[HN Gopher] Sacrifice the first 13 years of your life to Google ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Sacrifice the first 13 years of your life to Google for 2M
        
       Author : gigatexal
       Score  : 8 points
       Date   : 2023-06-16 21:28 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (gigatexal.blog)
 (TXT) w3m dump (gigatexal.blog)
        
       | JohnFen wrote:
       | 13 years and you only get $2M? No thanks, that's far too little
       | for such a large ask.
        
         | syntaxing wrote:
         | Both my parents worked since their teens and hasn't reached 2M
         | combined GROSS. Let alone net. 2M in 13 years is a dream for
         | most.
        
       | nostrademons wrote:
       | I did basically this except that I already had ~4 years of work
       | experience (all in startups) when joining Google, I "retired" at
       | 33, and then un-retired at 39 to have kids and buy a house in the
       | Bay Area.
       | 
       | I wouldn't recommend doing it now, simply because "past
       | performance does not equal future results". Joining Google in
       | 2009 was an awesome move; the stock has roughly 15x'd since then.
       | Joining Google in 2023 will probably not result in the same
       | performance. Tech companies have this pattern of growing and
       | growing and growing and then...dying. Just ask anyone that worked
       | at Silicon Graphics in the 80s, Apple or Sun Microsystems in the
       | 90s, or Yahoo in the 2000s. It's unlikely that Google will have
       | the same growth or compensation in the 2020s that it did in the
       | 2000s and 2010s.
        
       | NumeroUnoUno wrote:
       | I mean hindsight... why not just say buy a house when he was 20
       | and then you'd be a multi-millionaire after 13-years.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | gigatexal wrote:
       | Or, how if you spend a ton of time living as a stoic, and focus
       | everything on that next promotion you could have nearly 2M saved
       | by your early 30s.
        
       | sashank_1509 wrote:
       | Ok this is extremely wrong on so many accounts.
       | 
       | 1. Firstly how is it 4.6k / month, it should be more like 8-9k
       | per month. I work in Seattle which is lower tax but also lower
       | base and I get 8k per month as a new grad. So no you can easily
       | save 4K a month, not 1.2k. The authors numbers are closer to that
       | of a grad student that I also was.
       | 
       | 2. Next, the main thing this article gets wrong, no you're not
       | going to become a principal engineer in Google in 16 years. L5 is
       | terminal in Google, though with recent level inflation, a smart
       | ambitious grad can reach L6 in 6-8 years (though much longer is
       | common). Anything beyond that is not guaranteed, even if you
       | spend long hours working very hard. Google is annoying in the
       | sense that the promotion is far more political than it needs to
       | be with a committee and whatnot that I often find it to be a
       | shitshow but even if you take a much more results oriented
       | company like say Apple, going beyond ICT5 is not easy. As an
       | engineer the main thing that gets you promoted, is either solving
       | a really hard technical challenge that the rest of the
       | organization was struggling with. By definition these problems
       | are hard, long hours won't solve them. You also need to have an
       | intuition of what's solvable and what's not, there are a class of
       | technical problems in the organization which might essentially be
       | impossible to solve with the current knowledge we possess and you
       | can easily waste years of your life with nothing to show. I see
       | few people who rise up like this and they are all exceptionally
       | brilliant. The second way, more doable for the average engineer
       | is to bring a product to the masses that's moderately to highly
       | successful. This requires luck, timing the market and good
       | management skills to get something out there, you need to be the
       | reason Google chrome exists etc. Both these pathways require more
       | than just hard work, they require you to pick up a lot of skills
       | and most importantly they also require luck. Sometimes you can be
       | brilliant, use the right strategy etc and still have your product
       | fail/ not solve the problem.
       | 
       | TLDR; going beyond L6 is not easy and most won't reach there in
       | their career
        
       | syntaxing wrote:
       | One thing to note is that levels are triangle shaped. Not many
       | break the L6 barrier. I know people who have been L5 for over a
       | decade.
        
         | TX81Z wrote:
         | Nah. You just get a promotion every two years, and boom, CEO at
         | 35. Simple!
        
       | glitchcrab wrote:
       | Maybe it's a mindset thing, but I can't think of anything worse
       | than wasting ~16% of my life like this (average male lifespan in
       | the US is around 79 years). You're sacrificing a fair chunk of
       | your prime years in the hope that it pays off long term; imagine
       | if you followed this and died at 40? What a waste of a life. Or
       | what if you make some bad investment calls and it doesn't pan
       | out? What a waste of your time.
       | 
       | I made some good judgement calls and I've worked for decent
       | companies where I'm not on a treadmill chasing every dollar; I'm
       | still well paid to the point where I go on multiple holidays per
       | year, own a majority of my own home, paid cash for our decent
       | cars, and my wife has taken extended maternity leave because we
       | can cope fine without her salary. AND I got to enjoy the shit out
       | of those years.
       | 
       | No way in hell I'd trade that for the two million.
        
         | gigatexal wrote:
         | You're far less hedonistic than the target for this article I
         | think. I'm sure there's a balance, a sweet spot between
         | investment returns and quality of life. Maybe you've stumbled
         | upon it. But for me growing up working class poor this, if I
         | could do it over again, I'd do this. I didn't get married until
         | 29 anyway so I'm not too far off from the timeline I proposed.
        
           | glitchcrab wrote:
           | Maybe you're right and I'm just not the right sort of person
           | for this in many ways. However, I would question how living
           | in such a way that you're literally counting every penny for
           | so long would affect your relationship with money. It would
           | be a crying shame to have worked so hard for so long to earn
           | it and then not be able to bring yourself to enjoy it.
        
         | gigatexal wrote:
         | Paying cash for cars though? Everything I've read says that's
         | not a wise use of cash. The asset loses a ton of value and by
         | paying cash you've used it all chasing something that will
         | never appreciate. That being said if you can get value from
         | something for 10+ years that only needs upkeep and insurance
         | maybe the savings pays for that? I dunno.
        
           | nostrademons wrote:
           | You pay cash for it and then run it into the ground. Cars
           | will never be an investment (they're a depreciating asset,
           | except in 2021), but this way you can keep your consumption
           | to a minimum.
           | 
           | I've got a 14-year-old Honda that I paid $14K for. That
           | amortizes out to about $1K/year. Annual repair bills and smog
           | checks are still way less than $1K/year (I think I spend
           | amortized $200-300/year, plus vehicle registration renewal,
           | which is less on super old cars than new). I hear there are
           | people out there now who spend $1K/ _month_ on their car
           | payment. It 's pretty nice to not have to deal with that.
           | 
           | It's got plenty of life left too - I'm hoping to keep it
           | until EV technology stabilizes a bit and then just upgrade
           | straight to whatever EV gets it right.
        
           | glitchcrab wrote:
           | For starters I don't buy brand new, the family car was a low
           | mileage, well specced 18 month old car. I'm not concerned if
           | we lose a bit more money on it than we would have spent on
           | finance; we can afford it. I worked for a bank for some time
           | and it left me very much averse to using credit if I don't
           | need to - I saw some horror stories there of people who ended
           | up with so much debt that they would never clear it. Here in
           | the UK it's ludicrously easy to get crazy amounts of credit.
           | Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I like to own things outright.
           | The other car is my fun car (2018 BMW M3), I don't see myself
           | selling anytime soon.
        
         | fragmede wrote:
         | But to retire at _fourty_. What a dream. You get so much time
         | back.
         | 
         | Hey, different strokes for different folks.
        
       | prepend wrote:
       | Most people sacrifice the first 13 years for way less than $2M.
       | This seems like a funny complaint.
        
         | syntaxing wrote:
         | I didn't find the tone of the article as a negative thing.
         | Contrary, sounds more how to make the most of your "youth" to
         | gain financial independence.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-06-16 23:00 UTC)