[HN Gopher] Miraheze to shut down ___________________________________________________________________ Miraheze to shut down Author : tech234a Score : 58 points Date : 2023-06-16 19:33 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (meta.miraheze.org) (TXT) w3m dump (meta.miraheze.org) | foobarbecue wrote: | Was doing some reverse engineering recently and wanted a quick | wiki to put stuff on in case others wanted to join in and | contribute findings about the same product. Looked around and | Miraheze seemed to be the only real option for free wiki hosting | (I tried another one first, don't remember what it was called, | but it was bad). | | Experience was pretty good adding the pages but then I went back | 6 months later to try and consult my wiki. It had been deleted | per an inactivity policy. Fair enough... they did warn me -- my | own fault for not checking the email account I'd signed up with. | | Anyway, I'm sad to see them go because it was a great service and | I don't know of any replacement. | bursted wrote: | There have been semi-regular backups of all Miraheze wikis for | a long time, if you lost your content, I think, with luck, you | could find it archived: | | https://archive.org/search?query=miraheze | foobarbecue wrote: | Yeah, NotAracham from Miraheze was really helpful and pointed | me to this page: https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:NotArach | am/Wiki_Recovery... but I went through it and it doesn't seem | like my wiki was captured on archive.org unfortunately. The | .tar backups on archive.org only go up to 2021. | VWWHFSfQ wrote: | These kinds of sites always just end up as a paste/upload bin of | the abhorrent content that you could possibly imagine. I don't | think it's possible to run this kind of site anymore. | cxr wrote: | This is a bummer. | | Miraheze is/was a wiki farm that provided a free Mediawiki-based | wiki to pretty much anyone who was able to articulate a reason | and fill out a request to be given one. This was invaluable in an | age where the term "wiki" has become so debased that "a bunch of | Markdown files in a GitHub repo" is, against all good taste and | reason, considered a wiki. Miraheze was supported by donations, | which is almost certainly why it's shutting down. There's no | reason I can see that it shouldn't have allowed you to set up an | annual bill-me cycle, but it didn't. And now it's going away, | unfortunately. It would've be a good candidate for a pay-what- | you-want model that incorporated usage-based pricing. | ocdtrekkie wrote: | Thanks for explaining. This announcement joins a long list of | shutdown announcements where I find out a thing exists by its | shutdown announcement, which neglects to explain why I should | care about it. | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | > _...long term sustainability problems, financial situation..._ | | Weird, because https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Finance says they | have more money right now than they had at the start of the year | and twice as much as they had the same time last year. | | > _Owen and Alexander are fully committed to seeing the sustained | growth of Miraheze_ | | > _Compared to where we were before 2019, Miraheze is in a much | better financial position, has drastically improved its legal | standing and compliance and has taken strides to improve the | technological stack behind the project through the right levels | of investment being open for technical volunteers to harness._ | | So, which is it? Are you shutting down or fully committed to | sustained growth? Are you now unsustainable or better financially | than ever before? | | Nothing about this announcement makes sense to an outside | observer who has no idea what "taking into account recent events" | means. | duskwuff wrote: | There's some further context at | https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Community_noticeboard#Stateme... | -- specifically: | | > To clarify a bit on the reason behind this choice, the | technical team behind Miraheze is currently 3 people (5 if you | include two unprocessed resignations). Two of those three | people (myself include) are currently burned out on the project | and wish to step away. | | There's also some discussion of possibly handing over the | project. | golph wrote: | Also seems to tie together with the last bullets on these | minutes: https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Board/Policies/202306 | 07-Minut... | joecool1029 wrote: | I had figured it was not exactly technical burnout in | running Mediawiki installs but regulatory burnout in | following Euro GDPR/cookie banner/bullshit-of-the-now | requirements. Some of them are easy but the rest phase in | once you reach a certain scale of users (which it sounds | like they probably have). | [deleted] | KomoD wrote: | Yeah what is up with that... | tallies wrote: | My impression from reading their Discord server yesterday is | this: | | - Volunteers from Miraheze planned to create a paid wiki | hosting service to supplement Miraheze called WikiForge | | - Several of those volunteers left Miraheze to start a free | wiki host called WikiTide | | - The remaining volunteers were burnt out already and decided | to call it quits | | - There are some talks of handing off Miraheze to another group | of volunteers | | FWIW I had a horrible experience using Miraheze last year: | | - September: I created my wiki | | - November: Miraheze had an error with a drive and over 25% of | their wikis were lost. It took them weeks to admit the extent | of this error and that they had no plans to use a professional | recovery service | | - Early December: I recreated my wiki and rewrote it (250+ | articles) | | - Late December: Miraheze recovered the back-ups they thought | they had lost and said they would merge the new and old | versions of recreated wikis. Somehow, due to 'someone | unplugging a hard drive', they lost all of the content I'd | written since November. | | I've since learned my lesson about making local back ups, but | come on. It was clear there had been tons of technical and | communication problems for a long time. | nerpderp82 wrote: | One job! This sounds like an adversarial attack against those | who would host wikis on their site. | culi wrote: | My wiki also got affected by the harddrive. They send out a | message with everything they knew pretty much immediately | even to people not affected by the error and continued to | update as they learned more. Not sure why you seem to think | it took "weeks". For a volunteer-run service they've actually | been quite on top of it and compassionate in my experience | helf wrote: | [dead] | Quarrel wrote: | Certainly it is hard to make it gel on the money side. | | From their frontpage: | | > If 550 of Miraheze's 300,000+ users gave only PS12 (16.35 | USD) once a year, Miraheze would exceed its budget | requirements. | | So not for want of PS6,600 / year, presumably? | | Labour's of love like this can just burn you out. Building the | right sustaining community is hard, but it also seems like | they're too big to just fizzle out like this? A shame. | sterlind wrote: | Sad news. I started a wiki on Miraheze years ago, that became a | fledgling community. It became inactive after a few years but I | really appreciated the no nonsense, ad-free, vanilla MediaWiki | hosting. They provided an important service for non-profits like | mine. | Tomte wrote: | That's sad. | | Some time ago there was some huge fallout/fight visible on their | Discord which I did not understand (it was all referencing some | internal Wiki, mailing lists etc.). | | That seem to be the "recent events" on first position in the | announcement. | gtirloni wrote: | They mention resignations and burnout but no further details: | https://www.avid.wiki/wiki/Forum:IMPORTANT:_AVID_is_moving_t... | kruuuder wrote: | This is the first time I'm hearing about this platform. Should I | have been aware of it before? | Arnavion wrote: | I only knew about it because a popular mod Space Exploration | for the video game Factorio has its wiki hosted on it. Actually | even then I never went up to miraheze.org to look at the rest | of the site. | KomoD wrote: | Doesn't look like anything special, just free mediawiki | hosting, powered by donations | foobarbecue wrote: | That's pretty special, though. A free web service without ads | or other BS. Please let me know if you find a good | replacement for Miraheze. | culi wrote: | media wiki's a particularly complicated thing to host and I | don't think there's anything else quite like MiraHeze | currently. It's been used by everything from video game wikis | to casual conlangers to even some state governments so I'd | say it's a pretty big deal | antisthenes wrote: | Have all the fan wikis now consolidated under the horrible ad- | ridden Fandom brand wikis now? | dublinben wrote: | There's an excellent alternative front-end for wikis hosted | there called BreezeWiki.[0] There's a mirror available at the | very convenient antifandom.com which allows you to easily view | a better version of any Fandom wiki page you've landed on. | | [0] https://docs.breezewiki.com/Links.html#%28part._.Mirrors%29 | bursted wrote: | I hate how in search results Fandom is always above the better | wiki about the same topic, that are independent or on better | wiki farms like Miraheze. Fandom's SEO is brutal. They've | slowly crippled the website and fucked over the regular users, | but that doesn't affect them does it? Pinned at the top of | Google there are always more clueless losers cascading in, they | can't lose. | duskwuff wrote: | Worse yet: Fandom has a policy of not deleting inactive | wikis, even if the community has deliberately abandoned them | to move elsewhere, and will treat any attempt to advertise | that another wiki has been created as vandalism and will | block users (even wiki admins!) who attempt to do so. | | This means that, if a community does decide to move their | wiki off of Fandom, they have an uphill battle to "beat" | their old wiki in search results. In many cases, Google will | treat the new wiki as duplicate content and suppress it in | search results unless pages are substantially rewritten. | iamacyborg wrote: | Even worse, Google actively penalises wikis that choose to | fork from Fandom. | ignitionmonkey wrote: | I ran into this issue recently after I realised the Zelda | Wiki split again after the Gamepedia/Fandom merger due to | disagreements. Now there are two Zelda Wikis that look almost | identical, but it's clear the split wiki[1] is the original | in terms of its staff and layout, and Fandom[2]'s is like an | afterimage. | | Looking at Tears of the Kingdom pages (which released well | after the wiki split), Fandom is clearly falling behind, but | it'll likely still hold onto top position and waste people's | time. If Fandom had the wiki "spirit", it would close its | wiki and maybe even redirect to help Zelda Wiki continue to | grow. But they did pay a lot for Gamepedia, so money | understandably gets in the way of that. | | This situation doesn't seem unique. There's an extension | which redirects/rewrites Fandom to indie wikis.[3] It has | 4000+ users which is more than I'd expect. | | [1]: https://zeldawiki.wiki/wiki/Main_Page [2]: | https://zelda.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page [3]: | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/indie-wiki- | bu... | duskwuff wrote: | There's a nontrivial number of gaming wikis moving over to | wiki.gg. | no_time wrote: | Not all. There are still some independent holdouts like | https://yugipedia.com/ and some decent wiki hosts like | https://wiki.gg/ | | Gamepedia being folded into Fandom is still a massive shame | though. From gold to septic waste... | iamacyborg wrote: | Wiki.gg was setup by the folks that used to run gamepedia, | fwiw. | tekla wrote: | Oh goddamnit, I run a Wiki for a non profit off of Miraheze. Any | alternatives that might be recommended? | ilaksh wrote: | There might be a Docker image you could use with Digital Ocean. | | MediaWiki is also in any cPanel via Softaculous. | https://www.inmotionhosting.com/support/edu/cpanel/install-m... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-16 23:00 UTC)