cinematic snack). | galaxyLogic wrote: | Tarkovski's movies have what you could call a Russian sentiment. | Hard to put in words what exactly that means but perhaps some | fatalism and melancholy, how things are what they are and do not | easily change except in our dreams. Looking back at Soviet Union | and now Putin's Russia, and even the autocratic Czarist Russia | before revolution, it is easy to understand where that sentiment | comes from. But it makes for great, thoughtful art. | | Another great Russian movie from a contemporary director of | Tarkovski is "A Few Days from the Life of I.I. Oblomov": | | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079619/ | tpm wrote: | And that sentiment is replicated by the director Andrey | Zvyagintsev, in e.g. The Return (2003) or Leviathan. Both great | movies with beautiful cinematography and very Russian feeling. | triska wrote: | _Solaris_ in particular seems more relevant than ever with the | rise of ChatGPT and other generative AI services that do not | understand what their outputs mean to us, and often produce eery | simulacra of life. | | The final scenes of Solaris show this situation brilliantly in | that their content matches the way it is shown: The scenes | themselves mirror the depicted content with perplexing | compositions, zooms and transitions, almost as if they were | themselves created by an entity that does not understand the | content or medium: | | https://youtu.be/Z8ZhQPaw4rE?t=9489 | | Quoting from the book: | | _" QUESTION: Do you mean, for example, that the hands didn't | move as human hands would move, because the joints were not | sufficiently supple? | | BERTON: No, not at all. But . . . these movements had no meaning. | Each of our movements means something, more or less, serves some | purpose . . . "_ | Der_Einzige wrote: | Solaris is by far his best movie, even better than STALKER | (which is itself excellent). It seems many have not seen it. | They are missing out. | wheelerof4te wrote: | STALKER created an entire franshise on it's own. Which to | date has a very dedicated community. | | It is one of the best psy-films of all time. | tezka wrote: | It's one of his most accessible movie, and usually resonates | with tech people for obvious reasons. His best movies imo are | Mirror, Ivan's Childhood, Andrei Rublev, Stalker and then | Solaris, Nostalgia and Sacrifice. | | Now Solaris book by Lem is far superior to Tarkovsky's | rendition. | jimbob45 wrote: | I really didn't enjoy the ending of Solaris and, for that | matter, The Little Prince. You don't need to have a punchy | ending for me not to feel like I wasted my time with your | movie. It's okay to let the journey stand on its own rather | than throwing in a climax that feels haphazard and | spontaneous. | cubefox wrote: | The original Solaris novel had a different ending, a | disillusioned reflection by Kelvin, which I found much | better. It was probably not dramatic enough for a movie, | too analytical. | pmoriarty wrote: | I love _Stalker_ , and I'm a huge Tarkovsky fan, but hated | _Solaris_. It doesn 't hold a candle to _Stalker_. | | I also like Tarkovsky's _Mirror_ and _The Sacrifice_. | wahnfrieden wrote: | (His worst and most overrated) | | edit re: slowness, it's a lot less slow than his final few | works which I also adore. they're all great I just think the | rest of his catalog gets less good word simply for | drastically less popular exposure. | [deleted] | amanaplanacanal wrote: | It's definitely a lot slower paced than our current ADD | society is used to. An esteemed director like Kubrick's | movies would seem unbearably slow to many. | addled wrote: | I think Kubrick's movies are fantastic, deep, | atmospheric, thought provoking. True art. | | I have never made it all the way through one without | falling asleep. 2001, Blade Runner, Dr. Strangelove.... | Even movies loosely associated with Kubrick like A.I. | cause me to nod off. I have to stop when I'm nodding off | and come back later fresh in order to finish. | | Maybe it would be different if I had seen them in | theaters. | 2-718-281-828 wrote: | > 2001, Blade Runner, Dr. Strangelove.... | | Gladiator was also amazing! | 4ndrewl wrote: | Love that film. "No, I'm Spartacus!" Classic. | 2-718-281-828 wrote: | spartacus, spartacus the merciful \o/ | twelve40 wrote: | Gladiator was shot by Ridley Scott, just like Blade | Runner. Kubrick (who i love) is so legendary, he really | should just get credit for every great movie in existence | )) | pmoriarty wrote: | I've never fallen asleep while watching 2001. It's | definitely slow, but riveting for me, because (like | Tarkovsky's film) there's a lot of meaning in the scenes, | and they give me a lot to think about. | tezka wrote: | Blade Runner is not a Kubrick film. | addled wrote: | You're right. My mistake for lumping that in there. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-05-27 23:00 UTC)