[HN Gopher] In vitro biological system of cultured brain cells h...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       In vitro biological system of cultured brain cells has learned to
       play Pong
        
       Author : areoform
       Score  : 62 points
       Date   : 2023-06-02 19:13 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
        
       | nawgz wrote:
       | Wish I could read this whole paper. DishBrain sounds absolutely
       | horrifying.
        
       | nsxwolf wrote:
       | We should stop doing things like this.
        
         | Idiot_in_Vain wrote:
         | That's what she said :)
        
         | w4ffl35 wrote:
         | Why?
        
         | idiotsecant wrote:
         | said every luddite for the last 10 thousand years.
        
           | spaceman_2020 wrote:
           | How many brain cells do you string together before the
           | DishBrain gets some semblance of sentience? How many before
           | it becomes conscious?
           | 
           | We don't know, of course. Perhaps consciousness isn't
           | possible without a live body. Or perhaps it takes just a few
           | hundred thousand neurons.
           | 
           | In the meantime, you run the risk of torturing a potentially
           | conscious entity for...what gain exactly?
        
           | ok_dad wrote:
           | I don't think the Luddite philosophy applies in this case, I
           | think OP may have been speaking about the morality or ethics
           | of growing a brain in a dish? Luddism is more about when the
           | capitalist class steals worker productivity gains for
           | themselves, and is a pretty valid philosophy for today, when
           | the capitalists are trying to replace thinking humans
           | wholesale with computer AI.
        
           | jjtheblunt wrote:
           | TIL what a luddite is: apparently they started in 1811 and
           | were named after Ned Ludd, a textile worker in England. So
           | what was the characteristic called in 1810?
        
             | pessimizer wrote:
             | According to who you're replying to, they're actually
             | 10,000 years old, and complain about scientific research,
             | rather than about being pushed out of their textile jobs by
             | machinery.
        
         | sharkjacobs wrote:
         | Stop experimenting on in vitro biological systems of cultured
         | brain cells? Why?
        
       | api wrote:
       | In Peter Watts' Rifters trilogy (a series of sci-fi novels) there
       | are large cultured masses of neurons used as a form of AI and
       | nicknamed "head cheese."
        
       | m3kw9 wrote:
       | We need this aws service, maybe call it "Real Brain". You train
       | it, except you cannot untrain it
        
       | frisco wrote:
       | Interestingly, this is not a new result; people have been doing
       | stuff like this since at least the 90s, most notably Steve Potter
       | at GA Tech and Tom DeMarse in Florida.[1][2] (I built a shitty
       | counterstrike aimbot using a cultured neural network in college
       | based on their papers.)
       | 
       | There was a lot of coverage back in 2004 when DeMarse hooked it
       | up to a flight simulator and claimed it was flying an F-22 [3]
       | (lol, but I don't blame him too much...)
       | 
       | The basic idea is that if you culture neurons on an electrode
       | array (not that hard) you can pick some electrodes to be "inputs"
       | and some to be "outputs" and then when you stimulate both ends
       | the cells wire together more or less according to Hebb's rule[4]
       | and can learn fairly complex nonlinear mappings.
       | 
       | On the other hand, these cultures have essentially no advantage
       | over digital computers and modern machine learning models. Once
       | you get through the initial cool factor, you realize it's a pain
       | to keep the culture perfectly sterile, fed, supplied with the
       | right gases, among many other practical problems, for a model
       | which is just much less powerful, introspectable, and debuggable
       | than is possible on digital computers.
       | 
       | [1] https://bpb-
       | us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.gatech.edu/dist/f/516/fi...
       | 
       | [2] https://potterlab.gatech.edu/labs/potter/animat/
       | 
       | [3] https://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/11/02/brain.dish/
       | 
       | [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebbian_theory
        
         | sroussey wrote:
         | We have lots of these cultures around for drug testing. I
         | wonder if the "brain" playing pong affects the tests in any
         | way.
        
         | api wrote:
         | What I always wonder about with these systems is how feedback
         | was delivered to the cultured neurons. How do we tell them
         | they're doing things correctly? Or is this some form of
         | unsupervised learning with them?
        
           | seydor wrote:
           | the original paper is available
           | https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(22)00806-6
           | 
           | They used a specific region of the electrode array to deliver
           | the "reward" signal which was a regular predictable pulse
           | pattern . An error was represented with unpredictable
           | activity
        
         | fnordpiglet wrote:
         | I was with you up to "once you get over the cool factor." It
         | seems impossible to get over how cool it is to have a minibrain
         | playing video games. Having one of those at home must really
         | impress the girls.
        
           | UniverseHacker wrote:
           | Moreover, if there are girls not impressed by this, you will
           | know, and have really dodged a bullet.
        
           | seydor wrote:
           | "played video games" is overstatement. There was a slight
           | increase in the performance with the particular setup that
           | they used. It was not as straightforward as it sounds. This
           | kind of science is still in its infancy
        
           | spaceman_2020 wrote:
           | "Meet my brother. He's adopted"
        
         | UniverseHacker wrote:
         | > The basic idea is that if you culture neurons on an electrode
         | array (not that hard) you can pick some electrodes to be
         | "inputs" and some to be "outputs" and then when you stimulate
         | both ends the cells wire together more or less according to
         | Hebb's rule[4] and can learn fairly complex nonlinear mappings.
         | 
         | This is fascinating, can you clarify it a bit? Do you
         | 'stimulate', e.g. apply electrical potential to both the inputs
         | and outputs to represent each instance of training data,
         | without any physical distinction between input and output at
         | that stage? And then if you apply the potential only the
         | inputs, you can then read predictions on the outputs?
        
       | 1-6 wrote:
       | It's fascinating how brain cells outside of its host can do
       | simple tricks like play pong. Perhaps these scientists need a new
       | marketing department because DishBrain isn't quite appetizing.
        
         | beebeepka wrote:
         | Maybe they can do more than play pong. Is "the host" something
         | more than machinery, a vehicle, to a big clump of brain cells?
         | Is there a soul? Or is it all an illusion
         | 
         | I've tried cow brain twice and it was delicious.
        
         | harveywi wrote:
         | DishBrain's elevator pitch: Neural networks meet fava beans and
         | a nice Chianti.
        
           | juliusgeo wrote:
           | Maybe they could rebrand to "Brainlent Green".
        
       | RobotToaster wrote:
       | Can it play doom?
        
       | bilsbie wrote:
       | Do they use gradient descent? Otherwise how do they train?
        
       | kanzure wrote:
       | The whole field of biological intelligence needs a ChatGPT
       | moment. There's at least four or five different companies running
       | around trying to do this with biological neurons, but
       | unfortunately pong just isn't a spectacular demo.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-06-02 23:00 UTC)