[HN Gopher] Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020) ___________________________________________________________________ Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020) Author : areoform Score : 176 points Date : 2023-06-01 18:23 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (daily.jstor.org) (TXT) w3m dump (daily.jstor.org) | shams93 wrote: | As someone who blew 500k on an MFA I wish they would bring this | back lmfao. | samstave wrote: | Please expand on this backstory? | nerpderp82 wrote: | I worked with shams93, their medium was Papier-mache using | 100$ bills. | [deleted] | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | 500k?? Did your tuition include cocaine? | pessimizer wrote: | Journalism school is $250K and only lasts 2 years. You have | to filter out the plebs. | ftxbro wrote: | your personal information about to get added to the creepy | backrooms of algolia https://news.ycombinator.com/highlights | isoprophlex wrote: | What the hell am I looking at?! I never knew this existed! | What else don't i know? | [deleted] | [deleted] | groby_b wrote: | You took 8+ years to get an MFA? | moomoo11 wrote: | Nothing to see here folks. Just Matrix things. | underlipton wrote: | Speaking out of my ass: my understanding was that certain | branches of abstract expressionism were so, essentially, but it's | difficult to apply the suspicion to ALL of modern/postmodern art, | considering that so much of it was developed or influenced by | artistic movements outside the temporal and geographic purview of | the CIA (particularly pre-WWII European (post)modern art and its | influences in Asian and African forms). Also, it wouldn't be the | first time influential entities boosted controversial media in a | successful bid for a sort of cultural engineering. (I know what | you're probably thinking, and no, I'm actually referring to, | "Woodrow Wilson screening 'Birth of a Nation' at the White | House.") | | (I'm purposely conflating modern and postmodern art because I | imagine that many who see the term "modern art" make that | mistake, and because Pollock et al. kind of bridge the two in | eschewing representation while still using traditional media.) | arthurcolle wrote: | It's pretty funny this article was published on April 1st | elif wrote: | seems like a genius way to legitimately funnel dark funding. | | you can literally invent million dollar excuses for value | transfers to arbitrary individuals. | DANmode wrote: | See also: art in embassies program | luxuryballs wrote: | Yep there's a whole industry around this too, you can watch | these high end art auctions live where all the people in the | room "bidding" are just representing the real bidders by proxy. | It can get dark pretty quickly though if you start imagining | what may actually be buying. | secondcoming wrote: | This is the case for pretty much all auctions though. Not | everyone has the ability to be physically present in the | auction room. | AdmiralAsshat wrote: | Wait, you mean that scene in Men In Black 3 wasn't a joke? | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MbvNXZL5f0 | [deleted] | eql5 wrote: | yes | pessimizer wrote: | This went along with tons of money to left-wing | anticommunist/antisoviet writers and scholars (financing a bunch | of elite literary journals that no one read, but looked good | enough on resumes to get people into the NYRB, Guardian, etc..) | If you're on the left, but not a Leninist, don't fall for the | flattery of institutions. There are people spending the integrity | of naive idealists in order to advance military and strategic | goals. | rr808 wrote: | If you haven't read about MKUltra its worth a read too. Looks | like the CIA helped to make LSD popular in the 60s | https://www.npr.org/2019/09/09/758989641/the-cias-secret-que... | adamrezich wrote: | still not sure if it was related but in elementary school in | the 90s I was put in a "gifted" program which involved, on at | least one occasion, wearing headphones in a dimly-lit room and | being tested with Zener cards. I've dug into local records and | still to this day don't conclusively know what that was all | about. | throw74775 wrote: | > I've dug into local records and still to this day don't | conclusively know what that was all about. | | Do you have episodes of unexplainable lost-time? Maybe try | setting up a surveillance camera at home so you can see when | they activate you. | willismichael wrote: | There's no way that would work. Any security camera that | you can set up is already back-doored. | smegger001 wrote: | only if its networked. | saalweachter wrote: | I've always wanted to pull out some Zener cards in the middle | of a programming interview. | | If a candidate is psychic, wouldn't that be good to know? | meindnoch wrote: | Actually... It can be a good trait for a candidate to call | out obvious bullshit - for which a Zener-test is the | perfect meta-test! | saalweachter wrote: | It also gives candidates a good story even if they don't | get hired. | the_sleaze9 wrote: | Amateur level. | | You need to testing for Larges, not Mediums. | tomcam wrote: | Same. I'd forgotten about it. For me this happened around | 1970. | nemo1618 wrote: | I've seen these programs discussed on 4chan and reddit -- try | "GATE conspiracy" | adamrezich wrote: | I've seen those threads too, years after I made the | connection myself (by playing The World Ends With You and | seeing the Zener card symbols on the top screen, before I | knew what they were). | | some of the things listed there apply to my experience, and | others don't. the whole thing leaves me with more questions | than answers. | meindnoch wrote: | That was the first test. Those who responded went on to the | next level, which is goat staring. | Spooky23 wrote: | Were you in NYC by chance? | adamrezich wrote: | nope--SD. but the phenomenon has been reported all over the | country, as I've come to find out. | varelse wrote: | [dead] | MilStdJunkie wrote: | Something the post-Boomer generations have been talking about | more and more: the fact that the "tune in, turn on" movement | wasn't coming from inside the house, so to speak. The old | leftists still get very defensive of their drug overuse, in | spite of the fact that their "counterculture" had set back | effective policy by generations. They had ceded the field to | reactionaries and identitarians (both allies of capital, of | course), the effects of which we're dealing with to this day. | | The American security state - Pinkerton, etc - was created to | deal with labor, and it was nearly-constantly trying to end-run | around democratic oversight using whatever means it could: | poisoning students with military-grade chemicals, allying with | Luciano, squamming loins with notorious non-state actors | (including actual Nazis), hiring _squadrons_ of prostitutes, | and on occasion - maybe, possibly - making some US citizens go | away more permanently. Without even mentioning its adventures | in the Americas at large. It 's the height of schadenfreude | we're living through a golden age of conspiracism without | eyeballs on the horribly, horribly real historical | conspiracies, who was behind them, and who continues to be. | diydsp wrote: | > squamming loins | | ?!?! I looked it up, but there are too many definitions... | https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Squam Is that | a synonym for "knocking boots" ?! | diablerouge wrote: | My guess is that OP did indeed mean "knocking boots" as a | reference to Operation Paperclip, where the US government | granted amnesty to a bunch of Nazi scientists in return for | pivoting their research to US national security purposes. | | edit: source | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip | jasonfarnon wrote: | when I was growing up "knocking boots" meant have sex? | (there was a whole rap song with that title). Which is | what I assumed "squamming loins" was some british english | version of. | noah_buddy wrote: | It's a metaphor in the same sense as "strange | bedfellows." | MilStdJunkie wrote: | Whoops. I had thought it to be merely some unfortunate | onomatopoeia. It's awesome that the word has so many actual | meanings, if informal ones. But yes, "a thing involving | 'mutual loins' that sounds like 'squam'" | swayvil wrote: | And now everybody's on antidepressants. | | Yes yes, it's a good thing according to good medical | authority. But still, it's crassly dystopian too. Maybe we | can thank "old leftist drug overuse" for normalizing us over | that hump. | kagevf wrote: | > "tune in, turn on" | | "Turn on, tune in, drop out" | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn_on,_tune_in,_drop_out | | Just noting this because I wasn't sure if this what was being | referenced, so I looked it up . . . | heystefan wrote: | I don't know a lot about Pinkertons, is there a good book or | a documentary to find out more? | | (Or any other "real conspiracies" for that matter.) | lazide wrote: | The Wikipedia article is a decent read [https://en.wikipedi | a.org/wiki/Pinkerton_(detective_agency)] | BashiBazouk wrote: | That was well covered in Tom Wolfe's _The Electric Kool-Aid | Acid Test_. At least the "make LSD popular" part. | Lammy wrote: | Now do Rock music https://www.amazon.com/Weird-Scenes-Inside- | Canyon-Laurel/dp/... | bluefishinit wrote: | This is a great place to start: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident | | tldr: Jim Morrison's dad started the Vietnam War when he | falsely claimed he was attacked off the coast of Vietnam by the | North Vietnamese. | intalentive wrote: | Now do feminism | | https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/feminist-was-spy | readyplayernull wrote: | And The X-Files was a long ad. | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKTFfT4sMhQ | | > There's this guy from the CIA and he's creeping around Laurel | Canyon | underlipton wrote: | Makes me look at things like Disco Demolition Night in a new | light. | 082349872349872 wrote: | What makes me suspicious is that disco never "died" in europe | in the same way it did in the States... | | (up until recently, covers of "I Will Survive" --one of | which, sadly no longer available on YouTube, was even in | drag-- were featured annually in russian state-channel | [Rossiia1] New Year's programming) | GoofballJones wrote: | Disco didn't die in the states at all. It kept on going. As | a mainstream genre, maybe, for a while. But it evolved into | the various house and techno and the myriad of sub-genres | that are still flourishing to this day. | mikrl wrote: | That event always seemed so weird to me. I'm not the biggest | fan of disco (some of the old and new stuff is danceable) but | isn't blowing up a crate of records similar in spirit to book | burning? | underlipton wrote: | Or, if you consider recorded art - its creator's thoughts | and feelings being shuttled into the future - as akin to | that creator living on in perpetuity, perhaps it's also | similar in spirit to the assassination of a "subversive." | | Wait a minute. | dfxm12 wrote: | The spirit was the thing was that: 1. explosions are fun, | 2. this rock jock hated disco, 3. his fans and other people | will pay money to go to a baseball game and see this at a | time when not many people were going. It was more of a | publicity stunt, than anything politically charged. | | Something in the spirit of book burning today is more like | banning books in public places, like schools or libraries, | under penalty of prison. | heavyset_go wrote: | This is one of my favorite rabbit holes to go down, it's nuts. | Fervicus wrote: | Now do news media: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_Cooper#Early_career | debacle wrote: | What? | quakeguy wrote: | The book the OP links to does make a good case of the same | influence being used by the CIA as the OOP link makes with | modern art... if that makes sense. | thinkingemote wrote: | We can see what our governments are encouraging towards other | countries quite easily and openly today. For example in the UK | you can see organisations like the British Council (The United | Kingdom's international organisation for cultural relations and | educational opportunities): | https://www.britishcouncil.org/arts/news | | and towards China in particular: | https://chinanow.britishcouncil.cn/ | | Some on the left (and right I imagine) say these are an example | of neo-colonialist neo-liberalist ideas and that does seem as | conspiracyish as this article but if you imagine in 50 years time | a politics article looking at the arts right now, then an | archived series of these projects from our governments | international arts organisations might well be included! | api wrote: | The government threw money at the arts in the mid-20th-century to | show up the USSR and people are reading too much into it. If | classicism had been the thing in the middle of the 20th century | they would have funded that instead. | | Is the popularity of reactive programming a Facebook psy-op? They | certainly popularized it via React, but does that mean there was | some deep agenda inside Facebook to popularize reactive | programming to accomplish some mysterious occult goal? Or was it | just that Facebook is big, happened to employ some good devs who | liked reactive programming, and dumped a lot of money into it? | | When big companies and governments throw money around they | distort the market and whatever happens to be in the right place | at the right time to grab that cash tends to get favored. That's | usually all there is to it unless you can find concrete evidence | that (for example) someone with authority in the CIA wanted to | promote _that specific type of art_ to achieve a specific | societal outcome. | ak_111 wrote: | The React analogy doesn't work, React is used because | developers find it more productive to use. On the other hand | people's initial reaction to much modern art is "what the hell? | you call this art?" so it is interesting to explore why it | became very expensive and popular with elites despite the | popular reaction. | | Put another way, react would have probably gained a huge | following without FB's marketing (imagine if it was just a few | hackers launching it as an open source project). Can we say | that much modern art would have gained much fame if it wasn't | for certain critics promoting them or if they gained favourable | attention from elites? | groby_b wrote: | > On the other hand people's initial reaction to much modern | art is "what the hell? you call this art?" | | There's a lot of people who look at React and think "What the | hell? You call this useable?" as well. The point of spending | money on popularizing something is usually to popularize it | with a specific crowd. | | And if you are close to the art crowd, modern art is a) a | stupid moniker, because it covers 1860-now, and b) a pretty | logical evolution of what was before. You don't have to like | it to understand what it's trying to do. The "what the hell" | crowd is not the crowd targeted by the marketing. | emodendroket wrote: | I don't think it is much to do with some nefarious plan to | defeat social realism so much as they funded talented artists | and talented artists happened to be bored with old forms/find | them irrelevant and they wanted to experiment with something | new. | TheOtherHobbes wrote: | They funded splashy but tame talented artists with no | political leanings, and destroyed or starved artists who | were more overtly political. | | There was a lot more happening in art than AbEx. But only | AbEx received official approval as an acceptable political | metaphor for bold individualism. | | Approval included canonisation by museums and galleries and | think pieces by art critics. | | https://www.artforum.com/print/197406/abstract- | expressionism... | jimbob45 wrote: | And also HTMX, Angular, or Vue could take over and erase | React tomorrow and no one here would be especially surprised. | __MatrixMan__ wrote: | It's not a mysterious occult goal. The web is now broken with | JavaScript disabled, and Facebook has cemented a place in your | browser to run their tracking code. It's pretty hard to believe | that that was an intended consequence. | hnuser847 wrote: | React was released back in 2012/2013. The web was already | broken without JavaScript back then, and had been for quite | some time. Remember jQuery? And FB placing tracking codes in | cookies has nothing to do with React. | gjsman-1000 wrote: | > The government threw money at the arts in the mid-20th- | century to show up the USSR and people are reading too much | into it. If classicism had been the thing in the middle of the | 20th century they would have funded that instead. | | I'm not so sure. Call it a conspiracy theory, but there is at | least some evidence that modern art is a fantastic tool for | money laundering. Now, this is also true of classical art and | patents, but imagine if you are trying to send money with a | stupid cover story. Make a piece of modern art in 15 minutes, | have other person send $50,000 to "purchase" it... | krapp wrote: | I don't think the CIA needs to clandestinely fund an entire | art movement as a cover for money laundering, though. That | seems a bit outlandish. | | I'm as paranoid as the next guy but in this case I think the | premise that the CIA funded artistic expression as a form of | propaganda in its own right makes the most sense. | briantakita wrote: | > I don't think the CIA needs to clandestinely fund an | entire art movement as a cover for money laundering, | though. That seems a bit outlandish. | | Besides...the CIA makes more money running illegal drugs. | api wrote: | Any high priced asset that's easy to move with few questions | asked is a great tool for money laundering. One of the | largest tools is real estate, which may be one reason you see | a lot of unoccupied houses and condos in certain expensive | cities. | | The art doesn't have to be modern to work this way. It just | has to be fungible art with an inflated price tag on it. Any | style will do. | | Other popular money laundering vehicles include: | "investments" in totally hollow shell companies, fake | customers to shell or cutout businesses (like the car wash in | Breaking Bad), manipulating penny stocks (you basically run a | pump and dump against yourself using dirty money to pump and | extracting clean money on the other side), cryptocurrency and | related things, other big assets like airplanes and boats, | etc. | reillyse wrote: | Real estate is traditionally quite difficult to move, | that's actually one of its core selling points. | neilv wrote: | Like NFTs, it could be money laundering, pumping, or both? | jvanderbot wrote: | Is this where I put Betteridge's law? | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline... | . | | Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any | headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the | word no." It is named after Ian Betteridge, a British | technology journalist who wrote about it in 2009, although the | principle is much older. | | "If the headline asks a question, try answering 'no'. Is This | the True Face of Britain's Young? (Sensible reader: No.) Have | We Found the Cure for AIDS? (No; or you wouldn't have put the | question mark in.) Does This Map Provide the Key for Peace? | (Probably not.) A headline with a question mark at the end | means, in the vast majority of cases, that the story is | tendentious or over-sold. It is often a scare story, or an | attempt to elevate some run-of-the-mill piece of reporting into | a national controversy and, preferably, a national panic. To a | busy journalist hunting for real information a question mark | means 'don't bother reading this bit'." | tonymillion wrote: | I came into the comments thinking about Betteridges law and | hoping to see it near the top and I wasn't disappointed. | | Pretty much any article posted to HN with a "?" At the end | that's not a AskHN prefix should get that response. | samstave wrote: | ASK HN: Should I post an ephemeral of ideas as platitude | questions to ASK HN? | pookha wrote: | Government wasn't just throwing money at art...Could be the | other way around. Back then what was stopping the CIA from | covertly laundering money through art? They've cleaned money | with worse. | tgv wrote: | It's not just that modern art started well before the CIA | existed, but the article also conveniently forgets to mention | how modern art subverted communism. | | It even can't explain how "Jackson Pollock's gestural style | [...] drew an effective counterpoint to Nazi [...] oppression," | because by the time Pollock got anywhere near famous, WWII was | over. Perhaps that sentence doesn't even mean anything. It's | just fancy words, because a counterpoint is not an opposition, | but a harmonically fitting independent voice. Style over | substance, as usual. | jasonfarnon wrote: | If it is generally agreed that soviets, fascists, nazis used | modern art to pursue their ends (new objectivity etc) I find | it implausible that US intelligence wouldn't respond in kind. | Of course that doesn't mean that the manner of response | detailed by this article is accurate. | emodendroket wrote: | The conspiratorial view is that people were numbed by | meaningless abstract art when they could have been engaging | with didactic social realist works that would have convinced | them to become communist. Hard to falsify but I'm not sure | how credible it is. | itronitron wrote: | The fact that you're calling it reactive programming, instead | of MVC, shows that Facebook's psyop was at least partially | successful. | lmm wrote: | WTF? It's very different from MVC. | ralusek wrote: | I refuse to believe that Alegria/Corporate Memphis/Globohomo art | isn't a psyop to demoralize populations with how hideous it is. | lmm wrote: | Even if we knew it was, would anything change? People have | built their careers on this stuff. Ten or twenty years ago I | laughed at some things that are now just mainstream and normal | - people do this stuff, they hire other people who do this | stuff, one day you wake up and it's industry best practice and | you have to fall in line. | | When I first watched the movie Cube I thought the idea that | people would build a deathtrap and then put people in it | because they thought the incomprehensible bureaucracy they | worked for wanted that was ludicrous. Now I realise that's the | real horror of the film. | PaulHoule wrote: | Back in the days of the John Birch Society people made the same | claim except it was the KGB instead. | JasonFruit wrote: | They could have been unwittingly cooperating with each other. | yoyopa wrote: | modern art began well before the CIA | AdamH12113 wrote: | There's a book on this called The Cultural Cold War[1]. I tried | reading it but (embarrassingly) I don't know enough about | artistic and literary figures in the mid-20th century to follow | along with all the names it drops. Seemed interesting, though. | | [1] https://thenewpress.com/books/cultural-cold-war | TheOtherHobbes wrote: | Also | | https://www.amazon.com/Who-Paid-Piper-Cultural-Cold/dp/18620... | | by the same author. Makes it very clear that both sides were | despotic in their own ways. The USSR used brute force and | intimidation. The methods used in the US were more subtle and | covert, but just as ideologically - as opposed to creatively - | directed. | diimdeep wrote: | Hollywood? Most recent one | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_(2023_film) | ackbar03 wrote: | So Andy wharhol shot jfk? | klyrs wrote: | Worse... Duchamp was a shill for Eljer Co. | tpm wrote: | Modern Art was not a CIA Psy-Op, because modern art is older than | the CIA. Modern art started around the 1870s and was in full | swing at the start of the 20th century. The CIA was founded in | 1947. | BurningFrog wrote: | A theory I like is that "modern art" was triggered by | photography making a lot of painters unemployed around the | 1870s. | | So some unemployed painters tried their luck painting pictures | a camera couldn't make. | BeFlatXIII wrote: | I wonder what this generation's modern art response to AI art | will be. | pessimizer wrote: | Nobody is accusing them of coming up with the styles. They just | found the emptiest artistic movements with the least to say and | flooded them with money and positive criticism. | DubiousPusher wrote: | I know they are trying to create a catchy headline but just to be | 100% clear, Modernism as a movement predates the existence of the | CIA by > 50 years. Modernism in music, literature, art and | architecture appears around the end of the 19th century and the | beginning of the 20th. It went through many iterations by the mid | 20th century and the birth of the CIA out of the wartime OSS in | 1947. | [deleted] | pfffr wrote: | My thoughts, too, went to Luigi Russolo and early experimental | electronic music, and experimental films of the 1920s. | Obviously any counterculture can still be co-opted into the | mainstream. See what is happening now with various civil rights | movements being worked into corporate images (and the ensuing | conservative backlash). | | What happens when Adorno & Horkheimer become mainstream pop | icons? | intalentive wrote: | 22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms | of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to | "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, | substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms." | | 23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan | is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art." | | From 45 Communist Goals, published 1958 in "The Naked Communist" | and read into the Congressional Record in 1963. Worth checking | out, much of it came to pass. | | https://www.lib.usm.edu/legacy/spcol/exhibitions/anti-comm/a... | nonethewiser wrote: | 32. "Support any socialist movement to give centralized control | over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, | welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc." | alephnerd wrote: | It was published by the "Patriotic American Youth" - the youth | wing of the precursor of the John Birch Society and affiliated | with the (white) Citizens Council Movement, which was formed | following Brown v Board of Education. | | https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/white-citize... | | https://www.lib.usm.edu/legacy/spcol/exhibitions/anti-comm/a... | | https://mississippiencyclopedia.org/entries/patriotic-americ... | | https://usmspecialcollections.omeka.net/exhibits/show/antico... | intalentive wrote: | Yeah, it's fascinating how frequently the paranoid wingnuts | of the past turned out to be right. Then you have people like | Aldous Huxley and things like the Jaffe memo, painting | basically the same picture but from an "inside" perspective. | alephnerd wrote: | These wingnuts you mentioned weren't democrats or | republicans - they supported George Wallace and his | "American Independent Party". | | I for one like having the ability to vote without paying a | poll tax or taking a poll exam and drinking from any damn | water fountain I wish, which are rights Segregationist | White Supremacist orgs like PAY, the John Birch Society, | and the Citizen Councils wanted only for White Protestant | Anglo-Saxon Americans. | | The fact you were able to pull up a primary document | published by a movement from an era that is largely not | taught in depth about is honestly very suspect, unless you | are studying for a BA in American History, which I honestly | doubt. | intalentive wrote: | That they were horrible people is irrelevant to the | question: were they right about the "Communist goals"? | That so many of the items in this list came to pass, | either completely or in part, is prima facie evidence for | 1) the existence of long term social planning in the | West, or 2) the ability of the Birchers to correctly | extrapolate from current trends to future events. | krapp wrote: | I mean, this isn't a list of "communist goals," this is a | list of what is claimed, by American right-wingers and | the American government during a time of vehement anti- | communist sentiment - to be "communist goals," but it | reads like a right-wing American screed. The first two | items imply opposition to atomic war is a communist plot. | It quotes without sources. It makes claims that it | doesn't back up. | | I see no particular reason to take this at face value. | 082349872349872 wrote: | The Birchers (and fellow travellers) were, according to | _Dr. Strangelove_ , also convinced that water | fluoridation is a commie plot, so -\\_(tsu)_/-? | carlosjobim wrote: | Your comment seriously gives an impression of having been | written by the CIA. | | >They weren't democrats or republicans | | You know, if you think the whole world is either | republican or democrat and anything not coming from those | affiliations is suspect, then you have limited your world | view pretty drastically. | | > The fact you were able to pull up a primary document | published by a movement from an era that is largely not | taught in depth about is honestly very suspect, unless | you are studying for a BA in American History, which I | honestly doubt. | | This as well. You're on a "hacker" forum, it is nothing | unusual that people here are interested in fringe topics | and find interesting sources outside the mainstream. | Trying to pry into the identity of another poster to | determine if he or she has the right to say certain | things is beyond creepy. Have you considered a career at | the CIA or other equivalent? From your comment you seem | like a good fit. | nonethewiser wrote: | It's a summary of an FBI agent's report "Naked Communism". | I'm thankful they were motivated to amplify the FBI's | findings because the goals are heinous. And if we all agree | the goals are heinous then I don't see anything left to | contend with. If we can't agree they are heinous then I guess | the communist agenda is alive and well. | hospitalJail wrote: | As much as our government interferes with other countries, | makes you wonder how often our country is interfered. | the_third_wave wrote: | Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet informant and KGB operative who | defected to the United States in the early 70s who has some | choice words to say on this subject, words which turned out | to be more than prophetic. It is worth watching the whole | interview, about 1 hour 20 minutes in which he laid out the | four stages of ideological subversion" created by radical | Marxists to indoctrinate and weaken nations from within. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yErKTVdETpw | hansjorg wrote: | That the provenance proudly includes "read into the | Congressional Record" (Wikipedia also mentions this) is almost | all you need to know about this. | | The rest can be gleaned from the Wikipedia page on the author: | | > W. Cleon Skousen ... was an American conservative author with | the John Birch Society and a faith-based conspiracy theorist | FrustratedMonky wrote: | Was this then a Conspiracy to discredit another Conspiracy? | intalentive wrote: | The predictive power of the Birchers suggests they were onto | something. | ddalex wrote: | Wow. Check out no: 2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in | preference to engage in atomic war. | | I guess they had no clue how the American Psyche works. Japan | sinks 6 vessels, U.S. drops the sun on Japan. Not once, but | twice, for good measure. You'd think Russia would watch and | learn. They haven't learned anything, even today. | onetokeoverthe wrote: | [dead] | throwaway1777 wrote: | Was modern art a KGB psy-op covered up by the CIA? | wly_cdgr wrote: | No | hkt wrote: | Regardless of what you think of this, there is a related idea | worth considering: hegemony. Whether it is organic or confected, | the idea that powerful groups within societies create and export | ideas to other groups in society in a way that cements their own | power or breaks a competing group's.. isn't new, and is fairly | clearly the case whether we look at art, or tech, or media | ownership. | thatcat wrote: | Brad Troemel covered this pretty well on patreon, here's the | preview https://www.instagram.com/p/CVfvbpwAoMZ/ | dang wrote: | Discussed (a bit) at the time (of the article): | | _Was Modern Art Really a CIA Psy-Op?_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23525366 - June 2020 (7 | comments) | | Pretty sure there have been other threads, including on the Peter | Matthiessen (Paris Review) connection - anybody want to find | them? | | Edit: there's this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10963429 | - and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10964477 linking to | https://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/exclusive_the_paris_review_.... | | Edit 2 - found some more: | | _During Cold War, CIA used 'Doctor Zhivago' as a tool to | undermine Soviet Union_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7991903 - July 2014 (30 | comments) | | _Abstract Expressionism was (in part) a covert CIA operation_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1891222 - Nov 2010 (1 | comment) | | Others? | justsomehnguy wrote: | ^ this guy moderates | | Did you ever posted how exactly do you find a similar posts | despite them having a very different URIs? | dang wrote: | Yup - lots of links here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35668525 | [deleted] | irthomasthomas wrote: | I'm genuinely surprised that the article neglected to mention the | intriguing story of Rockefeller Plaza and the artist Diego | Rivera. | | Rockefeller, in his ambition to elevate the visual allure of the | lobby in the newly-constructed Rockefeller Center, enlisted | Rivera to produce an imposing mural. The outcome was "Man At The | Crossroads," an artwork of monumental scale and significance. | | Rivera's work is a meticulous tapestry, deftly weaving myriad | aspects of the social and scientific zeitgeist of his era. Echoes | of Communism, an influence in Rivera's other works, can also be | discerned here. The centerpiece of the composition features a | worker, seemingly the master of the machinery surrounding him. | This focal figure is presented beneath a colossal fist clutching | an orb, a representation of atomic recombination and cellular | division in an ongoing act of biological and chemical genesis. | | Four propeller-like forms extend from the central figure towards | the composition's corners, signifying light arcs emanating from | large lenses that anchor the spatial edges. Rivera coined these | as "elongated ellipses". They encapsulate cosmological and | biological forces, such as erupting suns and cellular structures, | symbolizing the revelations afforded by the telescope and the | microscope. | | Interwoven between these arcs are vignettes of contemporary | social life. To the left, affluent society women are depicted | indulging in cards and cigarettes. In stark contrast, on the | right, we find Lenin amidst a diverse assembly of workers. | Juxtaposed scenes of militaristic force and a Russian May Day | rally laden with red flags encapsulate Rivera's contrasting | societal visions - a decadent, jobless society, dispassionately | observing escalating conflict, and Lenin ushering in a socialist | utopia. | | Classical statues tower behind the observers at the edges of the | scene. The left bears an enraged Jupiter, his hand clutching a | thunderbolt, severed by a lightning strike - an embodiment of the | frontier of ethical evolution. Conversely, a headless seated | Caesar on the right signifies the frontier of material | development. These images were Rivera's symbolic defiance against | superstition, advocating for the scientific mastery of nature and | the overthrow of authoritarianism by the emancipated proletariat. | | The mural's overt Communist themes caused a stir among certain | American observers. When Rivera stood his ground against removing | Lenin's depiction, Rockefeller retaliated by having the mural | plastered over. Erased. | | In the subsequent years, Rockefellers skill at erasing art made | him a key figure in the CIA's initiative to suppress intellectual | discourse within the art world. In pursuit of this endeavor, the | agency orchestrated the flooding of galleries with abstract art, | featuring indecipherable splashes of paint, thereby drowning out | the voices of artists who dared to infuse their creations with | thought-provoking messages | | https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_at_the_Crossroads | exogen wrote: | If you like this kind of question, I highly recommend the Wind of | Change podcast, about whether The Scorpions song of the same name | was written by the CIA. Super entertaining! | | https://crooked.com/podcast-series/wind-of-change/ | esafak wrote: | If would be so cool if it is true! Well, is it? | 082349872349872 wrote: | In Linebarger's book _Psychological Warfare_ , he points out | that asking propaganda men (in his defense, they probably | were almost all men ca. 1947, and I suspect he may even have | referred to specific men, eg Edward Bernays) about their work | is highly unlikely to result in an unspun answer. | | (then again, consider Epimenides: Linebarger is also a | propaganda man) | aethanol wrote: | guess you'll have to listen! | jasonfarnon wrote: | I feel about this the way I feel about most so called | conspiracy theories. I'm certain intelligence agencies are | involved something _similar_ to this. It would be really | surprising if they didn 't avail themselves of this huge means | of influence. They spend all day wondering about how to | influence. But I'm more skeptical that the conspiracy theorist | actually managed to catch the intelligence agency's activity in | this particular case. | tedunangst wrote: | This is basically every sports fan theory that every game is | rigged on the basis of a few point shaving scandals. | oblak wrote: | Every game is probably exaggerated but I've watched enough | sports as a kid. Even back then it was clear to me that | big, especially international, events are highly | orchestrated. Yes, including outcomes. | | I've been watching F1 for several decades and some key | races are jazzed up to the point that one must actively | suspend their disbelief. Not to mention Bernie Ecclestone | straight up saying who's going to be champion and who isn't | ever going to be one. It's all fake, dude. Unless you | really believe some countries are | thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat much better at sports (and | everything else) because they're just that awesome in every | respect. | smallnix wrote: | I think you got the analogy wrong. It's rather that | probably some games are actually rigged but the fans are | not complaining about exactly these. | 99_00 wrote: | Patronage, fine art, and propaganda have always been intertwined. | It is so fundamental to the subject that it's in the textbooks. | This article could be pulled from the course text for intro to | modern art. | tootie wrote: | That's a wildly overstated headline. Modern art goes back to the | early 19th century and there were artists and patrons across the | world long before the CIA. It's entirely plausible that they saw | the rise of modern art as a useful vehicle to propagandize but | it's ridiculous to say the entire thing was an OP. | cookieperson wrote: | This. Sure all three letter agencies need avenues to shuffle | large somes of grey and black market cash around, art is | convenient for that... Music and movies too. An extra plus for | hiding messaging and all that... But I wouldn't view these | operators to be as all encompassing as stories like these make | them out to be... The next step is crap like "Leonardo da Vinci | was actually a cia spy recruited by the freemasons", and once | you go that far you're one cardboard sign and a roll of tinfoil | away from an institution. | badrabbit wrote: | People who spend money because they have to have a hard time | understanding people who spend money because they're bored. | seydor wrote: | Do not be fooled by the article's date. It is another psyop | moffkalast wrote: | Ignore this guy's comment, it's obviously a psyop as well. | RajT88 wrote: | You're both wrong. I am here for the psyop. | | Shit. Strike that from the record. How do you delete | comments? | quakeguy wrote: | You cannot delete anything once on the net, that was a | psyop. | gmiller123456 wrote: | You mean a psypo. | jp42 wrote: | I cannot confirm or deny whether this comment is psy-op. | RajT88 wrote: | No no, that claim was also a psyop. | | Unless the psyop was itself a psyop? Would they do that | to their own people? | krapp wrote: | It's psyops all the way down. | brudgers wrote: | The article mentions the Advancing American Art program. You can | read more about it here: | https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/hcm/7/1/article-p971_... | chasd00 wrote: | heh if this was true imagine the poor agents tasked with carrying | it out, god what an awful job. "you want me to do what?!? I | thought i was going to be behind enemy lines with a tiny camera | at a fancy party like in the movies.." | andirk wrote: | Or selling weapons to rebels to try to topple Socialist leaning | countries in hopes of being able to then bogart their resources | for private profit. Or yeah tiny spy cam in a tux. | GauntletWizard wrote: | * * * | golergka wrote: | Occams razor: a much simpler explanation, not disproved by | anything in this article, would be that CIA saw that sincere and | powerful american and western art was already capturing hearts | and minds for effectively, and decided to empower it, since this | process aligned with its goals. | | And in general, american hegemony roughly aligned with interests | of humanity as a whole, because with all it's downfalls and | atrocities and ugliness, its still much better than the | alternative. | jayzoos wrote: | [flagged] | pessimizer wrote: | More an explanation that requires one to be simple than a | simple explanation. | jayzoos wrote: | > everyone else's imperialism is bad except mine! | | lmao you flagged me for this? | ftxbro wrote: | > "Soviet propaganda asserted that the United States was a | "culturally barren" capitalist wasteland." | | but we invented taco tuesday and family guy | samstave wrote: | And then we empowered companies to sue eachother over the | phrase "taco Tuesdays" | | https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/taco-tuesday-trademark-t... | ch4s3 wrote: | Don't forget Huey Lewis and the News, when Sports came out in | '83, I think they really came into their own, commercially and | artistically. | toomanyrichies wrote: | Agreed. The whole album has a clear, crisp sound, and a new | sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the | songs a big boost. He's been compared to Elvis Costello, but | I think Huey has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humor. | rgbgraph wrote: | In '87, Huey released "Fore!", their most accomplished | album. I think their undisputed masterpiece is "Hip To Be | Square": a song so catchy, most people probably don't | listen to the lyrics; but they should, because it's not | just about the pleasures of conformity and the importance | of trends -- it's also a personal statement about the band | itself. | pessimizer wrote: | Yes! On _Huey Lewis and the News_ they seemed a little too | willing to cash in on the late seventies /early eighties | taste for New Wave, and the album - though it's still a | smashing debut - seems a little too stark, too punk. | ch4s3 wrote: | Their early work was a little too new wave for my taste. | chrisco255 wrote: | And Back to the Future, arguably the greatest movie/trilogy | of all time and a distinctly American epic, which also | featured several Huey Lewis and the News songs. | ch4s3 wrote: | I never saw it, I was to busy playing tennis and dining at | Dorsia. | chrisco255 wrote: | I never saw American Psycho. | mkoubaa wrote: | Boy am I glad that we are saying "was" now about that nonsense | jimsimmons wrote: | You think Van Gogh and Picasso are nonsense? | | Or even Mondrian | dboreham wrote: | Mondrian rules! In my youth I tiled the bathroom in my house | in a Mondrian pattern. Mostly white, lowering the cost since | white tiles were much cheaper than red yellow and blue. | DirectorKrennic wrote: | Yes and no. On one hand, my social class and upbringing | almost command that I should find beauty in Van Gogh and | Picasso's works. I defer to the masters on matters I do not | understand, but it's not where my personal taste and love | really lie. | emodendroket wrote: | I actually love experimental and avant garde works but one | problem is it feels like a lot of it is a bit of a dead | end. Like 4'33" was an interesting idea once but there's | kind of nowhere you can take that. Once you get past the | first presentation it's not interesting to do a slight | variation. Or, you know, Jackson Pollack, neat, but not | like I need to see 10 more guys flinging paint at a canvas. | ethanbond wrote: | Have you seen Picassos or (especially) Van Goghs in person? | omnicognate wrote: | What does Van Gogh have to do with the article? He lived | in the wrong century. | ethanbond wrote: | I am unsure why he was brought up in this thread tbh, but | it was many comments above mine | toolz wrote: | I have. I do a lot of traveling and inevitably people | want to go to art installations and museums and I'm | always fine with going. Anways, there's not a lot of | legendary art pieces (that are in public places) I | haven't seen in person. Not a single one of them really | inspire me. I'd go so far as to say I don't really | understand how art became such a huge market to begin | with. I literally wouldn't pay $100 for anything other | than sculptures. | | I wouldn't put most of the legendary pieces on my wall | unless you paid me. | | edit: it always tickles me the negative reactions I get | when people hear my opinion on art. Doesn't seem to | matter how I phrase it, it's always offensive to someone | that I can't see the undeniable beauty in popular art. | Putting time and effort into something is a prerequisite | for me to be in awe, but it does not automatically | interest me. Many professional athletes put in far more | time and effort into their craft to play a decorative | game and I similarly don't care about their mastery of | their strictly decorative achievements. | ethanbond wrote: | Fascinating! Well I hope you wind up with your own ideal | number of pieces whether that be 0 or 1000 :) | toolz wrote: | I might already be there at 0, haha! I much prefer | decorating my spaces with plants over art. I certainly | wouldn't argue plants are objectively better than art, | but for me the beauty of even the most common pothos far | surpasses the majority of popular art. | ROTMetro wrote: | I don't get houseplants. Inside they look stark, | isolated, completely removed from their element. I love a | good garden and outdoor flowers but houseplants seem | ridiculous to me even excluding the ongoing maintenance | and the inability to just leave home for a few weeks | without having to setup someone to water. Why do I want | to be physically tied down by my home decor? Or have the | quality of my home decor dependant on the quality of my | green thumb skills? Give me a Dali on the wall any day | that invariably leads to a discussion on what a person | sees in the scene. | toolz wrote: | I also enjoy playing with tech, which automated watering | among other cool tech solutions to keeping up with indoor | plants is fun for me. Always fun to hear about differing | opinions and wonder about how we arrived at our opinions. | I can't imagine ever caring what anyone saw in a dali. | Having taken an elective art class in college I recall | feeling quite uncomfortable having to listen to people | who relished the opportunity to hear themselves speak on | a subject that has no wrong answers. | | Personally I have a hard time valuing questions that have | no wrong answer. Seems like a polite ritual at best and a | waste of time at worst. | pessimizer wrote: | Art is a financial instrument. The value of art is how | much a wealthy person will pay for it. | | That being said, there are lots of intense and pretty | drawings and paintings that obviously took a lot of skill | to create. No need to expect _inspiration_. A lot of the | language around "art" is a reflection of the self-regard | of the people who own it. | | > edit: it always tickles me the negative reactions I get | when people hear my opinion on art. | | People want to fit in, it's a survival skill. Public | negative opinions about Marvel movies will get you death | threats and accusations of trying to destroy companies | for the sake of other companies. | toolz wrote: | > People want to fit in, it's a survival skill. | | I think you're probably touching the root cause, but it | still stands to question how exactly people feel they're | more fitted by publicly disagreeing with an anonymous | person on the internet. I guess it's just a learned | action in meatspace that incidentally carries over to the | internet where it has no benefit and only detriment? | Human behavior is always interesting. | mkoubaa wrote: | I certainly do | pxc wrote: | Picasso was a communist and his art was representational. His | form of 'modernism' has nothing to do with the kind of actual | nonsense that the CIA wanted to push. | registeredcorn wrote: | Absolutely, without exception. | [deleted] | zquzra wrote: | Picasso painted Man in a Beret when he was 14 years old. His | art became "nonsense" because realism was boring for him. | lmm wrote: | Lots of programmers get bored of writing simple line-of- | business code and find ways to make it more interesting for | themselves. It doesn't generally lead to a better end result | though. | shrimpx wrote: | Modernism is ubiquitous. Likely your furniture, computers, | cars, and home architecture are heavily modernist unless you | explicitly seek out classical stuff. | | Modernism is obsessed with truth and optimization, evolving | toward an apex. Computing technology as a whole is modernist. | Apple hardware design is a glaring example of a modernist | pursuit (especially under Ive). | chrisco255 wrote: | Oh boy, any one that thinks their particular art style is | "truth" has an ego problem. | operatingthetan wrote: | You misunderstood what they said. "Modernism is obsessed | with truth and optimization" does not equal "modernism is | truth." They were also talking about it conceptually, not | as "their" preferred art. | krapp wrote: | And the most modernist form of art now is AI generated art. | Pure form and aesthetic, but no real meaning or intent, like | a face in a mirror, something shaped like human meaning but | utterly devoid of it, manufactured like so much else of our | reality. | | Which, ironically, makes it legitimately art. It's art | because it's _anti-art._ | shrimpx wrote: | That's cool. The Dadaists and some Surrealists were doing | stuff like that intentionally, trying to make art devoid of | an artist, or of intent. | | Also the beat poets, who were trying to write intent-free | stream of consciousness texts, kind of like a token- | prediction engine. :) | axioms_End wrote: | The contra to this nonsense was state-controlled and heavily | censored - as much as I like Polish school of poster, or | overall "tidyness" of communal spaces in post-communist areas, | it was (to say it mildly) stifling creativity. | ProjectArcturis wrote: | Here are three things that well connected Old Money types like: | collecting art, being on the boards of nonprofits, and serving in | high-level government positions. Not surprising that a | Rockefeller might do all three. | B1FF_PSUVM wrote: | Nowadays there's bitcoin/etc, so art/collectibles as value | store are taking it on the nose. | xtian wrote: | These are mere personal preferences. Any connection to a | broader agenda is a conspiracy theory. | unnouinceput wrote: | Was Modern Art a CIA Psy-Op? | | No, it's not. No more than other attempts, like assassinating | Castro (man, that one is really a laughing stock if you read that | one front to back) or their involvement in "war against drugs". | Maybe they start it but had absolutely no control where it was | going. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-01 23:00 UTC)