[HN Gopher] CPR's true survival rate is lower than many people t... ___________________________________________________________________ CPR's true survival rate is lower than many people think Author : rntn Score : 94 points Date : 2023-05-29 19:09 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.npr.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org) | Gordonjcp wrote: | You can't make dead any deader. | | It might work. You may as well give it a shot, if only to say | "well, at least I gave it a shot". | sccxy wrote: | Do your best to give their family $200k medical bill. | lljk_kennedy wrote: | Or not, if you're not American. | Vaslo wrote: | Or prioritize your funds to pay for your healthcare, like | most responsible Americans do. | sccxy wrote: | Two-thirds of people who file for bankruptcy cite medical | issues as a key contributor to their financial downfall. | | What most people do not realize, according to one | researcher, is that their health insurance may not be | enough to protect them. | | https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/11/this-is-the-real-reason- | most... | fsckboy wrote: | healthcare still costs regardless of who pays for it. | | And the countries with the most comprehensive socialized | systems also pride themselves on their civic-mindedness, | think about others, not just yourself: shouldn't you, out | of civic duty, balance trying to save the public money at | the same time as you decide whether you save a life? | Gordonjcp wrote: | Why would they get a "medical bill"? | hnthrowaway8860 wrote: | [flagged] | dghlsakjg wrote: | Generally CPR is performed when there is no pulse or breathing as | a last ditch effort to keep a brain viable until a full medical | team can do their work. | | In other words CPR is performed on people who show no signs of | life/are already dead. | | The survival rate for the control group is 0, so it is kind of a | miracle that anyone survives. | brianwawok wrote: | It's not that simple. People who do not get CPR live. Others | who get CPR didn't need it. Control group of 0 is missing the | complexities of real life. | groestl wrote: | I was actually surprised to learn that survivors are in the upper | single digits. After all, when you start CPR, people are already | dead. Personally, I had to do CPR twice (as a paramedic), and | sadly neither of the patients survived. | Faaak wrote: | Maybe dumb question here, but does it at least help to salvage | the organs later on (if the donor was okay with it) ? | uberuberuber wrote: | Critical care medic here. Adult CPR at least has some evidence in | its favor on a population level, but only as a bridge to using | electricity. CPR alone is merely slowing deaths arrival. | | There is NO evidence to support any of the commonly used advanced | cardiac life support drugs in terms of functioning brain leaving | the hospital. Epinephrine (for arrest, not shock or anaphylaxis), | atropine, lidocaine, amiodarone, procainamide, digitalis, etc. | Its electricity or bust. | | Just one of many reviews on this: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4129833/ | JumpCrisscross wrote: | Would it make sense for households with those at risk of heart | attack to invest in an AED? | rdmirza wrote: | Even better is installing an implantable cardiac | defibrillator (ICD) in those at high risk. | noughtme wrote: | > at high risk. | | Before an event? I'm not sure what insurance would cover | this. I don't really want open heart surgery before I need | it. | Calavar wrote: | Plenty of insurance plans cover ICD implantation because | it is recommended by the American College of Cardiology | for specific situations: | | 1. moderately to severely reduced systolic function of | the heart due to a heart attack that persists > 40 days | after the heart attack | | 2. severely reduced systolic function of the heart of any | cause that does not improve after 3 to 6 months of | pharmacologic therapy | | 3. personal history of sudden cardiac death with a | persistent risk factor | | ICD implantation is not open heart surgery. It is a | relatively quick procedure that is done by a cardiologist | rather than a cardiothoracic surgeon. | robbiep wrote: | The most common cause of sudden cardiac death is blocked left | anterior descending artery. | | Generally this is unknown until it happens. | | It kills 250,000 Americans every year. | | It would make the most sense for people above 50 with a | family history of heart disease to have a CT coronary | angiogram or for those above 40 to have a Cardiac Calcium | Score to risk stratify for future CTCA. | | Distributing AEDs is infrastructure heavy and indiscriminate | because you don't know who actually needs one. | moffkalast wrote: | Well as long as it only kills Americans, then the simple | solution is to emigrate /s | ericd wrote: | At $1k, it's not a no-brainer, but it's also not that | expensive in the context of the risk it counters. | w10-1 wrote: | "only as a bridge to using electricity" | | The key point is that the AED (automatic electric | defibrillator) will tell you if you have a shockable rhythm. | | Many modern AED's can be used by untrained people, so if you | see a cardiac arrest, find the nearest AED and deliver it | and/or follow its (brief) instructions. Once you know this, | you'll start tracking the last one you saw, and you'll find | them more ubiquitous than you realized (and start advocating | for one in your office). | | (And if you are doing CPR, the breathing part is less important | than the chest compressions. Blood flow is more important than | oxygenation. But always/only follow current | guidelines/training.) | bsder wrote: | > (And if you are doing CPR, the breathing part is less | important than the chest compressions. Blood flow is more | important than oxygenation. But always/only follow current | guidelines/training.) | | The problem is that this advice is situational. | | If electrocution is what caused the cardiac arrest, it is | much better to give breaths than compressions. The heartbeat | system resets itself before the respiratory system. The | problem is then that the heart is back, uses up all its | energy reserves, but there is no oxygen to replenish and the | heart goes back into arrest. | brianwawok wrote: | As far as I can tell, many modern CPR classes dropped the | breath part. Just focus on the chest part. | thaumaturgy wrote: | Sort of. CPR classes are divided into, at least, "CPR" and | "BLS". Your basic CPR class may be a hands-only training, | but the BLS classes still include rescue breathing and AED | use, along with infant care. | dathinab wrote: | worse CPR doesn't do what people think it does | | CPR is not a live saving measure, it's a temporary live extension | if it's not followed up with other measurements it's likely to | not save a live. And that's assuming it does work, and is done | correctly. | | but anyway it gives people another chance at live they most | likely wouldn't have had otherwise | [deleted] | YetAnotherNick wrote: | > The traumatic nature of CPR may be why as many as half of | patients who survive wish they hadn't received it, even though | they lived. | | It's the peak of coming up with data to make a story. The study | was only for old people with chronic disease, where lot of them | wouldn't want any life saving treatment let alone CPR. And even | in that group if >50% of said they were happy to have gotten CPR. | hirundo wrote: | "The 2000 Federal Cardiac Arrest Survival Act grants those who | administer CPR or use an AED immunity from civil charges, except | in instances of willful misconduct or gross negligence." | | That should make it less risky to try and help in the U.S. But | apparently it can still be a choice that's easy to get wrong. | That makes me less likely to jump in as a bystander, and to bias | intervention toward healthier looking victims who look like they | could tolerate the treatment. | | https://www.cprcertified.com/blog/can-you-be-sued-for-perfor... | [deleted] | dghlsakjg wrote: | On the other hand: More payouts are made for people NOT | providing lifesaving care when they should. | | https://newsroom.heart.org/news/legal-risk-of-not-performing... | querez wrote: | Not sure what the situation is in the US, but I've taken 3-4 | first aid courses in my life (it's compulsory to get a driver's | license where I live). Every time, they told us that CPR survival | rates were abysmal if we aren't also using an AED. IIRC, with an | AED the survival rate goes up significantly -- though this | article states that in-hospital survival rates are only at 17%, | which indicates it's not all that great with AED, either. | willmadden wrote: | Yeah, sure NPR. I'll take the CPR thank you very much. Next. | dang wrote: | Could you please review the site guidelines and stick to them? | Your comment here broke quite a few of them, including: | | " _Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of | what someone says, not a weaker one that 's easier to | criticize._" | | " _Please don 't post shallow dismissals, especially of other | people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something._" | | " _Don 't be snarky. [...] Edit out swipes._" | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | willmadden wrote: | I didn't break the rules you cited. There is literally no | comment to which I could respond. The OP linked a terrible | article from a state sponsored news source without any | comment. | | If I'm dying, I'll take the CPR. It's better than the | alternative. | themantalope wrote: | Weird way to say that people should talk to their doctors about | how they want to die before the time is upon them. | | Major problem in the US. See it every day at my job. | zackkatz wrote: | This article doesn't really address statistics for younger | people. I feel like the headline should be: should elderly people | be given CPR? For me the answer is a strong no. Why on Earth | would you give CPR to a 90-year old person!? | | > survival after out-of-hospital CPR dropped from 6.7% for | patients in their 70s to just 2.4% for those over 90 | boringg wrote: | What's the point of this article? Are we trying to get rid of CPR | now so that people don't bother doing it because it has a low | success rate? It is literally a last desperate effort to save | someone in a really bad situation. | | I don't think anyone is under the allusion that CPR has like a | 95% success rate do they? | MengerSponge wrote: | Doing CPR is scary and hard, and if it's okay to teach people | that while it probably won't work, it won't make things worse, | and if you're lucky it'll save a life. | | Transparency is a small kindness to help the people who do CPR | not beat themselves up when it (probably) fails. | | *illusion (sorry) | groestl wrote: | I think the risk that people don't even start if they worry | about survival rates is higher. | henry2023 wrote: | > it won't make things worse | | Maybe you should read the article. | dghlsakjg wrote: | One of the preconditions for CPR treatment is that the | patient has no heartbeat. The patient is dead, or going to | be dead (depending on how you define dead) very shortly | without CPR. | | So, while the side effects of CPR can be pretty bad, not | receiving CPR means guaranteed death. | | That's what people mean when they say it won't make things | worse. | robotresearcher wrote: | The title of the article is "A 'natural death' may be | preferable for many than enduring CPR". | | Living bit longer, likely with your original problem, | plus newly busted ribs and scared out of your mind, may | well be worse than death today. | | If I have advanced cancer or dementia, or terrible | injuries, and my heart stops, please leave me be. | oatmeal1 wrote: | I would recommend reading the article. | matkoniecz wrote: | Make people aware that performing CPR on terminally ill people | is not self-evidently a good idea. See "A 'natural death' may | be preferable for many than enduring CPR" which is a title. | | > She has written about performing chest compressions on a | frail, elderly patient and feeling his ribs crack like twigs. | She found herself wishing she were "holding his hand in his | last dying moments, instead of crushing his sternum." She told | me that she's had nightmares about it. She described noticing | his eyes, which were open, while she was performing CPR. Blood | spurted out of his endotracheal tube with each compression. | | > "I felt like I was doing harm to him," she told me. "I felt | like he deserved a more dignified death." | boringg wrote: | Agree completely - in that instance the individual should | have some kind of DNR bracelet. That burden falls on the | communication of the individual to wear something indicating | DNR or requires an assessment at the time by the first | responder to decide it isn't worth trying to save the | individual and provide comfort instead. | | I think that assessment by a first responder is a very | difficult decision to put on someone. | yarg wrote: | Survival rates aside, CPR on the elderly can be particularly | brutal. | | CPR is basically beating the crap out of someone in order to | drag them back from death. | | You're talking about inflicting serious damage on people who | take damage more easily, struggle to recover and are | significantly more likely to suffer medical complications from | even minor injuries. | | We like to place human life in an echelon of the sacred above | all other life - and sometimes this leads to us being kinder to | our pets than we are to ourselves. | | A healthcare system that prioritises quality over quantity of | life could yield better results, but that's not going to happen | as long as things are controlled by a gluttonous hydra of an | industry that has a fiduciary duty to its stockholders, but no | real duty of care to the patients. | nordsieck wrote: | > I don't think anyone is under the allusion that CPR has like | a 95% success rate do they? | | When I was first taught CPR in school, it was taught without | any reference to the survival statistics. The impression I got | was that it was very effective. | | I don't know about 95% success rate, but I'd bet a lot of | people think it has at least a 70% success rate. | querez wrote: | When I was thought it, it was clearly pointed out to me that | chance of survival is ~5%, but increases significantly if an | AED can be used in time. I've also been told about the rib | cracking etc. Just as a counterpoint. | basisword wrote: | What use is this information though to someone performing | CPR? It's important in the sense that maybe better techniques | can be developed but if I need CPR it doesn't matter one bit | if the person doing it knows it's success rate. In fact | probably better they don't know. If they know the odds are | low perhaps they'll give up too soon. | WJW wrote: | I could see an argument that knowing the statistics could | help the CPR-giver in the aftermath. After all the patient | is _very_ likely to die and if the CPR-giver was under the | impression that it is likely to work, then they may feel a | lot of unwarranted guilt. | throwaway173738 wrote: | I was taught it was not terribly effective except in case of | lightning strike. We weren't taught how to do it in | Mountaineering-Oriented First Aid because of that, and | because the leadership, wound care, trauma, and specific | conditions aspects of the course took almost the whole three | days. | yarg wrote: | I know a dude who's a very competent ambo, he saw a man | collapse and immediately rebooted his heart with a single | perfect strike to the chest. | | Beyond the prior state of the patient, technique can actually | matter as well - but the fact is that the vast majority of | people are never going to develop skills beyond "ah ah ah ah | staying alive". | BloominOnion wrote: | Sounds like he administered a precordial thump. | asperous wrote: | The article links a source and says "In real life, people | similarly believe that survival after CPR is over 75%" | bscphil wrote: | The real problem with the article is that it's conflating two | things: the absolute rate of survival for cardiac arrest | after CPR, and the relative rate of survival for cardiac | arrest after CPR (versus doing nothing). | | > In real life, people similarly believe that survival after | CPR is over 75%. | | I'm just a medically ignorant rando, my naive guess was that | people survive cardiac arrest without intervention 30% of the | time (per the article, the actual rate is 7.6%). Unless you | measure people's beliefs about this, you won't be able to | determine whether 75% is a good rate or a bad one. | | Apparently bystander initiated CPR, out of the hospital, | increases those odds to 10%. That means that a _third_ more | people will survive if bystanders initiate CPR. That seems | ... really good to me? In the hospital, survival after CPR | goes up to 17%, which is an increase of 2.2 times! It 's | actually pretty comparable to someone having naive guesses of | 75% CPR survival vs 30% without CPR. (My actual guess was | that CPR made a difference about 20% of the time, so _all_ | these numbers are way better than that.) | beams_of_light wrote: | I guess we're in a state where any reporting is meant to change | behaviors? | George83728 wrote: | When the American Red Cross trained me in CPR, they told me | this statistic, and told me that the reason they told me this | was so that I wouldn't blame myself if the victim dies anyway | (the most likely outcome.) | jeffrallen wrote: | This was true in a recent Swiss training as well. | ghostpepper wrote: | They link a study where they polled people shortly after a | family member was admitted to the ICU about the effectiveness | of CPR. | | My partner is a nurse, so I already knew that the odds of | community-delivered CPR were about 10% (although now I'm | curious how those odds change when an AED is available) and | about the cracking of ribs. | | I think what this article could've emphasized more is that more | people should learn about and consider Advance Directives and | DNR (do not resuscitate orders), particularly for patients who | are nearing the end of their natural life. | | As it reads now it seems to suggest that bystanders should not | bother doing CPR in the community, which I think is incorrect | and borderline dangerous advice. | Gordonjcp wrote: | > (although now I'm curious how those odds change when an AED | is available) | | AEDs are fucking magical. | | They even talk to you to tell you how to use them. | | If the need arises, get the AED and get going. | koheripbal wrote: | Isn't an AED only useful for tachycardia? I'm case of | drowning, heart attack, or most other causes of a stopped | heart, it isn't useful, correct? | tux3 wrote: | I think AEDs can also pace these days if it's brady (but | not asystole) | tialaramex wrote: | The AED does not restart hearts, it can't do that, the | shock disrupts an abnormal rhythm, allowing the restart | to potentially take place automatically. But if your | heart has _actually_ just outright stopped, you are | basically dead. | | Clinicians report as little as zero success for patients | in asystole (ie their heart has plain stopped). Some | studies report a little higher, but it's also possible | those rates are mistaken diagnosis, ie you see a flat- | looking ECG, you treat anyway, maybe 1% of patients | survive - but maybe that 1% were actually not really in | asystole. | | If you have a heart attack, both an AED and CPR are | inappropriate, your heart is still working it's just that | the blood isn't going where it's needed. You need | immediate medical treatment. While an actual cardiac | arrest (which would warrant an AED and CPR) is much more | likely during a heart attack, it is not inevitable and | these treatments are _not_ prophylactic. Meanwhile your | focus needs to be on alerting other people to your | problem, so that they can get you medical treatment, and | if you do go into cardiac arrest they can perform CPR or | use an AED once that becomes appropriate. | josephcsible wrote: | > you see a flat-looking ECG, you treat anyway, maybe 1% | of patients survive - but maybe that 1% were actually not | really in asystole. | | Isn't that basically the no true Scotsman fallacy? | tedunangst wrote: | False positive paradox. | tialaramex wrote: | Maybe? | | Sometimes, when our measurements differ from what we can | explain with our understanding of the universe, that's | because we didn't understand the universe properly. If | you put the Sun in the middle, your model of the solar | system is still weird nonsense with planets on their | circular orbits needing to swing backwards or accelerate | forwards for no reason - until you make the orbits | _ellipses_ instead and then it 's almost like fucking | clockwork. | | But sometimes, you were just right, and the measurements | were off a bit, and there was no real physical | phenomenon, you were just bad at measuring. | | So, maybe sometimes the human heart does actually stop, | yet it can successfully be restarted and then carry on as | normal, and the circumstances where this is true are just | fairly uncommon and when people are peering very | carefully at the results they never ran into one of these | rare cases. I cannot rule that out. | User23 wrote: | Right. Doing nothing has a near zero recovery rate for cardiac | arrest. | | Any intervention needs to be judged against the real | alternatives and not some imaginary ideal case. | williamDafoe wrote: | The real point of CPR is to bridge their life while you rush to | get them an AED. Without the AED the chance of their heart | restarting permanently is vanishingly low ... Last few times I | had first responder training it was said to be less than 15% | chance of survival for a patient given CPR, and you'll only hear | about this if you ask. | | The last time I had first responder training the guy sitting next | to me was drowned by a surfing accident but it was his great | fortune that on shore there was a national expert giving rapid | water rescue training and they had this guy out of the water and | his heart restarted in 5 minutes. So that is why he was taking | first responder training himself! | User23 wrote: | Thumpversion sometimes works too. Interestingly it was also | invented by Dr. Bernard Lown, who is best known for inventing | the DC defibrillator. | robbiep wrote: | It almost never works, unless you are seeing a witnessed | cardiac arrest and know how to administer. That is the right | 'indication' for a precordial thump, but the success rate is | still terrible. | spacechild1 wrote: | I didn't know about the low success rate of CPR, but I have been | very well aware of the potential damage. When I was a paramedic | (as an alternative to military service) I once had to perform CPR | to an old lady and I heard her rips crack. One of the worst | experiences in those 9 months... | markoman wrote: | You're kinda burying the lede here... Was this woman | resuscitated by your efforts and do you know how long she | survived afterwards? | lotsofpulp wrote: | *and with what quality of life did she survive? | | If I am 85 years old, maybe it is better for me to move on. | EA-3167 wrote: | CPR + Old Lady + Not in a hospital = Almost certainly didn't | survive, or live well if she did. | mikepurvis wrote: | Yeah, that's what I got from lifeguard training. The best | chance of doing anything positive with it is going to be on | an otherwise young and healthy person whose heart stopped | due to a very unusual trauma. | | And CPR and artificial respiration is never a miraculous | eyes-opening recovery like in the movies-- it's pretty much | just putting oxygen in the brain to buy a few extra minutes | for the ambulance to arrive and take over. | spacechild1 wrote: | Correct :-( | EA-3167 wrote: | I'm sure you did everything you could, the sad fact of | life is that eventually it ends. | spacechild1 wrote: | Ah, sorry! I heard afterwards that she was declared dead when | she arrived in the hospital... | lkbm wrote: | I was taught that if you aren't breaking ribs, you're doing it | wrong. | karagenit wrote: | I don't think that's right. Sometimes the cartilage will | break which can sound similar, but broken ribs is a serious | condition that can lead to internal bleeding and such. | | > Broken ribs are present in 3% of those who survive to | hospital discharge, and 15% of those who die in the hospital | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardiopulmonary_resuscitatio. | .. | contingencies wrote: | I was taught you are supposed to break the cartilage. | mjevans wrote: | Salient data from the article: | | TL;DR CPR slightly increases the odds for someone otherwise | healthy and young but is much less effective for the old and the | chronically ill. | | IIRC from prior CPR classes (own life data), 'correctly done' | chest compressions are extremely violent, they often break ribs | to get that compression of the heart between the rib cage and | spine. It's a last-ditch effort with COSTS. If there's an AED | around to use instead that would be FAR more preferable. | | """ But the true odds are grim. In 2010 a review of 79 studies, | involving almost 150,000 patients, found that the overall rate of | survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest had barely changed | in thirty years. It was 7.6%. | | Bystander-initiated CPR may increase those odds to 10%. Survival | after CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest is slightly better, but | still only about 17%. The numbers get even worse with age. A | study in Sweden found that survival after out-of-hospital CPR | dropped from 6.7% for patients in their 70s to just 2.4% for | those over 90. Chronic illness matters too. One study found that | less than 2% of patients with cancer or heart, lung, or liver | disease were resuscitated with CPR and survived for six months. | """ | starwatch wrote: | > 'correctly done' chest compressions are extremely violent. | | For a good visual of this take a look at a LUCAS machine in | operation [1]. I'm a (retained) firefighter and have seen | paramedics deploy a LUCAS - it's quite a thing to behold. | | > If there's an AED around to use instead that would be FAR | more preferable. | | Sadly AED's aren't always appropriate. They need a "shockable | rhythm" - that is if your heart is in ventricular tachycardia | or ventricular fibrillation [2]. | | One interesting fact I recall reading (source long forgotten | ...) is that collapsed women are less likely to be helped with | AED's by passers by. This is because they feel uncomfortable | uncovering the chest to apply the AED pads. | | [1]: https://youtu.be/G-oPJV1LYaE?t=314 | | [2]: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart- | arrhyth... | deanCommie wrote: | Holy shit... | | I had _read_ that chest compressions for CPR are much more | aggressive than people imagine and rips being broken is not | uncommon. | | The first few seconds of that clip though made me physically | wince with discomfort... wow! | EA-3167 wrote: | This is sadly true, a friend and colleague of mine passed | away about 7 years ago from sudden cardiac arrest. There was | an AED in the building, but unfortunately he was in asystole, | nothing there to shock. | | Having said that AED's do save a lot of lives, but like CPR | they aren't magic. | Eji1700 wrote: | I swear this comes up every 2-5 years. It's insanely violent, | doesn't work as well on the elderly (like literally everything | else), and is still better than nothing. Things like this | almost feel like fear bait. It's intuitive that a procedure | performed on someone who's dying is ALWAYS going to be less | effective on the elderly. So long as it's not killing more | people than it helps (extremely unlikely given the whole | "you're not breathing/your heart has stopped" qualifier) it's | still an important thing to know. | henry2023 wrote: | About 93% of the time it's worst than nothing. | mjevans wrote: | For bystanders, the raw numbers from the article reflect a | 7.6% survival rate became a 10% survival rate. An absolute | improvement in about 24 out of 1000 cases, though for those | that do 'survive' maybe a 33% increase? | | Though those numbers strongly hint at over simplified | variables. Is there other medical help available? (E.G. an | AED, maybe combined with CPR?) Is EMS close? Are they near | a medivac capable landing site and a level 1 trauma center? | How does this change across patient demographics? | | For my own health, this goes back to end of life management | questions, can I recover or even improve to a degree if a | procedure is done? As someone with hopefully decades and | maybe even a chance at upload or archival if I live long | enough CPR probably is worth it for the cases where | survival is improved; but only if all the other options are | exhausted first. | dghlsakjg wrote: | The doing nothing treatment leads to death 100% of the time | since you don't do CPR on people with a beating heart. | pessimizer wrote: | _Slightly_ worse than nothing; saves a tiny bit of exercise | for someone. 7% of the time it saves a life. | michael1999 wrote: | Quality of life is not a boolean variable. "CPR-induced | consciousness" sounds like a truly terrible way to go, and | likely to cause real suffering in the practitioner/torturer. | frederikvs wrote: | > If there's an AED around to use instead that would be FAR | more preferable. | | AEDs still require chest compressions. In fact, they'll give | you rhythm to follow and talk you through it. | | I would expect a very similar rate of injuries from | compressions - perhaps a bit less if the AED means the | compressions don't need to be performed for the same length of | time. | hnthrowaway8860 wrote: | If you are ever in the situation, what will you do? | | I will certainly peform CPR. Even after reading the article. | Why? Most likely the person is dead anyway, no harm done. But | if I don't do it, chances are their family sue me for millions. | Especially in the US. Unlikely to succeed, but the risk is far | from 0. If they win, my life is ruined. I the face of that, I | might even consider a settlement for a large sum. Also | terrible. So yeah, sorry old ladies. | | Such articles, a much as I appreciate the educative effects, | could even make this worse, since if it's more widely known | then I could get sued in either case. Like, I did CPR, lady | dies anyway but there were clear signs that she suffered. | Great, now I'll have a lawsuit in addition to the trauma of | having crushed the ribs of an old lady. | mjevans wrote: | I'm not really fit enough to compress properly, nor have I | been in CPR training recently. | | In an emergency my support role would be better spent on | comms support or managing other trauma. | asdfjasgoinio wrote: | [dead] | three14 wrote: | Complete anecdata, but a few months ago a neighbor of mine | successfully resuscitated another neighbor with CPR. There was an | AED present, but from what I heard, it did not recommend a shock. | The person who collapsed is around 70 years old. Sometimes, it | does work! There clearly are some cases where it would be crazy | not to try it. | dheera wrote: | I'm a survivor of cardiac arrest and was resuscitated with an AED | and CPR. I've gone through a lot but I'm glad to be alive, have | an implanted ICD now, and I'm glad some employee didn't refuse to | do CPR on me. | | I wasn't conscious for the event and the entire following week, | but they didn't break any of my ribs. Maybe the AED allowed them | to be less violent. | zahma wrote: | Sounds like you were fortunate to have multiple people around, | an AED nearby, and someone well-trained. You're probably right | that AED helped prevent physical damage, though that may also | be due to good technique and or your anatomy. The sooner that | the AED goes on and restarts sinus rhythm, the fewer | compressions required. | | Happy to hear you are doing better. | dheera wrote: | Yep it happened at a boat race, so there were paramedics | already on-site. On one hand I was told to avoid competitive- | intensity sports in the future, but I was also super | fortunate that it all played out at a boat race and not while | climbing some mountain. And having the ICD means I can still | hike non-strenuous mountains. | anonymousiam wrote: | I was dead on the street at 15 after being hit by a car (my | fault). A good Samaritan stopped, administered CPR and | resuscitated me. Forty six years later and I never got to thank | him. I only know his first name (Mark). | | CPR is a good thing and hopefully this article will not make | people think twice before administering it. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-05-29 23:00 UTC)