[HN Gopher] SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US as... ___________________________________________________________________ SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world Author : jb1991 Score : 90 points Date : 2023-06-06 20:49 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.cnbc.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.cnbc.com) | vkou wrote: | As the saying goes, this is good[1] for Bitcoin... As people are | buying it, presumably in order to be able to flee their Binance | positions. Nothing breeds confidence in the ecosystem like the | world's largest exchange getting its funds frozen. | | [1] When it'll drop in price, I'll be here to provide different | post-hoc justification for why that market swing happened. Tune | in tomorrow, as the SEC keeps unraveling this rat's nest. | BrandoElFollito wrote: | I may be missing something but where is the "world" in the | article? | detrites wrote: | > The freezing order only applies Binance's two U.S. holding | companies, not to the non-U.S. regulated international | exchange. | | Yeah. I guess that's it right there. o_O | unyttigfjelltol wrote: | It's a rabbit hole around the word "repatriate" in the article. | The U.S. subsidiary appears to have entrusted the funds to | _someone else_. The SEC apparently wants the U.S. subsidiary to | _repatriate_ those funds, the details of course being very | important. | thelastparadise wrote: | The quality of discourse at this stage of the thread (2 hours, 20 | comments) is incredibly disappointing. | | Hn usually has high quality discussions. What is it about crypto | that causes us to lose our minds? | USB5 wrote: | The same thing about housing that causes us to lose our minds. | Under capitalism, investments (risky and otherwise) are | commonly working people's only hope for a taste of freedom. If | you don't like it, you have a friend in me. | AISnakeOil wrote: | Not your keys, not your crypto. | adrr wrote: | Why crypto will never be mainstream. Be dependent on storing a | private key that can get lost or stolen. Need to store a hard | copy at a bank in a safety deposit box. Can't even trust the | hardware wallets you buy off Amazon since it could have been | returned with malware loaded. | [deleted] | EscapeFromNY wrote: | Not sure why this is downvoted. It's the official stated | position of the SEC. https://youtu.be/hmPpIjfC9DY?t=178 | wsatb wrote: | The statement cracks me up. Without these exchanges, crypto | would still be a small blip on the radar. It would continue | to be nothing but a hobby for techies, libertarians, and | techie libertarians, forever. | | If it's ever going to become more than a playground for scam | artists, the industry needs real leadership that doesn't just | brush every scam away with a meme. | mgbmtl wrote: | I think the position of the SEC is that these companies | should comply with the law. Which is what is said just a few | seconds later. And that's the problem with slogans: we lose | track of the wider issues. | sdfghswe wrote: | This is HN. Doesn't matter how correct you are - if you say | it in form of a meme you'll get downvoted. | mgbmtl wrote: | And comments tend to be the same ones over and over. It's | become like Reddit: the same reposts, with the same | comments. | EA-3167 wrote: | Once again the use-case for crypto turns out to be... large scale | criminality and fraud. | | Shocker. | labster wrote: | Crypto is also good as a form of market speculation and to make | gaming GPUs too expensive for gamers. Don't sell it short! | yieldcrv wrote: | "a" use case that is indistinguishable and unquantifiable from | use cases you respect | | which is a major difference from "the" use case | | and just a use case for that company, which in any other | industry we would talk about the company's behavior not the | entire asset class and industry, I find it disingenuous to have | that "use case" auto reply on any article that happens to be | about crypto but is really about a company | PeterisP wrote: | It's "the" use case because of the scale. There are all kinds | of niche use cases that constitute $0 billion of turnover, | and thus don't contest that fraud is _the_ use case. | EA-3167 wrote: | That was an "ok" argument maybe 5-8 years ago, now there's | too much evidence that no legitimate use case exists, and | every alleged one turns out to be a fraud or a get-rich-quick | scheme. | yieldcrv wrote: | everyone goes through a disillusionment phase with crypto | | from my perspective, there is simply a lack of coverage of | things that function without incident, which are very | numerous and solve frictions for a lot of people, whether | you're in the market for that or not | | like construction sites that showed "how many days since an | incident", because people only heard about the incidents | jvanderbot wrote: | Where are these mystical things that function because of | crypto that wouldn't function with regular money, and | which also are not fraud? | matheusmoreira wrote: | Privacy. Censorship resistance. Monero is a great | cryptocurrency. | [deleted] | SilasX wrote: | Also good for boastful HN comments about how you were sagely | above it all! | phoe-krk wrote: | Is ad personam a meaningful way of making HN responses, if | we're at it now? | nindalf wrote: | You sound bitter. Were you left holding the bag at some | point? Regardless, most of us didn't fall for this snake oil, | so don't lump us in with those who did. | ftxbro wrote: | [flagged] | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-06 23:00 UTC)