[HN Gopher] Reddit CEO doubles down on attack on Apollo develope... ___________________________________________________________________ Reddit CEO doubles down on attack on Apollo developer in drama- filled AMA Author : coloneltcb Score : 289 points Date : 2023-06-09 21:12 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (techcrunch.com) (TXT) w3m dump (techcrunch.com) | jchw wrote: | > ...calling out the developer, Christian Selig's, "behavior and | communications" as being "all over the place" and saying he | couldn't see Reddit working with the developer further. | | Yes, there's only one problem spez, aside from your track record, | we also have basically every other major API user voicing the | exact same concerns. Maybe the somewhat erratic communications | have something to do with breaking over a decade of trust and | giving only a few weeks notice. | | On another note, I definitely can't see myself working with or | using Reddit in any way in the future. | | Reddit is another notch. They got to where they were by building | goodwill. It was open source, the APIs were openly accessible, | they fought against censorship and they were relatively measured | in their moderation. Now? It's just another fucking ad company. | There's nothing left. | kstrauser wrote: | I was hoping that Spez would say something like "we're | reviewing our decisions based on feedback" or similar, but no. | The AMA clenched it for me, and I deleted the Apollo apps off | my phone and iPad in solidarity with Selig. | | It was fun, Reddit. Best of luck. I'm outta here. | mduggles wrote: | Reddit cannot go public. Its product is volunteer work by | moderators and users to produce value. There's no way to take | that work and guarantee its delivery on a quarterly cycle. | | This is all a ridiculous self-delusion that Reddit management has | engaged in that the platform is really the "value add". It's not. | Reddit has become the shorthand for cut through ML spam and | that's based on users constantly posting up to the minute | accurate data. There's almost no historical value to that data. | jwie wrote: | The time for Reddit to have gone public was with all that other | spac mania during the pandemic. | | These days pesky investors are going to demand things like, a | business model and a profit opportunity. | bitshiftfaced wrote: | > Its product is volunteer work by moderators and users to | produce value. | | The way the Reddit works, moderation is a free and limitless | resource. You will never run out of people volunteering for the | job. | BEEdwards wrote: | You will run out of the people doing it remotely well very | quickly though. | | The high quality modding of askhistory, anthropology and | other science sub reddits are provided by actual domain | experts working for free. You can find someone to replace | them, but the quality will plummet and the users will leave. | bitshiftfaced wrote: | You're assuming that the current mods are already doing it | "remotely well." There are no shortage of cases where | people have been banned from a subreddit for ridiculous | reasons, myself included (e.g. talking about studies that | support safe sleep practices for infants). When Ceddit | still worked, it was eye-opening to see how much shadow- | censorship was happening, and for the most petty reasons. | | The subreddits you mentioned are good examples where domain | knowledge is a very desirable trait in a mod. But by and | large, it's not necessary for a mod to have deep domain | knowledge in order to be able to enforce rules | consistently. There's a reason why it's called being a | "glorified internet janitor." | [deleted] | protastus wrote: | The Reddit board of directors should choose a CEO with better | judgement because this doesn't look good. | | While I am sad for the communities, I am excited at the | opportunity to short this stock if it ever goes public with | such poor leadership. | phpisthebest wrote: | This would assume that spez is not doing exactly what the | Board of directors want. | | I think is he, I think they think this will be better for the | long term, users will be upset for a little while, but will | not actually leave. | | He has already said 3rd party apps make up a small amount of | "traffic" and "90% fall in to the free plan" anyway. | | So they are betting this is a tempest in a tea pot... | | Sadly they are probably right because people are sheep and | creatures of habit, for me I am going to archive my data | before the 30th and purge all of my accounts. I personally am | done with reddit, but I am likely the minority | mrandish wrote: | They've probably tried recruiting a good CEO. The problem is | no one remotely competent wants the job. | drumhead wrote: | All they have to do is keep the ship afloat until it goes | public, once thats done they cash out with their | millions/billions and then to hell with the site. They'll | resign, get fired or whatever but they wont care because | they'll have their money by then. | riku_iki wrote: | somehow facebook made it through.. | mustacheemperor wrote: | It's going to be a fun thought experiment at the bar for years | now - how would _you_ have brought reddit to profitability | starting in Q1 2023? | | Maybe there was a way to lever that value for ML training - and | the constantly updated nature of the "training database" - into | a profit model unlike any other social media app. Not the kind | of innovation this team wanted to build, clearly. | hiccuphippo wrote: | I think a place like reddit should be a non-profit foundation | rather than a business. The Archive Of Our Own community was | able to do it, the reddit community can do it too. | bradleyjg wrote: | We had something like that. It was called USENET. With the | right reader and a decent ISP, it was great. | MichaelZuo wrote: | Usenet still exists though? | | Plus the vast vast majority of reddit content consists of | mindless nonsense, or even worse, so it's probably best | that USENET didn't continue growing in popularity. | B1FF_PSUVM wrote: | > mindless nonsense | | That's the vast majority of anything (aka Sturgeon's | Law). | | Soon to be "improved by AI". | phpisthebest wrote: | Yes Usenet is still around, it mainly for the downloading | "LinuxISO's(tm)" | rjh29 wrote: | It's not even profitable _now_ with all their monetization. | But their overhead is millions of $/year. There is precedent | for non-profit sites of that size but it won't be easy. | scythmic_waves wrote: | Honestly with the amount of charity fundraising that reddit | does, I bet they could pull it off. Just recently someone | accidentally gave $15k to charity and in response, a bunch | of users raised an additional $55k [1]. If they did | intentional, annual fundraising with clear goals I wouldn't | be surprised if reddit the non-profit organization could be | self-sustaining. | | But I'm just some guy on the internet who doesn't actually | know anything about non-profits. | | [1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/BestofRedditorUpdates/comment | s/1456... | jeffparsons wrote: | I'd feel a lot more comfortable giving my time to "the | community" under an arrangement like that, too. The fediverse | has its place, for sure, but I think a centralised platform | run by a non-profit has the best chance of unseating Reddit | in the short term. | | It could even connect to the fediverse, but with its own | moderation hierarchy etc. so it has its own culture and | doesn't _rely_ on the fediverse. | drumhead wrote: | Thats actually the best structure for reddit because of its | coopertive nature, and the difficulty of making money from it | without compromising its essential nature. | asah wrote: | are there lessons from Wikipedia ? | next_xibalba wrote: | This whole drama is very odd to me and feels like a (very) vocal | minority of users incorrectly extrapolating their preferences to | those of all Reddit users. | | Reddit owns its API. It has every right to price access however | they see fit. It is wild to think that will spend $10s of | millions to support 3rd party apps. Or to expect that they would | acquire third party apps. | | I predict Reddit will stick to their guns and that this entire | brouhaha will have little to no effect on Reddit's user and | engagement metrics over the medium term. | | If you're outraged and highly engaged with this controversy, do | you think its possible you're in a bubble? | predictabl3 wrote: | [flagged] | hatsunearu wrote: | I'm a moderator and poweruser on reddit and I have very mixed | feelings about this. | | I think the truth is somewhere between the middle--reddit does | genuinely not want to support 3rd party apps (shucks, but | that's fine), but powerusers/mods want to use third party apps | because the official one sucks ass and 3rd party apps want to, | well, survive. | | I think a compromise must be reached. | | Also spez is a horrible CEO and should probably step down. I | care more about reddit as a resource to me as an individual | than what his feelings are. | plandis wrote: | The part I'm outraged about is that the CEO of Reddit was | caught in a lie about how 3P app developer tried to "blackmail" | them and when said developer released the audio it's clear that | never happened and now Reddit is doubling down on dragging this | developers name through the mud still. | Philip-J-Fry wrote: | I just don't understand why the big app devs are so against | making their apps subscription based. The Apollo dev even said | they'd have to charge like $2.50pm for each user. Do it then? | If you lose users, you pay less for the API anyway. Maybe less | users means less income and less time to spend on the app, but | I'm pretty sure most Apollo users would be willing to subscribe | to it. | | It seems like all the 3rd party apps took this stance and are | now just giving up at the first hurdle instead of adapting | their business plan. Reddit's own site and app is so bad that | people are boycotting them over losing third party apps, and | third party app devs don't think they have any way of charging | for their apps? Like, are they even listening. | plandis wrote: | Reddit announced the pricing with 30 days for app developers | to start being charged. That's not a realistic timeline. | Philip-J-Fry wrote: | App developers can just close off their apps until they | implement the subscription. I literally can't understand | why the 30 days is an issue. Instead of inconveniencing | users for a few weeks while the changes are made, they're | inconveniencing users for a lifetime by discontinuing the | app. | TranquilMarmot wrote: | I think for a lot of people, they _want_ to see Reddit not as a | "company trying to be profitable" but more as "the de-facto | community message board on the internet" where everything is | free, open, and equitable. Shutting down third-party APIs makes | the site less open in a lot of ways, which is rubbing people | the wrong way. | | That being said, I do agree that they own the API and have | every right to charge for it. I am going to be very | disappointed that my preferred way of browsing Reddit is going | to stop working, since the official app is not a great | experience. | tigeroil wrote: | I don't know why but I really, really hoped he'd come into the | AMA with good intentions, or maybe even to announce that | actually, you know what, they've reconsidered and now they're | going to walk back some of the changes to the API pricing so as | not to affect average users. | | If only. | [deleted] | PartiallyTyped wrote: | For whatever reason I had similar hopes, just grasping at | straws not wanting to lose my addiction [1] ... Alas, I need to | let go. | | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36123342 | | In retrospect, there's a lot of irony in that comment, I had no | idea this was coming ... Thanks spez for ruining something I | liked, and saving me. | tracerbulletx wrote: | Communication from executives is just like communication from | politicians. It's designed to get the outcome they want, to | manipulate, to make the strategic commitments they want, avoid | those they don't, hide the things they don't want you to know | yet, play to 40 different audiences etc.. | | On one hand I get why they do that, on the other hand it's made | communicating with these people or believing them completely | impossible if you just want to know what they think or what their | plans are. | parasubvert wrote: | s/executives/humans/g | personjerry wrote: | Link to the AMA: | https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/145bram/addressing_... | | The funny part is all the top questions didn't get answered... | "Ask Me Anything but I won't answer it" | cactusplant7374 wrote: | He didn't answer many questions. I guess he gave up. | superkuh wrote: | >The response was surprising. Unlike most companies, which try to | soften their blows behind corporate PR speak, Huffman answered | rather plainly. | | I strongly disagree. The response is line with his past behavior | and notice that nowhere in it does spez response address the fact | that he was caught lying. That is exactly what corporate PR speak | is. Deflecting away from lies and guilt and refusing to answer | the question. He wants us to be mad the Apollo dev protected | himself by recording the conversation. | sillysaurusx wrote: | Spez's response is making me question the integrity of not | merely Reddit, but YC as a whole. | https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/145bram/addressing_... | | The whole point of YC was to imbue every founder with "do not | be evil" in their DNA. Otherwise, it's a cartel. | | This is pretty clear-cut case of Huffman not only trying to lie | publicly (for no apparent reason, no less!) but then further | trying to damage his reputation. | | I'm unreasonably upset about this, and should probably step | away from computers for a bit. I don't know if I'm getting old | and just feeling like "it's the end of an era," or what. But I | grew up in a 2008 that was unlike anything on display here. | | I thought someone would be on the phone with Huffman trying to | convince him that lying publicly about a developer is a bad | idea. But if they are, they're not getting the message through. | toomuchtodo wrote: | My impression of YC was that it was a way to convince a bunch | of kids in their 20s that they were the "chosen ones" with a | chance (albeit very small) to become fabulously wealthy along | with the power that follows, while making YC and follow on | VCs fabulously wealthy. Everyone and everything else is fuel | for those goals. | | http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html | tacticalturtle wrote: | People keep saying he was caught lying - to be honest, I don't | really see where where that happened. | | Reading the transcript of the conversation with the Apollo dev, | it was a fairly awkward exchange, and the Apollo dev was using | all these innuendos to imply that a monetary exchange would | avoid a negative outcome. | | I don't think we know who it was specifically at Reddit that | acknowledged the Apollo dev was not delivering a threat. The | transcript notably attributed that to a general "Reddit", not | the CEO. Do we even know that the CEO was on the call? Why | didn't the Apollo dev note who was speaking? | | Especially after the way he was acting on the call to try and | negotiate a cash payment, I don't entirely trust the Apollo | dev's telling of events. | SahAssar wrote: | A good "PR answer" does not raise concrete questions, it makes | all questions feel equally invalid. In this case /u/spez'es | answer did not calm or invalidate the questions. | Exuma wrote: | What would be a good PR answer to refute the audio recording, | out of curiosity? | SahAssar wrote: | "While we do understand the concerns of individual | developers we are moving forward with them as a community | on these changes. As for mentions of acquisitions or | valuations of future partnerships we consider those talks | private and unfinished until we have something to announce" | or some similar corporate bullshit. | | It's not an answer I would have liked, but it seems like it | would have been far more in character. | kemayo wrote: | Spitballing here, but for the interpreting-as-a-threat | thing he could double-down on the misunderstanding claim -- | it sounds like the CEO wasn't actually on that call, so he | can throw an unnamed underling under the bus for how it was | represented to him, and backpedal on the specific | accusation while trying to still convey the _vibe_ that he | thinks Apollo was being unreasonable. | Exuma wrote: | Interesting, thanks. I see now what you mean about | 'invalidating all statements' | | edit: maybe you are not OP, but I still see now. | jongjong wrote: | Something similar also happened to me with my previous | employer. After I quit, the founders tried to make it look like | I was blackmailing them. Shortly after, they were forced to | change their story (at least the one told to my ex-colleagues) | because my colleagues knew why I had wanted to quit since | months and they knew it didn't make any sense... Cringe. Anyway | in my case, they told one story to employees and a different | story to investors. Unfortunately, it's very easy for certain | founders to tell 3 different stories to 3 different sets of | people these days and the lies exist in parallel and never | reconcile for years due to divergent incentives and class | divides (and media filter bubbles). | walterbell wrote: | _> founders to tell 3 different stories to 3 different sets | of people these days and the lies exist in parallel and never | reconcile for years due to divergent incentives and class | divides (and media filter bubbles)_ | | The cost of automated detection of story arbitrage is also | falling, e.g. hypothetical StoryGPT analysis of testimony to | a blockchain (or paper) notary. | vkou wrote: | You're assuming that anyone cares about dishonesty. | walterbell wrote: | Investors have a financial incentive to care. | | Hedge funds have a financial incentive to uncover | deception or incongruent claims. | hutzlibu wrote: | "Unfortunately, it's very easy for certain founders to tell 3 | different stories to 3 different sets of people these days | and the lies exist in parallel and never reconcile for years | due to divergent incentives and class divides (and media | filter bubbles)." | | "These days" .. but was it better before? | | The ruling class literally spoke a different language | (aristocraties in europe french and the clerics latin). | | That made it even easier to seperate realities and not | accidently share insights to peasants what they are not | supposed to hear. | sshine wrote: | I think it's more likely that investors don't mind that the | CEO is a two-face liar if he can make the company profitable | up to an IPO. | | "Community" is such an intangible KPI. | bionhoward wrote: | What makes you say that Community is intangible? | chmod775 wrote: | An intangible key performance indicator is qualitative | rather than quantitative and can't be easily measured. | Community clearly falls under any common definition | you'll find. | | That said, I don't think _community_ could be considered | tangible in any context. | rebolek wrote: | He had eighteen years to make the company profitable. | djbusby wrote: | If anything, this shows the VALUE in recording conversations - | especially for weaker party. | | Would like to have one-party consent recording all over USA. | dotancohen wrote: | > especially for weaker party. | | How often do you see the weaker party's interests enshrined | in law? | jjoonathan wrote: | Also in devices -- both Android and iPhone have | consistently made it obnoxiously hard to record calls, | across many years and many security decisions. | nico wrote: | IANAL, this is not legal advice | | You can always take notes, write down things about the | conversation, you can even write down the whole conversation | without consent | | So essentially you can have a transcription of a | conversation, but not the audio recording (without consent) | eulers_secret wrote: | Depends on state, I live in a 1-party consent state. | | Thus, I record all my interviews so I can review them | later... and use them if I find a need to. | | Remember: _always_ assume you 're being recorded. | | Even if it's illegal the court of public option makes it's | own rulings, and even if you 'win' legally you could still | be ruined. | hutzlibu wrote: | It is better than nothing, but an actual recording would be | a way more solid proof. | Spooky23 wrote: | Not necessarily. With a recording you need to take the | good with the bad. Recordings can become toxic as you | can't get rid of them when the shit hits the fan. There | are people who record their entire working day on their | phones or Apple Watches and get themselves into | trouble... do you know that the guy in your conference | call was in Maryland? Did you say something dumb? You're | always going to run afoul of something in doing that. | | With contemporaneous notes, you control the editorial | aspects of it and have no legal risk in most situations. | If you know you are exposed to some sort of problem, | email yourself to make discovery easy. Otherwise, keep a | handwritten journal. | mustacheemperor wrote: | Also not a lawyer, but you should strive to document | "contemporaneous notes" as substitute for a recording. A | good way to do this is to document the conversation as soon | as it happened, with a clear timeline, and email it to | yourself. | hackermatic wrote: | And in many circumstances, email it to them! Say "These | are my notes of our meeting, please let me know if there | is anything that needs correcting." | evan_ wrote: | This is one of the most important things I've learned in | my career- after a meeting where any kind of requirements | are decided upon, just write up a synopsis and email it | to all parties and say "Here's what we decided, let me | know if I got anything wrong." | | 99 times out of 100 it's immediately forgotten but there | have been a few times when I've been _really really glad_ | to have a contemporaneous record of a meeting. | bo1024 wrote: | I wonder if an automated stenographer would be legal even | when recording isn't. (A device that listens to the | conversation and writes down the transcript automatically | without recording anything.) | LegitShady wrote: | it depends where you live. | that_guy_iain wrote: | > I strongly disagree. The response is line with his past | behavior and notice that nowhere in it does spez response | address the fact that he was caught lying. | | Was he though? In the audio it's clear he took it as a threat | straight away. He literally said so. And the threat he | understood was that the ApolloDev would create a fuss and make | a lot of noise. Which the ApolloDev went on to do. The | ApolloDev's response to Spez saying this was "I didn't think | you took that as a threat" while posting an audio of him taking | it as a threat. Then saying it's a blatant lie. While posting | audio of spez saying he's taking it as a threat and using | common language for moving past threats in business calls "I'll | hope that's not what you meant" which is always code for "I'm | going to pretend you didn't do that." You can say he was wrong | but I don't think you can say someone is lying for believing | something that is wrong. | bionhoward wrote: | Just throwing it out there: I love Reddit, but only via Apollo, | so when Apollo shuts down, I'll probably quit Reddit. What a dumb | move for Reddit to blow their best UI like this! | I_am_tiberius wrote: | Funny was that he seems to have gotten his responses from a | shared document with answers that his team prepared for him. At | one point he copied "A: ...", which users noticed so he removed | the "A:" afterwards. | mustacheemperor wrote: | To be fair to all parties, it doesn't seem unreasonable to have | the CEO workshopping answers in a shared document with other | team members and counsel during such an event. | | To also be fair to all parties, it seems unbelievable such | oversight would still result in him making the comments he did. | KennyBlanken wrote: | What'll really bake your noodle is that the question he was | answering was almost certainly a plant. Extremely common "town | hall" technique (see: the scandal where Clinton was fed "town | hall" questions in advance by the DNC chairwoman.) | | Any time you see an AMA run by a major corp or media property, | it's all just a dog and pony show. Listen to some interviews | the same person is giving media personalities and you'll see | the same topics and talking points. | dang wrote: | Ok, let's do this CPS style. Recent and related: | | _Addressing the community about changes to our API_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36261369 - June 2023 (320 | comments) | | _Archive your Reddit data before it 's too late_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36259930 - June 2023 (341 | comments) | | _Shreddit is a Python program to remove all your Reddit | comments_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36257981 - June | 2023 (221 comments) | | _Ask HN: Anyone else disinterested in Reddit API drama?_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36256545 - June 2023 (26 | comments) | | _Apollo Back end just made public_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36256167 - June 2023 (229 | comments) | | _Ask HN: You are given 100M to launch a new Reddit competitor_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36255767 - June 2023 (23 | comments) | | _ArchiveTeam has saved over 11.2B Reddit links_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36254172 - June 2023 (150 | comments) | | _Using unmodified third-party Reddit apps with a custom server_ | - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36252061 - June 2023 (20 | comments) | | _Power Delete Suite for Reddit_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36250785 - June 2023 (31 | comments) | | _Apollo will close down on June 30th_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36245435 - June 2023 (1568 | comments) | | More: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36251707 | stolen_biscuit wrote: | Such a shame, I've used reddit for over a decade and enjoyed it | for the most part. There's a lot of value in the communities and | discussions on reddit, but I think the writings on the wall for | this one. Hopefully someone can build something that captures the | reddit experience and pulls in the communities | predictabl3 wrote: | I removed Relay and blocked reddit on my computers. Capitalism is | one thing but Steve has shown himself to be void of _any_ | integrity. It 's very obvious that it will only get worse as they | ramp up for, and then after, the IPO. | infecto wrote: | I know this is repeated over and over but in the case of Reddit I | think it's pretty true. They should never have taken VC money. I | don't think technically they are doing anything that is very | tricky. They have surely innovated on their tech stack but even | the things they have tried to do seem pretty miserable. Their | media player is horrendous and while they do have scale problems, | I don't see much happening on the product side. They have not | done much to make admin's life easier. Beyond the new UI they got | years back, I am not sure what they have done to improve the | product. | | Maybe I have not paid close enough attention but Reddit feels | mostly the same since forever. | TranquilMarmot wrote: | It feels like there have been some desperate attempts at | monetization over the past few years, with their "Coins" that | you can use to "reward" comments/posts, NFTs, and paid avatar | personalization. I imagine not very many users buy these, and | they aren't really something that even a "whale" would end up | buying a lot of because they are largely useless and don't | enhance the experience of the site at all. | vvillena wrote: | Well, good luck trying to commoditize a mob. Reddit are not the | first one who try, but they will probably be the next to fail. | drewmol wrote: | Fwiw, if you get a call from a debt collector and would prefer | not to speak to them, tell them the call will be recorded and ask | for their permission. It's been some time since I've had this | happen but I've been 6 for 6 on them not giving permission and | the conversation ending. (Yes, even after I consented to them | recording the call) | brookst wrote: | Yep, been a long time, but as I recall they usually start by | saying "this call may be recorded". | | Back when I was young and poor in in debt collector land, | choosing to interpret that statement as permission to record | and responding "that's great, I'll record it as well" always | ended the conversation. | predictabl3 wrote: | When Capital One locked my card four times in a row in three | days, left me stranded while traveling (partially my fault | for not having a backup), and then didn't answer their | customer support line for 12+ hours, and then _lied_ about | all of it to me, I tried to record my calls with them. I 've | never heard someone get so freaked out and cagey on a phone | call in my life, and of course they hung up. Utterly | despicable, I'm glad I'm in a place now where I don't have to | even disclose. | hayst4ck wrote: | This is a selfish ask, but is anyone motivated enough to read | through the AMA answers and share a summary of the interesting | points? | stolen_biscuit wrote: | https://old.reddit.com/user/spez can read through his responses | here and check the context of the question, he hasn't answered | all that many | lemming wrote: | Not me, but someone was: | https://old.reddit.com/r/Save3rdPartyApps/comments/145bxmi/c... | zulban wrote: | ChatGPT can do it. Really. | skeaker wrote: | Felt so disappointed when I read that in the AMA thread. I guess | it's not unexpected, someone stupid enough to make such an | obvious lie would of course be stupid enough to also double down, | but it really does dispel any remaining droplets of hope that | their priorities could still be in some tiny way in the right | place. Here's to hoping their valuation drops like a rock. | commandar wrote: | The whole AMA felt like a really ill-advised idea when it was | announced given spez's track record of interacting with the | community. | | Somehow, it managed to be worse than I was expecting. I figured | there'd be non-answers; I wasn't expecting some of the | incredibly tone-deaf ones. | garbagecoder wrote: | If it wasn't for stuff like that I might disregard it as | another negotiation in the media, but yeah that's nuts. But at | the same time I think they're uncorking a lot of festering | resentment about other things that are wrong with the platform. | EscapeFromNY wrote: | Reddit's valuation has been tanking even before this drama. | | https://www.businessinsider.com/fidelity-marks-down-stripe-r... | | They're so eager to screw over their users, they couldn't even | wait until after the IPO payday to torpedo their own business | ren_engineer wrote: | that applies to basically every company, Stripe is mentioned in | the article you posted as well. Rising interest rates do that | to high growth companies, Reddit actually declined slightly | less than Stripe in comparison | DirectorKrennic wrote: | I wouldn't be surprised if Elon Musk bought Reddit at this | point. He would be capable of it. | vkou wrote: | Please don't give that man ideas. | KennyBlanken wrote: | I don't think he would; it's not anywhere near the echo | chamber Twitter was when he bought it. He had a huge army | of supporters cheering him driving the company into the | ground...Reddit in the last year or two has pretty | collectively come to despite the hell out of him and his | "fans." | | I can't remember the last time I saw an /r/all comment | thread where Musk was spoken of in anything approaching a | positive way. /r/programmerhumor absolutely eviscerated the | man almost several times a day, in threads that saw wide | visibility, where programmers explained to non-programmer | redditors just how dumb the stuff he was doing was. | RobotToaster wrote: | Aaron Swartz must be spinning in his grave. | kylec wrote: | He wasn't actually a co-founder though, his startup got merged | into Reddit and he was given the "co-founder" title, but my | understanding is that Reddit was created/co-founded by Steve | Huffman and Alexis Ohanian. | mattl wrote: | Correct but he also worked on reddit and wouldn't have | handled this situation anything like this. | emtel wrote: | This is correct, although its not unheard of for people who | join a team very early to be called "founders" even if they | aren't there from day 1. | karaterobot wrote: | At this point, I think he should back up his claim that Selig has | acted disingenuously by saying one thing in public and another in | private. I'm not sure it's legally defamatory, but it's | definitely a bad look for a nominal leader. The only example I'm | aware of him providing (the 'threat') was pretty soundly debunked | by the audio recording. Ignoring the merits of their individual | cases, Selig has been transparent, and so is capturing the public | sympathy, while Huffman looks like a sweaty Joseph McCarthy, | claiming to have a briefcase full of evidence he won't show | anybody. | kemayo wrote: | Selig's response to that private/public claim was "Please feel | free to give examples where I said something differently in | public versus what I said to you. I give you full permission." | He's doing very well at making Reddit look like a lying bully. | | Context (the article mentions spez's comment doubling-down, but | doesn't mention Selig's immediate reply): | https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/145bram/addressing_... | hachiroku wrote: | [dead] | gigel82 wrote: | So the AMA had 21,294 comments/questions and it included a total | of 14 comments from u/spez (some duped), and a total of 21 | comments from all the staff participating. LOL, why even bother | with a "Ask Me _Anything_ "? | TranquilMarmot wrote: | Hey, you can ask, doesn't mean you'll get an answer. I feel | like this AMA was just a way to let users vent their | frustrations and concentrate the vitriol in one space instead | of having it spill over throughout the entire app. | adoxyz wrote: | What's the point of doing an AMA if you're not going to answer | the most upvoted questions. | Exuma wrote: | Cause he was pasting answers haha | https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/145bram/addressing_... | adoxyz wrote: | Oh that's even worse. What a dumpster fire this has become. | mock-possum wrote: | Copy and pasting _and_ editing them after the fact when | called out on it god what a mess | 0x0000000 wrote: | Spez, editing comments? He would never. | AuthError wrote: | I think he was downvoted so hard that his answers are marked | hidden, you ll have to check his profile to see his replies | stolen_biscuit wrote: | You'd still be able to see that he's replied in the thread | though, it'll just be collapsed but still there | vdfs wrote: | 14 replies on a 20K comments post | mosen wrote: | His responses are getting downvoted - you should be able to see | them if you go to /u/spez | Doctor_Fegg wrote: | He's barely answered any questions. Just 14 at last count. It's | not much of an "Ask Me Anything" if you miss out the "And I'll | Respond" bit. | gcdhvx wrote: | Why does the Apollo guy see the API as his entitlement? Reddit | ain't a charity. Neither is HN. | MattGaiser wrote: | A lot of what makes Reddit work is charity on the part of mods, | devs, etc. | dmattia wrote: | "the Apollo guy" mentioned that they were willing to pay for | their API usage and were in multiple discussions on pricing | over a period of months with teams at Reddit. | | Imagine if you were willing to pay for API usage and asked a | company what the costs would be, and they gave a number that | was infeasible for you to the extent that it wasn't even | considerable, such as $1 million per user. Obviously you | wouldn't be able to pay that amount if you were making far less | money per user of your app, and would feel as the Apollo | creator does. | | If you can agree to that, then it seems like you just disagree | on what a reasonable cost for this service is, which is fine, | but I wouldn't call it entitlement. | | I agree that Reddit ain't a charity. And I agree that HN isn't | either. But I'd also add that Apollo isn't. | stale2002 wrote: | His company isn't a charity either though. If his strategy is | to cause massive PR damage to reddit, he's allowed to do that, | and its currently working. | sebzim4500 wrote: | I don't think he does? To be honest if someone continued to | spread lies about me even after I had released recordings | disproving them I would be more than a little upset. | 23B1 wrote: | What we're seeing here is exactly the sort of executive | immaturity/arrogance that gets SO MANY startups in trouble. | | Young men/aspiring founders: for the love of god understand that | your investors are NOT the whole picture when it comes to | leadership. You need to find yourself a graybeard/executive coach | and pay them out the ass to tell you about things like: | | - Rapport-building | | - Professional development | | - Values | | - Adaptability | | - Brand reputation/equity | | - Tone > message | | - Prioritization | | - Candor | | - Empathy | | - Ethics | | - Humility | | - Accepting feedback | | - Understanding second- and third-order effects | nemo44x wrote: | [flagged] | userbinator wrote: | "API pricing"? The absurdity of thinking that it's normal to be | needing to ask permission for and even paying to essentially | access a site with a different user-agent is what lead to this | situation in the first place. It may not have gotten to this | point had people almost all realised what was really happening to | the Internet when sites started offering "API access" and | rejected it. | | "third party app"? My browser is a "third party app". | | (Note: I am not actually a Reddit user --- I use the site read- | only.) | egberts1 wrote: | So, this spez CEO is worse than a politician. | | Obfuscate, redirect, and blame. | | We all know that he is caustic, and so should the future | shareholders. | janoc wrote: | Shareholders don't care, the shareholders are the VCs that are | now demanding profits and dividends for their initial | investment. Why do you think the sudden push for the | monetization of the API and the "lost opportunities"? | LegitShady wrote: | The only valuable things that reddit has are the free labour | of the mods and the eyeballs of their community. attacking | them seems counterproductive to making the website more | valuable. | plandis wrote: | Wasn't YC an early investor in Reddit? Pretty sure Steve and | Alexis were in one of the early batches, right? | spacemadness wrote: | It blows my mind to think it will have any shareholders. A fool | and their money. | slg wrote: | Why did Reddit even have an AMA for this? Everyone knew it would | turn out exactly like it did. The most difficult questions went | unanswered. The answers they did give were either just bland | corporate speak or actively detrimental, giving their critics | more ammunition including opening Reddit up to accusations of | libel. The whole ordeal seems to leave them in a worse position | than if they just never did the AMA. | toomuchtodo wrote: | To control the narrative. | Natsu wrote: | This isn't exactly the first drama from Spez... | | https://www.reddit.com/r/Drama/comments/5emsq3/reddit_reacts. | .. | dogleash wrote: | If they don't say anything, they're incommunicative. But if | talk and say effectively nothing, they might get egg on their | face for people watching. However they can convince people who | don't pay much attention that it's just a disagreement. | mustacheemperor wrote: | At this point my theories are | | 1) Ego and emotion are driving decisions at reddit | | or | | 2) Reddit's leadership has run the numbers and genuinely thinks | it will benefit their profitability plans if the users reacting | negatively to these changes all leave. This is well past the | point of just killing 3rd party apps because the API changes | alone would have accomplished that. | | "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately | explained by incompetence." What do you do when incompetence | would be unbelievable in scope and malice would be unbelievably | incompetent. | LegitShady wrote: | reddit receives hundreds of millions of dollars per year of | free moderating from their community. The community is the | only valuable thing in reddit. The website is worth nothing, | the eyeballs and free labour are everything. | | When the parts of their community with outsize influence | start talking about abandoning the site to somewhere else it | threatens both their hundreds of millions in free labour per | year, and also the future of their site. | | Reddit exists as it does today because Digg made a series of | bad decisions that led to mass movement away from Digg. The | same thing can happen to Reddit. | Semaphor wrote: | As has been mentioned a few times: When Digg fucked up, | reddit existed as a growing but small competitor. Reddit | has no such competitor. | fphhotchips wrote: | That may be true in the US but it's not everywhere, and | it certainly won't be for long. | | Anyway, for many, the competition is "nothing at all". I | will _never_ download the official Reddit app. It 's that | bad. The mobile experience is worse. I'll just find | something more productive to do with my time. | LegitShady wrote: | now that its clear there's a need for an alternative they | will show up. It's not that hard to spin up an old pre- | shittification version of reddit. | KennyBlanken wrote: | I'd go so far as to say the free moderation labor is the | _only_ thing worth anything. | | Acquiring users is relatively easy. Retention is hard. | chrsstrm wrote: | You're not wrong, but that's a very one-sided view. The | alternate outcome is that when the current mods abandon | ship there's likely going to be many more people waiting in | the wings to get their shot at modding their own sub. What | other service is a perfect substitute for Reddit? The | thought that most users will give up Reddit cold-turkey and | stay away permanently is a bit naive. Internet use can be | an addiction and addicts staying away under their own power | and no alternative is unlikely. Ultimately a vacuum will be | created, it will be filled with fresh bodies, and Reddit | will continue along after a short period of unrest and | uncertainty, with new mods running new subs. | | "The time to buy is when there's blood in the streets." | VWWHFSfQ wrote: | The reality is that the Reddit users that actually care about | this enough to show up and rage in the AMA are also the ones | that are almost completely unmonetizable. So I doubt there | was ever really any risk of major loss from this. | prox wrote: | A bit under the radar, but Twitch is having a similar moment | with new ad directives which would kill independent | streamers. It caused an upset in the community. Twitch | backtracks but the damage is already done. | KennyBlanken wrote: | Making wildly unpopular changes and then "rolling them | back" to something "more reasonable" is a very commonly | employed corporate management strategy for implementing | unpopular policy changes with both customers and employees. | | Want to drop PTO rates by 5%? Announce a 10% reduction, | ignore the furor for a few days, then the CEO publishes the | already-written "oops" letter and says that they listened | to feedback from employees, looked at the "books" and | decided they could compromise to 5%. Half the company | thinks he's a great leader for listening and pushing back | against the evil bitch running HR. If they wanted to just | make more money off API calls, they would have announced | the pricing, but then rolled it back part-way. | Unfortunately, the Apollo dev recording his conversations | with them, and their sheer incompetence/ego, seems to have | taken all that off the table and instead they're just | doubling down, which definitely does not work. | KerrAvon wrote: | Yeah, but the thing is, you've broken a lot of trust with | your employees once you pull shit like this. Places like | Apple and Google, who have been shitty in different ways | with their RTO plans, are never getting back that trust, | not fully. If they go full-blown cynical like this they'd | see really serious attrition in places they didn't want | it to happen, and no amount of stock would bring those | people back. | | I know it's not you personally; not trying to shoot the | messenger here. People need to understand that these | tactics are bad for the company in the long term. | adamckay wrote: | It's worthwhile pointing out his wasn't a genuine AMA - it was | a "ask me anything we have a pre-written answer for" [1]. It's | an obvious thing to do because the whole situation has been | received badly by the community, so you'd expect some | preparation of good answers to likely questions, but to copy | and paste blindly the pre-written answers from the PR team is | just pure laziness and a blatant disregard for the community | you've built. | | 1 - | https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/145bram/addressing_... | endisneigh wrote: | I don't even know why this guy bothered to explain. Just change | the api and be done with it | [deleted] | asmor wrote: | Can anyone explain the joke to me? Why would reddit cut Apollo a | $10M check? Is this just a cheeky "so you think my use of the API | provides me with $20M of value" comeback at the ridiculous API | pricing? It did, in part, sound like a "half serious" (as in | completely serious but with plausible deniability) attempt at | "give me money and I'll announce my completely unrelated | retirement and stop making a stink about this", which I'd agree | is a bad look. | 542458 wrote: | Even if it was a threat, I don't see why that's a problem. | Reddit is a multibillion dollar business. At that scale | businesses routinely threaten each other - I.e., "If you sue us | over patent A we will sue you over patents B, C, and D". Apollo | saying "If you move to kill my business I will deploy my | consumer goodwill against you" is a completely reasonable thing | to do. | asmor wrote: | But that's not exactly what happened here. I'm totally with | you on mobilizing your users to affect change, but this was | asking for hush money instead of enabling Apollo to continue | operating? | 542458 wrote: | "If you move to kill my business (instead of offering a | reasonable exit i.e., acquiring it) I will deploy my | consumer goodwill against you." | plandis wrote: | It wasn't asking for hush money. The developer was asking | to be acquired. It's clear from the audio this wasn't | intended to be hush money. | curiousgal wrote: | The joke is that the opportunity cost is NOT 20 millions. | Asking them to buy the app for 10 millions is supposed to | illustrate the point. Imagine we both have a phone an you try | to sell me yours for 20 million dollars, I would reply saying | well you can buy mine for 10 millions, hopefully that makes it | clear that your asking price is ridiculous. | BoxFour wrote: | The joke is a thinly-veiled retort, basically: | | > Reddit: Apollo costs us $20m a year | | > Apollo: Well that's a silly number that doesn't add up and | you're basically comparing me to a DDOS, if I'm just a botnet I | guess you can just pay me half that to shut the botnet down. | [deleted] | gaganyaan wrote: | I doubt it was about making a stink, it was likely along the | lines of "It's your site and your rules, I get that. You're | clearly trying to kill off 3rd party apps like mine even if you | won't admit it, so I'll make it easy for you and kill it off | myself for some compensation." | HL33tibCe7 wrote: | Reddit's current situation is an interesting case study in the | difference between running a sustainable, profitable business, | growing naturally, vs trying to grow unnaturally quickly and | trying to extract as much "value" as possible from the business | at the expense of long-term stability in a frankly sickening and | vampirish manner. It's something I see repeated again and again | in this industry. | djbusby wrote: | Those at the top of this play all still make off with life- | changing money. Who cares about business stability once you've | secured your personal wealth? | Havoc wrote: | >We'll continue to be profit-driven until profits arrive. | | It appears he has confused the reddit AMA for an IPO prep call. | | What a tone deaf farce... | | https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/145bram/comment/jnk... | djbusby wrote: | Wild they haven't made profit in so long. Who's running that | place. | slg wrote: | It is wild that a company that is nearly two decades old and | seemingly has never been profitable is doing an IPO. Who is | going to buy their stock? What would make someone think that | Reddit will suddenly turn things around in year 19 and actually | become profitable? | [deleted] | madeofpalk wrote: | "To be fair" (not that he needs it) the question (he answered, | out of 10 in the comment) was poor | | > How do you address the concerns of users who feel that Reddit | has become increasingly profit-driven and less focused on | community engagement? | | Reddit is a company. It's profit driven. I don't think that's | surprising or shameful. | hooverd wrote: | I think Reddit probably had a path to making a modest profit, | but investors don't want the 2x dog. Now they're probably | going to do the social media equivalent of selling the copper | wiring from the walls. | maximinus_thrax wrote: | > We'll continue to be profit-driven until profits arrive. | Unlike some of the 3P apps, we are not profitable. | | Full quote of a CEO stating that a bunch of independent | developers are able to make a good profit while the pre-IPO | company he's running is not. | | Can you short an IPO? Not sure how these financial shenanigans | work. | djbusby wrote: | Not really. And the options market doesn't open until weeks | after the IPO. | wvenable wrote: | Being profit-driven is a fine model for a business. However, it | doesn't make business sense to alienate developers and users in | service of that goal. | | Reddit has always struck me as a company with no creativity. | They have this huge diverse community and can't seem to find a | way to monetize it in any way other than the most basic | advertising model. | | They always seem to do things in conflict with the community | rather than in concert with them. | Havoc wrote: | > Being profit-driven is a fine model for a business. | | A fine business model but a bizarre damage control statement | kstrauser wrote: | Nearly all businesses are profit-driven. My wife owned a | medical practice, and while she chose the profession because | she wanted to help people, she built a company around it to | put food on our table. There's nothing wrong with that. | | But optimizing for short-term profit over long-term revenue | is just nuts. Apple didn't become a trillion dollar company | by focusing on maximizing profit above all else every single | quarter. | robryan wrote: | Maybe they need better ad tooling and promotion of it. | Probably big improvements to be made just in getting enough | ad inventory to show something remotely relevant to a user. | wvenable wrote: | Ads are Reddit are a notoriously poor investments compared | to other social media sites. Maybe it's an intractable | problem given the nature of the site or again maybe they | just aren't engaging enough with the communities to target | ads more specifically. | spondylosaurus wrote: | They also try to monetize the whole thing with Reddit Gold or | whatever where you can pay like five bucks to put a badge on | someone else's post or comment. | | Although I wouldn't know a whole lot about it because after a | decade-plus on Reddit I've still never bought any. | TranquilMarmot wrote: | This was such a confusing feature to me. I just looked and | my Reddit account is 13 years old, and I've also never | bought any of these "rewards" because they seem so empty | and useless. The person you're giving it to gets nothing | other than some images above their post, so I _know_ that | if I spend the money on one it's basically just a donation | to Reddit which I'm not keen to do if I get nothing out of | it. They also have their "premium" subscription which seems | even more useless. | | Now, if they had implemented it in a way similar to how | Brave did their rewards where people would get some share | of the reward (say, 5% of the money?) then I would be way | more likely to buy it and would probably also participate a | lot more. Imagine if some people could make a living off of | Reddit the same way they do off of YouTube or Twitch! | Semaphor wrote: | I still think it was a missed opportunity to not just give | API access for premium users only. | spacemadness wrote: | I'm probably overly cynical about this, but the only people | buying those seem to be fake accounts trying to prop up | their other fake accounts. | munificent wrote: | I pay for Reddit Gold. Reddit has brought a lot of value | to my life, I don't like seeing ads, and I like the idea | of supporting non-ad-based business models. | janoc wrote: | I have never bought them but I have actually received a | few silver and gold badges like that for some of my | comments. So I guess that makes my account a fake then? | hatsunearu wrote: | they used to give out reddit silver badge and other | badges for free if you used the official app. I used that | to give out a lot of badges to the community I moderate. | | Ironically all the badges are from memes that were born | on reddit... | spacemadness wrote: | Nope, it makes me overly cynical and expecting the worst | from Reddit. | gtop3 wrote: | > Reddit has always struck me as a company with no creativity | | I thought reddit was really clever for the first ~7 years of | operations. They replaced forums, fostered communities, | gained a reputation as a place to get real people's takes, | and attracted people willing to have interesting | conversations. The upvote/downvote system that is now so | common was made popular from reddit. They brought awareness | to important political topics surrounding net neutrality. | They were leaders in early Web2.0, where each user saw | content that appealed to them, because everyone could choose | which subreddits were in their homepage. It was highly social | and highly engaging. | | After a certain point in 201X the dark patterns began to | appear. I was almost fully disengaged by the start of 2013. I | can't remember the details, but I remember being increasing | disappointed with reddit every time I returned for a brief | visit. | wvenable wrote: | I remember when they fired Victoria Taylor who was the | ambassador for their celebrity AMAs. At that exact time, | AMAs were absolutely hopping with celebrities and even | President Obama. Reddit was getting huge media coverage and | that was likely lots of new traffic. | | ...and then they killed it... | | They still have celebrity AMAs but that was the peak and it | immediately lost most relevance. | mustacheemperor wrote: | There was a dedicated AMA app and it was poised to become | an independent revenue stream. The leadership's outright | destruction of the AMA platform in their attempt to | monetize it looks like a microcosm of what they're doing | to the entire site today. If they start booting | moderators during the blackout, that will complete the | congruence. | TheFreim wrote: | I don't know if it's "tone deaf" so much as honest. I wish | companies were willing to give the real reason behind changes. | no_wizard wrote: | I for the life of me can't figure out why they are charging so | much money for the API. They could do other things such as: | | - Mandate as part of the TOS[0] that API users _must_ display the | ads in the application unless they pay a higher fee. I get alot | of people use 3rd party apps to escape ads, but this wouldn 't be | the end of the world, it also allows the developer some | discretion on how the ads can be formatted visually which could | actually be a big win for Reddit in some ways. Make all this | contingent on app review and auditing of the app. | | - Work with the community to establish a more reasonable API fee. | I'm sure everyone can find an agreement here somehow. All but the | smallest players likely would find this agreeable. | | - Only allow premium (and therefore ad free users) to use 3rd | party apps. If they aren't a premium Reddit user they need to use | the official client. This seems like the most pragmatic option to | _me_ , since those users would by pass ad revenue anyway. | | [0]: Terms Of Service | mostlysimilar wrote: | They're either entirely incompetent or they're intentionally | driving away 3rd party apps. I can't see any other alternative | than that. | ttctciyf wrote: | Maybe they're hoping that future LLM trainers will cough up | the crazy prices? | jsheard wrote: | It's pretty obviously the latter, the decision to kill access | to NSFW posts via the API while the official apps will | (AFAICT) still be able to access them means that 3rd party | apps will be on the back foot _even if they pay,_ for no good | reason Reddit has been able to articulate. | | NSFW on Reddit isn't just porn, the tag is used in the | literal sense of "your boss wouldn't approve" or as a content | warning for violence, heavy subjects, etc. | | e.g. https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/search?q=nsfw%3Ayes&r | estr... | KennyBlanken wrote: | Yeah, I don't think people truly appreciate how valuable | the data collected by mobile apps is for selling to | marketers and advertising (which can't be blocked anywhere | nearly as easily as it can be via browsers.) | | There's a reason everyone pushes you to install their app; | they want all that sweet, sweet time/network/location data | and the ability to drive traffic to whatever degree they | want via notifications. | | I believe notifications also allow them to wake their app | and collect data at that point in time, which they couldn't | ordinarily do because iOS and Android have much more | restrictions on background activity? | mustacheemperor wrote: | This explains the API changes themselves, but not the | leadership team's behavior throughout the process. Holding | this AMA didn't do anything productive for that objective | but resulted in even more foot-in-mouth, now with even more | attention than before. | | Reddit's leadership had the potential headline "3rd party | developer claims tiff with reddit administration in post" | and took it upon themselves to upgrade it to what's here. | M2Ys4U wrote: | The two options aren't mutually exclusive, though. It's | both, IMO. | Alupis wrote: | > or they're intentionally driving away 3rd party apps | | This doesn't seem to make sense. If Reddit wanted to kill 3rd | party apps, they would just disable public API access | entirely. The reaction would be basically the same it seems. | SkyPuncher wrote: | LLMs are so valuable that these fees are must be this high to | keep them in check. | | The fundamental problem is they're not differentiating pricing | between data scrapers and user apps. | | Heck, they don't even need to display ads in 3rd party apps. | Just let me subscribe to Reddits API directly. Let me pay for | my monthly usage. | robryan wrote: | This seems easy, you have limits per client per user. | eulers_secret wrote: | Just append .json to any Reddit URL and you'll get a full | dump of that page, we'll see if they get rid of this feature | as well. Way easier than scraping. | redox99 wrote: | LLMs will just scrape the website like they do with the rest | of the internet. For Alphabet, Microsoft and some others they | don't even need to do that as they already have everything | stored for search results. | vkou wrote: | I'm pretty sure Reddit can figure out how to sell API access | to LLMs, and how to differentiate that from my 'API access' | because I happen to use Reddit through a mobile app. | indymike wrote: | > I for the life of me can't figure out why they are charging | so much money for the API | | They are discontinuing the API, except for a small number of | customers willing (maybe) to pay their price for the API. | no_wizard wrote: | I don't think this materially changes anything I posited | though. | VWWHFSfQ wrote: | > allows the developer some discretion on how the ads can be | formatted visually | | this is absolutely the opposite of what they would want. Brands | have very tight control over display advertising and would have | to approve it everywhere | no_wizard wrote: | I'm thinking more about how it flows in the feeds, not | arbitrary control. The nuance is a little hard for me to | explain, but basically I just imagine they could do a better | job highlighting _this is an ad!_. Current Reddit default | approach makes ads seem like they 're from a normal user or | its a subreddit. | | I should've clarified | x0x0 wrote: | > I for the life of me can't figure out why they are charging | so much money for the API. | | The claim (made by several mods) is that they are spending > | $10m annually on the API once you include eng effort, and they | want a return on the opportunity cost, not just the pure | compute cost. | | Additionally, they've run reddit so shockingly incompetently | that they appear to have separate, better APIs that they only | allow their internal apps to use. So when they complain about | the inefficiency of use of the available APIs, keep that in | mind... | | Clearly, however, they just don't want other frontends. See eg | them moving to measuring API calls on a per-app basis, rather | than on a per-app per-user basis. It's dumb, imo, to not just | say so. | | And like everything reddit does, this was done wildly | incompetently. I'd ask how they could possibly have not thought | through the impacts on accessible frontends, or mod tools | (which itself demonstrates the fractal incompetence of reddit: | why do mods have to build or buy their own tools?), but... | well, reddit. | | NB: so fractally incompetent that they apparently can't even | measure api usage and share that with API users in real or | near-real time. Like... how. Just how. | micromacrofoot wrote: | because they want to push people to the first party app to | boost userbase and data collection before IPO, it's all more | money in their pockets because they're looking at cashing out | in the short term and don't care much about the long term | | in the immediacy people are still going to use reddit either | way because there's no easy and popular alternative, just like | twitter held on to most users despite all the noise | TranquilMarmot wrote: | Another reason a lot of users like to use third-party apps and | old.reddit.com is to avoid all of the "Coins"/"rewards" and NFT | avatars that litter the page these days and make it a | distracting experience to try and read comments and posts | (which should be front-and-center). ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-09 23:00 UTC)