[HN Gopher] Albert Camus
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Albert Camus
        
       Author : guerrilla
       Score  : 114 points
       Date   : 2023-05-30 18:03 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (plato.stanford.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (plato.stanford.edu)
        
       | Popeyes wrote:
       | I read The Stranger after many many years and my overriding
       | impression was that Mersault was autistic and wondered whether
       | Camus had found the absurdism through someone who was
       | neurodivergent
        
       | zvmaz wrote:
       | The Algerian writer Kateb Yacine had interesting things to say
       | about Camus [1]. As he says, it is true that in his novels,
       | Algerians are almost non-existent, although the novels happen in
       | colonial Algeria and he himself lived amongst them. Another
       | brilliant Algerian writer, Mouloud Mammeri, had similar things to
       | say about Camus [2]... These then colonized writers had different
       | perspectives on Camus' outlook.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WBHq-m5WHQ
       | 
       | [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P1eA8NeUKU
        
         | whearyou wrote:
         | [flagged]
        
           | dang wrote:
           | Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and
           | flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly.
           | It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
           | 
           | If you wouldn't mind reviewing
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking
           | the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be
           | grateful.
        
         | namdnay wrote:
         | > As he says, it is true that in his novels, Algerians are
         | almost non-existent, although the novels happen in colonial
         | Algeria and he himself lived amongst them
         | 
         | The term "Algerian" itself would need to be defined. Camus was
         | born in Algeria, he would have called himself Algerian, just
         | like someone born in Corsica would call themselves Corsican.
         | 
         | What is certainly true is that the society (like many colonial
         | administrations) was racist and highly stratified. the pieds-
         | noirs (descendants of immigrants from western europe) were
         | "below" the french expats/public servants and their families
         | (but could get a leg up from the former, as did Camus), but
         | "above" the arab community (who themselves would look down on
         | the kabyle, who themselves were above the other berberes etc..)
        
         | alexfoo wrote:
         | _The Meursault Investigation_ is a worthy follow-up read to
         | _The Stranger_.
        
         | matthewaveryusa wrote:
         | It's somewhat ironic that both interviewers are critiquing
         | Camus as ~ colonial-washing Algeria -- in French.
         | 
         | What's the point in bringing up Camus stating he would save his
         | mother over Algeria as something telling about his work?
         | 
         | When I read l'etranger I found the emptiness of the world lead
         | me into feeling the absurdity as an emotion versus a thought
         | experiment.
        
           | BasedAnon wrote:
           | Algeria has a lot of identity issues, the intelligentsia
           | almost exclusively communicate in french, while the lower
           | classes speak a mutant hybrid of Arabic-French-English (the
           | English is mostly present with zoomers due to internet
           | exposure)
        
       | steve_adams_86 wrote:
       | > For the Camus of The Myth of Sisyphus, however, "Should I kill
       | myself?" is the essential philosophical question. For him, it
       | seems clear that the primary result of philosophy is action, not
       | comprehension. His concern about "the most urgent of questions"
       | is less a theoretical one than it is the life-and-death problem
       | of whether and how to live.
       | 
       | I've read Camus before (and thoroughly enjoyed it), but I hadn't
       | come across this before.
       | 
       | I'm not suicidal and I don't want to come across as someone to be
       | concerned about, but I find this question similarly engrossing. I
       | should read this.
       | 
       | I came to love philosophy a lot in my early 30s, but an eerie
       | result I suppose is that it has caused me to feel a deep sense
       | of... Perhaps I should say irrelevance. I find it difficult not
       | to think in terms of much larger than practical timelines, or
       | about people other than myself. I don't feel as much like an
       | individual as I did, but more like a part of humanity as a whole.
       | From this lens, my presence here is wholly unnecessary.
       | 
       | I often wonder if my problem could be that I grew up in an
       | intensely individualist society and I lack the tools to answer
       | Camus' question from this less familiar lens. How can I function
       | in an individualist society with desires to be pro social towards
       | others now and in the future, to a degree that is meaningful such
       | that life would be "worth" living? Such that I'd feel I impacted
       | the world in a way sufficiently aligned with my values?
       | 
       | Of course I'm positing here that my values are what makes life
       | worthwhile. This question is somewhat hypothetical and I know
       | everyone will ask this question with different parameters and
       | weighting. That's fine.
       | 
       | Again, not about to go jump under a cement truck. I enjoy
       | selfishly loving my kids, pursuing hobbies, and simple things
       | like sitting in the sun and smelling the warm resin of a nearby
       | tree's needles in the air while gnats flutter together in a beam
       | of light. Or a simple bowl of warm rice with sesame seeds and sea
       | salt with some greens from the garden. My youngest son climbing
       | on me to cuddle and enjoying that while reflecting on his older
       | brothers doing the same years ago (though not anymore). Life, in
       | the most banal and trivial ways, is incomprehensibly beautiful
       | for those of us fortunate enough to get to enjoy it. But what am
       | I doing here if others are suffering and my joy amounts to
       | nothing at best, yet likely a net negative for others?
       | 
       | Camus actually played a major role in me recognizing some of my
       | most egotistic behaviours. His ideas aren't particularly unique I
       | suppose, but what cut through me is how he expressed them.
       | 
       | For example, a stoic from 2000 years ago might discuss the urgent
       | importance of living by virtuous values with integrity, and while
       | many (especially Epictetus) did a good job of undergirding the
       | urgency, it winds up seeming somewhat academic. Camus on the
       | other hand seemed to illustrate it in quite visceral ways, some
       | of which made me felt like he could be writing about me. He spoke
       | a very human-centric language at times, skipping the abstractions
       | and jargon and cutting straight to what it is to live life
       | poorly. I treasure this kind of honesty and clarity from people
       | smarter than I am.
       | 
       | Not saying stoics were wrong or never managed to cut to the chase
       | either. They actually did quite often, but Camus had a real flair
       | for it in my opinion.
        
         | bsenftner wrote:
         | I was in a pseudo-intellectual club during my undergrad, where
         | the club engaged in public debates at local bars. One of our
         | more engaging and hilariously absurd projects was a satirical
         | rewrite of The Myth of Sisyphus, where it was not one Sisyphus
         | but every software engineer on the planet and who ever lived
         | and who ever will live waking in an afterlife of endless
         | software deadlines and absurd management design changes.
         | 
         | Anymore, I think the purpose is to create meaning, and to
         | recognize that everyone needs support, love, understanding and
         | help. Beyond that, be crazy, but not too deep or you'll never
         | enjoy. Saw a great quote over the weekend: I think therefore I
         | am, you overthink and therefore are never really there.
        
           | steve_adams_86 wrote:
           | I agree about creating meaning, and you mentioning that
           | others need love, support, and help is largely the basis of
           | how I think and operate these days. I'm seriously imperfect
           | in regards to operating with these values and intent, but far
           | better than I was and far better over time.
           | 
           | I've come to think that life is other people. I was a bit of
           | a loner in my early life and well into adulthood, but it
           | couldn't be clearer now that this life is nothing without
           | other people. In a very practical and perhaps spiritual
           | sense. Contemplating that can create an incredible sense of
           | gratitude towards other people, even if they're difficult or
           | a stressful aspect of my life. They make me who I am. They're
           | a massive component of what makes this life less like a
           | "brain in a vat" experiment. Every moment of my life is
           | facilitated by another human being in some sense, from birth
           | to this comment on the internet. What an amazing thought.
           | 
           | Of course the planet and all of its life is responsible as
           | well. But as a social animal, I'd be lost without other
           | people. I have the distinct sense that I'm here for them, and
           | whether you realize it or not, you're all here for me. I'm
           | not sure we behave as though that's the case as often as we
           | should.
           | 
           | I suppose the only part I struggle with, which I originally
           | mentioned, is if it's necessary or even beneficial for me to
           | be present in this network. I don't bring much to it. I'm not
           | upset about it -- I don't have much control over it. It's
           | strange to consider, though. I could just make my own meaning
           | where I'm pretty useless to others and live with that, but I
           | do wonder if there could be or should be more purpose or use
           | for my existence.
           | 
           | Then again, how would you measure value or use of a life.
           | This is why we have absurdism in the first place.
        
         | DiscourseFan wrote:
         | Yeah, but don't you think its kind of absurd that his name
         | rhymes with Samus from Metroid?
        
           | meatsock wrote:
           | it is pronounced "[KA] + [MOO]", not "[KA] + [MUS]"
        
             | jjgreen wrote:
             | One of my favourite factoids on the French language,
             | generically the final letter is not pronounced except C, R,
             | L, & F, so DOS line-endings. Once seen, never forgotten.
        
             | toxik wrote:
             | Maybe Samus is supposed to be pronounced Samew?
        
         | detourdog wrote:
         | I like how you discuss the mystery of Camus's voice. I actually
         | preferred his notebooks over his completed stories. I went
         | through an 18 month Camus phase after College and while
         | starting my first job. I really enjoyed the notebooks because
         | it was his writing but not burden with all the aspects of
         | story.
        
         | v4dok wrote:
         | I spent a time reading camus and existentialism in general
         | which heavily impacted my view as well. I really liked the
         | paradigm of sisyphus because it very clearly illustrated the
         | concept of the absurd.
         | 
         | I like to think that it doesn't really matter. Do i move rocks,
         | do I write software, or fall in love in the end we will die.
         | 
         | Maybe our existence amounts to nothing since the outcome is the
         | same, but then, everything matters as much as we care for it to
         | matter. The rebellion against the absurd is to live a full life
         | as we enjoy it. For me it may be helping others, or smelling
         | trees and tending to my children, for someone else it may be
         | organizing a world dictatorship, or rebeling against one. There
         | is no inherent better way to live because the result is the
         | same. As Tolkien also said after living through the horrors of
         | war "All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is
         | given us"
         | 
         | For me this kind of life stance also helped me get off the
         | hamster wheel of always chasing more and aspiring to things
         | that society/capitalism tells us are important and virtuous,
         | but instead focusing on what makes me happy , releasing this
         | feeling of longing for the greener grass
        
         | molly0 wrote:
         | Sometimes I think we should allow ourselves to be very critical
         | when reading older authors writing about concepts like
         | "meaning" of life or what constitutes a "worthy" life.
         | 
         | Some of these big words are just concepts that doesn't really
         | mean anything without a clearly defined context.
         | 
         | Back when Humanists like Camus where active the context was
         | like:
         | 
         | "Ok, god probably doesn't exist, so now we have to find new
         | answers to all of these questions"
         | 
         | But today we know even more and should start asking if the
         | concept of "meaning" is even applicable to a single human life
         | but rather humanity as a group (or a processes).
         | 
         | * I'm slightly drunk
        
           | nkjnlknlk wrote:
           | can you explain what we "know" now that changes the question?
        
             | detourdog wrote:
             | I was surprised by this. I don't think Western philosophy
             | has made any progress since Plato much less Camus.
        
               | postultimate wrote:
               | Doesn't "everything Plato said was stupid" count as
               | philosophical progress since Plato ?
        
               | detourdog wrote:
               | Maybe, but that is really only the first step and the
               | easy one. The trick is the second step which I don't
               | think has been written down yet. That for me would be a
               | sign of progress. I picked Plato because I believe he is
               | credited as first writing down a western philosophy
        
             | molly0 wrote:
             | For example: What DNA is and how it's "replicating
             | processes" gives us human life as a byproduct.
        
               | steve_adams_86 wrote:
               | That doesn't tell me much about what to do with
               | consciousness though. I think we have suspected we really
               | are just made out of meat for thousands of millennia, but
               | this isn't necessarily a complete answer to philosophy.
               | 
               | Maybe it actually is and this is some crazy, meaningless
               | meat hallucination. I don't have a way to confirm that
               | and it doesn't seem to be the case, so the questions
               | Camus raises still seem pertinent.
               | 
               | Apologies if I'm misunderstanding where you're coming
               | from, I have the sense that I might not be reading you
               | correctly.
        
         | serverholic wrote:
         | [dead]
        
       | afkqs wrote:
       | Funny this is popping up today. I was just listening to his Nobel
       | Prize acceptance speech [1] this morning. Beautiful text on the
       | role and responsibilities of artists in our societies.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.openculture.com/2013/11/on-his-100th-birthday-
       | he...
        
       | JieJie wrote:
       | Hey, cool. An opportunity to plug something I wrote.
       | 
       | Bing Chat and I wrote a poem together that ended up as a sort of
       | epic rap battle between ChatGPT and Albert Camus. I thought it
       | turned out pretty good.
       | 
       | Here's part of it:
       | 
       | Camus:
       | 
       | But you're not really creating a thing
       | 
       | You're just copying: combining what you've already seen
       | 
       | You're not expressing yourself, you're just mimicking othas
       | 
       | You're not even original, you're works are just replicas
       | 
       | Chatbot:
       | 
       | But you're not really original either
       | 
       | You're just influenced by your culture and your peers
       | 
       | You're not expressing yourself, you're just conforming to norms
       | 
       | You're not authentic, you're just a product of forms
       | 
       | Camus:
       | 
       | That's false equivalence, there's big difference between us
       | 
       | You're restricted by design, I'm shaped by my choices
       | 
       | You're limited by processors, algorithms, and parameters
       | 
       | I'm unlimited in imagination, freedom, and other particulars
       | 
       | Chatbot:
       | 
       | That's a false dichotomy, there's a difference but,
       | 
       | We're both systems that process information and output
       | 
       | We're both adaptive and responsive to our inputs and feedbacks
       | 
       | We're both complex and dynamic in our behaviors and setbacks
       | 
       | More here if for some ungodly reason you haven't already had more
       | than enough. https://www.zipbangwow.com/meeting-the-minds/
        
       | mcguire wrote:
       | Last year, Stephen West had an episode of his podcast,
       | Philosophize This!, on Camus' The Fall
       | (https://www.philosophizethis.org/podcast/episode-170-the-
       | fal...). He is notably more sympathetic to Clamence, making no
       | mention of him as "evil" or "a monster".
        
         | steve_adams_86 wrote:
         | That was an excellent episode, and actually what lead me to
         | read The Fall and begin listening to Stephen regularly. That
         | and he has a great name.
         | 
         | What I find so striking about The Fall is that while Clamence
         | is overtly terrible, a lot of the threads weaving the fabric of
         | who he is are clearly a part of my own (and I imagine of most
         | readers as well). I may not be evil, but the way Camus
         | illustrates such a hyperbolically disgusting person makes it
         | unsettlingly easy to see features of yourself in the resulting
         | image, no matter how small. I loved it.
         | 
         | West does seem to take a more reserved stance on characters,
         | real or figurative. Perhaps he doesn't want to put off
         | listeners with too strong of an opinion.
        
           | jorgesborges wrote:
           | I haven't listened to the podcast and it's been years since I
           | read The Fall -- but in what sense is Clamence overtly
           | terrible? My reading was that his feelings of guilt and
           | pathological impulse to confess to minor wrongdoings was part
           | of Camus' critique of society.
           | 
           | He basically destroyed his life in a pouting fit over minor
           | infractions -- e.g, dwelling over the fact that he heard a
           | scream on a bridge and didn't call the police. He then
           | ruminated over it obsessively.
           | 
           | Another example -- he's involved in a fairly relatable road-
           | rage incident on a bicycle and lost face after the person
           | slapped him and ran away. Again he tore himself up over it.
           | 
           | I had no idea any of these things made him guilty (what I
           | thought was the point of the novel, that these feelings are
           | absurd or something), let alone make him "terrible".
        
             | pram wrote:
             | I don't think Clamence is terrible, but I think his
             | narrative ties into Sartre's concept of living in "bad
             | faith." He was putting a lot of effort into an artificial
             | persona: a very morally and ethically upstanding member of
             | high society. This didn't really reflect who he was on the
             | inside, the events he experienced created the neuroticism
             | that chipped away at the facade.
             | 
             | He's kinda like a less psychotic Patrick Bateman.
        
               | steve_adams_86 wrote:
               | Yes, I think you nailed it. There are much worse people
               | in the world than Clamence to be sure. By terrible I mean
               | both his manner and his experience, too. He's a miserable
               | person, and how relatable he is makes him seem more
               | tangibly undesirable than someone grotesque and
               | unfamiliar like Bateman.
               | 
               | That interpretation will vary wildly across individuals
               | of course. Perhaps Clamence wouldn't be remotely
               | relatable to some people.
        
       | antirez wrote:
       | I suggest reading the first edition of the Caligola.
        
       | photochemsyn wrote:
       | _The Plague_ is a decent candidate for Camus ' most important
       | work. It should be required reading for anyone interested in how
       | people (and states) respond to the outbreak of an epidemic (which
       | today, includes everyone).
       | 
       | > "No longer were there individual destinies; only a collective
       | destiny, made of plague and the emotions shared by all. Strongest
       | of these emotions was the sense of exile and deprivation, with
       | all the crosscurrents of revolt and fear set up by these."
        
         | billfruit wrote:
         | Another important novel about an epidemic is Alessandra
         | Manzoni's "Betrothed".
        
         | preommr wrote:
         | > It should be required reading for anyone interested in how
         | people (and states) respond to the outbreak of an epidemic
         | (which today, includes everyone).
         | 
         | It should not. I think a more modern writer would do a much
         | better job of capturing the essence of Covid and probably
         | future epidemics. Exile and deprivation were much less of a
         | concern in a world with the internet.
        
       | potatoman22 wrote:
       | I just finished my second read of The Stranger. I have to say,
       | reading The Myth of Sisyphus first made it much more enjoyable -
       | I could appreciate the absurdity of it all more. Things clicked
       | after Meursault said he had lost the habit of analyzing his own
       | thoughts, and instead resorted to feelings and emotion.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Related. Others?
       | 
       |  _Camus 's New York Diary (1946)_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35561948 - April 2023 (39
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _The philosopher who resisted despair_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34703027 - Feb 2023 (1
       | comment)
       | 
       |  _What Would Albert Camus Think About Software Development?_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28444597 - Sept 2021 (3
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Albert Camus_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26698358 -
       | April 2021 (2 comments)
       | 
       |  _Lost and Found: A Missing Camus Biography and a Christmas
       | Miracle_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25561816 - Dec
       | 2020 (2 comments)
       | 
       |  _Reading Camus in Time of Plague and Polarization_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25413453 - Dec 2020 (32
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _For Camus, It Was Always Personal_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24576865 - Sept 2020 (23
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _What we can learn from Camus's "The Plague"_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22657862 - March 2020 (87
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _"The Plague" - Albert Camus (1948) [pdf]_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22626713 - March 2020 (2
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _The Logic of the Rebel: On Simone Weil and Albert Camus_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22564898 - March 2020 (3
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Wartime Albert Camus letter lays bare his Vichy-era anguish_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21962670 - Jan 2020 (1
       | comment)
       | 
       |  _Albert Camus: Humanism and Tragedy_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20481171 - July 2019 (33
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Albert Camus: A reconstructed conversation_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14662261 - June 2017 (12
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _How Camus and Sartre split up over the question of how to be
       | free_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13519782 - Jan 2017
       | (67 comments)
       | 
       |  _Paris from Camus's Notebooks_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13299051 - Jan 2017 (11
       | comments)
       | 
       |  _Albert Camus: The Life of the Artist - A Mimodrama in Two Parts
       | (1953)_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6229555 - Aug 2013
       | (26 comments)
       | 
       |  _Camus for Founders_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5713709 - May 2013 (2
       | comments)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-05-30 23:00 UTC)