[HN Gopher] How I feel quitting my own startup
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How I feel quitting my own startup
        
       Author : aqui_c
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2023-06-18 17:55 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.aquiles.me)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.aquiles.me)
        
       | AHOHA wrote:
       | Although it wasn't as a founder, but I can relate, in one of a
       | small startup I got hired as the first engineer, rest were a
       | founder and sales guy and a part time HR girl, so as expected, I
       | solely built the architecture, few fully fledged platforms,
       | dozens of PoC, successfully delivered projects, then after 1.5y
       | the second engineer got hired, now I'm guilty as probably you
       | mentioned being emotionally attached to my work, after all, I
       | really was invested in it, I even designed the icons for these
       | platforms and the proper catchy names in addition to the
       | software/hardware engineering design, to writing the docs and
       | even pitching the work for technical clients since sales guy had
       | no idea what the work was beyond the concept.
       | 
       | After a while, same thing started to happen, promises were made
       | these platforms can deliver even though technically is impossible
       | (so you can guess later when the client know these promises were
       | BS), not getting invited to critical meetings, sales team (grew
       | later than one guy) is gatekeeping the communication and only
       | dripping to engineers the client requirements after they add
       | their own unrealistic expectations, started to exclude me for
       | training clients on how to use these platforms as only sales team
       | are doing those (funny as most of the time, the first question
       | they get asked and they are stuck, and ended up they calling me
       | during the session remotely), and after long discussions that it
       | isn't possible to be carried by sales and need a technical team,
       | they quickly hired a co-op to act as one during these sessions...
       | among other issues, I call these situations are simply sabotaging
       | the company/startup based primarily on greed, in this case it was
       | by the sales and CEO followed later.
       | 
       | Now I had my lessons learned in that experience, but I'm sure
       | your situation is worse being the founder, but I felt a good
       | peace of mind after leaving them so hopefully you did the good
       | thing.
        
         | two_in_one wrote:
         | As long as you have significant stock it probably doesn't
         | matter much. Like for that engineer with 10% of Yahoo, or chief
         | cook at Google. If you are ambitious, then you need an
         | assistant to do what you are doing now. Better a small team
         | under your leadership ;) The difficult part is to make them
         | believe it.
        
           | robocat wrote:
           | > As long as you have significant stock
           | 
           | Minority shareholding is actually pretty shitty, as I am sure
           | a few people on this thread would agree.
        
             | two_in_one wrote:
             | Most of my savings came from minority stock. It was a nice
             | surprise when I finally moved out. Could be better if I
             | didn't sell it right away, but you never know...
        
       | mfjordvald wrote:
       | Side note, but the small font size + light grey text on the white
       | background made it a bit of an eye strain for me to read your
       | story, would definitely benefit a bit from some more contrast.
        
       | sim7c00 wrote:
       | even thoug i dont know u. for me i relate in this way. i love to
       | start things, motivate others, and dream big. however, at some
       | point though it makes me sad, i feel like the idea is better off
       | in other peoples hands. i struggle to focus and .... just want to
       | start new things and motivate new ppl. i dont do startups for
       | this reason but actually you writing this blogpost makes me feel
       | maybe there is a place for me. to get the ball rolling and then
       | leave it to people who are good at being consistent and seeing
       | things through, but maybe less at starting and gathering
       | motivation in the early stages. everyone has their own strengths
       | and pitfalls. each end is a new beginning and i am sure after
       | this tough breakup u will have learned a lot and find a new
       | wonderful thing in ur life! =) all the best!
        
       | totallywrong wrote:
       | No costumers, no product, and somehow he's leaving a team behind?
       | How does that work?
        
       | glitchc wrote:
       | Hi OP, it's a truly sad event when people conspire against you.
       | Have you received legal advice? Even though you are not working
       | for the company anymore, you still have rights as a shareholder.
       | A lawyer can help articulate and fight for those rights.
        
       | aqui_c wrote:
       | I left the startup I co-founded 4+ years ago. The entire process
       | was an emotional roller-coaster.
       | 
       | My co-founders (and business partners), who are the majority
       | shareholder, made it abundantly clear that the company was
       | 'theirs'. They made decisions behind my back although I am the
       | only founder working full time on the company. I felt alienated,
       | undervalued, and frankly quite miserable for a while.
       | 
       | At some point, when this behavioral pattern started affecting
       | other team members and I realized I had nothing left to do, it
       | was time for me to move on.
       | 
       | I tried to write down how I felt, keeping it politically correct.
        
         | neilv wrote:
         | Based on this description, I had to double-check that you
         | weren't a particular founder I know.
         | 
         | FWIW, it's not just you; these seem to be non-rare things to
         | happen.
         | 
         | One can _guess_ at the likelihood that egos, differing
         | understandings /philosophies, or just plain greed are likely to
         | become a showstopper problem.
         | 
         | But, unless it's obvious that the showstopper problems are
         | likely (some people telegraph warning signs heavily), if one is
         | ever going to do anything, one has to guess and sometimes take
         | a leap of faith.
        
           | aqui_c wrote:
           | Indeed, I've found some others in similar situations.
           | Definitely a learning experience on which to build.
        
           | ilamont wrote:
           | Cofounder conflict is one of the biggest untold stories of
           | the startup world. Happens all the time, but no one wants to
           | admit the scale of the problem or get into their own
           | specifics.
        
         | treprinum wrote:
         | By leaving you gave your co-founders what they wanted and they
         | probably celebrated that their nasty behavior led to the
         | expected outcome. Sometimes it's worth fighting and not
         | avoiding conflicts.
        
         | whack wrote:
         | Sorry to hear that. How did you end up in a situation where
         | you're the only founder working full-time but the other
         | founders have more equity and control over the business?
        
         | JimtheCoder wrote:
         | It is probably no consolation for you, but now your former co
         | founders have "their" own company that's four years old, still
         | has no customers or an MVP, and apparently no one really
         | working full time on the company...
         | 
         | Seems like they get what they deserve...
        
           | aqui_c wrote:
           | Well, there's one product, one MVP, and a team of 8 full-
           | timers... My biggest concern was the people, trying to find a
           | situation that somewhat guarantees their short-term future
           | and they can then go from there..
        
             | glitchc wrote:
             | Honestly not your problem at this point.
        
             | JonChesterfield wrote:
             | If the full time people don't identify a founder leaving as
             | an existential threat and look for their way out that's on
             | them.
        
               | quickthrower2 wrote:
               | Also it is a job. People can get fired (impacted I mean)
               | at any company. They weight it all up like any other job.
               | Company is family never really existed.
        
         | opmelogy wrote:
         | That really sucks. I'm sorry to hear it.
         | 
         | I tried twice to start software companies with people I knew.
         | Both times the other party didn't invest nearly as much time as
         | I was putting in. And in both cases I figured this out fairly
         | early and started to match their drive and investment into what
         | we were building. As you'd expect, the companies folded within
         | a few months.
         | 
         | What's interesting to me is that one of the guys I'm still
         | friends with and the story he tells for why it folded is very
         | different from my view. To him, it was me backing away and
         | causing it fail and from my experience, it was I switched from
         | working on it 7 days a week to working on it two weekends a
         | month. I don't think he's being mean spirited here - I think he
         | is just that clueless about what was going on.
         | 
         | My current start-up was founded differently. My partner and I
         | did multiple smaller projects together to see if we could work
         | together. We also went through a deep dive on "past traumas"
         | (key life defining moments for us) along with exercises on what
         | sorts of values we want to inject into the company (ranging
         | from how we handle feedback, to how we respond to failure, to
         | what our employees would say about us and the company 2 years
         | in the future, etc.). This allowed us to understand where we
         | are coming from, figure out if our values aligned, and help
         | lean on each other when things got hard/stressful. It really
         | does make navigating building something together. Basically
         | "wtf?!" reactions can easily be replaced with "uh oh, is
         | everything okay?"
        
           | taneq wrote:
           | It sounds to me like the two perceptions of your previous
           | startup are pretty well aligned. You felt your partner was
           | coasting so you checked out. They felt that you checked out.
           | Maybe they were doing more than you realised, or maybe they
           | were just freeloading.
        
         | David_SQOX wrote:
         | Life is too short to stay miserable, OP. You launched a startup
         | that has lasted 4+ years, that in and of itself is a huge
         | accomplishment. I've had several startups fail over 20 years
         | and each was a it's own heavy learning experience.
         | 
         | You've gotten much further than most ever will. Good work aqui!
        
           | aqui_c wrote:
           | Thanks! I try to stay as positive as possible, and looking
           | forward to the new opportunities that'll appear.
        
             | j45 wrote:
             | There is always what's next for people who don't finish
             | learning and experimenting .. and consequently peaking.
             | 
             | Keep moving, Inward onward and upward
        
         | psyklic wrote:
         | FWIW something similar happened to me as well, dropped out of
         | school to go full-time as a co-founder. We put in writing
         | several times that we held similar numbers of shares, yet nine
         | months in discovered my business partner awarded himself nearly
         | all of the equity. When I left due to this, the company
         | completely lost velocity for over a year, which I suspect might
         | happen due to your departure too.
         | 
         | The betrayal weighed on me for years, especially since I
         | eventually had to involve lawyers. I think the most important
         | thing you can do is find new opportunities to occupy your mind
         | so you can learn from it but not dwell on it.
        
           | taberiand wrote:
           | Sounds like something that should have involved lawyers right
           | from the "put in writing" stage.
        
             | psyklic wrote:
             | We had well-known lawyers from the beginning who deferred
             | payment until we raised. The problem was that we delegated
             | all legal to my business partner. When we traded the
             | written equity split, he didn't disclose that he held
             | (estimated) >80x more shares than what was listed next to
             | his name.
        
               | DelightOne wrote:
               | How can that happen and how do you avoid that happen
               | without ones' own knowledge?
        
               | quickthrower2 wrote:
               | Amazing people think that'll work. Might be OK if the
               | person doing that is the majority of the drive behind the
               | business. But if not of course it will collapse.
        
               | aledalgrande wrote:
               | How can people be so sketchy and still sleep at night is
               | out of my mind
        
               | calmlynarczyk wrote:
               | Psychopathy is a hell of a drug
        
         | princevegeta89 wrote:
         | Sorry to hear. Reminds me of the "cofounder" that I had who
         | wanted a sizeable equity but ended up bringing nothing
         | technical or managerial to the table. The startup failed after
         | 1 year, and we just wrapped everything up. I was secretly glad
         | it failed.
         | 
         | It also reminds me to only work on startups with someone who
         | you really know and trust, like a best friend.
        
           | barelyauser wrote:
           | Great way to ruin a great friendship.
        
             | princevegeta89 wrote:
             | I don't necessarily agree with this statement - if I know
             | my best friend inside out we will have a super large room
             | for flexibility, and that often prevents conflicts.
        
       | rsaxvc wrote:
       | This echos some of my feelings planning to move on after 14 years
       | at the same(non-startup) place. Thank you for writing it.
        
       | throwaway778 wrote:
       | I'm struggling with making this decision at the moment and it was
       | interesting to read this.
       | 
       | I'm not a founder, but I'm the first hire and the first engineer
       | - there since day 2. Six years in, a couple of pivots, and now we
       | have a team of 100 people with a gigantic series A just closed
       | and an excellent PMF. I built most of the product myself - it's
       | genuinely game-changing and commercial demand is through the
       | roof. Enough equity that if we were acquired now I'd be set for
       | life.
       | 
       | But I just don't know if I can hack it anymore. The commercial
       | and product teams are pushing wildly unrealistic timelines for
       | new features, which then the technical teams end up the bad guys
       | for not being able to deliver on. Internal communication is all
       | over the place, with nobody seemingly aware of deadlines and
       | deliverables. The CEO is pretty visibly complaining about some
       | teams not working hard enough, because he doesn't see them in the
       | office or working evenings and weekends. Meanwhile I'm on 18 hour
       | days, under pressure to squeeze performance out of a team that I
       | already think is delivering good quality at a pretty rapid pace,
       | and being badgered constantly to provide KPIs and metrics for
       | them so that the C-suite can deicide if they're pulling their
       | weight.
       | 
       | It's almost exactly the opposite of the culture I'd want to
       | create in an engineering team. Instead of teamwork and
       | transparency aimed at producing a cohesive vision, everyone's
       | pulling in a different direction. Everyone is overworked and
       | making mistakes, and instead of trying to build systems and
       | processes to avoid these issues, it's become a blame game. The
       | answer to any problem always seems to be "work harder", rather
       | than providing the resources and support that teams require.
       | Features are being rolled out to customers against engineering
       | advice before they're finished, meaning a massive drag factor as
       | we scramble to patch them - and engineering leadership
       | desperately trying to protect the rest of the team from having to
       | pay for these decisions. And there's this message being
       | communicated from the top that suggests technical teams aren't
       | working hard enough that just feels utterly toxic. I'm probably
       | making it sound worse than it is, but for certain the last six
       | months have stopped being "I'm excited about working on this".
       | 
       | How do you make the decision that it's time to call it a day? Is
       | it practically possible to shift the culture? Or is it feasible
       | to detach yourself a little bit from it - concentrate on the
       | areas you can change, and stop caring about those you can't? I'm
       | a well-paid engineer in an interesting field, and I'm invested
       | financially and emotionally. It's hard to be objective about
       | whether it's time to quit.
       | 
       | Basically I can sympathise with the emotions you're going though
       | and thanks for writing about it. Hang in there!
        
         | te_chris wrote:
         | Ask yourself if you're really that essential to things going
         | forward? If not, then feel proud of what you've done and do
         | what you need to do.
         | 
         | And I mean really ask yourself. As you say, teams are scaled
         | now, individual effort has less of a multiplier. In most cases,
         | they'll probably be fine without you. That should feel
         | liberating.
        
         | subarctic wrote:
         | I kind of hope you hold onto this throwaway account so you can
         | tell us what you ultimately decide to do - from what you've
         | said it sounds like the right course of action for you is to
         | exercise your options to lock in your equity (assuming you have
         | enough spare cash to do so) and move on, starting things off
         | with a long vacation because you've been working crazy hours.
         | Or you could start by just taking a long vacation and deciding
         | what you want to do. Or a short vacation to work up to the long
         | vacation - at the very least, a disconnect from the grind would
         | probably really help.
         | 
         | I say this as an individual contributor though, and I imagine
         | it must be tougher to consider walking away when you're a
         | manager and you have a team of people who will be directly
         | affected if you leave.
        
           | mkl wrote:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=throwaway778:
           | user:     throwaway778       created:  December 31, 2013
        
         | ghiculescu wrote:
         | > Is it practically possible to shift the culture?
         | 
         | Yes. But it requires saying no to lots of things you used to
         | say yes to (and vice versa), which can be extraordinarily
         | difficult
         | 
         | It may not feel like it, but if you have been around since day
         | 2 you'll be respected enough to try anything you like, as long
         | as you actually do it and don't complain (not saying you're a
         | whiner but some people are). You basically have tenure.
        
         | inconceivable wrote:
         | the sense of frantic feature building is normal for a high
         | growth startup. feeling constantly behind is also normal. a
         | high growth startup is not a loving, nurturing, comfortable
         | place. it's a mad dash for money and everyone is going to be
         | pushing as hard as they humanly can, both in terms of work but
         | also in terms of pushing others.
         | 
         | you're on the right track with the detaching yourself, but that
         | can only get you so far. at the end of the day you still need
         | to deliver things that sell. having people who don't know what
         | the fuck they're talking about demand all sorts of wild shit
         | from you is normal.
         | 
         | in the end, it's just difficult. you're being compensated with
         | money and equity - if those aren't up to snuff, negotiate for
         | more. if that doesn't work, you need to make the decision to
         | stay or leave. there's a chance they give you what you want
         | when you threaten to leave - and then you will have some
         | leverage. but just realize this is not ever going to be a walk
         | in the park. millions of dollars are on the line, people are
         | not going to behave rationally because they see you as the
         | limiting factor between them and their riches.
        
           | neon_electro wrote:
           | this is not the culture human beings should support or
           | tolerate at their workplace
        
             | convolvatron wrote:
             | its not even a good way to maximize output
        
             | inconceivable wrote:
             | my comment is descriptive, not prescriptive. i doubt anyone
             | even knows the difference anymore because of all the smarmy
             | posturing these days.
             | 
             | "this rock is hard, and has sharp edges. it will cut you."
             | 
             | "no! that is terrible! rocks should be soft, with round
             | edges! how dare you! nobody should accept rocks that are
             | hard and sharp! that's dangerous! why do you support
             | dangerous things?!"
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | ganbatekudasai wrote:
               | No it's not, it's a false equivalence. What the original
               | commenter described has way more pathologies than
               | "startups are hard", and it does not smell like success
               | to me. To pick up on your analogy, it's more like a rock
               | that has been drenched in poop by someone, and you're
               | supposed to use it to cut your food. There are other
               | sharp rocks around, and most of them are not covered by
               | poop, so you might be able to cut your food with it
               | _without_ getting a terrible disease and puke all food
               | out again in the process.
        
               | inconceivable wrote:
               | okay, so your position is that he should leave because
               | everyone is too mean. that's valid.
        
               | ganbatekudasai wrote:
               | Don't put words in my mouth. OP mentioned significant
               | equity and the possibility to be acquired, without any
               | details. This could both provide them with something to
               | show after enduring all the suck, as well as with a real
               | chance of changing management. If the question was to
               | join the company, or no equity was at play (including if
               | there's either no realistic chance of that equity being
               | worth something, or if the equity does not lose its value
               | for OP after quitting anyway), then yes, likely best to
               | leave immediately.
               | 
               | Simplistic phrases are not going to help in complex
               | situations with lots of details.
               | 
               | > because everyone is too mean.
               | 
               | No, because it sounds like a business bordering on
               | dysfunction. You should know the difference.
        
             | [deleted]
        
       | benjimouse wrote:
       | I went thru this seven years ago, leaving my startup which I'd
       | been with for about 15. I still considered it a startup after all
       | that time. The opportunity had long since been missed and all
       | that remained was a long slow grind down to nothing. Which is
       | exactly what has happened as it continued after my departure.
       | 
       | For me it was as close as I could imagine giving up a child would
       | be like, but in hindsight it was the best choice and I grew
       | hugely as a result.
        
       | ArcMex wrote:
       | This saddened me. Best of luck, truly.
        
       | acalzycalzy wrote:
       | A finishdown, if you will.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-06-18 23:00 UTC)