[HN Gopher] Update: U+237C [?] &Angzarr; ___________________________________________________________________ Update: U+237C [?] &Angzarr; Author : g0xA52A2A Score : 350 points Date : 2023-06-17 12:13 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (ionathan.ch) (TXT) w3m dump (ionathan.ch) | pavlov wrote: | _> "Although the Type Archive, which held the Monotype | Collection, is now shutting down..."_ | | Boo. Can't someone like Adobe fund a historical archive like | this. Photographs are not a replacement for the physical history | of this vanished trade. | thrdbndndn wrote: | I think it's something the government should step in, not a | private company. | mihaic wrote: | After decades of corporate propaganda, the mainstream view is | that "goverment can't do anything". | | This has led to people expecting the rich to donate for this | sort of outcome, instead of demanding better organization | from the government that's eating away almost half their | income. | | Rant asside, you're totally right. | chongli wrote: | Adobe could easily make a one-time donation of $millions to | set up an endowment which would keep them running for the | foreseeable future. The government could as well, I just see | it as less likely. The government seems much more likely to | maintain an active control over something like this, opening | up the possibility of political interference in the future. | kergonath wrote: | A private company is more likely to use it for propaganda | and marketing purposes. At least here government agencies | have competent historians. | timthorn wrote: | My understanding is that the archive isn't being disposed of, | but will be going into the Science Museum long term storage. | The photographs are not intended as a replacement for the | collections. | Quarrel wrote: | I (through my own ignorance?) haven't had much appreciation for | this bit of history, but I recently visited the fascinating | Museum Plantin-Moretus in Antwerp. | | https://museumplantinmoretus.be/ | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plantin-Moretus_Museum | | They were a publisher and printing house in Antwerp, starting | in the early waves of printing presses that swept Europe after | Gutenberg. | | Amazingly, it stayed in the family and the family obviously had | an incredible devotion to their origins, they have their | original presses (thought to be the oldest in the world), their | original type (their founder was a big believer in the power of | good type and bought up the rights where he could), the | original building, their original library. It is quite the | adventure (in a totally nerdish but culturally significant | way!). | | It was eventually sold to the city where it has been a museum | ever since. | | Back to the topic at hand, I agree with you, can't someone | acquire this??! :) | javajosh wrote: | I've often thought that the best Civilization would actively | maintain living examples of each historical milieu. A stone | age place and a middle ages place, a mid century place, and | so on. In this way the methods and knowledge of the past | would not be lost, and in the event of a calamity (like a | Carrington event, or nuclear war), it would accelerate our | recovery. Presumably the highest tech'd civ would impose | order on the rest to prevent the stronger civs attacking the | weaker ones (only the strongest civ could possibly enforce | this). | | (The prospect of having to recapitulate the advances of the | last 200 years fills me with indescribably weariness. | Physical typesetting being a good example. Who is foolish | enough to think you can "just read a book about it" and get a | working press going?) | runlaszlorun wrote: | That's a great idea. A lot of things make a lot more sense | when you can actually see the context they came from. | stuaxo wrote: | Indeed, we don't exactly treat our hunter-gatherers well. | theK wrote: | Interesting thought experiment. I'd wager there are equally | interesting ethics challenges that would need addressing in | order to actually do something like this well. | dec0dedab0de wrote: | _Unfortunately, as neither faculty nor a student at the | University of Cambridge, according to the quote they've given me, | requesting a digital copy of this document would cost 174PS_ | | Maybe just do a go fund me or something to raise the 174PS? That | is, if no students or faculty from the university of Cambridge | see this and help. | tux3 wrote: | I was going to say the same. HN should make quick work of that, | and even if it leads nowhere, the investigation is fascinating! | pja wrote: | Just post on r/cambridge and/or r/cambridge_uni reddit & ask if | a current or ex-student or faculty member would be willing to | request it from the stacks & make a copy. | | There's bound to be someone who'll drop in a request on their | behalf. | cxr wrote: | <https://old.reddit.com/r/Scholar/> is what you want. | foobarbecue wrote: | reddit is deadit | 2h wrote: | No, it's not | | https://reddit.com/r/cambridge | foobarbecue wrote: | Yeah. I was being facetious. I just meant that many of us | are avoiding it right now. | masklinn wrote: | Finding a Cambridge student or faculty willing to help doesn't | seem like it'd be super hard, the university has 6000 academic | staff and 25000 students. | | Even more so if alumni still have those accesses. | justincormack wrote: | Alumni do have access, so yeas lots more! | [deleted] | foobarbecue wrote: | Cambridge alum here (for my BA in 2009) but I'm in CA now. | Would be willing to try putting in the request. Not sure how to | contact Jonathan Chan... I'm not on any of the social media he | lists in his site footer... Anyone see an email for him? Edit: | nevermind, found it. Emailing him | foobarbecue wrote: | Heard back. Turns out it has to be a current student, | unfortunately. I'm sure he'll find somebody. | aleph_minus_one wrote: | > Cambridge alum here (for my BA in 2009) but I'm in CA now. | Would be willing to try putting in the request. Not sure how | to contact Jonathan Chan... | | Look at https://ionathan.ch/cv.html | Denvercoder9 wrote: | > That is, if no students or faculty from the university of | Cambridge see this and help. | | The author has said on Twitter that he already knows someone at | Cambridge he could ask: | https://twitter.com/ionathanch/status/1663423421831602178 | tekknolagi wrote: | OP, if you are reading this, please contact me (email on website | in bio). I would like to find a way to help fund the digital | request to continue this research. | formerly_proven wrote: | An email address is here: https://ionathan.ch/cv.html | migf wrote: | To the emoji t-shirt mobile!!! | tannhaeuser wrote: | In case you didn't already heard from others, there's the | http://xml.coverpages.org site hosting lots of pre-2000 material | related to ISO 8879 (SGML) and XML. Although I didn't find too | much on a quick ad-hoc search for ISO 9573, there's mention of | angzarr in a preview version of ISO 9573 at | http://xml.coverpages.org/ISO-PDTR-9573-13-2004.pdf by Martin | Bryant and David Carlisle. | | There's also casual mention of ISO 9573 on historical | comp.text.sgml Usenet archives. | | David and other people involved with SGML, MathML, and early | entity sets for math (and chemical etc.) symbols are hanging | around on the xml-dev mailing list (https://www.xml.org/xml-dev) | and perhaps can tell more about the origin of that character | (which looks more like a symbol for military or electrotechnical | use to my totally uneducated eye). | | Also, there's a typo in your post: Belisage Conference -> | Balisage Conference ;) | | Good luck. | ionathan wrote: | Whoops, thanks for catching that typo! | nocoiner wrote: | What's the potential copyright issue with the request to | Cambridge? | | BTW, terrific detective work. I love mysteries like these. | ionathan wrote: | When I tried to request it via ILL, they told me that the | amount of material scanned "exceeds copyright law and | scanning limits". I haven't bothered to look up whatever | law that is, and I'm not sure if it's a US thing, or if | it's on the UK side, and if so, whether students/faculty at | Cambridge are under the same restrictions and they'd have | to end up paying the same fees as well. I have a friend | whose advisor works there, but I'm reluctant to ask them | for the favour and potentially drag them into numerous | back-and-forth emails with Cambridge Library and copyright | issues... | moontear wrote: | Just on copyright - all you want is to take a peek? It is | not that you would have to share the complete scans with | the world. | | Let's say the character means "X" and you can see it on | some obscure page - could sharing that be a copyright | issue? | ionathan wrote: | Here's what the Cambridge Library says [1] about scans: | | > Scans are provided with certain conditions of supply: | | > 1. Not pass on, or upload, the electronic copy or make | it available to any other person | | > 2. Not make further printed or electronic copies | | :shrug: | | [1] https://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/search-and-find/zero- | contact-servi... | klik99 wrote: | I remember the previous post and find it weirdly compelling - the | cruft and leftovers as technology evolves is interesting - it's | like the appendix of monotype. I'm looking forward to the movie | adaptation where he drives himself completely crazy trying to | find out what the symbol means. I appreciate and can relate to | this need to dig into minutiae. | etothepii wrote: | In order to make a Hollywood film it would need to turn out | this was a message from The Creator. | klik99 wrote: | Pi 2: Right Angle with Downwards Zigzag Arrow | DonHopkins wrote: | The Story of Ampersand. | | https://sharegpt.com/c/J1U3T7m | efaref wrote: | > They conspired with a rogue hashtag | | ChatGPT thinks # is called "hashtag"? :( | aardvark179 wrote: | I'm sure somebody on here can help have a look. If you put in a | scan and deliver request then apparently you aren't meant to | share it with anybody else due to copyright, but I know somebody | who could request it and I'm sure could find the symbol in there. | Smaug123 wrote: | I've asked a friend who is sort of kind of a faculty member; they | may or may not be able to get access (they have a rather bespoke | institutional status), so please other people keep trying! | thrdbndndn wrote: | Is the article cut short? | | I thought there should be some content under heading "What now?". | | Very fascinating by the way, I remembered the original post. | [deleted] | ngvrnd wrote: | Can we get the Guided By Voices logo added to unicode? | http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7087/1132/1600/rune.1.jpg | jwilk wrote: | The previous post discussed on HN in 2022: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31012865 (295 comments) | ezequiel-garzon wrote: | Sort of related, could anyone please explain why there is a | , named character reference in the HTML standard? | | https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/named-characters.html... | whoopdedo wrote: | The now deprecated FONT FACE attribute was defined as a comma- | separated list of names. The entity was needed if you had a | font name with a comma in it. | | Another comma-separated list is in the TH|TD AXIS attribute | which is considered obsolete now. I found two other CSL | attributes in APPLET ARCHIVE (depr.) and AREA COORDS but | neither of them need a comma entity. | | So the comma entity exists only as a historical artifact. | jwilk wrote: | Couldn't you use , instead? | bruce343434 wrote: | Perhaps for usage as an escaped form of `,` in comma separated | value tables? Although good question why it's in the _HTML_ | spec, pasting raw csv inside of an element and then needing to | read it back seems like a rare use case. | toast0 wrote: | Why not? There's lots of named characters in the range of | 0x20-0x2F, and symbols in general. | ezequiel-garzon wrote: | Those symbols (including comma) were added in later editions | of the standard, and I'm sure there's a reason, but it seems | to me if your keyboard has the characters & and ; it will | also have , no? I mean, why not add &a; for a then? | jwilk wrote: | There's also ";" standing for ";", which makes even | less sense to me. | omoikane wrote: | The "timeline" link in the article is broken (links to | localhost:4000), correct link should be | | https://ionathan.ch/2022/04/09/angzarr.html#summary-timeline | ionathan wrote: | lmao silly mistake. I'll get that fixed, thanks | amannm wrote: | Also on the edge of my seat here, wondering what field it could | be from. My ChatGPT-esque BS story is that this symbol was | misplaced alongside more abstract math-y symbols and was actually | briefly used in schematics to identify "lightning conductor" | components shown here https://electrical-engineering- | portal.com/wp-content/uploads... ... plausible, yes? | contingencies wrote: | Best theory yet. | ionathan wrote: | I've added a clarification to the end of the post on whether | angzarr might be found in the Cambridge Library document, which I | mentioned in my twitter thread but not in the post: | | > Furthermore, the Rare Books department tells me that | "unfortunately none of [the materials] seem to mention S16137 | through S16237". It's possible the glyph is listed without its | serial number, but it's equally possible that this document skips | that range altogether, just as 4-Line Mathematics had. | | I'd also like to point out that Cambridge alumni are unlikely | going to be able to request scans for free; I think you need to | be a _current_ faculty or student. | RugnirViking wrote: | From the previous post a year or so back I thought the mystery | was discovered that it was a new age druidic symbol someone had | stuck in | grose wrote: | In a similar vein, there are kanji (Chinese characters) with | unknown origins called "ghost kanji". | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIS_X_0208#Kanji_from_unknown_... | dboreham wrote: | Since I just returned home to the US from a visit to Japan, I | found that fascinating reading. | contingencies wrote: | There are also character variants. Sometimes between CJK, but | also historic. I attended a conference at _Academica Sinica_ in | Taipei with knowledgeable academic sorts circa 2001 who had | apparently elucidated various issues with Unicode unification | coming from the full range of prior encodings, fonts, | dictionaries, input systems and mechanical typesetting systems. | eterevsky wrote: | I like how the kanji in the table are classified into 3 | categories: Unknown, Source unclear and Unidentifiable. | peterfirefly wrote: | and those that belong to the emperor, I presume. | pushedx wrote: | I wonder if this is some sort of "signature character", that the | designer would use to discover if their work had been lifted, | possibly dating back centuries. | yosito wrote: | [flagged] | HappyPanacea wrote: | The author is a PhD student therefore he will be time-rich but | money-poor so it is not surprising as you think. | scrollaway wrote: | Is it weird to you that some people make less money than you? | msla wrote: | What's bizarre to me is that they're using British currency but | putting the currency sign at the end of the numbers. | LukeShu wrote: | It might not have the answers he's looking for. When I've gone | on such hunts, yeah, any one cost isn't so bad, but if I open | that box of paying for documents, I could _easily_ drop | thousands of dollars and not actually be any closer to the | answer. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-17 23:00 UTC)